Special Local Regulations: Empire State Regatta, Albany, NY
Federal RegisterJan 4, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD01-98-162]
RIN 2115-AE46
Special Local Regulations: Empire State Regatta, Albany, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to revise the Special Local
Regulations for the Empire State Regatta. This action is necessary to
update the course location and effective period for this annual event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the
Hudson River.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 5, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to the Waterways Oversight Branch
(CGD01-98-162), Coast Guard Activities New York, 212 Coast Guard Drive,
Staten Island, New York 10305, or deliver them to room 205 at the same
address between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
The Waterways Oversight Branch of Coast Guard Activities New York
maintains the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments, and
documents as indicated in this preamble, will become part of this
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room 205,
Coast Guard Activities New York, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant J. Lopez, Waterways Oversight Branch, Coast Guard Activities
New York (718) 354-4193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
The Coast Guard encourages interested persons to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written data, views, or arguments.
Persons submitting comments should include their names and addresses,
identify this rulemaking (CGD01-98-162) and the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for
each comment. Please submit two copies of all comments and attachments
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. Persons wanting acknowledgment of
receipt of comments should enclose stamped, self-addressed postcards or
envelopes.
The Coast Guard will consider all comments received during the
comment period. It may change this proposed rule in view of the
comments.
The Coast Guard plans no public hearing. Persons may request a
public hearing by writing to the Waterways Oversight Branch at the
address under ADDRESSES. The request should include the reasons why a
hearing would be beneficial. If it determines that the opportunity for
oral presentations will aid this rulemaking, the Coast Guard will hold
a public hearing at a time and place announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Albany Rowing Center sponsors this annual crewing race with
approximately 300 rowers competing in this event. The sponsor expects
no spectator craft for this event. The race will take place on the
Hudson River in the vicinity of Albany, New York. The sponsor held the
race in a new location in 1998 and is planning on holding the event in
this new location in the future. This proposed new course provides
better viewing for spectators on shore, and it is also easier for the
sponsor to set up. The proposed regulated area encompasses all waters
of the Hudson River from the Albany Rensselaer Swing Bridge, river mile
146.2, to Light 224 (LLNR 39015), river mile 147.5, located
approximately 75 yards north of the I-90/Patroon Island Bridge. The new
race course is 800 yards smaller than the current course.
The proposed effective period (Sec. 100.104(b)) states the event
will be held on the first weekend of June. The current effective period
states the event will be held on the first or second weekend of June.
This proposed rule reduces uncertainty the current regulation causes
regarding the date of the event. The special local regulations
(Sec. 100.104(c)) remains unchanged.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed Special Local Regulation is for the Empire State
Regatta held on the Hudson River in the vicinity of Albany, New York.
The Special Local Regulations for this event are located at 33 CFR
Sec. 100.104. The sponsor held this event further north in 1998 from
the area published in Sec. 100.104 and is planning on holding the event
in this new location in the future. This event will be held on the
first weekend of June. The current regulation states the event will be
held on the first or second weekend of June. This rule is proposed to
change the course location and the event date published in
Sec. 100.104, provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
the event, and to give the marine community the opportunity to comment
on the regulated area.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. It has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget under that Order. It is not significant under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44
FR 11040; February 26, 1979).
The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this proposed rule
to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e
of the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary.
Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a portion of
the Hudson River during the race, the effect of this regulation will
not be significant for several reasons: this is an annual marine event
currently published in 33 CFR Sec. 100.104, the limited amount of
commercial traffic in this area of the
[[Page 67]]
river, commercial vessels can plan their transits up the river around
the time the regulated area is in effect as they will have advance
notice of the event, it is an annual event with local support, the new
course is 800 yards smaller than the current course, the event's course
has only been moved 1600 yards north of the current regulated area,
vessel traffic will still be able to transit the regulated area in
accordance with 33 CFR Sec. 100.104(c), and advance notifications will
be made to the local maritime community by the Local Notice to Mariners
and marine information broadcasts.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Sec. 601 et seq.),
the Coast Guard considers whether this proposed rule, if adopted, will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. ``Small entities'' include small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
For the reasons stated in the Regulatory Evaluation section above,
the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 605(b) that this proposed
rule, if adopted, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If, however, you think that your
business or organization qualifies as a small entity and that this
proposed rule will have a significant economic impact on your business
or organization, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why
you think it qualifies and in what way and to what degree this proposed
rule will economically affect it.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule does not provide for a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Sec. 3501 et
seq.).
Federalism
The Coast Guard has analyzed this proposed rule under the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and has
determined that this proposed rule does not have sufficient
implications for federalism to warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Unfunded Mandates
Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), the
Coast Guard must consider whether this rule will result in an annual
expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate
of $100 million (adjusted annually for inflation). If so, the Act
requires that a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives be
considered, and that from those alternatives, the least costly, most
cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative that achieves the
objective of the rule be selected. No state, local, or tribal
government entities will be effected by this rule, so this rule will
not result in annual or aggregate costs of $100 million or more.
Therefore, the Coast Guard is exempt from any further regulatory
requirements under the Unfunded Mandates Act.
Environment
The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this
proposed rule and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g), of
Commandant Instruction M16475.1C, this proposed rule is categorically
excluded from further environmental documentation. A ``Categorical
Exclusion Determination'' is available in the docket for inspection or
copying where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
Proposed Regulation
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233 through 1236; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR
100.35.
2. Revise Sec. 100.104 (a) and (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 100.104 Empire State Regatta, Albany, New York
(a) Regulated area. All waters of the Hudson River between the
Albany Rensselaer Swing Bridge, river mile 146.2, and Light 224, (LLNR
39015), river mile 147.5, located approximately 750 yards north of the
I-90/Patroon Island Bridge.
(b) Effective period. This section is effective annually from 12
p.m. Friday through 7 p.m. Sunday, on the first weekend of June.
* * * * *
Dated: December 18, 1998.
R.M. Larrabee,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 98-34764 Filed 12-31-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.