Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Evaluation of NIH Implementation of Section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, Mandating a Program of Protection for Research Subjects
Federal RegisterOct 10, 1996
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Evaluation of NIH
Implementation of Section 491 of the Public Health Service Act,
Mandating a Program of Protection for Research Subjects
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public comment
on proposed data collection projects, the National Institutes of Health
(NIH), Office of the Director, will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects to be submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
PROPOSED COLLECTION: Title: Evaluation of NIH Implementation of Section
491 of the Public Health Service Act, Mandating a Program of Protection
for Research Subjects. Type of Information Collection: EXTENSION of OMB
No. 0925-0404, expiration 12/31/96. Need and use of Information
Collection: This study will assess the performance of the system of
human subjects protections. It will provide up-to-date comprehensive
and systematic information on the effectiveness and efficiency of
procedural protections by measuring outcome, output, process, and
resources of the current system to develop possible recommendations.
The study will use survey, interview, and record extraction
methodologies. Development of the survey instruments and methodology
has involved representatives of the affected public over the past 2
years. Frequency of Response: One time response. Affected Public:
Individuals or households; Not-for Profit Institutions; State, Local,
or Tribal Government. Type of Respondents: University officials, staff,
and faculty. The annual reporting burden is as follows: Estimated
Number of Respondents: 2,358; Number of Responses per Respondent: 1;
Average Burden per Response: 0.513 hr.; and Estimated Total Annual
Burden Hours Requested: 1,210. The annualized cost to respondents is
$57,605. There are no
[[Page 53229]]
Capital Costs to report. There are no Operating or Maintenance Costs to
report.
REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS: Written comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies are invited on one or more of the
following points: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on those who are to
respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: To request more information on the proposed
project or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and
instruments, contact Dr. Charles R. MacKay, Project Clearance Officer,
Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, Office of
Extramural Research, Office of the Director, NIH, Rockledge 2, 6701
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7730, Room 2196, Bethesda, MD 20892-7730, or call
nontoll-free number (301) 435-0978 or E-mail your request, including
your address to: [email protected].
COMMENTS DUE DATE: Comments regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if received on or before
December 9, 1996.
Dated: October 3, 1996.
Geoffrey E. Grant,
Acting Deputy Director for Extramural Research, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-25978 Filed 10-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.