Voluntary Shell Egg Regulations
Federal RegisterAug 11, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 56
[Docket No. PY-97-003]
Voluntary Shell Egg Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to amend the
regulations governing the voluntary shell egg grading program. The
proposed revisions would require electronic digital-display scales be
provided to the grader; provide an alternative grademark for shell
eggs; provide for the use of a ``Produced From'' grademark to
officially identify products that originate from officially graded
shell eggs; and remove the requirement for continuous overflow of water
during the egg washing process. From time to time, sections in the
regulations are affected by changes in egg processing technology. This
rule updates the regulations to reflect these changes.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 10, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Douglas C. Bailey, Chief,
Standardization Branch, Poultry Division, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 0259, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-0259. Comments received may be
inspected at this location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday, except holidays. State that your comments
refer to Docket No. PY-97-003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rex A. Barnes, Chief, Grading Branch,
202-720-3271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule. There are no administrative procedures which
must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of
this rule.
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities as defined in the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601). There
are almost 200 plants using the Agency's shell egg grading services and
many of them are small entities.
The proposal to require electronic digital-display scales will
affect some processors by requiring the purchase of one or more scales
that cost from $150 to $1,000 each. This equipment will improve the
accuracy of egg weight determinations, allowing processors to avoid the
expense incurred when product is unnecessarily retained and re-
processed.
One proposal to establish an alternative form of the USDA grademark
[[Page 42945]]
would allow shell egg processors to use a shield displayed in three
colors to officially identify USDA graded eggs. Similarly, another
proposal would allow producers of products originating from officially
graded shell eggs to use a ``Produced From'' grademark on packaging
materials. These proposals would have no adverse economic impact on
processors.
The proposal to remove the requirement for the continuous overflow
of water during egg washing would conserve water and energy resources,
decrease operating expenses of processors, and lessen the environmental
impact of shell egg processing. This is expected to have a significant
positive economic impact on processors.
Other editorial-type changes would clarify or update the existing
regulations and would have no economic impact on entities using
voluntary shell egg grading services.
For the above reasons, the Agency has certified that this action
will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The information collection requirement in Sec. 56.37 to be amended
by this rule has been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB
Control Number 0581-0127 under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.
Background and Proposed Changes
Shell egg grading is a voluntary program provided under the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended, and is offered on a
fee-for-service basis. It is designed to assist the orderly marketing
of shell eggs by providing for the official certification of egg
quality, quantity, size, temperature, packaging, and other factors.
Changing technology in egg processing requires that the regulations
governing shell egg grading be updated.
Grading personnel certify egg weights according to the official
U.S. weight classes. Today, the highly mechanized, state-of-the-art
equipment used to package shell eggs weighs individual eggs with high
precision to satisfy container weight requirements. For processors to
receive fair, uniform, accurate weight certification, graders need to
have similarly precise scales to certify egg weights. The Agency is
proposing to amend Sec. 56.17(a) by requiring plants to replace balance
or spring-type scales for weighing individual eggs and consumer
packages with electronic digital-display scales.
Many processors want to identify their consumer-pack USDA graded
shell eggs, or products prepared from those eggs, with a USDA
grademark. The Agency is proposing to amend Sec. 56.36 to allow
processors additional flexibility. The proposal would permit the use of
a new grademark that contains horizontal bands of three colors. It
would also provide for the use of a new ``Produced From'' grademark to
officially identify products for which there are no U.S. grade
standards (e.g., pasteurized shell eggs) that are produced from U.S.
Grade AA or Grade A shell eggs. The proposal would also remove the
option of using terms such as ``Federal-State Graded'' within the
grademark because this option is no longer used. Finally, the proposal
would clarify the organization and wording of Sec. 56.36 and would
correct references to Sec. 56.36 that are in Sec. 56.37 and Sec. 56.40.
Egg wash tanks are designed to permit the continuous inflow of
water and, when tank capacity is exceeded, the continuous outflow of
water. Because some water is lost during egg washing due to evaporation
and other causes, a continuous supply of fresh replacement water is
required in order to maintain a proper volume of wash water. A
continuous overflow of water is required by AMS to indicate that an
adequate amount of fresh replacement water is being added. However,
replacement water is not always of a sufficient volume to provide for
continuous overflow, especially at the beginning of shifts or when the
washing equipment is stopped and restarted. This situation, in addition
to new washing and egg cleaning technologies and better production
practices, brought the requirement for a continuous overflow into
question. Therefore, AMS is proposing to amend Sec. 56.76(e)(5) by
omitting the requirement for a continuous overflow of water in shell
egg washers.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 56
Eggs and egg products, Food grades and standards, Food labeling,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, it is proposed that 7 CFR
part 56 be amended as follows:
PART 56--VOLUNTARY GRADING OF SHELL EGGS
1. The heading for part 56 is revised to read as set forth above.
1a. The authority citation for part 56 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
2. In Sec. 56.17, paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) are revised and new
paragraphs (a)(4) and (a)(5) are added to read as follows:
Sec. 56.17 Facilities and equipment for graders.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) Electronic digital-display scales graduated in increments of 1/
10-ounce or less for weighing individual eggs and test weights for
calibrating such scales. Plants packing product based on metric weight
must provide scales graduated in increments of 1-gram or less;
(3) Electronic digital-display scales graduated in increments of 1/
4-ounce or less for weighing the lightest and heaviest consumer
packages packed in the plant and test weights for calibrating such
scales;
(4) Scales graduated in increments of 1/4-pound or less for
weighing shipping containers and test weights for calibrating such
scales;
(5) An acceptable candling light.
* * * * *
3. Section 56.36 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 56.36 Form of grademark and information required.
(a) Form of official identification symbol and grademark. (1) The
shield set forth in Figure 1 of this section shall be the official
identification symbol for purposes of this part and when used,
imitated, or simulated in any manner in connection with shell eggs,
shall be deemed prima facia to constitute a representation that the
product has been officially graded for the purposes of Sec. 56.2.
(2) Except as otherwise authorized, the grademark permitted to be
used to officially identify USDA consumer-graded shell eggs shall be of
the form and design indicated in Figures 2 through 4 of this section.
The shield shall be of sufficient size so that the printing and other
information contained therein is legible and in approximately the same
proportion as shown in Figures 2 through 4 of this section.
(3) The ``Produced From'' grademark in Figure 5 of this section may
be used to identify products approved by the Agency for which there are
no U.S. grade standards (e.g., pasteurized shell eggs) that are
prepared from U.S. Consumer Grade AA or A shell eggs under the
continuous supervision of a grader.
(b) Information required on grademark. (1) Except as otherwise
authorized by the administrator, each grademark used shall include the
letters ``USDA'' and the U.S. grade of the product it identifies, such
as ``A Grade,'' as shown in Figure 2 of this section. Such information
shall be printed with the shield and the wording within the
[[Page 42946]]
shield in contrasting colors in a manner such that the design is
legible and conspicuous on the material upon which it is printed.
(2) The size or weight class of the product, such as ``Large,'' may
appear within the grademark as shown in Figure 3 of this section. If
the size or weight class is omitted from the grademark, it must appear
prominently on the main panel of the carton.
(3) Except as otherwise authorized, the bands of the shield in
Figure 4 of this section shall be displayed in three colors, with the
color of the top, middle, and bottom bands being blue, white, and red,
respectively.
(4) The ``Produced From'' grademark in Figure 5 of this section may
be any one of the designs shown in Figures 2 through 4 of this section.
The text outside the shield shall be conspicuous, legible, and in
approximately the same proportion and close proximity to the shield as
shown in Figure 5 of this section.
(5) The plant number of the official plant preceded by the letter
``P'' must be shown on each carton or packaging material.
Figures to Sec. 56.36
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
[[Page 42947]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11AU97.000
BILLING CODE 3410-02-C
[[Page 42948]]
4. In Sec. 56.37, the first sentence is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 56.37 Lot marking of officially identified product.
Each carton identified with the grademarks shown in Sec. 56.36
shall be legibly lot numbered on either the carton or the consumer
package. * * *
5. In Sec. 56.40, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 56.40 Grading requirements of shell eggs identified with consumer
grademarks.
(a) Shell eggs to be identified with the grademarks illustrated in
Sec. 56.36 must be individually graded by a grader or by authorized
personnel pursuant to Sec. 56.11 and thereafter check graded by a
grader.
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 56.76, the first sentence in paragraph (e)(5) is revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 56.76 Minimum facility and operating requirements for shell egg
grading and packing plants.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) Replacement water shall be added continuously to the wash water
of washers. * * *
* * * * *
Dated: July 31, 1997.
Lon Hatamiya,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 97-20901 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.