Compensated Intercorporate Hauling

Federal RegisterOct 21, 1996

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SUMMARY: This document proposes to remove the regulation that

delineates the scope and notice filing requirements of the statutory

exemption for compensated intercorporate hauling. Section 103 of the

ICC Termination Act of 1995 removed the requirement that a notice be

filed before initiation of compensated intercorporate hauling

operations. Removal of the regulation would reflect the statutory

change and is consistent with the overall intent of the ICC Termination

Act of 1995 to eliminate unnecessary regulation.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 20,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Submit signed, written comments to FHWA Docket No. MC-96-37,

FHWA, Office of the Chief Counsel, HCC-10, Room 4232, 400 Seventh

Street SW., Washington, DC 20590. All comment received will be

available for examination at the above address from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30

p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those

desiring notification of receipt of comments must include a self-

addressed, stamped postcard/envelope.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Thomas T. Vining or Ms. Patricia

A. Burke, Office of Motor Carrier Information Analysis, HIA-30, (202)

927-5520, or Ms. Grace Reidy, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-

0834, Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.,

e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The former Interstate Commerce Act contained

an exemption from ICC regulation at 49 U.S.C. 10524(b) for compensated

transportation service by a member of a corporate family, for other

members of the same family, if proper notice was given. To qualify for

the exemption, the participants were required to be members of a

corporate family in which the parent owned, either directly or

indirectly, a 100 percent interest in the subsidiaries. Corporate

entities availing themselves of the exemption were also required to

file a notice, which was published in the Federal Register, listing the

participating subsidiaries and certifying 100 percent ownership by the

corporate parent.

The ICC Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA), Public Law 104-88, 109

Stat. 803, reenacted the substantive exemption for compensated

intercorporate hauling, but removed the requirement for filing of a

notice of operations under the exemption, 49 U.S.C. 13505(b). Although

the ICCTA does not prohibit imposition of a notice requirement by the

FHWA, which has assumed responsibility for these regulations pursuant

to the ICCTA, the continuing need for such a requirement, or for any

regulations on this subject, is doubtful.

The provisions of 49 CFR Part 369 merely restate the scope of the

exemption as set out in the statute. Sections 369.22 and 369.23 cover

the form and content of the notice and when an updated notice must be

filed. These regulations appear to serve little purpose. In particular,

the information contained in the notice can be easily checked by the

FHWA if it ever appears that a corporation is conducting operations

which exceed the scope of the exemption. Because the ICCTA essentially

limits licensing requirements to compliance with safety and insurance

requirements, there also appears to be no incentive for a corporation

to use the exemption as a cover for unlicensed transportation

operations. The corporation could easily obtain operating authority for

legitimate operations. Thus, the regulations at 49 CFR 369 no longer

have any meaningful regulatory requirements and the FHWA proposes to

remove them. The FHWA invites comments on this proposal.

Rulemaking Analyses and Notices

All comments received before the close of business on the comment

closing date indicated above will be considered and will be available

for examination in the docket at the above address. Comments received

after the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and will be

considered to the extent practicable, but the FHWA may issue a final

rule at any time after the close of the comment period. In addition to

late comments, the FHWA will also continue to file in the docket

relevant information that becomes available after the comment closing

date, and interested persons should continue to examine the docket for

new material.

Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures

The FHWA has determined that this action is not a significant

regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 or

significant within the meaning of Department of Transportation

regulatory policies and procedures. It is anticipated that the economic

impact of this rulemaking will be minimal; therefore, a full regulatory

evaluation is not required. The rulemaking merely proposes to eliminate

a notice filing requirement which applies to a small number of

transportation entities. Neither the individual nor cumulative impact

of this action will be significant.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354,

5 U.S.C. 601-612), the FHWA has evaluated the effects of this rule on

small entities. Based on the evaluation, the FHWA hereby certifies that

this action will not have a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities. The filing requirement currently

only involves the preparation of a relatively simple notice by less

than twenty transportation entities annually. Its elimination, while

beneficial, will not have a significant economic impact.

Executive Order 12612 (Federalism Assessment)

This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and

criteria contained in Executive Order 12612, and it has been determined

that this action does not have sufficient federalism implications to

warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment.

Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.217, Motor

Carrier Safety. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372

regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and

activities do not apply to this program.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This action does not contain a collection of information

requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq. It does eliminate a requirement that parties taking

advantage of the exemption at 49 U.S.C. 13505(b) prepare and file a

notice of their operations. This action is thus consistent with goals

of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

[[Page 54712]]

National Environmental Policy Act

The agency has analyzed this action for the purpose of the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and has

determined that this action would not have any effect on the quality of

the environment.

Regulation Identification Number

A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each

regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.

The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda

in April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the

heading of this document can be used to cross reference this action

with the Unified Agenda.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR 369

Highways and roads.

Issued on: September 30, 1996.

Rodney E. Slater,

Federal Highway Administrator.

In consideration of the foregoing and under the authority of

section 103 of the ICC Termination Act of 1995, Public Law 104-88, 109

Stat. 803, and 49 CFR 1.48, the FHWA proposes to amend title 49, CFR,

chapter III, by removing Part 369.

[FR Doc. 96-26668 Filed 10-18-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.