National Environmental Policy Act; X-33 Program: Vehicle Design and Flight Demonstration
Federal RegisterOct 2, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 97-142]
National Environmental Policy Act; X-33 Program: Vehicle Design
and Flight Demonstration
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of the final environmental impact
statement (FEIS) for the X-33 Advanced Technology Demonstrator Vehicle
program.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural
Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), and NASA policy and
procedures (14 CFR Part 1216 Subpart 1216.3), NASA has prepared and
issued an FEIS for continuation of Phase II of the X-33 Program, which
involves the development and demonstration of the X-33 test vehicle.
The FEIS addresses environmental issues associated with the testing of
the X-33 technology demonstrator spaceplane, and preparation of the
flight operations (launch) and landing sites. The purpose of the
proposed test program is to demonstrate the feasibility of technology
which could result in commercially viable Reusable Launch Vehicles
(RLVs).
The reasonable alternative launch sites are located within Edwards
Air Force Base (AFB) near Lancaster, California. Reasonable alternative
landing sites evaluated for segments of the flight test activities are
located at Silurian Lake, near Baker, California; China Lake Naval Air
Weapon Station, near Ridgecrest, California; Dugway Proving Ground,
near Tooele, Utah; Grant County Airport, Moses Lake, Washington; and
Malmstrom AFB, Great Falls, Montana. NASA's preferred launch site is
the Haystack Butte site at Edwards AFB. The preferred landing sites are
at Silurian Lake, Dugway Proving Ground, and Malmstrom AFB.
NASA is the lead agency in the preparation of the environmental
impact statement. The U.S. Department of Defense; the U.S. Department
of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management; and the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration are acting as
cooperating agencies.
DATE: NASA will take no final action on the proposed Phase II of the X-
33 Program before November 3, 1997 or 30 days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's notice of availability of the X-33 FEIS, whichever
is later.
ADDRESSES: The FEIS may be reviewed at the following locations:
(a) NASA Headquarters, Library, Room 1J20, 300 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20546.
(b) NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Library, Building 4200,
Huntsville, AL 35812.
[[Page 51698]]
(c) NASA, Dryden Flight Research Center, Library, Building 4800,
Room 2149, Edwards AFB, CA 93523.
(d) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Visitors Lobby, Building 249, 4800
Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 (818-354-5179).
(e) NASA, Spaceport USA, Room 2001, John F. Kennedy Space Center,
FL 32899. Please call Lisa Fowler beforehand at 407-867-2468 so that
arrangements can be made.
(f) Kern County Library, Boron Branch, 27070 Highway 5, Boron, CA
93516.
(g) Kern County Library, Ridgecrest Branch, 131 East Las Flores
Street, Ridgecrest, CA 93555.
(h) Los Angeles County Library, Lancaster Branch, 1150 West Avenue
J, Lancaster, CA 93524.
(i) Palmdale City Library, 700 East Palmdale Boulevard, Palmdale,
CA 93550.
(j) San Bernadino County Library, Barstow Branch, 304 East Buena
Vista, Barstow, CA 92311.
(k) Great Falls Public Library, 301 2nd Avenue North, Great Falls,
MT 59401.
(l) Moses Lake Library, 418 East 5th Street, Moses Lake, WA 98837.
(m) Dugway Proving Ground Library, 5124 Kisstler Avenue, Dugway, UT
84022.
(n) Tooele Library, 47 East Vine Street, Tooele, UT 84074.
(o) Salt Lake City Library, 209 East 500 South, Business/Science
Department, Salt Lake City, UT 84111.
In addition, the FEIS may be examined at the following NASA
locations by contacting the pertinent Freedom of Information Act
Office:
(p) NASA, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 (650-604-
4190).
(q) NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (301-
286-0730).
(r) NASA, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 (281-483-8612).
(s) NASA, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23665 (757-864-
2497).
(t) NASA, Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland,
OH 44135 (216-433-2222).
(u) NASA, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 (601-688-2164).
Limited copies of the FEIS are available, on a first request basis,
by contacting Dr. Rebecca McCaleb at the address, telephone number, or
electronic mail address provided below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Rebecca C. McCaleb, NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, AE01/
Building 4201, Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812; telephone 205-
544-4367; electronic mail ([email protected]).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The X-33 test vehicle is planned as an
approximately one-half scale reusable spaceplane. The vehicle would
launch vertically and land horizontally. The X-33 vehicle would consist
of a lifting body airframe with two cryogenic liquid propellant tanks
(liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOX)) placed within the
aeroshell, and would use two linear aerospike main engines. Water would
be the primary product of the LOX/LH2 combustion. The entire spaceplane
(with all fuel tanks and engines) would launch and land as a single
unit.
During the landing sequence, the spaceplane would be unpowered.
Flight tests would involve speeds of up to Mach 15 and altitudes up to
approximately 75,800 meters (250,000 feet). None of the X-33 test
flights would achieve Earth orbit. Ground operations and servicing
(e.g., checkout, refueling, etc.) would be conducted with ``aircraft
like'' procedures and systems. After each test flight, the X-33 would
be ferried back to the flight operations site by a Boeing 747 aircraft
in a manner similar to that used for the transport of Space Shuttle
orbiters. The test program is currently baselined for a combined total
of 15 flights.
Reasonable alternatives considered for this proposed action
include:
Flight operations (launch) sites:
(a) Edwards Air Force Base, California, Space Port 2000 site, and
(b) Edwards Air Force Base, California, Haystack Butte site;
Short-range landing sites:
(a) Armitage Airfield, China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station,
California, and
(b) Silurian Lake, a dry lake bed, north of Baker, California;
Mid-range landing sites:
(a) Michael Army Air Field, Dugway Proving Ground, Utah;
Long-range landing sites (may serve as an alternative mid-
range landing site):
(a) Malmstrom Air Force Base, Great Falls Montana, and,
(b) Grant County Airport, Moses Lake, Washington; and,--``No
action.'' The ``no action'' alternative (i.e., absence of the X-33
Program) would mean that the RLV Program, as planned could not proceed.
NASA's preferred launch site is the Haystack Butte site at Edwards
AFB. The preferred landing sites are at Silurian Lake (short-range),
Dugway Proving Ground (mid-range), and Malmstrom AFB (long-range).
Based on the preferred set of landing sites, NASA analyzed three
potentially reasonable flight test options:
(a) A baseline plan involving all three landing sites,
(b) A plan involving only Silurian Lake and Malmstrom AFB, and
(c) An option only involving Dugway Proving Ground and Malmstron
AFB.
Comments on the draft environmental impact statement were solicited
from Federal, State and local agencies, organizations, and the general
public through: (a) notices published in the Federal Register--NASA
notice on July 3, 1997 (62 FR 36081), and U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency notice on July 3, 1997 (62 FR 36062; (b) notices in newspapers
of general circulation in areas potentially subject to environmental
impacts and (c) a series of public participation meetings. Comments
received have been addressed in the FEIS.
Benita A. Cooper,
Associate Administrator for Management Systems and Facilities.
[FR Doc. 97-26130 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.