Proposed Exemptions; RREEF America L.L.C. (RREEF)

Federal RegisterJun 3, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

[Application No. D09708, et al.]

Proposed Exemptions; RREEF America L.L.C. (RREEF)

AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Exemptions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains notices of pendency before the

Department of Labor (the Department) of proposed exemptions from

certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) and/or the Internal

Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).

Written Comments and Hearing Requests

Unless otherwise stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, all

interested persons are invited to submit written comments, and with

respect to exemptions involving the fiduciary prohibitions of section

406(b) of the Act, requests for hearing within 45 days from the date of

publication of this Federal Register Notice. Comments and requests for

a hearing should state: (1) The name, address, and telephone number of

the person making the comment or request, and (2) the nature of the

person's interest in the exemption and the manner in which the person

would be adversely affected by the exemption. A request for a hearing

must also state the issues to be addressed and include a general

description of the evidence to be presented at the hearing.

ADDRESSES: All written comments and request for a hearing (at least

three copies) should be sent to the Pension and Welfare Benefits

Administration, Office of Exemption Determinations, Room N-5649, U.S.

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210.

Attention: Application No. stated in each Notice of Proposed Exemption.

The applications for exemption and the comments received will be

available for public inspection in the Public Documents Room of Pension

and Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-

5507, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210.

Notice to Interested Persons

Notice of the proposed exemptions will be provided to all

interested persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the

Department within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal

Register. Such notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed

exemption as published in the Federal Register and shall inform

interested persons of their right to comment and to request a hearing

(where appropriate).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed exemptions were requested in

applications filed pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section

4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in

29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).

Effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4

of 1978 (43 FR 47713, October 17, 1978) transferred the authority of

the Secretary of the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested

to the Secretary of Labor. Therefore, these notices of proposed

exemption are issued solely by the Department.

The applications contain representations with regard to the

proposed exemptions which are summarized below. Interested persons are

referred to the applications on file with the Department for a complete

statement of the facts and representations.

[[Page 29896]]

RREEF America L.L.C. (RREEF), Located in San Francisco, California

[Application No. D-9708]

Proposed Exemption

The Department is considering granting an exemption under the

authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the

Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part

2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990.)

Part I--Exemption for Payment of Certain Fees to RREEF

The restrictions of sections 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act and

the taxes imposed by section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section

4975(c)(1)(E) of the Code, shall not apply, effective as of (i) May 16,

1994, with respect to a single client, separate account established on

behalf of the Shell Pension Trust (the Shell Account), and (ii) the

date the final exemption is published in the Federal Register, with

respect to any single client, separate account (Single Client Account)

or any multiple client account (Multiple Client Account) formed on, or

after, such a date, to the payment of certain initial investment fees

(the Investment Fee), annual management fees based upon net operating

income (the Asset Management Fee), and performance fees (the

Performance Fee) to RREEF by employee benefit plans for which RREEF

provides investment management services (the Client Plans) 1

pursuant to an investment management agreement (the Agreement) entered

into between RREEF and the Client Plans either individually, through an

establishment (or amendment) of a Single Client Account, or

collectively as participants in a newly established Multiple Client

Account (collectively, the Accounts), provided that the conditions set

forth below in Part III are satisfied.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ The Client Plans (including employee benefit plans that may

become Client Plans in the future) consist of various pension plans

as defined in section 3(2) of the Act and other plans as defined in

section 4975(e)(1) of the Code with respect to which RREEF serves as

a trustee or an investment manager.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II--Exemption for Investments in a Multiple Client Account

The restrictions of section 406(a)(1)(A) through (D) of the Act and

the taxes imposed by section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (D) of the Code,

shall not apply to any investment by a Client Plan in a Multiple Client

Account managed by RREEF formed on, or after, the date the final

exemption is published in the Federal Register, provided that the

conditions set forth below in Part III are satisfied.

Part III--General Conditions

(a)(1) The investment of plan assets in a Single or Multiple Client

Account, including the terms and payment of any Investment Fee, Asset

Management Fee and Performance Fee (collectively; the Fees), shall be

approved in writing by a fiduciary of a Client Plan which is

independent of RREEF and its affiliates (the Independent Fiduciary).

(2) For purposes of the Fees, the fair market value of the

Accounts' real property assets (other than in the case of actual sales)

will be based on appraisals prepared by independent qualified

appraisers that are Members of the Appraisal Institute (MAI

Appraisers). In this regard, every agreement by which an appraiser is

retained will include the appraiser's representation that: (1) Its

ultimate client is the Account and its underlying Client Plan (and non-

Plan) investors, and (2) it will perform its duties in the interest of

such Account (and investors). In addition, following the date this

proposed exemption is granted, every agreement shall advise the

appraiser that it owes a professional obligation to the Account when

making an appraisal for properties held by the Account.

(b) The terms of any investment in an Account and of the Fees,

shall be at least as favorable to the Client Plans as those obtainable

in arm's-length transactions between unrelated parties.

(c) At the time any Account is established (or amended) and at the

time of any subsequent investment of assets (including the reinvestment

of assets) in such Account:

(1) Each Client Plan in a Single Client Account shall have total

net assets with a value in excess of $100 million, and each Client Plan

that is an investor in a Multiple Client Account shall have total net

assets with a value in excess of $50 million; and provided that

seventy-five percent (75%) or more of the units of beneficial interests

in a Multiple Client Account are held by Client Plans or other

investors having total assets of at least $100 million. In addition, 50

percent (50%) or more of the Client Plans investing in a Multiple

Client Account shall have assets of at least $100 million. A group of

Client Plans maintained by a single employer or controlled group of

employers, any of which individually has assets of less than $100

million, will be counted as a single Client Plan if the decision to

invest in the Account (or the decision to make investments in the

Account available as an option for an individually directed account) is

made by a fiduciary other than RREEF, who exercises such discretion

with respect to Client Plan assets in excess of $100 million.

(2) No Client Plan shall invest, in the aggregate, more than 5% of

its total assets in any Account or more than 10% of its total assets in

all Accounts established by RREEF.

(d) Prior to making an investment in any Account (or amending an

existing Account), the Independent Fiduciary of each Client Plan

investing in an Account shall have received offering materials from

RREEF which disclose all material facts concerning the purpose,

structure, and operation of the Account, including any Fee arrangements

(provided that, in the case of an amendment to the Fee arrangements,

such materials need address only the amended fees and any other

material change to the Account's original offering materials).

(e) With respect to its ongoing participation in an Account, each

Client Plan shall receive the following written information from RREEF:

(1) Audited financial statements of the Account prepared by

independent public accountants selected by RREEF no later than 90 days

after the end of the fiscal year of the Account;

(2) Quarterly and annual reports prepared by RREEF relating to the

overall financial position and operating results of the Account and, in

the case of a Multiple Client Account, the value of each Client Plan's

interest in the Account. Each such report shall include a statement

regarding the amount of fees paid to RREEF during the period covered by

such report;

(3) Periodic appraisals (as agreed upon with the Client Plans)

indicating the fair market value of the Account's assets as established

by an MAI appraiser independent of RREEF and its affiliates. In the

case of any appraisal that will serve as the basis for any ``deemed

sale'' of such property for purposes of calculating the Performance Fee

payable to RREEF (as discussed in paragraph (j) below), then:

(i) In the case of any Single Client Account, such MAI appraiser

shall be either (A) Selected by the Independent Fiduciary of the Client

Plan subject to the affirmative approval of RREEF, or (B) selected by

RREEF subject to approval by the Independent Fiduciary of the Client

Plan;

(ii) In the case of any Multiple Client Account, such MAI appraiser

shall be approved in advance by the Responsible Independent Fiduciaries

(as defined in Part IV(e) below) owning a majority of the interests in

the Accounts, determined according to the latest

[[Page 29897]]

valuation of the Account's assets performed no more than 12 months

prior to such appraisal, which approval may be by written notice and

deemed consent by such Fiduciaries' failure to object to the appraiser

within 30 days of such notice; and

(iii) In either case, the selected MAI appraiser shall acknowledge

in writing that the Client Plan(s) and other investors (in the case of

a Multiple Client Account), rather than RREEF, is (are) its clients,

and that in performing its services for the Account it shall act in the

sole interest of such Client Plan(s) and other investors. In addition,

following the date this proposed exemption is granted, every appraiser

selected shall acknowledge that it owes a professional obligation to

the Client Plan(s) and other investors in the Account in performing its

services as an appraiser for properties in the Account. If an MAI

appraiser selected by RREEF, or an appraisal performed by a previously

approved appraiser, is rejected by the Independent Fiduciary for a

Single Client Account or the Responsible Independent Fiduciaries for

the Multiple Client Account, determined according to the latest

valuation of the Account's assets performed no more than 12 months

prior to such appraisal, the fair market value of the assets for any

``deemed sale'', relating to the payment of a Performance Fee (as

described in paragraphs (i) and (j) below) shall be determined as

follows: (A) the Client Plans shall appoint a second appraiser and, if

the value established for the property does not deviate by more than

10% (or such lesser amount as may be agreed upon between RREEF and the

Client Plan(s)), then the two appraisals shall be averaged; (B) if the

values differ by more than 10%, then the two appraisers shall select a

third appraiser, that is independent of RREEF and its affiliates, who

will attempt to mediate the difference; (C) if the third appraiser can

cause the first two to reach an agreement on a value, that figure shall

be used; however, (D) if no agreement can be reached, the third

appraiser shall determine the value based on procedures set out in the

governing agreements of the Account or, if no such procedures are

established, shall conduct its own appraisal and the two closest of the

three shall be averaged;

(4) In the case of any Multiple Client Account, a list of all other

investors in the Account;

(5) Annual operating and capital budgets with respect to the

Account, to be distributed to a Client Plan within 60 days prior to the

beginning of the fiscal year to which such budgets relate; and

(6) An explanation of any material deviation from the budgets

previously provided to such Client Plan for the prior year.

(f) The total fees paid to RREEF shall constitute no more than

``reasonable compensation'' within the meaning of section 408(b)(2) of

the Act.

(g) The Investment Fee shall be equal to a specified percentage of

the net value of the Client Plan assets allocated to the Account which

shall be payable either:

(1) At the time assets are deposited (or deemed deposited in the

case of reinvestment of assets) in the Account; or

(2) In periodic installments, the amount (as a percentage of the

aggregate Investment Fee) and timing of which have been specified in

advance based on the percentage of the Client Plan's assets invested in

real property as of the payment date; provided that (i) The installment

period is no less than three months, and (ii) if the percentage of the

Client Plan assets which have actually been invested by a payment date

is less than the percentage required for the aggregate Investment Fee

to be paid in full through that date (both determined on a cumulative

basis), the Investment Fee paid on such a date shall be reduced by the

amount necessary to cause the percentage of the aggregate Investment

Fee paid to equal only the percentage of the Client Plan assets

actually invested by that date. The unpaid portion of such Investment

Fee shall be deferred to and payable on a cumulative basis on the next

scheduled payment date (subject to the percentage limitation described

in the preceding sentence).

(h) The Asset Management Fee shall be payable for each quarter from

the net operating income (NOI) of the Account. The amount of the Asset

Management Fee, expressed as a percentage of the NOI of the Account,

shall be established by the Agreement and agreed to by the Independent

Fiduciaries of the Client Plans:

(1) The Asset Management Fee for any Account will be calculated as

follows. The Asset Management Fee for a specific Account real property

will be based solely on items of operating income and expense that are

identified as line items on an operating budget for such property

disclosed to each Client Plan that participates in the Account. The

disclosures have to be made at least 30 days in advance of the fiscal

year to which the budget relates, and approved in the manner described

in (2) below;

(2) Each Client Plan must provide affirmative approval of the

operating budget. Specifically, when the proposed budget (or any

material deviation therefrom) is sent to a Client Plan, it will be

accompanied by a written notice that the Client Plan may object to the

budget or any specific line item therein, for purposes of calculating

the Asset Management Fees for the next fiscal year. The written notice

will contain a statement that affirmative approval of the budget is

required prior to the end of the 30-day period following such

disclosure. In the case of a Multiple Client Account, affirmative

approval by a majority of investors (by interest) will constitute

approval of the proposed budget (or deviation); and

(3) In the event of any subsequent decrease in previously approved

budgeted operating expenses for the fiscal year in excess of the limits

previously described (15% for any line item, 5% overall), then the

resulting increase in NOI (i.e., over and above the allowable

deviation) will not be taken into account in calculating RREEF's

management fee unless affirmative approval for the payment of such fee

is obtained in writing from the Independent Fiduciary for the Client

Plan in the Single Client Account or the Responsible Independent

Fiduciaries for the Multiple Client Account.

(i) In the case of any Multiple Client Account, the Performance Fee

shall be payable after the Client Plan has received distributions from

the Account in excess of an amount equal to 100% of its invested

capital plus a pre-specified annual compounded cumulative rate of

return (the Threshold Amount or Hurdle Rate). However, in the case of

RREEF's removal or resignation, RREEF shall be entitled to receive a

Performance Fee payable either at the time of removal or, in the event

of RREEF's resignation, upon sale of the assets to which the

Performance Fee is allocable or upon termination of the Account as the

case may be, subject to the requirements of paragraph (l) below, as

determined by a deemed distribution of the assets of the Account based

on an assumed sale of such assets at their fair market value (in

accordance with independent appraisals), only to the extent that the

Client Plan would receive distributions from the Account in excess of

an amount equal to the Threshold Amount at the time of RREEF's removal

or resignation. Both the Threshold Amount and the amount of the

Performance Fee, expressed as a percentage of the net proceeds from a

capital event distributed (or deemed distributed) from the Account in

excess of the Threshold Amount, shall be established by the Agreement

and agreed to by the Independent Fiduciaries of the Client Plans.

[[Page 29898]]

(j) In the case of any Single Client Account, the Performance Fee

shall be determined and paid either: (1) In the same manner as in the

case of a Multiple Client Account, as described in paragraph (i) above;

or (2) at the end of any pre-specified period of not less than one

year, provided that such Fee is based upon the sum of all actual

distributions from the Account during such period, plus deemed

distributions of the assets of the Account based on an assumed sale of

all such assets at their fair market value as of the end of such period

(in accordance with independent appraisals performed within 12 months

of the calculation) which are calculated to be in excess of the

Threshold Amount or the Hurdle Rate through the end of such period. For

this purpose, the Performance Fee measuring period shall be established

by the Agreement and agreed to by the Independent Fiduciary of the

Client Plan, provided that such period is not less than one year. In

addition, RREEF shall provide notice to the Client Plan within 60 days

of each Performance Fee calculation for a Single Client Account that

the Independent Fiduciary of the Client Plan has the right to request

updated appraisals of the properties held by the Account if such

Fiduciary determines that the existing independent appraisals

(performed within 12 months of the calculation) are no longer

sufficient.

(k) The Threshold Amount for any Performance Fee shall include at

least a minimum rate of return to the Client Plan, as defined below in

Part IV, paragraph (f).

(l) In the event RREEF resigns as investment manager for an

Account, the Performance Fee shall be calculated at the time of

resignation as described above in paragraph (i) above and allocated

among each property, based on the appraised value of such property in

relationship to the total appraised value of the Account. Each amount

arrived at through this calculation shall be multiplied by a fraction,

the numerator of which will be the actual sales price received by the

Account on subsequent disposition of the property (or in the case of a

property which has not been sold prior to the termination of a Multiple

Client Account, the appraised value of the property as of the

termination date), and the denominator of which will be the appraised

value of the property which was used in connection with determining the

Performance Fee at the time of resignation, provided that this fraction

shall never exceed 1.0. The resulting amount for each property shall be

the Performance Fee payable to RREEF upon the sale of such property or

termination of the Multiple Client Account, as the case may be.

(m) In cases where RREEF does have discretion to reinvest proceeds

from capital events, the reinvested amount shall not be treated as a

new contribution of capital by the Client Plan for purposes of the

Investment Fee, as described above in paragraph (g), or having been

distributed for purposes of the payment of Performance Fee as described

above in paragraphs (i) and (j);

(n) RREEF or its affiliates shall maintain, for a period of six

years, the records necessary to enable the persons described in

paragraph (o) of this Part III to determine whether the conditions of

this exemption have been met, except that:

(1) A prohibited transaction will not be considered to have

occurred if, due to circumstances beyond the control of RREEF or its

affiliates, the records are lost or destroyed prior to the end of the

six year period; and (2) no party in interest, other than RREEF, shall

be subject to the civil penalty that may be assessed under section

502(i) of the Act or the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of

the Code if the records are not maintained or are not available for

examination as required by paragraph (o) below.

(o)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (o)(2) and notwithstanding

any provisions of section 504(a)(2) and (b) of the Act, the records

referred to in paragraph (n) of this Part III shall be unconditionally

available at their customary location for examination during normal

business hours by:

(i) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the

Department or the Internal Revenue Service;

(ii) Any fiduciary of a Client Plan or any duly authorized employee

or representative of such fiduciary;

(iii) Any contributing employer to a Client Plan or any duly

authorized employee or representative of such employer; and

(iv) Any participant or beneficiary of a Client Plan or any duly

authorized employee or representative of such participant or

beneficiary;

(2) None of the persons described above in paragraph (o)(1)(ii)-

(iv) shall be authorized to examine the trade secrets of RREEF and its

affiliates or any commercial or financial information which is

privileged or confidential.

(p) RREEF shall provide a copy of the proposed exemption and a copy

of the final exemption to all Client Plans that invest in any Single

Client Account or any Multiple Client Account formed on, or after, the

date the final exemption is published in the Federal Register.

Part IV--Definitions

(a) An ``affiliate'' of a person includes:

(1) Any person directly or indirectly, through one or more

intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common control

with the person;

(2) Any officer, director, employee, relative of, or partner of any

such person; and

(3) Any corporation or partnership of which such person is an

officer, director, partner or employee.

(b) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling

influence over the management or policies of a person other than an

individual.

(c) The term ``management services'' means:

(1) Development of an investment strategy for the Account and

identification of suitable real estate-related investments;

(2) Directing the investments of the assets of the Account,

including the determination of the structure of each investment, the

negotiation of its terms and conditions and the performance of all

requisite due diligence;

(3) Determination of the timing of, and directing, the disposition

of assets of the Account and directing the liquidation of the Account

upon termination;

(4) Administration of the overall operation of the investments of

the Account, including all applicable leasing, management, financing

and capital improvement decisions;

(5) Establishing and maintaining accounting records of the Account

and distributing reports to Client Plans as described in Part III; and

(6) Selecting and directing all service providers of ancillary

services as defined in this Part IV; provided, however, that some or

all of the foregoing management services may be subject to the final

discretion of the Independent Fiduciary(ies) for the Client Plan(s).

(d) The term ``ancillary services'' means:

(1) Legal services;

(2) Services of architects, designers, engineers, construction

managers, hazardous materials consultants, contractors, leasing agents,

real estate brokers, and others in connection with the acquisition,

construction, improvement, management and disposition of investments in

real property;

(3) Insurance brokerage and consultation services;

(4) Services of independent auditors and accountants in connection

with auditing the books and records of the Accounts and preparing tax

returns;

[[Page 29899]]

(5) Appraisal and mortgage brokerage services; and

(6) Services for the development of income-producing real property.

(e) The term ``Independent Fiduciary'' with respect to any Client

Plan means a fiduciary (including an in-house fiduciary) independent of

RREEF and its affiliates. With respect to a Multiple Client Account,

the terms ``Independent Fiduciary'' or ``Responsible Independent

Fiduciaries'' mean the Independent Fiduciaries of the Client Plans

invested in the Account and other authorized persons acting for

investors in the Account which are not employee benefit plans as

defined under section 3(3) of ERISA (such as governmental plans,

university endowment funds, etc.) that are independent of RREEF and its

affiliates, and that collectively hold more than 50% of the interests

in the Account.

(f) The terms ``Threshold Amount'' or ``Hurdle Rate'' mean, with

respect to any Performance Fee, an amount which equals all of a Client

Plan's capital invested in an Account plus a pre-specified annual

compounded cumulative rate of return that is at least a minimum rate of

return determined as follows:

(1) A ``floating'' or non-fixed rate which is at least equal to the

lesser of seven percent, or the rate of change in the consumer price

index (CPI), during the period from the deposit of the Client Plan's

assets into the Account until the determination date; or

(2) A fixed rate which is at least equal to the lesser of seven

percent or the average rate of change in the CPI over some period of

time specified in the Agreement, which shall not exceed 10 years.

(g) The terms ``Net Operating Income'' or ``NOI'' means all

operating income of the Account (i.e., rents, interest, and other

income from day-to-day investment activities of the Account) less

operating expenses, determined on an accrual basis in accordance with

generally accepted accounting principles, but without regard to

depreciation (or other non-cash) expense and capital expenditures and

without regard to payments of interest and principal with respect to

any acquisition indebtedness relating to the property.

(h) The term ``Net Proceeds of a Capital Event'' means all proceeds

from capital events of an Account (i.e., sales or non-recourse

refinances of real property investments owned by the Account) less

repayment of debt with respect to such property, closing expenses paid,

and reasonable reserves established in connection therewith, whether

such reserves are for repayment of existing or anticipated obligations

or for contingent liabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This proposed exemption, if granted, will be effective

as of (i) May 16, 1994, with respect to the Shell Account, and (ii) the

date the final exemption is published in the Federal Register, with

respect to any Single Client Account and any Multiple Client Account

formed on, or after, such date.

Summary of Facts and Representations

1. RREEF America L.L.C. and its affiliate, RREEF Management

Company, provide investment and property management services to

institutional investors, including employee benefit plans and other

tax-exempt entities, through various separate accounts and commingled

accounts.

On January 27, 1998, RREEF America L.L.C. and its affiliate, RREEF

Corporation (collectively, RREEF), were acquired by RoProperty

Services, B.V. (RoProperty), a major Dutch investment advisory firm. As

a result, the RREEF entities were combined into a newly created

Delaware limited liability company which continues to use the name

``RREEF America L.L.C.'' RREEF operates as an autonomous entity which

continues to provide investment management services, and its affiliate,

RREEF Management Company, continues to provide property management

services.

2. RREEF is generally appointed as an investment manager (the

Manager) as defined in section 3(38) of the Act with respect to each

Client Plan that invests in a Single Client Account or a Multiple

Client Account. Although RREEF has discretion with respect to the day-

to-day operation of each Account and, in many cases, RREEF has full

discretion over Account acquisition and/or disposition decisions, in

certain cases final investment authority may remain with the Client

Plans.

3. A Client Plan may enter into one or more separate account

relationships with RREEF (each, a Single Client Account) pursuant to

one or more individually negotiated investment management agreements

with RREEF, or by investing in a commingled investment fund (Multiple

Client Account, collectively; the Accounts) managed by

RREEF.2 The Accounts to date have been blind investment

relationships established for the purpose of identifying and acquiring

real property investments that meet certain investment criteria.

However, specified-property investment relationships may be established

to invest in pre-identified real property investments. The

responsibilities of RREEF in a typical blind discretionary Account

would include:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ The applicant represents that in some instances a Client

Plan's investment in a Multiple Client Account that is a common or

collective trust fund maintained by a bank would be exempt from the

restrictions of section 406(a) of the Act by reason of section

408(b)(8). The Department expresses no opinion herein whether all

the conditions of section 408(b)(8) will be satisfied in such

transactions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Development of an investment strategy for the Account and

identification of suitable real estate investments.

(b) Directing the investment of the assets of the Account,

including the determination of the structure of each investment, the

negotiation of its terms and conditions, and the performance of

requisite due diligence.

(c) Determining the timing of, and directing, the disposition of

assets of the Account and directing the liquidation of the Account upon

termination.

(d) Administering the overall operation of the investments of the

Account, including all applicable leasing, management, financing, and

capital improvement decisions.

(e) Establishing and maintaining accounting records of the Account,

and distributing reports to Client Plans.

(f) RREEF also has complete discretion in the selection and

direction of the ancillary services (Ancillary Services) defined in

Part IV, paragraph (d) above.3

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ RREEF or its affiliates may, from time-to-time, provide

certain Ancillary Services to the Accounts, such as in connection

with the development or redevelopment of real property, preparation

of tax returns, environmental consulting, or other services.

Occasionally, RREEF has provided construction management and

development services with respect to non-ERISA governmental plan

accounts. However, upon special request from a client, RREEF may

agree to provide ancillary services, such as construction management

or development services based upon its knowledge of the Client

Plan's investments and its particular expertise. It represented that

the Ancillary Services are provided in accordance with section

408(b)(2) and the regulations thereunder (see 29 CFR 2550.408b-2).

However, the Department expresses no opinion as to whether the

selection of RREEF to provide Ancillary Services or the payment of

fees for such Ancillary Services, as described herein, would meet

the conditions of section 408(b)(2) of the Act.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

RREEF's primary investment objective is to acquire income-producing

real property which will generate current return through cash

distributions and will offer a potential for profit through gain on

resale.

Currently, Multiple Client Accounts consist primarily of tax-exempt

group trusts organized pursuant to IRS Revenue Ruling 81-100 and

limited partnerships. However, other Multiple Client Accounts may be

organized in the

[[Page 29900]]

future, including, but not limited to, title-holding corporations, real

estate investment trusts, or limited liability corporations. In the

case of Multiple Client Accounts that are group trusts, individual

principals and officers of RREEF generally serve as trustees thereof.

Similarly, RREEF principals and officers may serve as directors and/or

officers of other vehicles. RREEF currently does not serve as general

partner with respect to any of its limited partnership accounts that

are subject to ERISA. Typically, the general partner is a corporation

owned by one or more of the limited partners. However, in each case,

the primary investment discretion is delegated to RREEF pursuant to an

investment management agreement between RREEF and the Account (the

Agreement).

4. RREEF proposes to have the Client Plans pay for investment

management services it renders to the Accounts based upon a multi-fee

structure which will be approved in advance by the Independent

Fiduciaries of the Client Plans.4 Each Client Plan in a

Single Client Account shall have total net assets with a value in

excess of $100 million, and each Client Plan that is an investor in a

Multiple Client Account shall have total net assets with a value in

excess of $50 million. In addition, seventy-five percent (75%) or more

of the units of beneficial interests in a Multiple Client Account must

be held by Client Plans or other investors having total assets of at

least $100 million, and 50 percent (50%) or more of the Client Plans

investing in a Multiple Client Account must have assets of at least

$100 million. A group of Client Plans maintained by a single employer

or controlled group of employers, any of which individually has assets

of less than $100 million, will be counted as a single Client Plan if

the decision to invest in the Account (or the decision to make

investments in the Account available as an option for an individually

directed account) is made by a fiduciary other than RREEF, who

exercises such discretion with respect to Client Plan assets in excess

of $100 million. No Client Plan shall invest, in the aggregate, more

than 5% of its total assets in any Account or more than 10% of its

total assets in all Accounts established by RREEF.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ Section 404 of the Act requires, among other things, that a

plan fiduciary act prudently and solely in the interest of the

plan's participants and beneficiaries. Thus, the Department expects

a plan fiduciary, prior to entering into any performance based

compensation arrangement with an investment manager, to fully

understand the risks and benefits associated with a compensation

formula following disclosure by the investment manager of all

relevant information pertaining to the proposed arrangement. In

addition, a plan fiduciary must be capable of periodically

monitoring the actions taken by the investment manager in the

performance of its duties. The plan fiduciary must consider prior to

entering into any such arrangement, whether it is able to provide

adequate oversight of the investment manager during the course of

the arrangement.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The relief provided by this proposed exemption for the multi-fee

structures described herein will apply prospectively to any newly

formed Multiple Client Account, if such arrangement is approved in

advance by the appropriate Independent Fiduciaries of the Client Plans

and other investors that invest in the Account. In addition, the relief

provided by this proposed exemption will apply retroactively to the

Shell Pension Trust for its existing Single Client Account (i.e., the

Shell Account), as of May 16, 1994, and prospectively for other Single

Client Accounts if the conditions of the exemption are met. Therefore,

with regard to any Account, the Independent Fiduciary(ies) of the

Client Plan(s) will have final approval as to whether the Agreement

between the Client Plan(s) and RREEF will provide for any Investment

Fees, Asset Management Fees, or Performance Fees. Similarly, in the

case of any Account, the final decision to invest the assets of any

Client Plan in such Account will be made by an Independent Fiduciary.

RREEF will not exercise its discretion with respect to any Single

Client Account to invest those assets in any Multiple Client Account.

With respect to the Shell Account, RREEF represents that this Single

Client Account has complied with all the applicable conditions

contained herein for, among other things, approval by an Independent

Fiduciary for investment in such an Account, the payment of any Fees to

RREEF, the retention of any appraiser (as discussed further below) for

the valuation of properties held in the Account,5 and the

minimum plan asset size required for participation in such

Accounts.6

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ RREEF's Quarterly Report for the Shell Account, dated

December 31, 1998, describes a portfolio consisting of the following

six properties: (1) the Bellaire Place Apartments, a residential

property located in Redmond, Washington, with a fair market value of

approximately $18.6 million; (2) the San Diego Business Center, an

industrial property located in San Diego, California, with a fair

market value of approximately $17.7 million; (3) the West Sacramento

Industrial Center, an industrial property located in Sacramento,

California, which was sold on December 23, 1998 for $6.4 million;

(4) the Broadway Business Park, an industrial property located in

Phoenix, Arizona, with a fair market value of $26.5 million; (5)

1627 K Street, N.W., an office building located in Washington, D.C.,

with a fair market value of approximately $9.4 million; and (6)

Wendemere at the Ranch Apartments, a residential property located in

Westminster, Colorado, with a fair market value of approximately $16

million. The fair market value of the properties still held in the

Shell Account, as of December 31, 1998, was approximately

$88,268,000.

\6\ The Shell Pension Trust contained approximately $5.7 billion

in total assets, of which approximately 2% were invested in real

estate, as of January, 1999. These real estate assets are managed by

three primary investment managers, one of which is RREEF.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. The multi-fee structure will include: (i) The Investment Fee, a

one-time initial fee paid either at the time the Client Plan invests

in, or allocates additional assets to, the Account, or in periodic

installments while such assets are invested by the Account, as

described below; (ii) the Asset Management Fee, an annual fee for asset

management charged as a percentage of the net operating income produced

by properties held in the Account (defined below), which will be

payable to RREEF without regard to the return to the Client Plans of

their invested capital; and (iii) the Performance Fee, a fee charged

upon actual or deemed distributions of capital proceeds from the

Account in excess of a Client Plan's invested capital, plus a

negotiated cumulative, compounded annual hurdle rate of return on such

invested capital (i.e., the Threshold Amount or Hurdle Rate). In a

Single Client Account, an Independent Fiduciary may agree to allow

RREEF to receive a periodic Performance Fee based on the Account's

performance prior to the Client Plan receiving actual distribution of

capital back from the Account in amounts which exceed the prescribed

Threshold Amounts. Such Fees will be based on deemed distributions of

the assets in such Accounts at periodic intervals, with all property

valuations determined by qualified real estate appraisers independent

of RREEF and its affiliates. Any property valuation used in the

calculation of the Performance Fee will be performed within 12 months

of that calculation.

6. RREEF requests an individual exemption for Client Plans that

invest in an Account to pay an Investment Fee, Asset Management Fee,

and a Performance Fee to RREEF under circumstances described below.

RREEF represents that Fee rates and Threshold Amounts will be

negotiated on an Account-by-Account basis.

The Investment Fee will be a one-time fee intended to cover the

expense of organizing the Account, identifying suitable investments,

and completing the initial purchases of real properties for the

Account, based on the assets invested by the Client Plan in the

Account. The Investment Fee may be paid either (i) At the time the

Client

[[Page 29901]]

Plan invests assets in the Account, or (ii) in installments at the end

of pre-specified periods of not less than three months (over a

specified period of years). However, if the pre-specified percentage of

the Account's assets has not been invested by the payment date for the

Investment Fee, the amount of such fee payable on that date will be

reduced to reflect the percentage of assets which have been invested by

that date. In such instances, the remainder of the Investment Fee will

be deferred until the next pre-specified installment date. At that

time, the Investment Fee for the current and past installment dates

will be paid (subject to further deferral if the relevant assets in the

Account have not been invested at that time). The Investment Fees will

generally range from 0% to 2% of the capital committed for investment

by the Client Plans. However, the exact percentage for any Investment

Fee will be negotiated between RREEF and the relevant Client Plans in

the Account.

7. The Asset Management Fee will be paid quarterly throughout the

term of the Account. As with the Investment Fee, the exact terms of the

Asset Management Fee will be negotiated between RREEF and the Client

Plan(s) prior to the initial investment of any Client Plan(s)' assets

in the Account. The Asset Management Fee will be calculated with

respect to the net operating income (NOI) from properties owned by the

Account. In this regard, NOI will not include gains made on properties

from capital events. The Asset Management Fee will be paid without

regard to the return of the Client Plan's invested capital.

The Asset Management Fee will compensate the Investment Manager for

the following services: (i) Selection of properties and other assets

for acquisition or disposition in an Account, (ii) day-to-day

investment and administrative operations of an Account, (iii)

performance of property management and leasing services for the

properties held by the Account, (iv) obtaining and maintaining

insurance for the properties and other assets in the Account, (v)

establishing tax-exempt title-holding corporations under section 501(a)

of the Code for the properties, (vi) obtaining independent MAI

appraisals of the properties every three years, and performing annual

internal valuations of the properties, as necessary; and (vii)

preparing quarterly and annual written reports concerning assets,

receipts, and disbursements of the Account.

As stated above, the Asset Management Fee will be charged as a

percentage of the NOI on the properties held by the Account for each

quarter. The Asset Management Fees are determined by negotiation for

each Account, but generally will be between 5% to 8% of the NOI per

quarterly payment period for properties in the Account. NOI for an

Account will be determined on the basis of recurring operating (non-

capital) income (i.e., rents, interest, and other income from the day-

to-day investments of the Account) less recurring operating expenses

(i.e., utilities, taxes, insurance and maintenance) determined on an

accrual basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. RREEF states that these recurring revenue items and

operating expenses will be set forth in annual budgets that are

reviewed and approved in advance by the Client Plans and other

investors.

The NOI for an Account will be determined without regard to capital

expenditures and non-cash expenditures for the Account, such as

depreciation on properties held by the Account or amortization of

capital expenditures. In addition, NOI will not be reduced by debt

service. Therefore, capital items, such as debt service and non-cash

expense items, will have no effect on RREEF's Asset Management Fees.

Instead, as discussed more fully below, these items will be reflected

in the Performance Fee because any capital expenditure will increase

the Threshold Amount for purposes of any subsequent Performance Fee

calculation, and any capital distribution will reduce the Threshold

Amount.7

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ As noted above, the determinations of which items are

``operating'' and which are ``capital'' will be determined by

generally accepted accounting principles. Such determinations are

subject to annual review and confirmation by independent Certified

Public Accountants retained to audit RREEF's annual financial

statements.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

With respect to each Account, RREEF will prepare annual operating

and capital budgets for each of the Account's properties, which will be

distributed to each Client Plan invested in the Account, within 60 days

prior to the beginning of the fiscal year to which such budgets apply.

At the end of each year, RREEF will also distribute to each Client Plan

an explanation of any material deviation from the budgets previously

provided to the Client Plan for such year.

8. RREEF agrees that in calculating its Asset Management Fee for

any Account, the Fee for any individual real property in the Account

will be determined solely on the basis of those items of operating

income and expense that are identified as line items in the operating

budget for such property, which shall be disclosed to each Client Plan

that participates in the Account. Such disclosures have to be made at

least 30 days in advance of the fiscal year to which the budget

relates, and approved by the Client Plans in the manner described

below.

If, during such year for any previously disclosed line item of

operating expense in the budget for a property, there is any material

deviation between such line item and the actual amount of such expense

for the current year, such deviation will not be taken into account in

calculating the Asset Management Fee unless it is first disclosed to,

and approved by, the Client Plan(s) in the same manner as the original

budgeted line item. For this purpose, a determination of what is

considered a ``material'' deviation will be established by the

investment or property management agreement between RREEF and the

Client Plan(s) for any real property held by the Account. Property

management agreements used by RREEF permit no more than a 15% variance

between any individual line item expense in the operating budget from

year to year. In addition, overall budgeted expenses may vary no more

than 5% from year to year.

If the requisite percentage of investors in an Account fails to

approve the proposed budget or any line item therein, then RREEF will

continue to utilize the prior year's budget figures (generally with a

permitted deviation of 5%). In the event of any subsequent material

deviation from a line item expense in a previously approved budget, or

the addition of a new line item, RREEF would use the expense figures as

budgeted for purposes of its fee calculation, and the variance would

have no effect on its current Asset Management Fee calculation, unless

a revised budget reflecting the deviation (or new line item) is

approved. Any such variance would be reflected only in the subsequent

Performance Fee calculation (by increasing or decreasing the Threshold

Amount).8

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\ For example, if RREEF were to budget landscaping expenses at

$100 for an Account, but the actual figure turns out to be $80,

unless RREEF obtains the approval of its Client Plans, the amount it

uses for calculating its Asset Management Fee would be limited to

$85 (applying the 15% deviation, as described above). Although the

additional $5 cost savings directly benefits the Client Plans, it

would not be reflected in the Asset Management Fee. Rather, to the

extent that this cost savings increases the amount available for

distribution to the Client Plans, it would be reflected in the

Threshold Amount for purposes of calculating RREEF's future

Performance Fee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Client Plan approval for these purposes will be by an

affirmative approval in advance by the Independent Fiduciary of a

Single Client Account or

[[Page 29902]]

the Responsible Independent Fiduciaries for a Multiple Client Account

representing at least a majority of the interests in such

Account.9 Specifically, when the proposed budget (or any

material deviation therefrom) is sent to a Client Plan, it will be

accompanied by a written notice that the Client Plan must approve the

budget, and any specific line item therein, for purposes of calculating

the Asset Management Fees for the next fiscal year. The written notice

will contain a statement that affirmative approval of the current

budget is required prior to the end of the 30-day period following such

disclosure. In the case of a Multiple Client Account, affirmative

approval by a majority of investors (by interest) will constitute

approval of the proposed budget (or deviation). In the event of any

subsequent decrease in previously approved budgeted operating expenses

for the fiscal year in excess of the limits previously described (15%

for any line item, 5% overall), then the resulting increase in NOI

(i.e., over and above the allowable deviation) will not be taken into

account in calculating RREEF's management fee unless affirmative

approval for the payment of such fee is obtained in writing from

Independent Fiduciary for the Client Plan in the Single Client Account

or the Responsible Independent Fiduciaries for the Client Plans and

other investors in the Multiple Client Account.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ In this regard, the Department notes that an Independent

Fiduciary for a Single Client Account should closely scrutinize

budget estimates for both the NOI of the Account and the Asset

Management Fees payable to RREEF each year based on the actual NOI.

With respect to a Multiple Client Account, the Responsible

Independent Fiduciaries should collectively scrutinize such budgets

and NOI-based Fees, and raise appropriate objections to those Fees

which result from actual operating expenses that materially deviate

from previously approved budgets for such expenses. Thus, the

Department emphasizes that an Independent Fiduciary for a Client

Plan investing in either a Single or Multiple Client Account must

adequately monitor the payment of any Asset Management Fees to RREEF

by closely reviewing how the NOI that results from each property

held by the Account may be affected by any actions taken by RREEF

for such property.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

With respect to the Shell Account, RREEF represents that annual

budgets have been presented to an Independent Fiduciary for the Shell

Pension Trust for review and approval each year since May 16, 1994. In

this regard, RREEF states that although the annual budget approvals for

properties held in the Shell Account may not have been in writing in

all cases, both parties (i.e., RREEF and the Independent Fiduciary for

the Shell Account) have made contemporaneous written confirmations of

their discussions regarding the annual budgets.

9. The applicant states that in lieu of the Investment Fee and/or

the Asset Management Fee, RREEF and the Client Plans may agree to an

alternative fee arrangement for an Account (the Alternative Fee) which

is based either upon a fixed amount or amounts, or an objective formula

to be negotiated (in either case) between RREEF and the Client Plan

prior to the initial investment of any Client Plan assets in an

Account. RREEF represents that any Alternative Fee will be covered by

section 408(b)(2) and the regulations thereunder (29 CFR 2550.408b-2).

Accordingly, no exemption is being requested by RREEF for any

Alternative Fees.

10. In a Single Client Account, the Performance Fee will be

determined and paid either (i) In the same manner as in the case of a

Multiple Client Account, or (ii) at the end of any pre-specified period

of not less than one-year, provided that the Fee is based upon the sum

of all actual distributions from the Account during such period, plus

deemed distributions of the assets of the Account based on an assumed

sale of all such assets at their fair market value as of the end of

such period (in accordance with independent appraisals performed within

12 months of the calculation) which are calculated to be in excess of

the Threshold Amount through the end of such period.

In the case of a Multiple Client Account, the Performance Fee will

be charged against all distributions of net proceeds from capital

events, as defined in Part IV(h), only after the Client Plans and other

investors have received distributions (from all sources) from the

Account in excess of the Threshold Amount agreed to by the Responsible

Independent Fiduciaries.

Most of RREEF's Single Client Accounts are long-term open-ended

relationships under which the Client Plans may continue to invest new

funds on an ongoing basis. For this reason, RREEF states that certain

Client Plans that invest in Single Client Accounts will negotiate for

the payment of a Performance Fee that would be calculated and payable

periodically, not less frequently than once a year (generally, every

three years, commencing on the third anniversary of the first

acquisitions of properties made by the Account). As noted above, this

periodic Performance Fee would be based on all actual sales of

properties by the Account and distributions made back to the investors

during such period, as well as deemed or constructive sales of all

properties held in the Account at their most recent appraised values,

and the deemed distributions of the net proceeds from such constructive

sales plus earnings which are considered to be at or above the

Threshold Amount.10 In such instances, the periodic

Performance Fee will take into account both realized and unrealized net

gains on properties held in a Single Client Account, and would be

payable to RREEF for deemed distributions of unrealized net gains on

properties held by the Account for a pre-specified period. Therefore,

if agreed to by the Independent Fiduciary for the Client Plan, RREEF

would earn a Performance Fee based on the Single Client Account's

performance which occurs prior to a return to the Client Plan of its

invested capital plus earnings at or above the designated Threshold

Amount or Hurdle Rate.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\10\ In this regard, RREEF represents that while it anticipates

that most Client Plans establishing a Single Client Account will

elect to pay a periodic Performance Fee based on deemed

distributions, RREEF will not preclude any such Client Plan from

paying a Performance Fee only after the Client Plan has received

actual distributions from an Account equal to its initial invested

capital plus earnings at the Threshold Amount. However, a periodic

Performance Fee arrangement will not be available for Multiple

Client Accounts.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

11. For purposes of the Fees, the fair market value of the

Accounts' real property assets (other than in the case of actual sales)

will be based on appraisals prepared by independent MAI appraisers. In

this regard, every agreement by which an appraiser is retained will

include the appraiser's representation that: (1) Its ultimate client is

the Account and its underlying Plan (and non-Plan) investors, and (2)

it will perform its duties in the interest of such Account (and

investors). The applicant states that in the case of any appraisal that

will serve as the basis for any ``deemed sale'' of such property for

purposes of calculating the periodic Performance Fee payable to RREEF,

then the following procedure shall be utilized:

(a) In the case of any Single Client Account, such MAI appraiser

shall be either (i) Selected by the Independent Fiduciary of the Client

Plan subject to the approval of RREEF, or (ii) selected by RREEF

subject to the affirmative approval by the Independent Fiduciary of the

Client Plan;

(b) In the case of any Multiple Client Account, such MAI appraiser

shall be approved in advance by the Responsible Independent Fiduciaries

(as defined in Part IV(e) above) owning a majority of the interests in

the Account according to the latest valuation of the Account's assets

performed no more than 12 months prior to such appraisal, which

[[Page 29903]]

approval may be by written notice and deemed consent by such

Fiduciaries' failure to object to the appraiser within 30 days of such

notice; and

(c) In either case, the selected MAI appraiser shall acknowledge in

writing that the Client Plan(s) and other investors (in the case of a

Multiple Client Account), rather than RREEF, is (are) its clients, and

that in performing its services for the Account it shall act in the

sole interest of such Client Plan(s) and other investors. In addition,

following the date this proposed exemption is granted, every appraiser

selected shall acknowledge that it owes a professional obligation to

the Client Plans and other investors in the Account in performing its

services as an appraiser for properties in the Account.

If an MAI appraiser selected by RREEF, or an appraisal performed by

a previously approved appraiser, is rejected by the Independent

Fiduciary for a Single Client Account or the Responsible Independent

Fiduciaries for the Client Plans owning the majority of the interests

in the Multiple Client Account according to the latest valuation of the

Account's assets performed no more than 12 months prior to such

appraisal, the fair market value of the assets for any ``deemed sale''

relating to the payment of a Performance Fee will be determined as

follows: (i) The Client Plans shall appoint a second appraiser and, if

the value established for the property does not deviate by more than

10% (or such lesser amount as may be agreed upon between RREEF and the

Client Plan(s)), then the two appraisals shall be averaged; (ii) if the

values differ by more than 10%, then the two appraisers shall select a

third appraiser, that is independent of RREEF and its affiliates, who

will attempt to mediate the difference; (iii) if the third appraiser

can cause the first two to reach an agreement on a value, that figure

shall be used; however, (iv) if no agreement can be reached, the third

appraiser shall determine the value based on procedures set out in the

governing agreements of the Account or, if no such procedures are

established, shall conduct its own appraisal and the two closest of the

three shall be averaged.

In all cases, the Client Plan will retain the right to challenge

any appraiser or appraisal. In the case of a Single Client Account, the

frequency and timing of the required appraisals will be determined by

the Independent Fiduciary of the Client Plan at the time it enters into

an Account relationship with RREEF. However, all Performance Fee

calculations will be based on contemporaneous appraisals of properties

held by the Account, which will be performed within 12 months of the

calculation. Thus, for example, RREEF maintains that a three year

appraisal cycle will correspond to a three year periodic Performance

Fee measuring period for an Account. In addition, RREEF will provide

notice to the Client Plan within 60 days of each Performance Fee

calculation for a Single Client Account that the Independent Fiduciary

of the Client Plan has the right to request updated appraisals of the

properties held by the Account if such Fiduciary determines that the

existing independent appraisals (performed within 12 months of the

calculation) are no longer sufficient.

12. With respect to the calculation of any Threshold Amount for the

payment of a Performance Fee, RREEF states that a bookkeeping account

will be maintained for each Client Plan which will show at all times

the amount that has to be distributed to satisfy the Threshold Amount.

When a certain amount is invested in the Account on a particular date,

this bookkeeping account will initially equal the invested amount and

will thereafter be increased to reflect the hurdle/threshold rate of

return for the Account compounded on an annual basis. Whenever a

distribution (from any source) is made from the Account to the Client

Plan, the amount of this bookkeeping account will be reduced by the

full amount of the distribution. Thereafter, the Threshold Amount will

be calculated with respect to and added to this reduced amount. Only

when the bookkeeping account is reduced to zero will the Threshold

Amount be satisfied. With all Multiple Client Accounts, and those

Single Client Accounts that elect to have a Performance Fee paid only

after actual distributions are paid from the Account, once the

Threshold Amount has been satisfied, the Performance Fee will be

payable to RREEF with respect to all further distributions of net

proceeds from capital events from the Account. With respect to any

Single Client Accounts which elect to pay periodic Performance Fees

based upon deemed distributions of the proceeds from an assumed sale of

the properties by the Account, any such deemed distribution would

reduce the Threshold Amount only for purposes of such Fee payment.

Thus, immediately after such calculation, the Threshold Amount would be

increased by the full amount of the deemed distribution for purposes of

determining any later Performance Fee based on either deemed or actual

distributions to the Client Plans.

13. The applicant submitted hypothetical examples of how the

Performance Fee would work in a Multiple Client Account and a Single

Client Account context.

In the first example, RREEF establishes a Multiple Client Account

to which the Client Plans contribute $100 million (Initial

Contribution) and agree to pay RREEF a Performance Fee equal to 15% of

all amounts distributable from the Account after the investors have

received distributions equal to their initial invested capital plus a

real (CPI-adjusted) annual Threshold Amount of return of 4%. Assuming

that CPI remains constant at 4% annually, the nominal annual Threshold

Amount is 8% (the Threshold Amount). The Multiple Client Account

acquires two real properties at a cost of $90 million (Property I) and

$10 million (Property II, collectively; the Properties). Annual cash

flow from operations is 7% of the Initial Contribution of $100 million,

or 7% million (Annual Cash Flow).

For a Multiple Client Account, the Threshold Amount is calculated

as follows: 11

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ This example has been simplified. In reality, distributions

would be made periodically throughout the year, reducing the amount

on which the hurdle is calculated.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Threshold

amount (in

Calculation millions of

$)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 1................................... 100.00+(.08 x 100.00)-7 = $101.00

Year 2................................... 101.00+(.08 x 101.00)-7 = 102.08

Year 3................................... 102.08+(.08 x 102.08)-7 = 103.25

Year 4................................... 103.25+(.08 x 103.25)-7 = 104.51

Year 5................................... 104.51+(.08 x 104.51)-7 = 105.87

[[Page 29904]]

Year 6................................... 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the end of year 5, Property I is sold for $110 million, and

there is an actual distribution of $110 million. Accordingly, RREEF

will receive a Performance Fee of 15% times $110 million less $106

million (i.e., the approximate Threshold Amount at year 5), or

$600,000. Numerically, this is as follows: ($110 million-$106 million)

x 15% = $600,000. Because the Threshold Amount has been reduced to $0

at year 6, an additional Performance Fee will be payable with respect

to any subsequent distribution of cash from a capital event, i.e., any

sale or refinancing of the remaining property. Accordingly, if Property

II is sold in year 10 for $15 million, RREEF will receive an additional

Performance Fee of 15% times $15 million, or $2.25 million.

Numerically, as follows: $15 million x 15% = $2.25 million.

Therefore, the total Performance Fee received by RREEF in this example

is $2,850,000.

In the second example, a large Client Plan establishes a Single

Client Account with RREEF to which it contributes $100 million (Initial

Contribution), and agrees to pay RREEF a Performance Fee every five

years equal to 15% of all amounts distributed or deemed distributed

from the Account after the Client Plan has received actual or deemed

distributions equal to its invested capital plus a real (CPI-adjusted)

annual Threshold Amount of return of 4%. If CPI remains constant at 4%

annually, the nominal annual rate is 8% (the Threshold Amount). The

Account acquires two real property assets at a cost of $90 million

(Property I) and $10 million (Property II). Annual cash flow from

operations is 7% of the Initial Contribution of $100 million, or 7%

million (Annual Cash Flow).

For a Single Client Account, the Threshold Amount is calculated as

follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Threshold

amount (in

Calculation millions of

$)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 1................................... 100.00+(.08 x 100.00)-7 = $101.00

Year 2................................... 101.00+(.08 x 101.00)-7 = 102.08

Year 3................................... 102.08+(.08 x 102.08)-7 = 103.25

Year 4................................... 103.25+(.08 x 103.25)-7 = 104.51

Year 5................................... 104.51+(.08 x 104.51)-7 = 105.87

Year 6................................... 120.00 12 +(.08 x 120.00)-7 = 122.60

Year 7................................... 122.60+(.08 x 122.60)-7 = 125.41

Year 8................................... 125.41+(.08 x 125.41)-7 = 128.44

Year 9................................... 128.44+(.08 x 128.44)-7 = 131.72

Year 10.................................. 131.72+(.08 x 131.72)-7 = 135.25

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After five years, the Threshold Amount will increase to

approximately $106 million. At this time, if the two Properties are

appraised for $110 million and $10 million, respectively, the deemed

distributions are $120 million. Accordingly, at this time RREEF will

receive a Performance Fee of: 15% x ($120 million--$106 million) =

$2.1 million.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\12\ $120.00 is the amount of deemed distributions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

After the first periodic Performance Fee is paid out, the Threshold

Amount is calculated as follows: First, the Threshold Amount is

restored by the full amount of the deemed distribution, i.e., to $120

million, for purposes of the next five-year Performance Fee

calculation. At the end of 10 years, the Threshold Amount will be

approximately $135 million, and no additional Performance Fee will be

payable unless the combined appraised value of the two Properties

exceeds that amount.

14. All proceeds from capital events of an Account (i.e., sales or

refinancings of real property investments owned by the Account) will be

first applied to pay expenses of the Account. These expenses will

include repayment of debt, payment of closing expenses, and

establishment of reasonable reserves in connection with the Account's

assets, whether such reserves are for repayment of existing or

anticipated obligations or for contingent liabilities, other than the

Performance Fee. Such proceeds, net of these expenses and reserves,

generally will be the distributable net proceeds of capital events upon

which the Performance Fee may be payable.

15. With respect to its Single Client Accounts, RREEF generally

does not have discretion to reinvest proceeds from capital events, and

any such reinvestment will occur at the direction of the Client Plan's

Independent Fiduciary. The amount reinvested will be treated as having

been recontributed by the Client Plan for purposes of the Investment

Fee and the Performance Fee. Thus, RREEF represents that where capital

proceeds are reinvested they will be treated as new invested capital

for the purpose of the Threshold Amount and the payment of any future

Performance Fee. RREEF also states that where it does not have

reinvestment discretion, capital proceeds will be distributed to the

Client Plan, unless such Client Plan affirmatively consents to the

reinvestment. In cases where RREEF does have discretion to reinvest

proceeds from capital events, the reinvested amount would not be

treated as a new contribution of capital by the Client Plan for

purposes of the Investment Fee, or having been distributed for purposes

of the payment of Performance Fee. Therefore, such reinvested amounts

will not be considered distributions under the bookkeeping account

maintained for the Client Plan for purposes of calculating whether the

Threshold Amount has been reached.

16. RREEF may be removed as the investment Manager for an Account

at any time (generally upon 30 days notice), without cause, upon

delivery of a notice of removal to RREEF by the Client Plan in the case

of a Single Client

[[Page 29905]]

Account, or by the Client Plans owning at least a majority of the

interests in a Multiple Client Account. In addition, a Multiple Client

Account may terminate upon failure to appoint a replacement investment

manager following the removal or resignation of RREEF. The details and

mechanics of the removal or resignation process will vary from Account

to Account. In the case of an Account procedure for removal for cause

(e.g., breach of contract), removal generally will be immediate. In

most cases, however, removal will result from a desire to appoint a

replacement manager and RREEF may be asked or required to stay on for a

period of time (e.g., up to 120 days) until a replacement is in place.

Similarly, if RREEF resigns, it may be asked to stay on until a

replacement is appointed.

Upon removal of RREEF as investment Manager, RREEF will be entitled

to receive the Performance Fee as if: (a) The assets of an Account had

been sold at a price which is then-agreed to by RREEF and the Client

Plan (or, with respect to a Multiple Client Account, Client Plans and

other investors owning at least a majority of the interests in the

Multiple Client Account); and (b) the deemed proceeds from the deemed

sale were to be distributed from the Account. If RREEF and the Client

Plan(s) cannot agree on a price, then the price shall be determined by

an independent MAI appraiser mutually agreed to by RREEF and the Client

Plan(s). If RREEF and the Client Plan(s) cannot agree on an appraiser,

then the governing documents of the Account will provide for a means of

selecting one or more appraisers or for seeking binding arbitration, as

discussed more fully in paragraph 11 above.

In addition, RREEF may generally resign as investment Manager with

respect to any Account at any time, without cause, by providing written

notice to the Client Plan(s) with an interest in the Account. In this

event, the Performance Fee will be tentatively calculated in the same

manner as if RREEF were removed as investment manager, and allocated

among each real property investment of the Account in proportion to the

respective differences in their appraised values from their original

cost (i.e., deemed unrealized appreciation, if any, for each property).

The amount of the Performance Fee tentatively allocated to each

property will be multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which will

be the actual sales price of the property received by the Account upon

the disposition/sale of the property, and the denominator of which will

be the appraised value of the property which was used in connection

with determining the Performance Fee at the time of resignation,

provided that this fraction will never exceed 1.0 (that is, the

Performance Fee may be decreased to reflect any subsequent decline in

the value of a property, but not increased to reflect any subsequent

increase in value).13 No Performance Fee will be payable

until distributions (deemed or actual) from the Account exceed the

Threshold Amount.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\13\ If a Multiple Client Account is terminated prior to the

sale of all the Account's assets (i.e., each Client Plan is

distributed an undivided interest in each such asset), each

remaining asset in the Account at the time of termination will be

treated as having been sold at its then-appraised value.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Performance Fee will be calculated with respect to each

property held by an Account at the time of resignation. However, the

Performance Fee will not be paid for any property until the earlier of:

(i) The sale of the property from the Account, or (ii) with respect to

a Multiple Client Account, the termination of the Account. The

Performance Fee will be paid only after the Client Plans have received

their initial invested capital plus earnings at the Threshold Amounts.

The replacement investment manager of the Account (unrelated to RREEF)

will have discretion as to when the property is sold or when the

Account is terminated.

17. A Single Client Account generally may be terminated at any time

by the Client Plan upon not more than 30 days written notice to RREEF,

by RREEF's resignation, or by expiration of the period of years

specified in the investment management agreement governing the Account

(unless extended at the request of the Client Plan). In the case of a

Single Client Account termination, the assets of the Account may be

liquidated for cash or distributed in-kind to the Client Plan.

A Multiple Client Account generally may be terminated upon: (a) The

affirmative decision of the Client Plans and other investors owning at

least a majority of the interests in the Multiple Client Account, or

(b) expiration of the period of years specified in the Account's

organizational documents. In addition, a Multiple Client Account may

terminate upon failure to appoint a replacement investment manager

following the removal or resignation of RREEF. Upon termination of a

Multiple Client Account, RREEF is generally obligated to dispose of its

assets and distribute net sales proceeds in an orderly fashion.

In the case of the Multiple Client or Single Client Account

termination, RREEF's Performance Fee would be calculated in the same

manner as discussed above with respect to the removal of RREEF.

18. Each Client Plan will receive throughout the term of the

Account the following information:

(a) Quarterly and annual reports prepared by RREEF relating to the

overall financial position and operating results of the Account (annual

reports are audited by independent certified public accountants as

required by the terms of the Account's governing documents), a

statement regarding the total amount of fees paid by the Account to

RREEF for the period, and, in the case of a Multiple Client Account,

the value of the Client Plan's interest in the Account;

(b) An annual statement of the current fair market value of all

properties owned by the Account based most recent MAI appraisals of

such properties;

(c) In the case of a Multiple Client Account, a list of investors

in the Account and, when applicable, a notice of any change thereto;

and

(d) Operating and capital budgets for the subsequent year, plus

(where applicable) an explanation of any material deviation from the

prior year's budgets.

Any fiduciary for the Client Plan, as well as other authorized

persons described above in paragraph (o)(1) of Part III, will have

access during normal business hours to RREEF's records concerning the

Accounts in which such persons have an interest, subject to the

condition that each such person agree in writing that the information

contained in such records shall be kept confidential except to the

extent disclosure is authorized in writing by RREEF or is necessary to

preserve or protect the assets of an Account or the interests of the

Client Plans. The Department and the Internal Revenue Service will have

access to all RREEF records concerning the Accounts. The Client Plan(s)

having an interest in an Account will also, upon request, be provided

with a report of all compensation paid to RREEF by the Account.

19. In summary, the applicant represents that the transaction

satisfies the statutory criteria of section 408(a) of the Act and

section 4975(c)(2) of the Code because:

(a) The investment of plan assets in a Single or Multiple Client

Account, including the terms and payment of any Investment Fee, Asset

Management Fee and Performance Fee, shall be approved in writing by an

Independent Fiduciary of a Client Plan which is independent of RREEF

and its affiliates.

[[Page 29906]]

(b) At the time any Account is established (or amended) and at the

time of any subsequent investment of assets (including the reinvestment

of assets) in such Account:

(1) Each Client Plan in a Single Client Account shall have total

net assets with a value in excess of $100 million, and each Client Plan

that is an investor in a Multiple Client Account shall have total net

assets with a value in excess of $50 million, subject to certain

additional requirements as stated in paragraph (1) of Part III(c)

above; and

(2) No Client Plan shall invest, in the aggregate, more than 5% of

its total assets in any Account or more than 10% of its total assets in

all Accounts established by RREEF.

(d) Prior to making an investment in any Account (or amending an

existing Account), the Independent Fiduciary of each Client Plan

investing in an Account shall have received offering materials from

RREEF which disclose all material facts concerning the purpose,

structure, and operation of the Account, including any Fee arrangements

(provided that, in the case of an amendment to the Fee arrangements,

such materials need address only the amended fees and any other

material change to the Account's original offering materials).

(e) With respect to its ongoing participation in an Account, each

Client Plan shall receive the following written information from RREEF:

(1) Audited financial statements of the Account prepared by

independent public accountants selected by RREEF no later than 90 days

after the end of the fiscal year of the Account;

(2) Quarterly and annual reports prepared by RREEF relating to the

overall financial position and operating results of the Account and, in

the case of a Multiple Client Account, the value of each Client Plan's

interest in the Account. Each such report shall include a statement

regarding the amount of the Fees paid to RREEF during the period

covered by such report;

(3) Periodic appraisals (as agreed upon with the Client Plans)

indicating the fair market value of the Account's assets as established

by an MAI licensed real estate appraiser independent of RREEF and its

affiliates, under the procedures described herein;

(4) In the case of any Multiple Client Account, a list of all other

investors in the Account;

(5) Annual operating and capital budgets with respect to the

Account, to be distributed to a Client Plan within 60 days prior to the

beginning of the fiscal year to which such budgets relate; and

(6) An explanation of any material deviation from the budgets

previously provided to such Client Plan for the prior year;

(f) The total fees paid to RREEF shall constitute no more than

``reasonable compensation'' within the meaning of section 408(b)(2) of

the Act.

(g) RREEF shall provide a copy of the proposed exemption and a copy

of the final exemption to all Client Plans that invest in any Single

Client Account or any Multiple Client Account formed, on or after, the

date the final exemption is published in the Federal Register.

Notice to Interested Persons

Those persons who may be interested in the pendency of this

exemption include the independent fiduciaries of each Client Plan that

maintains a Single Client Account with RREEF. Thus, RREEF will provide

notice of the proposed exemption to each such affected Client Plan, by

first class mail, within thirty (30) days following the publication of

the proposed exemption in the Federal Register. The notice will include

a copy of the notice of proposed exemption as published in the Federal

Register and as a supplemental statement, as required, pursuant to 29

CFR 2570.43(b)(2). This supplemental statement will inform such

interested persons of their right to comment on the proposed exemption

and/or to request a hearing. All written comments and/or requests for a

hearing are due within sixty (60) days of the publication of this

notice of proposed exemption in the Federal Register.

In addition, RREEF shall provide a copy of the proposed exemption

and a copy of the final exemption to all Client Plans that invest in

any Single Client Account or any Multiple Client Account formed on, or

after, the date the final exemption is published in the Federal

Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ekaterina A. Uzlyan of the Department,

telephone (202) 219-8883. (This is not a toll-free number.)

Premier Funding Group, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan (the P/S

Plan) and the Money Purchase Pension Plan for Employees of Premier

Funding Group, Inc. (the M/P Plan, collectively; the Plans),

Located in Arlington, Texas

[Application Nos. D-10669 and D-10670]

Proposed Exemption

The Department is considering granting an exemption under the

authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the

Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 C.F.R. part

2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). If the exemption

is granted, the restrictions of sections 406(a), 406(b)(1) and (b)(2)

of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of section

4975 of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the

Code, shall not apply as of February 1, 1999, to a lease (the Lease) of

certain second-floor space (the Leased Premises) in a building by the

Plans to LM Holdings, Inc., a party in interest with respect to the

Plans; provided that the following conditions are satisfied:

(a) All terms and conditions of the Lease are at least as favorable

to the Plans as those which the Plans could obtain in an arm's-length

transaction with an unrelated party;

(b) The fair market rental amount for the Lease has been determined

by an independent qualified appraiser;

(c) Each Plan's allocable portion of the fair market value of both

the Leased Premises and the building where the Leased Premises are

located (the Building) represents no more than 20 percent (20%) of the

total assets of each Plan throughout the duration of the Lease;

(d) The interests of the Plans under the Lease are represented by

an independent, qualified fiduciary (the Independent Fiduciary);

(e) The fees received by the Independent Fiduciary, combined with

any other fees derived from any related parties, will not exceed 1% of

that person's annual income for each fiscal year that such person

continues to serve in the independent fiduciary capacity with respect

to the Lease;

(f) The Independent Fiduciary evaluated the Lease and deemed it to

be administratively feasible, protective and in the best interest of

the Plans;

(g) The Independent Fiduciary monitors the terms and the conditions

of the exemption (if granted) and the Lease throughout its duration,

and takes whatever action is necessary to protect the Plans' rights;

(h) At the discretion of the Independent Fiduciary, the Lease can

be extended for two additional five-year terms, provided that the

Independent Fiduciary requires independent appraisals of the Leased

Premises to be performed at the time of each extension of the Lease so

as to ensure that LM Holdings continues to pay fair market rent, and

such rent is not less that either the initial base rent or the amount

paid during the most recent annual term; and

(i) Within 90 days of publication in the Federal Register of a

notice granting this proposed exemption, LM Holdings files with the

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 5330 (Return of Initial Excise

[[Page 29907]]

Taxes for Pension and Profit Sharing Plans) and pays all excise taxes

applicable under section 4975(a) of the Code that are due by reason of

the existence of the Lease as a prohibited transaction prior to

February 1, 1999.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This exemption, if granted, will be effective as of

February 1, 1999.

Summary of Facts and Representations

1. The Plans are a profit sharing plan and a money purchase plan

which were established in February, 1994. As of July 15, 1998, the

Plans had two participants, Mr. Michael Leighty and Mr. Patrick McCarty

(Mr. Leighty and Mr. McCarty, respectively). Mr. Leighty and Mr.

McCarty are also the Plans' trustees. As of December 31, 1997, the P/S

Plan and the M/P Plan had $924,350 and $616,234 in total net assets,

respectively. Messrs. Leighty and McCarty are the only participants of

the Plans, the only trustees of the Plans and the sole employees and

shareholders of LM Holdings, Inc. (LM Holdings) and Premier Funding

Group, Inc (Premier Funding).

Premier Funding is the sponsor of the Plans. Premier Funding and LM

Holdings are both incorporated in the State of Texas and are located in

Arlington, Texas. Both corporations are jointly owned on a 50%-50%

basis by Messrs. Leighty and McCarty. Premier Funding and LM Holdings

are in the business of acquiring financial instruments, real estate and

other assets.

2. The Leased Premises and the Building are located at 2400 Garden

Park Court, Arlington, Texas. The Building was owned by Ed Thulin (Mr.

Thulin), an unrelated third party, until December 16, 1997. LM Holdings

had leased approximately 700 square feet in the Building from Mr.

Thulin under the terms and conditions of the subject Lease, as

originally agreed to by the parties.

However, on December 16, 1997, the Plans purchased the Building

from Mr. Thulin, for $210,000. Therefore, as of December 16, 1997, the

Lease was between the Plans and LM Holdings, which made the Lease a

prohibited transaction under the Act.14 In this regard, the

applicant represents that within 90 days of publication in the Federal

Register of a notice granting this proposed exemption, LM Holdings will

file Form 5330 (Return of Initial Excise Taxes for Pension and Profit

Sharing Plans) with the IRS and pay all excise taxes applicable under

section 4975(a) of the Code that are due by reason of the existence of

the Lease prior to February 1, 1999, the effective date of this

exemption.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\14\ Section 406(a)(1)(A) of the Act prohibits, in pertinent

part, a plan fiduciary from causing a plan to engage in a

transaction which constitutes a leasing of property between the plan

and a party in interest.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. After purchasing the Building, the Plans commissioned an

appraisal (the Appraisal) of the Leased Premises by an independent,

qualified appraiser (see paragraph 5 below). The Appraisal determined

the fair market rental value of the Leased Premises to be approximately

$7 per rentable square foot, or $782.25 monthly. The Lease was amended

on May 5, 1998, whereby the original terms were modified to reflect the

fair market rental amount as determined by the Appraisal.15

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\15\ However, under the Lease as amended by the parties pursuant

to the Appraisal, the Landlord and the Tenant have agreed to round

off this number to $785 per month.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Furthermore, to comply with the fair market rental amount

determined by the Appraisal, LM Holdings has made an additional rental

payment of $530 to the Plans. The applicant represents that this amount

is equal to the difference between the fair market rental value of the

Leased Premises and the actual rent that was paid for the Leased

Premises by LM Holdings since the beginning of the Lease. This amount

was computed by the applicant's attorney and was based on fair market

rental amount set forth in the Appraisal.

4. The applicant is now requesting an individual exemption,

effective as of February 1, 1999, which is the date that an

independent, qualified fiduciary was appointed to represent the Plans

for purposes of the Lease (as discussed further below). The parties to

the Lease will be the Plans (doing business as PFGI Realty) and LM

Holdings. Under the Lease as it now exists between the parties, the

Leased Premises include approximately 1,341 square feet of the total

rentable 5,196 square feet in the Building.16 LM Holdings

(i.e., the Tenant) will pay $785 per month during the first year of the

Lease. Thereafter, on each annual anniversary of the Lease during the

initial term and any subsequent renewal periods (discussed more fully

below), the rent will be adjusted by the Independent Fiduciary based on

the percent change in the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) as

published in the Wall Street Journal for the previous year. This annual

adjustment may not fall below the higher of the base rate of $785 per

month or the amount paid on a monthly basis during the most recent

annual term.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\16\ There are three other tenants in the Building, who

separately lease the remaining rentable space. Thus, the Leased

Premises represent approximately 25.8% of the Building's rentable

space.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Under the terms of the Lease, LM Holdings will be responsible for

electricity, with all other expenses being paid by the owner of the

Building (i.e., the Plans).17 The initial term of the Lease

is scheduled to end on May 5, 2003. At the discretion of the

Independent Fiduciary, the Lease can be extended for two additional

five year terms. The Independent Fiduciary will require independent

appraisals to be performed at the time of each extension of the Lease

so as to ensure that LM Holdings continues to pay fair market rent.

However, the new rents for the Leased Premises set at the time of any

extensions of the Lease will not be less than the rent received by the

Plans during the prior leasing period.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\17\ The applicant states that the terms of the Lease are

identical to the other current leases in the Building. Furthermore,

the applicant maintains that the remaining monthly bills for the

Building are gas, water and lawn care. These items are not

separately metered and are paid by the owner of the Building. The

applicant represents that this is consistent with the comparable

buildings analyzed in the Appraisal.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Furthermore, the Lease requires that LM Holdings, as the tenant,

provide public liability and property damage insurance for its business

operations on the Leased Premises in the amount of $500,000. This

insurance policy names the Plans as the insured.

5. As stated above, the fair market rent of the Leased Premises was

established by the Appraisal dated April 20, 1998. The Appraisal was

prepared by Thomas S. Haines, MAI and Wayne Burgdorf, MAI of Hanes,

Jorgensen & Burgdorf, Ltd., Diversified Real Estate Services located in

Arlington, Texas. The Appraisal relied on eight comparable rentals in

the surrounding area to determine the fair market rental value of the

Leased Premises. The addendums to the Appraisal (the Addendums), dated

May 12, 1998 and May 22, 1998, respectively, state that the fair market

rent for the Leased Premises is $7.00/square foot fixed, which equates

to $782.25 a month, or $9,387 a year, for a five-year lease.

6. The Lease will be monitored by Gary J. Manny (Mr. Manny), who

will serve as the Independent Fiduciary on behalf of the Plans for

purposes of the Lease. Mr. Manny was appointed as the Independent

Fiduciary on February 1, 1999, and has served in that capacity for the

Plans since that date. Mr. Manny represents that he is an attorney who

has general knowledge of ERISA, and the regulations thereunder. Mr.

Manny also represents that he has acted before in a fiduciary capacity

as a executor,

[[Page 29908]]

guardian and trustee for various clients. Thus, Mr. Manny states that

he has experience in protecting the rights of the parties involved in

such transactions. Mr. Manny states that he understands the duties,

responsibilities and liabilities of acting in a fiduciary capacity for

the Plans.

7. Mr. Manny represents that he is independent of LM Holdings,

Premier Funding, Mr. Leighty and Mr. McCarty (the Related Parties), and

has no interest in any of their business activities. In this regard,

Mr. Manny states that he has done work in the past for the Related

Parties. However, Mr. Manny's fees from the Related Parties represented

less than one percent (1%) of his total annual billings. Mr. Manny

further represents that for each year that he serves as the Independent

Fiduciary for the Plans, his fees for serving in this capacity,

combined with any other fees from the Related Parties, will not exceed

1% of his annual billings.

8. Mr. Manny states that he has reviewed the Lease and the Plans'

investment portfolios. Mr. Manny concludes that the Lease will be

protective of the Plans and consistent with the Plans' investment needs

and objectives. In this regard, Mr. Manny notes that the fair market

value of the Building, and the Leased Premises, represent less than

twenty percent (20%) of each Plan's total assets, and also of the

combined assets of the Plans.18

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\18\ The applicant states that the approximate value of the

Building is $210,495, which represents 11.5% of the P/S Plan and

11.5% of the M/P Plan. This is because the ownership of the building

is allocated, as all other assets in the Plans, 60% to the P/S Plan

and 40% to the M/P Plan. The applicants represent that all rents for

office space in the Building are allocated in the same manner.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Manny states that the Lease will be in the best interest of the

Plans and its participants. Mr. Manny believes that the Lease will be

an appropriate investment for the Plans with adequate safeguards and

protections.

9. Mr. Manny will monitor the terms and conditions of the Lease

throughout its initial term and any renewal periods. Mr. Manny

represents that he will have access to the books and records of the

Plans, and will make sure that rental payments under the Lease are paid

on time. Mr. Manny will review the Lease annually to ensure that all

annual automatic adjustments to the rent are made based on the percent

change in the CPI Index from the previous year. Mr. Manny will ensure

that monthly rental payments are adjusted annually, as appropriate. Mr.

Manny will also ensure that the adjusted rental payments never fall

below the amount paid for the Leased Premises during the most recent

annual period. Mr. Manny will monitor the value of the Building to

ensure that each Plan's allocable portion of the Building and the

Leased Premises represent no more than 20% of the total assets of each

Plan throughout duration of the Lease.

Mr. Manny believes that the Lease is administratively feasible, in

the best interest and protective of the Plans. As the Independent

Fiduciary, Mr. Manny will represent the interests of the Plans at all

times. Mr. Manny will monitor compliance by the LM Holdings, as the

tenant, with the terms and conditions of the Lease, and will take

whatever action is necessary to safeguard the interests of the Plans

and its participants.19

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\19\ In this regard, the applicant makes a request regarding a

successor independent fiduciary. Specifically, if it becomes

necessary in the future to appoint a successor independent fiduciary

(the Successor) to replace Mr. Manny, the applicant will notify the

Department sixty (60) days in advance of the appointment of the

Successor. Any Successor will have the responsibilities, experience

and independence similar to those of Mr. Manny.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. In summary, the applicant represents that the transaction

satisfies the statutory criteria of section 408(a) of the Act and

section 4975(c)(2) of the Code because:

(a) All terms and conditions of the Lease are at least as favorable

to the Plans as those which the Plans could obtain in an arm's-length

transaction with an unrelated party;

(b) The fair market rental value of the Leased Premises has been

determined by an independent qualified appraiser;

(c) Each Plan's allocable portion of the fair market value of both

the Leased Premises and the Building will represent no more than 20% of

the total assets of each Plan throughout the duration of the Lease;

(d) The interests of the Plans under the Lease are represented by

the Independent Fiduciary;

(e) The fees received by the Independent Fiduciary, combined with

any other fees derived from any related parties, will not exceed 1% of

that person's annual income for each fiscal year that such person

continues to serve in the independent fiduciary capacity with respect

to the Lease;

(f) The Independent Fiduciary evaluated the Lease and deemed it to

be administratively feasible, protective and in the best interest of

the Plans;

(g) The Independent Fiduciary will monitor the terms and the

conditions of the exemption (if granted) and the Lease throughout its

duration, and will take whatever action is necessary to protect the

Plans' rights;

(h) At the discretion of the Independent Fiduciary, the Lease can

be extended for two additional five-year terms, provided that the

Independent Fiduciary requires independent appraisals of the Leased

Premises to be performed at the time of each extension of the Lease so

as to ensure that LM Holdings continues to pay fair market rent, and

such rent will not be less than the current base rate of $785 per

month, or the amount paid on a monthly basis during the most recent

annual term; and

(i) Within 90 days of publication in the Federal Register of a

notice granting this proposed exemption, LM Holdings will file with the

IRS Form 5330 (Return of Initial Excise Taxes for Pension and Profit

Sharing Plans) and pay all excise taxes applicable under section

4975(a) of the Code that are due by reason of the existence of the

Lease as a prohibited transaction prior to February 1, 1999.

Notice to Interested Persons

The applicant represents that, within five (5) business days of the

publication of the notice of proposed exemption (the Notice) in the

Federal Register, all interested persons will receive a copy of the

Notice, and a copy of the supplemental statement, as required by 29 CFR

2570.43(b)(2). Comments and hearing requests on the proposed exemption

are due thirty-five (35) days after the date of publication of the

Notice in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ekaterina A. Uzlyan of the Department,

telephone (202) 219-8883. (This is not a toll-free number.)

The Unaka Company, Incorporated Employees' Profit Sharing Plan and

Trust (the Plan) Located in Greenville, Tennessee

[Application No. D-10722]

Proposed Exemption

The Department is considering granting an exemption under the

authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the

Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 C.F.R. part

2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).

If the exemption is granted the restrictions of sections

406(a)(1)(A) through (D), 406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) of the Act and the

sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of the Code,

by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code shall not

apply to: 20

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\20\ For purposes of this exemption, references to specific

provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer

also to the corresponding provisions of the Code.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) The assignment (the Assignment) by the Plan to the Unaka

Company,

[[Page 29909]]

Incorporated (Unaka), the sponsoring employer and a party in interest

with respect to the Plan, of any and all claims, demands, and/or causes

of action which the Plan may have against certain members of the Plan

Administrative Committee (the PAC) and other involved parties

(collectively, the Responsible Fiduciaries) for breach of fiduciary

duty under the Act, during the period from July 1, 1996 to July 31,

1998;

(b) In exchange for the Assignment, described in paragraph (a),

above, the interest-free, non-recourse loan (the Loan) by Unaka to the

Plan in an amount equal to the difference between $413 and the fair

market value per share for the common stock of Unaka (the Stock) held

by the Plan, in connection with the sale of such Stock by the Plan to

Unaka, pursuant to the statutory exemption, as set forth in section

408(e) of the Act; 21

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\21\ The Department, herein, expresses no opinion as to the

applicability of the statutory exemption provided by section 408(e)

of the Act to the sale by the Plan of its Unaka Stock to Unaka or as

to whether the conditions set forth in such statutory exemption are

satisfied in the execution of such transaction. Further, the

Department, herein, is offering no relief for transactions other

than those proposed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) The possible repayment of such Loan to Unaka from the cash

proceeds of the recovery, if any, from a judgment or settlement of the

litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries;

(d) The interest-free, non-recourse extension of credit (the

Extension of Credit) by Unaka to the Plan of certain expenses arising

out of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries, effective as

of, May 1, 1999, the date when expenses incurred by the Plan in

bringing such litigation were first paid by Unaka; and

(e) The possible receipt by Unaka of reimbursement of such

litigation expenses from the cash proceeds of the recovery, if any,

from a judgment or settlement of the litigation against the Responsible

Fiduciaries; provided that the following conditions are satisfied:

(1) The Plan will pay no interest in connection with the Loan or

the Extension of Credit;

(2) None of the assets of the Plan will be pledged to secure either

the amount of the Loan or the amount of the Extension of Credit;

(3) Repayment to Unaka of the amount of the Loan and reimbursement

to Unaka of the amount of the Extension of Credit shall be restricted

solely to the cash proceeds of the recovery, if any, from a judgment or

settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries;

(4) To the extent the amount of the cash proceeds, if any, from any

judgment or settlement of the litigation against the Responsible

Fiduciaries is equal to or less than the amount due to Unaka as

repayment for the Loan and reimbursement of the Extension of Credit,

the Plan shall not be liable to Unaka for any amount;

(5) To the extent the cash proceeds, if any, from any judgment or

settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries

exceeds the total amount of the Loan, plus the amount of the Extension

of Credit, such excess amount will be allocated to the accounts of the

participants of the Plan; with the exception that no such allocation

will be made to the account of Robert Austin, Jr. in the Plan;

(6) The transactions which are the subject of this exemption do not

involve any risk of loss either to the Plan or to any of the

participants and beneficiaries of the Plan;

(7) The Plan will not incur any expenses as a result of the

transactions which are the subject of this exemption;

(8) Notwithstanding the Assignment by the Plan of its rights

against the Responsible Fiduciaries, the Plan does not release any

claims, demands, and/or causes of action which it may have against

Unaka and/or its affiliates;

(9) All of the terms of the transactions are at least as favorable

to the Plan as those which the Plan could obtain in similar

transactions negotiated at arm's-length with unrelated third parties;

(10) The Plan receives no less than the fair market value for the

Assignment, as of the date of the closing on the transfer of the

Assignment;

(11) Prior to the Plan's entering the transactions, an independent,

qualified fiduciary (the I/F), who is acting on behalf of the Plan and

who is independent of Unaka and its affiliates, reviews, negotiates,

and approves the terms and conditions of the Loan, the Assignment, and

the Extension of Credit and determines that such transactions are

prudent, administratively feasible, in the interest of the Plan and its

participants and beneficiaries, and protective of the participants and

beneficiaries of the Plan;

(12) Throughout the duration of the transactions, the I/F monitors

the prosecution of the lawsuit against the Responsible Fiduciaries,

including but not limited to monitoring all costs and fees incurred in

connection with any litigation related to the proposed transactions,

monitors the division of the recovery, if any, from any judgment or

settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries to

ensure that the Plan receives the portion to which it is entitled and

that the Plan's interests are served, and monitors the terms and

conditions of the proposed transactions to ensure that such terms and

conditions are at all times satisfied;

(13) The I/F, acting on behalf of the Plan, shall have final

approval authority over any proposed settlement of any legal

proceedings against the Responsible Fiduciaries brought pursuant to the

terms of the Assignment; and

(14) In the event the I/F resigns, is removed, or for any reason is

unable to serve, including but not limited to the death or disability

of such I/F, or if at any time such I/F does not remain independent of

Unaka and its affiliates, such I/F will be replaced by a successor: (i)

Who is appointed immediately upon the occurrence of such event; (ii)

who is independent of Unaka and its affiliates; (iii) who is qualified

to serve as the I/F; and (iv) who assumes all the duties and

responsibilities of the predecessor

I/F.

Summary of Facts and Representations

1. The Plan, established on February 1, 1967, but amended and

restated on June 29, 1995, is a defined contribution profit sharing

plan which is designed to qualify under section 401(a) of the Code.

Contributions to the Plan are made by Unaka and by the participants in

the Plan. The Plan is an individual account plan which does not provide

for participant-directed investments. All contributions to the Plan are

invested by the trustee of the Plan, pursuant to the funding policy and

method, as determined by Unaka and by the Plan's investment manager.

Employees of Unaka and/or its subsidiaries are participants in the

Plan. As of January 1, 1997, the Plan had approximately 1,142

participants. From January 1, 1997 to February 11, 1999, distributions

of account balances were made to 209 participants, and 104 participants

were added to the Plan. Accordingly, as of March 1, 1999, there were

1,037 participants in the Plan.

As of June 30, 1998, the Plan had approximately $16.8 million in

assets on an unaudited basis, consisting of cash, mutual fund

interests, government and corporate bonds, and shares of stock. It is

represented that each participant's account shares a pro-rata portion

of the overall value of the general assets of the Plan.

In the past, Unaka, as Plan administrator, has delegated to certain

individuals, including, but not limited to certain officers and

employees of Unaka, the responsibilities of administering the Plan. In

this regard, until October 1997, the PAC

[[Page 29910]]

administered the Plan. It is represented that from June 1996 to October

1997, the PAC was comprised of Gordon H. Newman, Jerald K. Jaynes,

Lonnie F. Thompson, and Gary Landes. From May 1995 to June 1996, the

PAC was comprised of Gordon H. Newman, Robert Austin, Jr., and Gordon

Chalmers. Prior to that time the PAC members were Gordon H. Newman,

Terry O'Donovan, Powell Johnson, Dominick Jackson, and Ray Adams.

As discussed more fully below, in an agreement dated July 31, 1998,

as amended March 25, 1999, and April 7, 1999, an independent, qualified

individual was hired to serve as the trustee (the Trustee) of the Plan,

and an institutional investment manager was engaged to manage the

assets of the Plan and to serve as the I/F with respect to the

transactions which are the subject of this proposed exemption.

2. Established in 1950 in Greeneville, Tennessee, Unaka is a

holding corporation for the diverse industries of its wholly-owned

subsidiaries. These subsidiaries consist primarily of the MECO

Corporation, a manufacturer of barbecue grills and folding metal

furniture, SOPAKCO, a warehouse operator and manufacturer of packaged

foods, and Crown Point, an international food supply company

specializing in the buying and selling of food commodities.

Unaka is a privately held corporation whose stock is not traded on

any registered securities exchange. Another holding company, the Rolich

Corporation (Rolich), owns approximately 61 percent (61%) of the 54,000

issued and outstanding shares of the Stock of Unaka which has a $10 par

value. The Plan owns an additional 26 percent (26%) of the issued and

outstanding shares of Stock of Unaka. Members of the Austin family, as

discussed below, and various other individuals own the remaining 13

percent (13%) of the Unaka Stock.

3. In August of 1987, Robert Austin, Sr. purchased, through Rolich,

a controlling interest in Unaka. It is represented that at that time,

Rolich was owned by the members of the immediate family of Robert

Austin, Sr. In connection with Robert Austin, Sr.'s obtaining control

of Unaka, the Plan, on December 27 and 28, 1987, acquired 2,500 and

6,500 shares, respectively, of Unaka Stock directly from Unaka at a

price of $220 per share. Subsequently, on October 1, 1989, the Plan

purchased an additional 5,000 shares of Unaka Stock from Unaka at a

price of $250 per share.22

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\22\ Unaka represents that the acquisition by the Plan of Unaka

Stock both in December 1987, and October 1989, satisfied the

criteria of section 408(e) of the Act. The Department, herein,

expresses no opinion as to the applicability of the statutory

exemption provided by section 408(e) of the Act to the acquisition

in 1987 and 1989 of the Unaka Stock by the Plan or as to whether the

conditions set forth in such statutory exemption were satisfied in

the execution of such transactions. Further, the Department, herein,

is offering no relief for transactions other than those proposed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

With the deaths in 1990, of Robert Austin, and his wife, Mary T.

Austin, a struggle for control of Rolich and Unaka ensued among their

three children who are the heirs to their parents' estates. In this

regard, most of the litigation involves the struggle for control of

Unaka and Rolich among, Robert Austin, Jr., Lisa Austin, and Christy

Austin. Additional litigation is associated with the members of Unaka's

former management and with other shareholder derivative and non-

derivative suits. It is anticipated that these various legal disputes

may continue in the foreseeable future. However, it is represented that

as of April 1997, Robert Austin, Jr. obtained majority ownership of

Rolich and is currently serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors

of Unaka.

4. In October of 1996, the Plan entered into an agreement to sell

its Unaka Stock to Nothung, Inc. (Nothung), an entity owned by Robert

Austin, Jr., for a minimum price of $413 per share. It is represented

that certain Responsible Fiduciaries who were members of the PAC did

not complete the sale of the Plan's Unaka Stock, pursuant to the

agreement with Nothung. As a result, the PAC, acting on behalf of the

Plan, failed to sell the Plan's Unaka Stock to Nothung in October of

1996. Subsequently, the offer to purchase the Plan's Unaka Stock,

pursuant to the agreement with Nothung, lapsed on January 27, 1997.

5. With regard to the $413 per share price offered, pursuant to the

agreement with Nothung, it is represented that Mercer Capital

Management, Inc. (Mercer), an independent, qualified appraisal, valued

the Plan's Unaka Stock, as of May 31, 1996, on a marketable, minority

interest basis, at $413 per share. Of the three valuation

methodologies, Mercer employed the income approach and the asset-based

approach, but did not consider the market approach appropriate, because

at the time of the appraisal there had been too few arm's length

transactions in the Unaka Stock. Further, the Mercer appraisal did not

discount the value of the Plan's Unaka Stock for lack of marketability,

because: (1) Mercer believed it reasonable to assume that ongoing

negotiations with Unaka would result in an option for Plan participants

to put the shares to Unaka or to the Plan at the appraised fair market

value; (2) Mercer accepted that the original investment by the Plan in

Unaka Stock was based on assurances of reasonable treatment by the

remaining shareholders; and (3) Mercer accepted representations from

the Plan's legal counsel that there had been an intent and practice not

to consider marketability discounts in the valuation estimates used in

prior years.

6. The Plan currently holds 14,000 shares of Unaka Stock which

Unaka has offered to purchase at a price equal to the fair market value

of such Stock on the date the transaction is closed. It is represented

that the proposed sale by the Plan to Unaka of the Plan's Unaka Stock

will satisfy the criteria of section 408(e) of the Act.23

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\23\ See, footnote number 22, above.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In anticipation of the sale of the Plan's Unaka Stock to Unaka and

in anticipation of the transactions which are the subject of this

proposed exemption, it is represented that an appraisal, as of June 30,

1998, of the fair market value of the Unaka Stock was prepared by

Bernstein, Phalon & Conklin (BP&C), an independent, qualified

appraiser, with offices in Dallas, Texas. In determining the value of

the Unaka Stock, BP&C considered all three approaches to value, the

income approach, the asset-based approach, and the market approach. The

results of these valuation techniques applied to a minority interest of

the Plan's Unaka Stock on a closely held basis were as follows:

Income approach

$283 per share

Asset-based approach

$334 per share

Market approach

$292 per share.

After giving slightly greater weight to the income approach, because

that valuation method took into consideration the current and projected

business operations of Unaka, BP&C determined that the fair market

value of the equity of Unaka on a closely held, minority basis was $301

per share, as of June 30, 1998. Based on an appraised value of $301 per

share, approximately $4.2 million of the Plan's assets are currently

invested in Unaka Stock which constitutes approximately 25 percent

(25%) of the total assets held by the Plan.

The applicant has represented that an updated appraisal of the

Unaka Stock

[[Page 29911]]

will be obtained at the time of the closing of the sale of the Plan's

Unaka Stock. In this regard, in the engagement letter, dated September

11, 1998, BP&C acknowledges its responsibility for providing the fair

market value of the Plan's Unaka Stock, as of the date of the sale of

such shares, and for issuing a fairness opinion regarding such sale, if

appropriate.

7. In addition to the sale to Unaka of the Plan's Unaka Stock, it

is represented that the Plan intends to sell, assign, transfer, and

convey to Unaka any and all of the Plan's claims, demands, and causes

of action (including reimbursement of reasonable legal fees, expenses,

and costs) which the Plan may have against the Responsible Fiduciaries

for breach of fiduciary duties during the period between July 1, 1996

to July 31, 1998. It is represented that this time span was chosen to

cover the period during which the Responsible Fiduciaries were in

control of the Plan and its assets and in order to cover any and all

potential claims or causes of action that may arise out of any acts on

the part of the Responsible Fiduciaries. In this regard, July 1, 1996,

is the date Robert Austin, Jr. was removed from the PAC, and July 31,

1998, is the last date before the Trustee, who is the successor to the

PAC, was appointed.

Included without limitation in the Assignment are all claims as to:

(i) The value of the Unaka Stock held by the Plan, including its

purchase, sale, transfer, voting, valuation, and appraisal; (ii) any

offers, attempts, or agreements to purchase, transfer, assign, vote,

pledge, or hypothecate such Stock, including but not limited to the

offer/agreement to purchase the Stock made by Nothung in October 1996;

and (iii) any third party claims, demands, and causes of action arising

therefrom. Notwithstanding the Assignment by the Plan of its rights

against the Responsible Fiduciaries, it is represented that the

Trustee, on behalf of the Plan, will not release any claims, demands,

and/or causes of action which the Plan may have against Unaka and/or

its affiliates.

Due to the uncertainty of the outcome of the litigation between the

Plan and the Responsible Fiduciaries, it is represented that it is

difficult to calculate a precise value of the rights against the

Responsible Fiduciaries which the Plan proposes to assign to Unaka. In

this regard at the request of the I/F who is also the Plan's investment

manager, BP&C were engaged on March 25, 1999, to express an opinion

concerning the approximate fair market value of the Assignment. As part

of the analysis, BP&C took into consideration: (i) The likelihood of

the Plan prevailing successfully in the lawsuit against the Responsible

Fiduciaries; (ii) the likelihood of collecting on any judgment awarded

by the court; and (iii) the ability of the Plan to sell the Assignment

to a willing buyer. Based on its analysis, BP&C concluded that the fair

market value of the Assignment is negligible.

8. In exchange for the Assignment, Unaka proposes to lend to the

Plan the difference between the value of $413 per share for the Unaka

Stock (as set forth in the agreement with Nothung and as set forth in

the 1966 Mercer appraisal) and the fair market value, as of the date

the proposed transactions are closed, of the Plan's Unaka Stock, as

determined by the I/F after considering the appraised value of such

Stock at closing. Because the offer price for the Plan's Unaka Stock

evidenced by the agreement with Nothung was based upon the Mercer

appraisal which did not consider a discount for lack of marketability,

it is the position of the applicant that the $413 per share appraised

value of the Plan's Unaka Stock includes a ``premium.'' Although at the

time of the agreement with Nothung, the applicant maintains that the

Plan could have obtained a control premium for the sale of its Unaka

Stock, it is represented that the Plan has no current or foreseeable

ability to attract such a premium in the future. Furthermore, in the

opinion of the applicant the proposed transaction will restore this

``premium,'' because there is no known market for the minority block of

Unaka Stock held by the Plan.

9. In addition to the transactions described above, involving the

Assignment and the Loan, relief has been requested for an Extension of

Credit between Unaka and the Plan of the expenses arising out of the

litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries. In this regard, Unaka

proposes to extend credit to the Plan of an amount equal to the cost

incurred in bringing suit against such Responsible Fiduciaries. It is

represented that due to constraints imposed by the statute of

limitations, it will be necessary for the Plan to begin legal

proceedings against the Responsible Fiduciaries, prior to the date when

a final exemption can be granted for the proposed transactions. In this

regard, Unaka has agreed (in anticipation of the subject transactions)

to pay on behalf of the Plan, beginning May 1, 1999, all expenses

incurred by the Plan in filing and pursuing the litigation against the

Responsible Fiduciaries. Accordingly, relief, if granted, for the

Extension of Credit, as described in paragraph (d) above, has been made

effective, as of May 1, 1999. In the event a final exemption is issued,

it is represented that all amounts paid by Unaka, prior to the

Assignment, to cover the expenses incurred by the Plan in filing and

pursuing the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries shall be

added to such additional amounts expended by Unaka after the Assignment

in connection with the legal proceedings against the Responsible

Fiduciaries. In the event a final exemption is not granted by November

30, 1999, the Plan will have the option of continuing the litigation

against the Responsible Fiduciaries, in its own right and at its own

expense; but, Unaka shall not have the right to reimbursement for any

payments made during the seven (7) months period from May 1, 1999, to

November 30, 1999, of the Plan's expenses in connection with the

litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries.

It is represented that both the Loan and the Extension of Credit

will be without interest and without recourse against the Plan. In this

regard, repayment to Unaka of the amount of the Loan and reimbursement

to Unaka of the amount of the Extension of Credit shall be restricted

solely to the cash proceeds of the recovery, if any, from a judgment or

settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries. It is

represented that to the extent the cash proceeds of any judgment or

settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries

exceeds the total amount of the Loan, plus the amount of the Extension

of Credit, such amount will be allocated to the accounts of the

participants of such Plan, with the exception that no such allocation

will be made to the account of Robert Austin, Jr. in the Plan. It is

represented that to the extent the cash proceeds of the recovery, if

any, from such litigation is equal to or less than the aggregate amount

of the Loan and the Extension of Credit, the Plan will not be

responsible for any amount. In this regard, it is represented that

Unaka will waive the repayment of any outstanding balance on the Loan

and any balance on the Extension of Credit.24

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\24\ It is represented that to the extent Unaka waives repayment

of the outstanding balance of the Loan and the Extension of Credit,

or to the extent that the Plan receives any excess recovery over the

aggregate amount of the Loan and the Extension of Credit, Unaka will

amend the Plan to specify the allocation of such amounts in a manner

so as to ensure that the Plan will not violate either section

401(a)(4) or section 415 of the Code. Further, Unaka represents that

it will submit an amendment to the Internal Revenue Service (the

IRS) for a favorable determination letter for the Plan, as amended,

by such amendment. Unaka represents that it will make any changes

required by the IRS regarding such allocations.

To the extent that waiving the outstanding balance of the Loan

and the Extension of Credit is deemed to be a contribution to the

Plan, Unaka represents that such amounts will not be treated as a

contribution prior to the date when such amounts are either repaid

or waived. However, Unaka represents that it intends to deduct all

such amounts deemed to be contributions to the Plan, as of the date

they are so deemed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 29912]]

10. As a fiduciary of the Plan and as an employer any of whose

employees are covered by the Plan, Unaka is a party in interest with

respect to the Plan, pursuant to section 3(14)(A) and 3(14)(C) of the

Act. The proposed transactions will violate section 406(a)(1)(B) of the

Act, because the execution of the Loan between Unaka and the Plan and

the Extension of Credit by Unaka to the Plan each constitutes a lending

of money between a plan and party in interest which is prohibited by

the Act. In addition, the Assignment between the Plan and Unaka

constitutes a transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of a party in

interest of the income or assets of the Plan for which relief from

section 406(a)(1)(D) of the Act would be necessary.

Further, the applicant has requested relief for violations of

section 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act that may arise from Unaka's

status as a sponsor and administrator of the Plan. In this regard, the

proposed transactions could involve a fiduciary dealing with the assets

of the plan in his own interest and/or acting in his individual

capacity on behalf of a party whose interests are adverse to the

interests of the plan or it participants and beneficiaries.

11. With respect to the proposed transactions, Unaka notes that a

class exemption, Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 80-26 (PTCE 80-

26), provides an exemption for interest-free loans by parties in

interest to plans. However, PTCE 80-26 is applicable where loan

proceeds are used for payment of ordinary operating expenses of a plan

or for a period of no more than three (3) days for a purpose incidental

to the ordinary operation of a plan. It is represented that Unaka is

uncertain whether the proposed transactions are of the type

contemplated by class exemption PTCE 80-26.

However, Unaka points out that individual exemptions have been

granted in cases involving an extension of credit from a plan sponsor

to a plan and an assignment back from the plan to the plan sponsor of

the plan's litigation rights and interests. In the opinion of Unaka,

the fact that individual exemptions have been granted in similar

circumstances indicates that the proposed transactions are in line with

current administrative practices. Accordingly, Unaka believes that the

request for an individual exemption is appropriate.

12. Unaka represents that the proposed transactions are

administratively feasible in that the nature of the transactions does

not require ongoing supervision by the Department. In this regard, the

Plan has engaged the Trustee and the I/F, who is also the investment

manager of the Plan. In addition, it is represented that all necessary

safeguards are incorporated into the documents evidencing the

Assignment, the Loan, and the Extension of Credit between the Plan and

Unaka.

13. Unaka represents that the proposed transactions will preserve

the value of retirement accounts of participants in the Plan and will

ensure that such participants do not suffer from the failure by the

Responsible Fiduciaries to sell the Unaka Stock, pursuant to the terms

of the agreement with Nothung. In this regard, it is represented that

denial of the proposed exemption would cause the participants of the

Plan to shoulder the decline in the value of the Unaka Stock caused by

events wholly outside their control. Further, the Plan would avoid an

expensive and time-consuming litigation against the Responsible

Fiduciaries the outcome of which is not assured. In addition, it is

uncertain whether the Responsible Fiduciaries will have sufficient

assets to satisfy a judgment, if one were to be awarded to the Plan.

14. Unaka represents that the proposed transactions are in the

interest of the Plan in that such transactions will reinforce the

participants' confidence in the security of their retirement funds and

allow for diversification of assets. In this regard, the Plan will

immediately receive the proceeds from the Loan and can, upon receipt,

invest such proceeds in other assets to produce additional earnings for

the participants in the Plan. Further, the Plan will benefit in that it

will not incur any expenses as a result of the transactions.

15. Unaka represents that the terms of the proposed exemption

adequately protect the rights of the participants and beneficiaries of

the Plan. Neither the Loan nor the Extension of Credit will bear any

interest. The assets of the Plan will not be pledged as collateral to

secure the Loan or the Extension of Credit, nor will the assets of the

Plan be used to repay the Loan or the Extension of Credit, other than

solely from the cash proceeds of the recovery, if any, from a judgment

or settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries. To

the extent the amount of the cash proceeds from such recovery, if any,

is equal to or less than the amount of the Loan and the amount of the

Extension of Credit, it is represented that Unaka will waive the

repayment of any outstanding balance on the Loan and any balance on the

Extension of Credit. In short, it is represented that as a result of

the proposed transactions, neither the Plan nor the participants will

experience a risk of loss.

16. As an additional safeguard, pursuant to the terms of an

agreement signed, July 31, 1998, as amended March 25, 1999, and April

7, 1999, the Strategic Investment Counsel Corporation (STRINCO) of

Dallas, Texas, has agreed to serve as the I/F with respect to the

proposed transactions and also to serve as the investment manager with

respect to the investment and reinvestment of the assets of the Plan.

Pursuant to the same agreement, Colin M. Henderson (Mr. Henderson), the

President and chief investment officer of STRINCO, has accepted the

appointment to serve, in his individual capacity, as the Trustee of the

Plan.

It is represented that STRINCO, as the I/F and the investment

manager for the Plan, has agreed to serve throughout the duration of

the proposed transactions. The Department notes that the proposed

exemption is conditioned upon the I/F, throughout the duration of the

transactions, monitoring the prosecution of the lawsuit against the

Responsible Fiduciaries, including but not limited to monitoring all

costs and fees incurred in connection with any litigation related to

the proposed transactions, monitoring the division of the recovery, if

any, from any judgment or settlement of the litigation against the

Responsible Fiduciaries to ensure that the Plan receives the portion to

which it is entitled and that its interests are served, and monitoring

the terms and conditions of the proposed transactions to ensure that

such terms and conditions are at all times satisfied. The exemption

contains a further condition that specifies that in the event the I/F

resigns, is removed, or for any reason is unable to serve, including

but not limited to the death or disability of such I/F, or if at any

time such I/F does not remain independent of Unaka and its affiliates,

such I/F will be replaced by a successor: (i) Who is appointed

immediately upon the occurrence of such event; (ii) who is independent

of Unaka and its affiliates; (iii) who is qualified to serve as the I/

F; and (iv) who assumes all the duties and responsibilities of the

predecessor I/F.

STRINCO has represented that it has extensive experience as a

service

[[Page 29913]]

provider to employee benefit plans. Further, STRINCO represents that it

is independent of all of the parties to the proposed exemption. In this

regard, the projected income from Unaka represent a small percentage of

the projected revenues of STRINCO. Specifically, it is represented that

STRINCO's revenues from fees paid by Unaka will constitute less than 3

percent (3%) of STRINCO's projected total revenues for 1999.

STRINCO has acknowledged its status as an independent fiduciary

under the Act, including the responsibilities and duties of a fiduciary

involving the assets of the Plan. Specifically, prior to the Plan's

entering the transactions, STRINCO is responsible for reviewing,

negotiating, and approving the terms and conditions of the Loan, the

Assignment, and the Extension of Credit and determining whether such

transactions are prudent, administratively feasible, in the interest of

the Plan and its participants and beneficiaries, and protective of the

participants and beneficiaries of the Plan. It is represented that

STRINCO has been involved since its engagement in 1998, in the

evaluation, analysis, and design of the proposed transactions. In this

regard, STRINCO represents that it has at all times retained complete

discretion as to the Plan's participation in the proposed transactions

and has been actively involved in the negotiation of the terms of

conditions of such transactions. Further, STRINCO represents that

throughout the duration of the transactions, it will monitor the

prosecution of the lawsuit against the Responsible Fiduciaries,

including but not limited to monitoring all costs and fees incurred in

connection with any litigation related to the proposed transactions;

monitor the division of the recovery, if any, from any judgment or

settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries to

ensure that the Plan receives the portion to which it is entitled and

that its interests are served; and monitor the terms and conditions of

the proposed transactions to ensure that such terms and conditions are

at all times satisfied. In addition, STRINCO, the I/F acting on behalf

of the Plan, shall have final approval authority over any proposed

settlement of any legal proceedings against the Responsible Fiduciaries

brought pursuant to the terms of the Assignment. In this regard, it is

represented that such final approval authority is not intended to and

does not confer upon STRINCO, as I/F to the Plan, any authority to

initiate settlement negotiations nor any right to negotiate any

specific terms of settlement.

STRINCO has analyzed each of the three proposed transactions and

has made independent investigation of the representations made as to

each of the transactions, including significant due diligence into the

background surrounding the failure of the Responsible Fiduciaries to

sell the Plan's Unaka Stock, pursuant to the agreement with Nothung. It

is represented that Mr. Henderson, as President of STRINCO, his

counsel, and BP&C have visited the Unaka facilities, interviewed its

officers and reviewed documentation involving the Plan, including

minutes of the PAC meetings and certain minutes of the meetings of the

Board of Directors of Unaka.

With respect to its analysis of the Loan, Assignment, and Extension

of Credit, STRINCO states that the proposed transactions do not bind

any of the Plan's assets as collateral. Furthermore, the proposed

transactions, in the worst case, obtain a premium for the Plan in

excess of any loss actually suffered by the Plan or its participants

and beneficiaries. In this regard, STRINCO affirms that in the event no

recovery is made in the suit against the Responsible Fiduciaries, the

amount of Loan will be automatically forgiven, and the Plan will have

gained a premium (i.e. cash equal to the difference between the price

of the Plan's Unaka Stock, pursuant to the agreement with Nothung and

the current fair market value of such shares). In the event a

substantial amount is recovered in the suit against the Responsible

Fiduciaries, the Plan will still gain a premium in recovering

everything in excess of the amount of the Loan (less the expenses of

litigation). In the opinion of STRINCO, regardless of the outcome of

the litigation, the Loan puts the Plan and its participants and

beneficiaries in the position they would have been in if the Unaka

Stock had been sold to Nothung.

In order to receive the Loan, the Plan is required to enter into

the Assignment. In the opinion of STRINCO, the Assignment allows a suit

to be brought against the Responsible Fiduciaries without the Plan

assuming any risks associated with such suit and without having to

spend any of its own funds to do so. In light of Unaka's inability to

retain any of the proceeds of such suit, other than recoupment of the

outstanding balance of the Loan and any expenses of such litigation, in

the opinion of STRINCO the Assignment has minimal, if any, value in the

hands of the assignee. Based on this reasoning, STRINCO has concluded

the proposed transactions are at least as favorable to the Plan as any

transaction between the Plan and a third party.

With respect to the Extension of Credit by Unaka of the litigation

expenses, STRINCO points out that, if the Plan were not to participate

in the proposed transactions and instead bring suit in its own right

against the Responsible Fiduciaries, the Plan would be required to pay

the litigation expenses prior to any potential recovery and regardless

of such recovery. Accordingly, STRINCO has concluded, based upon its

analysis described above, that each of the proposed transactions

represents a prudent and conservative course of action which is

feasible and fair; in the best interests of the participants and

beneficiaries; and protective of the assets of the Plan which are held

for the exclusive benefit of the participants and beneficiaries.

17. In summary, the applicant represents that the proposed

transactions meet the statutory criteria for an exemption under section

408(a) of the Act and 4975(c)(2) of the Code because:

(1) The Plan will pay no interest in connection with the Loan or

the Extension of Credit;

(2) None of the assets of the Plan will be pledged to secure either

the amount of the Loan or the amount of the Extension of Credit;

(3) Repayment to Unaka of the amount of the Loan and reimbursement

to Unaka of the amount of the Extension of Credit shall be restricted

solely to the cash proceeds of the recovery, if any, from a judgment or

settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries;

(4) To the extent the amount of the cash proceeds, if any, from any

judgment or settlement of the litigation against the Responsible

Fiduciaries is equal to or less than the amount due to Unaka as

repayment for the Loan and reimbursement of the Extension of Credit,

the Plan shall not be liable to Unaka for any amount;

(5) To the extent the cash proceeds, if any, from any judgment or

settlement of the litigation against the Responsible Fiduciaries

exceeds the total amount of the Loan and the amount of the Extension of

Credit, such amount will be allocated to the accounts of the

participants of the Plan; with the exception that no such allocation

will be made to the account of Robert Austin, Jr. in the Plan;

(6) The transactions which are the subject of this exemption do not

involve any risk of loss either to the Plan or to any of the

participants and beneficiaries of the Plan;

(7) The Plan will not incur any expenses as a result of the

transactions which are the subject of this exemption;

[[Page 29914]]

(8) Notwithstanding the Assignment by the Plan of its rights

against the Responsible Fiduciaries, the Plan, will not release any

claims, demands, and/or causes of action which it may have against

Unaka and/or its affiliates;

(9) All of the terms of the transactions are at least as favorable

to the Plan as those which the Plan could obtain in similar

transactions negotiated at arm's-length with unrelated third parties;

(10) The Plan receives no less than the fair market value for the

Assignment, as of the date of the closing on the transaction;

(11) Prior to the Plan's entering the transactions, STRINCO, who is

acting as I/F on behalf of the Plan and who is independent of Unaka and

its affiliates, will review, negotiate, and approve the terms and

conditions of the Loan, the Assignment, and the Extension of Credit and

will determine that such transactions are prudent, administratively

feasible, in the interest of the Plan and its participants and

beneficiaries, and protective of the participants and beneficiaries;

(12) Throughout the duration of the transactions, STRINCO, as the

I/F, will monitor the prosecution of the lawsuit against the

Responsible Fiduciaries, including but not limited to monitoring all

costs and fees incurred in connection with any litigation related to

the proposed transactions; will monitor the division of the recovery,

if any, from any judgment or settlement of the litigation against the

Responsible Fiduciaries to ensure that the Plan receives the portion to

which it is entitled and that its interests are served; and will

monitor the terms and conditions of the proposed transactions to ensure

that such terms and conditions are at all times satisfied;

(13) STRINCO, the I/F acting on behalf of the Plan, shall have

final approval authority over any proposed settlement of any legal

proceedings against the Responsible Fiduciaries brought pursuant to the

terms of the Assignment; and

(14) In the event STRINCO resigns, is removed, or for any reason is

unable to serve, or if at any time STRINCO does not remain independent

of Unaka and its affiliates, STRINCO will be replaced by a successor:

(i) Who is appointed immediately upon the occurrence of such event;

(ii) who is independent of Unaka and its affiliates; (iii) who is

qualified to serve as the I/F; and (iv) who assumes all the duties and

responsibilities of STRINCO.

Notice to Interested Persons

Those persons who may be interested in the pendency of the

requested exemption include any person who presently is a participant

in the Plan or any other person who is entitled to receive benefits

under the Plan. It is represented that these two classes of interested

persons will be notified through different methods.

In this regard, it is represented that notification will be

provided to all participants of the Plan who are present in the work

environment of Unaka or its affiliates, within fifteen (15) calendar

days of the date of publication of the Notice of Proposed Exemption

(the Notice) in the Federal Register by posting on employee bulletin

boards at those locations within the principal places of employment of

Unaka and its affiliates which are customarily used for notices

regarding labor-management matters for review. Such posting will

contain a copy of the Notice, as it appears in the Federal Register on

the date of publication, plus a copy of the supplemental statement (the

Supplemental Statement), as required, pursuant to 29 C.F.R.

Sec. 2570.43(b)(2), which will advise such interested persons of their

right to comment and to request a hearing.

It is represented that notification will be provided to any

interested person who is entitled to benefits but who is not present in

the work environment of Unaka or its affiliates by mailing first class

within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of publication of the

Notice, a copy of the Notice, as it appears in the Federal Register on

the date of publication, plus a copy of the Supplemental Statement, as

required, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. Sec. 2570.43(b)(2), which will advise

such interested persons of their right to comment and to request a

hearing.

All written comments and requests for a hearing must be received by

the Department no later than thirty (30) days from the date such

interested persons receive, through posting or mailing, a copy of the

Notice and the Supplemental Statement.

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelena C. Le Blanc of the Department,

telephone (202) 219-8883 (This is not a toll-free number.)

General Motors Hourly Rate Employes Pension Plan, General Motors

Retirement Program for Salaried Employes, Saturn Individual

Retirement Plan for Represented Team Members, Saturn Personal

Choices Retirement Plan for Non-Represented Team Members,

Employees' Retirement Plan for GMAC Mortgage Corporation

(collectively, the Plans), Located in New York, New York

[Application Nos. D-10473 through D-10476]

Proposed Exemption

The Department is considering granting an exemption under the

authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the

Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part

2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).

Part I--Covered Transactions

If the proposed exemption is granted, the restrictions of section

406(a)(1)(A) through (D) of the Act and the taxes imposed by section

4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through

(D) of the Code, shall not apply effective December 11, 1998, to a

transaction between AEW Industrial, L.L.C. (the LLC), an entity which

currently holds ``plan assets'' of the Plans, or any subsidiary of the

LLC (as defined in Part IV(d) below) which may hold ``plan assets'' of

the Plans in the future, as a result of investments made by the Plans

in the LLC or any subsidiary through the First Plaza Group Trust (the

Trust), and a party in interest with respect to any of the Plans,

provided that the Specific Conditions set forth below in Part II and

the General Conditions set forth in Part III are met:

Part II--Specific Conditions

(a) In the case of a transaction by the LLC that involves the

acquisition, financing, or disposition of any real property asset, the

terms of the transaction are negotiated on behalf of the Plan by AEW

Capital Management, L.P. or a successor thereto (AEW), under the

authority and general direction of General Motors Investment Management

Corporation (GMIMCo), a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Motors

Corporation (GM), and GMIMCo makes the decision on behalf of the Plan

to enter into the transaction.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a transaction involving an amount of

$5 million or more, which has been negotiated on behalf of the Plans by

AEW and approved by GMIMCo in the manner described above, will not fail

to meet the requirements of this Part II(a) solely because GM or its

designee

[[Page 29915]]

retains the right to veto or approve such transaction;

(b) In the case of any transaction by the LLC that does not involve

acquisitions, financings or dispositions of real property assets, the

terms of the transaction are negotiated on behalf of the Plans by AEW,

under the authority and general direction of GMIMCo, and either AEW or

a property manager acting in accordance with written guidelines or

business plans (including budgets), adopted with the approval of

GMIMCo, makes the decision on behalf of the Plans to enter into the

transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a transaction involving an

amount of $5 million or more, which has been negotiated on behalf of

the Plans in accordance with the foregoing, will not fail to meet the

requirements of this Part II(b) solely because GM or its designee

retains the right to veto or approve such transaction;

(c) The transaction is not described in--

(1) Prohibited Transaction Exemption 81-6 (46 FR 7527, January 23,

1981), relating to securities lending arrangements,

(2) Prohibited Transaction Exemption 83-1 (48 FR 895, January 7,

1983), relating to acquisitions by plans of interests in mortgage

pools, or

(3) Prohibited Transaction Exemption 88-59 (53 FR 24811; June 30,

1988), relating to certain mortgage financing arrangements;

(d) The transaction is not part of an agreement, arrangement or

understanding designed to benefit a party in interest with respect to

any of the Plans;

(e) At the time the transaction is entered into, and at the time of

any subsequent renewal or modification thereof that requires the

consent of GMIMCo, GM, or AEW the terms of the transaction are at least

as favorable to the Plans as the terms generally available in arm's-

length transactions between unrelated parties;

(f) The party in interest dealing with the LLC: (1) is a party in

interest with respect to a Plan (including a fiduciary) solely by

reason of providing services to the Plan, or solely by reason of a

relationship to a service provider described in section 3(14)(F), (G),

(H) or (I) of the Act; and (2) does not have discretionary authority or

control with respect to the investment of the Plan's assets in the

Trust or the LLC, and does not render investment advice, within the

meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3-21(c), with respect to the investment of those

assets in the Trust or the LLC;

(g) The party in interest dealing with the LLC is neither GMIMCo or

AEW nor a person ``related'' to GMIMCo or AEW within the meaning of

Part IV(c) below;

(h) GMIMCo adopts written policies and procedures that are designed

to assure compliance with the conditions of this proposed exemption;

and

(i) An independent auditor, who has appropriate technical training

or experience and proficiency with the fiduciary responsibility

provisions of the Act, and who so represents in writing, conducts an

exemption audit, as defined in Part IV(f) below, on an annual basis.

Following completion of the exemption audit, the auditor issues a

written report to each Plan representing its specific findings

regarding the level of compliance with the policies and procedure

adopted by GMIMCo in accordance with Part II(h) above.

Part III--General Conditions

(a) At all times during the term of this exemption (if granted),

GMIMCo shall be--

(1) A direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of GM, and

(2) An investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers

Act of 1940 that, as of the last day of its most recent fiscal year,

has under its management and control total assets attributable to Plans

maintained by GM or its affiliates (as defined in Part IV(a) of this

exemption) in excess of $50 million. In addition, Plans maintained by

affiliates of GMIMCo must have, as of the last day of each plan's

reporting year, aggregate assets of at least $250 million;

(b) AEW or any successor, as investment manager for assets held by

the LLC, meets the conditions for a ``qualified professional asset

manager'' (QPAM) as set forth in section V(a) of Prohibited Transaction

Class Exemption 84-14 (49 FR 9494, March 13, 1984);

(c) AEW and GMIMCo, or their affiliates, shall maintain, for a

period of six years from the date of each transaction described above,

the records necessary to enable the persons described below in part

III(d)(1) to determine whether the conditions of this exemption (if

granted) have been met, except that (1) a prohibited transaction will

not be deemed to have occurred if, due to circumstances beyond the

control of AEW or GMIMCo, or their affiliates, the records are lost or

destroyed prior to the end of the six-year period, and (2) no party in

interest, other than AEW or GMIMCo, shall be subject to the civil

penalty which may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act or to the

taxes imposed by sections 4975 (a) and (b) of the Code, if the records

are not available for examination as required by section (d) below; and

(d)(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section (d),

and notwithstanding any provisions of subsection (a)(2) and (b) of

section 504 of the Act, the records referred to in section (c) of this

Part III shall be made unconditionally available by GMIMCo or AEW, at

the customary location for the maintenance and/or retention of such

records, for examination during normal business hours by:

(A) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the

Department of Labor or the Internal Revenue Service;

(B) The persons described in Part II(i) of this exemption (relating

to an independent audit of covered transactions as discussed therein);

and

(C) Any fiduciary of the Plans or the Trust;

(2) None of the persons described in subsections (1)(B) and (C) of

this section (d) shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of AEW or

GMIMCo, or commercial or financial information which is privileged or

confidential in nature.

Part IV--Definitions

For purposes of this proposed exemption:

(a) ``Affiliate'' of GM means a member of either (1) a controlled

group of corporations (as defined in section 414(b) of the Code) of

which GM is a member, or (2) a group of trades or businesses under

common control (as defined in section 414(c) of the Code) of which GM

is a member; provided that ``50 percent'' shall be substituted for ``80

percent'' wherever ``80 percent'' appears in Code section 414(b) or

414(c) or the regulations thereunder.

(b) ``Party in interest'' means a person described in section 3(14)

of the Act and includes a ``disqualified person'' as defined in section

4975(e)(2) of the Code.

(c) GMIMCo or AEW are ``related'' to a party in interest with

respect to a Plan for purposes of this proposed exemption if the party

in interest (or a person controlling or controlled by the party in

interest) owns a five percent (5%) or more interest in GMIMCo or AEW,

or if GMIMCo or AEW (or a person controlling or controlled by GMIMCo or

AEW) owns a five percent (5%) or more interest in the party in

interest. For purposes of this definition:

(1) ``Interest'' means with respect to ownership of an entity:

(A) The combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to

vote, or the total value of the shares of all classes of stock of the

entity, if the entity is a corporation;

[[Page 29916]]

(B) The capital interest, or the profits interest of the entity, if

the entity is a partnership; or

(C) The beneficial interest of the entity, if the entity is a trust

or unincorporated enterprise;

(2) A person is considered to own an interest held in any capacity

if the person has or shares the authority--

(A) To exercise any voting rights or to direct some other person to

exercise the voting rights relating to such interest, or

(B) To dispose or to direct the disposition of such interest; and

(3) ``Control'' means the power to exercise a controlling influence

over the management or policies of a person other than an individual.

(d) ``Subsidiary'' means any limited liability company or other

entity organized by the LLC, through which it acquires and holds title

to its real property investments.

(e) An ``exemption audit'' of each Plan's in

This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.