Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Tennessee: Approval of Revisions to the Tennessee SIP Regarding National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Volatile Organic Compounds
Federal RegisterJul 19, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[TN-207-1-9924a; TN-214-1-9925a; FRL-6379-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Tennessee:
Approval of Revisions to the Tennessee SIP Regarding National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Volatile Organic Compounds
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving revisions to Rule 1200-3-2-.01 and Rule
1200-3-9-.01 of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan (SIP) that were
submitted to EPA by the Tennessee Department of Air Pollution Control
(TDAPC), on June 16, 1998 and February 11, 1999. Rule 1200-3-2-.01 is
revised to include a definition for national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPs). Rule 1200-3-9-.01 is revised to
incorporate by reference the definition for volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) contained in 40 CFR part 51, subpart F.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective September 17, 1999 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by August 18, 1999.
If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to: Allison Humphris at the
EPA, Region 4 Air Planning Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303.
Copies of the state submittal(s) are available at the following
addresses for inspection during normal business hours:
Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (Air Docket 6102),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC
20460.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Air Planning Branch, 61
Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Allison Humphris, 404/
562-9030.
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of
Air Pollution Control, L & C Annex, 9th Floor, 401 Church Street,
Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1531. 615/532-0554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Humphris at 404/562-9030.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The EPA is approving revisions to Rules 1200-3-2-.01 and 1200-3-
9-.01 of the Tennessee SIP. Rule 1200-3-2-.01 is amended to include a
subparagraph establishing a definition for NESHAPs. Rule 1200-3-9-.01
is revised to incorporate by reference an updated definition for VOCs
contained in 40 CFR part 51, subpart F.
II. Analysis of State's Submittal
Rule 1200-3-2-.01 is being amended to include the following
definition for NESHAPs: ``standards for the emissions of hazardous air
pollutants promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency and published in the Federal Register.'' The purpose
for this addition is to ensure that the Tennessee SIP includes an
accurate description of these emission standards, which are applied to
new major sources and modifications through implementation of the
construction permitting programs that were approved into the SIP via
Rule 1200-3-2.
The definition for VOCs in Rule 1200-3-9-.01 is revised to be
consistent with the definition for this term that was approved by EPA
on October 8, 1996 (61 FR 52848). The revision adds HFC 43-10mee and
HCFC 225ca and cb to the list of compounds excluded from the definition
of VOCs on the basis that these compounds have negligible contribution
to tropospheric ozone formation. The definition is revised for use in
preparing SIPs to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) for ozone under Title I of the Clean Air Act.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the SIP because they
are consistent with Clean Air Act and EPA requirements.
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register
[[Page 38581]]
publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as
the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be
filed. This rule will be effective September 17, 1999 without further
notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by August 18, 1999.
If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on September 17, 1999 and
no further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, entitled
``Regulatory Planning and Review.''
B. Executive Order 12875
Under Executive Order 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is
not required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, local
or tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those
governments, or EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by
consulting, Executive Order 12875 requires EPA to provide to the Office
of Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior
consultation with representatives of affected State, local and tribal
governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the
need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected
officials and other representatives of State, local and tribal
governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development
of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.''
Today's rule does not create a mandate on State, local or tribal
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of Executive
Order 12875 do not apply to this rule.
C. Executive Order 13084
Under Executive Order 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is
not required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults with those
governments. If EPA complies by consulting, Executive Order 13084
requires EPA to provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a
separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the
regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop
an effective process permitting elected officials and other
representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful
and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters
that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.''
Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Indian tribal governments. Accordingly, the requirements
of section 3(b) of Executive Order 13084 do not apply to this rule.
D. Executive Order 13045
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O.
12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA
has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children.
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate
the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on
children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered
by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does not involve
decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or safety risks.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create
any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is
already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not
create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the
Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
F. Unfunded Mandates
Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate;
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves
pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
[[Page 38582]]
G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
H. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 17, 1999. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 14, 1999.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Chapter I, title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, is amended as
follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR--Tennessee
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by revising the entries for
Section 1200-3-2-.01 and Section 1200-3-9-.01 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) EPA approved regulations.
EPA Approved Tennessee Regulations for Tennessee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA approval
State citation Title/subject Adoption date date Federal Register notice
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 1200-3-2-.01......... General Definitions.............. 07/29/93 7/19/99......... [64 FR 38582
* * * * * * *
Section 1200-3-9-.01......... Construction Permits............. 01/26/99 7/19/99......... [64 FR 38582
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 99-18043 Filed 7-16-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.