Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace (Jetstream) Model 4101 Airplanes
Federal RegisterJul 31, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 97-NM-339-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace (Jetstream) Model
4101 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all British Aerospace
(Jetstream) Model 4101 airplanes, that currently requires repetitive
functional testing of the main entrance door, cleaning and lubricating
of the ``speed'' lock and ``G'' lock systems, and repair, if necessary.
This action would add a requirement for replacement of the ``G'' lock
rollers with new, improved ``G'' lock rollers. This proposal is
prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information
by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by
the proposed AD are intended to prevent inability of the main entrance
door to open, which could delay or impede passengers exiting the
airplane, or rescue personnel from entering the airplane during an
emergency.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 31, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-NM-339-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from AI(R) American Support, Inc., 13850 Mclearen Road,
Herndon, Virginia 20171. This information may be examined at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 97-NM-339-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 97-NM-339-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
On September 3, 1997, the FAA issued AD 97-19-02, amendment 39-
10122 (62 FR 47362, September 9, 1997), applicable to all British
Aerospace (Jetstream) Model 4101 airplanes, to require repetitive
functional testing of the main entrance door, cleaning and lubricating
of the ``speed'' lock and ``G'' lock systems, and repair, if necessary.
That action was prompted by reports of flightcrews and ground crews
being unable to open the main entrance door. The requirements of that
AD are intended to prevent inability of the main entrance door to open,
which could delay or impede passengers exiting the airplane, or rescue
personnel from entering the airplane during an emergency.
Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
In the preamble to AD 97-19-02, the FAA specified that the actions
required by that AD were considered ``interim action'' and that once a
modification is developed, approved, and available, the FAA may
consider additional rulemaking action. The manufacturer now has
developed such a modification, and the FAA has determined that further
rulemaking action is indeed necessary; this proposed AD follows from
that determination.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
British Aerospace Regional Aircraft has issued Jetstream Alert
Service Bulletins J41-A-52-059, dated September 12, 1997, and Revision
2, dated January 23, 1998, which describe procedures for replacement of
the ``G'' lock rollers with rollers having increased diameters. The
installation of ``G'' lock rollers with increased diameters provides a
means to prevent jamming of the main entrance door by increasing the
mechanism clearance when the door handle is operated. The Civil
Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the airworthiness authority for the
United Kingdom, classified these alert service bulletins as mandatory
and issued British airworthiness directive 001-09-97 in order to assure
the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in the United Kingdom.
FAA's Conclusions
This airplane model is manufactured in the United Kingdom and is
type certificated for operation in the United States under the
provisions of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant
to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the CAA has kept the FAA
informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the
findings of the CAA, reviewed all available information, and determined
that AD action is necessary for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United States.
[[Page 40857]]
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered
in the United States, the proposed AD would supersede AD 97-19-02 to
continue to require repetitive functional testing of the main entrance
door, cleaning and lubricating of the ``speed'' lock and ``G'' lock
systems, and repair, if necessary. The proposed AD would add a
requirement for replacement of the ``G'' lock rollers with new,
improved ``G'' lock rollers. The actions would be required to be
accomplished in accordance with the alert service bulletins described
previously.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 57 airplanes of U.S. registry that would be
affected by this proposed AD.
The actions that are currently required by AD 97-19-02 take
approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the currently required actions on U.S. operators is estimated
to be $3,420, or $60 per airplane, per functional test cycle.
The new actions that are proposed in this AD action would take
approximately 3 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts would be provided by
the manufacturer at no cost to the operator. Based on these figures,
the cost impact of the proposed requirements of this AD on U.S.
operators is estimated to be $10,260, or $180 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the current or proposed
requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish
those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-10122 (62 FR
47362, September 9, 1997), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), to read as follows:
British Aerospace Regional Aircraft [Formerly Jetstream Aircraft
Limited; British Aerospace (Commercial Aircraft) Limited]: Docket
97-NM-339-AD. Supersedes AD 97-19-02, Amendment 39-10122.
Applicability: All Jetstream Model 4101 airplanes, certificated
in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent inability of the main entrance door to open, which
could delay or impede passengers exiting the airplane, or rescue
personnel from entering the airplane during an emergency, accomplish
the following:
Restatement of Requirements of AD 97-19-02, Amendment 39-10122:
(a) Within 30 days after September 24, 1997 (the effective date
of AD 97-19-02, amendment 39-10122), perform a functional test to
verify proper operation of the main entrance door (including the
``G'' lock system) and the ``speed'' lock system of the main
entrance door, in accordance with Section 52-10-05 of BAe Jetstream
Series 4101 Maintenance Manual (MM).
(1) If the ``speed'' lock and the ``G'' lock function
satisfactorily: Within 60 days after September 24, 1997, perform the
actions specified in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Clean (remove existing contaminants and lubricant) and re-
lubricate (with a dry lubricant) the ``speed'' lock and main
entrance door ``G'' lock systems in accordance with Jetstream
Service Bulletin J41-52-058, dated July 14, 1997. And,
(ii) Following accomplishment of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this AD,
and prior to further flight, repeat the functional test specified in
paragraph (a) of this AD.
(A) If the ``G'' lock and the ``speed'' lock function
satisfactorily in the functional test required by paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) of this AD, accomplish the requirements of paragraph (b)
of this AD.
(B) If the ``G'' lock and the ``speed'' lock do not function
satisfactorily in the functional test required by paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) of this AD: Prior to further flight, repair the ``G''
lock and the ``speed'' lock in accordance with a method approved by
the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate.
(2) If either the ``speed'' lock and/or the ``G'' lock do not
function correctly: Prior to further flight, perform the actions
specified in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Clean (remove existing contaminants and lubricant) and re-
lubricate (with a dry lubricant) the main entrance door ``speed''
lock and ``G'' lock systems in accordance with Jetstream Service
Bulletin J41-52-058, dated July 14, 1997. And,
(ii) Following accomplishment of paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this AD,
and prior to further flight, repeat the functional test of the main
entrance door (including the ``G'' lock system) and the ``speed''
lock system, in accordance with the MM.
(A) If the ``G'' lock and ``speed'' lock function satisfactorily
in the functional test required by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD,
accomplish the requirements of paragraph (b) of this AD.
(B) If the ``G'' lock and ``speed'' lock do not function
satisfactorily in the functional tests required by paragraph (a)(2)
of this AD: Prior to further flight, repair the ``G'' lock and
``speed'' lock in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116.
(b) Perform the actions specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and
(b)(2) of this AD within 1,500 hours time-in-service following
accomplishment of the initial functional test
[[Page 40858]]
of the main entrance door required by paragraph (a) of this AD.
Repeat the actions specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this
AD, thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 1,500 hours time-in-
service.
(1) Clean (remove contaminants and dry lubricant) and re-
lubricate (with dry lubricant) the main entrance door ``speed'' lock
and ``G'' lock systems in accordance with Jetstream Service Bulletin
J41-52-058, dated July 14, 1997.
(2) Following accomplishment of paragraph (b)(1) of this AD and
prior to further flight, perform a functional test of the main
entrance door (including the ``G'' lock system) and the ``speed''
lock system, in accordance with the MM. If the ``G'' lock or
``speed'' lock system do not perform satisfactorily: Prior to
further flight, repair the ``G'' lock or ``speed'' lock system in
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
New Requirements of This AD:
(c) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, replace
the ``G'' lock rollers on the main entrance door with new, improved
``G'' lock rollers in accordance with Jetstream Alert Service
Bulletin J41-A-52-059, dated September 12, 1997, or Revision 2,
dated January 23, 1998.
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in British
airworthiness directive 001-09-97.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 24, 1998.
S. R. Miller,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-20430 Filed 7-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.