Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. To Amend PCX Rule 6 Regarding the Exchange's Dress Code

Federal RegisterOct 16, 1998

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-40532; File No. SR-PCX-98-48]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate

Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. To

Amend PCX Rule 6 Regarding the Exchange's Dress Code

October 8, 1998.

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that

on September 23, 1998, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or

``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission

(``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule change as described in

Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by PCX. The

Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the

proposed rule change from interested persons.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

\2\ 17 CFR 204.19b-4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of

Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange is proposing to modify certain rules on Options Floor

conduct, including standards of dress and consumption of food and drink

on the Trading Floor. The rule change also modifies the current

provisions on order tickets that are used on the Floor for options

orders. Proposed new language is italicized; proposed deletions are

bracketed.

* * * * *

para.4733 Admission to and Conduct on the Options Trading Floor

Rule 6.2(a)-(b)--No change.

(c) Standards of Dress and Conduct--No change.

(1) Standards of Dress--No change.

(A) Personal attire must [shall] be neat, clean and presentable.

(B) Men must wear [dress] shirts with collars [and neckties or bow

ties tied in a conventional manner and worn under shirt collars; clip

bow ties must be clipped to both sides of shirt collars. Golf and Aloha

shirts are prohibited for both men and women.]

(C) All persons must wear trading jackets and/or suit or sport

coats while present on the Trading Floor.

(D) The following are examples of violations of Trading Floor dress

code standards:

(i) Blue jeans that are patched, torn, frayed or faded; tie-dyes;

tube tops; overalls; military uniforms or fatigues; sweat suits; or

trousers that are frayed or torn.

(ii) Bare or stocking feet or thongs.

(iii) Clothing drawing excessive attention, including costumes of

any kind, bare midriffs, halter tops, sheer blouses, miniskirts, T-

shirts, hot pants, shorts, or abbreviated clothing of any kind.

(E) [Waiver of the dress code means only that ties and jackets need

not be worn]. The Options Floor Trading Committee may impose additional

standards of dress or otherwise modify these standards of dress by

means of a written policy that will be distributed to Options Floor

Members.

(2) Standards of Conduct.

(A)--No change.

(B) The entry of food or drink may be permitted at the discretion

of the Options Floor Trading Committee. [of any kind to the Floor

during trading hours is prohibited.] Alcoholic beverages may not be

consumed on the Trading Floor at any time [unless this prohibition is

waived by a majority of the Options Trading Floor Committee. If a

quorum of this Committee cannot be

[[Page 55669]]

found, a designated Officer of the Exchange may waive the restriction.]

(C)-(F)--No change.

* * * * *

para.5061 Certain Types of Orders Defined

Rule 6.62(a)-(d)--No change.

(e) Not held order. A not held order is an order that is marked

``not held,'' [,] ``NH,'' ``take time'' or that [which] bears any

qualifying notation giving discretion as to the price or time at which

such order is to be executed. The ``not held'' designation must appear

in the ``special instructions'' portion of the order ticket. Orders

that merely include a ``not held'' designation as part of the time

stamp will not be deemed to be ``not held'' orders.

(f)(-(j)--No change.

* * * * *

para.5103 Reporting Duties

Rule 6.69(a)-(d)--No change.

Commentary:

.01-.03--No change.

.04 Time stamping on the back of the hard card does not meet the

Exchange's time stamp requirements because the hard card is not

submitted to the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, PCX included statements

concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and

discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The

text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in

Item IV below. PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections, A, B

and C below, of the most significant aspect of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

Purpose

The PCX is proposing to change the standards of dress on the

trading floor (currently set forth in Rule 6.2(c)). The current rule

states that men must wear dress shirts with collars and neckties or bow

ties tied in a conventional manner and worn under shirt collars; and

that clip bow ties must be clipped to both sides of shirt collars. The

current rule also states that golf and Aloha shirts are prohibited for

both men and women. the rule change eliminates those provisions and

replaces them with the requirement that men must wear shirts with

collars. The rule change would also adopt a provision stating that the

Options Floor Trading Committee (``OFTC'') may impose additional

standards of dress or otherwise modify the current standards of dress

by means of a written policy that will be distributed to Options Floor

Members.

PCX is also proposing to modify the rules on food or drink

permitted on the Trading Floor pursuant to Rule 6.2(c)(2)(B). The

current rule prohibits food or drink on the Floor during trading hours

and prohibits alcoholic beverages at any time unless this prohibition

is waived by a majority of the OFTC. The Exchange proposes to change

the rule so that it would state that food or drink may be permitted on

the Trading Floor at the discretion of the OFTC and by prohibiting the

consumption of alcoholic beverages on the Trading Floor at any time.

In addition, PCX is proposing to adopt additional requirements on

``not held'' orders. The current Rule 6.62(e) defines a ``not held''

order as an order marked ``not held'', ``take time'' or which bears any

qualifying notation giving discretion as to price or time at which such

order is to be executed.\3\ The proposed rule change would require that

the appropriate designation, ``not held'' or ``take time,'' must appear

in the ``special instructions'' portion of the order ticket. The rule

change also provides that orders that include a ``not held''

designation as part of the time stamp will not be deemed to be ``not

held'' orders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ See PCX Rule 6.62(e).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the PCX is proposing to adopt a new Rule 6.69.04

specifying that time stamping on the back of the hard card does not

meet the Exchange's time stamp requirements. This change is based on

the fact that the hard card is not routinely submitted to the Exchange.

Basis

The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section

6(b) \4\ of the Act, in general, and Section 6(b)(5),\5\ in particular,

in that is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,

to facilitate transactions in securities, and, in general, to protect

investors and the public interest.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).

\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will

impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate

in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed

Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited

nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing

for Commission Action

The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section

19(b)(3) \6\ of the Act and paragraph (e)(3) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder

\7\ because it is concerned solely with the administration of the

Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed

rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if

it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or

appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or

otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3).

\7\ 17 C.F.R. 240.19b-4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and

arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is

consistent with the Act.\8\ Persons making written submissions should

file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange

Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the

submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with

respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission,

and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change

between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be

withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.

552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's

Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549.

Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying

at the principal office of PCX. All submissions should refer to File

No. SR-PCX-98-48 and should be submitted by November 6, 1998.

\8\ In reviewing this proposal, the commission has considered

its potential impact on efficiency, competition and capital

formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 55670]]

For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,

pursuant to delegated authority.\9\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98-27824 Filed 10-15-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.