Availability of an Environmental Assessment and Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the Seneca Resources Corporation/Enron Oil and Gas Company West Landslide Habitat Conservation Plan, Kern County, CA
Federal RegisterJun 3, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Availability of an Environmental Assessment and Receipt of an
Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the Seneca Resources
Corporation/Enron Oil and Gas Company West Landslide Habitat
Conservation Plan, Kern County, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service; Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability and receipt of application.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Seneca Resources
Corporation (Seneca) and Enron Oil and Gas Company (Enron) have applied
to the Fish and Wildlife Service for an incidental take permit pursuant
to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. The proposed permit would authorize the incidental take of San
Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica), blunt-nosed leopard lizard
(Gambelia silus), giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens), California
condor (Gymnogyps californianus), federally listed as endangered, and
Hoover's eriastrum (Eriastrum hooveri), federally listed as threatened.
The proposed permit also would authorize future incidental take of the
San Joaquin antelope squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni), short-nosed
kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides brevinasus), western burrowing owl
(Athene cunicularia hypugea), and recurved larkspur (Delphinium
recurvatum), currently unlisted species, should any of them become
listed under the Endangered Species Act in the future. The permit would
be in effect for 30 years.
The Service also announces the availability of an Environmental
Assessment for the incidental take permit application. The application
includes the proposed Habitat Conservation Plan (Plan) fully describing
the proposed project and mitigation, and the accompanying Implementing
Agreement. This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(a) of the
Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). All comments received, including names and
addresses, will become part of the official administrative record and
may be made available to the public.
DATES: Written comments on the permit application, Environmental
Assessment and Implementing Agreement should be received on or before
July 6, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Comments regarding the application or adequacy of the
Environmental Assessment and Implementing Agreement should be addressed
to the Field Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and
Wildlife Office, 3310 El Camino, Suite 130, Sacramento, California
95821-6340. Individuals wishing copies of the application,
Environmental Assessment or Implementing Agreement for review should
immediately contact the above office. Documents also will be available
for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at
the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Pine or Peter Cross, Sacramento
Fish and Wildlife Office, (916) 979-2728.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act and
Federal regulation prohibit the ``taking'' of a species listed as
endangered or threatened, respectively. However, the Service may, under
limited circumstances, issue permits to take listed species incidental
to, and not the purpose of, otherwise lawful activities. Regulations
governing permits for threatened species are promulgated in 50 CFR
17.32; regulations governing permits for endangered species are
promulgated in 50 CFR 17.22.
Background
Seneca Resources Corporation and Enron Oil and Gas Company seek
coverage for take of the federally listed San Joaquin kit fox, blunt-
nosed leopard lizard, giant kangaroo rat, California condor, and
Hoover's eriastrum incidental to exploratory oil well drilling
operations and associated production operations on the 640-acre West
Landslide oil field. The proposed permit also would authorize future
incidental take of the San Joaquin antelope squirrel, short-nosed
kangaroo rat, western burrowing owl, and recurved larkspur, currently
unlisted species, should any of them become listed under the Endangered
Species Act in the future. Collectively the listed and unlisted species
addressed in the Plan are referred to as the ``covered species'' for
the West Landslide project. Authority under the Endangered Species Act
for direct take of California condor is not requested. It is requested
that authority be given for minimal harassment of California condor
that may inadvertently result if condors are ever present in the Plan
Area.
The project will occur in two phases. For Phase 1, Seneca and Enron
will drill an exploratory well on the West Landslide property. Phase I
activities are expected to disturb up to 3.3 acres of land. If the
exploratory well is successful, Phase II will be initiated. For Phase
II, Seneca and Enron will construct and operate up to ten (10)
additional wells and related pipelines, roads, power lines, and a tank
setting. Phase II activities are expected to disturb a maximum of 17.7
acres in addition to the Phase I disturbed area. Therefore, the maximum
area that will potentially be disturbed during both Phase I and Phase
II of the project is 21 acres.
Biological surveys to determine if listed species are present were
not conducted. Instead, Seneca and Enron assumed that species are
present because appropriate habitat is present, and because
distribution mapping indicates that the species could occur on the West
Landslide property. Seneca and Enron concluded that the construction
and operation of oil wells and related infrastructure may result in
incidental take of listed species.
Seneca and Enron will avoid and minimize impacts to listed species
by conducting pre- and post-project surveys, project monitoring and
reporting, and restoration. Detailed avoidance and minimization
measures are presented in the Plan.
In addition, Seneca and Enron will mitigate for habitat
disturbance. Seneca and Enron estimate that approximately 14 acres of
disturbance may be considered permanent and approximately 7 acres of
disturbance may be temporary. Compensation for disturbances considered
permanent will occur at a 3:1 ratio (3 acres preserved for every 1 acre
disturbed). Compensation for temporary disturbances will occur at a
1.1:1 ratio. To compensate for the loss of habitat for the listed
species during Phase I activities, Seneca and Enron propose to fund the
permanent protection and management of 10 acres of similar habitat at
the ARCO Coles Levee Ecosystem Preserve or other Service-approved site.
To compensate for Phase II development, if it is undertaken, Seneca and
Enron propose to fund the permanent protection and management of
between 12 and 53 acres of similar habitat at the ARCO Coles Levee
Ecosystem Preserve or other Service-approved site. In addition, Seneca
and Enron will implement adaptive management measures if a review of
the implemented avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures
indicate that specific adjustments would be beneficial to listed
species. Seneca and Enron will clean up any oil spills immediately,
deal with fires appropriately, and compensate for any loss of habitat
that occurs in the event
[[Page 30248]]
of a spill or fire with the prescribed mitigation ratios.
The Environmental Assessment considers the environmental
consequences of three alternatives. Alternative one, the proposed
action, consists of the issuance of an incidental take permit to Seneca
and Enron, and implementation of the Habitat Conservation Plan and its
Implementing Agreement. This alternative is preferred because: (1) it
satisfies the purpose and needs of the Service, Seneca, and Enron; (2)
measures have been incorporated to avoid and minimize incidental take
to the greatest practicable extent; and (3) unavoidable impacts are
mitigated by the permanent protection of between 10 to 63 acres of
habitat at an approved preserve site.
Alternative 2 consists of development of oil production facilities
on an alternative site. This alternative was not selected as the
preferred alternative because any other areas suitable for oil
production in this portion of California will have similar listed
species concerns. Under the No Action Alternative, the Service would
not issue an incidental take permit. No oil well development and
production would take place and no incidental take of listed species
would occur. In addition, no habitat would be permanently protected
through purchase of credits at an approved preserve. Therefore the No
Action Alternative was not selected as the preferred alternative.
This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(a) of the Endangered
Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). The Service will evaluate the application,
associated documents, and comments submitted thereon to determine
whether the application meets the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act regulations and section 10(a) of the
Endangered Species Act. If it is determined that the requirements are
met, a permit will be issued for the incidental take of the listed
species. The final permit decision will be made no sooner than 30 days
from the date of this notice.
Dated: May 26, 1998.
Michael J. Spear,
Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 98-14667 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.