Mexican Fruit Fly Regulations; Addition of Regulated Area

Federal RegisterSep 28, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

7 CFR Part 301

[Docket No. 99-075-1]

Mexican Fruit Fly Regulations; Addition of Regulated Area

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are amending the Mexican fruit fly regulations by

designating an area in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA, as a

regulated area. This action is necessary on an emergency basis to

prevent the spread of the Mexican fruit fly to noninfested areas of the

United States. This action restricts the interstate movement of

regulated articles from the regulated area in California.

DATES: This interim rule was effective September 22, 1999. We invite

you to comment on this docket. We will consider all comments that we

receive by November 29, 1999.

ADDRESSES: Please send your comment and three copies to: Docket No. 99-

075-1, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Suite 3C03,

4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that

your comment refers to Docket No. 99-075-1.

You may read any comments that we receive on this docket in our

reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of the USDA

South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington,

DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,

please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.

APHIS documents published in the Federal Register, and related

information, including the names of organizations and individuals who

have commented on APHIS rules, are available on the Internet at http://

www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/webrepor.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael B. Stefan, Operations

Officer, Invasive Species and Pest Management Staff, PPQ, APHIS, 4700

River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-8247.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens (Loew), is a destructive

pest of citrus and many other types of fruit. The short life cycle of

the Mexican fruit fly allows rapid development of serious outbreaks

that can cause severe economic losses in commercial citrus-producing

areas.

The Mexican fruit fly regulations (contained in 7 CFR 301.64

through 301.64-10 and referred to below as the regulations) were

established to prevent the spread of the Mexican fruit fly to

noninfested areas of the United States. The regulations impose

restrictions on the interstate movement of regulated articles from the

regulated areas. Prior to the effective date of this rule, the only

areas in the United States regulated for the Mexican fruit fly were

portions of Texas.

Section 301.64-3 provides that the Deputy Administrator for Plant

Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), Animal and Plant Health Inspection

Service (APHIS), shall list as a regulated area each quarantined State,

or each portion of a quarantined State, in which the Mexican fruit fly

has been found by an inspector, in which the Deputy Administrator has

reason to believe the Mexican fruit fly is present, or that the Deputy

Administrator considers necessary to regulate because of its proximity

to the Mexican fruit fly or its inseparability for quarantine

enforcement purposes from localities in which the Mexican fruit fly

occurs.

Less than an entire quarantined State is designated as a regulated

area only if the Deputy Administrator determines that the State has

adopted and is enforcing a quarantine or regulation that imposes

restrictions on the intrastate movement of the regulated articles that

are substantially the same as those that are imposed with respect to

the interstate movement of the articles and the designation of less

than the entire State as a regulated area will otherwise be adequate to

prevent the artificial interstate spread of the Mexican fruit fly.

Recent trapping surveys by inspectors of California State and

county agencies and by inspectors of PPQ reveal that a portion of San

Bernardino County, CA, is infested with the Mexican fruit fly.

Specifically, on August 20, 26, and 27, 1999, inspectors found three

Mexican fruit flies in a residential area in San Bernardino County, CA.

Accordingly, to prevent the spread of the Mexican fruit fly to

noninfested areas of the United States, we are amending the regulations

in Sec. 301.64-3(c) by designating an area in San Bernardino and

Riverside Counties, CA, as a regulated area. A portion of Riverside

County, CA, is included in the regulated area because of its proximity

to the finding sites in San Bernardino County, CA. The regulated area

is described in the rule portion of this document.

There does not appear to be any reason to designate any other

portion of the quarantined State of California as a regulated area.

Officials of State agencies of California are conducting an intensive

Mexican fruit fly eradication program in the regulated area in

California. Also, California has adopted and is enforcing regulations

imposing restrictions on the intrastate movement of certain articles

from the regulated area that are substantially the same as those

imposed with respect to the interstate movement of regulated articles.

Emergency Action

The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

has determined that an emergency exists that warrants publication of

this interim rule without prior opportunity for public comment.

Immediate action is necessary to prevent the Mexican fruit fly from

spreading to noninfested areas of the United States.

Because prior notice and other public procedures with respect to

this action are impracticable and contrary to the public interest under

these conditions, we find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553 to make this

action effective less than 30 days after publication. We will consider

[[Page 52212]]

comments that are received within 60 days of publication of this rule

in the Federal Register. After the comment period closes, we will

publish another document in the Federal Register. The document will

include a discussion of any comments we receive and any amendments we

are making to the rule as a result of the comments.

Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this

action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review

process required by Executive Order 12866.

This rule restricts the interstate movement of regulated articles

from an area in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA. Within the

regulated area there are approximately 106 small entities that may be

affected by this rule. These include 2 distributors, 62 fruit sellers,

19 growers, 1 landfill, 18 nurseries, 1 packer, 1 processor, and 2

swapmeets. These 106 entities comprise less than 1 percent of the total

number of similar entities operating in the State of California.

Additionally, these small entities sell regulated articles primarily

for local intrastate, not interstate movement, so the effect, if any,

of this regulation on these entities appears to be minimal.

The effect on those few entities that do move regulated articles

interstate will be minimized by the availability of various treatments,

that, in most cases, will allow these small entities to move regulated

articles interstate with very little additional cost.

Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and

Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will

not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small

entities.

Executive Order 12372

This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic

Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,

which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local

officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)

Executive Order 12988

This interim rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,

Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws

and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no

retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings

before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.

National Environmental Policy Act

An environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact

have been prepared for this interim rule. The assessment provides a

basis for the conclusion that the methods employed to eradicate the

Mexican fruit fly will not present a risk of introducing or

disseminating plant pests and will not have a significant impact on the

quality of the human environment. Based on the finding of no

significant impact, the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health

Inspection Service has determined that an environmental impact

statement need not be prepared.

The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact

were prepared in accordance with: (1) The National Environmental Policy

Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2)

regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing

the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA

regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA

Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372).

Copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no

significant impact are available for public inspection at USDA, room

1141, South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except holidays. Persons wishing to inspect copies are requested to

call ahead on (202) 690-2817 to facilitate entry into the reading room.

In addition, copies may be obtained by writing to the individual listed

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This interim rule contains no information collection or

recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301

Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.

Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 301 as follows:

PART 301--DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES

1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 147a, 150bb, 150dd, 150ee, 150ff, 161, 162,

and 164-167; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(c).

2. In Sec. 301.64-3, paragraph (c) is amended by adding an entry

for California, in alphabetical order, to read as follows:

Sec. 301.64-3 Regulated areas.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

California

San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. That portion of San

Bernardino and Riverside Counties in the Bloomington area bounded by

a line drawn as follows: Beginning at the intersection of Sierra

Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; then east along Foothill Boulevard to

Meridian Avenue; then south along Meridian Avenue to Mill Street;

then east along Mill Street to Rancho Avenue; then south along

Rancho Avenue to Laurel Street; then east along Laurel Street to

Eighth Street; then south along Eighth Street to La Cadena Drive;

then south along La Cadena Drive to Interstate Highway 10; then east

along Interstate Highway 10 to Mount Vernon Avenue; then south along

Mount Vernon Avenue to Interstate Highway 215; then southwest along

Interstate Highway 215 to State Highway 91; then southwest along

State Highway 91 to Mission Inn Avenue; then northwest along Mission

Inn Avenue to Buena Vista Avenue; then northwest along Buena Vista

Avenue to Mission Boulevard; then northwest along Mission Boulevard

to Riverview Drive; then southwest along Riverview Drive to Limonite

Avenue; then southwest along Limonite Avenue to Camino Real; then

north along Camino Real to Red Mountain Drive; then west along Red

Mountain Drive to Longs Peak Drive; then southwest along Longs Peak

Drive to Tyrolite Street; then north along Tyrolite Street to Galena

Street; then west along Galena Street to Agate Street; then north

along Agate Street to Mission Boulevard; then west along Mission

Boulevard to Pedley Road; then north along Pedley Road to Granite

Hill Drive; then north along an imaginary line to the intersection

of Cherry Avenue and Live Oak Avenue; then north along Live Oak

Avenue to Boyle Avenue; then north along an imaginary line to the

intersection of Washington Drive and Live Oak Avenue; then north

along Live Oak Avenue to Valley Boulevard; then east along Valley

Boulevard to Fontana Avenue; then northeast along Fontana Avenue to

Citrus Avenue; then north along Citrus Avenue to Arrow Boulevard;

then east along Arrow Boulevard to Sierra Avenue; then north along

Sierra Avenue to the point of beginning.

* * * * *

Done in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of September 1999.

Bobby R. Acord,

Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

[FR Doc. 99-25178 Filed 9-27-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-34-U

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.