Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware from Mexico; Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Administrative Review
Federal RegisterApr 8, 1996
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-201-504]
Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware from Mexico; Final Results of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Administrative Review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On February 9, 1996, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) issued preliminary results of a new shipper administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on porcelain-on-steel cooking ware
(POS cooking ware) from Mexico (61 FR 4957). The review covers one
manufacturer/exporter of the subject merchandise, Esmaltaciones San
Ignacio, S.A. (San Ignacio) to the United States during the period
January 1, 1995 through June 30, 1995.
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our
preliminary results and no comments were received. Therefore, the final
results remain unchanged from the preliminary results. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for the reviewed firm is listed below
in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 8, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Merchant or Thomas Futtner,
Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-5253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicable Statute and Regulations
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are
references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective
date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act), by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise
indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the
current regulations, as amended by the interim regulations published in
the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).
Background
On February 9, 1996, the Department issued preliminary results (61
FR 4957) of its new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on
porcelain-on-steel cooking ware from Mexico (51 FR 43415, December 2,
1986). The preliminary results indicated that San Ignacio sold subject
merchandise at not less than normal value during the POR. We invited
parties to comment on the preliminary results.
The Department has now conducted this review in accordance with
section 751 of the Act and section 353.22 of its regulations.
Scope of the Review
Imports covered by the review are shipments of POS cooking ware,
including tea kettles, which do not have self-contained electric
heating elements. All of the foregoing are constructed of steel and are
enameled or glazed with vitreous glasses.
This merchandise is currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule (HTS) item number 7323.94.00. Kitchenware currently entering
under HTS item number 7323.94.00.30 is not subject to the order. The
HTS item number is provided for convenience and Customs purposes. The
written description remains dispositive.
Final Results of Review
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our
preliminary results. We received no comments. The final results remain
unchanged from the preliminary results as the Department used the same
methodology described in the preliminary results. As a result of our
comparison of the export price (EP) and normal value (NV), we determine
that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/Exporter Margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
San Ignacio.................................................... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the
determination and for future deposits of estimated duties. The posting
of a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and section 353.22(h)(4) of the
Department's regulations, will no longer be permitted for this firm.
The Department will issue appraisement instructions directly to the
Customs Service.
Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective
for all shipments of the subject merchandise, entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of
these final results of this administrative review, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the
reviewed company will be zero percent; (2) for exporters not covered in
this review, but covered in previous reviews or the original less-than-
fair-value (LTFV) investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to
be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered by this review, or the original
LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters not previously reviewed will continue to be
29.52 percent, the ``All Others'' rate made effective by the final
results of review published on January 9, 1995 (see Notice of Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 60 FR 2378) and as
amended on February 8, 1995 (60 FR 7521). This is the ``All Others''
rate from the LTFV investigation.
These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication
of the final results of the next administrative review.
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this
[[Page 15464]]
review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in
the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(d)(1). Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This new shipper administrative review and notice are in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(2)(B)) and 19
CFR 353.22(h).
Dated: March 27, 1996.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary, for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-8516 Filed 4-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.