Ohio Regulatory Program
Federal RegisterOct 18, 1996
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 935
[OH-240-FOR, #74]
Ohio Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSM is announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Ohio
regulatory program (hereinafter referred to as the ``Ohio program'')
under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA).
The proposed amendment consists of revisions to section 1501:13-6-03 of
the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) dealing with the Small Operator
Assistance Program (SOAP). The amendment is intended to revise the Ohio
program to be consistent with the corresponding Federal regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., [E.D.T.]
November 18, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests to speak at the hearing should
be mailed or hand delivered to George
[[Page 54374]]
Rieger, Field Branch Chief, at the address listed below.
Copies of the Ohio program, the proposed amendment, a listing of
any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments received in
response to this document will be available for public review at the
addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday through
Friday, excluding holidays. Each requester may receive one free copy of
the proposed amendment by contacting OSM's Appalachian Regional
Coordinating Center.
George Rieger, Field Branch Chief, Appalachian Regional Coordinating
Center, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 3 Parkway
Center, Pittsburgh PA 15220, Telephone: (412) 937-2153
Ohio Division of Mines and Reclamation, 1855 Fountain Square Court,
Columbus, Ohio 43244, Telephone: (614) 265-1076.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Rieger, Field Branch Chief, Appalachian Regional Coordinating
Center, Telephone: (412) 937-2153.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Ohio Program
On August 16, 1982, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally
approved the Ohio program. Background information on the Ohio program,
including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and
the conditions of approval can be found in the August 10, 1982, Federal
Register (47 CFR 34688). Subsequent actions concerning conditions of
approval and program amendments can be fount at 30 CFR 935.11, 935.15,
and 935.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated October 3, 1996, (Administrative Record No. OH-
2170-00) Ohio submitted proposed amendments to the Ohio program
concerning the SOAP. Ohio submitted the proposed amendments at its own
initiative. The amendment proposes numerous changes regarding both the
title of the division and gender. Throughout the amendment, references
to the ``division of reclamation'' are changed to the `'division of
mines and reclamation'' and references to ``he'' or ``his'' are changed
to ``he or she'' or ``his or hers'', respectively. These changes are
not specifically enumerated below. The substantive changes proposed by
Ohio in the revised amendment are discussed briefly below:
1. OAC 1501:13-6-03 Small Operator Assistance Program
(a) Paragraph (A)(1) is amended by adding items for which qualified
operators may request assistance. These include engineering analysis
and designs necessary for the determination of probable hydrologic
consequences added to subparagraph (A)(1)(a), and amending subparagraph
(A)(1)(b) to include geologic drilling and statement of the results of
physical and chemical analyses of test borings or core samples.
(b) New subparagraphs (C) (D) (E) and (F) are added to identify the
development of cross-section maps and plans; the collection of
archaeological information and other historical information and the
preparation of plans necessitated thereby; pre-blast surveys; and the
collection of site specific resource information and production of
protection and enhancement plans for fish and wildlife habitats and
other environmental values required by the chief, respectively, as
items for which a qualified operator may request assistance.
(c) Paragraph (B) is amended by deleting subparagraphs (1) and (2)
dealing with probable hydrologic consequences and results of test
borings and core samplings which are added to Paragraph (A) of this
amendment, and adding a statement referencing the services eligible are
under paragraph (A).
(d) Paragraph (C)(2) is further amended by substituting the
Department of Natural Resources as an additional reference for
production figure verification instead of the division of mines and the
division of reclamation. Subparagraphs (C)(2)(a) and (C)(2)(b) are
amended by changing the applicant ownership limit from ``more than a
five percent limit'' to ``ten percent or more'' limit.
(e) New subparagraph (D)(9) is added to require that an applicant
for assistance shall also submit a general statement on the probable
depth and thickness of the coal resource including a statement of
reserves in the permit area and the method by which they were
calculated. Subsequent subparagraphs are re-lettered accordingly.
(f) Subparagraph (D)(10) is amended by deleting the specific map
scale references required for a topographic map and adding a reference
to Rule 1501:13-9-04 of the OAC. New subparagraph (D)(10)(E) is added
to require that such topographic maps also include any additional
information required by the chief.
(g) Paragraph (F)(2) is amended by deleting the heading ``specific
provisions'' and adding the following: ``The data, analyses, and
statements provided to the chief shall be sufficient to satisfy the
requirements for:''. Subparagraphs (F)(2) (a) and (b) are amended to
include engineering analyses and designs necessary for the probable
hydrologic consequences determination, and the drilling and statement
by a qualified laboratory of the result of test borings or core
samplings, respectively. Subparagraph (F)(2)(b) is further amended by
adding provisions for obtaining a waiver from the requirement.
Subparagraph (F)(2)(c) pertaining to this waiver is deleted.
Existing subparagraph (F)(2)(d) is re-numbered as (F)(3), and
existing subparagraphs (F)(2) (e) and (f) are deleted.
New subparagraphs (F)(2) (C), (D), (E), and (F) are added to
identify the specific requirements that must be met for the development
of cross-section maps and plans; the collection of archeological
information and other historical information; pre-blast surveys; and
the collection of site-specific resource information and production of
protection and enhancement plans for fish and wildlife habitats and
other environmental values, respectively.
III. Public Comment Procedures
In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is
seeking comments on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the
applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If the amendment
is deemed adequate, it will become part of the Ohio program.
Written Comments
Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the
commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated
under DATES or at locations other than the Appalachian Regional
Coordinating Center will not necessarily be considered in the final
rulemaking or included in the Administrative Record.
Public Hearing
Persons wishing to speak at the public hearing should contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m.,
[E.D.T.] on November 4, 1996. The location and time of the hearing will
be arranged with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one
requests an opportunity to speak at the public hearing, the hearing
will not be held.
[[Page 54375]]
Filing of a written statement at the time of the hearing is
requested as it will greatly assist the transcriber. Submission of
written statements in advance of the hearing will allow OSM officials
to prepare adequate responses and appropriate questions.
The public hearing will continue on the specified date until all
persons scheduled to speak have been heard. Persons in the audience who
have not been scheduled to speak, and who wish to do so, will be heard
following those who have been scheduled. The hearing will end after all
persons scheduled to speak and persons present in the audience who wish
to speak have been heard.
Any disabled individual who has need for a special accommodation to
attend a public hearing should contact the individual listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak at a hearing, a
public meeting, rather than a public hearing, may be held. Persons
wishing to meet with OSM representatives to discuss the proposed
amendment may request a meeting by contacting the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings will be open to the
public and, if possible, notices of meetings will be posted at the
locations listed under ADDRESSES. A written summary of each meeting
will be made a part of the Administrative Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 2 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has
determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section.
However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of
State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such
program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM.
Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30
CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State
regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must
be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is
consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and
whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
National Environmental Policy Act
No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since
section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements
previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In
making the determination as to whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any
given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 935
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: October 10, 1996.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 96-26776 Filed 10-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.