Announcement of Program Test: Importer Compliance Monitoring Program
Federal RegisterApr 24, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Customs Service
Announcement of Program Test: Importer Compliance Monitoring
Program
AGENCY: Customs Service, Treasury.
ACTION: General notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces Customs plan to conduct a test regarding
the Importer Compliance Monitoring Program (formerly known as the
Importer Self-Governance Program) with limited participation. The
program is intended to promote compliance with Customs laws and
regulations regarding cargo processing and will afford mutual benefits
to both Customs and the import community. Public comments concerning
any aspect of this planned test are solicited.
EFFECTIVE DATES: The program test will commence no earlier than July 1,
1998, and will continue through June 30, 1999. Written requests to
participate in, and comments on, the program test must be received by
June 1, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Written requests to participate in the program test, and
written comments regarding any aspect of the planned test, should be
addressed to William F. Inch, Regulatory Audit Division, U.S. Customs
Service, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Room 6.3A, Washington, D.C.
20229.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William F. Inch, (202) 927-1100;
Joseph C. Palmer, (312) 353-1213, Ext. 106; or Richard A. Fuller, (281)
985-6781.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Since passage of the Customs Modernization provisions (107 Stat.
2170) contained in the North American Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182, 107 Stat. 2057, December 8, 1993),
the primary goal of the trade compliance process has been to maximize
importer compliance with U.S. trade laws, while facilitating the
importation and entry of admissible merchandise. To meet these
challenges, Customs has undertaken a comprehensive effort to review,
improve, and redesign the trade compliance process using established
business practices, re-engineered tools, and new methodologies that
improve customer service without compromising the enforcement aspect of
the Customs mission.
One of the new methodologies developed is the compliance assessment
procedure. This procedure allows Customs to determine the level of
[[Page 20443]]
compliance based on an overall assessment of a company's import
operations. While the compliance assessment procedure provides both
Customs and the company with an accurate benchmark concerning the
adequacy of systems/internal controls and the degree of importer
compliance, it focuses primarily on the company's last business year
prior to the time the compliance assessment was conducted.
Over time, however, events can occur within a company (e.g.,
mergers, system changes, loss of key personnel) that may potentially
have an effect on its compliance. Accordingly, the Importer Compliance
Monitoring Program (ICMP; formerly known as the Importer Self-
Governance Program) was developed to allow interested importers to
assess their own compliance with Customs laws and regulations. Over the
past several months and after public consultations, Customs has
identified necessary policies and procedures as bases to test this new
program, pursuant to Sec. 101.9(a) of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR
101.9(a)), which permits the implementation of a test program or
procedure designed to evaluate the effectiveness of new technology or
operational procedures regarding the processing of passengers, vessels,
or merchandise. The purpose of this document is to describe the
proposed operation of the ICMP and to invite comments on, and requests
to participate in, the planned ICMP test.
Proposed Importer Compliance Monitoring Program
In general, the ICMP is designed to enhance the cargo processing of
participating importers. The ICMP is voluntary and does not require a
company to have undergone or be scheduled for a Customs compliance
assessment. Once notified of acceptance into the program, a
consultation process will begin with Customs. This is necessary to
ensure that all parties have a mutual understanding of the importer's
business practices and the importer's corresponding relationship to the
program.
Similar to a compliance assessment performed by Customs, the ICMP
is a systemic overview of a company's import operations and includes
both process and transactional reviews of those operations. Ideally, a
group independent of the company's importing function should conduct
these reviews; use of outside professionals for this purpose is not
required but may be done at the discretion of the importer. Process
reviews include an annual preparation or updating of the flowchart and
narrative of the company's import process. In addition, a macro test of
value information is conducted to ensure that the company's import
transactions and those recorded in Customs systems are in general
agreement. Transactional reviews utilize statistical sampling
methodologies that are fully coordinated with Customs during the
consultation process. Sampling errors will be evaluated based on the
number of errors and their materiality and, where applicable, a
compliance improvement plan will be prepared and submitted to Customs
outlining actions taken or proposed to correct the cited deficiencies.
Reports of sampling errors may be treated as prior disclosures under
Part 162 of the Customs Regulations. Test participants are expected to
retain all applicable documentation pertaining to these reviews. As
necessary, Customs will validate the importer's ICMP process and
transactional reviews.
Draft Program Manual
For those companies interested in participating in this test, as
well as those companies wishing only to provide comments to Customs, a
draft ICMP manual will be available on Customs Internet Website. The
Universal Resource Locator (URL) or address for the Customs Internet
Website is http://www.customs.ustreas.gov. The manual provides detailed
ICMP policies and procedures, including additional information
regarding anticipated program benefits accruing to both participants
and Customs. Customs welcomes any and all comments regarding this
document and its contents.
Selection of Test Participants
The test will continue for a period of one year. No more than 50
companies will be allowed to participate in the ICMP test, and Customs
will select the participants in accordance with the criteria set forth
below.
There are three primary selection criteria that will be applied in
the following order:
(1) Companies residing within the Top 250 importers ranked by
entered value in descending order within a Primary Focus Industry (PFI)
that have a Customs assigned Account Manager;
(2) Companies residing within the Top 250 importers ranked by
entered value in descending order within a PFI that do not have a
Customs assigned Account Manager; and
(3) Companies not ranked within the Top 250 importers of any of the
PFI's will be selected on the basis of the highest total entered value.
Under criteria (1) and (2), if companies have the same numerical
ranking in different PFI's, then the company with the highest total
entered value will be selected.
Customs will notify each company in writing of its acceptance or
nonselection to participate in this test no later than June 15, 1998;
companies not selected will be informed of the general reason(s) for
non-selection. If an applicant is denied participation, the applicant
may appeal in writing to Director, Regulatory Audit Division, Office of
Strategic Trade, U.S. Customs Service, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20229, within 10 days of notification by Customs.
To assure the best results possible for evaluation purposes, it is
anticipated that those companies selected to participate in the ICMP
test will complete all related requirements during the one-year test
period. However, because of the voluntary nature of this program, a
company may discontinue its participation in the test at any time.
Removal From Test Participation
During the one-year test period, the appropriate field director of
Regulatory Audit may remove a company from participation in the test
for misconduct involving the following:
(1) Failure by the company to comply with ICMP requirements; or
(2) The presence of documented or alleged fraud, other
investigative activity, or failing to follow applicable Customs laws
and regulations.
Any decision proposing to remove a company from participation in
the test may be appealed in writing to the Director, Regulatory Audit
Division, Office of Strategic Trade, U.S. Customs Service, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20229 within 30 days of
such action. The notice of proposed removal will apprise the company of
the facts or conduct warranting removal. Should the company appeal the
notice of proposed removal, it should address the facts or conduct
charges contained in the notice and state how it does or will achieve
compliance. However, in the case of willfulness or where public health
interests or safety are concerned, the removal may be effective
immediately.
Program Consultation
One of the cornerstones of the ICMP is consultation afforded the
importer by Customs. Prior to beginning the test, Customs will meet
with each selected participant to discuss the company's
[[Page 20444]]
import operations. At this meeting, the nature and frequency of work to
be accomplished during the test period will be identified, thus,
assuring effective planning and assignment of company and Customs
resources and timely completion of the test.
Comments and Evaluation of Test
Customs will review all public comments received concerning any
aspect of the proposed program test and finalize requirements and
procedures in light of those comments before commencing the test.
Approximately 90 days after conclusion of the test, evaluations of the
test will be conducted and final results will be made available to the
public upon request.
Dated: April 20, 1998.
William F. Inch,
Director, Regulatory Audit Division.
[FR Doc. 98-10886 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.