Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in Alabama
Federal RegisterJun 23, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Field Office
Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in
Alabama
AGENCY: Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) in Alabama, U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in Section IV of the
FOTG of the NRCS in Alabama for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRC in Alabama to issue conservation
practice standard, Well Decommissioning (Code 351) Section IV of the
FOTG.
DATES: Comments will be received on or before July 23, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to Ronnie D.
Murphy, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS), 3381
[[Page 33827]]
Skyway Drive, P.O. Box 311, Auburn, AL 36830. Copies of the practice
standards will be made available upon written request.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS
in Alabama will receive comments relative to the proposed changes.
Following that period a determination will be made by the NRCS in
Alabama regarding disposition of those comments and a final
determination on change will be made.
Ray Donaldson,
Assistant State Conservation, Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Auburn, Alabama.
[FR Doc. 97-16152 Filed 6-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.