Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Federal RegisterOct 10, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-008]
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final results of antidumping duty administrative
review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 6, 1997, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of review of the antidumping duty
order on certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from
Taiwan (62 FR 31070). The review covers one manufacturer/exporter, Yieh
Hsing, of the subject merchandise to the United States and the period
May 1, 1995 through April 30, 1996.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 10, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Linda Ludwig,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone (202) 482-4475/3833.
APPLICABLE STATUTE: Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) are references to the
provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the
amendments made to the Act by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA).
In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the
Department's regulations are to the regulations, codified at 19 CFR
Part 353 (1997).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published an antidumping duty order on certain
circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan on May 7, 1984
(49 FR 19369). The Department published a notice of ``Opportunity To
Request Administrative Review'' of the antidumping duty order for the
1995/1996 review period on May 8, 1996 (61 FR 20791). On May 24, 1996,
the petitioners, Allied Tube & Conduit Corp., Wheatland Tube Company,
Sawhill Tubular Corp., Division of Armco Inc., and Laclede Steel Co.,
filed a request for review of Yieh Hsing Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh
Hsing). We initiated the review of Yieh Hsing on June 25, 1996 (61 FR
32771).
On June 6, 1997, the Department published the preliminary results
of the administrative review. We received comments from Yieh Hsing, and
rebuttal comments from the petitioners. The Department has now
completed this review in accordance with section 751 of the Act.
Scope of the Review
Imports covered by this review are shipments of certain circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes. The Department defines such
merchandise as welded carbon steel pipes and tubes of circular cross
section,with walls not thinner than 0.065 inch and 0.375 inch or more
but not over 4\1/2\ inches in outside diameter. These products are
commonly referred to in the industry as ``standard pipe'' and are
produced to various American Society for Testing
[[Page 52972]]
Materials specifications, most notably A-53, A-120, or A-135. Standard
pipe is currently classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032,
7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description
of the merchandise under investigation is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
We invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results
of this administrative review. As noted above, we received timely
comments from Yieh Hsing, and rebuttal comments from the petitioner.
Comment 1: Yieh Hsing asserts that other discounts are understated
by a factor of 1000 in its home market sales listing. Yieh Hsing
contends that the Department should correct this error in the final
results of review. This error was not disputed by the petitioners.
Department's Position: We agree. During our verification of Yieh
Hsing, we verified that other discounts were understated by a factor of
1000. (See January 29, 1997 verification report of Yieh Hsing, at page
10.) We have amended our calculations to reflect the correct amount for
this expense.
Comment 2: Yieh Hsing contends that in calculating its dumping
margin, the Department improperly compared U.S. prices to a `six-month
window period' surrounding each U.S. sale. Yieh Hsing asserts that the
Department should follow its normal practice, and compare individual
U.S. sales to normal values corresponding to the month of the U.S.
sale.
Petitioners contend that normal values have not been averaged
across a six month period, and that the Department correctly matched
U.S. prices to normal values for the corresponding month.
Department's Position: We have reviewed our preliminary
calculations and determined that we improperly compared U.S. sales to a
weighted-average six-month period in our preliminary results. In these
final results, we have amended our calculations, and based our
calculations of normal value to the month corresponding to the U.S.
sale.
Final Results of Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that a
margin of 0.37 percent exists for Yieh Hsing for the period of June 1,
1995 through May 31, 1996.
The U.S. Customs Service shall assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Individual differences between U.S. price and
normal value may vary from the percentages stated above. The Department
will issue appraisement instructions directly to the U.S. Customs
Service.
Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective
for all shipments of certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and
tubes from Taiwan entered or withdrawn from the warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of
these administrative reviews, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the
Act: (1) No cash deposit shall be required for Yieh Hsing because its
weighted average margin is less than 0.5 percent and therefore de
minimis, (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not
covered in this review but covered in the original less-than-fair-value
(LTFV) investigation or a previous review, the cash deposit will
continue to be the most recent rate published in the final
determination or final results for which the manufacturer or exporter
received a company-specific rate; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review or the original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be that established for the
manufacturer of the merchandise in the final results of these reviews
or the LTFV investigation; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the
manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous reviews or the
original fair value investigation, the cash deposit rate will be 9.7%,
the ``all others'' rate established in the LTFV investigation.
This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26(b) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during these review periods. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Timely written notification of
the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This administrative review and notice are in accordance with
section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.22.
Dated: October 3, 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-27033 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.