Proposed Changes to Section 4 of the Iowa State Technical Guide
Federal RegisterOct 14, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Proposed Changes to Section 4 of the Iowa State Technical Guide
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department
of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Iowa NRCS
State Technical Guide for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for
Iowa that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide
specifically in practice standards #327, Conservation Cover; #330,
Contour Farming; #332, Contour Buffer Strips; #412, Grassed Waterway;
#585, Stripcropping, Contour; and #638, Water and Sediment Control
Basin, to account for improved technology. This practice can be used in
systems that treat highly erodible land.
DATES: Comments will be reviewed on or before November 13, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leroy Brown, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Federal Building, 210 Walnut Street, Suite 693, Des Moines,
Iowa 50309; at 515/284-4260; fax 515/284-4394.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS
will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that
period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition
of those comments and a final determination of change will be made.
Dennis J. Pate,
Acting State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 98-27516 Filed 10-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.