Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program

Federal RegisterFeb 6, 1997

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SUMMARY: After reviewing the regulations governing the Disability and

Rehabilitation Research Programs, administered by the Department's

National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR),

the Secretary amends these regulations. These amendments consolidate

the regulations for six programs into one CFR part. As part of the

Department's efforts to implement the President's Regulatory

Reinvention Initiative, the amendments remove unnecessary regulations,

clarify program requirements, and improve the selection criteria.

EFFECTIVE DATE: These regulations will take effect on October 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Esquith. Telephone: 202-205-8801

or by e-mail to [email protected]

Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD)

may call the TDD number at 202-205-8133. An electronic copy of this

document may be found on the Internet at the Department's home page at

http://www.ed.gov in the ``News'' section.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In January of 1995, the Department developed

its ``Principles for Regulating'' (Principles) premised on the tenet

that the Department will regulate only when absolutely necessary. The

Principles were developed to ensure that the Department regulates in

the most flexible, most equitable, and least burdensome way possible.

The President, on March 4, 1995, announced the Regulatory Reinvention

Initiative (Initiative) to reform the Federal regulatory system. The

Initiative required all Federal agencies to review their regulations

page by page. Regulators were asked to eliminate obsolete regulations,

revise regulations to reward results rather than process, and

streamline regulations to achieve agency goals in the most efficient

and least intrusive way possible. Since March of 1995, the Department

has been reviewing thoroughly all of its regulations consistent with

the Initiative and the Principles.

Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program

As a part of these efforts, the Department examined all of the

regulations governing NIDRR's existing Disability and Rehabilitation

Research Programs as authorized under Title II of the Rehabilitation

Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 760-762) (Act). After this examination, the

Secretary determined that the regulations in Parts 350 (General

Provisions), 351 (Research and Demonstration Projects), 352

(Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers), 353 (Rehabilitation

Engineering Research Centers), 355 (Knowledge Dissemination and

Utilization Programs), 357 (Field-Initiated Projects), and 360

(Research Training and Career Development Program) could be

consolidated and improved.

In addition to consolidating the regulations, the Secretary

establishes one program to govern many projects and centers, the

Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program

(Program). The Program contains three types of projects and two types

of centers. The Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Related

Projects authority encompasses the current Research and Demonstration

Projects program (Part 351) and Knowledge Dissemination and Utilization

Programs (Part 355). The Field-Initiated Projects authority is similar

to the existing Field-Initiated Projects program (Part 357), but the

scope of projects that can be funded under the new Field-Initiated

Projects authority is changed. The Advanced Rehabilitation Research

Training Project is the new name for the existing Research Training and

Career Development Program (Part 360). The Secretary continues to fund

Rehabilitation Research Training Centers and Rehabilitation Engineering

Research Centers under requirements virtually identical to the current

ones. The Secretary believes that placing all these regulations in one

CFR part makes it easier for grantees to identify common requirements

and to understand the differences among all the projects and centers.

By making structural changes, removing unnecessary regulations, and

revising regulatory language, the Secretary improves the existing

programs because he clarifies the differences among the programs and

revises the regulations to focus on obtaining the highest quality

results.

As part of its efforts to consolidate the regulations, the

Department establishes a new set of selection criteria for use in

evaluating all applications. This new approach allows the Secretary to

reduce five different sets of selection criteria to one.

On October 11, 1996, the Secretary published a notice of proposed

rulemaking (NPRM) for the Disability and Rehabilitation Research

Projects and Centers Program in the Federal Register (61 FR 53560).

Goals 2000: Educate America Act

The Goals 2000: Educate America Act (Goals 2000) focuses the

Nation's education reform efforts on the eight National Education Goals

and provides a framework for meeting them. Goals 2000 promotes new

partnerships to strengthen schools and expands ideas and obtain

information needed to achieve the goals.

These programs support the National Education Goal that calls for

all Americans to possess the knowledge and skills necessary to compete

in a global economy and exercise the rights and responsibilities of

citizenship.

Analysis of Comments and Changes

In response to the Secretary's invitation in the NPRM, one party

submitted a comment on the proposed regulations that was not

substantive. Two parties submitted comments on the proposed regulations

that were received after the deadline and were not considered for

response. Except for minor editorial and technical revisions, there are

no differences between the NPRM, and these final regulations. Technical

and other minor changes--and suggested changes the Secretary is not

legally authorized to make under the applicable statutory authority--

are not addressed.

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required

to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid

OMB control number. The valid OMB control number assigned to the

collections of information in these final regulations are displayed at

the end of the affected sections of the regulations.

Assessment of Educational Impact

In the NPRM, the Secretary requested comments on whether the

proposed regulations would require transmission of information that is

being gathered by or is available from any other agency or authority of

the United States.

Based on the response to the proposed regulations and on its own

review, the Department has determined that the regulations in this

document do not

[[Page 5713]]

require transmission of information that is being gathered by or is

available from any other agency or authority of the United States.

List of Subjects

34 CFR Part 350

Disabled, Grant programs--education, Minority groups, Research,

Vocational rehabilitation.

34 CFR Part 351

American Indians, Disabled, Grant programs--education, Medical

research, Minority groups, Research, Vocational rehabilitation.

34 CFR Part 352

American Indians, Disabled, Education of disabled, Grant programs--

education, Research, Training programs, Vocational rehabilitation.

34 CFR Part 353

American Indians, Disabled, Education of disabled, Grant programs--

education, Research, Science and technology, Training programs,

Vocational rehabilitation.

4 CFR Part 355

Disabled, Grant programs--education, Vocational rehabilitation.

34 CFR Part 357

Disabled, Education of disabled, Grant programs--education,

Research, Science and technology, Vocational rehabilitation.

34 CFR Part 360

Disabled, Education of disabled, Grant programs--education,

Research, Training programs, Vocational rehabilitation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.133, Disability

and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program)

Dated: February 3, 1997.

Judith E. Heumann,

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.

1. Under the authority of 20 U.S.C. 1221(e)-3, Title 34 of the Code

of Federal Regulations is amended by removing parts 351, 352, 353, 355,

357, and 360.

2. Part 350 is revised to read as follows:

PART 350--DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION RESEARCH PROJECTS AND

CENTERS PROGRAM

Subpart A--General

Sec.

350.1 What is the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects

and Centers Program?

350.2 What is the purpose of the Disability and Rehabilitation

Research Project and Centers Program?

350.3 Who is eligible for an award?

350.4 What regulations apply?

350.5 What definitions apply?

Subpart B--What Projects Does the Secretary Assist?

350.10 What are the general requirements for Disability and

Rehabilitation Research Projects?

350.11 What are the general requirements for a Field-Initiated

Project?

350.12 What are the general requirements for an Advanced

Rehabilitation Research Training Project?

350.13 What must a grantee do in carrying out a research activity?

350.14 What must a grantee do in carrying out a training activity?

350.15 What must a grantee do in carrying out a demonstration

activity?

350.16 What must a grantee do in carrying out a development

activity?

350.17 What must a grantee do in carrying out a utilization

activity?

350.18 What must a grantee do in carrying out a dissemination

activity?

350.19 What must a grantee do in carrying out a technical

assistance activity?

Subpart C--What Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers Does the

Secretary Assist?

350.20 What general requirements must a Rehabilitation Research and

Training Center meet?

350.21 What collaboration must a Rehabilitation Research and

Training Center engage in?

350.22 What activities must a Rehabilitation Research and Training

Center conduct?

350.23 What restriction exists on Rehabilitation Research and

Training Centers regarding indirect costs?

Subpart D--What Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers Does the

Secretary Assist?

350.30 What requirements must a Rehabilitation Engineering Research

Center meet?

350.31 What collaboration must a Rehabilitation Engineering

Research Center engage in?

350.32 What activities must a Rehabilitation Engineering Research

Center conduct?

350.33 What cooperation requirements must a Rehabilitation

Engineering Research Center meet?

350.34 Which Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers must have

an advisory committee?

350.35 What are the requirements for the composition of an advisory

committee?

Subpart E--How Does One Apply for an Award?

350.40 What is required of each applicant regarding the needs of

individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds?

350.41 What State agency review must an applicant under the

Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program

obtain?

Subpart F--How Does the Secretary Make an Award?

350.50 What is the peer review process for this Program?

350.51 What is the purpose of peer review?

350.52 What is the composition of a peer review panel?

350.53 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?

350.54 What selection criteria does the Secretary use in evaluating

an application?

350.55 What are the additional considerations for selecting Field-

Initiated Project applications for funding?

Subpart G--What Conditions Must Be Met After an Award?

350.60 How must a grantee conduct activities?

350.61 What evaluation requirements must a grantee meet?

350.62 What are the matching requirements?

350.63 What are the requirements of a grantee relative to the

Client Assistance Program?

350.64 What is the required duration of the training in an Advanced

Rehabilitation Research Training Project?

350.65 What level of participation is required of trainees in an

Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Project?

350.66 What must a grantee include in a patent application?

Authority: Section 204; 29 U.S.C. 761-762, unless otherwise

noted.

Subpart A--General

Sec. 350.1 What is the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects

and Centers Program?

The Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers

Program provides grants to establish and support--

(a) The following Disability and Rehabilitation Research and

Related Projects:

(1) Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects.

(2) Field-Initiated Projects.

(3) Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Projects; and

(b) The following Disability and Rehabilitation Research Centers:

(1) Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers.

(2) Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

[[Page 5714]]

(Authority: Section 204; 29 U.S.C. 762)

Sec. 350.2 What is the purpose of the Disability and Rehabilitation

Research Project and Centers Program?

The purpose of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Project

and Centers Program is to plan and conduct research, demonstration

projects, training, and related activities, including international

activities, to--

(a) Develop methods, procedures, and rehabilitation technology,

that maximize the full inclusion and integration into society,

employment, independent living, family support, and economic and social

self-sufficiency of individuals with disabilities, especially

individuals with the most severe disabilities; and

(b) Improve the effectiveness of services authorized under the Act.

(Authority: Section 204(a) and (b)(6); 29 U.S.C. 762(a) and (b)(6))

Sec. 350.3 Who is eligible for an award?

The following entities are eligible for an award under this

program:

(a) States.

(b) Public or private agencies, including for-profit agencies.

(c) Public or private organizations, including for-profit

organizations.

(d) Institutions of higher education.

(e) Indian tribes and tribal organizations.

(Authority: Section 204(a); 29 U.S.C. 762(a))

Sec. 350.4 What regulations apply?

The following regulations apply to the Disability and

Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program:

(a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations

(EDGAR) as follows:

(1) 34 CFR Part 74 (Administration of Grants and Agreements with

Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-profit

Organizations).

(2) 34 CFR Part 75 (Direct Grant Programs).

(3) 34 CFR Part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department

Regulations).

(4) 34 CFR Part 80 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants

and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments).

(5) 34 CFR Part 81 (General Education Provisions Act--Enforcement).

(6) 34 CFR Part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).

(7) 34 CFR Part 85 (Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension

(Nonprocurement) and Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free

Workplace (Grants)).

(8) 34 CFR Part 86 (Drug-Free Schools and Campuses).

(b) The regulations in this Part 350.

(c)(1) Subject to the additional requirement in paragraph (c)(2) of

this section, 34 CFR Part 97 (Protection of Human Subjects).

(2) If an institutional review board (IRB) reviews research that

purposefully requires inclusion of children with disabilities or

individuals with mental disabilities as research subjects, the IRB must

have at least one member who is primarily concerned with the welfare of

these research subjects.

(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 761a, 762, 42 U.S.C. 300v-1(b))

Sec. 350.5 What definitions apply?

(a) The following definitions in 34 CFR part 77 apply to this

part--

Applicant

Application

Award

Budget

Department

EDGAR

Equipment

Facilities

Grant

Grantee

Nonprofit

Private

Project

Project period

Public

Recipient

Secretary

Supplies

State

(Authority: Section 202(i)(1); 29 U.S.C. 761a(i)(1))

(b) The following definitions also apply to this part. Act means

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 701, et seq.), as amended.

(Authority: Sec. 202(i)(1); (29 U.S.C. 761a(i)(1))

Assistive technology device means any item, piece of equipment, or

product system, whether acquired commercially or off the shelf,

modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve

functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities.

(Authority: Section 7(23); 29 U.S.C. 706(23))

Assistive technology service means any service that directly

assists an individual with a disability in the selection, acquisition,

or use of an assistive technology device, including--

(1) The evaluation of the needs of an individual with a disability,

including a functional evaluation of the individual in the individual's

customary environment;

(2) Purchasing, leasing, or otherwise providing for the acquisition

of assistive technology devices by individuals with disabilities;

(3) Selecting, designing, fitting, customizing, adapting, applying,

maintaining, repairing, or replacing assistive technology devices;

(4) Coordinating and using other therapies, interventions, or

services with assistive technology devices, such as those associated

with existing education and rehabilitation plans and programs;

(5) Training or technical assistance for individuals with

disabilities, or, if appropriate, their family members, guardians,

advocates, or authorized representatives; and

(6) Training or technical assistance for professionals (including

individuals providing education and rehabilitation services),

employers, or other individuals who provide services to employ, or are

otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of,

individuals with disabilities.

(Authority: Section 7(24); 29 U.S.C. 706(24))

Disability means a physical or mental impairment that substantially

limits one or more major life activities.

(Authority: Section 202(i)(1); 29 U.S.C. 761a(i)(1))

Individual with a disability means any individual who:

(1) Has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits

one or more of the individual's major life activities;

(2) Has a record of this impairment; or

(3) Is regarded as having this impairment.

(Authority: Section 7(8)(B); 29 U.S.C. 706(8)(B))

Individual with a severe disability means--

(1)(i) An individual with a disability who has a severe physical or

mental impairment that seriously limits one or more functional

capacities (such as mobility, communication, self-care, self-direction,

interpersonal skills, work tolerance, or work skills) in terms of an

employment outcome;

(ii) Whose vocational rehabilitation can be expected to require

multiple vocational rehabilitation services over an extended period of

time; and

(iii) Who has one or more physical or mental disabilities resulting

from amputation, arthritis, autism, blindness, burn injury, cancer,

cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, deafness, head injury, heart disease,

hemiplegia, hemophilia, respiratory or pulmonary dysfunction, mental

retardation, mental illness, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy,

musculoskeletal disorders, neurological disorders (including stroke and

epilepsy), paraplegia, quadriplegia, other spinal cord impairments,

sickle cell anemia, specific learning disability, end-stage renal

disease, or another

[[Page 5715]]

disability or combination of disabilities determined on the basis of an

assessment of rehabilitation needs to cause comparable substantial

functional limitation; or

(2) An individual with a severe mental or physical impairment whose

ability to function independently in the family or community or whose

ability to obtain, maintain, or advance in employment is substantially

limited and for whom the delivery of independent living services will

improve the ability to function, continue functioning, or move towards

functioning independently in the family or community or to continue in

employment, respectively.

(Authority: Section 7(15)(C); 29 U.S.C. 706(15)(C))

Personal assistance services means a range of services, provided by

one or more persons, designed to assist an individual with a disability

to perform daily living activities, on and off the job, that the

individual would typically perform if the individual did not have a

disability. These services must be designed to increase the

individual's control in life and ability to perform everyday activities

on and off the job.

(Authority: Section 12(c); 29 U.S.C. 711(c))

Rehabilitation technology means the systematic application of

technologies, engineering methodologies, or scientific principles to

meet the needs of and address the barriers confronted by individuals

with disabilities in such areas as education, rehabilitation,

employment, transportation, independent living, and recreation, and

includes rehabilitation engineering, assistive technology devices, and

assistive technology services.

(Authority: Section 7(13); 29 U.S.C. 706(13))

Research is classified on a continuum from basic to applied:

(1) Basic research is research in which the investigator is

concerned primarily with gaining new knowledge or understanding of a

subject without reference to any immediate application or utility.

(2) Applied research is research in which the investigator is

primarily interested in developing new knowledge, information or

understanding which can be applied to a predetermined rehabilitation

problem or need. Applied research builds on selected findings from

basic research.

(Authority: Section 202(i)(1); 29 U.S.C. 761a(i)(1))

State rehabilitation agency means the sole State agency designated

to administer (or supervise local administration of) the State plan for

vocational rehabilitation services. The term includes the State agency

for the blind, if designated as the State agency with respect to that

part of the plan relating to the vocational rehabilitation of blind

individuals.

(Authority: Section 101(a)(1)(A); 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(1)(A))

Target population means the group of individuals, organizations, or

other entities expected to be affected by the project. More than one

group may be involved since a project may affect those who receive

services, provide services, or administer services.

(Authority: Section 202(i)(1); 29 U.S.C. 761a(i)(1))

Subpart B--What Projects Does the Secretary Assist?

Sec. 350.10 What are the general requirements for Disability and

Rehabilitation Research Projects?

Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects must meet the

following requirements:

(a) Carry out one or more of the following types of activities, as

specified in Secs. 350.13-350.19:

(1) Research.

(2) Development.

(3) Demonstration.

(4) Training.

(5) Dissemination.

(6) Utilization.

(7) Technical assistance.

(b) Further one or more of the purposes listed in Sec. 350.2.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Sec. 350.11 What are the general requirements for a Field-Initiated

Project?

A Field-Initiated Project must--

(a) Further one or more of the purposes in Sec. 350.2; and

(b) Carry out one of the following types of activities:

(1) Research.

(2) Development.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Sec. 350.12 What are the general requirements for an Advanced

Rehabilitation Research Training Project?

An Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Project must--

(a) Provide research training and experience at an advanced level

to individuals with doctorates or similar advanced degrees who have

clinical or other relevant experience;

(b) Further one or more of the purposes in Sec. 350.2; and

(c) Carry out all of the following activities:

(1) Recruitment and selection of candidates for advanced research

training.

(2) Provision of a training program that includes didactic and

classroom instruction, is multidisciplinary, and emphasizes scientific

methodology, and may involve collaboration among institutions.

(3) Provision of research experience, laboratory experience or its

equivalent in a community-based research setting, and a practicum that

involve each individual in clinical research and in practical

activities with organizations representing individuals with

disabilities.

(4) Provision of academic mentorship or guidance, and opportunities

for scientific collaboration with qualified researchers at the host

university and other appropriate institutions.

(5) Provision of opportunities for participation in the development

of professional presentations and publications, and for attendance at

professional conferences and meetings as appropriate for the

individual's field of study and level of experience.

(Authority: Section 202(k); 29 U.S.C. 761a(k))

Sec. 350.13 What must a grantee do in carrying out a research

activity?

In carrying out a research activity under this program, a grantee

shall--

(a) Identify one or more hypotheses; and

(b) Based on the hypotheses identified, perform an intensive

systematic study directed toward--

(1) New or full scientific knowledge; or

(2) Understanding of the subject or problem studied.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Sec. 350.14 What must a grantee do in carrying out a training

activity?

In carrying out a training activity under this program, a grantee

shall conduct a planned and systematic sequence of supervised

instruction that is designed to impart predetermined skills and

knowledge.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Sec. 350.15 What must a grantee do in carrying out a demonstration

activity?

In carrying out a demonstration activity under this program, a

grantee shall apply results derived from previous research, testing, or

practice to determine the effectiveness of a new strategy or approach.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Sec. 350.16 What must a grantee do in carrying out a development

activity?

In carrying out a development activity under this program, a

grantee must use knowledge and understanding gained from research to

create materials,

[[Page 5716]]

devices, systems, or methods beneficial to the target population,

including design and development of prototypes and processes.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Sec. 350.17 What must a grantee do in carrying out a utilization

activity?

In carrying out a utilization activity under this program, a

grantee must relate research findings to practical applications in

planning, policy making, program administration, and delivery of

services to individuals with disabilities.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Sec. 350.18 What must a grantee do in carrying out a dissemination

activity?

In carrying out a dissemination activity under this program, a

grantee must systematically distribute information or knowledge through

a variety of ways to potential users or beneficiaries.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Sec. 350.19 What must a grantee do in carrying out a technical

assistance activity?

In carrying out a technical assistance activity under this program,

a grantee must provide expertise or information for use in problem-

solving.

(Authority: Section 202; 29 U.S.C. 761a)

Subpart C--What Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers Does

the Secretary Assist?

Sec. 350.20 What general requirements must a Rehabilitation Research

and Training Center meet?

A Rehabilitation Research and Training Center shall--

(a) Plan and conduct activities that further one or more of the

purposes listed in Sec. 350.2;

(b) Serve as a center of national excellence and as a national or

regional resource for providers and individuals with disabilities and

the parents, family members, guardians, advocates, or authorized

representatives of the individuals;

(c) Be of sufficient size, scope, and quality to effectively carry

out the activities in an efficient manner consistent with appropriate

State and Federal law; and

(d) Be able to carry out training activities either directly or

through another entity that can provide such training.

(Authority: Section 204(b) and (b)(2)(K); 29 U.S.C. 762(b) and

(b)(2)(K))

Sec. 350.21 What collaboration must a Rehabilitation Research and

Training Center engage in?

A Rehabilitation Research and Training Center must be operated by

or in collaboration with--

(a) One or more institutions of higher education; or

(b) One or more providers of rehabilitation or other appropriate

services.

(Authority: Section 204(b)(2); 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(2))

Sec. 350.22 What activities must a Rehabilitation Research and

Training Center conduct?

A Rehabilitation Research and Training Center shall--

(a) Carry out research activities by conducting coordinated and

advanced programs of research in rehabilitation targeted toward the

production of new knowledge that will--

(1) Improve rehabilitation methodology and service delivery

systems;

(2) Alleviate or stabilize disabling conditions; and

(3) Promote maximum social and economic independence of individuals

with disabilities;

(b) Conduct training activities by providing training (including

graduate, pre-service, and in-service training) to assist--

(1) Rehabilitation personnel and other individuals to more

effectively provide rehabilitation services; and

(2) Rehabilitation research personnel and other rehabilitation

personnel to improve their capacity to conduct research; and

(c) Conduct technical assistance activities by serving as an

informational and technical assistance resource for providers,

individuals with disabilities, and the parents, family members,

guardians, advocates, or authorized representatives of the individuals

with disabilities, through conferences, workshops, public education

programs, in-service training programs, and similar activities.

Sec. 350.23 What restriction exists on Rehabilitation Research and

Training Centers regarding indirect costs?

A host institution with which a Rehabilitation Research and

Training Center is affiliated may not collect more than fifteen percent

of the total grant award as indirect cost charges, notwithstanding the

provisions in 34 CFR 75.562.

(Authority: Section 204(b)(2)(O); 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(2)(O))

Subpart D--What Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers Does

the Secretary Assist?

Sec. 350.30 What requirements must a Rehabilitation Engineering

Research Center meet?

A Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center shall plan and conduct

activities that--

(a) Further one or more of the purposes listed in Sec. 350.2; and

(b) (1) Lead to the development of methods, procedures, and devices

that will benefit individuals with disabilities, especially those with

the most severe disabilities; or

(2) Involve rehabilitation technology and enhance opportunities for

meeting the needs of, and addressing the barriers confronted by,

individuals with disabilities in all aspects of their lives.

(Authority: Section 204(b)(3); 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(3))

Sec. 350.31 What collaboration must a Rehabilitation Engineering

Research Center engage in?

A Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center must be operated by or

in collaboration with--

(a) One or more institutions of higher education; or

(b) One or more nonprofit organizations.

(Authority: Section 204(b)(3); 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(3))

Sec. 350.32 What activities must a Rehabilitation Engineering Research

Center conduct?

A Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center shall--

(a) Conduct research or demonstration activities by using one or

more of the following strategies:

(1) Developing and disseminating innovative methods of applying

advanced technology, scientific achievement, and psychological and

social knowledge to solve rehabilitation problems and remove

environmental barriers through--

(i) Planning and conducting research, including cooperative

research with public or private agencies and organizations, designed to

produce new scientific knowledge and new or improved methods,

equipment, or devices; and

(ii) Studying and evaluating new or emerging technologies,

products, or environments and their effectiveness and benefits.

(2) Demonstrating and disseminating--

(i) Innovative models for the delivery to rural and urban areas of

cost-effective rehabilitation technology services that

[[Page 5717]]

will promote the use of assistive technology services; and

(ii) Other scientific research to assist in meeting the employment

and independent living needs of individuals with severe disabilities.

(3) Conducting research and demonstration activities that

facilitate service delivery systems change by demonstrating,

evaluating, documenting, and disseminating--

(i) Consumer-responsive and individual and family-centered

innovative models for the delivery, to both rural and urban areas, of

innovative, cost-effective rehabilitation technology services that

promote use of rehabilitation technology; and

(ii) Other scientific research to assist in meeting the employment

and independent living needs of, and addressing the barriers confronted

by individuals with disabilities, including individuals with severe

disabilities;

(b) To the extent consistent with the nature and type of research

or demonstration activities described in paragraph (a) of this section,

carry out research, training, and information dissemination activities

by--

(1) Providing training opportunities to individuals, including

individuals with disabilities, to enable them to become rehabilitation

technology researchers and practitioners of rehabilitation technology

in conjunction with institutions of higher education and nonprofit

organizations; and

(2) Responding, through research or demonstration activities, to

the needs of individuals with all types of disabilities who may benefit

from the application of technology within the subject area of focus of

the Center.

(c) Conduct orientation seminars for rehabilitation service

personnel to improve the application of rehabilitation technology;

(d) Conduct activities that specifically demonstrate means for

utilizing rehabilitation technology; and

(e) Provide technical assistance and consultation that are

responsive to concerns of service providers and consumers.

(Authority: Section 204(b)(3); 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(3))

Sec. 350.33 What cooperation requirements must a Rehabilitation

Engineering Research Center meet?

A Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center--

(a) Shall cooperate with State agencies and other local, State,

regional, and national programs and organizations developing or

delivering rehabilitation technology, including State programs funded

under the Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals With

Disabilities Act of 1988 (29 U.S.C. 2201 et seq.); and

(b) To the extent consistent with the nature and type of research

or demonstration activities described in Sec. 350.32(a), shall

cooperate with the entities described in paragraph (a) of this section

to provide information to individuals with disabilities and their

parents, family members, guardians, advocates, or authorized

representatives, to--

(1) Increase awareness and understanding of how rehabilitation

technology can address their needs; and

(2) Increase awareness and understanding of the range of options,

programs, services, and resources available, including financing

options for the technology and services covered by the subject area of

focus of the Center.

(Authority: Section 204(b)(3) and (c); 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(3) and (c))

Sec. 350.34 Which Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers must

have an advisory committee?

A Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center conducting research or

demonstration activities that facilitate service delivery systems

change must have an advisory committee.

(Authority: Section 204 (b)(3)(D); 29 U.S.C. 762 (b)(3)(D))

Sec. 350.35 What are the requirements for the composition of an

advisory committee?

The majority of a Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center

advisory committee's members must be comprised of individuals with

disabilities who are users of rehabilitation technology, or their

parents, family members, guardians, advocates, or authorized

representatives.

(Authority: Section 204(b)(3)(D); 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(3)(D))

Subpart E--How Does One Apply for an Award?

Sec. 350.40 What is required of each applicant regarding the needs of

individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds?

(a) Unless the Secretary indicates otherwise in a notice published

in the Federal Register, an applicant for assistance under this program

must demonstrate in its application how it will address, in whole or in

part, the needs of individuals with disabilities from minority

backgrounds.

(b) The approaches an applicant may take to meet this requirement

may include one or more of the following:

(1) Proposing project objectives addressing the needs of

individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds.

(2) Demonstrating that the project will address a problem that is

of particular significance to individuals with disabilities from

minority backgrounds.

(3) Demonstrating that individuals from minority backgrounds will

be included in study samples in sufficient numbers to generate

information pertinent to individuals with disabilities from minority

backgrounds.

(4) Drawing study samples and program participant rosters from

populations or areas that include individuals from minority

backgrounds.

(5) Providing outreach to individuals with disabilities from

minority backgrounds to ensure that they are aware of rehabilitation

services, clinical care, or training offered by the project.

(6) Disseminating materials to or otherwise increasing the access

to disability information among minority populations.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control

number 1820-0027)

(Authority: Sections 21(b)(6); 29 U.S.C. 718b(b)(6))

Sec. 350.41 What State agency review must an applicant under the

Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program

obtain?

(a) An applicant that proposes to conduct research, demonstrations,

or related activities that will either involve clients of the State

vocational rehabilitation agency as research subjects or study

vocational rehabilitation services or techniques under this program,

shall follow the requirements in 34 CFR 75.155 through 75.159.

(b) For the purposes of this Program, ``State'' as used in 34 CFR

75.155 through 75.159 means the State rehabilitation agency or agencies

in the primary State or States to be affected by the proposed

activities.

(Authority: Sections 204(c) and 306(i); 29 U.S.C. 762(c) and 766(a))

Subpart F--How Does the Secretary Make an Award?

Sec. 350.50 What is the peer review process for this Program?

(a) The Secretary refers each application for a grant governed by

those regulations in this part to a peer review panel established by

the Secretary.

(b) Peer review panels review applications on the basis of the

applicable selection criteria in Sec. 350.54.

(Authority: Section 202(e); 29 U.S.C. 761a(e))

[[Page 5718]]

Sec. 350.51 What is the purpose of peer review?

The purpose of peer review is to insure that--

(a) Those activities supported by the National Institute on

Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) are of the highest

scientific, administrative, and technical quality; and

(b) Activity results may be widely applied to appropriate target

populations and rehabilitation problems.

(Authority: Section 202(e); 29 U.S.C. 761a(e))

Sec. 350.52 What is the composition of a peer review panel?

(a) The Secretary selects as members of a peer review panel

scientists and other experts in rehabilitation or related fields who

are qualified, on the basis of training, knowledge, or experience, to

give expert advice on the merit of the applications under review.

(b) Applications for awards of $60,000 or more, except those for

the purposes of evaluation, dissemination of information, or

conferences, must be reviewed by a peer review panel that consists of a

majority of non-Federal members.

(c) In selecting members to serve on a peer review panel, the

Secretary takes into account all of the following factors:

(1) The level of formal scientific or technical education completed

by potential panel members.

(2)(i) The extent to which potential panel members have engaged in

scientific, technical, or administrative activities appropriate to the

category of applications that the panel will consider;

(ii) The roles of potential panel members in those activities; and

(iii) The quality of those activities.

(3) The recognition received by potential panel members as

reflected by awards and other honors from scientific and professional

agencies and organizations outside the Department.

(4) Whether the panel includes knowledgeable individuals with

disabilities, or parents, family members, guardians, advocates, or

authorized representatives of individuals with disabilities.

(5) Whether the panel includes individuals from diverse

populations.

(Authority: Sections 18 and 202(e); 29 U.S.C. 717 and 761a(e))

Sec. 350.53 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?

(a)(1)(i) The Secretary selects one or more of the selection

criteria in Sec. 350.54 to evaluate an application;

(ii) The Secretary establishes selection criteria based on

statutory provisions that apply to the Program which may include, but

are not limited to--

(A) Specific statutory selection criteria;

(B) Allowable activities;

(C) Application content requirements; or

(D) Other pre-award and post-award conditions; or

(iii) The Secretary uses a combination of selection criteria

established under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section and selection

criteria in Sec. 350.54.

(2) For Field-Initiated Projects, the Secretary does not consider

Sec. 350.54(b) (Responsiveness to the Absolute or Competitive Priority)

in evaluating an application.

(b)(1) In considering selection criteria in Sec. 350.54, the

Secretary selects one or more of the factors listed in the criteria

except as provided for in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.

(2) Under Sec. 350.54, the Secretary always considers the factor in

paragraph (n)(2) of that section.

(c) The maximum possible score for an application is 100 points.

(d)(1) In the application package or a notice published in the

Federal Register, the Secretary informs applicants of--

(i)(A) The selection criteria chosen; and

(B) The maximum possible score for each of the selection criteria;

and

(ii)(A) The factors selected for considering the selection

criteria; and

(B) If points are assigned to each factor, the maximum possible

score for each factor under each criterion.

(2) If no points are assigned to each factor, the Secretary

evaluates each factor equally.

(e) For Field-Initiated Projects, in addition to the selection

criteria, the Secretary uses the additional considerations in selecting

applications for funding as described in Sec. 350.55.

(Authority: Section 202(e); 29 U.S.C. 761a(e))

Sec. 350.54 What selection criteria does the Secretary use in

evaluating an application?

In addition to criteria established under Sec. 350.53(a)(1)(ii),

the Secretary may select one or more of the following criteria in

evaluating an application:

(a) Importance of the problem. (1) The Secretary considers the

importance of the problem.

(2) In determining the importance of the problem, the Secretary

considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the applicant clearly describes the need

and target population.

(ii) The extent to which the proposed activities further the

purposes of the Act.

(iii) The extent to which the proposed activities address a

significant need of one or more disabled populations.

(iv) The extent to which the proposed activities address a

significant need of rehabilitation service providers.

(v) The extent to which the proposed activities address a

significant need of those who provide services to individuals with

disabilities.

(vi) The extent to which the applicant proposes to provide training

in a rehabilitation discipline or area of study in which there is a

shortage of qualified researchers, or to a trainee population in which

there is a need for more qualified researchers.

(vii) The extent to which the proposed project will have beneficial

impact on the target population.

(b) Responsiveness to an absolute or competitive priority. (1) The

Secretary considers the responsiveness of the application to an

absolute or competitive priority published in the Federal Register.

(2) In determining the application's responsiveness to the absolute

or competitive priority, the Secretary considers one or more of the

following factors:

(i) The extent to which the applicant addresses all requirements of

the absolute or competitive priority.

(ii) The extent to which the applicant's proposed activities are

likely to achieve the purposes of the absolute or competitive priority.

(c) Design of research activities. (1) The Secretary considers the

extent to which the design of research activities is likely to be

effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project.

(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be

effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary

considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the research activities constitute a

coherent, sustained approach to research in the field, including a

substantial addition to the state-of-the-art.

(ii) The extent to which the methodology of each proposed research

activity is meritorious, including consideration of the extent to

which--

(A) The proposed design includes a comprehensive and informed

review of the current literature, demonstrating knowledge of the state-

of-the-art;

(B) Each research hypothesis is theoretically sound and based on

current knowledge;

(C) Each sample population is appropriate and of sufficient size;

(D) The data collection and measurement techniques are appropriate

and likely to be effective; and

[[Page 5719]]

(E) The data analysis methods are appropriate.

(iii) The extent to which anticipated research results are likely

to satisfy the original hypotheses and could be used for planning

additional research, including generation of new hypotheses where

applicable.

(d) Design of development activities. (1) The Secretary considers

the extent to which the design of development activities is likely to

be effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project.

(2) (i) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to

be effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the

Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:

(ii) The extent to which the plan for development, clinical

testing, and evaluation of new devices and technology is likely to

yield significant products or techniques, including consideration of

the extent to which--

(A) The proposed project will use the most effective and

appropriate technology available in developing the new device or

technique;

(B) The proposed development is based on a sound conceptual model

that demonstrates an awareness of the state-of-the-art in technology;

(C) The new device or technique will be developed and tested in an

appropriate environment;

(D) The new device or technique is likely to be cost-effective and

useful;

(E) The new device or technique has the potential for commercial or

private manufacture, marketing, and distribution of the product; and

(F) The proposed development efforts include adequate quality

controls and, as appropriate, repeated testing of products.

(e) Design of demonstration activities. (1) The Secretary considers

the extent to which the design of demonstration activities is likely to

be effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project.

(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be

effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary

considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities build

on previous research, testing, or practices.

(ii) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities

include the use of proper methodological tools and theoretically sound

procedures to determine the effectiveness of the strategy or approach.

(iii) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities

include innovative and effective strategies or approaches.

(iv) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities are

likely to contribute to current knowledge and practice and be a

substantial addition to the state-of-the-art.

(v) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities can

be applied and replicated in other settings.

(f) Design of training activities. (1) The Secretary considers the

extent to which the design of training activities is likely to be

effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project.

(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be

effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary

considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the proposed training materials are likely

to be effective, including consideration of their quality, clarity, and

variety.

(ii) The extent to which the proposed training methods are of

sufficient quality, intensity, and duration.

(iii) The extent to which the proposed training content--

(A) Covers all of the relevant aspects of the subject matter; and

(B) If relevant, is based on new knowledge derived from research

activities of the proposed project.

(iv) The extent to which the proposed training materials, methods,

and content are appropriate to the trainees, including consideration of

the skill level of the trainees and the subject matter of the

materials.

(v) The extent to which the proposed training materials and methods

are accessible to individuals with disabilities.

(vi) The extent to which the applicant's proposed recruitment

program is likely to be effective in recruiting highly qualified

trainees, including those who are individuals with disabilities.

(vii) The extent to which the applicant is able to carry out the

training activities, either directly or through another entity.

(viii) The extent to which the proposed didactic and classroom

training programs emphasize scientific methodology and are likely to

develop highly qualified researchers.

(ix) The extent to which the quality and extent of the academic

mentorship, guidance, and supervision to be provided to each individual

trainee are of a high level and are likely to develop highly qualified

researchers.

(x) The extent to which the type, extent, and quality of the

proposed clinical and laboratory research experience, including the

opportunity to participate in advanced-level research, are likely to

develop highly qualified researchers.

(xi) The extent to which the opportunities for collegial and

collaborative activities, exposure to outstanding scientists in the

field, and opportunities to participate in the preparation of scholarly

or scientific publications and presentations are extensive and

appropriate.

(g) Design of dissemination activities. (1) The Secretary considers

the extent to which the design of dissemination activities is likely to

be effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project.

(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be

effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary

considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the content of the information to be

disseminated--

(A) Covers all of the relevant aspects of the subject matter; and

(B) If appropriate, is based on new knowledge derived from research

activities of the project.

(ii) The extent to which the materials to be disseminated are

likely to be effective and usable, including consideration of their

quality, clarity, variety, and format.

(iii) The extent to which the methods for dissemination are of

sufficient quality, intensity, and duration.

(iv) The extent to which the materials and information to be

disseminated and the methods for dissemination are appropriate to the

target population, including consideration of the familiarity of the

target population with the subject matter, format of the information,

and subject matter.

(v) The extent to which the information to be disseminated will be

accessible to individuals with disabilities.

(h) Design of utilization activities. (1) The Secretary considers

the extent to which the design of utilization activities is likely to

be effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project.

(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be

effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary

considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the potential new users of the information

or technology have a practical use for the information and are likely

to adopt the practices or use the information or technology, including

new devices.

(ii) The extent to which the utilization strategies are likely to

be effective.

[[Page 5720]]

(iii) The extent to which the information or technology is likely

to be of use in other settings.

(i) Design of technical assistance activities. (1) The Secretary

considers the extent to which the design of technical assistance

activities is likely to be effective in accomplishing the objectives of

the project.

(2) In determining the extent to which the design is likely to be

effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Secretary

considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the methods for providing technical

assistance are of sufficient quality, intensity, and duration.

(ii) The extent to which the information to be provided through

technical assistance covers all of the relevant aspects of the subject

matter.

(iii) The extent to which the technical assistance is appropriate

to the target population, including consideration of the knowledge

level of the target population, needs of the target population, and

format for providing information.

(iv) The extent to which the technical assistance is accessible to

individuals with disabilities.

(j) Plan of operation. (1) The Secretary considers the quality of

the plan of operation.

(2) In determining the quality of the plan of operation, the

Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The adequacy of the plan of operation to achieve the objectives

of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly

defined responsibilities, and timelines for accomplishing project

tasks.

(ii) The adequacy of the plan of operation to provide for using

resources, equipment, and personnel to achieve each objective.

(k) Collaboration. (1) The Secretary considers the quality of

collaboration.

(2) In determining the quality of collaboration, the Secretary

considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the applicant's proposed collaboration with

one or more agencies, organizations, or institutions is likely to be

effective in achieving the relevant proposed activities of the project.

(ii) The extent to which agencies, organizations, or institutions

demonstrate a commitment to collaborate with the applicant.

(iii) The extent to which agencies, organizations, or institutions

that commit to collaborate with the applicant have the capacity to

carry out collaborative activities.

(l) Adequacy and reasonableness of the budget. (1) The Secretary

considers the adequacy and the reasonableness of the proposed budget.

(2) In determining the adequacy and the reasonableness of the

proposed budget, the Secretary considers one or more of the following

factors:

(i) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the

proposed project activities.

(ii) The extent to which the budget for the project, including any

subcontracts, is adequately justified to support the proposed project

activities.

(iii) The extent to which the applicant is of sufficient size,

scope, and quality to effectively carry out the activities in an

efficient manner.

(m) Plan of evaluation. (1) The Secretary considers the quality of

the plan of evaluation.

(2) In determining the quality of the plan of evaluation, the

Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the plan of evaluation provides for

periodic assessment of progress toward--

(A) Implementing the plan of operation; and

(B) Achieving the project's intended outcomes and expected impacts.

(ii) The extent to which the plan of evaluation will be used to

improve the performance of the project through the feedback generated

by its periodic assessments.

(iii) The extent to which the plan of evaluation provides for

periodic assessment of a project's progress that is based on identified

performance measures that--

(A) Are clearly related to the intended outcomes of the project and

expected impacts on the target population; and

(B) Are objective, and quantifiable or qualitative, as appropriate.

(n) Project staff. (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the

project staff.

(2) In determining the quality of the project staff, the Secretary

considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for

employment from persons who are members of groups that have

traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national

origin, gender, age, or disability.

(3) In addition, the Secretary considers one or more of the

following:

(i) The extent to which the key personnel and other key staff have

appropriate training and experience in disciplines required to conduct

all proposed activities.

(ii) The extent to which the commitment of staff time is adequate

to accomplish all the proposed activities of the project.

(iii) The extent to which the key personnel are knowledgeable about

the methodology and literature of pertinent subject areas.

(iv) The extent to which the project staff includes outstanding

scientists in the field.

(v) The extent to which key personnel have up-to-date knowledge

from research or effective practice in the subject area covered in the

priority.

(o) Adequacy and accessibility of resources. (1) The Secretary

considers the adequacy and accessibility of the applicant's resources

to implement the proposed project.

(2) In determining the adequacy and accessibility of resources, the

Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the applicant is committed to provide

adequate facilities, equipment, other resources, including

administrative support, and laboratories, if appropriate.

(ii) The quality of an applicant's past performance in carrying out

a grant.

(iii) The extent to which the applicant has appropriate access to

clinical populations and organizations representing individuals with

disabilities to support advanced clinical rehabilitation research.

(iv) The extent to which the facilities, equipment, and other

resources are appropriately accessible to individuals with disabilities

who may use the facilities, equipment, and other resources of the

project.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control

number 1820-0027)

(Authority: Sections 202 and 204; 29 U.S.C. 761a and 762)

Sec. 350.55 What are the additional considerations for selecting

Field-Initiated Project applications for funding?

(a) The Secretary reserves funds to support some or all of the

Field-Initiated Project applications that have been awarded points

totaling 80% or more of the maximum possible points under the

procedures described in Sec. 350.53.

(b) In making a final selection of applications to support as

Field-Initiated Projects, the Secretary considers the extent to which

applications that have been awarded a rating of 80% or more of the

maximum possible points and meet one or more of the following

conditions:

(1) The proposed project represents a unique opportunity to advance

rehabilitation knowledge to improve the lives of individuals with

disabilities.

(2) The proposed project complements research already planned or

funded by the NIDRR through annual priorities published in the Federal

[[Page 5721]]

Register or addresses the research in a new and promising way.

(Authority: Sections 202 (g) and (i)(1); 29 U.S.C. 761a(g) and

761a(i)(1))

Subpart G--What Conditions Must Be Met After an Award?

Sec. 350.60 How must a grantee conduct activities?

A grantee must--

(a) Conduct all activities in a manner that is accessible to and

usable by individuals with disabilities; and

(b) If a grantee carries out more than one activity, carry out

integrated activities.

(Authority: Sections 202 and 204(b)(2); 29 U.S.C. 761a and 762(b))

Sec. 350.61 What evaluation requirements must a grantee meet?

(a) A grantee must establish performance measures for use in its

evaluation that--

(1) Are clearly related to the--

(i) Intended outcomes of the project; and

(ii) Expected impacts on the target population; and

(2) To the extent possible are quantifiable, or are objective and

qualitative.

(b) A grantee must make periodic assessments of progress that will

provide the grantee with performance feedback related to--

(1) Progress in implementing the plan of operation; and

(2) Progress in achieving the intended outcomes and expected

impacts as assessed by the established performance measures.

(Authority: Sections 202 and 204; 29 U.S.C. 761a and 762)

Sec. 350.62 What are the matching requirements?

(a) (1) The Secretary may make grants to pay for part of the costs

of research and demonstration projects that bear directly on the

development of procedures, methods, and devices to assist the provision

of vocational and other rehabilitation services, and research training

and career development projects.

(2) Each grantee must participate in the costs of those projects.

(3) The specific amount of cost sharing to be borne by each

grantee--

(i) Is negotiated at the time of the award; and

(ii) Is not considered in the selection process.

(b) (1) The Secretary may make grants to pay for part or all of the

costs of--

(i) Establishment and support of Rehabilitation Research and

Training Centers and Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers; and

(ii) Specialized research or demonstration activities described in

Section 204(b) (2)-(16) of the Act.

(2) The Secretary determines at the time of the award whether the

grantee must pay a portion of the project or center costs.

(Authority: Section 204; 29 U.S.C. 762)

Sec. 350.63 What are the requirements of a grantee relative to the

Client Assistance Program?

All Projects and Centers that provide services to individuals with

disabilities with funds awarded under this Program must--

(a) Advise those individuals who are applicants for or recipients

of services under the Act, or their parents, family members, guardians,

advocates, or authorized representatives, of the availability and

purposes of the Client Assistance Program (CAP) funded under the Act;

and

(b) Provide information on the means of seeking assistance under

the CAP.

(Authority: Section 20; 29 U.S.C. 718a)

Sec. 350.64 What is the required duration of the training in an

Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Project?

A grantee for an Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Project

shall provide training to individuals that is at least one academic

year, unless a longer training period is necessary to ensure that each

trainee is qualified to conduct independent research upon completion of

the course of training.

(Authority: Sections 202-204; 29 U.S.C. 760-762)

Sec. 350.65 What level of participation is required of trainees in an

Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Project?

Individuals who are receiving training under an Advanced

Rehabilitation Research Training Project shall devote at least eighty

percent of their time to the activities of the training program during

the training period.

(Authority: Sections 202-204; 29 U.S.C. 760-762)

Sec. 350.66 What must a grantee include in a patent application?

Any patent application filed by a grantee for an invention made

under a grant must include the following statement in the first

paragraph:

The invention described in this application was made under a

grant from the Department of Education.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3)

[FR Doc. 97-3003 Filed 2-5-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.