Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Indiana

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[IN72-1a; FRL-5647-9]

Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this action, EPA is approving two redesignation requests

submitted by the State of Indiana. On March 14, 1996, Indiana requested

that a portion of Marion County be redesignated to attainment of the

National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide

(SO2). On June 17, 1996, Indiana requested that portions of

LaPorte and Wayne Counties and all of Vigo County be redesignated to

attainment for SO2. The EPA is also approving the maintenance

plans for Marion, LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties, which were

submitted with the redesignation requests to ensure maintenance of the

NAAQS. Subsequent to this approval, Marion, LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne

Counties are each designated attainment in their entirety.

DATES: The ``direct final'' is effective on January 14, 1997. If the

effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the

Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the revision request are available for inspection

at the following address: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5,

Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604. (It is recommended that you telephone Ryan Bahr at

(312) 353-4366 before visiting the Region 5 Office.)

Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Bahr at (312) 353-4366.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

The NAAQS for SO2 consist of two standards: a primary standard

for the protection of public health and a secondary standard for the

protection of public welfare. The primary SO2 standard consists of

a 24-hour maximum and an annual arithmetic mean ambient SO2

concentration. The secondary standard consists of a 3-hour maximum

ambient SO2 concentration. (See 40 CFR 50.2-50.5)

On March 3, 1978 (43 FR 40412), Marion County was designated

nonattainment for SO2 based on monitored violations of the 24-hour

standard and modeled violations of both the annual and 24-hour

standards (43 FR 8962). Also on March 3, 1978, a portion of LaPorte

County bordered by Lake Michigan, the State of Michigan, Porter County

and Interstate 94 was designated as nonattainment for both the primary

and the secondary SO2 standards, due to measured and modeled

violations of the SO2 NAAQS. On the same date, Vigo County was

designated as nonattainment of the primary SO2 standard because of

monitored violations, and Wayne County was designated nonattainment

because dispersion modeling predicted primary standard violations.

In an October 5, 1978 (43 FR 45993) action, the Marion County

nonattainment designation was revised to attainment of the secondary

SO2 standard, since no 3-hour SO2 violations had been

monitored or predicted. Also on that date, LaPorte County's designation

was revised to nonattainment of the primary standard only. In addition,

the Wayne County nonattainment area was revised to include only Boston,

Center, Franklin, Wayne and Webster Townships, which encompassed the

contributing sources (43 FR 46007).

On September 18, 1990, Lawrence, Washington, and Warren Townships

in Marion County were redesignated from nonattainment to ``Cannot be

classified''

[[Page 58483]]

based on clean ambient data and full source compliance with emission

limitations (55 FR 38327). The rest of Marion County remained

nonattainment for SO2. (Note: At the time of this redesignation,

EPA commonly redesignated areas to ``Cannot be classified,'' rather

than ``attainment,'' due to concerns about the adequacy of monitoring

networks. However, as of November 15, 1990, Section 107 (d)(3)(F) of

the Clean Air Act Amendments prohibited redesignations to

unclassifiable status.)

In order to satisfy the requirements of Part D and Section 110 of

the Clean Air Act (Act) for the four nonattainment areas, Indiana

submitted a SO2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) request to USEPA.

The USEPA approved Indiana's SO2 SIP submission for these areas on

September 1, 1988 (53 FR 33808). There have been no monitored

violations of the SO2 standard in any of the four counties since

1985.

II. Evaluation Criteria

Section 107(d)(3)(D) of the Act, as amended in 1990, authorizes the

Governor of a State to request the redesignation of an area from

nonattainment to attainment. The criteria used to review redesignation

requests are derived from the Act. An area can be redesignated to

attainment if the following conditions are met:

(1) The area has attained the applicable NAAQS;

(2) The area has a fully approved SIP under section 110(k) of the

Act;

(3) The EPA has determined that the improvement in air quality in

the area is due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions;

(4) EPA has determined that the maintenance plan for the area has

met all of the requirements of section 175A of the Act; and

(5) The State has met all requirements applicable to the area under

section 110 and part D of the Act.

III. Summary of State Submittal

The following paragraphs discuss how the State's redesignation

requests for Marion, LaPorte, Vigo and Wayne Counties address the Act's

requirements.

A. Demonstrated Attainment of the NAAQS

As explained in an April 21, 1983, memorandum ``Section 107

Designation Policy Summary'' from the Director of the Office of Air

Quality Planning and Standards, eight consecutive quarters of data

showing SO2 NAAQS attainment are required for redesignation. A

violation of the NAAQS occurs when more than one exceedance of the

SO2 NAAQS is recorded in any year (40 CFR 50.4). Indiana's March

14, 1996, and June 17, 1996, submittals cite ambient monitoring data

showing that Marion, LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties have met the

NAAQS for the years 1991-1993, which were the three most recent

consecutive years with quality-assured monitoring data. Preliminary

monitoring data for the period of 1994 through 1996 indicates that the

NAAQS are still being met. The State is currently in the process of

quality assuring that data. The highest monitored SO2 values of

1991 through 1993 were well below the SO2 standards. There have

been no exceedences of the SO2 NAAQS at any monitor in any of

these counties since 1985, and no additional SO2 exceedences have

been recorded in the Aerometric Information and Retrieval System (AIRS)

database through July 1996.

Dispersion modeling is commonly used to demonstrate attainment of

the SO2 NAAQS. A September 4, 1992, EPA policy memorandum on

``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to

Attainment'' explains that additional dispersion modeling is not

required in support of an SO2 redesignation request if an adequate

modeled attainment demonstration was submitted and approved as part of

the fully implemented SIP, and no indication of an existing air quality

deficiency exists. Modeling was performed in 1987 to show that, under

all allowed operating scenarios, the emission limits in these four

counties' SO2 SIPs would lead to attainment and maintenance of the

SO2 standards. The SIP was approved and implemented on September

1, 1988 (53 FR 33806). Dispersion modeling of the various allowed

operating scenarios and modeling using maximum allowable emissions

showed the NAAQS to be protected in each of these counties (53 FR

6845). Furthermore, there have been no SO2 NAAQS exceedences in

any of these areas since 1985. Therefore, EPA did not require Indiana

to submit additional dispersion modeling with its redesignation request

for Marion, LaPorte, Wayne or Vigo Counties. The State has committed to

reevaluate the SO2 modeling for each county every three years and

perform new modeling as necessary to account for the effect of new

sources or significant emission changes in existing sources.

B. Fully Approved SIP

The SIP for the area must be fully approved under section 110(k) of

the Act and must satisfy all requirements that apply to the area. EPA's

guidance for implementing section 110 of the Act is discussed in the

General Preamble to Title I (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992). The SO2

SIP for Marion, LaPorte, Wayne, and Vigo Counties met the requirements

of Section 110 of the Act and was approved by EPA on September 1, 1988

(53 FR 33806). The SIP supplemented a set of general Statewide SO2

limitations with a set of individual emission limits for specific

sources in the respective counties. The Indiana SO2 SIP included

schedules and timetables for compliance, provided for the operation of

air quality monitors, and included a program to provide for the

enforcement of the emission limits.

C. Permanent and Enforceable Reductions in Emissions

Marion, LaPorte, Wayne, and Vigo Counties' attainment of the

SO2 standards can be attributed to the implementation of the

SO2 SIP controls and other permanent emissions reductions. On

September 1, 1988, EPA approved the control strategies and emissions

limits in Indiana's SO2 SIP for these counties, which rendered

them federally enforceable. The regulations are permanent, and any

future revisions to the rules must be submitted to and approved by the

EPA. Statewide inventories of major SO2 sources as of 1990 were

used to support the redesignation requests.

Indiana reported that since 1990, a number of sources in the four

counties reduced their SO2 emissions, converted to cleaner fuels,

or shut down entirely. The use of lower-sulfur ``cleaner'' fuels is

reflected in the facilities' air permits and federally enforceable SIP

regulations. The facilities which have completely shut down no longer

hold current air emissions permits, and future operations at those

locations would not be allowed to commence without the issuance of a

new air permit by the State under the federally delegated Prevention of

Significant Deterioration program.

D. Fully Approved Maintenance Plan

Under section 107(d)(3)(E) and section 175A of the Act, the State

must submit a maintenance plan in order for an area to be redesignated

to attainment. Section 175A of the Act sets forth the maintenance plan

requirements for areas seeking redesignation from nonattainment to

attainment. The maintenance plan must demonstrate continued attainment

of the applicable NAAQS for at least 10 years after the area is

redesignated. Eight years after the redesignation date, the State is

required to revise its SIP to provide for maintenance of the standard

in the

[[Page 58484]]

affected area for an additional ten-year period. EPA redesignation

policy stated in the September 4, 1992, memorandum lists the five core

provisions that a plan must contain in order to ensure maintenance of

the standards: An attainment inventory, a maintenance demonstration, a

monitoring network, verification of continued attainment, and a

contingency plan. Indiana submitted maintenance plans along with both

its March 14, 1996, redesignation request for Marion County and its

June 17, 1996, redesignation request for LaPorte, Vigo and Wayne

Counties. The following paragraphs discuss Indiana's submittals with

regard to EPA's requirements, and provide the basis for EPA's approval

of the maintenance plans.

1. Attainment Inventory

The State is required to develop an attainment inventory to

identify the level of emissions in the area at the time of

redesignation. Indiana prepared a base year inventory for 1990, and

supplemented it with major source actual emissions data from 1993.

Sources in Indiana must also report their emissions annually to the

State, which will help to verify maintenance of the NAAQS in future

years.

2. Maintenance Demonstration

The State is required to demonstrate maintenance of the NAAQS by

showing that future emissions of a pollutant or its precursors will not

cause a violation of the NAAQS. This demonstration requires the State

to project emissions for the 10-year period following redesignation.

The State projected the SO2 emissions of Marion, LaPorte, Vigo,

and Wayne Counties to the year 2007. Five of Marion County's industries

account for almost 90% of the total SO2 emissions in the county.

One of LaPorte County's industries accounts for more than 95% of the

total SO2 emissions in the county. In Vigo County, one source

accounts for more than 93% of total emissions. Wayne County only has

two major sources, one of which is responsible for about 96% of total

emissions.

Growth projections for the largest facilities were primarily based

on the facilities' plans to comply with the provisions of Title IV of

the Act (Acid Deposition Control). Projections for other major sources

were extrapolated from the United States Department of Commerce Bureau

of Economic Analysis growth factors which are based on statewide

industrial earnings data. A growth factor of 1.5 was used for most

smaller sources, except those which had switched to natural gas or

could otherwise justify a different factor. In LaPorte and Vigo

Counties, the emissions calculated with growth factors from the actual

emissions in 1990 are predicted to drop significantly. The emissions

are predicted to rise in Wayne County but remain below the maximum

allowable emissions which were modeled for and which were shown to be

protective of the NAAQS.

SO2 emissions are projected to increase in Marion County by

2007. However, they are still expected to remain well below the

emission totals for 1985, when the last SO2 exceedance was

monitored. In LaPorte and Vigo Counties, the emissions are predicted to

drop significantly. The emissions are predicted to rise in Wayne County

but remain below the maximum emissions which were modeled for and which

were shown to be protective of the NAAQS.

3. Ambient Monitoring

In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, after an area has been

redesignated to attainment, the State must continue to operate an

appropriate air quality network to verify the attainment status of the

area. There are nine monitoring sites in Marion County. Three are

operated by a utility company, and the rest are State and Local Air

Monitoring Sites (SLAMS). There are two industry operated monitoring

sites in LaPorte County, both of which are located in Michigan City and

operated by the Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO). There

are also two monitors in Vigo County. The Indiana Department of

Environmental Management operates one as a SLAMS and Public Service of

Indiana (PSI) Energy operates the other. In Wayne County there are two

monitors operated by Richmond Power and Light. Indiana has committed to

continue monitoring SO2 at the current SLAMS in Vigo and Marion

Counties and will discuss any future changes in the monitoring network

with the EPA. All data, including that from industry, will be quality

assured by the State according to the requirements of 40 CFR 58. The

monitoring data will be entered in the AIRS system on a timely basis.

4. Verification of Continued Attainment

Each State should ensure that it has the legal authority to

implement and enforce all measures necessary to attain and to maintain

the NAAQS. Subject to an existing State rule (326 IAC 2-6), the Marion,

LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties facilities will be required to submit

annual statements of their point-source (e.g. stack) emissions. The

State has committed to reevaluate the SO2 modeling every three

years, performing further modeling as necessary to verify that the

SO2 emission limits continue to provide for maintenance of the

SO2 standards. The State does not currently have plans to relax

any of the current Marion, LaPorte, Vigo or Wayne County emission

limits in its SO2 SIP. Any future changes to the State's SO2

limits will be submitted to EPA as a SIP revision, supported by

dispersion modeling showing that the NAAQS will not be violated.

5. Contingency Plan

Section 175A of the Act requires that a maintenance plan includes

contingency provisions as necessary to promptly correct any violation

of the NAAQS that occurs after redesignation of the area. The

contingency plan is considered to be an enforceable part of the SIP and

should ensure that the contingency measures are implemented expediently

once they are triggered. Most of the SO2 emissions in these

counties come from large utilities and other point sources. The

emissions from these sources are tracked on a short-term basis under

State regulations and on a long-term basis via the facilities' Title IV

compliance plans. The State intends to use this information to identify

compliance lapses and initiate enforcement activities.

Indiana has the authority and resources necessary to enforce

against emission limit violations. The State will continue to pursue

enforcement actions aggressively to ensure full compliance with the

SO2 SIP limits. As necessary, the State will seek to place

stricter emission controls on facilities found to have triggered

contingency actions. Such measures would be adopted in accordance with

the State's normal rulemaking procedures and submitted to EPA as SIP

revisions. Indiana has committed to begin implementing its contingency

plan when the second high monitored SO2 values exceed 90 percent

of the 3-hour or 24-hour NAAQS. And, if a violation occurs, the State

will conduct a detailed evaluation to determine the cause of the

violation and then institute measures to remedy the situation.

The attainment inventories, maintenance demonstrations, monitoring

data, attainment verifications and contingency plans submitted for

Marion, LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties constitute sound maintenance

plans and satisfy EPA's requirements.

[[Page 58485]]

E. Part D and Other Section 110 Requirements

EPA approved the SO2 SIP for Marion, LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne

Counties on September 1, 1988, after having concluded that the plan

satisfied the requirements of part D and Section 110 of the Act.

Several of the Section 110 requirements were revised in the 1990

amendments to the Act. However, the existing SIP also conforms with the

new provisions of the Act. The plan provides for the implementation of

reasonably available control measures for SO2 under Indiana's SIP

rule 326 IAC 7-4-2. As required by Part D of the Act, Indiana has a

fully approved and implemented New Source Review. The existing

Prevention of Significant Deterioration program, which was federally

delegated for all attainment areas, will apply in all of Marion,

LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties subsequent to this approval.

1. Section 176 Conformity Requirements

Section 176 of the Act requires States to revise their SIPs to

establish criteria and procedures to ensure that individual Federal

actions will conform to the overall air quality planning goals in the

applicable State SIP. Section 176 further provides that the State's

conformity revisions must be consistent with the Federal conformity

regulations promulgated by EPA under the Act. The requirement used by

Federal agencies to determine conformity is defined in 40 CFR Part 93

Subpart B (``general conformity'').

Indiana has committed to adopt general conformity rules for

SO2 in Marion, LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties to satisfy

provisions of Part D. The State rulemaking process is now under way.

The conformity regulations that apply to transportation plans and

projects, ``transportation conformity'', does not apply to SO2 SIP

actions.

The EPA believes it is reasonable to interpret the conformity

requirements as not being applicable requirements for purposes of

evaluating redesignation requests under section 107(d). The rationale

for this is based on a combination of two factors. First, the

requirement to submit SIP revisions to comply with the conformity

provisions of the Act continues to apply to areas after redesignation

to attainment, since such areas would be subject to a section 175A

maintenance plan. Second, EPA's Federal conformity rules require the

performance of conformity analyses in the absence of federally approved

State rules. Therefore, because areas are subject to the conformity

requirements regardless of whether they are redesignated to attainment,

and must implement conformity under Federal rules if State rules are

not yet approved, the EPA believes it is reasonable to view these

requirements as not being applicable requirements for purposes of

evaluation of a redesignation request. Consequently, the SO2

redesignation requests for Marion, LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties

may be approved notwithstanding the lack of fully approved general

conformity rules. Refer to EPA's action in the Tampa, Florida ozone

redesignation finalized on December 7, 1995 (60 FR 627428).

IV. Final Rulemaking Action

EPA is approving two redesignation requests from the State of

Indiana which were submitted on March 14, 1996, and June 17, 1996. EPA

therefore is redesignating Lawrence, Washington, and Warren Townships,

along with the remainder of Marion County to attainment for SO2,

and is redesignating LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties in their

entirety to attainment for SO2. The EPA is also approving the

SO2 maintenance plans for Marion, LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne

Counties, which were submitted with the redesignation requests, to

ensure that attainment will be maintained. The EPA has completed

analysis of these SIP revision requests based on a review of the

materials presented, and has determined that they are approvable.

The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because

the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates

no adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal

Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision

should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be

effective January 14, 1997 unless, by December 16, 1996, adverse or

critical comments are received. Note that an adverse comment for only

one county will not affect the approval action for the remainder of the

counties.

If the EPA receives such comments, the actions affecting the county

commented upon will be withdrawn before the effective date by

publishing a subsequent notice that will withdraw the parts of the

final action applicable to the county commented upon. All public

comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on

applicable parts of this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties

interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. If

no such comments are received, the public is advised that this action

will be effective January 14, 1997.

Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or

allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for

revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to

the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light

of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in

relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.

V. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature

by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the

Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a

July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary D. Nichols, Assistant Administrator

for Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has

exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq, EPA must

prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of any

proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.

Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a

significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small

entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,

and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than

50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the

Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve

requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the

Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the

Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on

any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the

Federal-State relationship under the Act, preparation of a flexibility

analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base

its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S.

EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a)(2).

Redesignation of an area to attainment under section 107(d)(3)(E)

of the Act does not impose any new requirements on small entities.

Redesignation is an action that affects the status of a

[[Page 58486]]

geographical area and does not impose any regulatory requirements on

sources. The Administrator certifies that the approval of the

redesignation request will not affect a substantial number of small

entities.

C. Unfunded Mandates

Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995,

signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must undertake various actions

in association with any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal

mandate that may result in estimated costs to state, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate; or to the private sector, of $100 million

or more. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under

state or local law, and imposes no new Federal requirements.

Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local, or tribal

governments, or the private sector, result from this action.

D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office

Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report

containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives and the Controller General of the

General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's

Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by

U.S.C. section 804(2).

E. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for

judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court

of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 14, 1997. Filing a

petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule

does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such

rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings

to enforce is requirements.

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental

relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide.

40 CFR Part 81

Air pollution control.

Dated: October 10, 1996.

David A. Ullrich,

Acting Regional Administrator.

For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, title

40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

2. Section 52.795 is amended by adding paragraphs (f) and (g) to

read as follows:

Sec. 52.795 Control strategy: Sulfur dioxide.

* * * * *

(f) Approval--On March 14, 1996, the State of Indiana submitted a

maintenance plan for Lawrence, Washington, and Warren Townships in

Marion County and the remainder of the county, and requested that it be

redesignated to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard

for sulfur dioxide. The redesignation request and maintenance plan

satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.

(g) Approval--On June 17, 1996, the State of Indiana submitted a

maintenance plan for LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties and requested

redesignation to attainment for the National Ambient Air Quality

Standard for sulphur dioxide for each county in its entirety. The

redesignation requests and maintenance plans satisfy all applicable

requirements of the Clean Air Act.

PART 81--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

2. In Sec. 81.315 in the table entitled ``Indiana-SO2 the

existing entries for Marion County are removed, a new entry for Marion

County is added and the entries for LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties

are revised to read as follows:

Sec. 81.315 Indiana.

* * * * *

Indiana SO2

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Does not meet Does not meet Better than

Designated area primary secondary Cannot be national

standards standards classified standards

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *

LaPorte County................................. .............. .............. .............. X

Marion County.................................. .............. .............. .............. X

* * * * * * *

Vigo County.................................... .............. .............. .............. X

* * * * * * *

Wayne County................................... .............. .............. .............. X

* * * * * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 58487]]

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 96-28872 Filed 11-14-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P