Illinois Regulatory Program

Federal RegisterNov 26, 1997

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 913

[SPATS No. IL-098-FOR]

Illinois Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),

Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public

hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSM is announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the

Illinois regulatory program (hereinafter the ``Illinois program'')

under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA).

The proposed amendment consists of a revision to the Illinois

regulations pertaining to administrative review. The amendment is

intended to revise the Illinois program to be consistent with the

corresponding Federal regulations.

This document sets forth the times and locations that the Illinois

program and proposed amendment to that program are available for public

inspection, the comment period during which interested persons may

submit written comments on the proposed amendment, and the procedures

that will be followed regarding the public hearing, if one is

requested.

DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., c.s.t., December

26, 1997. If requested, a public hearing on the proposed amendment will

be held on December 22, 1997. Requests to speak at the hearing must be

received by 4:00 p.m., c.s.t. on December 11, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests to speak at the hearing should

be mailed or hand delivered to Andrew R. Gilmore, Director,

Indianapolis Field Office, at the address listed below.

Copies of the Illinois program, the proposed amendment, a listing

of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments received in

response to this document will be available for public review at the

addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday through

Friday, excluding holidays. Each requester may receive one free copy of

the proposed amendment by contacting OSM'S Indianapolis Field Office.

Andrew R. Gilmore, Director, Indianapolis Field Office, Office of

Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Minton-Capehart Federal

Building 575 North Pennsylvania Street, Room 301, Indianapolis, IN

46204, Telephone: (317) 226-6700.

Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Mines and Minerals,

524 South Second Street, Springfield, IL 62701-1787, Telephone (217)

782-4970.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew R. Gilmore, Director,

Indianapolis Field Office, Telephone: (317) 226-6700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Illinois Program

On June 1, 1982, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally

approved the Illinois program. Background information on the Illinois

program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of

comments, and the conditions of approval can be found in the June 1,

1982, Federal Register (47 FR 23883). Subsequent actions concerning the

conditions of approval and program amendments can be found at 30 CFR

913.15, 913,16, and 913.17.

[[Page 63046]]

II. Description of the Proposed Amendment

By letter dated November 3, 1997 (Administrative Record No. IL-

5000), Illinois submitted a proposed amendment to its program pursuant

to SMCRA. Illinois submitted the proposed amendment at its own

initiative. In its submission letter, Illinois stated the amendment was

necessitated by a permit review case wherein the hearing officer found

that the Department's burden of proof standard was improper. The

hearing officer ruled that a preponderence of the evidence standard was

the appropriate standard to apply in a permit review proceeding. On a

subsequent appeal of the administrative case, the circuit court agreed

that the clearly erroneous standard was invalid, and that the

preponderance of the evidence standard was the correct standard to

apply (Citizens Organizing Project v. IDNR, 96-MR-126, Sangamon County

Circuit Court). The provision of Title 62, Illinois Administrative Code

(IAC) that Illinois proposes to amend is at 62 IAC 1847.3(g), permit

hearings. Specifically, Illinois proposes to delete the existing

language at 62 IAC 1847.3(g) and replace it with the following

language.

The standard of proof in a hearing conducted under this Section

shall be the preponderence of the evidence.

III. Public Comment Procedures

In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is

seeking comments on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the

applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 731.15. If the amendment

is deemed adequate, it will become part of the Illinois program.

Written Comments

Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues

proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the

commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated

under DATES or at locations other than the Indianapolis Field Office

will not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included

in the Administrative Record.

Public Hearing

Persons wishing to speak at the public hearing should contact the

person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m.,

c.s.t. on December 11, 1997. The location and time of the hearing will

be arranged with those persons requesting the hearing. Any disabled

individual who has need for a special accommodation to attend a public

hearing should contact the individual listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. If no one requests an opportunity to speak at the

public hearing, the hearing will not be held.

Filing of a written statement at the time of the hearing is

requested as it will greatly assist the transcriber. Submission of

written statements in advance of the hearing will allow OSM officials

to prepare adequate responses and appropriate questions.

The public hearing will continue on the specified date until all

persons scheduled to speak have been heard. Persons in the audience who

have not been scheduled to speak, and who wish to do so, will be heard

following those who have been scheduled. The hearing will end after all

persons scheduled to speak and persons present in the audience who wish

to speak have been heard.

Public Meeting

If only one person requests an opportunity to speak at a hearing, a

public meeting, rather than a public hearing, may be held. Persons

wishing to meet with OSM representatives to discuss the proposed

amendment may request a meeting by contacting the person listed under

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings will be open to the

public and, if possible, notices of meetings will be posted at the

location listed under ADDRESSES. A written summary of each meeting will

be made a part of the Administrative Record.

IV. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12866

This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and

Review).

Executive Order 12988

The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required

by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has

determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the

applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section.

However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of

State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such

program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM,

Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30

CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State

regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must

be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is

consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and

whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have

been met.

National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since

section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency

decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not

constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section

102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.

4332(2)(C)).

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain information collection requirements that

require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will

not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).

The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon

counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was

prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a

significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small

entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements

previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In

making the determination as to whether this rule would have a

significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and

assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.

Unfunded Mandates

OSM has determined and certifies pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates

Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq.) that this rule will not impose a

cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local, state, or

tribal governments or private entities.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 913

Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

Dated: November 20, 1997.

Charles E. Sandberg,

Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.

[FR Doc. 97-31095 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-05-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.