Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; NAROPINSUPTM/SUP
Federal RegisterJul 18, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 96E-0508]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; NAROPINTM
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for NAROPINTM and is publishing
this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the
Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, Rockville, MD 20857.
[[Page 38566]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health
Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product
NAROPINTM (ropivacaine hydrochloride monohydrate).
NAROPINTM is indicated for the production of local or
regional anesthesia for surgery, for postoperative pain management and
for obstetrical procedures. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and
Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for
NAROPINTM (U.S. Patent No. 4,870,086) from Astra Lakemedel
Aktiebolag, and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's
assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated February 21, 1997, FDA advised the
Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product had undergone
a regulatory review period and that the approval of
NAROPINTM represented the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
NAROPINTM is 3,147 days. Of this time, 2,603 days occurred
during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 544
days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: February
14, 1988. The applicant claims February 15, 1988, as the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) for NAROPINTM
(IND 31,121) became effective. However, FDA records indicate that the
effective date for IND 31,121 was February 14, 1988, which was 30 days
after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act: March 31, 1995. The applicant claims March 29, 1995,
as the date the new drug application (NDA) for NAROPINTM
(NDA 20-533) was initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate
that NDA 20-533 was submitted on March 31, 1995.
3. The date the application was approved: September 24, 1996. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 20-533 was approved on
September 24, 1996.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,400 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is
incorrect may, on or before September 16, 1997, submit to the Dockets
Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a
redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA,
on or before January 14, 1998, for a determination regarding whether
the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the
regulatory review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets
Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that
individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and
petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: July 8, 1997.
Allen B. Duncan,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-18917 Filed 7-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.