Milk in the Central Arizona Marketing Area; Proposed Suspension of Certain Provisions of the Order

Federal RegisterMar 13, 1996

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SUMMARY: This document invites written comments on a proposal to

suspend certain provisions of the Central Arizona Federal milk

marketing order for an indefinite period beginning April 1, 1996. The

proposed suspension would continue a suspension which expires on March

31, 1996, that eliminates the requirement that a cooperative

association ship at least 50 percent of its receipts to other handler

pool plants to maintain pool status of a manufacturing plant operated

by the cooperative. United Dairymen of Arizona, a cooperative

association that represents nearly all of the producers who supply milk

to the market, has requested continuation of the suspension. The

cooperative asserts that the suspension is necessary to prevent

uneconomical and inefficient movements of milk.

DATES: Comments are due no later than March 20, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments (two copies) should be filed with the USDA/AMS/

Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, Room 2971, South Building,

P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clifford M. Carman, Marketing

Specialist, USDA/AMS/Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, Room

2971, South Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456, (202)

720-9368.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.

601-612) requires the Agency to examine the impact of a proposed rule

on small entities. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator of

the Agricultural Marketing Service has certified that this proposed

rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. This rule would tend to ensure that dairy

farmers would continue to have their milk priced under the order and

thereby receive the benefits that accrue from such pricing.

The Department is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with

Executive Order 12866.

This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778,

Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have a retroactive

effect. If adopted, this proposed rule will not preempt any state or

local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an

irreconcilable conflict with the rule.

The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7

U.S.C. 601-674), provides that administrative proceedings must be

exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section

608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with

the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provisions of the

order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in

accordance with law and request a modification of an order or to be

exempted from the order. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a

hearing on the petition. After a hearing, the Secretary would rule on

the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United

States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has

its principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review

the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is

filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the provisions of the

Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act, the suspension of the following

provision of the order regulating the handling of milk in the Central

Arizona marketing area is being considered for an indefinite period

beginning April 1, 1996:

In Sec. 1131.7(c), the words ``50 percent or more of,''

``(including the skim milk and butterfat in fluid milk products

transferred from its own plant pursuant to this paragraph that is not

in excess of the skim milk and butterfat contained in member producer

milk actually received at such plant)'' and ``or the previous 12-month

period ending with the current month.''

All persons who want to submit written data, views or arguments

about the proposed suspension should send two copies of their views to

the USDA/AMS/Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, Room 2971, South

Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456, by the 7th day

after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The period

for filing comments is limited to 7 days because a longer period would

not provide the time needed to complete the required procedures before

the requested suspension is to be effective.

All written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made

available for public inspection in the Dairy Division during regular

business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)).

Statement of Consideration

The proposed rule would continue to suspend certain provisions of

the Central Arizona order for an indefinite period beginning April 1,

1996. The proposed suspension would continue to remove the requirement

that a cooperative association which operates a manufacturing plant in

the marketing area must ship at least 50 percent of its milk supply

during the current month or the previous 12-month period ending with

the current month to other handlers' pool plants to maintain the pool

status of its manufacturing plant.

The order permits a cooperative association's manufacturing plant,

located in the marketing area, to be a pool plant if at least 50

percent of the producer milk of members of the cooperative association

is physically received at pool plants of other handlers during the

current month or the previous 12-month period ending with the current

month.

Continuation of the current suspension was requested by United

Dairymen of Arizona (UDA), a cooperative association that represents

nearly all of the dairy farmers who supply the Central Arizona market.

UDA contends that the continued pool status of their manufacturing

plant is threatened if the suspension is not continued. UDA states that

the same marketing conditions that warranted the

[[Page 10289]]

suspension last year still exist. UDA maintains that members who

increased their milk production to meet the projected demands of fluid

handlers for distribution into Mexico continue to suffer the adverse

impact of the collapse of the Mexican peso. Absent a suspension, UDA

projects that costly and inefficient movements of milk would have to be

made to maintain pool status of producers who have historically

supplied the market and to prevent disorderly marketing in the Central

Arizona marketing area.

Accordingly, it may be appropriate to suspend the aforesaid

provisions beginning April 1, 1996, for an indefinite period.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1131

Milk marketing orders.

The authority citation for 7 CFR Part 1131 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

Dated: March 7, 1996.

Lon Hatamiya,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96-5933 Filed 3-12-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-02-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.