Fatty-Piper Access Requests Project, Flathead National Forest, Swan Lake Ranger District, Lake County, Montana
Federal RegisterDec 19, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Fatty-Piper Access Requests Project, Flathead National Forest,
Swan Lake Ranger District, Lake County, Montana
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Flathead National Forest, Swan Lake Ranger District, will
prepare an environmental impact statement on a proposal to grant
easements and authorize construction of roads across National Forest
System lands in the Cedar Creek, Fatty Creek, and Piper Creek
watersheds. The action is proposed in response to an applicant seeking
permanent, roaded access to approximately 1,760 acres of non-federal
land located within the Flathead National Forest boundary. The
requested easements are located roughly 20 miles south of Swan Lake,
Montana. The non-federal land to be accessed is located in sections 9,
15, and 23, Township 22 North, Range 18 West and section 35, Township
23 North, Range 18 West, Lake County, Montana. The easements are
requested on National Forest System lands in sections 4, 10, and 14,
Township 22 North, Range 18 West and section 34, Township 23 North,
Range 18 West. The proposed project will be in compliance with the
direction in the Flathead National Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan (December, 1985), which provides the overall guidance for
management of the area. The agency gives written notice of this
analysis so that interested and affected people are aware of how they
may participate and contribute to the final decision.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received
in writing at the address shown below by January 23, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to Charles E. Harris, District
Ranger, Swan Lake Ranger District, 200 Ranger Station Road, Bigfork,
Montana 59911.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about this environmental impact statement should be directed
to Dennis McCarthy, Planning Team Leader, Swan Lake Ranger District,
200 Ranger Station Road, Bigfork, Montana 59911; phone (406) 837-7500.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Swan Lake Ranger District is initiating
this action in response to four applications filed by Plum Creek Timber
Company, L.P. (Plum Creek). Plum Creek requested rights-of-way across
Forest Service lands for the purpose of establishing permanent, roaded
access to approximately 1,760 acres in four sections of Plum Creek
land. The applications involve requests for five segments of road
totaling approximately three miles across Forest Service land. Plum
Creek has stated that it intends to manage these sections of land for
long-term timber production using conventional ground-based logging
systems and build roads on the permitted rights-of-way, sufficient to
support timber production.
Plum Creek has no roaded access to two of the sections of land,
which are surrounded by National Forest System lands. Plum Creek has
limited access to the other two sections and has requested additional
roaded access to them. Plum Creek seeks permanent, roaded access
pursuant to federal regulations at 36 CFR part 251 (subpart D--Access
to Non-Federal Lands), 36 CFR part 212 (Ingress and Egress) and the
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) and its
implementing regulations.
Swan Lake Ranger District personnel invited comments on the
environmental analysis for this project in September, 1996, by sending
a scoping notice to people on the District's mailing list.
Subsequently, District personnel determined that they should prepare an
environmental impact statement. The comments received in response to
the September, 1996 scoping will be taken into consideration along with
comments received on the draft environmental impact statement. Some of
the issues identified include impacts to: Water quality; soils and
slope stability; air quality; proximity to the Mission Mountains
Wilderness; threatened, endangered, and sensitive animal, plant, and
fish species and habitat (i.e., grizzly bear, bull trout, water
howellia); old-growth forests; roadless area; and recreational
experiences.
Swan Lake Ranger District personnel will be seeking information,
comments, and assistance from Federal, State, and local agencies and
other individuals or organizations who may be interested in or affected
by the proposed actions. The scoping period for the draft environmental
impact statement will extend to January 23, 1998. This information will
be used in preparation of the draft environmental impact statement.
The draft environmental impact statement will be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency and will be made available for public
review in February, 1998. At that time, copies of the draft
environmental impact statement will be distributed to interested and
affected agencies, organizations, and members of the public for their
review and comment. The Environmental Protection Agency will publish a
notice of availability of the draft environmental impact statement in
the Federal Register. The comment period will be no less than 45 days
from the date that appears in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes it is important to give reviewers
notice at this early stage of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation v. NRDC, 435 U.S.
519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at
the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (8th Circuit, 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris,
490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the environmental
impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful
if comments refer to specific pages of chapters of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
[[Page 66595]]
The final environmental impact statement is scheduled to be
completed by May, 1998. In the final environmental impact statement,
the Swan Lake Ranger District is required to respond to comments and
responses received during the comment period that pertain to the
environmental consequences discussed in the draft environmental impact
statement and applicable laws, regulations and policies considered in
making the decision regarding this proposal. Charles E. Harris,
District Ranger, Swan Lake Ranger District, is the responsible official
and his decision and reasons for this decision will be documented in
the Record of Decision. The decision will be subject to Forest Service
appeal regulations (36 CFR 215).
Dated: December 8, 1997.
Charles E. Harris,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 97-33062 Filed 12-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.