Pain Stops Here!, Inc., et al.; Analysis To Aid Public Comment
Federal RegisterJul 1, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 9823175]
Pain Stops Here!, Inc., et al.; Analysis To Aid Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft
complaint that accompanies the consent agreement and the terms of the
consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle
these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 30, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary,
Room 159, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christa V.A. Vecchi, FTC/H-263, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46, and Section 2.34 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given
that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order
to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to
final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record
for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the
allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of
the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page
(for June 24, 1999), on the World Wide Web, at ``http://www.ftc.gov/os/
actions97.htm.'' A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public
Reference Room, Room H-130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC
20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-3627.
Public comment is invited. Comments should be directed to: FTC/
Office of the Secretary, Room 159, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20580. Two paper copies of each comment should be filed,
and should be accompanied, if possible, by a 3\1/2\ inch diskette
containing an electronic copy of the comment. Such comments or views
will be considered by the Commission and will be available for
inspection and copying at its principal office in accordance with
Section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR
4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has accepted, subject to final
approval, an agreement to a proposed Consent Order (``proposed order'')
from Pain Stops Here! Inc. and Sande R. Caplin, the President and
majority shareholder of the corporation.
The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for
sixty (60) days for the reception of comments by interested persons.
Comments received during this period will become part of the public
record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the
agreement and will decide whether it should withdraw from the agreement
or make final the agreement's proposed order.
This matter concerns Internet and print advertisements disseminated
directly to consumers as well as through distributors and retail
stores, including drug store, health food stores, sporting goods
stores, health care products stores, and private individuals working
out of their homes. These products contain magnets that purportedly
treat or alleviate a variety of medical problems, including cancer,
liver disease, heart disease, and arthritis. Proposed respondents'
magnetic products include an assortment of devices, such as sleep pad,
pillow insert, and magnetized water ceramic magnetic ring.
The Commission's complaint charges that the proposed respondents
engaged in deceptive advertising in violation of Sections 5 and 12 of
the FTC Act by making unsubstantiated claims that its magnetic therapy
products: (1) Are effective in treating cancer; (2) cure liver disease
and other diseased internal organs; (3) are effective in reducing
cholesterol deposits in the arteries and veins and normalizing the
circulatory system; (4) are effective in breaking up kidney and
gallbladder stones and in the prevention of further formation of
stones; (5) are effective in treating infectious disease, urinary
infection, gastric ulcers, dysentery, diarrhea, skin ulcers, and bed
sores; (6) prevent and reverse heart disease, circulatory disease,
arthritis, auto-immune illness, neuro-degenerative disease, and
allergies; (7) are effective in treating arthritis, bursitis,
tendinitis, sprains, strains, sciatica, lameness, navicular, and foot
growth problems in animals; (8) stimulate the body's production of
[[Page 35666]]
the hormone Melatonin; (9) are effective in treating pain caused by
conditions such as arthritis, bursitis, and sciatica; and (10) are
effective in stimulating growth in plants causing them to grow 20 to 40
percent faster.
The complaint further alleges that proposed respondents represented
that studies prove that proposed respondents' magnetic products are
effective in the mitigation and treatment of pain caused by conditions
such as arthritis, bursitis, and sciatica. The proposed complaint
alleges that respondents lack substantiation for this claim.
The proposed order contains provisions designed to remedy the
violations charged and to prevent proposed respondents from engaging in
similar acts in the future.
Paragraph I of the proposed order prohibits proposed respondents
from representing that their magnetic therapy products (defined as any
product that contains a magnet of any kind purporting to relieve the
symptoms of, treat, mitigate, cure, relieve, heal or alleviate any
disease or health condition): (1) Are effective in the treatment of
cancer; (2) cure liver disease or other diseased internal organs; (3)
are effective in the reduction of cholesterol deposits in the arteries
and veins or normalizing the circulatory system; (4) are effective in
breaking up kidney or gallbladder stones or in the prevention of
further formation of stones; (5) are effective in the mitigation or
treatment of infectious diseases, urinary infection, gastric ulcers,
dysentery, diarrhea, skin ulcers, or bed sores; (6) prevent or reverse
heart disease, circulatory disease, arthritis, auto-immune illness,
neuro-degenerative disease, or allergies; (7) are effective in the
mitigation or treatment of arthritis, bursitis, tendinitis, sprains,
strains, sciatica, lameness, navicular, and foot growth problems in
animals; (8) stimulate the body's production of the hormone Melatonin;
(9) are effective in the mitigation or treatment of pain caused by
conditions such as arthritis, bursitis, and sciatica; or (10) are
effective in stimulating significant growth in plants, unless, at the
time the representation is made, respondents possess and rely upon
competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the
representation.
Paragraph II of the proposed order prohibits proposed respondents
from misrepresenting the existence, contents, validity, results,
conclusions, or interpretations of any test, study, or research.
Paragraph III of the proposed order prohibits proposed respondents
from making any representation about the health benefits, performance,
or efficacy of any product or program, unless, at the time the
representation is made, respondents possess and rely upon competent and
reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.
Paragraph IV of the proposed order prohibits proposed respondents
from: (1) Disseminating to any distributor any material containing any
claims prohibited by the order; and (2) authorizing any distributor to
make any representations prohibited by the order. In addition,
Paragraph IV requires proposed respondents to (1) send a notice to
distributors with whom they have done business since January 1, 1998,
announcing their settlement with the FTC, and requiring distributors to
submit all proposed promotional and marketing materials to proposed
respondents for review prior to their dissemination; (2) send, for a
period of three years, the same notice to future distributors with whom
proposed respondents do business; (3) monitor distributors' promotional
activities; (4) terminate, as appropriate, the right of any distributor
to market PSH products or programs who continues to use promotional
materials or make oral representations that violate the order, (5)
provide the FTC all relevant information about the distributors who
continue to engage in activities that violate the order, and (6) review
all marketing materials before distributors disseminate them to the
public.
Paragraph V contains record keeping requirements for the
notification letters sent to distributors, communications between
respondents and distributors referring or relating to the requirements
of Paragraph IV of the order, and any other materials created pursuant
to Paragraph IV.
Paragraph VI of the proposed order contains record keeping
requirements for materials that substantiate, qualify, or contradict
covered claims and requires the proposed respondents to keep and
maintain all advertisements and promotional materials containing any
representation covered by the proposed order. In addition, Paragraph
VII requires distribution of a copy of the consent decree to current
and future officers and agents. Further, Paragraph VIII provides for
Commission notification upon a change in the corporate respondents.
Paragraph IX requires proposed respondent Sande R. Caplin to notify the
Commission when he discontinues his current business or employment and
of his affiliation with any new business or employment. The proposed
order, in Paragraph X, also requires the filing of a compliance report.
Finally, Paragraph XI of the proposed order provides for the
termination of the order after twenty years under certain
circumstances.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
proposed order, and it is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the agreement and proposed order, or to modify in any
way their terms.
By direction of the Commission.
Benjamin I. Berman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 99-16710 Filed 6-30-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.