Threatened and Endangered Species Management on the Allegheny National Forest, Warren, McKean, Elk and Forest Counties, Pennsylvania
Federal RegisterFeb 8, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Threatened and Endangered Species Management on the Allegheny
National Forest, Warren, McKean, Elk and Forest Counties, Pennsylvania
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare a Draft and a Final
Environmental Impact Statement to disclose the environmental
consequences of amending the Forest Plan to include various strategies
for managing federally listed threatened and endangered species on the
Allegheny National Forest. Species to be considered include the Indiana
bat (Myotis sodalis), the clubshell mussel (Pleurobema clava) and the
northern riffleshell mussel (Epioblasma torulosa rangiana), which are
federally listed as endangered, and the small whorled pogonia (Isotria
medeoloides) and the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) which are
federally listed as threatened. The proposed action is to amend and
supplement the standards and guides in the Allegheny Land and Resource
Management Plan (Forest Plan).
The purpose and need for this proposal is to maintain and enhance
habitat to ensure the continued existence of the aforementioned
threatened and endangered species in light of new information recently
acquired. There is a need to adjust some of the existing standards and
guides and provide some additional direction in the Forest Plan to
ensure their conservation. Based on a review of the regulations (36 CFR
219.10f) and of the Forest Service Manual and Handbook direction (FSM
1922.51 and FSH Chapter 5.32) the proposed action is a non-significant
amendment to the Forest Plan. The
[[Page 6035]]
proposed action does not significantly alter the long term goals and
objectives nor management area designations of the current plan. The
decision to amend the plan will extend until the Forest Plan is
revised, which is planned for the year 2001.
The Allegheny National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, at
the time it was completed in 1986, considered pertinent threatened and
endangered species and appropriate mitigation measures. This amendment
will consider the new information which has come out since 1986. Forest
Plan direction will be amended, where necessary, to ensure standards
and guidelines incorporate currently available knowledge concerning
these species.
Any modification required will be based on the range of site-
specific conditions that exist on the Allegheny National Forest and
will be designed to mitigate impacts from the ongoing and future
projects and to enhance the recovery of the threatened and endangered
Species.
As an initial step in completing this new Draft and Final
Environmental Impact Statement, Allegheny National Forest personnel
have completed a biological assessment which has been submitted to the
USDI-Fish and Wildlife Service for their consideration in preparing the
biological opinion. This biological assessment contains suggested terms
and conditions which relate to managing these threatened and endangered
Species. Many of these are already part of the standards and guidelines
in the Forest Plan.
Allegheny National Forest personnel invite written comments and
suggestions on the scope of this analysis and environmental impact
statement. That is, the Allegheny National Forest would like comments
on what issues and possible alternatives should be considered and
analyzed. In addition, the agency gives notice that the environmental
impact statement preparation process will be conducted so that
interested and affected people are aware of how they may participate in
and contribute to the final decision. This environmental impact
statement will result in an amendment to the Allegheny National Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan.
DATES: Comments and suggestions concerning the scope of the analysis
should be submitted in writing and postmarked by March 10, 1999, to
ensure timely consideration.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Endangered Species Management,
Allegheny National Forest, P. O. Box 847, Warren PA 16365.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Brad Nelson, Allegheny National
Forest at 814/723-5150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Forest Plan Background
The Allegheny National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan
(Forest Plan), approved in 1986, provides for the management of forest
resources. The Forest Plan was developed to maintain or enhance the
species composition, structure, and functioning of Allegheny plateau
ecosystems on the Allegheny National Forest, while providing a variety
of goods and services to the American people.
Analysis documented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement
evaluated potential effects on threatened and endangered species
inhabiting the Allegheny National Forest and determined actions
Allegheny National Forest personnel should implement which would
contribute toward their recovery.
As part of the planning process, Federal agencies are required to
comply with provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. This includes a requirement to consult with the U. S.
Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service on proposals which
may affect species federally listed as threatened, endangered, or
proposed. In February 1986, consultation was completed for the newly-
developed Forest Plan.
Since then, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Allegheny
National Forest have continued consulting when three different
Environmental Impact Statements proposed amendments to the Forest Plan,
when new issues have arisen, and when new species were added to the
endangered species list.
New Information Related to Threatened and Endangered Species
In July 1998, based on additional new information, Allegheny
National Forest personnel began informal consultation again with the
Fish and Wildlife Service. That information included the following:
Bald eagle populations have increased, with three new nests located on
or near the Allegheny National Forest; the Indiana bat was found on the
Allegheny National Forest; and two species of fresh water mussels had
been added to the Federal list of threatened and endangered species.
Continuing research and inventory of threatened and endangered
species populations on the Allegheny National Forest, as well as
refinement of our knowledge of these species' habitat requirements,
prompts us to update the potential effects of continued implementation
of the existing Forest Plan, as amended, on these five Federally listed
species.
Allegheny National Forest personnel completed a biological
assessment for the five species and transmitted it to the Fish and
Wildlife Service on December 17, 1998. The Biological Assessment
includes proposed terms and conditions, and any modifications issued by
the Fish and Wildlife Service in the bioligical opinion, would provide
the basis for the Forest Plan amendment. These terms and conditions
consititute the proposed action.
Proposed Action: Measures to Minimize Potential Adverse Effects to
Threatened And Endangered Species
Indiana Bat
Current Forest Plan standards and guidelines provide protection to
Indiana bat habitat and populations. The following measures are
proposed to strengthen the Allegheny National Forest's ability to
protect and manage habitat for this species. To understand these
measures, distinctions are made between green units and salvage units.
Green units are stands consisting primarily of live trees. Salvage
units are where conditions such as insect and disease infestations or
other catastrophic events have created a stand where the amount of dead
and dying trees predominate (<40% of relative stand density in live
trees).
The Allegheny National Forest standard of retaining 5-10 snags per
acre will remain in effect for all salvage units, while most snags will
be retained in green units. The modified standards would add a size
requirement for some of the retained snags. Retention of clumps of
existing trees in stands to be final harvested remains an important
component of bat habitat.
Caves
1. Continue working with universities, Pennsylvania Game
Commission, and local Allegheny National Forest users to locate and
survey caves that may contain Indiana bats. If an Indiana bat
hibernaculum is found on the Allegheny National Forest, consult with
the Fish and Wildlife Service to determine standards and guidelines
necessary to protect and manage the hibernaculum.
Potential Roosting/Foraging Habitat
1. Retain shagbark and shellbark hickories regardless of size in
partial and final harvest cutting units.
[[Page 6036]]
2. For green units (both partial and final harvests) retain snags
that do not pose a safety hazard to the sawyer or the public. Retain at
least 8-15 live trees per acre greater than 9 inches diameter at breast
height in all final harvest units and retain at least 16 live trees per
acre greater than 9 inches diameter at breast height in partial cuts.
3. For salvage units in partial cuts retain at least 5-10 snags per
acre greater than or equal to 9'' diameter at breast height and of
these 1 tree for each 2 acres greater than or equal to 20'' diameter at
breast height. Retain at least 16 live trees per acre greater than or
equal to 9'' diameter at breast height and 3 live trees for each acre
greater than or equal to 20'' diameter at breast height as recommended
by the Indiana Bat Recovery Team.
4. When planning partial cuts, strive to reduce canopy closure to
60-80 percent.
5. For salvage units in final harvest cuts and clearcuts, retain at
least an average of 3 snags for each acre greater than or equal to 9''
diameter at breast height, of these snags retain 1 for each 10 acres
greater than or equal to 12'' diameter at breast height. Retain at
least 8-15 live trees/acre greater than or equal to 9'' diameter at
breast height and at least 1 tree for each acre greater than or equal
to 20'' diameter at breast height.
6. Avoid removal of known roost trees. In the unlikely event that a
known roost tree must be removed, such removal will be conducted
through consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service.
7. Known maternity roosts may be removed at any time, after
consultation with Fish and Wildlife Service, if they constitute an
immediate threat to public safety. However, such removal will be as a
last resort, after other alternatives (such as fencing the area, etc.)
have been considered and deemed unacceptable.
8. Demolition or removal of buildings or other man-made structures
that harbor bats should occur while the bats are hibernating and a bat
box should be installed in a proper location to provide an alternate
roosting site. If public safety is threatened and the building must be
removed while bats are present, a bat expert should examine the
building to determine if Indiana bats are present. If Indiana bats are
present, consultation with Fish and Wildlife Service is required before
removal. If none are present, demolition can proceed.
9. If new planned road and trail construction, wildlife opening
construction, gravel pit development, federally owned oil and gas
development, or other non-forest uses create conditions where the
amount of forested acres drop below 30 percent of the watershed,
consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service will be initiated to
determine how best to provide habitat for the Indiana bat.
Water Sources
1. Create or renovate bat drinking water sources where none are
currently available (a minimum of one per square mile).
2. Allow water filled road ruts to remain where they do not
compromise soil and water quality.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Research
1. Follow interagency working group and/or Indiana Bat Recovery
Plan recommendations for research, inventory and monitoring habitat and
populations across the Allegheny National Forest.
2. Pursue additional funding and partnership opportunities to
complete needed research, inventory, and monitoring work.
3. Monitor snags, den trees, and reserve live trees on 10 final
harvest units and 10 partial cuts annually across the Allegheny
National Forest.
4. Where opportunities arise, work with land owners, general
public, and other agencies to promote education and information about
endangered bats and their conservation.
Clubshell And Northern Riffleshell Mussels
Current Forest Plan standards and guidelines provide protection to
clubshell and northern riffleshell populations and habitat. The
following measures are proposed to strengthen the Allegheny National
Forest's ability to correct erosion and sedimentation problems that may
result from past road and trail problems:
Continue to identify erosion and sedimentation problems associated
with Forest Service activities (primarily old roads and trails) with
particular attention to the 13 percent of the Allegheny National Forest
that drains directly into the Allegheny River. Where necessary
implement practices such as: (1) Using less erosive road surfacing
material (limestone) along sections of roads, and/or stream crossings
to the first cross-drain on either side of the crossing; (2) placing
rip rap at the outlet of those cross-drains on steep fill-slopes; (3)
placing additional cross-drains to dissipate runoff more frequently to
avoid concentrating more flow which could lead to formation of a new
channel to a stream, (4) placing additional cross-drains before a
stream crossing, (5) restricting use on problem roads (change from
``open'' to ``restricted'', and (6) obliterate roads no longer needed
for management activities that have potential for sediment input into a
stream course.
Bald Eagle
The following measures are proposed to strengthen the Allegheny
National Forest's ability to protect and manage habitat for this
species.
1. Change the seasonal restriction from February 1 to January 15
and re-write the Forest Plan standards and guidelines to be compatible
with the Bald Eagle Recovery Plan.
2. For any new access sites on Allegheny National Forest land
within the Allegheny Wild and Scenic River corridor, or requiring
federal funding or authorization, bald eagle use will be assessed
within the section of river corridor where human use will likely
increase.
3. The Forest Service will consult with Fish and Wildlife Service
on any Forest Service activities within the buffer zones around each
nest.
4. The Forest Service will collect data necessary to determine the
level of potential effects to nesting eagles on the Allegheny Reservoir
by determining the level of boating activity and the behavior of the
nesting pair while foraging and nesting before and after Memorial Day.
If any harrassment is noted or suspected, the Fish and Wildlife Service
will be contacted.
5. Continue discussions with the Pennsylvania Game Commission, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and USDI-Fish and Wildlife Service to determine
if boat access needs to be restricted in Cornplanter Bay.
6. The new contract for operating recreation areas and boat
launches on the Allegheny Reservoir will stipulate that discarded
fishing line along the shoreline developed for access will be cleaned
up monthly during the summer.
7. Signing and/or news releases to educate hunters not to shoot
eagles will be developed and distributed by Allegheny National Forest
personnel.
Small Whorled Pogonia
1. The survey of potential habitat within 227,000 acres of the
Allegheny National Forest has not found the small whorled pogonia.
Since no small whorled pogonias have been found, a new survey approach
is worth testing. The new proposed survey strategy would identify the
habitat with the highest potential for finding small whorled pogonia
and survey those areas each year. This would substitute for the current
practice of surveying for each individual project. By surveying the
highest potential habitat, the likelihood
[[Page 6037]]
of finding the species on the Allegheny National Forest will be
increased. If found, a better understanding of its habitat needs can be
assessed.
2. If a small whorled pogonia is found on the Allegheny National
Forest, consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service will be re-
initiated.
The Allegheny National Forest entered into formal consultation with
the Fish and Wildlife Service on December 18, 1998. During formal
consultation, the Fish and Wildlife Service may elect to change or
delete some of these proposed terms and conditions, or they may add new
terms and conditions. We expect the Fish and Wildlife Service to issue
a biological opinion with the final terms and conditions early in the
first half of 1999.
Proposed Forest Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Once the biological opinion is issued, Allegheny National Forest
personnel will complete the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and
send it out for review and comment.
The analysis documented in Draft Environmental Impact Statement
will consider a range of alternatives. One of these alternatives will
evaluate no change to the current Forest Plan (No Action). A second
alternative would be the proposed action which is to amend the Forest
Plan to incorporate the terms and conditions proposed in the Biological
Assessment, as modified by the Biological Opinion to be issued. Issues
which are generated through the scoping process may generate additional
alternatives.
Federal, State, and local agencies, and other individuals or
organizations who may be interested in or affected by the decision are
invited to participate in the scoping process. This process includes
the following: (1) Identification of potential issues; (2)
identification of issues to be analyzed in depth; and (3) elimination
of insignificant issues, those outside the scope of this analysis, or
those which have been covered by a previous environmental review. At
this point in the process, we would appreciate your comments on what
issues and possible alternatives should be considered and analyzed.
Comments directed toward the substance of the project, as opposed to
the scope of the analysis, are more appropriately submitted during the
comment period following release of the draft environmental impact
statement.
Preliminary issues identified include the following:
1. What are the effects of implementing current Forest Plan
direction on threatened and endangered species known to exist on or
near the Allegheny National Forest (and their habitat), given current
knowledge?
2. Are there additional actions Allegheny National Forest personnel
should implement that would contribute toward the recovery of these
species?
3. What are the changes to the current Forest Plan activities,
outputs, and environmental effects from implementing any additional
actions?
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency and to be available for public
review during April or May of 1999. At that time, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) will publish in the Federal Register a notice
of availability of the draft environmental impact statement. The
comment period on the draft will be 45 days from the date the EPA
notice appears in the Federal Register.
Related Court Rulings
The Forest Service believes it is important to give reviewers
notice at this early stage of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposals so that it
is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewers position and
contentions, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage may be waived if not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement,
City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir .1988), and
Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. supp. 1334, 1338 (E. D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that
those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of
the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
Comments and Decision
Comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific
pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of
the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement (Reviewers
may wish to refer to CEQ Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points). After the comment period ends on the draft
environmental impact statement, the comments received will be analyzed
and considered by the Forest Service in preparing the final
environmental impact statement.
The final environmental impact statement is scheduled to be
completed in August of 1999. In the final Environmental Impact
Statement, the Forest Service is required to respond to the comments
received (40 CFR 1503.4). The responsible official will consider the
comments, responses, environmental consequences discussed in the
environmental impact statement, and applicable laws, regulations and
policies in making a decision regarding this proposal. The responsible
official will document the decision and reasons for the decision in a
Record of Decision. That decision will be subject to appeal under 36
CFR part 217.
The responsible official is John E. Palmer, Forest Supervisor,
Allegheny National Forest, 222 Liberty Street, P.O. Box 847, Warren PA
16365.
Dated: February 2, 1999.
John E. Palmer,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 99-2907 Filed 2-5-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.