Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene Terephthalamide From the Netherlands; Final Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; Correction
Federal RegisterAug 1, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-421-805]
Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene Terephthalamide From
the Netherlands; Final Results of Antidumping Administrative Review;
Correction
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene Terephthalamide from
the Netherlands; Correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORRECTION: On July 16, 1997, the Department published in the Federal
Register the final results of administrative review in connection with
Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene Terephthalamide from the
Netherlands, covering the period June 1, 1995, through May 31, 1996.
(62 FR 38,058) The Department inadvertently omitted the word ``not'' in
the second sentence of the ``Department's Position'' with respect to
Comment 6. Pursuant to 19 CFR 353.28 (d) of the Department's
regulations, we correct this sentence to read: ``As explained at length
in the final results of the first administrative review, the Department
determined not to accept Akzo's accounting method for the amortization
of goodwill expense as reasonable''.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nithya Nagarajan at (202) 482-0193,
Eugenia Chu at (202) 482-3964, or Ellen Knebel at (202) 482-0409,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20230.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Dated: July 22, 1997.
[FR Doc. 97-20282 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.