North Dakota Regulatory Program

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 934

[SPATS No. ND-036-FOR; State Program Amendment No. XVIV]

North Dakota Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public

hearing on proposed amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) is

announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the North Dakota

regulatory program (hereinafter, the

[[Page 30801]]

``North Dakota program'') under the Surface Mining Control and

Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The proposed amendment consists of

repealing statutes pertaining to the Reclamation Research Advisory

Committee. The amendment is intended to revise the North Dakota program

to improve operational efficiency.

DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m. m.d.t. July 7,

1997. If requested, a public hearing on the proposed amendment will be

held on June 30, 1997. Requests to present oral testimony at the

hearing must be received by 4:00 p.m., m.d.t. on June 20, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed or hand delivered to the

Field Office Director's name and address listed below. Mr. Guy Padgett,

Director, Casper Field Office, U.S. Office of Surface Mining, 100 East

``B'' Street, Room 2128, Casper, Wyoming 82601-1918.

Copies of the North Dakota program, the proposed amendment, and all

written comments received in response to this document will be

available for public review at the addresses listed below during

business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Each

requester may receive one free copy of the proposed amendment by

contacting OSM's Casper Field Office.

Mr. Guy Padgett, Director, Casper Field Office, U.S. Office of Surface

Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 100 East ``B'' Street, Room 2128,

Casper, Wyoming 82601-1918

Mr. James R. Deutsch, Director, Reclamation Division, Public Service

Commission, State Capitol--600 E. Boulevard, Bismarck, North Dakota

58505-0480, Telephone: 701/328-2400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Guy Padgett, Telephone: 307/261-6550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the North Dakota Program

On December 15, 1980, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally

approved the North Dakota program. General background information on

the North Dakota program, including the Secretary's findings, the

disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of the North Dakota

program can be found in the December 15, 1980 Federal Register (45 FR

82214). Subsequent actions concerning North Dakota's program and

program amendments can be found at 30 CFR 934.15, 934.16, and 934.30.

II. Proposed Amendment

By letter dated May 2, 1997, North Dakota submitted a proposed

amendment to its program pursuant to SMCRA (Amendment number XXIV),

administrative record No. ND-Y-01, 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). North

Dakota submitted the proposed amendment on its own initiative. The

provisions of the North Dakota Century Code that North Dakota proposed

to delete were: NDCC 38-14.1-04.1, Reclamation research advisory

committee; NDCC 38-14.1-04.2, Advisory Committee responsibilities; NDCC

38-14.1-04.3, Reclamation research objective.

Specifically, North Dakota proposed to repeal the provisions in its

law that set up its Reclamation Research Advisory Committee since this

committee is no longer necessary.

III. Public Comment Procedures

In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is

seeking comments on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the

applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If the amendment

is deemed adequate, it will become part of the North Dakota program.

1. Written Comments

Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues

proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the

commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated

under DATES or at locations other than the Casper Field Office will not

necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included in the

administrative record.

2. Public Hearing

Persons wishing to testify at the public hearing should contact the

person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m.,

m.d.t. on June 20, 1997. Any disabled individual who has need for a

special accommodation to attend a public hearing should contact the

individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The location

and time of the hearing will be arranged with those persons requesting

the hearing. If no one requests an opportunity to testify at the public

hearing, the hearing will not be held.

Filing of a written statement at the time of the hearing is

requested as it will greatly assist the transcriber. Submission of

written statements in advance of the hearing will allow OSM officials

to prepare adequate responses and appropriate questions.

The public hearing will continue on the specified date until all

persons scheduled to testify have been heard. Persons in the audience

who have not been scheduled to testify, and who wish to do so, will be

heard following those who have been scheduled. The hearing will end

after all persons scheduled to testify and persons present in the

audience who wish to testify have been heard.

3. Public Meeting

If only one person requests an opportunity to testify at a hearing,

a public meeting, rather than a public hearing, may be held. Persons

wishing to meet with OSM representatives to discuss the proposed

amendment may request a meeting by contacting the person listed under

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meeting will be open to the

public and, if possible, notices of meetings will be posted at the

locations listed under ADDRESSES. A written summary of each meeting

will be made a part of the administrative record.

IV. Procedural Determinations

1. Executive Order 12866

This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and

Review).

2. Executive Order 12988

The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required

by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has

determined that this rule meets the applicable standards of subsections

(a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not

applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and

program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated

by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA

(30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11,

732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory

programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based

solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with

SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other

requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.

3. National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since

section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency

decisions on proposed State regulatory program

[[Page 30802]]

provisions do not constitute major Federal actions within the meaning

of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42

U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).

4. Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain information collection requirements that

require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507 et seq.).

5. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will

not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).

The State submittal that is the subject of this rule is based upon

counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was

prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a

significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small

entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements

previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In

making the determination as to whether this rule would have a

significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and

assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.

6. Unfunded Mandates

This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any

given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 934

Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

Dated: May 29, 1997.

Richard J. Seibel,

Regional Director, Western Regional Coordinating Center.

[FR Doc. 97-14728 Filed 6-4-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-05-M