Privacy Act; Proposed New System of Records
Federal RegisterJun 24, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-4456-N-02]
Privacy Act; Proposed New System of Records
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Establish a new system of records.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) proposes
to establish a new record system to add to its inventory of systems of
records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
The proposed new system of record is entitled Compliance Case Tracking
System (CCTS-F73), HUD/EC-01. This system of records contains
information on individuals, corporations, partnerships, associations,
unit of government or legal entities who have been suspended, or
debarred, or who are ineligible to participate in HUD programs or those
whose records of participation in HUD programs are being reviewed for
possible administrative actions to exclude them from further
participation.
DATES: Effective date: This action shall be effective without further
notice in 30 calendar days (July 24, 1999) unless comments are received
during or before this period that would result in a contrary
determination.
Comments due by: July 26, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this new system of records to the Rules Docket Clerk, Office of General
Counsel, room 10276, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Communications should
refer to the above docket number and title. An original and four copies
of comments should be submitted. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not
acceptable. A copy of each communication submitted will be available
for public inspection and copying between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m.
weekdays at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Smith, Departmental Privacy
Act Officer, Telephone Number (202) 708-2374, or Richard Delaubansels,
Compliance Analyst, Telephone Number (202) 708-3041 extension 3569.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5
U.S.C. 552a), as amended notice is given that HUD proposes to establish
a new system of records identified as HUD/EC-01, Compliance Case
Tracking System (CCTS-F73).
Title 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11) provide that the public be
afforded a 30-day period in which to comment on the new record system.
The new system report was submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, and the
House Committee on Government Operations pursuant to paragraph 4c of
Appendix 1 to OMB Circular No. A-130, ``Federal Responsibilities for
Maintaining Records About Individuals,'' July 25, 1994; 59 FR 37914.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a 88 Stat. 1896; 342 U.S.C. 3535(d).
Dated: June 14, 1999.
Glorida R. Parker,
Chief Information Officer.
HUD/EC-01
System name:
Compliance Case Tracking System (CCTS--F73).
System location:
HUD Computer Center, Lanham, Maryland.
Categories of individuals covered by the system:
Any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of
government or legal entity, however organized,--except; foreign
governments or foreign governmental entities, public international
organizations, foreign government owned (in whole or in part) or
controlled entities, and entities consisting wholly or partially to
foreign governments or foreign governmental entities--proposed for
debarment, suspended, debarred, or voluntarily excluded government-
wide, unless otherwise noted, from Federal procurement and sales
programs, non-procurement programs, and financial benefits. An
exclusion may be based on the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.4;
Federal Property Management Regulation (FPMR) 101-45.6; Government
Printing Office (GPO) Instruction 110.11 A; U.S. Postal Service (PS)
Publication 41; the Non-procurement Common rule; or the authority of a
statute, Executive Orders 12549 and 12689 or regulation applying to
procurement or non-procurement programs. Following are some examples of
individuals or persons (proposed for debarment, debarred, suspended, or
voluntarily excluded): participants who are direct or indirect
recipients of HUD funds; and those who represent entities such as
contractors or corporations who are participants in HUD FHA assisted or
sponsored programs including mortgage insurance programs.
Categories of records in the system:
The automated database contains pertinent information obtained from
hard copy compliance case files. These automated records contain, but
are not limited to: Names; addresses of all persons proposed for
debarment; persons debarred, suspended, or excluded by a Limited Denial
of Participation (LDP) action; cross-references when more than one name
is involved in a single action; the type of action; the cause of the
action; the scope of the action; any termination date for each listed
action; and the agency name and telephone number of the agency point of
contact for the action. The system also contains records of referrals
for administrative sanction action where action is pending or where no
action was taken.
Authority for maintenance of the system:
Executive Orders 12549 and 12689; U.S.C. 31, 41, and 42.
[[Page 33901]]
Purpose(s):
To the extent permitted by law, executive departments and agencies
shall participate in a government-wide system for the following
purposes: (1) To exclude from Federal financial and non-financial
assistance and benefits under Federal programs and activities those who
have been debarred or suspended; and (2) to include in the List of
Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs
all persons proposed for debarment, debarred, suspended, or excluded by
a Limited Denial of Participation (LDP).
Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories
of users and the purposes of such uses:
In addition to those disclosures generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
552a(b) of the Privacy Act, these records, or information contained
therein, may specifically be disclosed outside of the agency as routine
use pursuant to 5 U.SC. 552a(b)(3) as follows, provided that no routine
use listed shall be construed to limit or waive any other routine use
specified herein:
(a) Internal Revenue Service (IRS)--for the purpose of effecting an
administrative offset against the debtor for a delinquent debt owed to
the U.S. Government by the debtor.
(b) Department of Justice (DOJ)--for prosecution of fraud, and for
the institution of suit or other proceedings to effect collection of
claims.
(c) General Accounting Office (GAO)--for further collection action
on any delinquent account when circumstances warrant.
(d) Outside collection agencies and credit bureaus--for the purpose
of either adding to a credit history file or obtaining a credit history
file on an individual for use in the administration of debt collection
for further collection action.
(e) U.S. General Services Administration (GSA)--for compilation and
maintenance of a List of Parties Excluded From Federal Procurement and
Non-procurement Programs in accordance with a recommendation from the
Interagency Committee on Debarment and Suspension, and identification
and monthly distribution of a list of those parties excluded throughout
the U.S. Government (unless otherwise noted) from receiving Federal
contracts or certain subcontracts and from certain types of federal
financial and non-financial assistance and benefits.
Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining,
and disposing of records in the system:
Storage:
The automated records are stored and saved in access files in the
CCTS (F73 System).
Retrievability:
These records are retrieved by names of individuals and companies.
Safeguards:
The automated records are stored and saved in limited access files
in the CCTS (F73 System) and available only to those persons whose
official duties require such access.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL
CCTS (F73 System) users, in accordance with internal retention
procedures, maintain records relating to each suspension or debarment
action taken by the Agency. Automated records are retained in the CCTS
(F73 System) and kept up to date.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Director, Departmental Enforcement Center, 1250 Maryland Avenue,
Southwest, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20024.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
For information, assistance, or inquiry about the existence of
records, contact the Privacy Act Officer at HUD, 451 7th Street, SW,
room P8202, Washington, DC 20410, in accordance with the procedures in
24 CFR Part 16.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
The Department's rule for providing access to records to the
individual concerned appear in 24 CFR, part 16. If additional
information or assistance is required, contact the Privacy Act Officer
at HUD, 451 7th Street SW, room P8202, Washington, DC 20410.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
The Department's rules for contesting the contents of records and
appealing initial denials, by the individual concerned appear in 24
CFR, part 16. If additional information or assistance is needed, it may
be obtained by contacting: (i) In relation to contesting contents of
records, the Privacy Act Officer at HUD, 451 7th Street, SW, room
P8202, Washington, DC 20410; and (ii) in relation to appeals of initial
denials, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD),
Departmental Privacy Appeals Officer, Office of General Counsel, HUD,
451 Seventh Street, Southwest, Washington, DC 20410.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
IInformation in this system of records is obtained from any source
which has information to provide concerning the existence of a cause
for administrative sanction. Examples of record sources include, but
are not limited to HUD employees, Federal government agencies, non-
federal government agencies, Federal and state courts, financial
institutions, state and local law enforcement offices, and regulatory
or licensing agencies.
EXEMPTIONS FOR CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE ACT:
None.
[FR Doc. 99-16135 Filed 6-23-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.