Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces

Federal RegisterAug 25, 1998

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SUMMARY: This proposed rule describes the types of discharges generated

incidental to the normal operation of Armed Forces vessels and

identifies which of these discharges the Armed Forces will be required

to control, and which vessel discharges will not require pollution

controls.

Today's proposal also addresses; the mechanism by which States can

petition EPA and DOD to review whether or not a discharge should

require control by a marine pollution control device (MPCD), or to

review a Federal performance standard for a MPCD; the effect on State

regulation of vessel discharges; and the processes to be followed by

EPA and States when establishing no-discharge zones (where any release

of a specified discharge is prohibited).

This is the first phase of a three-phased process to set uniform

national discharge standards (UNDS) for Armed Forces vessels. Phase I

will establish which types of discharges warrant control and which do

not, based on consideration of the anticipated environmental effects of

the discharge and other factors listed at section 312(n) of the Clean

Water Act. Phase II will promulgate MPCD performance standards, and

Phase III will specify requirements for the design, construction,

installation, and use of MPCDs.

Uniform national discharge standards will result in enhanced

environmental protection because standards will be established for

certain discharges that currently are not regulated comprehensively.

These standards will also advance the ability of the Armed Forces to

better design and build environmentally sound vessels, to train crews

to operate vessels in a manner that is protective of the environment,

and to maintain operational flexibility both domestically and

internationally. In addition, these standards are expected to stimulate

the development of innovative vessel pollution control technology.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received or postmarked by

October 9, 1998. For information on submitting comments on the draft

information collection request that was prepared for the proposed rule,

see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ``How to Submit Comments on the

Information Collection Request.''

ADDRESSES: Send written comments on the proposed rule to: Docket W-97-

21 UNDS Comment Clerk, Water Docket, Mail Code 4101, U.S. EPA, 401 M

Street SW., Washington, DC 20460. Please submit an original and three

copies of your comments and enclosures (including references). No

facsimiles (faxes) will be accepted. Commenters requesting

acknowledgment that their comments were received should enclose a self-

addressed stamped envelope with their comments. Comments may also be

filed electronically to [email protected]. Electronic comments must be

submitted as an ASCII or WordPerfect file avoiding the use of special

characters and any form of encryption. Electronic comments must be

identified by the docket number W-97-21 and may be filed online at many

Federal Depository Libraries.

The record for this proposed rulemaking has been established under

docket number W-97-21 and is available for review at the Office of

Water Docket, Room EB-57, 401 M Street SW., Washington, DC The record

is available for inspection from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through

Friday, excluding legal holidays. For access to docket materials,

please call (202) 260-3027 to schedule an appointment.

For information on how to obtain a copy of the Information

Collection Request (ICR) that has been prepared for this proposed rule,

or for information on where to submit comments on the draft ICR

document, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ``How to Submit Comments on the

Information Collection Request.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gregory Stapleton (U.S. EPA) at

(202) 260-0141, or Mr. David Kopack (U.S. Navy) at (703) 602-3594 ext.

243.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulated Entities

This proposed rule would apply to discharges incidental to the

normal operation of vessels of the Armed Forces, establish procedures

for States to petition EPA and DOD to review whether a discharge should

be controlled, and establish procedures for creating no-discharge zones

in State waters. Regulated categories and entities include:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Category Examples of regulated entities

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Government.................. Vessels of the Armed Forces,

including the Navy, Military

Sealift Command, Marine Corps,

Army, Air Force, and Coast Guard.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The preceding table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather

provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated

by this proposed action. This table lists the types of entities that

EPA and DOD are now aware could potentially be regulated by this

action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be

regulated. To determine whether a particular category of vessel,

discharge from a vessel, or governmental entity is regulated by this

proposed action, carefully examine the applicability criteria at

proposed 40 CFR 1700.1 in the regulatory text following this preamble.

For answers to questions regarding the applicability of this proposed

action to a particular entity, consult one of the persons listed in the

preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

Exclusions

This proposed rule would not apply to commercial vessels; private

vessels; vessels owned or operated by State, local, or tribal

governments; vessels under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of

Engineers; vessels, other than those of the Coast Guard, under the

jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation; vessels preserved as

memorials and museums; time- and voyage-chartered vessels; vessels

under construction; vessels in drydock; and amphibious vehicles.

Supporting Documentation

The technical basis for this proposed rule is detailed in the

``Technical Development Document for Proposed Phase I Uniform National

Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces'' (EPA-821-R-98-

009), hereafter referred to as the Technical Development Document. This

background document is available through EPA's Internet Home Page at

http://www.epa.gov/OST/rules, or through the UNDS Internet Home Page at

http://206.5.146.100/n45/doc/unds/unds.html. This document is also

available from the EPA Water Resource Center, Room EB-47, 401 M Street

SW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone (202) 260-7786 for the voice mail

publication request line.

[[Page 45299]]

How To Submit Comments on the Information Collection Request

An Information Collection Request (ICR) document has been prepared

by EPA (ICR No.1791.02, amending the collection with OMB control #2040-

0187) and a copy may be obtained from Sandy Farmer by mail at OPPE

Regulatory Information Division; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(2137); 401 M St., SW; Washington, DC 20460, by email at

[email protected], or by calling (202) 260-2740. A copy may

also be downloaded off the internet at http://www.epa.gov/icr.

Send comments on the ICR to the Director, OPPE Regulatory

Information Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2137), 401

M St., S.W., Washington, DC 20460, and to the Office of Information and

Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th St., NW,

Washington, DC 20503, marked ``Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.''

Include the ICR number in any correspondence. Since OMB is required to

make a decision concerning the ICR between 30 and 60 days after August

25, 1998, a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if

OMB receives it by September 24, 1998.

Overview

This preamble describes the legal authority, background, technical

basis, and other aspects of the proposed regulation. The definitions,

acronyms, and abbreviations used in this proposed rule are defined in

appendix A to the preamble. The regulatory text for this proposed rule

(40 CFR Part 1700) follows the preamble.

Organization of This Document

I. Purpose and Summary of This Rulemaking

A. Pollution Control Requirements for Vessel Discharges

B. Effect on State and Local Laws and Regulations

II. Legal Authority and Background

A. Clean Water Act Statutory Requirements

B. Summary of Public Outreach and Consultation With States and

Federal Agencies

III. Description of Armed Forces Vessels

A. U.S. Navy

B. Military Sealift Command (MSC)

C. U.S. Coast Guard

D. U.S. Army

E. U.S. Marine Corps

F. U.S. Air Force

G. Vessels Not Covered by This Proposed Rule

IV. Summary of Data Gathering Efforts

A. Surveys and Consultations

B. Sampling and Analysis

V. Marine Pollution Control Device (MPCD) Requirements

A. Overview of Assessment Methodology

B. Peer Review

C. Discharges Requiring the Use of a MPCD

D. Discharges That Do Not Require Use of a MPCD

VI. Section-By-Section Analysis of the Regulation

A. Subpart A--Scope

B. Subpart B--Discharge Determinations

C. Subpart C--Effect on States

D. Subpart D--MPCD Performance Standards

VII. Related Acts of Congress and Executive Orders

A. Executive Order 12866

B. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and Executive Order 12875

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act, as Amended by the Small Business

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

D. Paperwork Reduction Act

E. Executive Order 13045

F. Endangered Species Act

G. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

Appendix A to the Preamble--Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Other Terms

Used in This Document

I. Purpose and Summary of This Rulemaking

A. Pollution Control Requirements for Vessel Discharges

Today's document proposes to create a new 40 CFR Part 1700

establishing uniform national discharge standards that would apply to

discharges incidental to the normal operation of vessels of the Armed

Forces. Incidental discharges include effluent from the normal

operation of vessel systems or hull protective coatings, but do not

include such things as emergency discharges, air emissions, or

discharges of trash. These proposed regulations identify discharges

that would require control through the use of marine pollution control

devices (MPCDs). This document also identifies discharges that are

proposed to be excluded from any requirement for a marine pollution

control device because of their low potential for causing environmental

impacts.

This proposed rule addresses 39 types of discharges from Armed

Forces vessels. EPA and DOD are proposing to require the use of MPCDs

to control 25 of these discharges. These discharges are listed in Table

1 and described in section V.C of the preamble. Section V.C also

discusses whether and to what extent the discharges have the potential

to cause adverse impacts on the marine environment, the availability of

MPCDs to mitigate adverse impacts, and the rationale for proposing to

require the use of MPCDs.

Table 1.--Discharges Requiring Marine Pollution Control Devices

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aqueous Film-Forming Foam.

Catapult Water Brake Tank and Post-Launch Retraction Exhaust.

Chain Locker Effluent.

Clean Ballast.

Compensated Fuel Ballast.

Controllable Pitch Propeller Hydraulic Fluid.

Deck Runoff.

Dirty Ballast.

Distillation and Reverse Osmosis Brine.

Elevator Pit Effluent.

Firemain Systems.

Gas Turbine Water Wash.

Graywater.

Hull Coating Leachate.

Motor Gasoline Compensating Discharge.

Non-oily Machinery Wastewater.

Photographic Laboratory Drains.

Seawater Cooling Overboard Discharge.

Seawater Piping Biofouling Prevention.

Small Boat Engine Wet Exhaust.

Sonar Dome Discharge.

Submarine Bilgewater.

Surface Vessel Bilgewater/Oil-Water Separator Discharge.

Underwater Ship Husbandry.

Welldeck Discharges.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

For 14 types of vessel discharges, EPA and DOD have determined that

it is not reasonable and practicable to require the use of MPCDs

because these discharges, listed in Table 2, exhibit a low potential

for causing adverse impacts on the marine environment. Section V.D of

the preamble describes each of these discharges and the reasons why

MPCDs would not be required.

Table 2.--Discharges Exempted From Controls

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Boiler Blowdown.

Catapult Wet Accumulator Discharge.

Cathodic Protection.

Freshwater Lay-up.

Mine Countermeasures Equipment Lubrication.

Portable Damage Control Drain Pump Discharge.

Portable Damage Control Drain Pump Wet Exhaust.

Refrigeration/Air Conditioning Condensate.

Rudder Bearing Lubrication.

Steam Condensate.

Stern Tube Seals and Underwater Bearing Lubrication.

Submarine Acoustic Countermeasures Launcher Discharge.

Submarine Emergency Diesel Engine Wet Exhaust.

Submarine Outboard Equipment Grease and External Hydraulics.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Effect on State and Local Laws and Regulations

This proposed rule, identifying which vessel discharges require

control, is the first step of a three-phased process to establish

uniform national discharge

[[Page 45300]]

standards under section 312(n) of the Clean Water Act (CWA).

Establishing MPCD performance standards and promulgating regulations

governing the design and use of MPCDs will be accomplished in the

second and third phases of the UNDS process. The standards being

proposed today affect State and local laws and regulations in several

ways. Under section 312(n)(6) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), States and

their political subdivisions would be prohibited from adopting or

enforcing any State or local statute or regulation with respect to the

discharges listed in Table 2 once this proposed rule is in effect,

other than to establish no-discharge zones for these discharges. States

and their political subdivisions would be similarly prohibited from

adopting or enforcing any statutes or regulations affecting the

discharges listed in Table 1 once regulations governing MPCDs for those

discharges are in effect.

Second, this notice proposes the procedural mechanisms by which a

State can petition EPA and DOD to review whether a discharge should

require control by a MPCD. Finally, this proposed rule would codify the

process for establishing no-discharge zones (where any release of a

specified discharge is prohibited) where necessary to protect and

enhance the quality of some or all of the waters within a State. These

procedures, contained in proposed 40 CFR 1700.6 through 1700.13, are

discussed in section VI of this preamble.

II. Legal Authority and Background

A. Clean Water Act Statutory Requirements

Section 325 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 1996,

entitled ``Discharges from Vessels of the Armed Forces'' (Pub. L. 104-

106, 110 Stat. 254), amended section 312 of the Federal Water Pollution

Control Act (also known as the Clean Water Act, or CWA) to require the

Secretary of Defense (Secretary) and the Administrator of the United

States Environmental Protection Agency (Administrator) to develop

uniform national standards to control certain discharges from vessels

of the Armed Forces. Congress established requirements for the

development of uniform national discharge standards to (1) enhance the

operational flexibility of vessels of the Armed Forces domestically and

internationally, (2) stimulate the development of innovative vessel

pollution control technology, and (3) advance the development by the

U.S. Navy of environmentally sound ships. The term ``UNDS'' is used in

this preamble to refer to the provisions in section 312(n) of the CWA

(33 U.S.C. 1322(n)).

UNDS applies to vessels of the Armed Forces and discharges (other

than sewage) incidental to their normal operation, unless the Secretary

finds that compliance with UNDS would not be in the national security

interests of the United States (see CWA section 312(n)(1)). UNDS does

not apply to discharges overboard of rubbish, trash, garbage, or other

such materials; air emissions resulting from a vessel propulsion

system, motor driven equipment, or incinerator; or discharges that

require permitting under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System (NPDES) program, 40 CFR part 122 (see CWA section 312(a)(12)).

UNDS is applicable to discharges of Armed Forces vessels in the

navigable waters of the United States and the contiguous zone. As

defined in section 502(7) of the CWA, the term ``navigable waters''

means waters of the United States, including the Great Lakes, and

includes waters seaward from the coastline to a distance of 3 nautical

miles from the shore of the States, District of Columbia, Commonwealth

of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Canal

Zone, and the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands. The contiguous

zone extends from 3 nautical miles to 12 nautical miles from the

coastline. UNDS is not enforceable beyond the contiguous zone.

Although UNDS makes no changes to the regulation of sewage from

vessels, UNDS was patterned after provisions for the control of vessel

sewage discharges in the CWA (sections 312(a)--(m)). These provisions

require promulgation of Federal standards for performance of marine

sanitation devices, preemption of State regulation of marine sanitation

devices, and the opportunity to establish no-discharge zones (see CWA

sections 312(a)-(m) and 40 CFR part 140).

UNDS requires EPA and the Department of Defense (DOD) to develop

regulations and performance standards for controlling discharges

incidental to the normal operation of Armed Forces vessels where EPA

and DOD determine that it is reasonable and practicable to require use

of a marine pollution control device (MPCD) to mitigate adverse impacts

on the marine environment. The UNDS regulations are to be developed in

three phases:

Phase I: The first phase requires DOD and EPA to determine Armed

Forces vessel discharges for which it is reasonable and practicable to

require control with a MPCD to mitigate potential adverse impacts on

the marine environment (CWA section 312(n)(2)). The UNDS legislation

states that a MPCD may be a piece of equipment or a management practice

designed to control a particular discharge (CWA section 312(a)(13)).

DOD and EPA are required to consider seven factors in determining

whether a discharge requires a MPCD (CWA section 312(n)(2)(B)):

The nature of the discharge.

The environmental effects of the discharge.

The practicability of using the MPCD.

The effect that installing or using the MPCD has on the

operation or the operational capability of the vessel.

Applicable United States law.

Applicable international standards.

The economic costs of installing and using the MPCD.

The UNDS legislation requires DOD and EPA to consult with the

Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, the

Secretary of Commerce, and interested States in the Phase I rule

development. UNDS provides that after promulgation of the Phase I rule,

neither States nor political subdivisions of States may adopt or

enforce any State or local statutes or regulations with respect to

discharges identified as not requiring control with a MPCD, except to

establish no-discharge zones (CWA section 312(n)(6)).

Phase II: The second phase of UNDS requires DOD and EPA to

promulgate Federal performance standards for each MPCD determined to be

required in Phase I (CWA section 312(n)(3)). Phase II requires

consultation with the Secretary of the department in which the Coast

Guard is operating, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce,

other interested Federal agencies, and interested States. In developing

performance standards for the Phase II rulemaking, DOD and EPA are to

consider the same seven factors identified for Phase I, and can

establish standards that (1) distinguish among classes, types, and

sizes of vessels; (2) distinguish between new and existing vessels; and

(3) provide for a waiver of applicability of standards as necessary or

appropriate to a particular class, type, age, or size of vessel (CWA

section 312(n)(3)(C)). The mechanisms for determining compliance with

performance standards and the role of States and Federal agencies in

enforcement matters will be addressed during Phases II and III.

Phase III: The third phase requires DOD, in consultation with EPA

and the

[[Page 45301]]

Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, to

establish requirements for the design, construction, installation, and

use of the MPCDs identified in Phase II (CWA section 312(n)(4)). These

Phase III requirements will be codified under the authority of the

Secretary of Defense. Additional details regarding codification of

these requirements will be provided in Phase II. Following completion

of Phase III, neither States nor political subdivisions of States may

adopt or enforce any State or local statutes or regulations with

respect to discharges identified as requiring control with a MPCD,

except to establish no-discharge zones (CWA section 312(n)(6)).

UNDS provides for the establishment of no-discharge zones either by

State prohibition (CWA section 312(n)(7)(A)) or by EPA prohibition (CWA

section 312(n)(7)(B)). Today's proposal addresses the criteria and

procedures for establishing no-discharge zones. For a State

prohibition, if a State determines that the protection and enhancement

of the quality of some or all of its waters require greater

environmental protection, the State may prohibit one or more

discharges, whether treated or not, into those waters. However, the

statute provides that such a prohibition shall not be effective until

EPA determines that there are adequate facilities for the safe and

sanitary removal of the discharges(s), and that the prohibition will

not have the effect of discriminating against an Armed Forces vessel by

reason of the ownership or operation by the Federal Government, or the

military function, of the vessel.

For a no-discharge zone by EPA prohibition, a State may request EPA

to prohibit, by regulation, the discharge of one or more discharges,

whether treated or not, into specified waters within a State. In this

case, EPA makes the determination that the protection and enhancement

of the quality of the specified waters require a prohibition of the

discharge. As with a State prohibition, EPA must also determine that

there are adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal of the

discharge, and that the prohibition will not discriminate against Armed

Forces vessels by reason of their Federal ownership or operation, or

their military function. However, the statute directs that EPA shall

not disapprove an application for an EPA prohibition for the sole

reason that there are not adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary

removal of such discharges.

The UNDS legislation contains two provisions for reviewing and

modifying performance standards and determinations of whether a MPCD is

required. The first requires DOD and EPA to review the determinations

and standards every five years, and if necessary, revise them based on

any significant new information (CWA sections 312(n)(5)(A) and (B)).

The second provision allows States, at any time, to petition the

Secretary and the Administrator to review the determinations (after

Phase I) and standards (after Phase II) if there is significant new

information, not considered previously, that could reasonably result in

a change to the determination or standard (CWA section 312(n)(5)(D)).

B. Summary of Public Outreach and Consultation With States and Federal

Agencies

In developing this proposed rule, EPA and DOD have consulted with

other interested Federal agencies, States, and environmental

organizations. Other Federal agencies that have been involved in UNDS

development include the Coast Guard (for the Department of

Transportation), the Department of State, and the National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (for the Department of Commerce). The Coast

Guard has been involved in all aspects of UNDS development. The other

agencies have participated with the DOD, EPA, and the Coast Guard in

the UNDS Executive Steering Committee, which is responsible for UNDS

policy development and is composed of senior-level managers.

Separately, the DOD and EPA have held discussions with the U.S. Fish

and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service on UNDS

matters.

Two mechanisms have been used to consult with States. First, a

representative from the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS)

participates in Executive Steering Committee meetings. ECOS is the

national association of State and territorial environmental

commissioners and has been established, in part, to provide State

positions on environmental issues to EPA. Second, representatives from

the Navy (as the lead for the DOD), EPA, and the Coast Guard met at

least once, and in most cases twice, with each State expressing an

interest in the UNDS development. The interested States were

predominantly those with a significant presence of Navy or Coast Guard

vessels. The States participating in the consultation meetings are

identified in the Technical Development Document.

In early 1996, the Navy and EPA invited States with a DOD or Coast

Guard vessel presence to participate in an initial round of

consultation meetings. Of the approximately 40 States invited, 21

States requested a consultation meeting. These initial State

consultation meetings were held between August and December 1996. State

environmental regulatory authorities hosted each meeting, which

consisted of a Navy/EPA briefing on UNDS activities and an opportunity

to discuss State-specific issues. A Coast Guard representative was

present at each meeting to provide input on discharges from Coast Guard

vessels. The Navy/EPA briefing provided a summary of the UNDS history

and requirements, considerations for evaluating discharges, the

technical approach to determining which discharges will require

control, an overview of the vessels to which UNDS is applicable, and

the roles of DOD and EPA in the rulemaking process. See ``Uniform

National Discharge Standards (UNDS) State Consultation Meetings (Round

#1) Compendium of Minutes,'' available in the record for this proposed

rule.

The Navy and EPA conducted a second round of State consultation

meetings from October 1997 through January 1998. Of the 22 States

consulted in the second round of meetings, five were States that had

not been briefed during the initial round. The second round of

consultation meetings provided Navy and EPA an opportunity to summarize

the activities that had taken place since the initial round of

consultation meetings. This included discussing the 39 types of vessel

discharges covered by this proposed rule and the preliminary decisions

regarding which of the discharges would be proposed to require control.

States were provided information that included a description of the

discharges and the equipment or processes generating the discharges,

the locations where the discharges occur, vessels producing the

discharges, the preliminary results of environmental effects analyses,

and the preliminary conclusions of whether controls would be required.

States were generally supportive of the UNDS effort. States most

commonly expressed interest in matters related to the implementation of

UNDS regulations, including enforcement and procedures for establishing

no-discharge zones, the relationship between UNDS and other State

programs, which vessels are subject to UNDS, and discussions about

potential MPCD options.

In addition to State meetings, the Navy, EPA, and Coast Guard met

with several environmental organizations in December 1997 and May 1998.

Details

[[Page 45302]]

of the topics discussed and environmental organizations represented at

those meetings are in the record for this proposed rule. A compendium

of the minutes from the second round of State consultation meetings and

the meetings with environmental organizations is available in the

record for this proposed rule. See ``Uniform National Discharge

Standards (UNDS) Consultation Meetings (Round #2) Compendium of

Minutes.''

The Navy and EPA publish a newsletter that contains feature

articles on UNDS-related subjects (e.g., nonindigenous species, Navy

research and development programs), provides answers to frequently

asked questions, and provides an update on recent progress and upcoming

events. The newsletter is mailed to State and environmental group

representatives, Armed Forces and EPA contacts, and interested members

of the general public. The newsletter has a current circulation of 360

copies, approximately 200 of which are distributed outside of the EPA,

DOD, or their contractors. In addition, electronic copies of the

newsletter are available from an UNDS web site on the Internet (http://

206.5.146.100/n45/doc/unds/unds.html). In addition to the newsletter,

the Internet web site provides UNDS legislative information, a summary

of the technical and management approach to rule development, and a

description of the benefits expected to result from the development of

UNDS.

III. Description of Armed Forces Vessels

Section 312(a)(14) of the CWA, as amended by the National Defense

Authorization Act of 1996, defines a vessel of the Armed Forces as

``(A) any vessel owned or operated by the Department of Defense, other

than a time or voyage chartered vessel; and (B) any vessel owned or

operated by the Department of Transportation that is designated by the

Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating as a

vessel equivalent to a vessel [owned or operated by the DOD].'' The CWA

defines a vessel as every type of watercraft or other artificial

contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of

transportation on the navigable waters of the United States. See CWA

sections 312(a)(1) and 312(a)(2). Also see 40 CFR 140.1(d).

The scope of the UNDS legislation addresses incidental discharges

from over 7,000 vessels (i.e., ships, submarines, and small boats and

craft) of differing designs and mission requirements. The Armed Forces

that operate vessels subject to UNDS include the Navy, Military Sealift

Command, Army, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard. Table 3

summarizes the number of vessels operated by each of these branches of

the Armed Forces as of August 1997. The following sections provide a

general description of the mission of vessels operated by each branch

of the Armed Forces and the types of vessels covered by UNDS. Also

provided is a description of the vessels that are excluded from this

proposed rule. Armed Forces vessels and their operating locations are

discussed in more detail in the Technical Development Document.

Table 3.--Number of Armed Forces Vessels

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of

Branch of armed forces vessels

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Navy....................................................... 4,760

Military Sealift Command................................... 57

Army....................................................... 334

Marine Corps............................................... 538

Air Force.................................................. 36

Coast Guard................................................ 1,445

------------

Total.................................................. 7,172

------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. U.S. Navy

The role of the Navy is to maintain an effective naval fighting

force for the defense of the United States in times of war, and to

deploy this force to prevent conflicts and control crises around the

world. The Navy is responsible for organizing, training, and equipping

its forces to conduct prompt and sustained combat operations at sea.

The fleet must be capable of carrying personnel, weapons, and supplies

wherever needed.

The Navy currently owns and operates over 4,700 vessels. Navy

vessels can be categorized into eight groups by similar mission:

aircraft carriers, surface combatants, amphibious ships, submarines,

auxiliaries, mine warfare ships, service craft and small boats, and

inactive assets. Naval ships and submarines are ocean-going vessels

that for the most part operate within 12 nautical miles (n.m.) from

shore only during transit in and out of port. However, many of these

vessels spend approximately 180 days per year in port, and many testing

and maintenance activities are conducted in port or during transits.

Service craft and small boats typically operate in ports or other

coastal waters within 12 n.m. from shore. Unlike service craft, small

boats are often kept out of the water when not in use to increase the

vessels' longevity. Inactive assets include a variety of vessel types.

The majority of inactive vessels are scheduled for scrapping, transfer

to the Maritime Administration, or foreign sale. Table 4 provides a

brief description of the vessel types, and information on the number of

vessels and the vessels' primary operating areas.

The Navy bases the majority of its fleet at five major ports:

Norfolk, Virginia; San Diego, California; Mayport, Florida; Puget

Sound, Washington; and Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. These ports provide

services including: pierside support services (e.g., potable water,

sewage and trash disposal, and electrical power); supplies (e.g.,

repair parts, consumable materials, and food); and maintenance and

repair functions. The Navy operates additional ports, identified in the

Technical Development Document, that provide a subset of these

services.

Table 4.--U.S. Navy Vessels

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary operational

area

Vessel type Mission Number -----------------------

Inside 12 Outside 12

n.m. n.m.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aircraft Carriers......................... Provide air combat support to the 12 X

fleet with landing and launch

platforms for airplanes and

helicopters.

Surface Combatants........................ Provide air defense, ballistic 139 X

missile defense, antisubmarine

warfare support, antisurface

warfare support, merchant and

carrier group protection,

independent patrol operations,

and tactical support of land-

based forces.

[[Page 45303]]

Amphibious Ships.......................... Provide a landing and take-off 39 X X

platform for aircraft, primarily

helicopters, and a means for

launching and recovering smaller

landing craft.

Submarines................................ Provide strategic and ballistic 88 X

defense, search and rescue, and

research and survey capability.

Auxiliaries............................... Provide logistical support, such 20 X

as underway replenishment,

material support, and rescue and

salvage operations.

Mine Warfare Ships........................ Conduct minesweeping missions to 26 X

find, classify, and destroy

mines.

Service Craft and Small Boats............. Provide a variety of services. 4,192 X

Includes tug boats, landing

craft, training craft, torpedo

retrievers, patrol boats,

utility boats, floating

drydocks, barges, and transport

boats.

Inactive Assets........................... Vessels in various states of 244 X a

readiness, the majority of which

are scheduled for scrapping,

transfer to MARAD, or sale to

foreign nations.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a These vessels are not operated and are kept at various port locations

B. Military Sealift Command (MSC)

The primary mission of the MSC is to transport Department of

Defense materials and supplies, provide towing and salvage services,

and conduct specialized missions for Federal agencies. To accomplish

this, the MSC maintains and operates a fleet of vessels classified

within four major maritime programs: the Special Mission Support Force

(SMSF); the Naval Fleet Auxiliary Force (NFAF); the Afloat

Prepositioning Force; and MSC Strategic Sealift Program. MSC vessels

are operated primarily by civil service mariners, but also by some

military personnel or mariners under contract to MSC. UNDS does not

apply to chartered Strategic Sealift and Afloat Prepositioning Force

vessels. See CWA section 312(a)(14) excluding time or voyage chartered

vessels from the definition of vessels of the Armed Forces.

MSC vessels provide support to other Armed Forces vessels and can

be stationed around the globe to ensure rapid support. MSC vessels are

ocean-going vessels that typically operate within 12 n.m. only during

transit in and out of port. Some testing and maintenance activities are

conducted while the vessel is in port or during transits through

coastal waters. Table 5 provides a brief description of MSC vessel

types, and information on the number of vessels and their primary

operating areas.

The MSC operates no major port facilities of its own, instead

maintaining its vessels at Navy and commercial port facilities. A

number of MSC replenishment and auxiliary vessels operate out of the

Navy's ports in Norfolk, Virginia; San Diego, California; and Pearl

Harbor, Hawaii.

Table 5.--MSC Vessels

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary operational

area

Vessel type Mission Number ----------------------

Inside 12 Outside 12

n.m. n.m.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special Mission Support Force............. Support the Armed Forces in 22 X

specialized missions such as

undersea surveillance, missile

range tracking, oceanographic and

hydrographic surveys, acoustic

research, and submarine escort.

Naval Fleet Auxiliary Force............... Provide underway replenishment 35 X

services (i.e., deliver fuel,

food, spare parts, equipment, and

ammunition) to Navy surface

combatants, as well as ocean

towing and salvage services.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. U.S. Coast Guard

The Coast Guard is a component of the Department of Transportation

and is responsible for enforcing laws on waters of the U.S., including

coastal waters, oceans, lakes, and rivers subject to the jurisdiction

of the United States. Peacetime missions include enforcing recreational

boating safety, conducting search and rescue operations, maintaining

aids to navigation, ensuring merchant marine safety, providing drug

interdiction, and facilitating environmental protection efforts. In

time of war, the Coast Guard may become a part of the Navy.

Coast Guard vessels may be categorized as: icebreakers; cutters;

tenders; tugboats; small boats and craft; and other vessels. Table 6

provides a brief description of the vessel types, and information on

the number of vessels and their typical operating areas.

The major Coast Guard facilities are located in Boston,

Massachusetts; Honolulu, Hawaii; Charleston, South Carolina; Alameda,

California; Galveston, Texas; Seattle, Washington; Miami, Florida; and

Portsmouth, Virginia. Coast Guard duty stations can also be found on

inland, coastal, and river waterways throughout the U.S. Ship repair

and overhaul is usually conducted at a commercial facility near the

homeport of the vessel.

[[Page 45304]]

Table 6.--U.S. Coast Guard Vessels

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary operational

area

Vessel type Mission Number -----------------------

Inside 12 Outside 12

n.m. n.m.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ice breakers.............................. Support the winter icebreaking 3 X X

efforts in order to maintain

open waterways in the Arctic,

Antarctic, and the northern

regions of the United States

including the Great Lakes,

Northwest, and Northeast.

Cutters................................... Provide multi-mission capability, 128 X X

including patrol, air defense,

search and rescue, and drug

interdiction.

Tenders................................... Used to maintain inland river, 76 X

coastal, and offshore buoys and

navigational aids, or to serve

as a construction platform.

Tugboats.................................. Provide towing and support 20 X

services to other vessels.

Small Boats and Craft..................... Used in harbors, in rough surf 1,217 X

for rescue, for inland river and

lake patrol, as transports, and

for firefighting.

Other Vessel.............................. Includes a sailing cutter used 1 X

for training.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. U.S. Army

Army vessels are used primarily for ship-to-shore transfer of

equipment, cargo, and personnel. The Army operates one major port

facility at Fort Eustis, Virginia for active duty vessels, and numerous

other port facilities for reserve duty vessels. The Army's fleet is

divided into three categories: the Transportation Corps, the

Intelligence and Security Command, and the Corps of Engineers. The Army

Transportation Corps operates lighterage and floating utility craft to

provide waterborne delivery (inland and ship-to-shore) of equipment and

supplies for all Armed Forces and to perform port terminal operations.

The Intelligence and Security Command operates patrol vessels for drug

interdiction. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) boats and craft are

excluded from UNDS as discussed in section III.G of the preamble. Table

7 provides a brief description of Army vessels subject to the proposed

rule, and information on the number of vessels and their primary

operating areas.

Table 7.--U.S. Army Vessels

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary operational

area

Vessel type Mission Number -----------------------

Inside 12 Outside 12

n.m. n.m.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lighterage................................ Transport equipment, cargo, and 159 X X

personnel.

Floating Utility.......................... Perform port terminal operations. 168 X

Patrol Ships.............................. Perform drug interdiction........ 7 X

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

E. U.S. Marine Corps

A primary role of the Marine Corps is to employ military forces and

equipment onto land from the sea. The Marine Corps uses 538 inflatable

rubber craft for in-port, river, lake, and coastal operations. These

craft are often kept out of the water when not in use to increase the

craft's longevity. The Marine Corps makes use of available local port

facilities and operates no major port facilities of its own.

F. U.S. Air Force

The Air Force operates some large vessels and a number of smaller

boats and craft at various locations to support missile testing and

operations. Table 8 provides a brief description of the vessel types,

and information on the number of vessels and their primary operating

areas.

The Air Force operates no major port facilities of its own. The

larger Air Force vessels are located at Tyndall Air Force Base,

Florida, and at Carrabelle, Florida. Small boats and craft are

distributed among a number of local ports.

Table 8.--U.S. Air Force Vessels

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary operational

area

Vessel type Mission Number -----------------------

Inside 12 Outside 12

n.m. n.m.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Missile Retriever......................... Used to locate and recover 5 X X

practice missiles.

Floating Utility.......................... Used primarily for 31 X

transportation, training, and

repair.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

G. Vessels Not Covered by This Proposed Rule

This proposed rule would apply only to Armed Forces vessels. This

proposed rule would not apply to commercial vessels; privately owned

vessels; vessels owned or operated by State, local, or tribal

governments; vessels under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of

Engineers; vessels, other than those of the Coast Guard, under the

jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation; vessels owned or

operated by other Federal agencies that are not part of the Armed

Forces; vessels preserved as

[[Page 45305]]

memorials and museums; time- and voyage-chartered vessels; vessels

under construction; vessels in drydock; and amphibious vehicles. For

clarification, several categories of these types of vessels that are

beyond the scope of this proposed rule are described below.

1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Vessels

Army Corps of Engineers vessels are typically used for civil works

purposes. Congress has consistently addressed the Army Corps of

Engineers separately from other parts of the Department of Defense in

both authorization and appropriations bills. Therefore, the DOD and EPA

do not consider that Congress intended to apply UNDS to Army Corps of

Engineers vessels.

2. Maritime Administration (MARAD) Vessels

A number of vessels are operated or maintained by the Maritime

Administration, a part of the Department of Transportation. As

established in section 312(a)(14) of the CWA, the definition of

``vessel of the Armed Forces'' includes those Department of

Transportation vessels that are designated by the Secretary of the

department in which the U.S. Coast Guard is operating (currently the

Department of Transportation) as operating as a vessel equivalent to a

DOD vessel. The Secretary of Transportation has determined that MARAD

vessels, including the National Defense Reserve Fleet, do not operate

equivalently to DOD vessels, and therefore MARAD vessels are not

covered by UNDS.

3. Memorial and Museum Vessels

Ships and submarines preserved as memorials and museums once served

a military mission. However, with the exception of one submarine, these

vessels are no longer owned or operated by the Armed Forces, and

therefore, they are not vessels of the Armed Forces and UNDS does not

apply to them.

The submarine Nautilus is owned and operated by the Navy as a

museum; however, the vessel is stationary and its systems are not

routinely operated. Therefore, the EPA and DOD are proposing to exclude

this vessel from the scope of UNDS.

4. Time- and Voyage-Chartered Vessels

CWA section 312(a)(14) specifically excludes time or voyage

chartered vessels from the definition of ``vessels of the Armed

Forces.'' Time- and voyage-chartered vessels are vessels operating

under a contract between the vessel owner and a charterer (in this

case, the Armed Forces) whereby the charterer hires the vessel for a

specified time period or voyage, respectively. Such vessels at all

times remain manned and navigated by the owner, and they are not owned

and operated by the Armed Forces. Examples of chartered vessels are

those operated by the MSC in the Afloat Prepositioning Force and the

Strategic Sealift Program.

5. Vessels Under Construction

EPA and DOD do not consider a vessel under construction for the DOD

or Coast Guard, and for which the Federal government has not taken

custody, to be a ``vessel of the Armed Forces.'' UNDS would not apply

to these vessels until the Federal government gains custody.

6. Vessels in Drydock

The statutory definition of ``discharge incidental to the normal

operation of a vessel'' includes incidental discharges whenever the

vessel is waterborne. See CWA section 312(a)(12). UNDS would not apply

to discharges from vessels while they are in drydock because they are

not waterborne, even if the discharges would otherwise meet the

definition of a ``discharge incidental to the normal operation of a

vessel.''

7. Amphibious Vehicles

EPA and DOD do not consider amphibious vehicles as a vessel for the

purposes of UNDS because they are operated primarily as vehicles on

land. Water use of these vehicles is of short duration for nearshore

transit to and from vessels.

IV. Summary of Data Gathering Efforts

Once the scope of vessels to which UNDS would apply was determined,

it was necessary to identify the universe of discharges and to

characterize the nature of these discharges. The data gathering effort

to support these objectives included surveys and consultations

involving DOD and Coast Guard personnel with expertise in vessel

operations and shipboard systems or equipment generating the

discharges. The survey and consultation results were supplemented with

sampling, where necessary. The following sections provide an overview

of the data collection efforts. Additional details are presented in the

Technical Development Document.

A. Surveys and Consultations

The Navy initiated the data collection process by compiling a list

of discharges and existing information on these discharges, including

summary results of previous sampling studies. The information was

presented in a single report, ``U.S. Navy Ship Wastewater Discharges,''

available in the record for this proposed rule. The Navy provided this

report, along with a survey, to each branch of the Armed Forces at the

headquarters and field levels, including both shore installations and

shipboard operators. The survey solicited comments on the accuracy and

completeness of the attached report, and sought information on which

vessels generate the discharges, discharge characteristics (e.g.,

pollutant constituents, discharge volumes, and flow rates), and any

existing reports or documentation relating to any discharges not

identified in the report.

The Navy and EPA supplemented the survey results by conducting ship

visits and consulting with DOD and Coast Guard personnel with expertise

in vessel systems, equipment, and operations that produce the

discharges. The purpose of these consultations and ship visits was to

clarify information gathered and to ensure all existing information on

discharges was obtained.

B. Sampling and Analysis

As a result of the survey and consultation process, EPA and DOD

identified 39 types of discharges incidental to the normal operation of

Armed Forces vessels. For 30 of the 39 discharges, existing information

gathered from surveys and consultations was sufficient to characterize

the nature of the discharges and assess potential environmental

impacts, if any, resulting from the discharges. EPA and DOD determined

that existing information was insufficient to characterize the

constituents and determine the environmental effects of the remaining

nine discharges. These nine discharges, identified in Table 9, were

sampled to obtain the additional data.

Table 9.--Discharges Sampled

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

--Boiler Blowdown.

--Compensated Fuel Ballast.

--Distillation and Reverse Osmosis Brine.

--Firemain Systems.

--Freshwater Lay-up

--Non-Oily Machinery Wastewater.

--Seawater Cooling Overboard Discharge.

--Steam Condensate.

--Surface Vessel Bilgewater/Oil-Water Separator Discharge.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Samples were collected from ten vessels, representing a total of

six Navy, Coast Guard, and MSC vessel types. Navy vessels sampled

included an aircraft carrier, three surface combatants, two amphibious

ships, and a submarine. Also sampled were a Coast Guard cutter and two

MSC oilers, which are vessels used for fuel transport. The

[[Page 45306]]

sampling program was structured to address differences in wastestream

characteristics among certain vessel types. Information on the

discharges that were sampled from each ship and the constituents

analyzed for each discharge is presented in the Technical Development

Document. The technical basis for selecting the constituents analyzed

and the reasons for sampling specific discharges on certain ship

classes are presented in the document entitled ``Uniform National

Discharge Standards Rationale for Initial Discharge Sampling.'' Both

documents are available in the record for this proposed rule.

V. Marine Pollution Control Device (MPCD) Requirements

CWA section 312(n)(2)(B) identifies the seven factors EPA and DOD

are to consider in determining for which discharges it is reasonable

and practicable to require use of a MPCD to mitigate adverse impacts on

the marine environment. Those factors are listed in section II.A of

this preamble. The methodology EPA and DOD used to assess the

environmental effects, if any, resulting from each of the discharges is

presented in section V.A below.

This proposed rule would apply to 39 types of vessel discharges.

EPA and DOD are proposing to require the use of MPCDs to control 25 of

these discharges. These discharges are listed in Table 1 and described

below in section V.C. Section V.C also discusses the potential for the

discharges to cause adverse impacts on the marine environment and the

availability of MPCDs to mitigate adverse impacts. The MPCDs mentioned

below in sections V.C may not be uniformly applicable to all vessels.

The performance standards to be promulgated in a future rulemaking

(UNDS Phase II) may distinguish among classes, types, and sizes of

vessels; distinguish between new and existing vessels; and provide for

a waiver of applicability for a particular class, type, age or size of

vessel. (See CWA section 312(n)(3)C).)

EPA and DOD are proposing not to require the use of MPCDs for the

remaining 14 vessel discharges. These discharges, listed in Table 2 and

described below in section V.D, exhibit a low potential for causing

adverse impacts on the marine environment. Therefore, EPA and DOD have

determined, for this proposed rule, that it is not reasonable and

practicable to require the use of MPCDs to mitigate adverse impacts on

the marine environment.

A. Overview of Assessment Methodology

For the purposes of this proposed rule, EPA and DOD assessed the

potential environmental effects of the discharges by asking the

following questions concerning their chemical, physical, and biological

characteristics:

--Chemical Constituents. Does the discharge contain constituents in

concentrations that exceed State aquatic water quality criteria or

Federal aquatic water quality criteria (as promulgated by EPA in the

National Toxics Rule, 40 CFR 131.36) and have the potential to be

released into the environment in significant amounts, resulting in a

potential adverse impact on the environment?

--Thermal Pollution. Does the discharge pose the potential to exceed

State thermal water quality criteria in the receiving waters beyond a

mixing zone, and to a degree sufficient to have an adverse impact on

the environment?

--Bioaccumulative Chemicals of Concern. Does the discharge have the

potential to contain bioaccumulative chemicals of concern in amounts

sufficient to have an adverse impact on the environment?

--Nonindigenous Species. Does the discharge have the potential to

introduce viable nonindigenous aquatic species to new locations?

If the answer to any of the above questions was ``yes,'' EPA and

DOD determined that the discharge had a potential for adverse

environmental effect.

EPA and DOD used sampling results or process knowledge to identify

the potential presence and concentration of constituents in the

discharge. Constituent concentrations in the discharge were compared to

Federal criteria promulgated by EPA in its National Toxics Rule, 40 CFR

131.36 (57 FR 60848; Dec. 22, 1992 and 60 FR 22230; May 4, 1995),

referred to in this preamble as ``Federal criteria,'' and State water

quality numeric criteria for the ten States with the most significant

presence of Armed Forces vessels. These ten States are California,

Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, New Jersey, South Carolina,

Texas, Virginia, and Washington. Constituent concentrations in the

discharge were compared against the most stringent of the Federal and

ten States' criteria for that constituent. For almost all constituents,

the State water quality criteria are more stringent than the Federal

National Toxics Rule (NTR) criteria.

EPA and DOD used aquatic water quality criteria in this assessment

because they are a measure of the level of water quality that provides

for the protection and propagation of aquatic life.

EPA and DOD used saltwater aquatic life criteria for screening the

discharges because most Armed Forces vessels operate in the brackish

water of estuaries or bays, or in the marine environment off the coast

or in open ocean, where the biology of the water body is dominated by

saltwater aquatic life. Aquatic life criteria were used instead of

human health criteria, which are related to consumption of fish and

shellfish, because recreational activities such as fishing and swimming

generally do not occur in the immediate vicinity of Armed Forces

vessels.

Depending on the nature of the discharge, EPA and DOD compared

discharge concentrations to either the acute or chronic criteria

values. Where discharges are intermittent or occasional in nature, of

relatively short duration (a few seconds to a few hours), and dissipate

rapidly in the environment, constituent concentrations were compared to

acute water quality criteria. Where discharges are of a longer duration

or continuous and likely to result in concentrations in the environment

that approach a steady state condition, the constituent concentrations

were compared to chronic water quality criteria. Table 4-1 in the

Technical Development Document lists the State criteria or Federal

criteria used.

The initial screening process involved comparing the constituent

concentrations in the undiluted discharge to the water quality

criteria. For those discharges, such as cathodic protection, where the

constituents diffuse from the exterior of a vessel or vessel component,

EPA and DOD generally computed a concentration within a small mixing

zone (a few inches to a few feet).

EPA and DOD further assessed those discharges that had constituents

exceeding water quality criteria. EPA and DOD considered mass loadings,

flow rates, the geographic location of the discharge, the manner in

which the discharge occurs (e.g., continuous or intermittent), and in

some cases, the effect of the dilution within a small mixing zone. The

purpose of this further assessment was to determine whether the

constituents are discharged with such a low frequency or in such small

amounts that the resulting constituent mass loading has the potential

to produce only minor or undetectable environmental effects, or whether

the constituents are released in such a manner that dilution in a small

mixing

[[Page 45307]]

zone quickly results in concentrations below water quality criteria. If

so, EPA and DOD considered the chemical constituents of the discharge

not to have the potential to adversely affect the environment.

In addition to chemical constituents, EPA and DOD assessed whether

the discharges exceeded State thermal water quality criteria for the

five States with the most significant presence of Armed Forces vessels.

These States are California, Florida, Hawaii, Virginia, and Washington.

Many discharges did not need a detailed assessment because they are

discharged at ambient or only slightly elevated temperatures, or the

volume or discharge rate is very low. EPA and DOD determined that six

discharges are released at sufficiently high temperatures and volumes

that further assessment was warranted to determine whether the

discharge had the potential to cause an adverse thermal effect. These

discharges are:

--Boiler Blowdown,

--Catapult Water Brake Tank And Post-Launch Retraction Exhaust,

--Catapult Wet Accumulator Discharge,

--Distillation And Reverse Osmosis Brine,

--Seawater Cooling Overboard Discharge, and

--Steam Condensate.

EPA and DOD modeled these discharges to determine the size of the

mixing zone that would be needed for receiving waters to meet State

thermal water quality criteria and compared this zone to State thermal

mixing zone allowances. A more complete discussion of the models and

procedures used for these assessments is provided in the Technical

Development Document.

EPA and DOD reviewed each discharge to determine whether it

contained bioaccumulative chemicals of concern, as identified in the

Final Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System (60 FR 15365;

March 23, 1995). This guidance contains a list of bioaccumulative

chemicals of concern identified after scientific study, in a process

subjected to public notice and comment, designed to support a

regionally uniform set of standards applicable to the waters of the

Great Lakes. Table 4-1 of the Technical Development Document lists

these bioaccumulative chemicals of concern. In every case where the

presence of a bioaccumulative chemical of concern was confirmed in a

discharge, EPA and DOD had already determined based on other

information that it was reasonable and practicable to require control

of that discharge.

EPA and DOD also assessed each discharge for its potential to

transport viable living aquatic organisms between naturally isolated

water bodies. Preventing the introduction of invasive nonindigenous

aquatic species has been recognized as important in maintaining

biodiversity, water quality, and the designated uses of water bodies.

If the available data indicate that a discharge has a potential for

transporting and then subsequently discharging viable aquatic organisms

into waters of the U.S., then EPA and DOD considered the discharge to

present a potential for causing adverse environmental effects from

nonindigenous species introduction. In some cases EPA and DOD

determined it was reasonable and practicable to require MPCDs to

control a discharge even though information in the record indicates

that the discharge has a low potential for adversely affecting the

environment. For the chain locker effluent and sonar dome discharges,

at least one class of Armed Forces vessel has a management practice or

control technology already in place to control the environmental

effects of the discharge. EPA and DOD considered the existence of a

currently applied management practice or control technology to be

sufficient indication that it was reasonable and practicable to require

a MPCD. In other cases (non-oily machinery wastewater and photographic

laboratory drains), analysis of whether the discharge had a potential

to adversely affect the environment was inconclusive. However, EPA and

DOD determined that it was reasonable and practicable to require an

MPCD to mitigate possible adverse environmental effects from the

discharge.

For each discharge that was determined to have the potential to

adversely affect the environment, EPA and DOD conducted an initial

evaluation of the practicability, operational impact, and economic cost

of using a MPCD to control each discharge. EPA and DOD first determined

whether a control technology or management practice is currently in

place to control the discharge for environmental protection on any

vessel type. The use of existing controls on a vessel was considered

sufficient demonstration that at least one reasonable and practicable

control is available for at least one vessel type. (This proposed Phase

I UNDS rule does not address whether existing control technologies or

management practices are adequate to mitigate potential adverse

impacts. In Phase II of UNDS, EPA and DOD will promulgate MPCD

performance standards for the discharges requiring control.) For

discharges without any existing pollution controls, EPA and DOD

analyzed potential pollution control options to determine whether it is

reasonable and practicable to require the use of MPCDs. For every

discharge that was found to have a potential to cause adverse

environmental effects, EPA and DOD determined that it is reasonable and

practicable to require a MPCD for at least one vessel type. The results

of the MPCD assessments are presented in the Technical Development

Document.

B. Peer Review

Peer review is a documented critical review of a scientific and

technical work product. It is an in-depth assessment that is used to

ensure that the final work product is technically sound. Peer reviews

are conducted by qualified individuals who are independent of those who

prepared the work product. For this proposed rule, reviewers were

selected because of their technical expertise in assessing pollutant

behavior in coastal and estuarine ecosystems, modeling pollutant

concentrations, and predicting the effects of pollutant loadings on

ambient water quality, sediments, and biota.

A technical report was prepared for each of the discharges covered

by this proposed rule. These Nature of Discharge (NOD) reports include

a discussion of how the discharge is generated, discharge volumes and

frequencies, where the discharge occurs, chemical constituents present

in the discharge, and relevant regulatory information or water quality

criteria. The NOD reports also assess the potential for a discharge to

cause an adverse environmental effect, and provide the process and

environmental background information used in determining whether a

particular discharge warrants control. NOD reports for each discharge

are included as an appendix to the Technical Development Document.

NOD reports for five discharges were selected for peer review. For

each of these discharges, EPA and DOD determined that it is not

reasonable and practicable to require the use of MPCDs because they

exhibit a low potential for causing adverse impacts on the marine

environment. Peer reviewers were asked whether the data and process

information presented in the NOD reports are sufficient to characterize

the discharges; whether the analyses are appropriate for the

discharges; and whether the conclusions regarding the discharges'

potential for causing adverse environmental impacts are supported by

[[Page 45308]]

the information presented in the NOD reports.

Results of the peer review are compiled in the ``Peer Review

Comments Document for Nature of Discharge Reports'' and are available

for review in the rulemaking record. An initial assessment of the

comments does not indicate any fundamental flaws in the methodology

used by EPA and DOD to assess a discharge's potential to cause adverse

impacts on the marine environment. EPA and DOD will address the peer

review comments prior to promulgating the final Phase I rule.

C. Discharges Requiring the Use of a MPCD

For the reasons discussed below, EPA and DOD have initially

determined that it is reasonable and practicable to require the use of

a MPCD to control 25 discharges from vessels of the Armed Forces.

Except where noted, the pollutant characteristics of these discharges

indicate a potential to cause adverse environmental impacts. Table 10

lists those discharges for which EPA and DOD determined it was

reasonable and practicable to require the use of a MCPD, and identifies

the characteristics of each discharge that formed the basis of the

determination. The terms ``Chemical Constituents,'' ``Thermal

Pollution,'' ``Bioaccumulative Chemicals of Concern'' and

``Nonindigenous Species'' refer to the four questions described in

section V.A.

Table 10.--Discharges Requiring the Use of a MPCD and the Basis for the Determination.a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chemical constituents

------------------------------------------ Thermal Bioaccumulative Nonindigenous

Discharge Organic pollution chemicals of species Other

Oil Metals Chemicals concern

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aqueous Film-Forming Foam......................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............... ............. (b)

Catapult Water Brake Tank Discharge & Post-Launch

Retraction Exhaust............................... X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

Chain Locker Effluent............................. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. (c)

Clean Ballast..................................... ............ ............ ............ ............ X ............

Compensated Fuel Ballast.......................... X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

Controllable Pitch Propeller Hydraulic Fluid...... X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

Deck Runoff....................................... X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

Dirty Ballast..................................... X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

Distillation and Reverse Osmosis Brine............ ............ X ............ ............ ............. ............

Elevator Pit Overboard Discharge.................. X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

Firemain Systems.................................. ............ X ............ ............ ............. ............

Gas Turbine Washdown Discharge.................... X ............ X ............ ............. ............

Graywater......................................... ............ ............ X ............ ............. ............

Hull Coating Leachate............................. ............ X ............ ............ ............. ............

Motor Gasoline Compensated Overboard Discharge.... X ............ ............ ............ X ............

Non-oily Machinery Wastewater..................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. (d)

Photographic Laboratory Drains.................... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. (d)

Seawater Cooling Overboard Discharge.............. ............ X ............ X ............. ............

Seawater Piping Biofouling Prevention............. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. (e)

Small Boat Engine Wet.............................

Exhaust........................................... ............ ............ X ............ ............. ............

Sonar Dome Discharge.............................. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............. (c)

Submarine Bilge Water............................. X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

Surface Vessel Bilge Water/Oil-Water Separator....

Discharges........................................ X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

Underwater Ship Husbandry......................... ............ X ............ ............ X ............

Welldeck Discharges............................... X ............ ............ ............ ............. ............

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes:

(a) This table provides a simplified overview of the basis for requiring the use of MPCDs for particular discharges. It is not intended to fully

characterize the discharges or describe the analyses leading to the decision. More complete characterizations of the discharges and the analyses

leading to the decisions are presented in section V.C. and in the appendices of the Technical Development Document.

(b) Discharge may produce floating foam in violation of some State water quality standards.

(c) Discharge was determined to have a low potential to adversely affect the environment, but an existing MPCD is in place on at least one type of

vessel to reduce this low potential even further.

(d) No conclusion was drawn on the potential of the discharge to adversely affect the environment, but EPA and DOD determined a MPCD is reasonable and

practicable to mitigate any possible adverse effects.

(e) Chlorine and chlorination byproducts.

For this Phase I proposed rule, EPA and DOD identified at least one

potential MPCD control option for each discharge that could mitigate

the environmental impacts of the discharge from at least one class of

Armed Forces vessel. In Phase II of the UNDS rulemaking, EPA and DOD

will perform a more detailed assessment of MPCD control options. EPA

and DOD will consider options that are being evaluated as part of

research and development programs in addition to those that are

currently available. EPA and DOD will evaluate MPCDs for all classes of

vessels and promulgate the specific performance standards for each MPCD

that are reasonable and practicable for that class of vessel. In

developing specific MPCD performance standards, EPA and DOD will

consider the same factors considered in Phase I. The Phase II rule may

distinguish among vessel types and sizes, between new and existing

vessels, and may waive the applicability of Phase II standards as

necessary or appropriate to a particular type or age of vessel (see CWA

section 312(n)(3)(B)).

[[Page 45309]]

The definition of a marine pollution control device, or MPCD, as

used in this proposed rule is a control technology or a management

practice that can reasonably and practicably be installed or otherwise

used on a vessel of the Armed Forces to receive, retain, treat, control

or discharge a discharge incidental to the normal operation of the

vessel.

The discussions below provide a brief description of the discharges

and the systems that produce the discharges EPA and DOD propose to

control. The discussions highlight the most significant constituents

released to the environment, and describes the current practice, if

any, to prevent or minimize environmental effects. Because of the

diversity of vessel types and designs, these control practices are

usually not uniformly applied to all vessels generating the discharge.

In addition, these controls do not necessarily represent the only

control options available. The discharges are described in more detail

in Appendix A of the Technical Development Document.

1. Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)

This discharge consists of a mixture of seawater and firefighting

foam discharged during training, testing, and maintenance operations.

Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) is the primary firefighting agent used

to extinguish flammable liquid fires on surface ships of the Armed

Forces. AFFF is stored on vessels as a concentrated liquid that is

mixed with seawater to create the diluted solution (3-6% AFFF) that is

sprayed as a foam on the fire. The solution is applied with both fire

hoses and fixed sprinkler devices. During planned maintenance of

firefighting systems, system testing and inspections, and flight deck

certifications, the seawater/foam solution is discharged either

directly overboard from hoses, or onto flight decks and then

subsequently washed overboard. These discharges are considered

incidental to the normal operation of Armed Forces vessels. Discharges

of AFFF that occur during firefighting or other shipboard emergency

situations are not incidental to normal operations and are not subject

to the requirements of this proposed rule.

AFFF is discharged from all Navy ships, those MSC ships capable of

supporting helicopter operations, and Coast Guard cutters, icebreakers,

and tugs. AFFF discharges generally occur at distances greater than 12

n.m. from shore, and in all cases more than 3 n.m. from shore due to

existing Armed Forces operating instructions. The constituents of AFFF

include water, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)-ethanol,

urea, alkyl sulfate salts, amphoteric fluoroalkylamide derivative,

perfluoroalkyl sulfonate salts, triethanolamine, and methyl-1H-

benzotriazole. Because the water used to mix with the AFFF concentrate

comes from the vessel's firemain, the discharge will also include

nitrogen (measured as total Kjeldahl nitrogen), copper, nickel, and

iron from the firemain piping.

The AFFF discharge produces an aqueous foam intended to cool and

smother fires. Water quality criteria for some States include narrative

requirements for waters to be free of floating materials attributable

to domestic, industrial, or other controllable sources, or include

narrative criteria prohibiting discharges of foam. AFFF discharges in

State waters would be expected to result in violating such narrative

criteria for foam or floating materials. At present, the Navy uses

certain management practices to control these discharges, including a

self-imposed prohibition on AFFF discharges in coastal waters by most

Armed Forces vessels. These management practices to control discharges

of AFFF demonstrate the availability of a MPCD to mitigate the

potential adverse impacts that could result from the discharge of AFFF.

Therefore, EPA and DOD have determined that it is reasonable and

practicable to require use of a MPCD for this discharge.

AFFF discharges occur beyond 3 n.m. but within 12 n.m. from shore

infrequently and in relatively small volumes, and the diluted (3-6%)

AFFF solution is not believed to exhibit significant toxic effects.

Further, any discharges that do occur take place while the vessel is

underway and will be dispersed in the turbulence of the vessel wake.

2. Catapult Water Brake Tank and Post-Launch Retraction Exhaust

This intermittent discharge is the oily water skimmed from the

catapult water brake tank, and the condensed steam discharged when the

catapult is retracted. Catapult water brakes are used to stop the

forward movement of the steam-propelled catapults used to launch

aircraft from Navy aircraft carriers. The catapult water brake system

includes a water brake tank that contains freshwater, and water brake

cylinders . During flight operations, water from the catapult water

brake tank is continuously injected into the catapult water brake

cylinders. At the end of a launch stroke, spears located on the front

of the catapult pistons enter the water brake cylinders. The water in

the cylinders builds pressure ahead of the spears, cushioning the

catapult pistons to a stop. The catapult brake water is continuously

circulated between the catapult water brake tank and the catapult water

brake cylinders.

Prior to the launch stroke, lubricating oil is applied to the

catapult cylinder through which the catapult piston and piston spear

are driven. As the catapult piston is driven forward during the launch

stroke, the catapult piston and spear carries lubricating oil from the

catapult cylinder into the water brake cylinder at the end of the

stroke. Over the course of multiple launchings, the oil and water

circulating through the water brake cylinder and tank leads to the

formation of an oil layer in the water brake tank. The oil layer can

adversely affect water brake operation by interfering with the cooling

of water in the water brake tank. To prevent excessive heat buildup in

the tank, the oil is periodically skimmed off and discharged overboard.

Additionally, as the catapult piston is retracted following the launch,

expended steam from the catapult launch stroke and some residual

lubricating oil from the catapult cylinder walls are discharged below

the waterline through a separate exhaust pipe.

Only aircraft carriers generate this discharge. Catapult operations

during normal flight operations generate both the water brake tank

discharge and the post-launch retraction exhaust; however, flight

operations take place beyond 12 n.m. from shore. Catapult testing which

occurs within 12 n.m. always discharges the post-launch retraction

exhaust, but usually does not add sufficient quantities of oil to the

water brake tank to require skimming.

The water brake tank is used within 12 n.m. for dead-load catapult

shots when testing catapults on new aircraft carriers, and following

major drydock overhauls or major catapult modifications. This testing

requires a minimum of 60 dead-load shots each and may occur over a

period of several days within 12 n.m. from shore. New carrier testing

occurs only once, and major overhauls generally occur on 5- to 7-year

cycles in conjunction with drydocking. Major modifications to catapults

may occur during an overhaul or pierside and are also infrequent

events. Carriers also routinely perform no-load shots when leaving

port. The number of no-load shots conducted when leaving port, however,

usually do not add enough lubricating oil to the water brake tank to

require skimming the oil while the ship is within 12 n.m. from shore.

[[Page 45310]]

The water brake tank and post-launch retraction exhaust discharges

include lubricating oil, a limited thermal load associated with the

heated oil and water (or condensed steam, in the case of the post-

launch retraction exhaust), nitrogen (in the form of ammonia, nitrates

and nitrites, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen), and metals such as copper

and nickel from the piping systems. EPA and DOD analyzed the thermal

effects of this discharge and concluded they were unlikely to exceed

thermal mixing zone criteria in the States where aircraft carriers most

frequently operate. The post-launch retraction exhaust discharge can

contain oil, copper, lead, nickel, ammonia, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,

phosphorus, and benzidine in concentrations exceeding State acute water

quality criteria. The post-launch retraction exhaust discharge can also

contain nitrogen in concentrations exceeding the most stringent State

water quality criteria.

The Navy has imposed operational controls limiting the amount of

oil applied to the catapult cylinder during the launch stroke, which

directly affects the amount of oil that is subsequently discharged from

the water brake tank or during the post-launch retraction exhaust. The

Navy has also established requirements dictating when catapult testing

is required within 12 n.m. from shore. These operational constraints

minimize discharges of oil from the water brake tank and post-launch

retraction exhaust in coastal waters. These existing management

practices demonstrate the availability of controls for this discharge.

Therefore, EPA and DOD have determined that it is reasonable and

practicable to require use of a MPCD to mitigate potential adverse

environmental impacts from this discharge.

3. Chain Locker Effluent

This discharge consists of accumulated precipitation and seawater

that is occasionally emptied from the compartment used to store the

vessel's anchor chain.

The chain locker is a compartment used to store anchor chain aboard

vessels. Navy policy requires that the anchor chain, appendages, and

anchor on Navy surface vessels be washed down with seawater during

retrieval to prevent onboard accumulation of sediment. During washdown,

some water adheres to the chain and is brought into the chain locker as

the chain is stored. The chain locker sump accumulates the residual

water and debris that drains from the chain following anchor chain

washdown and retrieval, or washes into the chain locker during heavy

weather. Water accumulating in the chain locker sump is removed by a

drainage eductor powered by the shipboard firemain system.

All Armed Forces vessels housing their anchor chains in lockers,

except submarines, can generate this discharge. Since submarine chain

lockers are always open to the sea, water is always present in the

chain locker and there is no ``collected'' water to be discharged as

effluent. Navy policy prohibits discharging chain locker effluent

within 12 n.m. Other vessels of the Armed Forces are currently

authorized to discharge chain locker effluent within 12 n.m.; however,

most Armed Forces vessels also observe the 12 n.m. discharge

prohibition. A recent review of practices on several Navy ships found

no water accumulation in the chain locker sump, and the ships' crew

confirmed that discharges of chain locker effluent occur outside 12

n.m.

In addition to water, materials collecting in the chain locker sump

can include paint chips, rust, grease, and other debris. Chain locker

effluent may contain organic and inorganic compounds associated with

this debris, as well as metals from the sump and from sacrificial

anodes installed in the chain locker to provide cathodic protection. If

the anchor chain washdown is not performed and the chain locker

effluent is subsequently discharged in a different port, the discharge

could potentially transport nonindigenous species. Discharge volume

will vary depending upon the frequency of anchoring operations, the

number of anchors used, and the depth of water (which determines the

amount of chain that will be lowered into the water).

Given the manner in which water collects in the chain locker sump

and remains there for extended periods of time, it is possible that the

discharge could contain elevated levels of metals at concentrations

exceeding State water quality criteria. However, given the small volume

of the discharge and the infrequency of anchoring operations, it is

unlikely that discharges of chain locker effluent would adversely

impact the environment. Nevertheless, the Navy and other Armed Forces

already have management practices in place for most vessels requiring

anchors and anchor chains to be washed down with seawater during

retrieval, and prohibiting the discharge of chain locker effluent until

beyond 12 n.m. from shore. DOD has chosen as a matter of policy to

continue prohibiting the discharge of chain locker effluent within 12

n.m. from shore. This prohibition, while not considered necessary to

mitigate an existing or potential adverse impact, will eliminate the

possibility of discharging into coastal waters any metals, other

contaminants, or nonindigenous aquatic species that may have

accumulated in the chain locker sump. EPA and DOD have determined that

the existing management practices demonstrate that it is reasonable and

practicable to require use of a MPCD for chain locker effluent.

4. Clean Ballast

This discharge is composed of the seawater taken into, and

discharged from, dedicated ballast tanks used to maintain the stability

of the vessel and to adjust the buoyancy of submarines.

Many types of Armed Forces vessels store clean ballast in dedicated

tanks in order to adjust a vessel's draft, buoyancy, trim, and list.

Clean ballast may consist of seawater taken directly onboard into the

ballast tanks or seawater received from the vessel's firemain system.

Clean ballast differs from ``dirty ballast'' and ``compensated

ballast'' discharges (described below) in that clean ballast is not

stored in tanks that are also used to hold fuel. Many surface vessels

introduce clean ballast into tanks to replace the weight of off-loaded

cargo or expended fuel to improve vessel stability while navigating on

the high seas. Amphibious ships also flood clean ballast tanks during

landing craft operations to lower the ship's stern, allowing the well

deck to be accessed. Submarines introduce clean ballast into their main

ballast tanks when submerging, and introduce clean ballast into their

variable ballast tanks to make minor adjustments to buoyancy, trim, and

list while operating submerged or surfaced. The discharge occurs when

fuel or cargo is taken on and the ballast is no longer needed, when

amphibious operations are concluded and the vessel is returned to its

normal operating draft, when submarines surface, or when submarines

make some operational adjustments in trim or list while submerged or

surfaced.

Clean ballast discharges are intermittent and can occur at any

distance from shore, including within 12 n.m. Constituents of clean

ballast can include materials from tank coatings (e.g., epoxy),

chemical additives (e.g., flocculant chemicals or rust inhibitors), and

metals from piping systems and sacrificial anodes used to control

corrosion. Based on analytical data for firemain system discharges,

metals expected to be present in the discharge include copper, nickel,

and zinc. These data indicate that the pollutant

[[Page 45311]]

concentrations in the discharge may exceed State water quality

criteria.

Previous studies have documented the potential of ballasting

operations to transfer nonindigenous aquatic species into receiving

waters. Ballast water potentially contains living microorganisms,

plants, and animals that are native to the location where the water was

pumped aboard. When the ballast water is transported to another port or

coastal area and discharged, the surviving organisms are released and

have the potential to invade and impact the local ecosystem.

The Navy, MSC, and Coast Guard either currently implement or are in

the process of approving a ballast water management policy requiring

open-ocean ballast water exchange, based on guidelines established by

the International Maritime Organization (Guidelines for Preventing the

Introduction of Unwanted Aquatic Organisms and Pathogens from Ships'

Ballast Water and Sediment Discharge, 10 May 1995). These management

practices demonstrate the availability of controls to mitigate the

potential adverse environmental impacts from this discharge. Therefore,

EPA and DOD have determined that it is reasonable and practicable to

require a MPCD for discharges of clean ballast.

5. Compensated Fuel Ballast

This intermittent discharge is composed of the seawater taken into,

and discharged from, tanks designed to hold both fuel and ballast water

to maintain the stability of the vessel.

Compensated fuel ballast systems are configured as a series of fuel

tanks that automatically draw in seawater to replace fuel as it is

consumed. Keeping the fuel tanks full in this manner enhances the

stability of a vessel by using the weight of the seawater to compensate

for the mass of ballast lost through fuel consumption. During

refueling, fuel displaces the seawater, and the displaced seawater is

discharged overboard.

Compensated fuel ballast is discharged by approximately 165 Navy

surface vessels and submarines. Surface ships with compensated fuel

ballast systems discharge directly to surface waters each time they

refuel. Surface vessels are refueled both inport and at sea. All at-sea

refueling is accomplished beyond 12 n.m. from shore. For submarines,

refueling occurs only in port and the compensated ballast is

transferred to shore facilities for treatment and disposal.

The compensated fuel ballast discharge can contain acrolein,

phosphorus, thallium, oil (and its constituents, such as benzene,

phenol, and toluene), copper, mercury (a bioaccumulative chemical of

concern), nickel, silver, and zinc. Concentrations of acrolein,

benzene, copper, nickel, silver, and zinc can exceed acute Federal

criteria or State acute water quality criteria. The compensated fuel

ballast discharge can also contain nitrogen (in the form of ammonia,

nitrates and nitrites, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen) in concentrations

exceeding the most stringent State water quality criteria.

To reduce the discharge of fuel in compensated fuel ballast

discharge, the Navy has instituted operational guidelines intended to

reduce the potential for overfilling tanks or discharging excessive

amounts of fuel entrained in the displaced compensating water while

refueling surface vessels. These guidelines limit the amount of fuel

that can be taken on in port (i.e., to prevent ``topping off'' the fuel

tanks) and establish maximum allowable rates for inport refueling.

Additionally, submarines transfer all compensated fuel ballast water to

shore facilities when refueling diesel fuel oil tanks. These

operational controls for surface vessel refueling and the practice of

transferring the discharge to shore for submarines demonstrates the

availability of MPCDs to mitigate potential adverse environmental

impacts; therefore, EPA and DOD have determined it is reasonable and

practicable to require the use of a MPCD for compensated fuel ballast.

6. Controllable Pitch Propeller Hydraulic Fluid

This discharge is the hydraulic fluid that discharges into the

surrounding seawater from propeller seals as part of normal operation,

and the hydraulic fluid released during routine maintenance of the

propellers.

Controllable pitch propellers (CPP) are used to control a vessel's

speed or direction while maintaining constant propulsion plant output

(i.e., varying the pitch, or ``bite,'' of the propeller blades allows

the propulsion shaft to remain turning at a constant speed). CPP blade

pitch is controlled hydraulically through a system of pumps, pistons,

and gears. Hydraulic oil may be released from CPP assemblies under

three conditions: leakage through CPP seals, releases during underwater

CPP repair and maintenance activities, or releases from equipment used

for CPP blade replacement.

Over 200 Armed Forces vessels have CPP systems. Leakage through CPP

seals can occur within 12 n.m., but seal leakage is more likely to

occur while the vessel is underway than while pierside or at anchor

because the CPP system operates under higher pressure when a vessel is

underway. Blade replacement occurs inport on an as-needed basis when

dry-docking is unavailable or impractical, resulting in some discharge

of hydraulic oil. Approximately 30 blade replacements and blade port

cover removals (for maintenance) are conducted annually, fleetwide.

CPP assemblies are designed to operate at 400 psi without leaking.

Typical pressures while pierside range from 6 to 8 psi. CPP seals are

designed to last five to seven years, which is the longest period

between dry-dock cycles, and are inspected quarterly to check for

damage or excessive wear. Because of the hub design and the frequent

CPP seal inspections, leaks of hydraulic oil from CPP hubs are expected

to be negligible. During the procedure for CPP blade replacement,

however, hydraulic oil is released to the environment from tools and

other equipment. In addition, hydraulic oil could also leak from the

CPP hub during a CPP blade port cover removal.

The Navy's repair procedures impose certain requirements during

blade replacement and blade port cover removal to minimize the amount

of hydraulic oil released to the extent possible. In addition, booms

are placed around the aft end of the vessel to contain possible oil

release during these procedures. Nevertheless, EPA and DOD believe that

the amount of hydraulic oil released during underwater CPP maintenance

could create an oil sheen and exceed State water quality criteria.

Constituents of the discharge could include paraffins, olefins, and

metals such as copper, aluminum, tin, nickel, and lead. Metal

concentrations are expected to be low because hydraulic oil is not

corrosive, and the hydraulic oil is continually filtered to protect

against system failures.

EPA and DOD have determined that pollution controls are necessary

to mitigate the potential adverse environmental impacts that could

result from releases of hydraulic oil during underwater maintenance on

controllable pitch propellers. The existing repair procedures and the

staging of containment booms and oil skimming equipment to capture

released oil demonstrate the availability of MPCDs (i.e., best

management practices) for this discharge. Therefore, EPA and DOD have

determined that it is reasonable and practicable to require MPCDs to

control discharges of CPP hydraulic fluid.

[[Page 45312]]

17. Deck Runoff

Deck runoff is an intermittent discharge generated when water from

precipitation, freshwater washdowns, or seawater falls on the exposed

portion of a vessel such as a weather deck or flight deck. This water

is discharged overboard through deck openings and washes overboard any

residues that may be present on the deck surface. The runoff drains

overboard to receiving waters through numerous deck openings. All

vessels of the Armed Forces produce deck runoff, and this discharge

occurs whenever the deck surface is exposed to water, both within and

beyond 12 n.m.

Contaminants present on the deck originate from topside equipment

components and the many varied activities that take place on the deck.

This discharge can include residues of gasoline, diesel fuel, Naval

distillate fuel, grease, hydraulic fluid, soot, dirt, paint, glycol,

cleaners such as sodium metasilicates, and solvents. A number of metal

and organic pollutants may be present in the discharge, including

silver, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, benzene, ethylbenzene,

toluene, xylene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and phenol. Mass

loadings and concentrations of these constituents will vary with a

number of factors including ship operations, deck washdown frequency,

and the frequency, duration, and intensity of precipitation events.

Based on the results from limited sampling from catapult troughs (a

component of runoff from aircraft carrier flight decks), oil and

grease, phenols, chromium, cadmium, nickel, and lead could be present

in this discharge at levels exceeding acute Federal criteria and State

acute water quality criteria. If not properly controlled, oil

collecting in catapult troughs can cause deck runoff from aircraft

carrier flight decks to create an oil sheen on the surface of the

receiving water, which would violate State water quality criteria.

Armed Forces vessels already institute certain management practices

intended to reduce the amount of pollutants discharged in deck runoff,

including keeping weather decks cleared of debris, immediately mopping

up and cleaning spills and residues, and engaging in spill prevention

practices. These practices demonstrate the availability of controls to

mitigate adverse impacts from deck runoff. Therefore, EPA and DOD have

determined it is reasonable and practicable to require a MPCD for deck

runoff.

8. Dirty Ballast

This intermittent discharge is composed of the seawater taken into,

and discharged from, empty fuel tanks to maintain the stability of the

vessel. The seawater is brought into these tanks for the purpose of

improving the stability of a vessel during rough sea conditions. Prior

to taking on the seawater as ballast, fuel in the tank to be ballasted

is transferred to another fuel tank or holding tank to prevent

contaminating the fuel with seawater. Some residual fuel remains in the

tank and mixes with the seawater to form dirty ballast. Dirty ballast

systems are configured differently from compensated ballast and clean

ballast systems. Compensated ballast systems continuously replace fuel

with seawater in a system of tanks as the fuel is consumed. Clean

ballast systems have tanks that carry only ballast water and are never

in contact with fuel. In a dirty ballast system, water is added to a

fuel tank after most of the fuel is removed.

Thirty Coast Guard vessels generate dirty ballast as a discharge

incidental to normal vessel operations. These Coast Guard vessels do so

because their size and design do not allow for a sufficient volume of

clean ballast tanks. The larger of these vessels discharge the dirty

ballast at distances beyond 12 n.m. from shore, while the smaller

vessels are cutters that discharge the dirty ballast between 3 and 12

n.m. from shore. Coast Guard vessels monitor the dirty ballast

discharge with an oil content monitor. If the dirty ballast exceeds 15

ppm oil, it is treated in an oil-water separator prior to discharge.

Expected constituents of dirty ballast are Naval distillate fuel or

aviation fuel. Based on sampling results for compensated fuel ballast,

which is expected to have similar constituents to dirty ballast, this

discharge can contain oil (and its constituents such as benzene and

toluene); biocidal fuel additives; metals such as copper, mercury (a

bioaccumulative chemical of concern), nickel, silver, and zinc; and the

pollutants acrolein, nitrogen (in the form of ammonia and total

Kjeldahl nitrogen), and phosphorus.

Uncontrolled discharges of dirty ballast would be expected to

exceed acute Federal criteria or State acute water quality criteria for

oil, benzene, phenol, copper, nickel, silver, and zinc. Concentrations

of nitrogen would be expected to exceed the most stringent State water

quality criteria. The use of oil content monitors and oil-water

separators to reduce the concentration of oil (and associated

constituents) demonstrates the availability of MPCDs to control this

discharge. Therefore, EPA and DOD have determined that it is reasonable

and practicable to require the use of MPCDs to control discharges of

dirty ballast.

9. Distillation and Reverse Osmosis Brine

This intermittent discharge is the concentrated seawater (brine)

produced as a byproduct of the processes used to generate freshwater

from seawater.

Distillation and reverse osmosis plants are two types of water

purification systems that generate freshwater from seawater for a

variety of shipboard applications, including potable water for drinking

and hotel services, and high-purity feedwater for boilers. Distillation

plants boil seawater, and the resulting steam is condensed into high-

purity distilled water. The remaining seawater concentrate, or

``brine,'' that is not evaporated is discharged overboard. Reverse

osmosis systems separate freshwater from seawater using semi-permeable

membranes as a physical barrier, allowing a portion of the seawater to

pass through the membrane as freshwater and concentrating the suspended

and dissolved constituents in a saltwater brine that is subsequently

discharged overboard.

Distillation or reverse osmosis systems are installed on

approximately 540 Armed Forces vessels. This discharge can occur in

port, while transiting to or from port, or while operating anywhere at

sea (including within 12 n.m.). Distillation plants on steam-powered

vessels may be operated to produce boiler feedwater any time a vessel's

boilers are operating; however, operational policy limits its use in

port for producing potable water because of the increased risk of

biofouling from the water in harbors and the reduced demand for potable

water. MSC steam-powered vessels typically operate one evaporator while

in port to produce boiler feedwater; most diesel and gas-turbine

powered MSC vessels do not operate water purification systems within 12

n.m.

Pollutants detected in distillation and reverse osmosis brine

include copper, iron, lead, nickel, selenium, and zinc. The sampling

data indicate that copper, lead, nickel and iron can exceed acute

Federal criteria and State acute water quality criteria. The

distillation and reverse osmosis brine discharge can also contain

nitrogen (in the form of ammonia) and phosphorus in concentrations

exceeding the most stringent State water quality criteria. The mass

loadings of copper and iron are estimated to be significant. Thermal

[[Page 45313]]

effects modeling of distillation plant discharges indicates that the

thermal plume does not exceed State water quality criteria.

Review of existing practices indicate that certain operational

controls limiting the use of distillation plants and reverse osmosis

units can reduce the potential for this discharge to cause adverse

environmental impacts in some instances. Additionally, it appears that,

for some vessels, reverse osmosis units may present an acceptable

alternative to the use of distillation plants. Reverse osmosis units

discharge brines are expected to contain lower concentrations of metals

because these systems have non-metallic membranes and ambient operating

temperatures, resulting in less system corrosion. Further analysis is

necessary before determining whether distillation plants should be

replaced by reverse osmosis units. Nevertheless, existing operational

practices for distillation and reverse osmosis plants and the

availability of reverse osmosis units to replace distillation units on

some vessels demonstrates the availability of MPCDs to reduce the

effects of this discharge. Therefore, EPA and DOD have determined that

it is reasonable and practicable to require MPCD controls for

discharges of distillation plant and reverse osmosis brines.

10. Elevator Pit Effluent

This discharge is the liquid that accumulates in, and is

occasionally discharged from, the sumps of elevator wells on vessels.

Most large surface ships have at least one type of elevator used to

transport supplies, equipment, and personnel between different decks of

the vessel. These elevators generally can be classified as either a

closed design in which the elevator operates in a shaft, or an open

design used to move aircraft between decks. Elevators operating in a

shaft are similar to the conventional design seen in many buildings.

For these elevators, a sump is located in the elevator pit to collect

liquids entering the elevator and shaft areas. Deck runoff and elevator

equipment maintenance activities are the primary sources of liquids

entering the sump. On some vessels, the elevator sump is equipped with

a drain to direct liquid wastes overboard. On others, piping is

installed that allows an eductor to pump the pit effluent overboard.

However, most vessels collect and containerize the pit effluent for

disposal onshore or process it along with their bilgewater.

The elevators used on aircraft carriers to move aircraft and

helicopters from one deck to another are an open design (i.e., there is

no elevator shaft). The elevator platform is supported by cables and

pulleys, and it operates on either the port or starboard side of the

ship away from the hull. Unlike elevators with pits, the aircraft

elevators are exposed to the water below and there are no systems in

place for collecting liquid wastes.

Coast Guard, Army and Air Force vessels do not have elevators and

therefore do not produce this discharge. The discharge of elevator pit

effluent may occur at any location, within or beyond 12 n.m. from

shore. Constituents in elevator pit effluent are likely to include

grease, lubricating oil, fuel, hydraulic fluid, cleaning solvents,

dirt, paint chips, aqueous film forming foam, glycol, and sodium

metasilicate. The discharge can also contain nitrogen (measured as

total Kjeldahl nitrogen) and metals from firemain water used to operate

eductors draining the elevator pit.

The concentrations of copper, nickel, and bis(2-

ethylhexyl)phthalate in firemain water (discussed below in section

V.C.11) may exceed acute Federal criteria or State acute water quality

criteria. The elevator pit effluent discharge can also contain nitrogen

in concentrations exceeding the most stringent State water quality

criteria. Constituent concentrations and mass loadings vary among ship

classes depending on the frequency of elevator use, the size of the

elevator openings, the amount and concentration of deck runoff, and the

frequency of elevator equipment maintenance activities. Material

accumulated in elevator pits is either collected for disposal onshore

or directed to the bilgewater system for treatment through an oil-water

separator prior to discharge. These existing practices demonstrate the

availability of controls to reduce the potential for this discharge to

cause adverse impacts on the environment. Therefore, EPA and DOD have

determined that it is reasonable and practicable to require MPCDs for

elevator pit effluent.

11. Firemain Systems

This discharge is the seawater pumped through the firemain system

for firemain testing, maintenance, and training, and to supply water

for the operation of certain vessel systems.

Firemain systems distribute seawater for firefighting and other

services aboard ship. Firemain water is provided for firefighting

through fire hose stations, sprinkler systems, and foam proportioners,

which inject aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) into firemain water for

distribution over flammable liquid spills or fire. Firemain water is

also directed to other services including ballast systems, machinery

cooling, lubrication, and anchor chain washdown. Discharges of firemain

water incidental to normal vessel operations include anchor chain

washdown, firemain testing, various maintenance and training

activities, bypass flow from the firemain pumps to prevent overheating,

and cooling of auxiliary machinery equipment (e.g., refrigeration

plants). UNDS does not apply to discharges of firemain water that occur

during firefighting or other shipboard emergency situations because

they are not incidental to the normal operation of a vessel.

Firemain systems aboard Armed Forces vessels are classified as

either wet or dry. Wet firemain systems are continuously charged with

water and pressurized so that the system is available to provide water

upon demand. Dry firemains are not continuously charged with water, and

consequently do not supply water upon demand. Dry firemain systems are

periodically tested and are pressurized during maintenance or training

exercises, or during actual emergencies.

With the exception of small boats and craft, all Armed Forces

vessels use firemain systems. All Navy surface ships and some MSC

vessels use wet firemain systems. Submarines and all Army and Coast

Guard vessels use dry firemains. Firemain system discharges occur both

within and beyond 12 n.m. from shore. Flow rates depend upon the type,

number, and operating time of the equipment and systems using water

from the firemain system.

Samples were collected from three vessels with wet firemain systems

and analyzed to determine the constituents present. Because of longer

contact times between seawater and the piping in wet firemains, and the

use of zinc anodes in some seachests and heat exchangers to control

corrosion, pollutant concentrations in wet firemains are expected to be

higher than those in dry firemain systems. Pollutants detected in the

firemain discharge include nitrogen (measured as total Kjeldahl

nitrogen), copper, nickel, iron, zinc, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.

The concentrations of iron exceeded the most stringent State chronic

water quality criteria. Copper, nickel, and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

concentrations exceeded both the chronic Federal criteria and State

chronic water quality criteria. The concentrations of nitrogen exceeded

the most stringent State water quality criteria. These concentrations

contribute to a significant total mass loading in the discharge due to

the large volume of

[[Page 45314]]

water discharged from wet firemain systems. Circulation through heat

exchangers to cool auxiliary machinery increases the temperature of the

firemain water, but the resulting thermal effects do not exceed State

mixing zone criteria.

Firemain systems have a low potential for transporting

nonindigenous aquatic species, primarily because the systems do not

transport large volumes of water over great distances. In addition,

stagnant portions of the firemain tend to develop anaerobic conditions

which are inhospitable to most marine organisms.

EPA and DOD believe that dry firemain systems may offer one means

for reducing the total mass of pollutants discharged from firemain

systems. The use of dry firemains for Coast Guard vessels demonstrates

that, for at least some types of vessels, this option may be an

available control mechanism. Another possible MPCD option for achieving

pollutant reductions is the use of alternative piping systems (i.e.,

different metallurgy) that provide lower rates of pipe wall corrosion

and erosion. The use of dry firemains and the potential offered by

alternative piping systems demonstrates the availability of controls to

mitigate potential adverse impacts on the environment. Therefore, EPA

and DOD have determined that it is reasonable and practicable to

require the use of a MPCD for firemain systems.

12. Gas Turbine Water Wash

Gas turbine water wash consists of water periodically discharged

while cleaning internal and external components of propulsion and

auxiliary gas turbines. Approximately 155 Armed Forces vessels use gas

turbines for either propulsion or auxiliary power generation. Gas

turbine water wash is generated within 12 n.m. and varies by the type

of gas turbine and the amount of time it is operated. Because the drain

collecting system is limited in size, discharges may occur within 12

n.m. On most gas turbine Navy and MSC ships, gas turbine water wash is

collected in a dedicated collection tank and is not discharged

overboard within 12 n.m. On ships without a dedicated collection tank,

this discharge is released as a component of deck runoff, welldeck

discharges, or bilgewater.

Expected constituents of gas turbine water wash are synthetic

lubricating oil, grease, solvent-based cleaning products, hydrocarbon

combustion by-products, salts from the marine environment, and metals

leached from metallic turbine surfaces. The concentration of

naphthalene (from solvents) in the discharge is expected to exceed

acute Federal criteria and State acute water quality criteria. Copper,

nickel, and cadmium are also expected to be present in the discharge,

but at concentrations below the acute Federal criteria and State acute

water quality criteria. To limit the impacts of gas turbine water wash

discharge while operating in coastal areas, most vessels direct the

discharge to a dedicated holding tank for shore disposal. This

containment procedure demonstrates the availability of controls for

this discharge. Therefore, EPA and DOD have determined that it is

reasonable and practicable to require the use of a MPCD for gas turbine

water wash.

13. Graywater

Section 312(a)(11) of the CWA defines graywater as ``galley, bath,

and shower water.'' Recognizing the physical constraints of Armed

Forces vessels and the manner in which wastewater is handled on these

vessels, graywater is more broadly defined for the purposes of UNDS.

For the purposes of this proposed regulation, the graywater discharge

consists of graywater as defined in CWA section 312(a)(11), as well as

drainage from laundries, interior deck drains, water fountains and

miscellaneous shop sinks. All ships, and some small boats, of the Armed

Forces generate graywater on an intermittent basis. Graywater

discharges occur both within and beyond 12 n.m. from shore. Most Armed

Forces vessels collect graywater and transfer it to shore treatment

facilities while pierside. Some vessel types, however, have minimal or

no graywater collection or holding capability and discharge the

graywater directly overboard while pierside.

Less than half of all graywater discharged within 12 n.m. occurs

pierside from vessels lacking graywater collection holding capability.

The remainder of the discharge in coastal waters occurs during transit

within 12 n.m. from shore. Present in the discharge are several

priority pollutants including mercury, which is a known bioaccumulative

chemical of concern. Copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc

were detected in concentrations that exceed acute Federal criteria and

State acute water quality criteria. Graywater also contains

conventional and nonconventional pollutants, such as total suspended

solids, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, oil, grease,

ammonia, nitrogen, and phosphates. Due to the large volume of graywater

generated each year, the mass loadings of these constituents may be

significant. The use of containment systems to transfer graywater to

shore treatment facilities demonstrates the availability of controls to

mitigate adverse impacts on the environment. Therefore, EPA and DOD

have determined that it is reasonable and practicable to require a MPCD

to control graywater discharges.

14. Hull Coating Leachate

This discharge consists of constituents that leach, dissolve,

ablate, or erode from hull paints into the surrounding seawater.

Vessel hulls that are continuously exposed to seawater are

typically coated with a base anti-corrosive coating covered by an anti-

fouling coating. This coating system prevents corrosion of the

underwater hull structure and, through either an ablative (eroding or

dissolving) or non-ablative (leaching) action, releases antifouling

compounds. These compounds inhibit the adhesion of biological growth to

the hull surface.

The coatings on most vessels of the Armed Forces are either copper-

or tributyl tin (TBT)-based, with copper-based ablative paints being

the most predominant coating system. The Armed Forces have been phasing

out the use of TBT paints and now it is found only on approximately 10-

20 percent of small boats and craft with aluminum hulls. Small boats

and craft that spend most of their time out of water typically do not

receive an anti-corrosive or anti-fouling coating.

Hull coating leachate is generated continuously whenever a vessel

hull is exposed to water, within and beyond 12 n.m. from shore.

Priority pollutants expected to be present in this discharge include

copper and zinc. TBT is also expected to be present in this discharge

for those vessels with TBT paint. The release rate of the constituents

in hull coating leachate varies with the type of paint used, water

temperature, vessel speed, and the age of the coating. Using average

release rates derived from laboratory tests, the wetted surface area of

each vessel, and the number of days the vessel is located within 12

n.m., EPA and DOD estimated the mass of copper, zinc, and TBT released

in the leachate and concluded that the discharge has the potential to

cause an adverse environmental effect.

Annual releases of TBT are expected to decrease since TBT coatings

are being phased out by DOD and the Coast Guard. Both DOD and the

commercial industry have conducted research on the use of advanced

antifouling coatings such as easy release coatings (e.g., silicone)

that resist biofouling when the vessel is in motion and a critical

speed is reached. The combination of phasing out TBT paints, the

potential to establish limits on copper release rates for copper-based

coating systems, and

[[Page 45315]]

the potential for alternative coating systems to reduce copper

discharges demonstrates the availability of controls to mitigate

potential environmental impacts from hull coating leachate. Thus, EPA

and DOD determined that it is reasonable and practicable to require use

of a MPCD for hull coating leachate.

15. Motor Gasoline Compensating Discharge

This intermittent discharge consists of seawater taken into, and

discharged from, motor gasoline tanks. Motor gasoline (MOGAS) is used

to operate vehicles and equipment stored or transported on some Navy

amphibious vessels. The MOGAS is stored in a compensating fuel tank

system in which seawater is automatically added to fuel tanks as the

gasoline is consumed in order to eliminate free space where vapors

could accumulate. During refueling, gasoline displaces seawater from

the tanks, and the displaced seawater is discharged directly overboard.

A compensating system is used for MOGAS to provide supply pressure for

the gasoline and to keep the tank full to prevent potentially explosive

gasoline vapors from forming.

The Navy has two classes of vessels with MOGAS storage tanks.

Eleven of these vessels are homeported in the U.S. Based on operational

practices, vessels with MOGAS storage tanks typically refuel once per

year, and the refuelings are always conducted in port. Therefore, all

discharges from the MOGAS compensating system occur in port.

Seawater in the MOGAS compensating system is in contact with the

gasoline for long periods of time. MOGAS discharges are expected to

contain benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, phenols, and naphthalenes at

concentrations that exceed acute water quality criteria.

Specific operating procedures are followed when refueling MOGAS

tanks to reduce the potential for discharging gasoline. These

procedures require MOGAS tanks to be filled slowly and prohibit filling

the tanks beyond 80 percent of the total tank capacity. Containment is

placed around hose connections to contain any releases of gasoline, and

containment booms are placed in the water around the vessel being

refueled. Diffusers are used within the tanks to prevent entraining

fuel into the discharged compensating water. These management practices

demonstrate the availability of controls to mitigate potential adverse

impacts to the environment. Therefore, EPA and DOD have determined that

it is reasonable and practicable to require MPCDs for the MOGAS

compensating discharge.

16. Non-Oily Machinery Wastewater

This intermittent discharge is composed of water leakage from the

operation of equipment such as distillation plants, water chillers,

valve packings, water piping, low- and high-pressure air compressors,

and propulsion engine jacket coolers. The discharge is captured in a

dedicated system of drip pans, funnels, and deck drains to prevent

mixing with oily bilgewater. Only wastewater that is not expected to

contain oil is collected in this system. Non-oily machinery wastewater

from systems and equipment located above the waterline is drained

directly overboard. Non-oily machinery wastewater from systems and

equipment below the waterline is directed to collection tanks prior to

overboard discharge.

Nuclear-powered Navy surface vessels and some conventionally-

powered vessels have dedicated non-oily machinery wastewater systems.

Most other Armed Forces vessels have no dedicated non-oily machinery

wastewater system, so this type of wastewater drains directly to the

bilge and is part of the bilgewater discharge.

Non-oily machinery wastewater is discharged in port, during

transit, and at sea. This discharge is generated whenever systems or

equipment are in use, and varies in volume according to ship size and

the level of machinery use.

Pollutants, including copper, nickel, silver, and bis(2-

ethylhexyl)phthalate were present in concentrations that exceed acute

Federal criteria or State acute water quality criteria. Nitrogen (in

the form of ammonia, nitrates and nitrites, and total Kjeldahl

nitrogen) and total phosphorus were present in concentrations exceeding

the most stringent State water quality criteria. Mercury (a

bioaccumulative chemical of concern) was also detected, but at

concentrations that did not exceed Federal or State water quality

criteria. There was significant variability in sampling data, and flow

rate data were insufficient for reliably estimating mass loadings for

this discharge. System design changes to control the types and numbers

of contributing systems and equipment, and implementation of management

practices to reduce the generation of non-oily machinery wastewater are

potential options for reducing the potential impact of this discharge

on the environment. For this proposed rule, EPA and DOD have determined

that it is reasonable and practicable to require MPCDs for non-oily

machinery wastewater.

17. Photographic Laboratory Drains

This intermittent discharge is laboratory wastewater resulting from

processing photographic film. Typical liquid wastes from these

activities include spent film processing chemical developers, fixer-

bath solutions and film rinse water.

Navy ship classes such as aircraft carriers, amphibious assault

ships, and submarine tenders have photographic laboratory facilities,

including color, black-and-white and x-ray photographic processors. The

Coast Guard has two icebreakers with photographic and x-ray processing

capabilities. The MSC has two vessels that have photographic processing

equipment onboard, but the equipment normally is not operated in U.S.

waters. Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps vessels do not use

photographic equipment aboard their vessels and therefore do not

produce this discharge.

Photographic laboratory wastes may be generated within and beyond

12 n.m. from shore, although current practice is to collect and hold

the waste onboard within 12 n.m. The volume and frequency of the waste

generation varies with a vessel's photographic processing capabilities,

equipment, and operational objectives.

Expected constituents in photographic laboratory waste include

acetic acid, aluminum sulfate, ammonia, boric acid, ethylene glycol,

sulfuric acid, sodium acetate, sodium chloride, ammonium bromide,

aluminum sulfate, and silver. Concentrations of silver can exceed acute

Federal criteria and State acute water quality criteria; however, the

existing data are insufficient to determine whether drainage from

shipboard photographic laboratories has the potential to cause adverse

environmental effects.

The Navy has adopted guidance to control photographic laboratory

drains, including containerizing for onshore disposal all photographic

processing wastes generated within 12 n.m., and is transitioning to

digital photographic systems. The current handling practices and the

availability of digital photographic systems demonstrates that MPCDs

are available to mitigate potential adverse effects, if any, from

photographic laboratory drains. Therefore, EPA and DOD have determined

that it is reasonable and practicable to require use of a MPCD for this

discharge.

[[Page 45316]]

18. Seawater Cooling Overboard Discharge

This discharge consists of seawater from a dedicated system that

provides noncontact cooling water for other vessel systems. The

seawater cooling system continuously provides cooling water to heat

exchangers, removing heat from main propulsion machinery, electrical

generating plants, and other auxiliary equipment. The heated seawater

is discharged directly overboard. With the exception of some small,

non-self-propelled vessels and service craft, all Armed Forces vessels

discharge seawater from cooling systems. Typically, the demand for

seawater cooling is continuous and occurs both within and beyond 12

n.m. from shore.

Seawater cooling overboard discharge contains trace materials from

seawater cooling system pipes, valves, seachests, pumps, and heat

exchangers. Pollutants detected in seawater cooling overboard discharge

include copper, zinc, nickel, arsenic, chromium, lead, and nitrogen (in

the form of ammonia, nitrates and nitrities, and total Kjeldahl

nitrogen). Copper, nickel, and silver were detected in concentrations

exceeding both the chronic Federal criteria and State chronic water

quality criteria. Nitrogen was detected in concentrations exceeding the

most stringent State water quality criteria. These concentrations

contribute to a significant total mass released by this discharge due

to the large volume of cooling water. In addition, thermal effects

modeling indicate that some vessels may exceed State thermal mixing

zone requirements. The seawater cooling water system has a low

potential for transporting nonindigenous species, because the residence

time for most portions of the system are short. However, a strainer

plate is used to minimize the inflow of larger biota during system

operation. The strainer plate is periodically cleaned using low

pressure air or steam to dislodge any accumulated material. This

procedure may result in releasing biota that have attached to the

plate.

A potential MPCD option for achieving pollutant reductions is the

use of alternative piping systems (i.e., different metallurgy) that

provide lower rates of pipe wall corrosion and erosion. The potential

substitution of materials demonstrates the availability of controls to

mitigate potential adverse impacts on the environment. Based on this

information, EPA and DOD have determined that it is reasonable and

practicable to require use of a MPCD for this discharge.

19. Seawater Piping Biofouling Prevention

This discharge consists of the additives used to prevent the growth

and attachment of biofouling organisms in seawater cooling systems on

selected vessels, as well as the reaction byproducts resulting from the

use of these additives. Aboard some vessels, active biofouling control

systems are used to control biological fouling of surfaces within the

seawater cooling systems. Generally, these active biofouling control

systems are used when the cooling system piping does not have inherent

antifouling properties (e.g., titanium piping). The most common

seawater piping biofouling prevention systems include chlorination,

chemical dosing, and anodic biofouling control systems. All three

systems act to prevent fouling organisms from adhering to and growing

on interior piping and components. Fouling reduces seawater flow and

heat transfer efficiency. Chlorinators use electric current to generate

chlorine and chlorine-produced oxidants from seawater. Anodic

biofouling control systems use electric current to accelerate the

dissolving of an anode to release metal ions into the piping system.

Chemical dosing uses an alcohol-based chemical dispersant that is

intermittently injected into the seawater system.

Twenty-nine Armed Forces vessels use active seawater piping

biofouling control systems. Nine vessels use onboard chlorinators, 19

vessels use anodic biofouling control systems, and one vessel employs

chemical dosing. Chlorinators operate on a preset schedule of

intermittent operation, a few hours daily. Chemical dispersant dosing

is performed for one hour every three days. Anodic systems normally

operate continuously.

Seawater discharged from systems with active biofouling control

systems is likely to contain residuals from the fouling control agent

(chlorine, alcohol-based chemical additives, or copper), in addition to

constituents normally found in cooling water. Based on modeling of the

discharge plume, EPA and DOD estimate that receiving water

concentrations of residual chlorine could exceed chronic Federal

criteria and State chronic water quality criteria. Because of the large

volume of seawater discharged from these systems, the resulting mass

loading of chlorine released to the environment is considered

significant.

Existing operational controls that limit the residual chlorine

discharged to the environment demonstrate the availability of an MPCD

to mitigate the potential for adverse impacts from this discharge. EPA

and DOD have determined that it is reasonable and practicable to

require a MPCD for seawater piping biofouling prevention systems.

20. Small Boat Engine Wet Exhaust

This discharge is the seawater that is mixed and discharged with

small boat propulsion engine exhaust gases to cool the exhaust and

quiet the engine. Small boats are powered by either inboard or outboard

engines. Seawater is injected into the exhaust of these engines for

cooling and to quiet engine operation. Constituents from the engine

exhaust are transferred to the injected seawater and discharged

overboard as wet exhaust.

Most small boats with engines generate this discharge. The majority

of inboard engines used on small boats are two-stroke engines that use

diesel fuel. The majority of outboard engines are two-stroke engines

that use a gasoline-oil mixture for fuel. This discharge is generated

when operating small boats. Due to their limited range and mission,

small boats spend the majority of their operating time within 12 n.m.

from shore.

Wet exhaust from outboard engines contains several constituents

that can exceed acute Federal criteria or State acute water quality

criteria including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and naphthalene. Wet

exhaust from inboard engines can contain benzene, ethylbenzene, and

total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that can exceed State

water quality criteria. Mass loadings of these wet exhaust constituents

are considered large. Potential MPCD options include replacing existing

outboard engines with new reduced-emission outboard engines, and

ensuring all new boats and craft have inboard engines with dry exhaust

systems. Therefore, EPA and DOD have determined that it is reasonable

and practicable to require use of a MPCD for small boat engine wet

exhaust.

21. Sonar Dome Discharge

This discharge is generated by the leaching of antifoulant

materials from the sonar dome material into the surrounding seawater

and the discharge of seawater or freshwater from within the sonar dome

during maintenance activities. Hull-mounted sonar domes house the

electronic equipment used to navigate, detect, and determine the range

to objects. Sonar domes are composed of either rubber impregnated with

TBT anti-foulant, rubber without

[[Page 45317]]

TBT, steel, or glass-reinforced plastic, and are filled with freshwater

and/or seawater to maintain their shape and internal pressure. The

discharge is generated when materials leach from the exterior surface

of the dome, or when water from inside the dome is pumped overboard to

allow for periodic maintenance or repairs on the sonar dome or

equipment housed inside the dome.

Only Navy and MSC operate vessels with sonar domes. Sonar domes are

currently installed on approximately 225 vessels, including eight

classes of Navy vessels and one class of MSC vessels. Sonar domes on

MSC vessels are fiberglass and do not contain TBT.

The leaching of materials from the exterior surface of the dome is

a continuous discharge and occurs both within and beyond 12 n.m. from

shore. Discharges from the interior of the dome are intermittent and

occur while the vessel is pierside as water inside the dome is removed

to allow for periodic maintenance or repairs (approximately twice per

year per dome).

Expected constituents of sonar dome water discharge are TBT,

dibutyl tin, monobutyl tin, and metals such as copper, nickel, zinc,

and tin. Based on sampling data in the record, concentrations of TBT,

copper, nickel, and zinc can exceed acute Federal criteria or State

acute water quality criteria, although fleetwide mass loadings of these

constituents are not considered large (15 lbs/year of TBT, 23 lbs/year

of copper, 11 lbs/year of nickel, and 122 lbs/year of zinc).

Nevertheless, the Navy has instituted a program to install new sonar

domes that do not have TBT-impregnated internal surfaces as existing

domes require replacement. This practice demonstrates the availability

of a control to mitigate potential adverse environmental impacts, if

any, from sonar dome discharges. Therefore EPA and DOD have determined

that it is reasonable and practicable to require a MPCD for sonar dome

discharges.

22. Submarine Bilgewater

The submarine bilgewater discharge contains a mixture of wastewater

and leakage from a variety of sources that are allowed to drain to the

lowest inner part of the hull, known as the bilge. These sources can

include condensed steam from steam systems, spillage from drinking

fountains, valve and piping leaks, and evaporator dumps (i.e.,

evaporator water that fails to meet specifications for use). From the

various collection points in the bilge, this bilgewater is transferred

via an auxiliary drain system to a series of holding tanks. Most

submarines have the capability to segregate oily wastewater from non-

oily wastewater. The non-oily waste is discharged directly overboard

and the oily wastewater is collected in a tank that allows gravity

separation of the oil and water. The separated water phase is then

discharged overboard, as needed, and the oil phase held onboard until

it can be transferred to shore facilities for disposal.

This discharge is generated by all submarines, all of which are

operated by the Navy. Approximately 60 of the submarines (the SSN 688

class) discharge the separated water phase from the bilgewater

collection tanks within and beyond 12 n.m. from shore. The remaining

submarines generally hold all bilgewater onboard until they are beyond

50 n.m. from shore. The frequency and volume of the discharge is highly

variable, depending upon crew size, operating depth, and equipment

conditions.

Sampling conducted onboard submarines showed concentrations of

cadmium, chlorine, copper, cyanide, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide,

mercury (a bioaccumulative chemical of concern), nickel, oil, phenol,

silver, and zinc that exceeded acute Federal criteria or State acute

water quality criteria. Submarines use gravity separation to reduce the

concentration of oil in bilgewater prior to discharge; however, this

method apparently does not consistently produce a discharge that meets

water quality criteria. The adequacy of existing gravity separation

treatment to provide effective environmental protection will be

addressed by the Phase II rulemaking. The nature of this discharge is

such that submarine bilgewater, if untreated, could potentially impact

the environment. Because of this potential to cause adverse

environmental impacts, coupled with the demonstration that pollution

controls are available to reduce the oil content of the discharge, EPA

and DOD have determined that it is reasonable and practicable to

require the use of a MPCD for submarine bilgewater.

23. Surface Vessel Bilgewater/OWS Discharge

The surface vessel bilgewater/OWS discharge consists of a mixture

of wastewater and leakage from a variety of sources that are allowed to

drain to the lowest inner part of the hull, known as the bilge. The

sources of surface vessel bilgewater are generally similar to those

discussed above for submarines. An additional source of bilgewater for

surface vessels is water from the continual blowdown of boilers (i.e.,

boiler blowdown). On surface vessels, bilgewater is usually transferred

to an oily waste holding tank, where it is stored for shore disposal or

treated in an oil-water separator (OWS) to remove oil before being

discharged overboard. Some vessels also have an oil content monitor

(OCM) installed downstream from the OWS to monitor bilgewater oil

content prior to discharge. Vessels with OCMs have the capability to

return bilgewater not meeting a preset oil concentration limit to the

OWS for reprocessing until the limit is met. Oil collected from the OWS

separation process is held in a waste oil tank until transferred to

shore facilities for disposal.

All vessels of the Armed Forces produce bilgewater and most of the

larger vessels have OWS systems. Small craft bilgewater is collected

and transferred to shore facilities while pierside.

Bilgewater accumulates continuously; however, vessels of the Armed

Forces do not discharge untreated bilgewater. Under current policy,

bilgewater treated by an OWS can be discharged as needed within 12

n.m., while untreated bilgewater is held for transfer to a shore

facility for treatment. For vessels with an OWS and OCM, oil

concentrations in the treated bilgewater must be less than 15 ppm prior

to overboard discharge.

Sampling data for OWS effluent show oil, copper, iron, mercury (a

bioaccumulative chemical of concern), nickel, and zinc exceed acute

Federal criteria or State acute water quality criteria. Sampling data

also show concentrations of nitrogen (in the form of ammonia, nitrates

and nitrites, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen) and phosphorus exceed the

most stringent State water quality criteria. The estimated mass loading

for oil is considered to be large.

The existing policies prohibiting the discharge of untreated

bilgewater, and the extensive use of oil-water separators and oil

content monitors demonstrate the availability of pollution controls for

bilgewater. The data in the record indicate that untreated bilgewater

would likely cause adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, EPA and

DOD have determined that it is reasonable and practicable to require

the use of a MPCD for this discharge.

24. Underwater Ship Husbandry

The underwater ship husbandry discharge is composed of materials

discharged during the inspection, maintenance, cleaning, and repair of

hulls and hull appendages performed while the vessel is waterborne.

Underwater ship husbandry includes activities such as hull cleaning,

[[Page 45318]]

fiberglass repair, welding, sonar dome repair, propulsor lay-up, non-

destructive testing, masker belt repairs, and painting operations.

Underwater ship husbandry discharge is created occasionally by all

Navy surface ships and submarines, and some Coast Guard vessels. These

ship husbandry operations are normally conducted pierside. Of the

underwater ship husbandry operations, only underwater hull cleaning and

propulsor (i.e., propeller) lay-up have the potential for causing an

adverse environmental effect. Underwater hull cleaning is conducted by

divers using a mechanical brush system. Copper and zinc are released

during cleaning in concentrations that exceed acute Federal criteria

and State acute water quality criteria and produce a significant mass

loading of constituents. The copper and zinc in this discharge

originate from the anti-fouling and anticorrosive hull coatings applied

to vessels. Data from commercial vessels indicate that underwater hull

cleaning also has the potential to transfer nonindigenous aquatic

species. Propulsor lay-up requires the placement of a vinyl cover over

the propulsor to reduce fouling of the propulsor when the vessel is in

port for extended periods. Chlorine-produced oxidants are generated

from impressed current cathodic protection systems and can build up

within the cover to levels exceeding State water quality criteria.

However, discharges from this operation, as well as other ship

husbandry operations (excluding hull cleaning) are infrequent and small

in terms of volume or mass loading.

The Navy has established policies to minimize the number of hull

cleanings, based on the degree to which biological fouling has

occurred. In addition, the Navy has established procedures to use the

least abrasive cleaning equipment necessary as a means for reducing the

mass of copper and zinc in the discharge. These practices represent

available controls to mitigate adverse impacts from underwater ship

husbandry operations, and EPA and DOD have determined that it is

reasonable and practicable to require the use of a MPCD to control this

discharge.

25. Welldeck Discharges

This discharge is the water that accumulates from the seawater

flooding of the docking well (welldeck) of a vessel used to transport,

load, and unload amphibious vessels, and from the maintenance and

freshwater washings of the welldeck and equipment and vessels stored in

the welldeck.

Amphibious operations by the Armed Forces require transport of

vehicles, equipment, and personnel between ship and shore on landing

craft. The landing craft are stored in a docking well, or welldeck, of

some classes of amphibious warfare ships. To load or unload landing

craft, amphibious warfare ships may need to flood the welldeck by

taking on ballast water and sinking the aft (rear) end of the ship.

Water that washes out of the welldeck contains residual materials that

were on the welldeck prior to flooding. Other welldeck discharges are

created by routine operations such as washing equipment and vehicles

with potable water, washing the gas turbine engines of air-cushion

landing craft (LCACs) in the welldeck with mild detergents, and

graywater from stored utility landing craft (LCUs). Additionally, the

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) requires washing welldecks,

vehicle storage areas, and equipment upon return from overseas

locations. The washing is required to ensure that there is no

inadvertent transport of nonindigenous species to land. USDA-required

washes of welldecks and vehicle storage areas occur pierside, while

vehicles and equipment are washed onshore in a USDA-designated area.

Effluent from these activities drain to unflooded welldecks and are

discharged directly overboard.

The Navy is the only branch of the Armed Forces with ships having

welldecks. Thirty-three amphibious warfare ships produce this

discharge, which is released both within and beyond 12 n.m. from shore.

Depending upon the specific activities conducted, welldeck

discharges contain a variety of residual constituents, including oil

and grease, ethylene glycol (antifreeze), chlorine, detergents/

cleaners, metals, solvents, and sea-salt residues. The volume of

welldeck washout varies depending upon the type of landing craft to be

loaded or unloaded. The greatest volume of welldeck discharge occurs

when LCUs are being loaded into, or unloaded from the welldeck. Loading

and unloading of LCACs does not require the welldeck to be flooded.

Instead, a small ``surge'' of water enters the ship during these

operations. Constituent concentrations in welldeck washout are expected

to be low due to dilution in the large volume of water discharged, and

because of general housekeeping procedures which require containment

and cleanup of spills on the welldeck.

Other discharges from the welldeck include vehicle and craft

washwater, gas turbine engine washes, and USDA washes. Constituents of

these discharges are expected to be identical to those in welldeck

washout. Of the various welldeck discharges, gas turbine water washes

and USDA washes may result in hydrocarbon, chlorine, or metal

concentrations that exceed acute water quality criteria. In addition,

there is a potential for nonindigenous species to be introduced from

USDA-required welldeck washes, although it should be noted that the

viability of any species introduced is questionable since they

generally would have been exposed to air for extended periods of time

prior to their introduction into U.S. coastal waters (i.e., for the

most part, these species would have been removed from vehicles and deck

surfaces and thus it would not be a water-to-water transfer, in

contrast to species transfers from ballast water systems).

Existing practices for containment and cleanup of welldeck spills

demonstrate the availability of controls to reduce contamination of

welldeck discharges and the potential for causing adverse environmental

impacts (e.g., oil sheens). EPA and DOD have determined that it is

reasonable and practicable to require a MPCD for welldeck discharges.

D. Discharges That Do Not Require Use of a MPCD

For the reasons discussed below, EPA and DOD have determined that

it is not reasonable and practicable to require the use of a MPCD to

control 14 discharges incidental to the normal operation of Armed

Forces vessels. Based on the information in the record, these

discharges have a low potential to adversely affect the environment by

introduction of chemical constituents, thermal pollution,

bioaccumulative chemicals of concern, or nonindigenous species.

As discussed below, in some cases, the concentration of one or more

constituents in the undiluted discharge exceed water quality criteria

at the point of discharge. However, such discharges occur in low

volumes or infrequently. In all of these instances, either the

pollutant concentration in the discharge plume quickly falls below

water quality criteria once the dilution effect of mixing zones is

taken into account, or the low mass loading of the discharge is

unlikely to adversely affect the environment.

EPA and DOD have determined that it is not reasonable and

practicable to require a MPCD to mitigate adverse impacts on the marine

environment for the discharges listed in Table 2 of this preamble and

discussed below in this section. These discharges would not require

control, and no control standards will be set for them, in Phase

[[Page 45319]]

II of UNDS development. Upon promulgation of the final Phase I rule,

States and their political subdivisions would be prohibited from

adopting or enforcing any statute or regulation to control these

discharges, except by establishing no-discharge zones (see section VI.C

of this preamble). Following promulgation of the final Phase I rule,

States can petition EPA and DOD to review the determination not to

require MPCDs for these discharges using the procedures set forth in

proposed 40 CFR 1700.11 and 1700.12.

The discussion below provides a brief description of the discharges

and the systems that produce the discharge and highlights the most

significant constituents released to the environment and other

characteristics of the discharge. A more detailed discussion of these

discharges is presented in Appendix A of the Technical Development

Document.

1. Boiler Blowdown

This discharge is the water and steam discharged during the

blowdown of a boiler or steam generator, or when a safety valve is

tested. Boilers are used to produce steam for propulsion and a variety

of auxiliary and hotel services. Water supplied to the boiler system

(feedwater) is treated with chemicals to inhibit corrosion and the

formation of scale in the boiler and boiler system piping.

Periodically, water must be removed from the boiler to control the

buildup of particulates, sludge, and treatment chemical concentrations.

The term ``blowdown'' refers to the minimum discharge of boiler water

required to prevent the buildup of these materials in the boiler to

levels that would adversely affect boiler operation and maintenance.

There are four types of boiler blowdown procedures employed on Armed

Forces vessels: (1) surface blowdowns for removing materials dissolved

in the boiler water and for controlling boiler water chemistry; (2)

scum blowdowns for removing surface scum; (3) bottom blowdowns for

removing sludge that settles at the bottom of boilers; and (4)

continuous blowdowns for removing dissolved metal chelates and other

suspended matter. The type of blowdown used is a function of the boiler

water chemistry and thus varies among vessel classes. With the

exception of continuous blowdowns, boiler blowdowns are discharged

below the vessel waterline. Continuous blowdowns are discharged inside

the vessel and are directed to the bilge. These are addressed as part

of the surface vessel bilgewater/OWS discharge (see section V.C.23 of

this preamble). Another discharge occurs during periodic testing of

steam generator safety valves on nuclear-powered vessels. The safety

valve discharge is a short-duration release of steam below the vessel

waterline.

Approximately 360 surface vessels and submarines discharge boiler

blowdowns directly to receiving waters. These blowdowns occur both

within and beyond 12 n.m. from shore. Nuclear-powered ships perform

steam generator safety valve testing only in port once every five

years.

Boiler blowdown is discharged intermittently in small volumes

(approximately 300 gallons per discharge), at high velocities (over 400

feet per second), and at elevated temperatures (over 325 degrees

Fahrenheit). Boiler water treatment chemicals used by Armed Forces

vessels include ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydrazine,

sodium hydroxide, and disodium phosphate. Sampling data for boiler

blowdowns indicate the presence of nitrogen (in the form of ammonia,

nitrates and nitrites, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen), phosphorus,

hydrazine, iron, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, antimony, arsenic,

cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, thallium, and zinc.

Boiler blowdown discharges from conventionally-powered boilers exceed

Federal criteria and State water quality criteria for copper, nickel,

and zinc, and the most stringent State water quality criteria for

nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, and lead. Blowdown discharges from nuclear-

powered steam generators exceed acute Federal criteria and State acute

water quality criteria for copper, and the most stringent State acute

water quality criteria for lead and nickel. For nitrogen and

phosphorus, the most stringent State water quality criteria was

exceeded. However, the turbulent mixing resulting from the high

velocity discharge, and the relatively small volume of the boiler

blowdown causes pollutant concentrations to rapidly dissipate to

background levels or below acute Federal criteria

This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.