Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, WA, INT-DES 98-17
Federal RegisterApr 22, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, WA, INT-DES
98-17
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft programmatic environmental
impact statement and notice of public hearings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the Department of the Interior, Bureau
of Reclamation (Reclamation), has prepared a draft programmatic
environmental impact statement (Draft PEIS) for implementing provisions
of Phase 2 of the Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project
(Enhancement Project). The purpose of the Enhancement Project is to
meet the competing needs of the Yakima River basin through improved
water conservation and management and other appropriate means. The
Enhancement Project legislation also authorizes actions on the Yakima
Indian Reservation which will result in improvements to their
irrigation system and enhance local resources.
DATES: Written comments on the Draft PEIS must be submitted by July 22,
1998, to the address listed under the Addresses Section. Public
hearings to accept oral comments on the Draft PEIS will be held on June
2, 1998, from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. and from 7 to 9 p.m. in Toppenish,
Washington; and on June 3, 1998, from 1 to 3 p.m. and from 7 to 9 p.m.
in Yakima, Washington.
ADDRESSES: The public hearings will be held at:
Yakima Indian Nation, Eagle Seelatsee Auditorium, 401 Fort
Road, Toppenish, Washington.
DoubleTree Inn, 1507 North First Street, Yakima,
Washington.
Copies of the Draft PEIS are available for inspection at the
following addresses and at libraries in the project vicinity.
Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Columbia Area Office, 1917
Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington 98907.
Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Regional Office,
1150 N. Curtis Road, Suite 100, Boise, Idaho 83706-1234.
Written comments on the Draft PEIS should be submitted to: Mr.
Robert Black D-8580, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Federal Center, PO
Box 25007, Denver, Colorado 80225-0007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Robert Black, Telephone (303) 445-2704.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Those wishing to obtain a copy of the Draft
PEIS or schedule time, in advance, to make oral comments at the
hearing(s) may contact Mr. Black at the above address and telephone or
call toll free to 1-800-861-5443. Speakers will be called in order of
their requests. Requests to comment may also be made at each hearing,
and speakers will be scheduled to follow the advance requests. Oral
comments will be limited to 10 minutes per individual. All oral
comments will be included in the hearing record. Written comments will
be accepted into the hearing record for 14 days following the public
hearing date. These comments may be submitted in addition to review
comments made during the 90-day review period and should be identified
as hearing comments. Special needs assistance requests should be
submitted to Mr. Black by May 15, 1998.
The Draft PEIS evaluates the effects of Title XII of the
Enhancement Project legislation. The provisions and measures of the
Enhancement Project legislation form the parameters and the methods for
achieving the protection, mitigation, and enhancement of fish and
wildlife through improved water management, instream flows, water
quality, the creation and enhancement of wetlands, and improved
reliability of irrigation water supplies. Central to this legislation
is the Yakima River Basin Water Conservation Program which attempts to
balance competing demands on the basin's water supply. This voluntary
program will reduce demands on the available water supply by promoting
conservation measures to improve the efficiency of water delivery and
use, instream flows for fish and wildlife, and the reliability of the
irrigation water supply.
Specific measures that will be implemented depend upon proposals
contained in the water conservation
[[Page 19945]]
plans, feasibility investigations of measures selected for
consideration, and program criteria. Consequently, the Draft PEIS is a
broad scope document to provide ``umbrella'' coverage for implementing
the Enhancement Project with subsequent tiering for NEPA compliance of
specific follow-on actions, as appropriate.
Six alternatives, including no action, are considered in the Draft
PEIS. The no action alternative is presented as the most likely future
condition that could be expected without the implementation of
additional Title XII provisions beyond the currently established
riverflows, which includes the new operational criteria required by the
legislation. This alternative provided the basis for impact
comparisons. Five action alternatives present the implementation of all
elements of the Enhancement Project at different levels of
implementation of project components. A preferred alternative has not
been selected in the Draft PEIS. Alternative 1 includes implementation
of all the Enhancement Project measures except the Basin Conservation
Program. Alternative 2 consists of all the measures cited in
Alternative 1 plus different levels (Alternatives 2A, 2B, and 2C) of
water conservation program implementation at various locations within
the Yakima basin. Alternative 2A consists of all the measures cited in
Alternative 1 plus a 7.5-percent basin-wide reduction in diversion
demand (except for the Wapato Irrigation Project and the Yakima-Tieton
Canal). Alternative 2B consists of all the measures cited in
Alternative 1 plus a 15-percent reduction in diversion demand from the
Yakima River downstream from the Roza Diversion Dam (except for the
Wapato Irrigation Project and the Yakima-Tieton Canal). Alternative 2C
consists of all the measures cited in Alternative 1 plus a 21-percent
reduction in diversion demand at diversion points between the Sunnyside
and Roza Canals. Alternative 3 consists of all the measures cited in
Alternative 1 except for implementation of the Kachess Reservoir
augmentation and specific tributary measures.
Environmental consequences that would result from implementation of
any of the alternatives should have no significant adverse impacts,
such that irrigation contracts will not be modified and any minor
adverse impacts identified could be mitigated to a level of
insignificance by implementation of mitigation measures. Beneficial
impacts are considered to be enhanced water quality, increased
streamflow, and overall reinforcement of fish and wildlife habitat, as
well as an increase in the reliability of irrigation water supplies.
Dated: April 13, 1998.
John W. Keys, III,
Regional Director, Pacific Northwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-10631 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.