Hybrid Seed Crop Insurance Regulations; and Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Hybrid Seed Corn Crop Insurance Provisions

Federal RegisterDec 12, 1997

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

7 CFR Parts 443 and 457

RIN 0563-AA78

Hybrid Seed Crop Insurance Regulations; and Common Crop Insurance

Regulations, Hybrid Seed Corn Crop Insurance Provisions

AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) finalizes

specific crop provisions for the insurance of hybrid seed corn. The

provisions will be used in conjunction with the Common Crop Insurance

Policy, Basic Provisions, which contain standard terms and conditions

common to most crops. The intended effect of this action is to provide

policy changes to better meet the needs of the insured, include the

current hybrid seed crop insurance regulations under the Common Crop

[[Page 65345]]

Insurance Policy for ease of use and consistency of terms, and to

restrict the effect of the current hybrid seed crop insurance

regulations to the 1997 and prior crop years.

DATES: Effective December 12, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Nesheim, Insurance Management

Specialist, Research and Development, Product Development Division,

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, United States Department of

Agriculture, 9435 Holmes Road, Kansas City, MO 64131, telephone (816)

926-7730.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Executive Order No. 12866

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined this rule

to be exempt for the purposes of Executive Order No. 12866 and,

therefore, this rule has not been reviewed by OMB.

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507),

those collections of information have been approved by the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) under control number 0563-0053.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public

Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the

effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal

governments and the private sector. This rule contains no Federal

mandates (under the regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for

State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore,

this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of

the UMRA.

Executive Order No. 12612

It has been determined under section 6(a) of Executive Order No.

12612, Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient federalism

implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The

provisions contained in this rule will not have a substantial direct

effect on States or their political subdivisions, or on the

distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of

government.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

This regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities. The effect of this regulation on

small entities will be no greater than on larger entities. Under the

current regulations, a producer is required to complete an application

and acreage report. If the crop is damaged or destroyed, the insured is

required to give notice of loss and provide the necessary information

to complete a claim for indemnity. This regulation does not alter those

requirements.

The amount of work required of the insurance companies delivering

and servicing these policies will not increase significantly from the

amount of work currently required. This rule does not have any greater

or lesser impact on the producer. Therefore, this action is determined

to be exempt from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5

U.S.C. 605), and no Regulatory Flexibility Analysis was prepared.

Federal Assistance Program

This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic

Assistance under No. 10.450.

Executive Order No. 12372

This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order

No. 12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and

local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,

published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.

Executive Order No. 12988

This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive

Order No. 12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule

will not have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will

preempt State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws

are inconsistent herewith. The administrative appeal provisions

published at 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted before any action against

FCIC for judicial review may be brought.

Environmental Evaluation

This action is not expected to have a significant impact on the

quality of the human environment, health, and safety. Therefore,

neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact

Statement is needed.

National Performance Review

This regulatory action is being taken as part of the National

Performance Review Initiative to eliminate unnecessary or duplicative

regulations and improve those that remain in force.

Background

On Thursday, January 2, 1997, FCIC published a proposed rule in the

Federal Register at 62 FR 48 to add to the Common Crop Insurance

Regulations (7 CFR part 457), a new section, 7 CFR 457.152 (Hybrid Seed

Corn Crop Insurance Provisions). These provisions will replace and

supersede the current provisions for insuring hybrid seed corn found at

7 CFR part 443 and will be effective for the 1998 and succeeding crop

years. This rule also amends 7 CFR part 443 to restrict its effect to

the 1997 and prior crop years.

Following publication of the proposed rule, the public was afforded

60 days to submit written comments. A total of 37 comments were

received from reinsured companies and an insurance service

organization. The comments received, and FCIC's responses, follow:

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

stated that the current hybrid seed policy limits the amount of other

insurance which can be carried on hybrid seed corn to one and a half

times the maximum amount of insurance available. Since no such

restriction appears in this 1998 proposal, the commenter assumes that

this is no longer applicable and supports not having this restriction

in the policy.

Response: The policy provision that limited the amount of other

insurance to one and a half times the highest price election has been

deleted. This deletion will be identified in the Summary of Changes

when the new policy is issued.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

suggested that the name of the Crop Provisions be changed to ``hybrid

seed corn'' rather than ``hybrid corn seed''. Everyone in the seed corn

industry refers to it as hybrid seed corn.

Response: FCIC has made the change accordingly.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

suggested that the definition of ``Amount of insurance per acre'' be

revised to match how this coverage is shown and defined in the Special

Provisions, although the commenter stated that the Special Provisions

definition should be multiplied by the price election before

subtracting the minimum guaranteed payment. The county yield is

multiplied by the factor for the coverage level selected, which is

multiplied by the price election selected by the producer less any

minimum guaranteed payment.

Response: FCIC has revised and clarified the definition to show the

proper calculation. Since the calculation is in the Crop Provisions, it

will be removed from the Special Provisions.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

were concerned about the definition of ``bushel'' and the provisions in

section 12(g)(3) (redesignated section 12(f)(3))

[[Page 65346]]

that requires the insurance provider to work the claim in the same

manner as the records provided by the seed company to establish the

approved yield. Since the yields from the seed company are submitted to

the FCIC Regional Service Office (RSO) for determination of the

approved yield, the FCIC RSO needs to inform the insurance providers

when a seed company is using its own conversion charts and what this

chart is so that, at claim time, the production to count can be

converted in the same manner as the approved yield was determined.

Response: In order to ensure the accuracy of any claim, the same

moisture and weight per bushel must be used to calculate the amount of

insurance and the production to count. The FCIC procedure will specify

that the seed company will provide its conversion chart with the

production records. FCIC will provide the conversion chart to the

insurance provider when the moisture or weight used to determine a

bushel differs from the definition stated in the policy.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

were concerned with the definition of ``female parent plants,'' where

there is reference to the stamens (tassles) being removed. The

commenters indicated that some seed companies are experimenting with

male sterile plants from which the stamens may not have to be removed.

Response: FCIC has revised the definition to accommodate those

instances wherein parent plants are rendered male sterile by means

other than detassling.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

suggested that the definition of ``interplanting'' be revised to match

its use in the Special Provisions. Interplanting is listed as a

separate type with a different county yield than standard planting. The

male parent plants are planted between every female parent plant row

rather than in a planting pattern as defined in the Crop Provisions.

Response: The Special Provisions uses the term ``interplanting''

and the Crop Provisions uses the term ``interplanted'', and both terms

have different meanings. To avoid any confusion between these terms,

FCIC will change the reference to ``interplanting'' to ``non-standard

planting'' in the Special Provisions.

Comment: A reinsured company suggested that in the definition of

``irrigated practice,'' the words ``and quality'' be added after the

words ``* * * providing the quantity.''

Response: FCIC agrees that water quality is important. However,

there are no clear criteria regarding the quality of water necessary to

produce a crop. The highly variable factors involved would make such

criteria difficult to develop and administer. The provisions regarding

good farming practices can be applied in situations in which the

insured failed to exercise due care and diligence in the application of

irrigation water. Therefore, no change has been made.

Comment: An insurance service organization suggested adding, in the

definition of ``non-seed amount,'' the phrase ``(rejected for seed

purposes)'' or something similar after the first reference to ``non-

seed production'' for clarification.

Response: FCIC has revised the definitions and section 12 to

clarify that non-seed production is production that does not qualify as

seed production because of inadequate germination.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

suggested that the definition of ``planted acreage'' be amended to

require that the male and female parent plants be planted in accordance

with the production management practices of the seed company.

Response: The definition of ``planted acreage'' is broad enough to

permit planting in accordance with practices of the seed company. The

requirement that parent plants be planted in accordance with the

production management practices of the seed company is more appropriate

in sections 7 and 10 regarding insured crop and causes of loss and

those provisions have been revised accordingly.

Comment: An insurance service organization suggested that a

conflict exists between the definition of ``sample'' and ``inadequate

germination'' because the germination rate is determined by using a

certified seed test on clean seed, not field run seed.

Response: There is no conflict between the terms. The sample must

be at least 3 pounds of field run seed. The germination rate is based

on the amount of clean seed obtained from that sample. No change has

been made.

Comment: An insurance service organization asked why a ``seed

company'' must now be a corporation (previously defined as a ``business

enterprise''), and if there are any legitimate seed companies that are

not corporations.

Response: A seed company need only be a corporation if the seed

company is also the producer. To cover all other situations, FCIC has

changed ``a corporation'' to ``a business enterprise'' in the

definition of ``seed company.''

Comment: An insurance service organization suggested that section

2(a) be rearranged as follows: ``* * * a basic unit, as defined in

section 1 of the Basic Provisions, may be divided * * *'' (instead of

``(basic unit))'' at the end of the earlier phrase.

Response: All definitions and those provisions common to most crops

with respect to units have been deleted and moved to the Basic

Provisions.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

stated that the provisions contained in section 2(e)(1), which require

the insured to keep records by optional unit for optional units to

apply, conflict with section 3(b) which correctly indicates that

production reporting requirements do not apply to this crop. In most

instances the seed corn is harvested and hauled directly to the seed

companies' processing facilities. The seed company maintains records of

planted acreage and harvested production and provides all of the yield

records used by the FCIC RSO to establish the approved yields. All

references to the insured maintaining records by optional unit should

not be a requirement since this is maintained at the seed company

level. The historical yield of the producer's seed corn is not used to

establish the amount of insurance as stated in this item as this is

based on the county yield, coverage level and price elected and any

minimum guaranteed payment. Seed corn producers will often plant

different varieties from year to year with different expected yields.

Therefore, the actual yield produced from the previous year has little

or no value for the producer in subsequent years.

Response: The insured must have verifiable records of planted

acreage and production for each optional unit for at least the ``* * *

last crop year used to determine the amount of insurance''. This

requirement should not be removed simply because the seed company

maintains those records. In order to protect the integrity of the

program, FCIC must be able to verify the accuracy of the guarantee for

each unit. If the producer cannot produce the records from each

optional unit, they will be combined into basic units. The insured can

obtain the necessary records from the seed company. These provisions

have been deleted and moved to the Basic Provisions.

Comment: A reinsured company was concerned about the requirement

that the producer must meet all the requirements in section 6. They

stated

[[Page 65347]]

that these requirements should not be mandatory for every acreage

report.

Response: The information required by the acreage report is

necessary to establish liability, premium, and insurability of the

acreage. No change has been made.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

mentioned that in section 6(a), each individual producer is the named

insured under this program and may not know the type or variety of

hybrid. The seed companies provide the seed and the producer grows it.

Seed companies do not want this information going any further than

necessary while still meeting the requirements of the MPCI program.

This information is needed only in the event of a claim and can be

obtained from the seed company as needed at that time. The commenter

believes collection of this information should be an option since the

insurance provider may want to capture it in certain instances but not

for all insureds. Therefore, this should be an option, not mandatory as

it would be with the word ``must'' in the proposed language.

Response: The reporting requirement by type or variety must be

maintained for rating purposes and to determine liability and premium

for the unit. Such information cannot be obtained only at the time of

loss. It is the responsibility of the producer to provide the

information which should be contained in the hybrid seed corn processor

contract. No change has been made.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

mentioned that section 6(b) requires that acreage occupied by the male

parent plants be reported. They realize it is common for other crops to

obtain all insurable and uninsurable acreage of the crop. However, this

stipulation to capture the total acreage occupied by the male parent

plants is an unnecessary and burdensome requirement for hybrid seed

corn. The commenter suggested that this should be determined in the

event of a claim. A number of seed companies require that the male

acres be destroyed after pollination.

Response: The requirement to report any acreage occupied by male

parent plants is necessary to determine the correct amount of insurance

for a unit since acres with male plants are not insurable. The amount

of insurance is determined on the Summary of Coverage so the insurance

provider cannot wait until a loss to determine insurable acreage. The

burden of determining the amount of acreage occupied by the male plant

can be minimized by mathematical calculation based on the planting

pattern of the crop. No change has been made.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

questioned section 6(c), which requires the insured to certify that

there is a hybrid seed corn processor contract and the amount of any

minimum guaranteed payment. The commenter questions what constitutes

certification. It is their feeling that if the insured goes through the

FCIC RSO to obtain an approved yield, and upon receiving copies of this

information, this would be adequate certification as to the insured

having a contract. The presumption is that the FCIC RSO would not go

through this process between the producer and the seed company if there

was not some type of contractual agreement in place. If they obtain

some of this information directly from the seed company it would also

constitute certification as the seed company would not provide this

information if a contract was not in place. If this does not constitute

certification for the purposes of having a contract then they have some

concerns as to what additional requirements must be met.

Response: The certification requirement is satisfied by a written

statement on the acreage report, signed by the producer, that such a

contract exists. In many cases, the RSO provides an approved yield for

a variety, not specifically for individual producers. Since a contract

is a condition of insurance, the insurance provider must have some

assurance that a contract exists. Receipt of an approved yield from the

RSO is not evidence of a contract between the processor and the

producer. No change has been made.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

were concerned with section 6(c) references to the minimum guaranteed

payment which, according to the Crop Insurance Handbook, must be

obtained from each insured. If an insurance company happens to insure

all producers of a seed company, there is generally only one base

contract which is used for all the individual seed corn producers. If

the base contract does not provide a minimum guarantee, each insured is

still required to certify to this effect even though this information

can be determined from the base contract.

Response: Section 6(c) only requires the producer to report a

minimum guaranteed payment if the hybrid seed corn processor contract

contains such a payment. No change has been made.

Comment: An insurance service organization asked if all the

exceptions in section 7(a)(4)(I)-(iv) should be required by written

agreement. For example, the commenter questions why acreage with female

and male parent plants in the same row would ever be insurable. Perhaps

the phrase ``unless allowed'' should be removed from item (4) and

inserted at the specific items where it is actually possible.

Response: Current planting practices do not allow male and female

plants to be planted in the same row. However, acceptable planting

practices may change and the provision must allow a certain amount of

flexibility to cover such changes. No change has been made.

Comment: A reinsured company questioned section 7(c) pertaining to

a producer who is also the seed company. If a seed corn producer is

insured as an individual, and also owns the seed corn company under a

corporate name and the company contracts with other producers, the

commenter questions whether this situation would fall into the

procedure outlined.

Response: If the other conditions in section 7(c) are met, the seed

company could be eligible for insurance. Section 7(c) has been amended

for clarification.

Comment: An insurance service organization asked that since ``seed

company,'' by definition, is required to be a corporation, whether it

is necessary to repeat the requirement again in section 7(c)(1).

Response: A seed company is no longer required to be a corporation

except when the seed company is also the producer. FCIC has revised the

definition of ``seed company'' to specify business enterprise and added

a provision requiring a seed company that is also an insured to be a

corporation.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

were concerned with section 7(c)(3) which states that if acceptable

sales records are not available, the crop may only be insured under the

Coarse Grains Crop Provisions. Since the yield potential for seed corn

is considerably less than for commercial field corn, a normal seed corn

crop could be harvested and still potentially have a payable loss under

the Coarse Grains Crop Provisions. Language similar to ``* * * may only

be insured by written agreement * * *'' is recommended.

Response: FCIC agrees that hybrid seed corn is best suited for

insurance under the Hybrid Seed Corn Crop Provision, but records must

be provided to assure that the person seeking insurance is a bona-fide

producer of hybrid seed corn. If the crop is insured under the Coarse

Grains Crop Provisions, the approved yield would be derived from hybrid

seed corn production records of the processor for

[[Page 65348]]

the particular variety. The last sentence of section 7(c)(3) has been

revised to read ``If such records are not available, the crop may be

insured under the Coarse Grains Crop Provisions with a written

agreement; and * * *.''

Comment: An insurance service organization asked if it is necessary

that the phrase ``Of the insured crop'' be specified in section 8(c)

but not for items (a) or (b).

Response: FCIC has clarified the provisions. Further, since damage

to the male plant could also necessitate replanting, FCIC has modified

section 8(c) to include both male and female parent plants.

Comment: An insurance service organization stated that the phrase

``insurance attaches after'' in section 9(a) creates an ambiguity with

respect to when insurance attaches. The commenter suggested that the

term ``after'' could be changed to ``once'' (or ``upon completion of

planting:'') and then delete ``is completely planted'' from items (1)

and (2).

Response: Section 9(a) has been clarified.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

stated that the provisions in section 11(a) stipulate that any

representative samples must consist of one complete planting pattern

the entire length of the field if the acreage will not be harvested.

The commenters prefer that each representative sample be one complete

pattern which is long enough to provide a \1/100\ acre sample, and that

these be at various representative areas of the field rather than the

entire length of the field. This would be consistent with the appraisal

methods specified in the loss adjustment procedures.

Response: More than one representative sample may be required by

the insurance provider, and such samples may be in different parts of

the field. However, by having a strip the entire length of the field,

the loss adjuster can choose the areas to be sampled and is not

restricted to the crop the insured chose to leave for this purpose.

This permits a more accurate appraisal. Further, it would be difficult

for the person harvesting the crop to know what constitutes \1/100\ of

an acre. No change has been made.

Comment: An insurance service organization suggested that since the

Basic Provisions state that the term ``representative sample'' will be

further defined in the Crop Provisions, it should be included in

section 1 with the other definitions (as in the 1986-CHIAA 738) so the

term would be more easily located.

Response: The requirements for representative samples are

substantive and, therefore, should not be in the definition section.

The Basic Provisions are revised to amend the definition to state ``as

specified in the Crop Provisions''.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

disagreed that section 11(b)(2) should be a mandatory requirement for

all producers having a loss. If all seed corn producers for a seed

company are insured with the same insurance company, the company knows

that all of their producers have a seed corn contract. The company will

already have a copy of the base contract for the seed company and are

not gaining anything by having to obtain the exact contract in effect

for each producer. If some producers insured with an insurance company

grow seed corn for various seed companies (not all of their producers

are insured with them) there may be some benefit in obtaining a copy of

the contract. The commenter does not believe this should be a mandatory

requirement for all losses.

Response: Since not all producers may receive the same contract

terms, the insurance company must verify contract terms, unless it has

been determined that the contract provided by the seed company is used

for all its producers without any waivers or amendments. Section

11(b)(2) has been revised accordingly.

Comment: An insurance service organization suggested that section

12(e)(1)(v) (redesignated section 12(d)(1)(v)) of the policy should not

allow the insured to defer settlement and wait for a later, generally

lower appraisal, especially on crops that have a short ``shelf life.''

Response: A later appraisal will only be necessary if the insurance

provider and the insured do not agree on the appraisal or the insurance

provider believes the crop needs to be carried further. The producer

must continue to care for the crop. If the producer does not care for

the crop, the original appraisal will be used. No change has been made.

Comment: An insurance service organization stated that section

12(e)(2) (redesignated section 12(d)(2)) counts harvested production

delivered to the seed company, whereas section 4d(1)(I) of the 1986-

CHIAA 738 counts harvested production delivered to and accepted by the

seed company. The commenter questioned whether this is change, or

should this provision be interpreted to mean that production is not

considered delivered until it is accepted.

Response: This is a change. Section 12(d)(2) provides that seed

production to be counted includes mature harvested production that is

delivered as commercial hybrid seed corn to the seed company stated in

the hybrid seed corn processor contract, regardless of quality, unless

the production has inadequate germination.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

asked that since there has been a change in amounts for moisture

content (to 15 percent moisture content instead of 15.5 percent, and

increased for ear corn by 1.5 pounds, instead of 2.0 pounds, for each

percentage point of moisture in excess of 14.0 percent) in sections

12(f) (1) and (2), whether FCIC plans any adjustments to previous

yields that were adjusted using the previous amounts.

Response: Previous yield information will not be affected. These

changes will be effective for 1998 and subsequent crop years. Approved

yields after these provisions are effective will be determined on the

revised basis.

Comment: An insurance service organization suggested that section

13(d)(2) may be confusing because a sentence that states ``The unit

consists of 185 acres * * *'' is followed immediately by a sentence

that states ``The unit consists of 150 acres * * *.'' The example would

be clearer if it stated ``The unit consists of 150 acres of female

parent plants of the same type and variety (an additional 35 acres are

occupied by the male parent plants, which are not insurable). Of the

150 acres, 50 acres were planted * * *'' or some similar statement. At

the least, the latter should read ``The unit consists of 150 insurable

acres * * *.''

Response: The late and prevented planting provisions, common to

most crops, are deleted and moved to the Basic Provisions.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

favored the elimination of the substitute crop provisions under

prevented planting coverage.

Response: The late and prevented planting provisions, common to

most crops, are deleted and moved to the Basic Provisions. FCIC has

revised those provisions to remove the substitute crop provisions.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

stated that section 13(d)(5), which defines the maximum eligible

acreage for prevented planting, conflicts with the current provisions,

which correctly states that the maximum eligible acres for seed corn is

the number of acres the producer contracted for the crop year.

[[Page 65349]]

Response: FCIC has clarified the provision in the Basic Provisions.

Comment: A reinsured company stated that it understands that FCIC

is revising prevented planting for 1998 and assumes these new

provisions would be incorporated into the crop provisions for hybrid

seed corn.

Response: The late and prevented planting provisions have been

moved to the Basic Provisions and will be applicable to this policy.

Comment: A reinsured company and an insurance service organization

recommended deleting section 14(d). Written agreements should not be

limited to one year. Rather, such agreements should be valid for the

period stated in the agreement. In most cases, written agreements

should be continuous, as is the case with the policy. Limiting written

agreements to one year only increases administrative cost, complexity

and opportunity for misunderstanding and error.

Response: Written agreements are, by design, temporary and intended

to address unusual circumstances. If the conditions that require a

written agreement exists for multiple crop years, the policy or Special

Provisions should be amended to accommodate the conditions. The written

agreement provisions have been deleted and moved to the Basic

Provisions.

Comment: An insurance service organization suggested that section

14(e) be combined with the provisions in section 14(a).

Response: Section 14(e) is intended to be a limited exception, not

the rule, affecting only those cases in which conditions discovered

after the sales closing date make a written agreement necessary.

Therefore, these provisions should be kept separate. No change has been

made in the Basic Provisions.

Comment: A reinsured company expressed a general concern about many

of the mandatory requirements added to these provisions. In its view,

most of these requirements are unnecessary. Failure to collect this

information in prior years has not caused problems. The issues of

reduced expense reimbursement and simplification should be considered

prior to finalizing these provisions. This policy proposes to increase

the expense of writing hybrid seed corn along with the added complexity

involved from the additional collection requirements.

Response: FCIC understands the concerns of this commenter. These

Crop Provisions were revised to reduce program vulnerabilities and make

the insuring language more precise. FCIC has attempted to minimize any

additional requirements imposed upon the policyholder, the reinsured

company, and the seed company. All mandatory information is required to

fairly and properly administer the policy.

In addition to the changes described above, FCIC has made minor

editorial changes and has amended the following provisions:

1. The paragraph preceding section 1 has been revised to refer to

the Catastrophic Risk Protection Endorsement for the purpose of

clarification.

2. The definition of ``adjusted yield,'' ``amount of insurance per

acre,'' ``approved yield,'' ``county yield,'' ``dollar value per

bushel,'' ``field run,'' ``hybrid seed corn processor contract,'' and

``insurable interest'' have been revised for clarification.

3. A definition of ``coverage level factor'' has been added for

clarification.

4. The definitions of ``days,'' ``FSA,'' ``final planting date,''

``interplanted,'' ``irrigated practice,'' ``late planted,'' ``late

planting period,'' and ``timely planted'' have been deleted and moved

to the Basic Provisions.

5. The definition of ``good farming practices,'' ``planted

acreage,'' and ``prevented planting'' have been revised to delete the

provisions moved to the Basic Provisions.

6. The definition of ``practical to replant'' has been revised to

clarify that it will not be considered practical to replant unless

production from the replanted acreage can be delivered under the terms

of the hybrid seed corn processor contract, or the seed company agrees

to accept such production.

7. Section 2 has been revised to delete those provisions that have

been moved to the Basic Provisions, and to clarify the unit structure

for hybrid seed corn when the hybrid seed corn processor contract

specifies an amount of production to be delivered.

8. Section 7(d) has been added to allow the insured crop that is

under contract with different seed companies to be insured under

separate policies with different insurance providers provided all

acreage of the insured crop in the county is insured.

9. Section 8(c) has been revised for clarification.

10. In section 10(b)(4), the requirement that the crop be inspected

and the loss appraised before harvest is completed has been deleted to

be consistent with section 11(b)(1).

11. Section 12(c) has been revised for clarification. Also, an

example of an indemnity calculation has been added for illustration.

Section 12(d) is deleted since it was redundant with section 12(e) and

the following section redesignated accordingly.

12. In section 12(e)(1)(I), as redesignated, adjusted yield has

been changed to amount of insurance per acre.

13. In section 12(f)(3), as redesignated, the last sentence has

been corrected to clarify that records of the seed company will only be

used to determine the amount of production to count if the production

is calculated on the same basis as that used to determine the approved

yield.

14. Add provision specifying the prevented planting coverage

available.

Good cause is shown to make this rule effective upon publication in

the Federal Register. This rule improves the hybrid seed corn insurance

coverage and brings it under the Common Crop Insurance Policy, Basic

Provisions for consistency among policies. The earliest contract change

date that can be met for the 1998 crop year is December 31, 1997. It

is, therefore, imperative that these provisions be made final before

that date so that reinsured companies and insureds may have sufficient

time to implement these changes. Therefore, public interest requires

the agency to act immediately to make these provisions available for

the 1998 crop year.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Parts 443 and 457

Crop insurance, Hybrid seed crop insurance regulations, Hybrid seed

corn.

Final Rule

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Federal

Crop Insurance Corporation hereby amends 7 CFR parts 443 and 457 as

follows:

PART 443--HYBRID SEED CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS FOR THE 1986

THROUGH 1997 CROP YEARS

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 443 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).

2. The part heading is revised to read as set forth above.

3. Subpart Heading ``Subpart--Regulations for the 1986 and

Succeeding Crop Years'' is removed.

4. Section 443.7 is amended by revising the introductory text of

paragraph (d) to read as follows:

Sec. 443.7 The application and policy.

* * * * *

(d) The application for the 1986 through 1997 crop years is found

at subpart D of part 400, General Administrative Regulations (7 CFR

400.37 and 400.38). The provisions of the Hybrid Seed Crop Insurance

[[Page 65350]]

Regulations for the 1986 through 1997 crop years are as follows:

* * * * *

PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS; REGULATIONS FOR THE

1994 AND SUBSEQUENT CONTRACT YEARS

5. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).

6. Section 457.152 is added to read as follows:

Sec. 457.152 Hybrid seed corn crop insurance provisions.

The Hybrid Seed Corn Crop Insurance Provisions for the 1998 and

succeeding crop years are as follows:

FCIC policies:

United States Department of Agriculture

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

Reinsured policies:

(Appropriate title for insurance provider)

Both FCIC and reinsured policies:

Hybrid Seed Corn Crop Provisions

If a conflict exists among the policy provisions, the order of

priority is as follows: (1) The Catastrophic Risk Protection

Endorsement, if applicable; (2) the Special Provisions; (3) these

Crop Provisions; and (4) the Basic Provisions, (Sec. 457.8) with (1)

controlling (2), etc.

1. Definitions.

Adjusted yield. An amount determined by multiplying the county

yield by the coverage level factor.

Amount of insurance per acre. A dollar amount determined by

multiplying the adjusted yield by the price election you select and

subtracting any minimum guaranteed payment, not to exceed the total

compensation specified in the hybrid seed corn processor contract.

If your hybrid seed corn processor contract contains a minimum

guaranteed payment that is stated in bushels, we will convert that

value to dollars by multiplying it by the price election you

selected.

Approved yield. In lieu of the definition contained in the Basic

Provisions, an amount FCIC determines to be representative of the

yield that the female parent plants are expected to produce when

grown under a specific production practice. FCIC will establish the

approved yield based upon records provided by the seed company and

other information it deems appropriate.

Bushel. Fifty-six pounds avoirdupois of shelled corn, 70 pound

avoirdupois of ear corn, or the number of pounds determined under

the seed company's normal conversion chart when that chart is used

to determine the approved yield and the claim for indemnity.

Certified seed test. A warm germination test performed on clean

seed according to specifications of the ``Rules for Testing Seeds''

of the Association of Official Seed Analysts.

Commercial hybrid seed corn. The offspring produced by crossing

a male and female parent plant, each having a different genetic

character. This offspring is the product intended for use by an

agricultural producer to produce a commercial field corn crop for

grain.

County yield. An amount contained in the actuarial documents

that is established by FCIC to represent the yield that a producer

of hybrid seed corn would be expected to produce if the acreage had

been planted to commercial field corn.

Coverage level factor. A factor contained in the Special

Provisions to adjust the county yield for commercial field corn to

reflect the higher value of hybrid seed corn.

Dollar value per bushel. An amount that determines the value of

any seed production to count. It is determined by dividing the

amount of insurance per acre by the result of multiplying the

approved yield by the coverage level percentage, expressed as a

decimal.

Female parent plants. Corn plants that are grown for the purpose

of producing commercial hybrid seed corn and have had the stamens

removed or are otherwise male sterile.

Field run. Commercial hybrid seed corn production before it has

been dried, screened, or processed.

Good farming practices. In addition to the definition contained

in the Basic Provisions, good farming practices include those

practices required by the hybrid seed corn processor contract.

Harvest. Combining, threshing or picking ears from the female

parent plants to obtain commercial hybrid seed corn.

Hybrid seed corn processor contract. An agreement executed

between the hybrid seed corn crop producer and a seed company

containing, at a minimum:

(a) The producer's promise to plant and grow male and female

parent plants, and to deliver all commercial hybrid seed corn

produced from such plants to the seed company;

(b) The seed company's promise to purchase the commercial hybrid

seed corn produced by the producer; and

(c) Either a fixed price per unit of measure (bushels,

hundredweight, etc.) of the commercial hybrid seed corn or a formula

to determine the value of such seed. Any formula for establishing

the value must be based on data provided by a public third party

that establishes or provides pricing information to the general

public, based on prices paid in the open market (e.g., commodity

futures exchanges), to be acceptable for the purpose of this policy.

Inadequate germination. Germination of less than 80 percent of

the commercial hybrid seed corn as determined by using a certified

seed test.

Insurable interest. Your share of the financial loss that occurs

in the event seed production is damaged by a cause of loss specified

in section 10.

Local market price. The cash price offered by buyers for any

production from the female parent plants that is not considered

commercial hybrid seed corn under the terms of this policy.

Male parent plants. Corn plants grown for the purpose of

pollinating female parent plants.

Minimum guaranteed payment. A minimum amount (usually stated in

dollars or bushels) specified in your hybrid seed corn processor

contract that will be paid or credited to you by the seed company

regardless of the quantity of seed produced.

Non-seed production. Production that does not qualify as seed

production because of inadequate germination.

Planted acreage. In addition to the definition contained in the

Basic Provisions, the insured crop must be planted in rows wide

enough to permit mechanical cultivation, unless otherwise provided

by the Special Provisions or by written agreement.

Planting pattern. The arrangement of the rows of the male and

female parent plants in a field. An example of a planting pattern is

four consecutive rows of female parent plants followed by two

consecutive rows of male parent plants.

Practical to replant. In addition to the definition contained in

the Basic Provisions, practical to replant applies to either the

female or male parent plant. It will not be considered practical to

replant unless production from the replanted acreage can be

delivered under the terms of the hybrid seed corn processor

contract, or the seed company agrees that it will accept the

production from the replanted acreage.

Prevented planting. In addition to the definition contained in

the Basic Provisions, prevented planting applies to the female and

male parent plants. The male parent plants must be planted in

accordance with the requirements of the hybrid seed corn processor

contract to be considered planted.

Sample. For the purpose of the certified seed test, at least 3

pounds of randomly selected field run shelled corn for each variety

of commercial hybrid seed corn grown on the unit.

Seed company. A business enterprise that possesses all licenses

for marketing commercial hybrid seed corn required by the state in

which it is domiciled or operates, and which possesses facilities

with enough storage and drying capacity to accept and process the

insured crop within a reasonable amount of time after harvest. If

the seed company is the insured, it must also be a corporation.

Seed production. All seed produced by female parent plants with

a germination rate of at least 80 percent as determined by a

certified seed test.

Shelled corn. Kernels that have been removed from the cob.

Variety. The name, number or code assigned to a specific genetic

cross by the seed company or the Special Provisions for the insured

crop in the county.

2. Unit Division.

For any processor contract that stipulates the amount of

production to be delivered:

(a) In lieu of the definition of ``basic unit'' contained in the

Basic Provisions, a basic unit will consist of all acreage planted

to the insured crop in the county that will be used to fulfill a

hybrid seed corn processor contract;

[[Page 65351]]

(b) There will be no more than one basic unit for all production

contracted with each processor contract;

(c) In accordance with section 12, all production from any basic

unit in excess of the amount under contract will be included as

production to count if such production is applied to any other basic

unit for which the contracted amount has not been fulfilled; and

(d) Optional units will not be established.

3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for

Determining Indemnities.

(a) In addition to the requirements of section 3 of the Basic

Provisions, you may select only one price election for all the

hybrid seed corn in the county insured under this policy unless the

Special Provisions provide different price elections by variety, in

which case you may select one price election for each hybrid seed

corn variety designated in the Special Provisions. The price

election you choose for each variety must have the same percentage

relationship to the maximum price offered by us for each variety.

For example, if you choose 100 percent of the maximum price election

for one specific variety, you must also choose 100 percent of the

maximum price election for all other varieties.

(b) The production reporting requirements contained in section 3

of the Basic Provisions are not applicable to this contract.

4. Contract Changes.

In accordance with section 4 of the Basic Provisions, the

contract change date is November 30 preceding the cancellation date.

5. Cancellation and Termination Dates.

In accordance with section 2 of the Basic Provisions, the

cancellation and termination dates are March 15.

6. Report of Acreage.

In addition to the requirements of section 6 of the Basic

Provisions, you must:

(a) Report by type and variety, the location and insurable

acreage of the insured crop;

(b) Report any acreage that is uninsured, including that portion

of the total acreage occupied by male parent plants; and

(c) Certify that you have a hybrid seed corn processor contract

and report the amount, if any, of any minimum guaranteed payment.

7. Insured Crop.

(a) In accordance with section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the

crop insured will be all the female parent plants in the county for

which a premium rate is provided by the actuarial documents:

(1) In which you have a share;

(2) That are grown under a hybrid seed corn processor contract

executed before the acreage reporting date;

(3) That are planted for harvest as commercial hybrid seed corn

in accordance with the requirements of the hybrid seed corn

processor contract and the production management practices of the

seed company; and

(4) That are not (unless allowed by the Special Provisions or by

written agreement):

(i) Planted with a mixture of female and male parent seed in the

same row;

(ii) Planted for any purpose other than for commercial hybrid

seed corn;

(iii) Interplanted with another crop; or

(iv) Planted into an established grass or legume.

(b) An instrument in the form of a ``lease'' under which you

retain control of the acreage on which the insured crop is grown and

that provides for delivery of the crop under substantially the same

terms as a hybrid seed corn processor contract will be treated as a

contract under which you have an insurable interest in the crop.

(c) A commercial hybrid seed corn producer who is also a seed

company may be able to insure the hybrid seed corn crop if the

following requirements are met:

(1) The seed company has an insurable interest in the hybrid

seed corn crop;

(2) Prior to the sales closing date, the Board of Directors of

the seed company has executed and adopted a corporate resolution

that contains the same terms as a hybrid seed corn processor

contract. This corporate resolution will be considered a contract

under this policy;

(3) Sales records for at least the previous years' seed

production must be provided to confirm that the seed company has

produced and sold seed. If such records are not available, the crop

may be insured under the Coarse Grains Crop Provisions with a

written agreement; and

(4) Our inspection reveals that the storage and drying

facilities satisfy the definition of a seed company.

(d) Any of the insured crop that is under contract with

different seed companies may be insured under separate policies with

different insurance providers provided all acreage of the insured

crop in the county is insured. If you elect to insure the insured

crop with different insurance providers, you agree to pay separate

administrative fees for each insurance policy.

8. Insurable Acreage.

In addition to the provisions of section 9 of the Basic

Provisions, we will not insure any acreage of the insured crop:

(a) Planted and occupied exclusively by male parent plants;

(b) Not in compliance with the rotation requirements contained

in the Special Provisions or, if applicable, required by the hybrid

seed corn processor contract; or

(c) If either the female or male parent plants are damaged

before the final planting date and we determine that the insured

crop is practical to replant but it is not replanted.

9. Insurance Period.

(a) In addition to the provisions of section 11 of the Basic

Provisions, insurance attaches upon completion of planting of:

(1) The female parent plant seed on or before the final planting

date designated in the Special Provisions, except as allowed in

section 16 of the Basic Provisions; and

(2) The male parent plant seed.

(b) In accordance with the provisions of section 11 of the Basic

Provisions, the calendar date for the end of the insurance period is

the October 31 immediately following planting.

10. Causes of Loss.

(a) In accordance with the provisions of section 12 of the Basic

Provisions, insurance is provided only against the following causes

of loss that occur within the insurance period:

(1) Adverse weather conditions;

(2) Fire;

(3) Insects, but not damage due to insufficient or improper

application of pest control measures;

(4) Plant disease, but not damage due to insufficient or

improper application of disease control measures;

(5) Wildlife;

(6) Earthquake;

(7) Volcanic eruption; or

(8) Failure of the irrigation water supply, if due to a cause of

loss contained in section 10(a) (1) through (7) that occurs during

the insurance period.

(b) In addition to the causes of loss excluded by section 12 of

the Basic Provisions, we will not insure against any loss of

production due to:

(1) The use of unadapted, incompatible, or genetically deficient

male or female parent plant seed;

(2) Frost or freeze after the date established by the Special

Provisions;

(3) Failure to follow the requirements stated in the hybrid seed

corn processor contract and production management practices of the

seed company;

(4) Inadequate germination, even if resulting from an insured

cause of loss, unless you have provided adequate notice as required

by section 11(b)(1); or

(5) Failure to plant the male parent plant seed at a time or in

a manner sufficient to assure adequate pollination of the female

parent plants, unless you are prevented from planting the male

parent plant seed by an insured cause of loss.

11. Duties In The Event of Damage or Loss.

(a) In accordance with the requirements of section 14 of the

Basic Provisions, you must leave representative samples of at least

one complete planting pattern of the female and male parent plant

rows and extend the entire length of each field in the unit. If you

are going to destroy any acreage of the insured crop that will not

be harvested, the samples must not be destroyed until after our

inspection.

(b) In addition to the requirements of section 14 of the Basic

Provisions:

(1) You must give us notice of probable loss at least 15 days

before the beginning of harvest if you anticipate inadequate

germination on any unit; and

(2) You must provide a completed copy of your hybrid seed corn

processor contract unless we have determined it has already been

provided by the seed company, and the seed company certifies that

such contract is used for all its growers without any waivers or

amendments.

12. Settlement of Claim.

(a) We will determine your loss on a unit basis. In the event

you are unable to provide separate acceptable production records:

(1) For any optional units, we will combine all optional units

for which such production records were not provided; or

(2) For any basic units, we will allocate any commingled

production to such units in proportion to our liability on the

harvested acreage for the units.

(b) You will not receive an indemnity payment on a unit if the

seed company refuses to provide us with records we require to

determine the dollar value per bushel of production for each

variety.

[[Page 65352]]

(c) In the event of loss or damage covered by this policy, we

will settle your claim on any unit by:

(1) Multiplying the insured acreage by its respective amount of

insurance per acre, by type and variety if applicable;

(2) Totaling the results of section 12(c)(1) if there are more

than one type or variety;

(3) Multiplying the total seed production to count (see section

12(d)) for each type and variety of commercial hybrid seed corn by

the applicable dollar value per bushel for that type or variety;

(4) Multiplying the total non-seed production to count (see

section 12(e)) for each type and variety by the applicable local

market price determined on the earlier of the date the non-seed

production is sold or the date of final inspection;

(5) Totaling the results of sections 12(c)(3) and 12(c)(4) by

type and variety;

(6) Subtracting the result of section 12(c)(5) from the result

of section 12(c)(1) if there is only one type or variety, or

subtracting the result of 1or variety; and

(7) Multiplying the result of section 12(c)(6) by your share.

For example:

You have a 100 percent share in 50 acres insured for the

development of variety ``A'' hybrid seed corn in the unit, with an

amount of insurance per acre guarantee of $340 (county yield of 160

bushels times a coverage level factor of .867 for the 65 percent

coverage level, times a price election of $2.45 per bushel, minus

the minimum guaranteed payment of zero). Your seed production was

1,400 bushels and the dollar value per bushel was $9.80. Your non-

seed production was 100 bushels with a local market value of $2.00

per bushel. Your indemnity would be calculated as follows:

(1) 50 acres x $340=$17,000 amount of insurance guarantee;

(3) 1,400 bushels x $9.80=$13,720 value of seed production;

(4) 100 bushel of non-seed x $2.00=$200 of non-seed production;

(5) $13,720+$200=$13,920;

(6) $17,000-$13,920=$3,080; and

(7) $3,080 x 100 percent share=$3,080 indemnity payment.

You also have a 100 percent share in 50 acres insured for the

development of variety ``B'' hybrid seed corn in the unit, with an

amount of insurance per acre guarantee of $297 (county yield of 140

bushels times a coverage level factor of .867 for the 65 percent

coverage level, times a price election of $2.45 per bushel, minus

the minimum guaranteed payment of zero). You harvested 1,200 bushels

and the dollar value per bushel for the harvested amount was $8.56.

You also harvested 200 bushels of non-seed with a market value of

$2.00 per bushel. Your indemnity would be calculated as follows:

(1) 50 acres x $340=$17,000 amount of insurance guarantee for

type ``A'' and 50 acres x $297=$14,850 amount of insurance guarantee

for type ``B'';

(2) $17,000+$14,850=$31,850 amount of insurance guarantee;

(3) 1,400 bushels x $9.80=$13,720 value of seed production for

type ``A'' and 1,200 bushels x $8.56=$10,272 value of seed

production for type ``B'';

(4) 100 bushels of non-seed x $2.00=$200 of non-seed production

for type ``A'' and 200 bushels of non-seed x $2.00=$400 of non-seed

production for type ``B'';

(5) $13,720+$200+$10,272+$400=$24,592 value of production to

count;

(6) $31,850-$24,592=$7,258; and

(7) $7,258 x 100 percent share=$7,258 indemnity payment.

(d) Production to be counted as seed production will include:

(1) All appraised production as follows:

(i) Not less than the amount of insurance per acre for acreage:

(A) That is abandoned;

(B) Put to another use without our consent;

(C) That is damaged solely by uninsured causes; or

(D) For which you fail to provide acceptable production records;

(ii) Production lost due to uninsured causes;

(iii) Mature unharvested production with a germination rate of

at least 80 percent of the commercial hybrid seed corn as determined

by a certified seed test. Any such production may be adjusted in

accordance with section 12(f);

(iv) Immature appraised production;

(v) Potential production on insured acreage that you intend to

put to another use or abandon, if you and we agree on the appraised

amount of production. Upon such agreement, the insurance period for

that acreage will end when you put the acreage to another use or

abandon the crop. If agreement on the appraised amount of production

is not reached:

(A) If you do not elect to continue to care for the crop, we may

give you consent to put the acreage to another use if you agree to

leave intact, and provide sufficient care for, representative

samples of the crop in locations acceptable to us (The amount of

production to count for such acreage will be based on the harvested

production or appraisals from the samples at the time harvest should

have occurred. If you do not leave the required samples intact, or

fail to provide sufficient care for the samples, our appraisal made

prior to giving you consent to put the acreage to another use will

be used to determine the amount of production to count); or

(B) If you elect to continue to care for the crop, the amount of

production to count for the acreage will be the harvested

production, or our reappraisal if additional damage occurs and the

crop is not harvested; and

(2) Harvested production that you deliver as commercial hybrid

seed corn to the seed company stated in your hybrid seed corn

processor contract, regardless of quality, unless the production has

inadequate germination.

(e) Production to be counted as non-seed production will include

all harvested or mature appraised production that does not qualify

as seed production to count as specified in section 12(d). Any such

production may be adjusted in accordance with section 12(f).

(f) For the purpose of determining the quantity of mature

production:

(1) Shelled commercial hybrid seed corn will be:

(i) Increased 0.12 percent for each 0.1 percentage point of

moisture below 15 percent; or

(ii) Decreased 0.12 percent for each 0.1 percentage point of

moisture in excess of 15 percent.

(2) The weight of ear corn required to equal one bushel of

shelled seed corn will be increased 1.5 pounds for each full

percentage point of moisture in excess of 14 percent, and any

portion of a percentage point will be disregarded. The moisture

content of ear corn will be determined from a shelled sample of the

ear corn.

(3) When records of commercial hybrid seed corn production

provided by the seed company have been adjusted to a shelled corn

basis of 15.0 percent moisture and 56 pound avoirdupois bushels,

sections 12(f)(1) and (2) above will not apply to harvested

production. In such cases, records of the seed company will be used

to determine the amount of production to count, provided that the

moisture and weight of such production are calculated on the same

basis as that used to determine the approved yield.

13. Prevented Planting.

Your prevented planting coverage will be 50 percent of your

amount of insurance for timely planted acreage. If you have limited

or additional levels of coverage as specified in 7 CFR part 400,

subpart T, and pay an additional premium, you may increase your

prevented planting coverage to a level specified in the actuarial

documents.

Signed in Washington, D.C., on December 5, 1997.

Kenneth D. Ackerman,

Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.

[FR Doc. 97-32498 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-08-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.