Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Extension of Public Comment Period for Take Guidance and Survey Protocol for the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-owl

Federal RegisterSep 16, 1998

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Extension of

Public Comment Period for Take Guidance and Survey Protocol for the

Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-owl

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Extension on two public comment periods.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) provides notice

that the public comment period is extended until November 14, 1998 for

take guidance and survey protocol for the cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl.

DATES: Written comments should be received by November 14, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review either the cactus ferruginous

pygmy-owl take guidance or survey protocol may access either at the

world wide web site of the Southwest Region of the Service at http://

ifw2es.fws.gov/arizona/, or obtain copies by contacting the U.S. Fish

and Wildlife Service, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office, 2321 W.

Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 or by calling

the Field Office at (602) 640-2720. Documents will also be available

for public inspection by written request, by appointment only, during

normal business hours (7:30 to 4:30), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,

Phoenix, Arizona. Written data or comments concerning the cactus

ferruginous pygmy-owl take guidance or survey protocol should be

submitted to the Field Supervisor, Arizona Ecological Services Field

Office, Phoenix, Arizona (see address above).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Gatz, Acting Field Supervisor,

Arizona Ecological Services Field Office in Phoenix, Arizona at (602)

640-2720.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl was listed by the Service as an

endangered species in Arizona on March 10, 1997 (62 FR 10730), based on

extensive population declines within its historic range in the state.

The pygmy-owl, a small reddish-brown owl, nests in a cavity in a tree

or large columnar cactus. The species was once common to abundant in

riparian forests, mesquite-cottonwood woodlands, and desertscrub

habitats in central and southern portions of the state. It is still

considered a potential inhabitant of riparian areas, where this

extremely limited vegetative community still occurs, and is found in

upper Sonoran Desert habitats usually consisting of dense ironwood,

mesquite, acacia, bursage, and saguaro cacti, with understory

vegetation of smaller trees and shrubs.

On August 13, 1998 (63 FR 43362 and 43363) the service published

notices of availability and opening of public comment period for survey

protocol and taking guidance.

Take Guidance

Urban and suburban development within the remaining appropriate

habitat of the pygmy-owl is ongoing. These and other actions may result

in take of the species. The Endangered Species Act and implementing

regulations found at 50 CFR 17.21 and 17.31 set forth a series of

general prohibitions that apply to all endangered and threatened

wildlife, respectively. These prohibitions, in part, make it illegal

for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to take

(includes harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, or

collect or to attempt any of these). Regulations at 50 CFR 17.3 define

the terms ``harm'' and ``harass'' as used under the definition of

``take.'' ``Harm'' is defined as an act which actually kills or injures

wildlife. Such acts may include significant habitat modification that

impairs essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or

sheltering. ``Harass'' is defined as an intentional or negligent act or

omission which creates a likelihood of injury to wildlife by annoying

it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavior

patterns, including, but not limited to, breeding, feeding, or

sheltering.

Permits may be issued to carry out otherwise prohibited activities

involving endangered and threatened wildlife species under certain

circumstances. Such permits are available for scientific purposes, to

enhance the propagation or survival of the species, and/or for

incidental take in connection with otherwise lawful activities.

At the time of listing the owl, the Service provided a partial

listing of activities that could potentially harm, harass, or otherwise

take the pygmy-owl. These included--

(1) Removal of nest trees;

(2) Removal of a nest box in use by the pygmy-owl;

(3) Clearing or significant modification of occupied habitat,

whether or not the nest tree is included;

(4) Sustained noise disturbance during the breeding season;

(5) Pursuit or harassment of individual birds;

(6) Frequent or lengthy low-level flights over occupied habitat

during the breeding season;

(7) Severe overgrazing that results in the removal of understory

vegetation.

In furtherance of the Service's policy to provide information

concerning what activities may be considered take of the pygmy-owl, the

Service is making available information to aid both Federal and non-

Federal entities in determining when a take situation may occur.

Survey Protocol

The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), in cooperation with the

Arizona Game and Fish Department (Department), propose a survey

protocol for determining the presence of the endangered cactus

ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum) within known

historic range of the species in Arizona. The proposed survey protocol

comes in two versions depending on its use: the first is for use in

determining if cactus ferruginous pygmy-owls are present on specific

project sites where an activity is proposed; the second is for use in

gathering information on distribution, occurrence, and numbers of

pygmy-owls over more extensive areas of its historic range in Arizona.

This proposed protocol is founded on procedures established by the

Arizona Game and Fish Department in 1993. The proposed protocol

incorporates modifications found to be appropriate following 5 years of

field application. Differences between the 1993 protocol and the

current proposed protocol include a reduction in the survey period from

9 months (September through May) to 6 months (January through June);

and an increase in surveys from one to three, with 30 days between each

of the three surveys preferred, but a minimum of 15 days required. At

least one survey must occur between February 15 and April 15. In

reviewing determinations of pygmy owl presence or absence, the Service

will require the implementation of the protocol for two consecutive

years (rather than one year) prior to actions that may impact the owls

or their habitats.

The existing protocol will remain in use (i.e., surveys from

September through December this year will still be accepted through

December 31, 1998). Use of the currently proposed protocol will be

required from January 1, 1999, forward.

[[Page 49540]]

The Service and Department have submitted the protocol to

recognized species and technical experts for peer review to ensure a

scientifically sound basis for determination of the presence of the

species within its known range.

The Service and the Department will regularly review and modify, as

necessary, the survey protocol to ensure that the best available

scientific information is incorporated into the prescribed methodology.

Overall Purpose

The Service is extending the public comment period to ensure that

adequate time is available for the public to provide additional

information to more adequately understand the occurrence and biology of

the cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl in central and southern Arizona. Until

more complete scientific information is available, the Service believes

that the use of the take guidance document and the proposed survey

protocol document will protect the pygmy-owl while allowing carefully

considered development to proceed and will provide the most

biologically valid data upon which to determine habitat use and

occupancy by the pygmy-owl.

Author

The primary author of this document is Tom Gatz, Acting Field

Supervisor, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office (see ADDRESSES

section).

Authority

The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act (16

U.S.C. 1532 et seq.).

Dated: September 8, 1998.

Nancy M. Kaufman,

Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

[FR Doc. 98-24776 Filed 9-14-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.