Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision; Kern County Air Pollution Control District; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 105-153a; FRL-6378-7]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California

State Implementation Plan Revision; Kern County Air Pollution Control

District; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; Ventura County

Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the

California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions concern rules

from the Kern County Air Pollution Control District (KCAPCD), the

Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD), and the Ventura

County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD). The rules control

oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from cement kilns and electric

power generating facilities. This approval action will incorporate

these three rules into the Federally approved SIP. The intended effect

of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of NOX in

accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in

1990 (CAA or the Act). Thus, EPA is finalizing the approval of these

revisions into the California SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding

EPA action on SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary

ambient air quality standards and plan requirements for nonattainment

areas.

DATES: These rules are effective on September 20, 1999 without further

notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 19, 1999. If EPA

receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal in the

Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take

effect.

[[Page 38833]]

ADDRESSES: Written comments must be submitted to Andrew Steckel at the

Region IX office listed below. Copies of the rules and EPA's evaluation

report of each rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region

9 office during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rules

are also available for inspection at the following locations:

Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105

Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street,

SW, Washington, DC 20460

California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814

Kern County Air Pollution Control District, 2700 M Street, Suite 302,

Bakersfield, CA 93301

Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, 15428 Civic Drive, Suite

200, Victorville, CA 92392-2383

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Rule Development

Section, 669 County Square Drive, Ventura, CA 93003

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Max Fantillo, Rulemaking Office (AIR-

4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, Telephone: (415) 744-

1183.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Applicability

The rules being approved into the California SIP include: KCAPCD's

Rule 425.3, Portland Cement Kilns (Oxide of Nitrogen); MDAQMD's Rule

1158, Electric Power Generating Facilities; and VCAPCD's Rule 59,

Electric Power Generating Equipment--Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions.

These rules were submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB)

to EPA on October 19, 1994 (Rule 425.3) and March 10, 1998 (Rule 1158

and Rule 59).

II. Background

On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA or

the Act) were enacted. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at

42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. The air quality planning requirements for the

reduction of NOX emissions through reasonably available

control technology (RACT) are set out in section 182(f) of the CAA. On

November 25, 1992, EPA published a proposed rule entitled ``State

Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the General

Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of Title I;

Proposed Rule,'' (the NOX Supplement) which describes the

requirements of section 182(f). The November 25, 1992, proposed rule

should be referred to for further information on the NOX

requirements and is incorporated into this document by reference.

Section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act requires States to apply the

same requirements to major stationary sources of NOX

(``major'' as defined in section 302 and section 182(c), (d), and (e))

as are applied to major stationary sources of volatile organic

compounds (VOCs), in moderate or above ozone nonattainment areas. Kern

County area is classified as serious; the Southeast Desert Air Basin

managed by MDAQMD and the Ventura County area are classified as severe;

1 therefore these areas were subject to the RACT

requirements of section 182(b)(2), cited below, and the November 15,

1992 deadline.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ Kern County area, Ventura County area, and Southeast Desert

Air Basin managed by MDAQMD retained their designations of

nonattainment and was classified by operation of law pursuant to

sections 107(d) and 181(a) upon the date of enactment of the CAA.

See 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 182(b)(2) requires submittal of RACT rules for major

stationary sources of VOC emissions (not covered by a pre-enactment

control techniques guidelines (CTG) document or a post-enactment CTG

document) by November 15, 1992. There were no NOX CTGs

issued before enactment and EPA has not issued a CTG document for any

NOX sources since enactment of the CAA. The RACT rules

covering NOX sources and submitted as SIP revisions, are

expected to require final installation of the actual NOX

controls as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than May 31,

1995.

The State of California submitted many RACT rules for incorporation

into its SIP on October 19, 1994, March 3 and 10, 1998 including the

rules being acted upon in this document. This document addresses EPA's

direct-final action for KCAPCD Rule 425.3, Portland Cement Kilns

(Oxides of Nitrogen); MDAQMD Rule 1158, Electric Power Generating

Facilities; and VCAPCD Rule 59, Electric Power Generating Equipment--

Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions. KCAPCD adopted Rule 425.3 on October 13,

1994, MDAQMD adopted Rule 1158 on August 25, 1997, and VCAPCD adopted

Rule 59 on July 15, 1997. The submitted KCAPCD's Rule 425.3 was found

to be complete on October 21, 1994; MDAQMD's Rule 1158 and VCAPCD's

Rule 59 were found to be complete on May 21, 1998 pursuant to EPA's

completeness criteria that are set forth in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V

2 and are being finalized for approval into the SIP. By

today's document, EPA is taking direct final action to approve these

rules into the Federally approved SIP.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\\ 2 EPA adopted the completeness criteria on February 16, 1990

(55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA,

revised the criteria on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOX emissions contribute to the production of ground

level ozone and smog. KCAPCD's Rule 425.3 controls emissions of

NOX from cement kilns; MDAQMD's Rule 1158 and VCAPCD's Rule

58 control emissions of NOX from electric power generating

facilities. These rules were adopted as part of KCAPCD's, MDAQMD's, and

VCAPCD's efforts to achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS) for ozone and in response to the CAA requirements cited above.

The following is EPA's evaluation and final action for these rules.

III. EPA Evaluation and Action

In determining the approvability of a NOX rule, EPA must

evaluate the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and

EPA regulations, as found in section 110, and part D of the CAA and 40

CFR part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption and Submittal of

Implementation Plans). The EPA interpretation of these requirements,

which forms the basis for this action, appears in various EPA policy

guidance documents.3 Among these provisions is the

requirement that a NOX rule must, at a minimum, provide for

the implementation of RACT for stationary sources of NOX

emissions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ Among other things, the pre-amendment guidance consists of

those portions of the proposed post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide

policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987); ``Issues

Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,

Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register

Notice'' (Blue Book) (notice of availability was published in the

Federal Register on May 25, 1988).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the purposes of assisting State and local agencies in

developing NOX RACT rules, EPA prepared the NOX

Supplement to the General Preamble, cited above (57 FR 55620). In the

NOX Supplement, EPA provides guidance on how RACT will be

determined for stationary sources of NOX emissions. While

most of the guidance issued by EPA on what constitutes RACT for

stationary sources has been directed towards application for VOC

sources, much of the guidance is also applicable to RACT for stationary

sources of NOX (see section 4.5 of the NOX

Supplement). In addition, pursuant to

[[Page 38834]]

section 183(c), EPA is issuing alternative control technique documents

(ACTs), that identify alternative controls for categories of stationary

sources of NOX. The ACT documents will provide information

on control technology for stationary sources that emit or have the

potential to emit 25 tons per year or more of NOX. However,

the ACTs will not establish a presumptive norm for what is considered

RACT for stationary sources of NOX. In general, the guidance

documents cited above, as well as other relevant and applicable

guidance documents, have been set forth to ensure that submitted

NOX RACT rules meet Federal RACT requirements and are fully

enforceable and strengthen or maintain the SIP.

There is currently no version of KCAPCD Rule 425.3, Portland Cement

Kilns in the SIP. Rule 425.3 controls NOX emissions from

Portland cement kilns operated within the Kern County area. The

submitted rule includes the following provisions: applicability,

exemptions, definitions, emission limits, compliance determination and

monitoring, recordkeeping, test methods, and compliance schedule.

EPA developed alternative control technique (ACT) documents for

categories of stationary sources that either emit or have the potential

to emit 25 tons per year or more of NOX, to assist states in

making RACT determinations. However, the ACTs do not establish a

presumptive norm for what is considered RACT for stationary sources of

NOX. Cement kilns have been identified as a major stationary

source that emit more than 25 tons of NOX per year. The ACT

for cement kilns provides technical information for use by state and

local agencies to develop and implement regulatory programs to control

NOX emissions from cement manufacturing operations. The ACT

reports a range of NOX emission factors from 0.90 to 19.5

lbs./ton for different cement kiln types and processes.

Rule 425.3 sets RACT NOX emission limits at 11.6 lbs./

ton of clinker produced averaged on a 24 consecutive hour period and/or

at 6.4 lbs./ton of clinker produced averaged on a 30 consecutive day

period. These limits were set based on initial source tests and are

comparable to other district NOX emission limits for cement

kilns; they are within the ACT NOX emissions factors (0.90-

19.5 lbs./ton) for cement manufacturing operation.

When reviewing rules for SIP approvability, EPA evaluates

enforceability elements such as test methods, recordkeeping, and

compliance determinations in addition to RACT emission limits. Rule

425.3 strengthens the SIP with enforceable measures such as

applicability, definition, emission limits, recordkeeping, test

methods, and compliance schedule. Therefore, Rule 425.3 meets the

federal RACT by meeting the above requirements.

In evaluating the rule, EPA must determine whether the CAA

requirement that RACT will be implemented by May 31, 1995 is met. The

rule requires final compliance by May 31, 1995. Kilns that need to

retrofit are allowed full compliance by May 31, 1997. Rule 425.3 meets

EPA's RACT guideline and May 31, 1995 implementation requirements by

requiring RACT be implemented by May 1997 and interim measures

including submission of a compliance plan, and an application for

authority to construct, are met to ensure progress toward final

compliance with the rule.

There is currently no version of MDAQMD's Rule 1158, Electric Power

Generating Facilities in the SIP. Rule 1158 controls NOX

emissions from electric power generating facilities within the

Southeastern Desert Air Basin managed by MDAQMD. The submitted rule

includes the following provisions: applicability, emission limits,

exemptions, monitoring requirements, recordkeeping, averaging time,

test methods, definitions, and compliance schedule.

EPA established RACT emission levels for electric utility boilers

and recommended for other source categories that States/Districts make

RACT determinations comparable to those EPA established for electric

utility boilers. This comparability should be based on several factors

including cost, cost-effectiveness, and emission reductions.

The CARB RACT/BARCT Guidance 4 document for stationary

gas turbines suggests the NOX limits of 42 ppm (gas-fired)

and 65 ppm (liquid-fired) for units rated 0.30 MW and greater. EPA has

used the NOX Supplement to the General Preamble

(NOX Supplement) document and the CARB's RACT/BARCT Guidance

for gas turbines in evaluating Rule 1158 for consistency with the CAA's

RACT requirements.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ Determination of Reasonably Available Control Technology and

Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for gas turbines (RACT/

BARCT Guidance for stationary gas turbines), California Air

Resources Board, May 18, 1992.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The RACT limits for utility boilers range 0.20-0.30 pounds of

NOX per million Btu (lbs./MMBtu) (167-251 ppm)

for burning gaseous and liquid fuels. The emission limits in CARB's

RACT/BARCT determination (42/65 ppm) are generally comparable to those

specified in the NOX Supplement for electric utility

boilers.

Rule 1158's NOX emission limits ((70-125 ppm) gas-fired

and (115-225 ppm) liquid-fired) for boilers, and (42 ppm (gas-fired)

and 65 ppm (liquid-fired) for combined-cycle gas turbines are below or

within the NOX Supplement allowable emission limits (167-251

ppm) for electric utility boilers and the CARB's RACT/BARCT Guidance

emission limits (42/65 ppm) for gas turbines. The rule is generally

consistent with EPA guidelines and CARB's RACT/BARCT Guidance

requirements. The rule contains enforceability measures such as

applicability, emission limits, exemptions, monitoring requirements,

recordkeeping, averaging time, test methods, definitions, and

compliance schedule. The rule also requires final compliance with the

emission limits by May 31, 1995. Therefore, Rule 1158 meets the federal

RACT guidance and the May 31, 1995 implementation deadline by meeting

the above requirements.

On January 22, 1997, EPA approved into the SIP a version of Rule

59, Electric Power Generating Equipment that had been revised by VCAPCD

on October 12, 1993. Revisions to this rule were subsequently adopted

on July 15, 1997 and submitted to EPA. VCAPCD's submitted Rule 59,

Electric Power Generating Equipment--Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions

includes the following significant changes from the current SIP:

Rule 59 has been revised so it will apply to any owner/

operator of electric power generating steam boilers within VCAPCD area;

A threshold heat input capacity greater than 300 million

British Thermal Unit per hour (MMBtu/hr) has been added;

The NOX emission limits have been changed to a

uniform and more stringent limit of 0.10 pounds per megawatt hour

(lbs./MW-hr);

The use of continuous emission monitoring (CEM) system to

determine compliance has been added;

Compliance period has been changed from the rolling

twenty-four hours to an hourly average not to exceed twenty-four hours;

Use of 40 CFR 75.10(d)(1) provisions in lieu of the hourly

calculation of NOX emission rates;

Clarification of the 96-hours exemption during fuel oil

system tests;

Recordkeeping has been increased from four to five years;

Deletion of extraneous provisions and obsolete

requirements in the rule; and

[[Page 38835]]

Other minor changes of the rule to improve clarity.

When reviewing rules for SIP approvability, EPA evaluates

enforceability elements such as test methods, recordkeeping, and

compliance determinations as well as RACT emission limits. All these

elements are already in the SIP-approved version of the rule. The

revised rule is more stringent than the SIP approved version of the

rule, which was previously determined to meet RACT requirements. EPA

believes the addition of 300 MMBtu/hr applicability cut-off and the

changing of the compliance period from a 24-hour averaging to a

flexible hourly average is not a relaxation restricted under 110(l) of

the Act because the heat rate ratings of the existing units affected by

this amendment are much higher than the 300 MMBtu/hr cut-off and the

hourly averaging is more stringent than the 24-hour average compliance

period. The additional reduction obtained beyond those attributable to

RACT are assumed necessary for VCAPCD's attainment planning purposes.

A more detailed discussion of the sources controlled, the controls

required, and the justification for why these controls represent RACT

can be found in the Technical Support Documents (TSDs) for KCAPCD's

Rule 425.3, MDAQMD's Rule 1158, and VCAPCD's Rule 59 dated June 1,

1999.

EPA has evaluated the submitted rules and has determined that they

are consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations and EPA policy. Therefore,

KCAPCD's Rule 425.3, Portland Cement Kilns (Oxides of Nitrogen),

MDAQMD's Rule 1158, Electric Power Generating Facilities, and VCAPCD's

Rule 59, Electric Power Generating Equipment--Oxides of Nitrogen

Emissions are being approved under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as

meeting the requirements of section 110(a), section 182(b)(2), section

182(f) and the NOX Supplement to the General Preamble.

EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this

Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document

that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should

adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective September 20,

1999 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments

by August 19, 1999.

If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a timely

withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule

will not take effect. All public comments received will then be

addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The

EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule. Any

parties interested in commenting on this rule should do so at this

time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this

rule will be effective on September 20, 1999 and no further action will

be taken on the proposed rule.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this

regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, Regulatory

Planning and Review.

B. Executive Order 12875

Under Executive Order 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental

Partnership, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not required by

statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, local or tribal

government, unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary

to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those governments, or

EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by consulting,

Executive Order 12875 requires EPA to provide to the Office of

Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior

consultation with representatives of affected State, local and tribal

governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written

communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the

need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875

requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected

officials and other representatives of State, local and tribal

governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development

of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.''

Today's rule does not create a mandate on State, local or tribal

governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these

entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875

do not apply to this rule.

C. Executive Order 13045

Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety

Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is

determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O.

12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA

has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children.

If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate

the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on

children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other

potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered

by the Agency. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it is

does not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or

safety risks.

D. Executive Order 13084

Under Executive Order 13084, Consultation and Coordination with

Indian Tribal Governments, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not

required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the

communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial

direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal

government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance

costs incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults with those

governments. If EPA complies by consulting, Executive Order 13084

requires EPA to provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a

separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a

description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with

representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature

of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the

regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop

an effective process permitting elected officials and other

representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful

and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters

that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule

does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian

tribal governments. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of

E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency

to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to

notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies

that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small

businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental

jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a

substantial number of small

[[Page 38836]]

entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part

D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply

approve requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore,

because the Federal SIP approval does not create any new requirements,

I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact

on a substantial number of small entities. Moreover, due to the nature

of the Federal-State relationship under the Clean Air Act, preparation

of flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the

economic reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA

to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric

Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

F. Unfunded Mandates

Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA

must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or

final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated

annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate;

or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA

must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative

that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with

statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan

for informing and advising any small governments that may be

significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not

include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of

$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in

the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves

pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new

requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or

tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.

G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally

provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating

the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,

to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the

United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other

required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior

to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a

``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

H. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for

judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court

of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 20, 1999. Filing a

petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule

does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such

rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings

to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen

dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile

organic compound.

Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation

Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the

Federal Register on July 1, 1982.

Dated: June 29, 1999.

Laura K. Yoshii,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is

amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(202)(i)(B),

(c)(254)(i)(H)(2) and (c)(254)(i)(K) to read as follows:

Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(202) * * *

(i) * * *

(B) Kern County Air Pollution Control District.

(1) Rule 425.3, adopted on October 13, 1994.

* * * * *

(254) * * *

(i) * * *

(H) * * *

(2) Rule 1158, adopted on February 22, 1995 and amended on August

25, 1997.

* * * * *

(K) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.

(1) Rule 59, adopted on October 6, 1969 and amended on July 15,

1997.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 99-18360 Filed 7-19-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P