Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Revision in Container Regulations
Federal RegisterJun 16, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. FV98-922-1 IFR]
Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Revision in
Container Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises the container requirements currently
prescribed under the Washington apricot marketing order. The marketing
order regulates the handling of apricots grown in designated counties
in Washington and is administered locally by the Washington Apricot
Marketing Committee (Committee). This rule removes the requirement to
use a top pad when apricots are packed loose in closed containers that
weigh not less than 24 pounds. This revision will allow handlers
greater flexibility in determining the need for a top pad depending on
apricot variety or container dimensions. This change is expected to
increase returns to producers and to improve the quality of apricots
available to consumers.
DATES: Effective June 17, 1998. Comments received by August 17, 1998
will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456,
Washington, DC 20090-6456; Fax: (202) 205-6632. All comments should
reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue
of the Federal Register and will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business
hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa L. Hutchinson, Northwest
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, F&V,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue, Room 369, Portland, Oregon 97204;
telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440; or George Kelhart,
Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington,
DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-6632. Small
businesses may request information on compliance with this regulation
by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456,
Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-
6632.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 132 and Marketing Order No. 922 (7 CFR part 922),
regulating the handling of apricots grown in designated counties in
Washington, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The marketing
agreement and order are effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a
petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance
with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted
therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition.
The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her
principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's
ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20
days after date of the entry of the ruling.
This rule revises the order's container regulations by removing the
requirement to use a top pad when apricots are packed loose in closed
containers that weigh not less than 24 pounds. A top pad is a pad made
of various materials, typically paper, which is placed on top of fruit
packed in a closed container. This change will allow handlers greater
flexibility in determining the need for a top pad depending on apricot
variety or container dimensions. This change is expected to increase
returns to producers and handlers, and to improve the quality of
apricots available to consumers.
Section 922.52 of the order provides authority for container
regulations and section 922.53 allows the modification, suspension, or
termination of the container regulations. The container regulations are
prescribed in section 922.306. Paragraph (a)(4) of that section
currently requires handlers to use a top pad when apricots are packed
loose in closed containers that weigh not less than 24 pounds.
At its May 14, 1998, meeting the Committee unanimously recommended
removing the requirement requiring mandatory use of a top pad in
apricots packed loose in closed containers weighing not less than 24
pounds. This requirement for a top pad was intended to protect apricots
from bouncing and bruising during transportation to market. However,
some varieties of apricots, typically the newer and larger varieties,
are often damaged from rubbing against a top pad. The Committee
believed that some varieties of apricots, typically the older and
smaller varieties, still derive benefit from the use of a top pad.
Therefore, the Committee believed that handlers should have the
flexibility to determine whether or not to use a top pad in these
closed containers depending on apricot variety or container dimensions.
Currently, the container regulations require the use of a top pad
regardless of the apricot variety or the dimensions of the closed
container. This rule provides handlers greater flexibility to use
different packaging techniques for different varieties, and to develop
new packaging techniques that do not require a top pad. This rule also
provides handlers greater flexibility to use containers with different
dimensions because some containers may not have sufficient space for a
top pad. This change is expected to increase returns to producers and
handlers because of the elimination of the cost of a top pad (ranging
in cost from 4 cents per pad for paper to 25 cents per pad for foam)
and to improve the quality of apricots available to consumers because
of decreased fruit damage during transit. The removal of the
requirement requiring mandatory use of a top pad for apricots packed
loose in closed containers weighing not less than 24
[[Page 32718]]
pounds will save producers and handlers the cost of a top pad when the
pad is not needed.
An editorial change which removes, for clarity, reference in
section 922.306(a)(4) to containers being row-faced or tray-packed does
not eliminate the current requirement in section 922.306(a)(2) which
applies to all containers with a net weight of apricots greater than 14
pounds.
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 75 handlers of Washington apricots who are
subject to regulation under the order and approximately 400 apricot
producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms have
been defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as
those having annual receipts of less than $5,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of
less than $500,000. The majority of Washington apricot handlers and
producers may be classified as small entities.
At its May 14, 1998, meeting the Committee unanimously recommended
removing the requirement requiring mandatory use of a top pad in
apricots packed loose in closed containers weighing not less than 24
pounds. The requirement for a top pad was intended to protect apricots
from bouncing and bruising during transportation to market. However,
some varieties of apricots, typically the newer and larger varieties,
are often damaged from rubbing against a top pad. The Committee
believed that some varieties of apricots, typically the older and
smaller varieties, still derive benefit from the use of a top pad.
Therefore, the Committee believed that handlers should have the
flexibility to determine whether or not to use a top pad in these
closed containers depending on apricot variety or container dimensions.
Currently, the container regulations require the use of a top pad
regardless of the apricot variety or the dimensions of the closed
container. This rule provides handlers greater flexibility to use
different packaging techniques for different varieties, and to develop
new packaging techniques that do not require a top pad. This rule also
provides handlers greater flexibility to use containers with different
dimensions because some containers may not have sufficient space for a
top pad. This change is expected to increase returns to producers and
handlers because of the elimination of the cost of a top pad (ranging
in cost from 4 cents per pad for paper to 25 cents per pad for foam)
and to improve the quality of apricots available to consumers because
of decreased fruit damage during transit.
The removal of the mandatory use of a top pad for apricots packed
loose in closed containers weighing not less than 24 pounds will save
producers and handlers the cost of a top pad when the pad is not
needed.
The only alternative would be to continue the mandatory use of a
top pad to the detriment of the quality of certain varieties of
apricots.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large apricot handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sectors. In addition, the Department has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the Washington apricot industry and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like
all Committee meetings, the May 14, 1998, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their
views on this issue. The Committee itself is composed of 12 members, of
which four are handlers and eight are growers, the majority of whom are
small entities. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
this interim final rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
This rule invites comments on a revision to the container
regulations currently prescribed under the Washington apricot marketing
order. Any comments received will be considered prior to finalization
of this rule.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule removes a requirement to use a top pad in
Washington apricots packed loose in closed containers weighing not less
than 24 pounds; (2) this rule was unanimously recommended by the
Committee at an open public meeting and all interested parties had an
opportunity to express their views and provide input; (3) Washington
apricot handlers are aware of this rule and need no additional time to
comply with the relaxed requirements; (4) June 15, 1998, is the date
1998 season shipments of the Washington apricot crop are expected to
begin; and (5) this rule provides a 60-day comment period and any
comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is
amended as follows:
PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 922 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. In Sec. 922.306, paragraph (a)(4) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 922.306 Apricot Regulation 6.
(a) * * *
(4) In closed containers containing not less than 24 pounds, net
weight, of apricots when packed loose in such containers; or
* * * * *
Dated: June 12, 1998.
Robert C. Keeney,
Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
[FR Doc. 98-16092 Filed 6-12-98; 1:41 p.m.]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.