Open Video Systems

Federal RegisterMay 13, 1997

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 1 and 76

[CS Docket No. 96-46; FCC 97-130]

Open Video Systems

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fourth Report and Order adopts and modifies rules and

policies concerning open video systems. The Fourth Report and Order

amends our regulations to reflect the provisions of the

Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the ``1996 Act'') which pertain to the

filing requirements for certification applications, comments and

oppositions, Notices of Intent and complaints concerning channel

carriage. This item further fulfills Congress' mandate in adopting the

1996 Act and will provide guidance to open video system certification

applicants, open video system operators, video programming providers

and consumers concerning open video systems.

DATES: Effective upon approval of the OMB, but no sooner than June 12,

1997. The Commission will publish a document at a later date notifying

the public as to the effective date. Written comments by the public on

the modified information collections are due on or before June 12,

1997. Written comments must be submitted by OMB on the modified

information collections on or before July 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: A copy of any comments on the modified information

collections contained herein should be submitted to Dorothy Conway,

Federal Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to [email protected], and to

Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725--17th Street, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Fleming, Cable Services

Bureau, (202) 418-7200. For additional information concerning the

information collections contained herein contact Dorothy Conway at 202-

418-0217, or via the Internet at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's

Fourth Report and Order in CS Docket No. 96-46, FCC 97-130, adopted

April 10, 1997 and released April 15, 1997. The full text of this

decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business

hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW,

Washington, D.C. 20554, and may be purchased from the Commission's copy

contractor, International Transcription Service, (202) 857-3800, 1919 M

Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20554.

The Fourth Report and Order contains modified information

collections. It has been submitted to OMB for review, as required by

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The Commission, as part of its

continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general

public and OMB to comment on the information collections contained in

the Fourth Report and Order. Comments should address: (a) whether the

proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality,

utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of information on the

respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or

other forms of information technology.

OMB Approval Number: 3060-0700.

Title: Open Video Systems Provisions.

Form Number: FCC Form 1275.

Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.

Respondents: Businesses and other for-profit entities; state, local

and tribal governments.

Number of Respondents: 748. (10 OVS operators, 250 video

programming providers that may request additional Notice of Intent

information, file rate complaints, or dispute cases, 60 broadcast

stations that may elect type of carriage and make network non-

duplication notifications, 100 programming providers that may make

notice of invalid rights claimed, 300 must-carry list requesters, 28

oppositions to OVS operator certifications.)

Number of Responses: 3,754. (14 certification filings/refilings,

250 requests for additional Notice of Intent information, 250 responses

to requests for additional Notice of Intent information, 10 Notices of

Intent, 50 rate complaints, 50 rate justifications, 60 carriage

elections, 10 must-carry recordkeepers, 300 must-carry list requests,

300 provisions of must-carry lists, 1,200 notifications of network non-

duplication rights to OVS operators, 100 programming provider

notifications of invalid rights claimed, 1,100 OVS operator

notifications to programming providers, 28 oppositions to

certifications, 20 dispute case complainants, and 20 dispute case

defendants.)

[[Page 26236]]

Estimated Burden to Respondents: Section 76.1502 Certification: We

estimate that prospective OVS operators will make a total of 14

certification filings and refilings on an annual basis. The average

burden to OVS operators for all aspects of each filing and refiling

process, including serving copies to appropriate entities, is estimated

to be 2 hours apiece; therefore 14 filings and refilings x 2 = 28

hours. We estimate there will be an average of 2 oppositions to each

filing and refiling. The average burden entities will undergo in

drafting and filing each opposition with the Commission's Office of the

Secretary and Cable Services Bureaus is estimated to be 4 hours. 14

filings and refilings x 2 oppositions each x 4 hours for each

opposition = 112 hours.

Section 76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open

video systems: We currently estimate 10 Notices of Intent will be filed

on an annual basis. The average number of entities that prospective OVS

operators must notify with each Notice of Intent is estimated to be 45.

The average burden for each OVS operator to undergo all aspects of the

Notice of Intent process, including serving copies to all entities is

estimated to be 8 hours; therefore 10 Notices x 8 hours each = 80

hours. We estimate that the number of written requests for additional

information that will be received subsequent to Notices of Intent will

be 25 per Notice of Intent. 10 Notices x 25 requests for additional

information = 250. The average burden to prospective video programming

providers to make each written request is estimated to be 2 hours

apiece; therefore 10 x 25 x 2 = 500 hours. The average burden to

each OVS operator to provide the additional information to the entire

group of prospective video programming providers who requested

additional information is estimated to be 8 hours apiece; therefore 10

Notices x 8 hours = 80 hours.

Section 76.1504 Rates, terms and conditions of carriage on open

video systems: We estimate that video programming providers will file

an average of 5 complaints against each OVS operator per year;

therefore 10 OVS operators x 5 complaints = 50 complaints. We

estimate the average burden to draft and file a complaint is 1 hour;

therefore 50 complaints x 1 hour = 50 hours. We estimate the burden

for OVS operators to undergo all aspects of the rate justification

process to be 20 hours per justification; therefore 10 OVS operators

x 5 justifications x 20 hours for each justification = 1,000 hours.

Section 76.1506 Carriage of television broadcast signals: We

estimate there are 10 OVS operators, each with an estimated average

number of 6 broadcast stations in each OVS operator's area of carriage.

We estimated the average burden to broadcast stations for each election

for must-carry or retransmission consent to be 2 hours per election;

therefore 10 x 6 x 2 hours = 120 hours. The estimated annual

recordkeeping burden for OVS operators to maintain list of broadcast

stations carried in fulfillment of must-carry requirements is 4 hours

per OVS operator; therefore 10 x 4 = 40 hours. The estimated annual

number of written requests received by OVS operators is 30 per OVS

operator; therefore 10 x 30 = 300. The burden for completing written

requests: .25 hours per request; therefore 10 x 30 x .25 = 75

hours. The burden to OVS operators to respond to requests: .25 hours

per request; therefore 10 x 30 x .25 = 75 hours.

Section 76.1508 Network non-duplication, Section 76.1509 Syndicated

program exclusivity: We estimated number of notices to be filed by

television broadcast stations in order to notify OVS operators of

exclusive or non-duplication rights being exercised is 6 stations in

each OVS operator's area of carriage x 20 estimated annual

notifications x 10 OVS operators = 1,200. The burden to television

stations to make notifications is estimated to be .5 hours per notice;

therefore 1,200 x .5 = 600 hours. We estimate the annual number of

notices filed by programming providers to notify OVS operators that the

sports exclusivity rights claimed are invalid to be 100. The burden to

programming providers to make notifications is estimated to be .5 hours

per notice; therefore 100 x .5 hours = 50 hours. The burden for each

OVS operator to make notifications available to all programming

providers on their systems: 1 hour per notification x 1,100

occurrences = 1,100 hours.

Section 76.1513 Dispute resolution: We estimate there will be 20

initial notices filed by complainants annually as well as 20

defendants' responses to notices filed. The average burden for each

notice and response is estimated to be 4 hours apiece; therefore 40 x

4 = 160 hours. We estimate that the 20 annual notices will result in

the initiation of 10 dispute cases. The average burden for complainants

and defendants for undergoing all aspects of the dispute case is

estimated to be 25 hours per case; therefore 20 (10 complainants + 10

defendants) x 25 = 500 hours.

Total Annual Burden to respondents: 4,570 hours, as calculated

above.

Estimated Costs to Respondents: Section 76.1502 Certification:

Costs of stationery, diskettes, and postage at $10 for 14 Form 1275

filings/refilings sent to the Commission and all applicable local

communities = $140. Costs of stationery and postage at $2 apiece for 28

sets of opposition filings = $56.

Section 76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open

video systems: Costs of stationery and postage at $2 apiece for (10

Notices of Intent x 45 entities) + 250 requests for additional

information + 250 responses to requests for additional information =

$1,900.

Section 76.1504 Rates, terms and conditions of carriage on open

video systems: Costs of stationery and postage at $2 apiece for 50 rate

complaints + 50 rate justifications = $200.

Section 76.1506 Carriage of television broadcast signals: Costs of

stationery and postage at $2 apiece for 60 carriage elections + 300

requests for lists + 300 provisions of lists = $1,320.

Section 76.1508 Network non-duplication, Section 76.1509 Syndicated

program exclusivity: Costs of stationery and postage at $2 apiece for

1,200 notifications to OVS operators + 100 notifications of invalid

rights claimed + 1,100 OVS operator notifications to programming

providers = $4,800.

Section 76.1513 Dispute resolution: Costs of stationery and postage

at $2 apiece for 20 notices + 20 responses to notices = $80. Costs of

stationery and postage at $10 apiece for 10 complainants in dispute

cases + 10 defendants in dispute cases = $200. $80 + $200 = $280.

Total Annual Cost to respondents: $8,696 as calculated above.

Needs and Uses: The information collections contained herein, which

are necessary to implement the statutory provisions for Open Video

Systems contained in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, have been

previously approved by OMB under OMB control number 3060-0700. The

following summary addresses only changes that have been adopted by the

Commission in its Fourth Report and Order.

I. Introduction

1. On February 8, 1996, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 added

Section 653 to the Communications Act of 1934, establishing open video

systems as a new framework for entry into the video programming

marketplace. Subsequently, the Commission adopted a series of orders

prescribing rules and policies governing the establishment and

operation of open video systems. The Commission has 10 calendar days

from receipt of a complete FCC Form 1275 to issue an order approving or

disapproving the certification. Upon receipt of a complete FCC Form

1275, the Commission will

[[Page 26237]]

publish a notice of the filing in the Daily Digest and post the filing

on the Commission's Internet site. Comments or oppositions to the

certification must be received by the Office of the Secretary within

five days of the applicant's filing and must be served upon the

applicant. The FCC Form 1275 will be deemed approved if the Commission

does not disapprove the filing within the 10 calendar day time period.

If the Commission disapproves the FCC Form 1275, the applicant may file

a revised FCC Form 1275 or refile its original submission with a

statement addressing the issues in dispute as stated in our order

disapproving the filing.

2. Based on the experiences of recent open video system

certification proceedings, we believe that certain modifications to the

open video system procedures will benefit both the parties and the

Commission. The intent of this Fourth Report and Order is to revise our

procedures for both the filing of certification applications and the

filing of comments and oppositions to provide the most efficient

processing of applications for certification, given the limited 10-day

statutory deadline for deciding certification applications.

3. Section 553 of the Administrative Procedures Act (``APA'')

provides that an agency must provide notice of proposed rules in the

Federal Register and afford an opportunity for interested persons to

present their views. However, rules of ``agency organization,

procedure, or practice'' are exempted from the APA's notice and comment

requirement. We find that the changes in the Commission's open video

system procedures proposed in this Fourth Report and Order fit within

this exception because they are purely ministerial and do not alter the

rights of interested parties. The purpose of these changes is to

organize the Commission's internal procedures to provide for a more

efficient processing of applications for certification. Accordingly, we

issue this Fourth Report and Order without providing for a prior notice

and comment period.

II. Certification Application

4. To date, certain certification applications that were submitted

were found to be improperly filed with the Commission because the

accompanying diskettes were not properly formatted. Parties are

reminded that all certification applications must be filed on 3.5

diskettes formatted in an IBM compatible form using Wordperfect 5.1 for

Windows and Excel 4.0 software. Attachments are part of the application

package and, therefore, are subject to the same diskette requirements

as the application, unless technologically infeasible. In addition, we

remind parties that a hard copy and a diskette copy of the FCC Form

1275 and all attachments must be filed with both the Office of the

Secretary and the Office of the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau. In

order to ensure the prompt delivery of the application and related

pleadings to the staff person responsible for its review, parties are

required to attach a cover sheet to the filing and related pleadings

indicating that the submission is either an open video system

certification application or related pleadings. Specifically, for an

open video system certification application, the only wording on this

cover sheet shall be ``Open Video System Certification Application''

and ``Attention: Cable Services Bureau.'' Similarly, for pleadings

related to an open video system application, the only wording on this

cover sheet shall be ``Open Video System Certification Application

Comments'' and ``Attention: Cable Services Bureau.'' In either case,

the wording shall be located in the center of the page and should be in

letters at least \1/2\ inch in size. For the purpose of open video

system certification applications and related pleadings, we are also

modifying our mailing address by requiring applications to be filed

with the Office of the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau as well as

with the Office of the Secretary. Parties shall include the words

``open video systems'' on their mailing envelopes.

III. Filing Comments or Oppositions

5. In several instances, comments or oppositions filed with the

Office of the Secretary were not also filed with, or served on, the

Cable Services Bureau. Due to the short review period for certification

applications, we now require parties wishing to respond to an FCC Form

1275 filing to submit comments or oppositions simultaneously to the

Office of the Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau.

Comments will not be considered timely filed unless filed with both

offices. Untimely filed comments will not be deemed properly filed, and

will not be considered by the Commission.

IV. Calculation of Response Period

6. Under the current rule, comments or oppositions must be filed

within five days of the applicant's filing. The Commission has 10

calendar days from receipt of a complete FCC Form 1275 to issue an

order approving or disapproving the certification. Intermediate

holidays are not counted in determining the commenters' five-day

response period, but are counted in determining the Commission's review

period. These two rules, taken together, could lead to a situation

where the Commission's order could be due on the same day that comments

are due, effectively denying the Commission an opportunity to review

the comments in rendering its decision.

7. Accordingly, in this Fourth Report and Order we now modify this

rule to provide that comments or oppositions must be received by the

Office of the Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau

within five calendar days of the applicant's filing and served upon the

applicant. Intermediate holidays (e.g. Saturday, Sunday, and other

officially recognized federal holidays) will be counted in determining

the due date for filing comments and oppositions. If, after making the

necessary calculations, the due date for filing comments falls on a

holiday, comments shall be filed on the next business day before noon,

unless the nearest business day precedes the fifth calendar day

following a filing, in which case the comments will be due on the

preceding business day. We note that this modification of our

computation of time regulations applies solely to the open video system

certification process.

V. Certification Denials

8. If the Commission denies certification to an applicant, the

applicant may file a revised FCC Form 1275 or refile its original

submission with a statement addressing the issues in dispute as stated

in our order disapproving the filing. Applicants to operate an open

video system must serve such refilings on any objecting party from the

previous proceeding and on all local communities in which the applicant

intends to operate. The Commission will consider any revised or refiled

FCC Form 1275 to be a new proceeding. Commenters from the original

proceeding must refile their original comments if they think such

comments should be considered in the subsequent proceeding. All

persons, however, remain free to file new comments in response to a

refiled FCC Form 1275.

VI. Channel Allocation and Carriage Dispute Resolution Proceedings

9. In order to commence the channel allocation process, an operator

is required to file a Notice of Intent with the Commission. The

Commission then releases the Notice of Intent to the public. As part of

that release, the Cable

[[Page 26238]]

Services Bureau is required to publish the Notice on the Internet. In

order to ensure the prompt delivery of such notices to the staff

persons responsible for their review, we now require parties to include

the word ``open video systems'' on their mailing envelopes. Parties are

also now required to attach a cover sheet to the filing indicating that

the submission is an Open Video System Notice of Intent. Specifically,

for a Notice of Intent, the only wording on this cover sheet shall be

``Open Video System Notice of Intent'' and ``Attention: Cable Services

Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in the center of the page and

should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in size. Parties shall include

the words ``open video systems'' on their mailing envelopes. Parties

shall submit the Notice of Intent and related pleadings simultaneously

to the Office of the Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services

Bureau.

10. Additionally, pursuant to Section 653(a)(2) of the 1996

Telecommunications Act, the Commission has the authority to resolve

disputes regarding open video system channel carriage. In order to

conform our procedures for the filing of such complaints with our

procedures for other open video system matters, parties are now

required to include the words ``open video systems'' on their mailing

envelopes. Parties are also now required to submit the complaint and

materials related to these proceedings simultaneously to the Office of

the Secretary and the Office of the Bureau Chief, Cable Services

Bureau. Such pleadings must include a cover sheet indicating that the

submission is either an Open Video System Channel Carriage Complaint or

related pleading. In either case, the only wording on this cover sheet

shall be ``Open Video System Channel Carriage Dispute Resolution'' and

``Attention: Cable Services Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in

the center of the page and should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in

size.

VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis

11. The requirements adopted in this Fourth Report and Order have

been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the

``PRA'') and found to impose modified information collection

requirements on the public. Implementation of any modified requirement

will be subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget

(``OMB'') as prescribed by the PRA. The Commission, as part of its

continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general

public and other Federal agencies to comment on the information

collections contained in this Fourth Report and Order as required by

the PRA. Comments should address: (1) Whether the proposed collection

of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions

of the Commission, including whether the information shall have

practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the Commission's burden

estimates; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and, (4) ways to minimize the burden of the

collection of information on the respondents, including the use of

automated collection techniques or other forms of information

technology.

12. Written comments must be submitted by the Office of Management

and Budget on the proposed and/or modified information collections on

or before July 14, 1997. A copy of any comments on the information

collections contained herein should be submitted to Dorothy Conway,

Federal Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to [email protected]. For

additional information concerning the information collections contained

herein contact Dorothy Conway at 202-418-0217, or via the Internet at

[email protected].

VIII. Ordering Clauses

13. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to Section 4(i),

4(j), 303(r), and 653 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47

U.S.C. Secs. 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 573 of the rules, requirements

and policies discussed in this order are adopted and Section 76.1502(e)

of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR Sec. 76.1502 is amended as set forth

below.

14. It is further ordered that the requirements and regulations

established in this decision shall become effective upon approval by

OMB of the new information collection requirements adopted herein, but

no sooner than June 12, 1997.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Parts 1 and 76

Cable television.

Federal Communications Commission

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

Rule Changes

Accordingly Parts 1 and 76 of Title 47 are amended as follows:

PART 1--PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 207, 303 and 309(j).

2. Section 1.4 is amended by revising paragraphs (g), (j), and (k)

to read as follows:

Sec. 1.4 Computation of time.

* * * * *

(g) Unless otherwise provided (e.g., Secs. 1.773 and 76.1502(e)(1)

of this chapter), if the filing period is less than 7 days,

intermediate holidays shall not be counted in determining the filing

date.

* * * * *

(j) Unless otherwise provided (e.g. Sec. 76.1502(e) of this

chapter) if, after making all the computations provided for in this

section, the filing date falls on a holiday, the document shall be

filed on the next business day. See paragraph (e)(1) of this section.

(k) Where specific provisions of part 1 conflict with this section,

those specific provisions of part 1 are controlling. See,

e.g.,Secs. 1.45(d), 1.773(a)(3) and 1.773(b)(2). Additionally, where

Sec. 76.1502(e) of this chapter conflicts with this section, those

specific provisions of Sec. 76.1502 are controlling. See e.g. 47 CFR

76.1502(e).

PART 76--CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE

3. The authority citation for Part 76 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154, 301, 302, 303, 303a,

307, 308, 309, 312, 315, 317, 325, 503, 521, 522, 531, 532, 533,

534, 5353, 536, 537, 543, 544, 544a, 545, 548, 552, 554, 556, 558,

560, 561, 571, 572, 573.

4. Section 76.1502 is amended by revising paragraphs (d) and (e),

and adding new paragraph (f) to read as follows:

Sec. 76.1502 Certification.

* * * * *

(d) Parties are required to attach a cover sheet to the filing

indicating that the submission is an open video system certification

application. The only wording on this cover sheet shall be ``Open Video

System Certification Application'' and ``Attention: Cable Services

Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in the center of the page and

should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in size. Parties shall also

include the words ``open video systems'' on their mailing envelope.

(e) (1) Comments or oppositions to a certification must be filed

within five calendar days of the Commission's receipt of the

certification and must be served on the party that filed the

certification. If, after making the necessary calculations, the due

date for

[[Page 26239]]

filing comments falls on a holiday, comments shall be filed on the next

business day before noon, unless the nearest business day precedes the

fifth calendar day following a filing, in which case the comments will

be due on the preceding business day. For example, if the fifth day

falls on a Saturday, then the filing would be due on that preceding

Friday. However, if the fifth day falls on Sunday, then the filing will

be due on the next day, Monday, before noon (or Tuesday, before noon if

the Monday is a holiday).

(2) Parties wishing to respond to a FCC Form 1275 filing must

submit comments or oppositions with the Office of the Secretary and the

Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Comments will not be considered

properly filed unless filed with both of these Offices. Parties are

required to attach a cover sheet to the filing indicating that the

submission is a pleading related to an open video system application,

the only wording on this cover sheet shall be ``Open Video System

Certification Application Comments.'' This wording shall be located in

the center of the page and should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in

size. Parties shall also include the words ``open video systems'' on

their mailing envelopes.

(f) If the Commission does not disapprove the certification

application within ten days after receipt of an applicant's request,

the certification application will be deemed approved. If disapproved,

the applicant may file a revised certification or refile its original

submission with a statement addressing the issues in dispute. Such

refilings must be served on any objecting party or parties and on all

local communities in which the applicant intends to operate. The

Commission will consider any revised or refiled FCC Form 1275 to be a

new proceeding and any party who filed comments regarding the original

FCC Form 1275 will have to refile their original comments if they think

such comments should be considered in the subsequent proceeding.

5. Section 76.1503 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)

introductory text to read as follows:

Sec. 76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open video

systems.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(1) Notification. An open video system operator shall file with the

Secretary of the Federal Communications Commission a ``Notice of

Intent'' to establish an open video system, which the Commission will

release in a Public Notice. Parties are required to attach a cover

sheet to the filing indicating that the submission is an Open Video

System Notice of Intent. The only wording on this cover sheet shall be

``Open Video System Notice of Intent'' and ``Attention: Cable Services

Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in the center of the page and

should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in size. Parties shall also

include the words ``open video systems'' on their mailing envelopes.

Parties must submit copies of the Notice of Intent with the Office of

the Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau. The Notice

of Intent shall include the following information:

* * * * *

6. Section 76.1513 is amended by adding new paragraphs (d)(8) and

(d)(9) to read as follows:

Sec. 76.1513 Dispute resolution.

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(8) Parties are required to submit the complaint and materials

related to these proceedings simultaneously to the Office of the

Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau.

(9) Pleadings must include a cover sheet indicating that the

submission is either an Open Video System Channel Carriage Complaint or

related pleading. In either case, the only wording on this cover sheet

shall be ``Open Video System Channel Carriage Dispute Resolution'' and

``Attention: Cable Services Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in

the center of the page and should be in letters at least \1/2\ in size.

Parties shall also include the words ``open video systems'' on their

mailing envelopes.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 97-11973 Filed 5-12-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.