AgrEvo USA Co.; Receipt of Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Sugar Beet Genetically Engineered for Glufosinate Herbicide Tolerance

Federal RegisterFeb 6, 1998

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. 97-130-1]

AgrEvo USA Co.; Receipt of Petition for Determination of

Nonregulated Status for Sugar Beet Genetically Engineered for

Glufosinate Herbicide Tolerance

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health

Inspection Service has received a petition from AgrEvo USA Company

seeking a determination of nonregulated status for sugar beet

designated as Transformation Event T120-7, which has been genetically

engineered for tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate. The petition has

been submitted in accordance with our regulations concerning the

introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms and products.

In accordance with those regulations, we are soliciting public comments

on whether this sugar beet presents a plant pest risk.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 7, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Please send an original and three copies of your comments to

Docket No. 97-130-1, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS,

Suite 3C03, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please

state that your comments refer to Docket No. 97-130-1. A copy of the

petition and any comments received may be inspected at USDA, room 1141,

South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,

DC, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except

holidays. Persons wishing access to that room to inspect the petition

or comments are asked to call in advance of visiting at (202) 690-2817

to facilitate entry into the reading room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ved Malik, Biotechnology and

Biological Analysis, PPQ, APHIS, Suite 5B05, 4700 River Road Unit 147,

Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-7612. To obtain a copy of the

petition, contact Ms. Kay Peterson at (301) 734-4885; e-mail:

[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The regulations in 7 CFR part 340,

``Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced Through

Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason to

Believe Are Plant Pests,'' regulate, among other things, the

introduction (importation, interstate movement, or release into the

environment) of organisms and products altered or produced through

genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there is reason to

believe are plant pests. Such genetically engineered organisms and

products are considered ``regulated articles.''

The regulations in Sec. 340.6(a) provide that any person may submit

a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)

seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated under 7

CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec. 340.6 describe the form

that a petition for determination of nonregulated status must take and

the information that must be included in the petition.

On December 2, 1997, APHIS received a petition (APHIS Petition No.

97-336-01p) from AgrEvo USA Company (AgrEvo) of Wilmington, DE,

requesting a determination of nonregulated status under 7 CFR part 340

for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) designated as Transformation Event

T120-7 (event T120-7), which has been genetically engineered for

tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate. The AgrEvo petition states that

the subject sugar beet should not be regulated by APHIS because it does

not present a plant pest risk.

As described in the petition, event T120-7 sugar beet has been

genetically engineered to contain a synthetic version of the pat gene

derived from Streptomyces viridochromogenes. The pat gene encodes the

enzyme phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT), which confers

tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate. Expression of the pat gene is

controlled by 35S promoter and terminator sequences derived from the

plant pathogen cauliflower mosaic virus. Event T120-7 sugar beet also

contains the aph(3')II or nptII marker gene used in plant

transformation. Expression of the nptII gene is controlled by gene

sequences derived from the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens,

and analysis indicates that the NPTII protein is expressed in certain

parts of the subject plants. The A. tumefaciens method was used to

transfer the added genes into the parental sugar beet line.

Event T120-7 sugar beet has been considered a regulated article

under the regulations in 7 CFR part 340 because it contains gene

sequences from plant pathogens. The subject sugar beet has been field

tested in the U.S. since 1994 under APHIS permits. In the process of

reviewing the permit applications for field trials of this sugar beet,

APHIS determined that the vectors and other elements were disarmed and

that the trials, which were conducted under conditions of reproductive

and physical containment or isolation, would not present a risk of

plant pest introduction or dissemination.

In the Federal Plant Pest Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 150aa et seq.),

``plant pest'' is defined as ``any living stage of: Any insects, mites,

nematodes, slugs, snails, protozoa, or other invertebrate animals,

bacteria, fungi, other parasitic plants or reproductive parts thereof,

viruses, or any organisms similar to or allied with any of the

foregoing, or any infectious substances, which can directly or

indirectly injure or cause disease or damage in any plants or parts

thereof, or any processed, manufactured or other products of plants.''

APHIS views this definition very broadly. The definition covers direct

or indirect injury, disease, or damage not just to agricultural crops,

but also to plants in general, for example, native species, as well as

to organisms that may be beneficial to plants, for example, honeybees,

rhizobia, etc.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for

the regulation of pesticides under the

[[Page 6149]]

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended

(7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.). FIFRA requires that all pesticides, including

herbicides, be registered prior to distribution or sale, unless exempt

by EPA regulation. In cases in which genetically modified plants allow

for a new use of an herbicide or involve a different use pattern for

the herbicide, EPA must approve the new or different use. Accordingly,

a submission has been made to EPA for registration of the herbicide

glufosinate for use on sugar beet. When the use of the herbicide on the

genetically modified plant would result in an increase in the residues

of the herbicide in a food or feed crop for which the herbicide is

currently registered, or in new residues in a crop for which the

herbicide is not currently registered, establishment of a new tolerance

or a revision of the existing tolerance would be required. Residue

tolerances for pesticides are established by EPA under the Federal

Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended (21 U.S.C. 301 et

seq.), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) enforces tolerances

set by EPA under the FFDCA.

FDA published a statement of policy on foods derived from new plant

varieties in the Federal Register on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22984-23005).

The FDA statement of policy includes a discussion of FDA's authority

for ensuring food safety under the FFDCA, and provides guidance to

industry on the scientific considerations associated with the

development of foods derived from new plant varieties, including those

plants developed through the techniques of genetic engineering. AgrEvo

has begun consultation with FDA on the subject sugar beet.

In accordance with Sec. 340.6(d) of the regulations, we are

publishing this notice to inform the public that APHIS will accept

written comments regarding the Petition for Determination of

Nonregulated Status from any interested person for a period of 60 days

from the date of this notice. The petition and any comments received

are available for public review, and copies of the petition may be

ordered (see the ADDRESSES section of this notice).

After the comment period closes, APHIS will review the data

submitted by the petitioner, all written comments received during the

comment period, and any other relevant information. Based on the

available information, APHIS will furnish a response to the petitioner,

either approving the petition in whole or in part, or denying the

petition. APHIS will then publish a notice in the Federal Register

announcing the regulatory status of AgrEvo's event T120-7 sugar beet

and the availability of APHIS' written decision.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 150aa-150jj, 151-167, and 1622n; 31 U.S.C.

9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(c).

Done in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of February 1998.

Craig A. Reed,

Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

[FR Doc. 98-3048 Filed 2-5-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-34-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.