Notice of Public Information Collections being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission
Federal RegisterMay 5, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information Collections being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission
April 27, 1999.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commissions, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control
number. Comments are requested concerning (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before July 6, 1999.
If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice,
you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Les Smith, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A804, Washington, DC 20554 or
via the Internet to [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies
of the information collections contact Les Smith at (202) 418-0217 or
via the Internet at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0716.
Title: Proposed Section 73.1630 Blanketing Interference.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of currently approved collection.
Respondents: Individual or households; Business of other for-profit
entities; Not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 21,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 to 2 hours.
Frequency of response: On occasion reporting requirements.
Total Annual Burden: 41,000 hours
Total Annual Cost: None.
Needs and Uses: This rulemaking proceeding proposed to provide
detailed clarification of the AM, FM, and TV licensee's
responsibilities in resolving/eliminating blanketing interference
caused by their individual stations. Under the current rules (section
73.88 (AM), section 73.318 (FM), section 73.685(d) (TV)), the licensee
is financially responsible for resolving complaints of interference
within one year of program test authority when certain conditions are
met. After the first year, a licensee is only required to provide
technical assistance in determining the cause of the interference. In
this NPRM, we proposed to consolidate all blanketing interference rules
under a new section 73.1630, Blanketing Interference. This new rule was
designed to facilitate the resolution of broadcast interference
problems and set forth all responsibilities of the licensee/permittee
of a broadcast station.
For one year after the broadcast station commences program tests,
the licensee is financially responsible for resolving blanketing
interference complaints. After the first year, the licensee is
obligated to provide technical assistance to resolve complaints of
blanketing interference. The information provided to complainants will
be used to facilitate the resolution of complaints of blanketing
interference.
Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 99-11209 Filed 5-4-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.