Textile and Apparel Categories With the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States; Changes to the 1998 Correlation
Federal RegisterApr 13, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS
Textile and Apparel Categories With the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States; Changes to the 1998 Correlation
April 7, 1998.
AGENCY: Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA).
ACTION: Changes to the 1998 Correlation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori E. Mennitt, International Trade
Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of
Commerce, (202) 482-3400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Correlation: Textile and Apparel Categories based on the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (1998) presents the
harmonized tariff numbers under each of the cotton, wool, man-made
fiber, silk blend and other vegetable fiber categories used by the
United States in monitoring imports of these textile products and in
the administration of the textile program. The Correlation should be
amended to include the changes indicated below. These changes were
effective on April 1, 1998:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes to the 1998 Correlation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
These numbers were renumbered due to the creation of the statistical
breakouts for cooler bags in chapter 63. The categories and definitions
remain the same:
4209.92.6090 (369) becomes 4209.92.6091 (369).
4209.92.9025 (670) becomes 4209.92.9026 (670).
4209.92.9035 (870) becomes 4209.92.9036 (870)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troy H. Cribb,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 98-9630 Filed 4-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-F
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.