Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures-Productivity Adjustment
Federal RegisterFeb 18, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 4)]
Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures-Productivity Adjustment
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
ACTION: Proposed adoption of a railroad cost recovery procedures
productivity adjustment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board proposes to adopt 1.050
(5.0%) as the measure of average growth in railroad productivity for
the 1991-1995 (5-year) period. The current value of 5.9% was developed
for the 1990 to 1994 period.
DATES: Comments are due by March 5, 1997.
EFFECTIVE DATE: The proposed productivity adjustment is effective 30
days after the date of service.
ADDRESSES: Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Surface
Transportation Board, Washington, D.C. 20423.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Jeff Warren, (202) 927-6243. TDD
for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision write to,
call, or pick up in person from: DC NEWS & DATA, INC., Room 2229, 1201
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423, telephone (202) 289-
4357. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD
services (202) 927-5721.]
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the
human environment or energy conservation.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Decided: February 6, 1997.
By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3933 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.