The Administrative Co.; Michael P. McIntyre; Analysis to Aid Public Comment
Federal RegisterFeb 5, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 932-3019]
The Administrative Co.; Michael P. McIntyre; Analysis to Aid
Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of
competition, this consent agreement, accepted subject to final
Commission approval, would prohibit, among other things, The
Administrative Company and McIntyre from making misrepresentations
about living trusts, and would require them to make certain disclosures
with regard to legal challenges that can be made against living trusts,
the possibility of probate for certain estates regardless of whether
living trusts are used, and the transfer of consumers' assets into the
trusts. The agreement settles allegations that the respondents made
numerous false statements about the benefits and appropriateness of
living trusts, in general, and about living trusts they sold, in
particular.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 7, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary,
Room 159, 6th St. and Pa. Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Charter, Federal Trade
Commission, Denver Regional Office, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1523,
Denver, CO 80294. (303) 844-2272. Elizabeth Palmquist, Federal Trade
Commission, Denver Regional Office, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1523,
Denver, CO 80294. (303) 844-2272.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46, and Sec. 2.34 of the
Commission's rules of practice (16 CFR 2.34), notice is hereby given
that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order
to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to
final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record
for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the
allegations in the accompanying complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the
Commission Actions section of the FTC Home Page (for January 16, 1997),
on the World Wide Web, at ``http://www.ftc.gov/os/actions/htm.'' A
paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room H-
130, Sixth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580,
either in person or by calling (202) 326-3627. Public comment is
invited. Such comments or views will be considered by the Commission
and will be available for inspection and copying at its principal
office in accordance with Sec. 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's rules
of practice (16 CFR 4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has agreed to accept, subject to final
approval, a proposed consent order settling charges that Michael P.
McIntyre and The Administrative Company (``TAC'') violated Section 5 of
the Federal Trade Commission Act.
The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for
sixty (60) days for reception of comments by interested persons.
Comments received during this period will become part of the public
record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the
agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the agreement or make final the agreement's proposed
order.
This matter concerns the sale of living trusts to senior citizens
through membership in the American Association for Senior Citizens
(``AASC''). The respondents covered by the proposed order include The
Administrative Company, the company through which all of AASC's
business was conducted, and Michael P. McIntyre, the President of TAC.
The complaint alleges that the respondents violated section 5 of
the Federal Trade Commission Act by making numerous misrepresentations
about the advantages of living trusts over other forms of estate
planning. Specifically, the complaint alleges that respondents have
misrepresented that (1) the use of a living trust avoids all
administrative costs; (2) at death, a living trust ensures that assets
are distributed immediately or almost immediately; (3) a living trust
cannot be challenged; (4) living trusts are prepared by local
attorneys; (5) a living trust protects against catastrophic medical
costs; (6) a living trust is the appropriate estate planning device for
every consumer; and (7) there are no disadvantages to a living trust.
The proposed consent order contains provisions which are designed
to remedy the alleged violations and to prevent the respondents from
engaging in similar acts and practices in the future. The proposed
order would prohibit the respondents from making the misrepresentations
alleged in the complaint and set forth above. Additionally, the order
would require the respondents to disclose to prospective purchasers
that living trusts may be challenged on similar grounds as wills and
that they may not be appropriate in all instances.
Under the order, the respondents also would be required to provide
four affirmative disclosures in situations where the statements would
be true. (1) Some states have created a mechanism for ``informal
probate'' of an estate if the estate meets certain criteria, which
significantly reduces the time involved in probate. This disclosure
would be required in states where informal probate is available. (2) If
the transfer of an individual's assets into the living trust is not
included in the price of creating the living trust, that fact must be
disclosed. (3) If it is the sole responsibility of the purchaser of the
living trust to transfer assets into the trust, that fact must be
disclosed. (4) In some states, but not in others, creditors have a
longer period of time to file claims against a living trust than
against a probated estate. This fact would have to be disclosed in such
states.
The proposed order would require the respondents to distribute the
proposed order to their officers, agents, and all personnel who
participate in any way in respondents' sales activities relating to
living trusts. Additionally, the order would require TAC to notify the
Commission of any changes in its corporate structure, and Michael
McIntyre to notify the Commission of his affiliation with any new
business. The proposed order also requires the respondents to retain
for five years all materials that they rely upon in making
representations covered by the order. Finally, the respondents are
required to file one or more compliance reports detailing their
compliance with the order.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
proposed order, and it is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the agreement and proposed order, nor to modify in
any way their terms. The proposed consent order has been entered into
for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by
the respondents that the
[[Page 5414]]
law has been violated as alleged in the complaint.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2809 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.