Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review
Federal RegisterJul 3, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.
Summary of Proposal(s)
(1) Collection Title: Investigation of Claim for Possible Days of
Employment or State Benefits Received.
(2) Form(s) submitted: ID-5i, ID-5R(Sup), ID-49R, and UI-48.
(3) OMB Number: 3220-0049.
(4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 08/31/1997.
(5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
(6) Respondents: Individuals or households, business or other for-
profit, state, local or tribal government.
(7) Estiamted annual number of respondents: 5,900.
(8) Total annual responses: 5,900.
(9) Total annual reporting hours: 1,388.
(10) Collection description: Under the Railroad Unemployment
Insurance Act, unemployment or sickness benefits are not payable for
any day in which remuneration is payable or accrues to the claimant.
The collection obtains information from the claimant, railroad, and
non-railroad employers and state agencies about work performed and/or
benefits received during the same periods as benefits are claimed.
Additional Information or Comments: Copies of the forms and
supporting documents can be obtained form Chuck Mierzwa, the agency
clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information
collection should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement
Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB
reviewer, Laura Oliven (202)-395-7316), Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C.
20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-17432 Filed 7-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.