Determination Not To Revoke Antidumping Duty Orders and Findings Nor To Terminate Suspended Investigations

Federal RegisterMar 7, 1997

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Determination Not To Revoke Antidumping Duty Orders and Findings

Nor To Terminate Suspended Investigations

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Determination not to revoke antidumping duty orders and

findings nor to terminate suspended investigations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is notifying the public of its

determination not to revoke the antidumping duty orders and findings

nor to terminate the suspended investigations listed below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed

under Antidumping Proceeding at: Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street &

Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Commerce (the Department)

may revoke an antidumping duty order or finding or terminate a

suspended investigation, pursuant to 19 CFR Sec. 353.25(d)(4)(iii), if

no interested party has requested an administrative review for four

consecutive annual anniversary months and no domestic interested party

objects to the revocation or requests an administrative review.

We had not received a request to conduct an administrative review

for the most recent four consecutive annual anniversary months.

Therefore, pursuant to Sec. 353.25(d)(4)(i) of the Department's

regulations, on November 27, 1996, we published in the Federal Register

a notice of intent to revoke these antidumping duty orders and findings

and to terminate the suspended investigations and served written notice

of the intent to each domestic interested party on the Department's

service list in each case. Within the specified time frame, we received

objections from domestic interested parties to our intent to revoke

these antidumping duty orders and findings and to terminate the

suspended investigations. Therefore, because domestic interested

parties objected to our intent to revoke or terminate, we no longer

intend to revoke these antidumping duty orders and findings or to

terminate the suspended investigations.

Antidumping Proceeding

A-351-602

Brazil

Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings

Objection Date: December 12, 1996, December 13, 1996

Objector: Hackney Inc., Tube Forgings of America Inc., et al

Contact: Thomas Schauer at (202) 482-4852

A-428-062

Germany

Animal Glue and Inedible Gelatin

Objection Date: December 27, 1996

Objector: Hudson Industries Corporation

Contact: Tom Killiam at (202) 482-2704

A-588-809

Japan

Business Telephone Systems

Objection Date: December 30, 1996

Objector: Lucent Technologies Inc.

Contact: Hermes Pinilla at (202) 482-4733

A-588-405

Japan

Cellular Mobile Telephones and Subassemblies

Objection Date: December 11, 1996

Objector: Motorola Inc.

Contact: Charles Riggle at (202) 482-0650

A-588-811

Japan

Drafting Machines and Parts Thereof

Objection Date: December 6, 1996

Objector: Vemco Corporation

Contact: Mathew Blaskovich at (202) 482-5831

A-588-068

Japan

Steel Wire Strand

Objection Date: December 18, 1996

Objector: Florida Wire & Cable Company

Contact: Kris Campbell at (202) 482-3813

A-614-502

New Zealand

Low-Fuming Brazing Copper Rod & Wire

Objection Date: December 6, 1996

Objector: Copper & Brass Fabricators Council

Contact: Tamara Underwood at (202) 482-0197

A-583-508

Taiwan

Porcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware

Objection Date: December 23, 1996

Objector: General Housewares Corporation

[[Page 10524]]

Contact: Amy Wei at (202) 482-1131

Dated: February 26, 1997.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 97-5628 Filed 3-6-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.