Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Rule To Determine Endangered or Threatened Status for Six Plants From the Mountains of Southern California

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

RIN 1018-AD34

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Rule To

Determine Endangered or Threatened Status for Six Plants From the

Mountains of Southern California

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) determines endangered

status

[[Page 49007]]

pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), for

two plants, Poa atropurpurea (San Bernardino bluegrass) and Taraxacum

californicum (California taraxacum), and determines threatened status

for four plants, Arenaria ursina (Bear Valley sandwort), Castilleja

cinerea (ash-gray Indian paintbrush), Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum (southern mountain wild buckwheat), and Trichostema

austromontanum ssp. compactum (Hidden Lake bluecurls). These six plant

taxa are found in the San Bernardino, San Jacinto, Laguna, and Palomar

mountains of southern California. They are imperiled by one or more of

the following factors--destruction and degradation of habitat by

urbanization, off-road vehicle (ORV) use, trampling, recreational

development, domestic animal grazing, livestock grazing, alteration of

the hydrological regimes, competition from introduced plants, over

collection, and hybridization (genetic absorption) by alien species.

This rule implements the Federal protection and recovery provisions

afforded by the Act for these six plants. A notice of withdrawal of the

proposal to list Arabis johnstonii (Johnston's rock-cress), which was

proposed for listing along with the six plant taxa considered in this

rule, is being published in the Federal Register concurrently with this

final rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective October 14, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The complete file for this rule is available for inspection,

by appointment, during normal business hours at the U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Field Office, 2730 Loker Avenue West,

Carlsbad, California 92008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary D. Wallace, Ph.D., Botanist, U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service (see ADDRESSES section above or telephone

760/431-9440; facsimile 760/431-9624).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum are low perennial plants that predominantly occur on

pebble plain habitat within a 240 square kilometer (sq km) (92 square

mile (sq mi)) area in the San Bernardino Mountains of San Bernardino

County, California (Derby and Wilson 1978, Derby 1979, Krantz 1981a,

Neel and Barrows 1990). Pebble plains are characteristically treeless

openings within the surrounding montane pinyon-juniper woodland or

coniferous forest, located at elevations between 1,800 and 2,300 meters

(m) (6,000 and 7,500 feet (ft)). Pebble plains are remnants of a

Pleistocene lake bed, which are level to sloping plains with clay soils

covered with quartzite pebbles (Derby 1979, Krantz 1983). Frost heaving

and alternating wet and dry cycles force associated saragosa quartzite

pebbles to the soil surface to create the characteristic appearance of

the pebble plains (Neel and Barrows 1990). These soils have an

extremely slow infiltration rate and, thus, have a high runoff

potential (Neel and Barrows 1990). Pebble plains are the result of a

combination of soil and climatic factors that support a unique

assemblage of plant species, some of which are endemic while others

represent disjunct occurrences of species more common elsewhere. Neel

and Barrows (1990) noted that pebble plains often are associated with

meadow habitats in the Big Bear Lake area. Natural meadows and pebble

plains provide habitat for several sensitive taxa (Krantz 1981b).

The pebble plain taxa included in this final rule are predominantly

restricted to pebble plain habitat. Each of these taxa has a mosaic

distribution among the various pebble plain complexes and within a

given complex. All nine pebble plain complexes (except Coxey Meadow)

noted by Neel and Barrows, 1990, support two or more of the pebble

plain taxa included in this rule. Coxey Meadow is more isolated and not

as well known as the other pebble plain sites, but supports other

elements of the known pebble plain flora (e.g. Arabis parishii and

Ivesia argyrocoma).

Damage or curtailment of any pebble plain habitat will threaten the

continued existence and recovery of Arenaria ursina, Castilleja

cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, as well as other

associated pebble plain flora. Coxey Meadow may represent a historical

occurrence or ecologically marginal pebble plain.

Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum are found in meadow

habitats in the Big Bear Valley in the San Bernardino Mountains. The

former species also is found in seven meadow areas in San Diego County.

There were 38 hectares (ha) (93 acres (ac)) of P. atropurpurea meadow

habitat in the Big Bear area in 1981 (Krantz 1981b). Trichostema

austromontanum ssp. compactum is found about the margins of a single

vernal pool in the San Jacinto Mountains at 2,650 m (8,600 ft).

Discussion of the Six Plant Taxa

Arenaria ursina

Arenaria ursina, a member of the pink family (Caryophyllaceae), was

described by Benjamin L. Robinson (1894) on the basis of a collection

made in 1882 by Samuel B. Parish at Bear Valley in the San Bernardino

Mountains, California. This taxon was reduced to a variety of A.

capillaris by Robinson (1897) but Maguire (1951) and subsequent authors

(Munz and Keck 1959, Munz 1974, Hartman 1993) treat it as a species.

Arenaria ursina is a low, tufted, perennial herb with stems from 6 to

15 centimeters (cm) (2 to 6 inches (in)) long. The leaves are opposite,

4 to12 millimeters (mm) (0.16 to 0.5 in) long. The white, five-parted

flowers are arranged in open cymes (clusters) 4 to 15 cm (1.5 to 6 in)

high. The petals are 4 to 5 mm (0.16 to 0.2 in) long, the sepals are up

to 4 mm (0.16 in) long in fruit. This species flowers from May to

August. Arenaria ursina is distinguished from other members of the

genus within its range by its glabrous (hairless), filiform (thread-

like), nerveless leaves less than 2 mm (0.08 in) wide and its rounded,

3 to 4 mm (0.12 to 0.16 in) long sepals (Hartman 1993).

Arenaria ursina is found on pebble plains and dry slopes in the San

Bernardino Mountains of southwest San Bernardino County. The dry slopes

mentioned here are areas that fit the general description of pebble

plains but do not support both characteristic species Arenaria ursina

and Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum (Neel and Barrows 1990).

Populations of A. ursina are known from eight pebble plain complexes in

the vicinity of Big Bear and Baldwin lakes (Krantz 1981a, Neel and

Barrows 1990, California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) 1997).

Most of the occurrences are on U.S. Forest Service (FS) land at

elevations from 1,800 to 2,900 m (6,000 to 9,500 ft) (Griggs 1979,

Krantz 1981a, Neel and Barrows 1990). Some occur on land owned by the

California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), The Nature Conservancy

(TNC), or private landowners. Arenaria ursina is threatened at six of

the eight sites where it occurs.

Castilleja cinerea

Castilleja cinerea, a member of the figwort family

(Scrophulariaceae), was described by Asa Gray (1884) based on a

collection made in 1882 by S.B. and W.F. Parish at Bear Valley, San

Bernardino Mountains, California. Jepson (1925) included this species

in the genus Orthocarpus as O. cinereus

[[Page 49008]]

(A. Gray) Jepson, although this combination has not been recognized by

any other authorities (Chuang and Heckard 1993). Castilleja cinerea is

a semi-parasitic perennial with several, ascending to decumbent

(trailing), grayish stems sprouting from the root-crown. The stems are

1 to 2 decimeters (dm) (4 to 8 in) tall. The inflorescence (flower

stalk) is greenish yellow (occasionally reddish-orange tinged) with

distinctive yellowish hairs on the lower bracts. The calyx (united

sepals) is nearly equally divided into linear lobes, and the corolla is

yellowish. It flowers primarily in June and July. Castilleja cinerea is

distinguished from other species of Castilleja within its range by its

perennial nature, ashy-puberulent (short hairs) stems and leaves,

yellowish flowers, and calyx lobes of equal length (Chuang and Heckard

1993).

Castilleja cinerea is known from fewer than 20 localities at the

eastern end of the San Bernardino Mountains, (Heckard 1980, Neel and

Barrows 1990). Most populations occur on pebble plains, but C. cinerea

is also found in pine forest habitats near the Snow Valley Ski Area,

along Sugarloaf Ridge, and in the vicinity of Lost Creek. Castilleja

cinerea is known to occur on private lands, CDFG land, and FS land

including that leased for vacation homes and a ski area.

Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum

Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, a member of the buckwheat

family (Polygonaceae), was described by Munz and Johnston (1924) based

on a collection made on July 4, 1920, by R. D. Harwood near the lake at

Big Bear Valley in the San Bernardino Mountains, California. Eriogonum

kennedyi var. austromontanum was treated as a subspecies by Stokes

(1936), Munz and Keck (1959), and Munz (1974). The taxon was treated as

a variety by Reveal and Munz (1968) and Hickman (1993).

Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum is a woody-based perennial

with stems forming loose cushion-like leafy mats 5 to 35 cm (6 to 14

in) wide. The leaves are oblanceolate (with rounded end broader than

the base), 6 to 10 mm (0.2 to 0.4 in) long and densely white hairy. The

inflorescences are 8 to 15 cm (3 to 6 in) high, bearing head-like

flower clusters. The perianth (united calyx and corolla) is white to

rose, and composed of inner and outer lobes that are similar in

appearance. This taxon flowers from July through September. This

variety can be distinguished from E. kennedyi var. kennedyi and E.

kennedyi var. alpigenum, which also occur in the San Bernardino

Mountains, by its long, loosely wooly-haired inflorescences, longer

involucres (whorl of bracts) (2.5 to 4 mm (0.1 to 0.2 in) long), longer

(3.5 to 4 mm (0.2 in)) fruits, and longer leaves (6 to 10 mm (0.2 to

0.4 in)) (Reveal 1989, Hickman 1993). Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum could also be confused with E. wrightii ssp.

subscaposum. However, E. wrightii ssp. subscaposum has racemose flower

stalks, wider (2 to 4 mm (0.1 to 0.2 in)) leaves, shorter (2 to 2.5 mm

(0.1 in)) fruits, and is found in yellow pine forest (Reveal 1989, Neel

and Barrows 1990, Hickman 1993).

Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum is known from seven pebble

plain complexes in the San Bernardino Mountains (Krantz 1981a, Neel and

Barrows 1990, CNDDB 1997). Reports of this taxon in Ventura County

(Twisselmann 1967, Reveal 1979, and Hickman 1993) are based on

specimens subsequently determined to be E. kennedyi var. kennedyi

(Reveal and Munz 1968, Reveal 1989). Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum is known to occur on FS, CDFG, and private lands. All of

the sites supporting this taxon are threatened.

Poa atropurpurea

Poa atropurpurea, a member of the grass family (Poaceae), was

described by Frank Lamson-Scribner (1898) based on two collections by

Samuel B. Parish. One specimen (number 2968) was collected in 1894 and

another (number 3696) was collected in 1895 at Bear Valley, San

Bernardino Mountains, California. This species has not been known by

any other name (Keck 1959, Soreng 1993). Poa atropurpurea is a

dioecious (separate male and female plants), tufted perennial with

creeping rhizomes (Soreng 1993). The inflorescence is an erect, dense

spike-like panicle (compound floral axis) 3 to 7 cm (8 to 18 in) high.

The lemmas (lower of the two bracts enclosing the flower in the

spikelet of grasses) are smooth, faintly nerved and less than 3.5 mm

(0.14 in) long. The glumes (scaly bracts of the spikelets) are 1.5 to 2

mm (0.06 to 0.08 in) long. This species flowers from early May to June

or July. Poa atropurpurea may be distinguished from P. pratensis

(Kentucky bluegrass), with which it is often associated, by its shorter

inflorescences, contracted panicles, and glabrous lemmas and calluses

(extension of the inner scale of the spikelet) (Soreng 1993).

Poa atropurpurea occurs in montane meadows in the Big Bear region

of the San Bernardino Mountains, as well as in meadows in the Laguna

Mountains and Palomar Mountains of San Diego County at elevations of

1,800 to 2,300 m (6,000 to 7,500 ft) (Sproul 1979, Krantz 1981b, Winter

1991, Curto 1992). This species occurs near the drier margins of

meadows (Krantz 1981b, Winter 1991) described as vernally wet

marshlands by Hirshberg (1994). Eleven population centers of P.

atropurpurea currently are known to exist in the San Bernardino

Mountains and are often found at meadow sites with Taraxacum

californicum (Krantz 1981b). Clones, consisting of numerous erect culms

(stems), are about 1 m (3 ft) in diameter and may intermingle (Soreng,

pers. comm. 1996). Two of the 11 known populations in the San

Bernardino Mountains are about 9 ha (23 ac) in size and are located on

FS land (Holcomb Valley and Wildhorse Meadows), one 2 ha (5 ac) site is

administered by CDFG (North Baldwin Lake), one 9-ha (20-ac) site is

cooperatively owned by the FS and a private youth camp (Hitchcock

Ranch), and seven sites, about 20 ha (50 ac) total, are privately owned

(Krantz 1981b). Eight of the sites are less than 2.5 ha (6 ac) in area.

Fewer than 40 ha (100 ac) of habitat for this species are known to

remain in the San Bernardino Mountains.

Sproul (1979) reported that there were four known populations of

Poa atropurpurea in the Laguna Mountains of San Diego County,

California. Curto (1992) reported a 1981 collection of P. atropurpurea

from Mendenhall Meadow in the Palomar Mountains of San Diego County.

Poa atropurpurea was thought to be extirpated from the Laguna Mountains

and the Palomar Mountains (Curto 1992). However, in 1993, two

populations, each consisting of about 50 individuals, were located

within the Cleveland National Forest in the Laguna Mountains (Winter,

pers. comm. 1993). Hirshberg (1994) reported finding more than 1,000

plants of P. atropurpurea at seven sites near Laguna Meadow. Five of

these sites appear to encompass the four sites noted by Sproul (1979),

the other two are apparently newly reported sites. In total, this

species is known from less than 20 populations throughout its range.

Co-occurrence of male and female plants of this species is

necessary for seed production. Curto (1992) found that although male

and female culms were about equal in number among herbarium collections

of this species from the San Bernardino Mountains, collections from Big

Laguna and Mendenhall meadows of San Diego County were all female

culms. Hirshberg (1994) found only four male

[[Page 49009]]

plants, two at each of two different sites, during her study of P.

atropurpurea on the Cleveland National Forest in San Diego County.

Soreng (pers. comm. 1996) suggested that it is possible the San Diego

County populations have turned apomictic (not needing fertilization).

This would be evident by a seed set of 20 percent or higher. See Factor

E for further discussion of the importance of dioecy in this species.

Taraxacum californicum

Taraxacum californicum, a member of the sunflower family

(Asteraceae), was described by Philip A. Munz and Ivan Johnston (1925)

based on a specimen collected by W.M. Pierce in May 1922 in Bear

Valley, San Bernardino Mountains, California. Specimens referable to

this species have been previously considered T. officinale var. lividum

(Waldst. & Kit.) Koch (Hall 1907), T. lapponicum Kililm. (Handel-

Mazzetti 1907), T. ceratophorum DC. (Sherff 1920), or T. ceratophorum

var. bernardinum Jepson (Jepson 1925). The first three combinations are

taxa now known not to be present in the region or included with other

European species. The last combination (Jepson 1925) was published

after the combination T. californicum had been published and therefore

is considered a synonym.

Taraxacum californicum is a thick-rooted perennial herb. The

leaves, arranged in basal rosettes, 0.5 to 2 dm (2 to 8 in) high, are

light green, oblanceolate, nearly entire to sinuate-dentate (wavy

toothed) from 5 to 12 cm (2 to 5 in) long and 1 to 3 cm (0.4 to 1.2 in)

wide. The light yellow flowers are clustered in heads on leafless

stalks. The outer phyllaries (bracts of the inflorescence) are erect,

lance-ovate and 5 to 7 mm (0.2 to 0.3 in) long while the inner

phyllaries are lance-linear, and 12 to 15 mm (0.5 to 0.6 in) long.

Plants flower from May to August. Taraxacum californicum is readily

distinguished from other exotic members of this genus within its range

by its lighter green foliage, sub-entire leaves, stocky cylindrical

heads with truncate bases, erect phyllaries, paler yellow flowers, and

small fruits (Munz and Johnston 1925, Stebbins 1993).

Taraxacum californicum occurs in moist meadow habitats in the San

Bernardino Mountains at elevations from 2,000 to 2,800 m (6,700 to

9,000 ft) and is often associated with Poa atropurpurea. These taxa are

restricted to the relatively open edges apart from more mesic plants

such as P. pratensis, Carex spp. or Juncus spp. (Krantz 1981b). The

perimeter of such meadows often intergrades with sagebrush scrub

dominated by sagebrush or pine forest (Krantz 1981b). Taraxacum

californicum is known to occur on FS, CDFG, municipal, and private

lands. About 20 occurrences of the species are currently known, with

population sizes ranging from 2 to 300 individuals. About half of these

occurrences are located within, or adjacent to, urbanized areas such as

Big Bear City, Big Bear Lake Village, and Sugarloaf in San Bernardino

County, California. All of these occurrences are threatened by

urbanization.

Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum

Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum, a member of the mint

family (Lamiaceae), was described by F. Harlan Lewis (1945) based on

specimens collected in 1941 by M. L. Hilend at Hidden Lake, San Jacinto

Mountains, Riverside County, California. Trichostema austromontanum

ssp. compactum is a compact, soft-villous (with long, shaggy hairs)

annual approximately 10 cm (4 in) tall with short internodes (stem

segments between leaves). The leaves are elliptic (oval but narrowed at

both ends). The blue, five-lobed flowers are less than 7 mm (0.3 in)

long, with two blue stamens. The fruit is a smooth, four-lobed nutlet.

This taxon flowers in July and August. T. austromontanum ssp. compactum

is shorter and has shorter internodes than T. austromontanum ssp.

austromontanum.

Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum historically has been

restricted to a single vernal pool known as Hidden Lake (Lake Surprise

in Hall (1902)) at an elevation of about 2,650 m (8,700 ft) in the

Mount San Jacinto State Wilderness. Hidden Lake is the only naturally

occurring body of water in the San Jacinto Mountains. The entire known

range for this plant encompasses less than 0.8 ha (2 ac) (Michael

Hamilton, pers. comm., 1996). The population size of T. austromontanum

ssp. compactum declines during periods of either above or below normal

precipitation because of its position along the perimeter of the vernal

pool habitat (Hamilton 1991). Between 1979 and 1991, the population

sizes of this species fluctuated from less than 50 to 10,000

individuals (Hamilton 1991).

Previous Federal Action

Federal government action on five of the six taxa contained in this

rule began as a result of section 12 of the Act, which directed the

Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution to prepare a report on those

plants considered to be threatened, endangered, or extinct in the

United States. This report, designated as House Document No. 94-51, and

presented to Congress on January 9, 1975, recommended Arenaria ursina,

Poa atropurpurea, and Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum for

endangered status. Castilleja cinerea, and Taraxacum californicum,

included in House Document No. 94-51, were recommended for threatened

status. The Service published a notice in the July 1, 1975, Federal

Register (40 FR 27823) of its acceptance of the report as a petition

within the context of section 4(c)(2) (now section 4(b)(3)(A)) of the

Act, and of the Service's intention to review the status of the plant

taxa named therein, including Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Poa

atropurpurea, Taraxacum californica, and Trichostema austromontanum

ssp. compactum. On June 16, 1976, the Service published a proposal in

the Federal Register (41 FR 24523) to list approximately 1,700 vascular

plant species as endangered species pursuant to section 4 of the Act.

Arenaria ursina, Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum, Poa

atropurpurea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum were included

in the June 16, 1976, Federal Register notice.

General comments received in response to the June 16, 1976,

proposal were summarized in an April 26, 1978, Federal Register notice

(43 FR 17909). A revision of the Smithsonian report (Ayensu and

DeFilipps 1978), provided new lists based on additional data on

taxonomy, geographic range, and endangered status of taxa as well as

suggestions of taxa to be included or deleted from the earlier listing.

Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, not included in the first

Smithsonian report, was recommended for threatened status in Ayensu and

DeFilipps (1978). The recommended status for other taxa listed above

did not change from the House Document 94-51 listings. Acknowledgment

of the Service's acceptance of this document as a petition was included

in a notice of findings on certain petitions published in the Federal

Register on February 15, 1983 (48 FR 6752). Although the 1978

amendments to the Act required that all proposals over 2 years old be

withdrawn, a 1-year grace period was given to those proposals already

more than 2 years old. On December 10, 1979, Federal Register (44 FR

70796), the Service published a notice of withdrawal for the portion of

the June 16, 1976, proposal that had not been made final, along with

four other proposals that had expired.

[[Page 49010]]

The Service published an updated Notice of Review of plants on

December 15, 1980 (45 FR 82479). This notice included Poa atropurpurea,

Taraxacum californicum, and Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum

as category-1 candidates. Category-1 candidates were those species for

which the Service had sufficient information concerning biological

vulnerability and threats to support preparation of listing proposals.

Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum were included in the notice as category-2 candidate

species. Category-2 candidates were those species for which available

data indicated listing was probably appropriate, but for which

sufficient data on biological vulnerability and threats were not

presently available to support proposed rules. On November 28, 1983,

the Service published a supplement (48 FR 53639) to the December 15,

1980, Notice of Review, (45 FR 82479). The status of the six taxa

remained unchanged until the Service published a Notice of Review in

the Federal Register on February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6183), in which the

status of Arenaria ursina was changed to category-1. Subsequent to the

1990 notice, additional information became available resulting in

Castilleja cinerea and Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum being

changed to category-1 status.

On August 2, 1995, the Service published in the Federal Register

(60 FR 39337) a proposal to list two species, Poa atropurpurea and

Taraxacum californicum, as endangered and four taxa, Arenaria ursina,

Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, and

Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum, as threatened. That proposed

rule also included Arabis johnstonii to be listed as threatened. The

proposal to list Arabis johnstonii has been withdrawn and is addressed

in a separate document published concurrently in this same Federal

Register issue. The Service now determines Poa atropurpurea and

Taraxacum californicum to be endangered species and Arenaria ursina,

Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, and

Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum to be threatened species.

Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act requires the Secretary to make

findings on petitions within 12 months of their receipt. Section

2(b)(1) of the 1982 amendments further requires that all petitions

pending on October 13, 1982, be treated as having been newly submitted

on that date. This was the case for the six taxa covered by this rule,

because the 1975 and 1978 Smithsonian reports had been accepted as

petitions. On October 13, 1983, the Service found that the petitioned

listing of these species was warranted, but precluded by other pending

listing actions, in accordance with section 4(b)(3)(B)(iii), of the

Act. Notification of this finding was published in the Federal Register

on January 20, 1984 (49 FR 2485). Such a finding requires the petition

to be recycled annually, pursuant to section 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act.

The finding was reviewed each October, annually from 1984 through 1993.

Publication of the proposed rule constituted the warranted finding for

these six taxa.

The processing of this final rule follows the Service's listing

priority guidance published in the Federal Register on May 8, 1998 (63

FR 25502). The guidance clarifies the order in which the Service will

process rulemakings. Highest priority will be processing emergency

listing rules for any species determined to face a significant and

imminent risk to its well being (Tier 1). Second priority will be

processing final determinations on proposed additions to the lists of

endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; the processing of new

proposals to add species to the lists; the processing of administrative

petition findings to add species to the lists, delist species, or

reclassify listed species (petitions filed under section 4 of the Act);

and a limited number of delisting and reclassifying actions (Tier 2).

Processing of proposed or final designations of critical habitat will

be accorded the lowest priority (Tier 3). This final rule is a Tier 2

action and is being completed in concurrence with the current Listing

Priority Guidance. All six taxa in this rule face high magnitude

threats. This rule has been updated to reflect any changes in

information concerning distribution, status and threats since the

publication of the proposed rule.

Summary of Comments and Recommendations

In the August 2, 1995, proposed rule (60 FR 39337) and associated

notifications, all interested parties were requested to submit factual

reports or information that might contribute to the development of a

final rule. The 30-day comment period closed on October 9, 1995.

Appropriate Federal and State agencies, County and City governments,

scientific organizations, and other interested parties were contacted

and requested to comment. Individual newspaper notices of the proposed

rule were published in the San Diego Union-Tribune and The Press-

Enterprise on August 10, 1995. No request for a public hearing was

received.

During the comment period, the Service received two written

comments, both of which opposed the proposed listing. Both comments

related only to the taxa that occur in the Big Bear Valley region of

the San Bernardino Mountains, California. The comments relevant to this

final rule have been organized into specific issues. These issues and

the Service's response to each are summarized as follows:

Issue 1: One commenter questioned the existence of pebble plains in

Big Bear Valley.

Service Response: Pebble plains as a biological community have been

described in several scientific studies (Holland 1986; Skinner and

Pavlik 1994; Krantz 1981a, 1983; Freas and Murphy 1990; Neel and

Barrows 1990; and Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995). They were first called

pavement plains (Derby 1979, Derby and Wilson 1978). Several of these

studies (Derby 1979, Krantz 1981a) describe the distribution of pebble

plain habitat in Big Bear Valley. The ecologically unique nature of

these areas and their associated flora were discussed in Derby and

Wilson (1978). Pebble plains have been described as the ``most

spectacular ecologic island'' in Southern California (Schoenherr 1992).

Issue 2: One commenter stated that although meadow and pebble

plains habitat was eliminated by the filling of Big Bear Lake

Reservoir, the plants are ``still abundant in the entire valley.'' This

commenter also stated that mining was not a threat to the plant species

because vegetation was still growing on the old mine tailing piles.

Service Response: Pebble plains are often associated with montane

meadow habitat, as described in the Background section. Meadow habitat

in the Bear Valley region, including near Holcomb Valley and Erwin

Lake, decreased by 76 percent between the late 1800's and 1932. From

1932 to 1990 there was a further decrease of 64 percent in remaining

meadow habitat (Krantz 1990). Overall there has been a 91 percent

decrease in meadow habitat since the late 1800's. A 91 percent decrease

is significant because it represents the permanent loss of occupied and

potential habitat for several of the taxa included in this final rule,

and other sensitive or listed species associated with this habitat.

Although a number of native and exotic plant species are able to grow

on mine tailing piles, this habitat does not provide suitable

conditions for any of the species addressed in this final rule. Meadow

and pebble plain habitat has

[[Page 49011]]

never been extensive in the Big Bear Valley area relative to the

surrounding forest region. For example, one estimate of the number of

remaining acres of pebble plain habitat on National Forest lands is 208

ha (514 ac) or about 0.3 percent of the total acreage of just the Big

Bear Ranger District. These taxa, endemic to the Big Bear Valley area,

are, by all accounts, rare in the region, the County, and the State.

Issue 3: One commenter stated that the threat of hybridization or

``promiscuous occupation of genetic absorption with exotic species'' is

not supported by documentation.

Service Response: In a recent review of extinction by

hybridization, Rhymer and Simberloff (1996) stated that non-indigenous

taxa can bring about the extinction of native flora or fauna. They

cited examples among mammals, birds, amphibians, fish, and plants.

Rieseberg (1991) outlined case histories of introgression in plants,

including Cercocarpus traskiae, an endangered species from Santa

Catalina Island, California. Krantz (in litt. 1993) noted specimens

that had characteristics of both Taraxacum californicum and the

introduced species T. officinale. The precise origin of these

intermediate individuals has not yet been determined. Genetic swamping

by Poa pratensis is a possible threat to P. atropurpurea (Curto 1992).

Issue 4: One commenter questioned the threat of fuelwood harvesting

to the pebble plain species. The commenter noted that people are

required to have a permit to cut fuelwood and are not allowed to drive

off existing roads to collect this wood. The commenter further stated

that there would be less harm done to plant growth by trampling and

rolling of cut wood to get to the trucks if the trucks were allowed to

drive to the trees on the old woodcutters' roads, which have now been

fenced off.

Service Response: Fuelwood harvest is permitted in designated areas

of the Big Bear region, such as portions of Holcomb Valley (SBNF, in

litt. 1995). Most sensitive habitats are not within the areas where

fuelwood harvesting is permitted. However, impacts related to the use

of roads that traverse nearby sensitive habitats do occur. The San

Bernardino National Forest (Odell 1988) has closed roads to protect

sensitive plant habitat in the Arrastre Flats and Union Flats area.

Few, if any, areas of the Forest open to permitted fuelwood harvest

have been impacted by these road closures. The closures do not preclude

access by forest users and have produced no adverse cumulative impacts.

However, vehicles utilizing unauthorized off-road areas directly impact

pebble plains habitat (Odell 1988). Damage caused by ORVs on pebble

plains and meadows can be significant. ORVs destroy smaller shrubs and

annuals (Wilshire 1983). There have been numerous incidents of damage

to the vehicle exclusion fencing around several pebble plain sites

(Henderson, in litt. 1997). These incidents were often associated with

damage to the habitat. An incident of vehicle trespass on a pebble

plain in March 1992, resulted in direct damage to approximately 930

square meters (10,000 sq ft) of habitat (Neel and Chaney 1992). Also,

damage to surface hydrological characteristics occurred because the

soils were wet and deep ruts were produced by the vehicle. These

incidents are further discussed under Factor A.

Issue 5: One commenter questioned the economic value of the taxa

listed herein and another stated that listing these plants would result

in severe depreciation of property value.

Service Response: Under section 4(b)(7)(A) of the Act, a listing

determination must be based solely on the best scientific and

commercial data available. The legislative history of this provision

clearly states the intent of Congress to ``ensure'' that listing

decisions are ``based solely on biological criteria and to prevent non-

biological criteria from affecting such decisions'' (H.R. Rep. No. 97-

835, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 19 (1982)). As further stated in the

congressional report, ``economic considerations have no relevance to

determinations regarding the status of species.'' Because the Service

is specifically precluded from considering economic impacts in a final

decision on a proposed listing, the Service cannot consider the

possible economic consequences of listing the six taxa.

Issue 6: A commenter questioned whether cattle grazing is a threat

to these species because he claims cattle had not grazed in Big Bear

Valley for over 40 years.

Service Response: Several of the meadow sites in the Big Bear area

have been impacted by grazing by domestic livestock (e.g., Bluff Lake,

Hitchcock Ranch, Shay Meadow, Wildhorse Meadow (Krantz 1981b; Krantz,

in litt. 1993)). All of the populations of Poa atropurpurea in the

Laguna Meadow and Mendenhall Meadow are located within grazing

allotments currently used by cattle (Winter 1991). Grazing by domestic

and feral animals other than cattle also poses a threat to the species

listed herein. Native ungulates are facultative browser/grazers or

browsers (feed primarily on woody plants) rather than grazers (feed

primarily on herbaceous plants) (Painter 1995). Domestic ungulates are

grazers which tend to do more damage to herbaceous plants such as Poa

atropurpurea. Krantz (1981a) documented the presence of feral burros on

the Sawmill and Baldwin Lake pebble plains. Neel and Barrows (1990)

concurred with this assessment and added that burros regularly have

been observed on the Gold Mountain pebble plain. Grazing can

destabilize plant communities by aiding the spread and establishment of

non-native taxa (Painter 1995) and thus diminish populations of Poa

atropurpurea (Winter 1991), as well as T. californicum because

Taraxacum officinale is favored over T. californicum under grazing

conditions (Henderson, in litt. 1997).

Issue 7: One commenter asked why Federal and State agencies and

their projects or actions are exempt from protecting endangered or

threatened species.

Service Response: The Act directs Federal agencies to protect and

promote the recovery of listed species. Collection of listed plants on

Federal lands is prohibited. Proposed Federal projects and actions

including activities on private or non-Federal lands that involve

Federal funding or permitting require review to ensure they will not

jeopardize the survival of any listed species, including plants. The

Act does not prohibit ``take'' of listed plants on private lands, but

landowners should be aware of State laws protecting imperiled plants.

Section 7(a) of the Act requires Federal agencies to evaluate their

actions with respect to any species that is proposed or listed as

endangered or threatened and with respect to its critical habitat, if

any is designated. Section 7(a)(2) requires Federal agencies to ensure

that activities they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to

jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species or destroy or

adversely modify its critical habitat. If a Federal action may affect a

listed species or its critical habitat, the responsible Federal agency

must enter into formal consultation with the Service.

Although State law may provide a measure of protection to species,

these laws are not adequate to protect the species in all cases.

Numerous activities do not fall under the purview of State law, such as

certain projects proposed by the Federal government and projects

falling under State statutory exemptions. Where overriding social and

economic considerations can be demonstrated, these laws allow project

proposals to go forward, even in cases where the continued existence of

the

[[Page 49012]]

species may be jeopardized or where adverse impacts are not mitigated

to the point of insignificance. The inadequacy of existing State and

Federal regulatory mechanisms is one of the factors that necessitates

Federal listing of these plant taxa. Please see the ``Summary of

Factors Affecting the Species'' section, specifically Factor D, and the

``Available Conservation Measures'' section in this rule for additional

information about this issue.

Issue 8: One commenter stated that ``large scale'' timber harvest

does not occur in the Big Bear Valley region, only dead trees are

removed and some thinning is done by the FS, therefore timber harvest

is not a threat to the plant species.

Service Response: The ``Background'' section of the proposed rule

identified timber harvest as having affected the habitat of Arenia

ursina, Castilleja cinerea over the past 100 years, and further stated

that timber harvest has continued to affect the habitat of Eriogonum

kennedyi var. austromontanum, Poa atropupurea, and Taraxacum

californicum. Although impacts have occurred in the past from timber

harvest, the final rule has been revised and does not identify timber

harvest as a current threat to any of the plant taxa.

Issue 9: One commenter questioned the threat from hiking and other

recreational activities, as well as threats from collecting, scientific

studies, and ``overutilization.''

Service Response: Excessive trampling may alter the hydrology of

the habitats of the taxa listed herein and cause conditions such as

ponding along trails or drying below the trails as a result of soil

compression. These in turn may lead to conditions that affect seedling

establishment or species persistence in these areas. Recreational

activities that include the use of ORVs continue to have significant

negative impacts on pebble plain habitat (see discussion under Factor

A). Botanists often prefer to collect species considered rare for

exchange with other institutions (see discussion under Factor B). Some

limited collection from Federal lands could be permitted for

responsible research by qualified individuals, as well as for periodic

documentation purposes for recognized institutional collections.

Peer Review

In accordance with interagency policy published on July 1, 1994 (59

FR 34270), the Service solicited the expert opinions of three

independent specialists regarding pertinent scientific or commercial

data and assumptions relating to the taxonomy, population models, and

supportive biological and ecological information for the taxa under

consideration for listing. The purpose of such review is to ensure

listing decisions are based on scientifically sound data, assumptions,

and analyses, including input of appropriate experts and specialists.

There were no responses to the Service's requests for peer review of

this listing action.

Summary of Factors Affecting the Species

Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) and regulations (50

CFR Part 424) promulgated to implement the listing provisions of the

Act set forth the procedures for adding species to the Federal list. A

species may be determined to be endangered or threatened due to one or

more of the five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. These

factors and their application to Arenaria ursina B.L. Rob. (Bear Valley

sandwort), Castilleja cinerea A. Gray (ash-gray Indian paintbrush),

Eriogonum kennedyi S. Watson var. austromontanum Munz & I.M. Johnst.

(southern mountain wild buckwheat), Poa atropurpurea Scribn. (San

Bernardino bluegrass), Taraxacum californicum Munz & I.M. Johnst.

(California taraxacum), and Trichostema austromontanum F.H. Lewis ssp.

compactum F.H. Lewis (Hidden Lake bluecurls) are as follows. A summary

of the threats to each of these taxa is provided in Table 1.

A. The Present or threatened destruction, modification, or

curtailment of their habitat or range. The six taxa listed herein

currently are imperiled by a variety of activities that result in

habitat modification, destruction, degradation, and fragmentation.

These activities include urbanization, ORV activity, alteration of

hydrological conditions, and vandalism.

Table 1.--Summary of Threats

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Threats

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Species Exotic * ORV Grazing/ Limited

Trampling plants activity Urbanization browsing numbers

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arenaria ursina............. x x x x

Castilleja cinerea.......... x x x x x

Eriogonum kennedyi var.

kennedyi................... x x x x

Poa atropurpurea............ x x x x x x

Taraxacum californicum...... x x x x x x

Trichostema austromontanum

ssp. compactum............. x x

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* ORV = off road vehicle.

Meadow Habitats

Significant loss of meadow habitats in the Bear Valley began in the

late 1880's with the construction of a dam that resulted in the

formation of Big Bear Lake. There were 6,200 ha (15,300 ac) of meadow/

grassland in the Big Bear Valley region and Big Meadow area of the

Santa Ana River prior to construction of the dam (Leiberg 1900) and

1,190 ha (2,900 ac) about 30 years later (USFS 1932). This represents

an 81 percent decrease. Krantz (1990) estimated that there are

currently less than 400 ha (1,000 ac) of meadow habitat remaining in

Big Bear and Holcomb valleys. Overall, 91 percent of all meadow habitat

in those areas has been destroyed since the turn of the century.

The decline of Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum can be

attributed to urbanization, ORV traffic, and alteration of hydrological

regimes that have destroyed, degraded, or fragmented their meadow

habitat (Krantz 1980, 1981b). Approximately 70 percent of the remaining

Poa atropurpurea habitat in the Big Bear region is unprotected and none

of the P. atropurpurea populations in San Diego County are protected

(see Factor D and Factor E for additional discussion). Portions of two

populations in Laguna Meadows were destroyed by telephone line

trenching and soil removal for

[[Page 49013]]

construction of the earthen dam at Big Laguna Lake (Sproul and

Beauchamp 1979). A portion of one site in Big Bear Valley,

intentionally graded by the landowner in 1991, contained P.

atropurpurea and habitat for the federally listed pedate checker-mallow

(Sidalcea pedata) (Krantz, in litt., 1993). Populations of P.

atropurpurea were also destroyed by development of the facilities at

Big Bear Airport and expansion of Bear Mountain Ski Area (Krantz, in

litt., 1993). Krantz (in litt., 1993) further noted, without indicating

causes, the apparent extirpation of the occurrences of Taraxacum

californicum at Moonridge Meadow, Rathbone Meadow, Sugarloaf, and Erwin

Lake.

Current continuing threats to the meadow taxa discussed in this

rule include the relatively unrestricted development of privately owned

parcels in the Big Bear area outside the boundaries of the San

Bernardino National Forest. Apparently, all of the known occurrences of

Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum that fall within areas

depicted on a current zoning map for the City of Big Bear Lake are at

sites zoned residential, commercial or flood plain. This includes four

of the seven privately owned sites and over half of the privately owned

habitat of Poa atropurpurea in the Big Bear area. This also includes

four of the 10 privately owned sites supporting Taraxacum californicum.

Within a tract on Eagle Point there is, however, one exclusionary 2.8

ha (7 ac) parcel set aside for rare plant protection by the City of Big

Bear Lake that reportedly includes meadow habitat as well as some

plants of Castilleja cinerea (City of Big Bear Lake, in litt. 1997).

There are no apparent use restrictions on this parcel other than access

limitations and no building sites. The City of Big Bear Lake zoning map

includes the community of Moonridge. Within the area covered by this

zoning map there are at least five occurrences of Poa atropurpurea, at

least four occurrences of Taraxacum californicum, and occurrences of

Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum. Some sites for the listed species Sidalcea pedata are

also covered by the zoning map. The Service is aware of interest by a

property owner in opening a facility at Pan Hot Springs. This area

supports Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum, as well as the

federally listed endangered species Sidalcea pedata and Thelypodium

stenopetalum (slender-petaled mustard). This proposed facility has the

potential of fragmenting and degrading the meadow habitat of these

taxa. A current proposal for construction on nine parcels totaling 1.6

ha (4 ac) at Boulder Bay on the south shore of Big Bear Lake could

adversely impact Poa atropurpurea and T. californicum. These taxa, as

well as other sensitive taxa, are known to occur in the vicinity of the

project site.

A road traverses a site along Rathbone Creek that was meadow and

pebble plain habitat. The area between the road and the creek is a

parcel being used as a dump site for dredge materials. Roads, such as

the one just east of Bluff Lake, traverse occupied habitat of Poa

atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum. Several of the meadow sites,

such as North Baldwin Lake, Wildhorse Springs, and Holcomb Valley are

fragmented by ORV incursions. Road ruts can lead to alterations in the

surface hydrology of meadow habitats (Krantz 1981b). Campground

development has been proposed for meadow sites at Cienega Seca and the

north shore of Big Bear Lake (CNDDB 1997).

Poa atropurpurea faces high magnitude threats throughout the

majority of its range from one or more of the following--development,

grazing, road maintenance, and introduced taxa, as well as the

increased fragmentation of habitat associated with the above

activities. The dioecious nature (separate male and female plants) of

this species compounds any threat at a given site. Taraxacum

californicum faces the same high magnitude threats from the same

sources over about half of its range.

Pebble Plains Habitat

The decline of Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea and Eriogonum

kennedyi var. austromontanum, all of which are largely confined to

pebble plain habitats, can be attributed to habitat destruction,

degradation, and fragmentation resulting from urbanization, ORV

traffic, fuelwood harvesting, mining activities, and the alteration of

hydrological regimes. Neel and Barrows (1990) listed the current total

acreage of pebble plains as 220 ha (545 ac), including about 60 ha (150

ac) of pebble plains habitat not considered by Krantz (1981a, in litt.

1987). Krantz (in litt. 1987) estimated that historically there were

280 ha (700 ac) of pebble plains, and that currently there are only 170

ha (420 ac). Neel and Barrows' (1990) figure represents a 21 percent

decrease from the estimated historic extent of pebble plains in the

region. Krantz (in litt. 1987) did not include two areas considered

pebble plains by Neel and Barrows (1990). These omissions were probably

due, in part, to the fact that these areas were not known to support an

indicator species, Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum.

Nine existing pebble plain complexes were identified by Neel and

Barrows (1990). Of the 220 ha (545 ac) of this highly restricted

habitat, about 208 ha (514 ac) is administered by the FS and 12 ha (32

ac) occurs on private land (Neel and Barrows 1990). Nearly all the

complexes support populations of these species and generally, such

populations are fairly evenly distributed throughout.

Urbanization has resulted in the destruction of 85 ha (210 ac) of

former habitat in the Sawmill complex near the community of Sugarloaf

(Krantz, in litt. 1987). Similarly, development has eliminated habitat

within the Big Bear Lake complex, including areas near Fawnskin,

Mallard Lagoon, Eagle Point, and Metcalf Bay (CNDDB 1997) and has

continued on small unprotected sites (Neel and Barrows 1990).

Relatively unrestricted development of privately owned parcels that

support pebble plain species is a threat to Arenaria ursina, Castilleja

cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum. This was described

above under the ``Meadow habitats'' section. Unpermitted grading

eliminated pebble plains habitat at Castle Glen (Krantz, in litt.,

1993). A current proposal for development on nine parcels totaling 1.6

ha (4 ac) at Boulder Bay (Big Bear Lake complex) on the south shore of

Big Bear Lake could adversely impact sensitive taxa including Arenaria

ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi ssp. austromontanum.

The most significant and persistent threat to the pebble plains is

ORV activity (Krantz, in litt. 1987; Neel and Barrows 1990; Henderson,

in litt. 1997). Incidents involving destruction or degradation of

pebble plains habitat by ORVs continue to present a significant threat

to all pebble plain sites (Maile Neel, SBNF, pers. comm. 1993; Krantz,

in litt. 1993; Henderson, in litt. 1997). Most privately owned pebble

plain sites receive no protection. A few sites, however, have voluntary

non-binding landowner agreements (see Factor D).

Over 11 km (7 mi) of FS roads and 16 km (10 mi) of unauthorized

routes directly impact pebble plain sites, such as Arrastre/Union Flats

(complex), Sawmill (part of Sawmill complex), Holcomb Valley (complex),

and Nelson Ridge (part of the North Baldwin Lake complex) (Odell 1988).

Although the FS does not permit activities that alter the hydrology of

pebble plains or meadows, unauthorized ORV traffic continues to be a

problem in many areas and contributes to hydrological

[[Page 49014]]

modifications of these sensitive habitats. The majority of the pebble

plains complexes are directly impacted by vehicle routes that may lead

to alterations in the surface hydrology (Krantz 1981a, Neel and Barrows

1990, Neel and Chaney 1992).

Normally, surface water flows evenly across the relatively

impervious pebble plains (Odell 1988). Pebble plains are extremely

susceptible to damage during spring thaw (Krantz 1981a). ORVs can

destroy plants and create deep ruts that change the water flow patterns

over the pebble plains and lead to increased erosion, which indirectly

affects a greater number of plants (Neel and Barrows 1990). ORVs can

cause the breakdown of soil structure although the erosion potential of

the soil is not considered high due to the moderate slopes and rainfall

(Neel and Barrows 1990). Vehicular activity also favors the

establishment of species more tolerant of such disturbance, thereby

altering the composition of the plant community over time (Lathrop

1983).

The pebble plain site at upper Sugarloaf (part of the Sawmill

complex) has been completely devegetated by ORV activity (Krantz in

litt., 1987) and Horseshoe Meadow has been degraded by unregulated

vehicle activity (Krantz, in litt. 1993). Pebble plain habitat in upper

Holcomb Valley (part of the Holcomb Valley complex) has been degraded

by vehicles driven around depressions with standing water during winter

(Neel and Barrows 1990; Krantz, in litt. 1987). This vehicle traffic

creates muddy areas unsuitable for the persistence or recruitment of

the plants. Vehicle roads and tracks lead to habitat fragmentation and

increase the potential for edge effects on the pebble plains.

The FS has implemented a number of measures including fencing,

signage, road closures, and active monitoring in an effort to protect

pebble plains from illegal ORV activity. Despite this action, over 40

percent of the pebble plain habitat within FS jurisdiction remains

unprotected (Neel and Barrows 1990).

Fences that protect virtually all of the large pebble plain sites

are often cut or removed, thus enabling vehicles to enter the plains

(Henderson, in litt., 1997). In February 1997, the FS removed rocks

placed on the Sawmill pebble plain, filled holes, and rewired the gate

as a result of ``extreme vehicle use'' at the Upper Sugarloaf/Sugarloaf

pebble plain area in August 1996. Vehicles were observed on a closed

road in Union Flat in July 1996, and, in that same month, vehicles had

driven onto the pebble plain at Gold Mountain (Henderson, in litt.

1997). All of these incidents occurred within fenced sites.

The FS has kept records of incidents of human-caused damage and

destruction to fenced areas of pebble plains from 1990 to 1997

(Henderson, in litt. 1997), but has not always correlated specific

habitat destruction events with incidents of trespass. However, a

single, well documented example is cited below.

The pebble plains near North Baldwin Lake, fenced and posted as

rare plant habitat, were extensively damaged in March 1992. A

construction vehicle from the San Bernardino County landfill was driven

over this site in an apparently intentional act of vandalism (Krantz,

in litt. 1993; Neel and Chaney 1992). The driver trespassed, drove over

the identifying signs and fences, and caused extensive damage to the

habitat (Neel and Chaney 1992). The soils were highly vulnerable to

disturbance because they were saturated. Over 1,200 sq m (13,000 sq ft)

of pebble plain habitat was moderately to severely damaged during this

incident (Neel and Chaney 1992). Restoration was required by the FS,

but it was not entirely successful because the indirect effects of the

vehicle incursion, including alteration of surface hydrology and the

subsequent invasion of exotic species, have significant, long-term

effects (Neel and Chaney 1992; Krantz, in litt. 1993).

Some sites near Baldwin Lake are subject to quartzite theft (CNDDB

1997). Mineral rights have been claimed on or near several of these

pebble plains, such as Arrastre Flat and North Baldwin Lake. There is a

deposit of high grade limestone just west of lower Holcomb Valley.

Quarrying of this limestone would eliminate the pebble plain (Neel and

Barrows 1990). Mining activities threaten pebble plain habitat by

direct removal or indirect impacts. This pebble plain reportedly

supports Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi

var. austromontanum. The associated meadows likely to be impacted

support Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum.

Activation or installation of wells north of the pebble plain in

lower Holcomb Valley (Neel and Barrows 1990), near Baldwin Lake

(Barrows 1989), or in Garner Valley, can alter the hydrological regime

of the habitat and threaten sensitive species. Alteration of the

direction of surface flow and rate of percolation may lead to changes

in the species composition of the site (Neel and Barrows 1990), make

the site unsuitable for one or more of the native taxa, and/or

facilitate the encroachment of non-native species.

The majority of the pebble plains and their associated species have

been and continue to be affected by habitat destruction and degradation

most frequently associated with ORV traffic and development of

privately owned parcels.

B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or

educational purposes. Some of the taxa may have become vulnerable to

collecting by curiosity seekers as a result of the increased publicity

following publication of the proposed rule. Some professional and

amateur botanists favor rare or unusual species for their collections

or because these are valuable to trade with other individuals or

collections (Mariah Steenson pers. comm. 1997). A survey of the

collections of a major herbarium in the region showed significant

increases in the numbers of collections of several pebble plain taxa,

following publication of an article describing this new habitat type.

These taxa include Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum

kennedyi var. austromontanum, considered in this rule, as well as other

pebble plain taxa, such as Arabis parishii, Antennaria dimorpha, and

Dudleya abramsii ssp. affinis (Wallace, in litt. 1997). A similar

increase in numbers of collections of the rare, native, meadow species

Taraxacum californicum occurred but not for the associated introduced

exotic T. officinale (Wallace pers. obs. 1997). Ayensu and DeFilipps

(1978) specifically cite over-collection as a threat to Eriogonum

kennedyi var. austromontanum. It is likely that the additional

attention given to these taxa as a result of this final rule will

result in efforts by some to collect specimens. This potential would be

exacerbated by publication of maps and descriptions of critical

habitat.

C. Disease or predation. Disease is not known to be a factor

affecting any of the taxa listed herein. The indirect effects of

grazing/browsing are discussed under Factor E. Soreng (pers. comm.

1996) found considerable thrip (minute insects that feed on plants)

damage to the ovaries of Poa atropurpurea in the Big Bear area. This

may result in low seed set but is presumably a natural phenomenon. In

some taxa, low seed set, high seed mortality, and infrequent

establishment may be offset by low mortality and greater longevity of

the plants (Pavlik 1987). Soreng (pers. comm. 1996) stated that seed

set in sexual taxa of Poa is about 10 percent. The additional impacts

associated with persistent grazing could eliminate any seed production

by this taxon. This, in turn, could decrease or eliminate establishment

of new plants of divergent genetic constitution.

[[Page 49015]]

D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms. Existing

regulatory mechanisms that could provide some protection for these

species include--(1) listing under the California Endangered Species

Act (CESA), (2) consideration under the California Environmental

Quality Act (CEQA), (3) FS management policies, (4) conservation

provisions under section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act, and (5)

land management by Federal, State, or local agencies, or by private

groups and organizations.

State Laws

The six taxa addressed in this rule are included in the California

Native Plant Society's Inventory (Skinner and Pavlik 1994), but none

have been listed as endangered or threatened by the State. Thus, the

CESA (Division 3, chapter 1.5, section 2050 et seq.) and the Native

Plant Protection Act (NPPA) (Division 2, chapter 10, section 1900 et

seq. of the California Fish and Game Code) provide no protection for

the six taxa in this rule.

The CDFG recognizes that the majority of plants on Lists 1A, 1B,

and 2 of the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of

California (Skinner and Pavlik 1994) would normally qualify for State

listing (Morey and Berg 1994). All six plant taxa in this rule are in

the CNPS Inventory on List 1B (Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered

in California and Elsewhere) (Skinner and Pavlik 1994). Under CEQA,

impacts to List 1B plants are considered significant and must be

addressed. CEQA obligates disclosure of environmental resources within

proposed project areas and may enhance opportunities for conservation

efforts. However, CEQA does not guarantee that such conservation

efforts will be implemented and several projects have resulted in the

unmitigated loss of habitat for Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea,

Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, Poa atropurpurea, and Taraxacum

californicum. These projects include expansion of the Big Bear Airport,

construction of ski areas, development of the Moonridge Golf Course

(Krantz 1981b), and approval of the Eagle Point development (Neel, in

litt. 1993). Furthermore, these taxa face threats that are not easily

controlled by existing regulations, particularly those discussed under

Factor A.

The CEQA requires a full disclosure of the potential environmental

impacts of proposed projects. The public agency with primary authority

or jurisdiction over the project is designated as the lead agency, and

is responsible for conducting a review of the project and consulting

with the other agencies concerned with the resources affected by the

project. Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines requires a finding of

significance if a project has the potential to ``reduce the number or

restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal.'' Once

significant effects are identified, the lead agency has the option to

require mitigation for effects through changes in the project or to

decide that overriding considerations make mitigation infeasible. In

the latter case, projects may be approved that cause significant

environmental damage, such as resulting in the loss of sites supporting

State-listed species. Mitigation plans usually involve the

transplantation of the plant species to an existing habitat or an

artificially created habitat. Following the creation of the

transplantation plan, the original site is destroyed. Therefore, if the

mitigation effort fails, the resource has already been lost. Protection

of listed species through CEQA is, therefore, dependent upon the

discretion of the lead agency involved.

FS Management

With the exception of Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum,

which only occurs on State lands, all of the taxa listed herein are

found on the San Bernardino National Forest and are recognized by the

FS as ``sensitive species'' (SBNF 1989). The FS has policies to protect

sensitive plant taxa, including attempting to establish these species

in suitable or historic habitat, encouraging land acquisitions to

protect sensitive plant habitat, establishing refugia for pebble plains

species, and not permitting activities that may alter the hydrology or

meadow habitat for sensitive plants (SBNF 1989). These guidelines,

however, have not been entirely effective. Bluff Lake, which is

privately owned and contains populations of Poa atropurpurea and

Taraxacum californicum, was identified as a potentially suitable

mitigation bank of wetland and wet meadow habitat for urban

developments in the region. However, plans by the FS to acquire Bluff

Lake are no longer being pursued because the parcel is not available

for sale (Maile Neel, SBNF, pers. comm. 1993). The extensive monitoring

and fence maintenance activities carried out by the San Bernardino

National Forest have not prevented damage to pebble plain sites in the

area.

Even if most of the remaining pebble plain and meadow habitats on

the San Bernardino National Forest could be adequately protected from

human disturbance, the amount of habitat presently occupied by Arenaria

ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, Poa

atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum may not be sufficient to

maintain their long-term viability in the absence of appropriate

recovery measures.

The Holcomb Valley/North Baldwin Lake region, which supports

populations of Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi

var. austromontanum, Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum, and

significant examples of pebble plain habitat, was designated a Special

Interest Area by the FS in 1989. No specific management plan has been

developed for the area due to resources being directed to higher

priority activities (Neel, pers. comm. 1993).

Management guidelines for meadow sites on the Cleveland National

Forest supporting Poa atropurpurea are outlined by Winter (1991). These

include the requirement to maintain viable populations at all known

localities. Other guidelines call for protection, enhancement, and

prevention of adverse modification of habitat for sensitive species.

They also call for prevention of fragmentation of the montane meadows.

However, there are no specific steps to achieve these goals outlined in

the document.

Clean Water Act

Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum could potentially be

affected by projects requiring a permit under section 404 of the Clean

Water Act. Under section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Army

Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulates the discharge of fill material

into waters of the United States, which includes navigable and isolated

waters, headwaters, and adjacent wetlands. Section 404 regulations

require that applicants obtain an individual permit to place fill for

projects affecting greater than 1.2 ha (3 ac) of waters of the United

States or greater than 500 linear feet of a streambed. Nationwide

Permit (NWP) No. 26 (33 CFR part 330) was established by the Department

of the Army to facilitate authorization of discharges of fill into

isolated waters (including wetlands and vernal pools) that cause the

loss of less than 1.2 ha (3 ac) of waters of the United States, and

that cause minimal individual and cumulative environmental impacts.

Projects that qualify for authorization under NWP 26 and that affect

less than 0.1 ha (\1/3\ ac) of isolated waters including wetlands may

proceed. Although the permittee must submit a report to the Corps

within 30 days of completion of the work, evaluation of

[[Page 49016]]

the impacts of such projects through the section 404 permit process is

precluded. It is possible that even projects as small as 0.1 ha (\1/3\

ac) could destroy some of the smaller occurrences in the urbanized

areas of Big Bear Valley, or alter the hydrology of a meadow or pebble

plain site. Road widening or stream channelization, such as that near

Fox Farm Road and Rathbone Creek may affect the surrounding habitat.

Even though Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum is associated

with a single vernal pool, it would not be affected by the Clean Water

Act because its entire distribution lies within Mount San Jacinto State

Wilderness.

The Corps may require that an individual section 404 permit be

obtained if projects otherwise qualifying under NWP 26 would have

greater than minimal individual or cumulative environmental impacts.

The Corps has been reluctant to withhold authorization under NWP 26

unless the existence of a federally listed threatened or endangered

species would be jeopardized.

Land Management

Representatives from various Federal, State, and local agencies,

and individuals from the private sector are developing a Coordinated

Resource Management Plan (CRMP) for the Big Bear Valley region. The

CRMP process is a planning tool that operates on the local level to

minimize conflicts among various user groups, landowners, and

governmental agencies. The goal of this process is to identify

sensitive biological resources and to integrate conservation efforts

with those of public and private entities. Although the Service

supports these efforts, little or no protection for the species

described herein will be guaranteed. This process is not legally

binding.

E. Other natural or manmade factors affecting their continued

existence. The six taxa listed herein are threatened by a variety of

other factors including trampling by livestock and humans, indirect

effects of grazing and browsing, competition with other plant species,

habitat fragmentation, and hybridization with non-native taxa.

Trampling may degrade habitat by soil compression and introduction

of seeds of non-native species. This leads to changes in the

composition of the vegetation and facilitates persistence of these non-

native species (Lathrop 1983, Fleischner 1994). The presence of

livestock typically changes the composition of native plant communities

by reducing or eliminating those species that cannot withstand

trampling, which enables more resistant, usually non-native species to

increase in abundance (Painter 1995).

Sites supporting Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum

kennedyi var. austromontanum have been moderately to heavily degraded

by cattle trampling in the past (e.g., Wildhorse Meadow, Holcomb

Valley, and North Baldwin Lake) (Krantz 1981a, Neel and Barrows 1990,

Krantz, in litt. 1993). These same taxa are occasionally trampled by

horses which gain access to some fenced pebble plain sites when the

fences are cut (Henderson, in litt. 1997). Some areas continue to be

impacted by cattle, horses, and feral burros. Habitat degradation from

trampling by feral burros continues at the North Baldwin Lake, Sawmill,

Onyx, and Gold Mountain pebble plain complexes (Barrows 1989, Neel and

Barrows 1990). This threat will be alleviated once burros are

completely removed and kept away from pebble plain sites, except Broom

Flat (about 50 percent of the Onyx complex). This removal process is

currently underway under provisions of the Big Bear Wild Burro

Territory Management Plan (Lardner 1996). It is not clear whether

burros will attempt to return to the area and what the FS's response

will be if that occurs.

Trampling by hikers and visitors has been noted at some sites. Due

to its accessibility, and localized habitat, the Trichostema

austromontanum ssp. compactum population at Mount San Jacinto State

Wilderness is particularly vulnerable to trampling by recreational

users. This site has been popular since the development of the Palm

Springs tramway in 1964 and the Desert Divide Trail from 1979 to 1981

(Hamilton, pers. comm. 1996). Several measures were initiated by the

State during the past decade to protect the vernal pool ecosystem and

the Trichostema population, including removing references to the site

from park interpretive materials and the elimination of marked trails

to the lake. These measures, however, have not prevented on-going

impacts from trampling by hikers and horses. Trampling by horses

crushes plants and creates depressions that retain water where seeds

and adult plants of T. austromontanum ssp. compactum drown (Hamilton

1991; Hamilton, pers. comm. 1996). Livestock concentrate their

activities around ponds and vernal wetlands. As a result, impacts to

mountain meadows may persist for decades (Painter 1995).

Trampling by livestock and people adversely affects Taraxacum

californicum and favors the establishment of the non-native T.

officinale. Only the latter species seems to have the ability to

produce flower heads and leaves close to the soil surface (Krantz, in

litt. 1993). Several sites supporting this species are near, or

traversed by trails, including Bluff Lake, sites along the south side

of Big Bear Lake, and Cienega Seca, for example (CNDDG 1997). Two

populations of Poa atropurpurea in Laguna Meadow (San Diego County)

were damaged by cattle trails (Sproul 1979). All of the occurrences of

Poa atropurpurea in Laguna Meadow and Mendenhall Meadow, Cleveland

National Forest, San Diego County are on currently occupied grazing

allotments, although cattle exclosures are on two of the sites (Winter

1991). Grazing by cattle during the fruiting season of Poa atropurpurea

is likely to eliminate a significant portion of any seed produced in a

given year. This problem is compounded by several factors; the species

is dioecious (separate male and female plants), and destruction of

flowers of either sexual form would likely directly affect the sexual

reproductive success for that year, which could, in turn, decrease the

potential for long term survival of the species. Meadow sites in the

Big Bear area, such as Bluff Lake, are also subject to trampling by

people and animals. One population of Castilleja cinerea, across from

Snow Valley Ski Area, was fragmented by trampling associated with the

construction of several large cabins, a parking lot, and trails.

Grazing by cattle, horses, and feral burros is a continuing threat

to Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum at meadow sites such as

Hitchcock Ranch, Shay Meadow, Bluff Lake, and Laguna Meadow (Winter

1991; CNDDB 1997; Lardner, pers. comm. 1997). Painter (1995) used the

term grazing to mean feeding primarily on herbaceous plants, and the

term browsing to mean feeding primarily on woody plants. Herbivory is a

combination of both of these terms (Painter 1995). Painter (1995)

considered cattle to be grazers, burros and horses to be browser/

grazers, and native deer to be browser/grazers. The significance of the

differences is that control of the non-native animals will reduce

grazing and browsing damage to levels tolerable by the native species.

Fleischner (1994) indicated that the loss of biodiversity, lowering of

population density, and disruption of ecosystem functioning are some of

the ecological costs of grazing by livestock. Krantz (1981b) noted that

the number of seeds produced by P. atropurpurea is reduced if it is

grazed during its flowering period.

Cattle grazing is a threat to Poa atropurpurea in grazing

allotments on

[[Page 49017]]

the Cleveland National Forest (Winter 1991, CNDDB 1997). Grazing can

reduce or eliminate seed set and thereby decrease recruitment and

genetic diversity. On the San Bernardino National Forest, there is no

current permittee for the grazing allotment at Wildhorse Meadow

(Lardner, pers. comm. 1997). Castilleja cinerea is on the Santa Ana

grazing allotment on Sugarloaf Ridge, which lacks a current permittee

(Lardner, pers. comm. 1997). Another population of Castilleja cinerea

is at Broom Flat where burros will continue to be allowed under the Big

Bear Wild Burro Territory Management Plan (Lardner, pers. comm. 1997).

Introduced species of grasses and forbs have invaded many of

California's native plant communities, where they often displace the

native flora. Non-native taxa often have greater invasive capabilities

than endemic species (Huenneke and Thompson 1995). Disturbances, such

as grazing, urban and residential development, and various recreational

activities facilitate introduction of non-native species. Non-native

plants may flourish under a grazing regime and may reduce or eliminate

native taxa through crowding or competition for resources. Deposition

of animal waste spreads ingested seeds and alters nutrient cycling

patterns, often favoring non-native taxa. Introduced plant taxa have

become established in many portions of the San Bernardino, San Jacinto,

and Laguna mountains and have likely reduced the amount of suitable

habitat for Taraxacum californicum, Poa atropurpurea (Krantz 1981b,

Curto 1992) and other associated native plant taxa. For example, the

invasion of the alien Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) is a threat to the

Sawmill pebble plain habitat, which supports populations of Arenaria

ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum

(Neel and Barrows 1990). Neel and Barrows (1990) also raised concerns

that damaged pebble plain sites will be taken over by native pines.

Pines can shade out other plants and the decay of their leaves releases

nutrients that support additional trees, further decreasing available

pebble plain habitat (Neel and Barrows 1990). Introduced species are

used as forage in San Bernardino and Cleveland National Forest grazing

allotments. Poa atropurpurea cannot successfully compete with non-

native grass species that are locally abundant by comparison (Winter

1991).

The dissected nature of the pebble plain complexes maximizes the

potential of edge effects on these complexes. There are normally low

levels of gene transfer among the complexes because of the differing

seasonal developmental stages of plants from different sites (Freas and

Murphy 1990). Further dissection of pebble plain sites makes them more

vulnerable to incursions of invasive exotics. There would likely also

be a decrease of gene flow among the remaining pebble plains sites. Poa

atropurpurea is dioecious (separate male and female plants) and has a

limited range. These species attributes are likely to increase the

probability that the species could be threatened if its habitat or

populations were further dissected.

Taraxacum californicum may be threatened by hybridization with the

introduced T. officinale (Krantz, in litt. 1993). Apparent hybrids

between these two taxa were observed in areas where they overlap in

distribution (Krantz, in litt. 1993; Krantz 1980). Because T.

californicum rarely occurs in the absence of T. officinale, the

potential for loss of genetic distinctiveness of the restricted species

exists. Poa atropurpurea may be threatened with the loss of its genetic

distinctiveness due to hybridization with P. pratensis. Curto (1992)

describes the different distinctive morphs of Poa pratensis complex

maintained by apomictic means described by Clausen (1961). Clausen

(1961) demonstrated, in controlled experiments, that progeny of crosses

between P. pratensis and other Poa species are morphologically within

the range of variation of P. pratensis. According to Clausen (1961),

Poa pratensis has the ability to absorb other entities. Curto (1992)

speculated that this may have been the fate of Poa atropurpurea in

Laguna Meadow. Mixed or simultaneous collections of both Poa

atropurpurea and P. pratensis are found in herbaria (Curto 1992,

Wallace pers. obs. 1997). This is in contrast to a statement by

Hirshberg (1994) that P. atropurpurea flowers 3 to 4 weeks earlier than

P. pratensis.

When a species exists in limited numbers of individuals, factors

that negatively affect the individuals may pose more significant

threats to the survival of the species. Poa atropurpurea, Taraxacum

californicum, and Trichostema austromontana ssp. compactum face this

threat. Poa atropurpurea has limited and possibly localized

distribution of the different sexual forms of the species. If one

sexual form is effectively isolated from the other, formation of

fertile seeds may be precluded and this will likely lead to some loss

of genetic diversity. Grazing may eliminate all of the seed crop for

the year. The threat of limited numbers in Taraxacum californicum would

likely make grazing and hybridization threats more significant within

local populations. The limited numbers and extremely localized range of

Trichostema austromontana ssp. compactum make this taxon more

susceptible to single disturbance events such as trampling during the

flowering season or alteration of the local water table from soil

compression.

The Service has carefully assessed the best scientific and

commercial information available regarding the past, present, and

future threats faced by these six taxa in determining to issue this

final rule. Based on this evaluation, the preferred action is to list

Poa atropurpurea and Taraxacum californicum as endangered. About 91

percent of the meadow habitat for these species has been eliminated

since the turn of the century. Approximately 70 percent of the

remaining meadow habitat is unprotected, subject to development such as

that recently proposed at Boulder Bay, wildlife viewing walks at

Baldwin Lake, fragmentation from ORV traffic, and grazing at several

sites such as Bluff Lake and Laguna Meadows. Both P. atropurpurea and

T. californicum may be crowded out by successful, invasive, co-

occurring, non-native species with which they may also hybridize. All

of the San Diego County sites for P. atropurpurea are on unprotected

grazing lands. These taxa are in danger of extinction throughout all or

a significant portion of their ranges due to habitat destruction and

alteration resulting from urban and recreational development,

alteration of hydrological regime, grazing by livestock and feral

burros, hybridization with non-native taxa, and competition from exotic

plant species. Alternatives to this action were considered but not

preferred because not listing these species, or listing them as

threatened, would not provide adequate protection and would not be

consistent with the Act.

For the reasons discussed below, the Service finds that Arenaria

ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, and

Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum are likely to become

endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a

significant portion of their ranges if identified threats are not

reduced or eliminated. Threats to these four taxa include habitat

destruction and alteration from urban development, ORV activity,

habitat degradation, predation by livestock and feral burros, and

trampling. The Service has determined that threatened rather than

endangered status is appropriate for these taxa primarily because the

FS has

[[Page 49018]]

initiated measures that afford some protection to Arenaria ursina,

Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum and the

State has taken measures to protect Trichostema austromontanum.

Management activities conducted by the FS (such as fencing, signing,

and monitoring various sensitive habitat areas) have reduced the

potential for habitat destruction by human activities to the degree

that the danger of extinction for these three taxa is not imminent.

Measures implemented by the State to obscure access routes to the only

known locality of, and delete references to Trichostema austromontanum

ssp. compactum in recreational literature afford this plant some

measure of protection. Alternatives to this action were considered but

not preferred because not listing these species would not provide

adequate protection and would not be consistent with the Act. In

addition, listing the species as endangered would not be appropriate

because the FS and the State of California have significantly decreased

the danger of extinction of these taxa at the present time.

Critical Habitat

Critical habitat is defined in section 3(5)(A) of the Act as: (i)

the specific areas within the geographical area occupied by a species,

at the time it is listed in accordance with the Act, on which are found

those physical or biological features (I) essential to the conservation

of the species and (II) that may require special management

considerations or protection; and (ii) specific areas outside the

geographical area occupied by a species at the time it is listed, upon

a determination that such areas are essential for the conservation of

the species. ``Conservation'' means the use of all methods and

procedures that are necessary to bring the species to the point at

which the measures provided pursuant to the Act are no longer

necessary.

Section 4(a)(3) of the Act, as amended, and implementing

regulations (50 CFR 424.12(a)) require that, to the maximum extent

prudent and determinable, the Secretary designate critical habitat

concurrently with determining a species to be endangered or threatened.

The Service finds that designation of critical habitat is not prudent

for these taxa at this time. Service regulations (50 CFR 424.12(a)(1))

state that designation of critical habitat is not prudent when one or

both of the following situations exist: (i) The species is threatened

by taking or other human activity, and identification of critical

habitat can be expected to increase the degree of such threat to the

species, or (ii) such designation of critical habitat would not be

beneficial to the species.

Designation of critical habitat would likely increase the threat

from vandalism, noted under Factor A. For the three pebble plain

species, Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi

var. austromontanum, the publication of precise maps and descriptions

of critical habitat in the Federal Register would make these species

more vulnerable to incidents of vandalism and, therefore, make recovery

more difficult and contribute to the decline of these species. Several

documented examples of a pattern of intentional destruction of pebble

plains and associated habitats have been cited under Factor A. The San

Bernardino National Forest has kept a record of repairs to fences

around most of the larger pebble plain sites since 1990 (Henderson in

litt. 1997). There is a record of persistent trespass into these fenced

areas which have been variously marked with signs stating ``Critical

Rare Plant Habitat. No Vehicles.'' (Neel and Barrows 1990). The

incidents recorded generally consist of entry following the cutting of

fence wires but include records of vehicle access, placement of ``rock

art,'' removal of fence wires and fence posts, and destruction of

signage (Henderson, in litt. 1997). These records indicate 40 such

incidents at the Sawmill pebble plain complex between 1990 and 1997. At

the north Baldwin Lake site these same records indicate 20 incidents of

wires having been cut during the period 1990 to 1996. Pebble plain

areas occasionally are associated with meadow sites containing several

sensitive plant species. A specific act of vandalism was directed at a

meadow-associated species following the release of location information

for populations of Sidalcea pedata, a federally listed species resulted

in a legal action suit (Krantz, in litt. 1993).

The threat of over-collection to the pebble plain and meadow taxa

is discussed under Factor B. Significant increases were seen in the

number of specimens in the collections in a large regional herbarium.

Specimens of Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi

var. austromontanum, as well as the meadow species Taraxacum

californicum and Poa atropurpurea, were increased subsequent to the

publication of two articles discussing these taxa and their unique

habitats (Wallace pers. obs. 1997). Of particular interest is the fact

that there was an increase in the numbers of collections of Poa

pratensis, commonly mistaken for Poa atropurpurea (Wallace pers. obs.

1997). Finally, there was an increase in the numbers of collections of

Taraxacum californicum while there was no increase in the numbers of

collections of the often associated introduced taxon T. officinale from

the same areas (Wallace pers. obs. 1997). The implication is that

collectors specifically sought out the rare T. californicum. It should

be noted that often additional specimens, beyond those housed by the

home institution, are collected for exchange with other institutions.

The listing of species as endangered or threatened publicizes their

rarity and may make them more susceptible to collection by researchers

or curiosity seekers (Mariah Steenson pers. comm. 1997). This would

likely be exacerbated by the publication of precise maps and

descriptions of critical habitat in the Federal Register. Dissemination

of sensitive site locations can encourage over-collection (M. Bosch, FS

in litt. 1997). The Service feels that publication of precise maps for

these species' locations (i.e., designation of critical habitat

boundaries), coupled with this final listing rule, would put these

species at further risk for over-collection by plant enthusiasts given

this well documented history of previous collections.

Enforcement problems could increase as a result of critical habitat

designation because frequent visits to many of the occurrences are not

possible due to funding constraints as well as the distances and

terrain involved (Neel and Barrows 1990). The meadow and pebble plain

habitats rely, in part, on particular hydrological conditions and, as a

consequence of the low visit frequency, remediation for incidents and

vandalism may be too late to prevent erosion, devegetation, and other

habitat alterations detrimental to the habitat and the species.

Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum, Taraxacum californicum and Poa atropurpurea occur on

Federal, State and private lands. The first three taxa are co-occurring

endemics found primarily on pebble plain complexes in the San

Bernardino Mountains. Private lands make up portions of four of the

eight pebble plain complexes that support Arenaria ursina. Private

lands make up all or portions of 5 of the 13 pebble plain complexes and

other areas that support Castilleja cinerea. Private lands that support

Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum are nearly all associated with

one, the Big Bear Lake

[[Page 49019]]

pebble plain complex, of the seven pebble plain complexes that support

this taxon. Private lands make up 8 of the 20 occurrences of Taraxacum

californicum in meadow areas of the San Bernardino Mountains. Private

lands make up all or portions of 7 of the 18 occurrences in the San

Bernardino, Laguna, and Palomar Mountains of the meadow associated

species Poa atropurpurea.

Designation of critical habitat would be of little benefit to

occurrences of these taxa on State and private lands. Any future

Federal involvement, such as through the permitting process or funding

by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Corps through section 404 of

the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Federal Department of Housing and Urban

Development or the Federal Highway Administration, would be subject to

consultation under section 7 of the Act (as amended). Federal

involvement, where it does occur, can be identified without the

designation of critical habitat because interagency coordination

requirements such as the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) and

section 7 of the Act are already in place. When these plant taxa are

listed, activities occurring on all lands under Federal jurisdiction or

ownership that may adversely affect these taxa would prompt the

requirement for consultation pursuant to section 7(a)(2) of the Act and

the implementing regulations pertaining thereto, regardless of whether

or not critical habitat has been designated. The FWCA, for example,

requires that any federally funded or permitted water resource

development proposal or project be consulted on with the Service and

State conservation agencies. Designating critical habitat would not

create a management plan for these plant species, or establish

numerical population goals for long-term survival of the species, nor

directly effect areas not designated as critical habitat.

Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum, Taraxacum californicum, and Poa atropurpurea occur on

the Baldwin Lake preserve which is administered by the CDFG. The CDFG

is aware of the occurrences of these taxa on this preserve and

currently conducts demographic monitoring of Sidalcea pedata and

Thelypodium stenopetalum, State and Federal listed taxa, at this site.

Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum occurs only in a

wilderness area on State lands with little potential for Federal

involvement. Trails, signage, map notations, and references to the

habitat area have been removed by the State to reduce impacts to this

highly localized taxon. Designation of critical habitat would have

little benefit to this taxon and would not increase the commitment or

management efforts of the State. In fact, designation of critical

habitat would likely be quite detrimental to this taxon. Publishing

maps and descriptions of the exact locality identifies the site as a

unique area which would likely encourage hikers and horseback riders to

investigate the vernal pool, the very site that the State has attempted

to protect by removing such map references and descriptions.

Four of the eight known occurrences of Arenaria ursina are

completely on Federal lands, as are portions of the other four

occurrences. Eight of the 13 known occurrences of Castilleja cinerea

are on Federal lands, along with portions of another 4. Six of the

eight known occurrences of Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum are

on Federal lands, while portions of two other occurrences are also on

Federal lands. Ten of the nearly 20 known occurrences of Taraxacum

californicum are on Federal lands as well as a portion of another. Nine

of the 18 known occurrences of Poa atropurpurea are on Federal lands

and portions of three other occurrences are also on Federal lands.

There would be no benefit from designating critical habitat for the

occurrences on FS (i.e. Federal) lands supporting the taxa noted above.

The FS is aware of the occurrences of this species on their lands. The

San Bernardino National Forest has developed a management plan for

pebble plain species including Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and

Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum. The FS actively conducts

management and monitoring activities that include these species and has

already fenced all of the larger pebble plain sites to protect them

from trespass, ORV use, and grazing. The two meadow taxa, Taraxacum

californicum and Poa atropurpurea are monitored to a lesser extent. The

San Bernardino National Forest consults with the Service under section

7 for activities related to other listed taxa in the area and would be

subject to similar requirements as a result of this listing.

Designation of critical habitat would not increase the commitment or

management efforts of the FS.

Section 7 of the Act requires that Federal agencies refrain from

contributing to the destruction or adverse modification of critical

habitat in any action authorized, funded or carried out by such agency

(agency action). This requirement is in addition to the section 7

prohibition against jeopardizing the continued existence of a listed

species, and it is the only mandatory legal consequence of a critical

habitat designation. Implementing regulations (50 CFR part 402.02)

define ``jeopardize the continuing existence of'' and ``destruction or

adverse modification of'' in very similar terms. To jeopardize the

continuing existence of a species means to engage in an action ``that

reasonably would be expected to reduce appreciably the likelihood of

both the survival and recovery of a listed species.'' Destruction or

adverse modification of habitat means an ``alteration that appreciably

diminishes the value of critical habitat for both the survival and

recovery of a listed species.'' Common to both definitions is an

appreciable detrimental effect to both the survival and the recovery of

a listed species. In the case of adverse modification of critical

habitat, the survival and recovery of the species has been appreciably

diminished by reducing the value to the species' designated critical

habitat. An action resulting in adverse modification may also

jeopardize the continued existence of the species concerned. Given the

limited range of Trichostema austromontanum ssp. compactum to a single

vernal pool, adverse modification of the habitat would likely

constitute jeopardy for the taxon.

The Service acknowledges that critical habitat designation, in some

situations, may provide some value to the species by identifying areas

important for species conservation and calling attention to those areas

in special need of protection. Critical habitat designation of

unoccupied habitat may also benefit these species by alerting

permitting agencies to potential sites for reintroduction and allowing

them the opportunity to evaluate proposals that may affect these areas.

However, in this case, the existing sites of the listed taxa herein are

currently known by the FS and State agencies. If future management

actions include unoccupied habitat, any benefit provided by designation

of such habitat as critical will be accomplished more effectively and

efficiently with the current coordination processes.

Taking of plants is regulated by the Act only in cases of--(1)

removal and reduction to possession of federally listed plants from

lands under Federal jurisdiction, or their malicious damage or

destruction on such lands; and (2) removal, cutting, digging-up, or

damaging or destroying in knowing violation of any State law or

regulation,

[[Page 49020]]

including State criminal trespass law. Designation of critical habitat

provides no additional benefits beyond those that these taxa would

receive by virtue of their listing as endangered or threatened species

and likely would increase the degree of threat from vandalism,

collecting, or other human activities. Protection of Arenaria ursina,

Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, Taraxacum

californicum, Poa atropurpurea, and Trichostema austromontanum ssp.

compactum will be most effectively addressed through the recovery

process under section 4 and the consultation process under section 7 of

the Act, and the current interagency coordination processes.

Given all of the above considerations, the Service finds that

designation of critical habitat for these taxa is not prudent because

the minimal benefit of such designation would be far outweighed by the

increase of threats from vandalism, over-collection, or other human

activities. All Federal and State agencies and local planning agencies

involved have been notified of the location and importance of

protecting habitat for these species.

Available Conservation Measures

Conservation measures provided to species listed as endangered or

threatened under the Act include recognition, recovery actions,

requirements for Federal protection, and prohibitions against certain

activities. Recognition through listing encourages public awareness and

results in conservation actions by Federal, State and local agencies,

private organizations and individuals. The Act provides for possible

land acquisition from willing sellers and cooperation with the States

and requires that recovery actions be carried out for all listed

species. The protection required of Federal agencies and the

prohibitions against certain activities involving listed plants are

discussed, in part, below.

Section 7(a) of the Act requires Federal agencies to evaluate their

actions with respect to any species that is proposed or listed as

endangered or threatened and with respect to its critical habitat, if

any is being designated. Regulations implementing this interagency

cooperation provision of the Act are codified at 50 CFR part 402.

Section 7(a)(2) requires Federal agencies to ensure that activities

they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to jeopardize the

continued existence of the species or destroy or adversely modify its

critical habitat. If a Federal action may affect a listed species or

its critical habitat, the responsible Federal agency must enter into

formal consultation with the Service.

Federal agencies expected to have involvement with section 7

regarding these species include the FS (through its management

activities associated with, for example, grazing permits and ORV

activity), and the Corps and the Environmental Protection Agency

through their permit authority under section 404 of the Clean Water

Act. The Federal Housing Administration may be affected through funding

of housing loans where these species or their habitat occurs. The

Federal Highway Administration may be affected through potential

funding associated with compensation measures relating to future

highway construction affecting these species. The Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission may be involved through its permitting authority

for utility projects that might potentially affect these taxa.

Five of the six plant taxa considered in this rule are found on

lands managed by the FS. The FS provides a measure of protection for

all of these taxa. Most areas of the Bear Valley are closed to fuelwood

cutting (SBNF, in litt. 1995). The closure or relocation of some roads

associated with fuelwood cutting sites, as well as those that traverse

pebble plain sites (Odell 1988) offers some measure of protection for

the plant taxa. Most of the larger pebble plain sites, which support

Arenaria ursina, Castilleja cinerea, and Eriogonum kennedyi var.

austromontanum, are protected by fencing to reduce or eliminate

incursions by vehicle and grazers/browsers. The FS monitors these

sites, records the type of fence damage and repairs the damage as soon

as possible. Completion of the implementation of the Big Bear Wild

Burro Management Plan will eliminate or significantly reduce impacts

from burro grazing, browsing, and trampling in most pebble plain and

meadow sites in the Big Bear Valley area, except Broom Flat.

The Act and its implementing regulations set forth a series of

general prohibitions and exceptions that apply to all endangered or

threatened plants. All prohibitions of section 9(a)(2) of the Act,

implemented by 50 CFR parts 17.61 (endangered plants) and 17.71

(threatened plants), apply. These prohibitions, in part, make it

illegal for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States

to import or export, transport in interstate or foreign commerce in the

course of a commercial activity, sell or offer for sale in interstate

or foreign commerce, or remove and reduce the species to possession the

species from areas under Federal jurisdiction. In addition, for plants

listed as endangered, the Act prohibits the malicious damage or

destruction on areas under Federal jurisdiction and the removal,

cutting, digging up, or damaging or destroying of such plants in

knowing violation of any State law or regulation, including State

criminal trespass law. Seeds from cultivated specimens of threatened

plants are exempt from these regulations provided that their containers

are marked ``Of Cultivated Origin.'' Certain exceptions to the

prohibitions apply to agents of the Service and State conservation

agencies.

It is the policy of the Service, published in the Federal Register

on July 1, 1994 (59 FR 34272), to increase public understanding of the

prohibited acts that will apply under section 9 of the Act. Arenaria

ursina, Castilleja cinerea, Eriogonum kennedyi var. austromontanum, Poa

atropurpurea, and Taraxacum californicum are known to occur on Federal

lands under the jurisdiction of the FS. Collection, damage or

destruction of listed species on Federal lands is prohibited, except as

authorized under section 7 or section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Act. Such

activities on non-Federal lands would constitute a violation of section

9 of the Act if activities were conducted in knowing violation of

California State law or regulation, or in violation of California State

criminal trespass law.

The Service believes that, based upon the best available

information, the following actions will not result in a violation of

section 9, provided these activities are carried out in accordance with

existing regulations and permit requirements:

(1) Activities authorized, funded, or carried out by Federal

agencies (e.g., grazing management, agricultural conversions, wetland

and riparian habitat modification, flood and erosion control,

residential development, recreational trail development, road

construction, hazardous material containment and cleanup activities,

prescribed burns, pesticide/herbicide application, pipelines or utility

lines crossing suitable habitat,) when such activity is conducted in

accordance with any reasonable and prudent measures given by the

Service in a consultation conducted under section 7 of the Act;

(2) Casual, dispersed human activities on foot or horseback (e.g.,

bird watching, sightseeing, photography, camping, hiking);

(3) Activities on private lands that do not require Federal

authorization and do not involve Federal funding, such as grazing

management, agricultural conversions, flood and erosion control,

[[Page 49021]]

residential development, road construction, and pesticide/herbicide

application when consistent with label restrictions;

(4) Residential landscape maintenance, including the clearing of

vegetation around one's personal residence as a fire break.

The Service believes that the following might potentially result in

a violation of section 9; however, possible violations are not limited

to these actions alone:

(1) Unauthorized collecting of the species on Federal lands;

(2) Application of herbicides violating label restrictions;

(3) Interstate or foreign commerce and import/export without

previously obtaining an appropriate permit. Permits to conduct

activities are available for purposes of scientific research and

enhancement of propagation or survival of the species.

Intentional collection, damage, or destruction on non-Federal lands

may be a violation of State law or regulations or in violation of State

criminal trespass law and therefore a violation of section 9. The Act

and 50 CFR 17.62, 17.63, and 17.72 provide for the issuance of permits

to carry out otherwise prohibited activities involving endangered or

threatened plant species under certain circumstances. Such permits are

available for scientific purposes and to enhance the propagation or

survival of the species. None of the taxa are currently known to be in

commercial trade. Intrastate commerce (commerce within the State) is

not prohibited under the Act. However, interstate and foreign commerce

(sale or offering for sale across State or international boundaries)

requires a Federal endangered species permit.

The Act and 50 CFR 17.62 and 17.63 for endangered plants and 17.72

for threatened plants provide for the issuance of permits to carry out

otherwise prohibited activities involving endangered and threatened

plants under certain circumstances. Such permits are available for

scientific purposes and to enhance the propagation or survival of the

species. For threatened plants, permits are also available for

botanical or horticultural exhibition, educational purposes, or special

purposes consistent with the purposes of the Act. It is anticipated

that few permits would ever be sought or issued because none of these

species are common in cultivation or common in the wild.

Questions regarding whether specific activities would constitute

violations of section 9 should be directed to the Field Supervisor of

the Service's Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES section). Requests

for copies of the regulations concerning listed plants (50 CFR 17.61

and 17.71) and general inquiries regarding prohibitions and permits may

be addressed to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological

Services, Endangered Species Permits, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, Portland,

Oregon, 97232-4181 (telephone 503/231-2063; facsimile 503/231-6243).

National Environmental Policy Act

The Service has determined that Environmental Assessments or

Environmental Impact Statements, as defined under the authority of the

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, need not be prepared in

connection with regulations adopted pursuant to section 4(a) of the

Act. A notice outlining the Service's reasons for this determination

was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR

49244).

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain any information collection requirements

for which the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval under the

Paperwork reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. is required. An

information collection related to the rule pertaining to permits for

endangered and threatened species has OMB approval and is assigned

clearance number 1018-0094. This rule does not alter that information

collection requirement. For additional information concerning permits

and associated requirements for threatened species, see 50 CFR 17.32.

References Cited

A complete list of all references cited herein is available upon

request from the Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES section).

Author. The primary authors of this document are Gary D. Wallace,

Ph.D., Carlsbad Field Office (see ADDRESSES section) and Edna Rey

Vizgirdas, Snake River Basin Field Office.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17

Endangered and threatened species, Exports, Imports, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.

Regulation Promulgation

Accordingly, the Service amends part 17, subchapter B of chapter I,

title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth below:

PART 17--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361-1407; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1544; 16 U.S.C.

4201-4245; Pub. L. 99-625, 100 Stat. 3500, unless otherwise noted.

2. Amend Sec. 17.12(h) by adding the following, in alphabetical

order under Flowering Plants, to the List of Endangered and Threatened

Plants, to read as follows:

Sec. 17.12 Endangered and threatened plants.

* * * * *

(h) * * *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Species

-------------------------------------------------------- Historic range Family Status When listed Critical Special

Scientific name Common name habitat rules

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Flowering Plants

* * * * * * *

Arenaria ursina.................. Bear Valley sandwort U.S.A.(CA)......... Caroyophyllaceae--P T 644 NA NA

ink.

* * * * * * *

Castilleja cinerea............... Ash-gray Indian U.S.A.(CA)......... Scrophulariaceae--F T 644 NA NA

paintbrush. igwort.

* * * * * * *

Eriogonum kennedyi var. Southern mountain U.S.A.(CA)......... Polygonaceae--Buckw T 644 NA NA

Austromontanum. wild buckwheat. heat.

[[Page 49022]]

* * * * * * *

Poa atropurpurea................. San Bernardino U.S.A.(CA)......... Poaceae--Grass..... E 644 NA NA

bluegrass.

* * * * * * *

Taraxacum californicum........... California taraxacum U.S.A.(CA)......... Asteraceae--Sunflow E 644 NA NA

er.

* * * * * * *

Trichostema austromontanum ssp. Hidden Lake U.S.A.(CA)......... Lamiaceae--Mint.... T 644 NA NA

compactum. bluecurls.

* * * * * * *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 1, 1998.

Jamie Rappaport Clark,

Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.

[FR Doc. 98-24502 Filed 9-11-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P