Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in Alabama
Federal RegisterDec 17, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service in Alabama
Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Field Office
Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in
Alabama
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in Alabama, U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in Section IV of the
FOTG of the NRCS in Alabama for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS in Alabama to issue conservation
practice standards: Constructed Wetland--(Code 656).
DATES: Comments will be received until January 18, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to Robert N. Jones,
Acting State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS), 3381 Skyway Drive, P.O. Box 311, Auburn, AL 36830. Copies of
the practice standards will be made available upon written request.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS
in Alabama will receive comments relative to the proposed changes.
Following that period a determination will be made by the NRCS in
Alabama regarding disposition of those comments and a final
determination of change will be made.
Dated: December 3, 1999.
J.B. Chaffin,
Assistant State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Auburn, Alabama.
[FR Doc. 99-32493 Filed 12-16-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.