Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan for North Dakota; Revisions to the Air Pollution Control Rules; Delegation of Authority for Colorado Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources

SUMMARY: EPA approves the State implementation plan (SIP) revisions

submitted by the State of North Dakota with a letter dated December 21,

1994. The submittal addressed revisions to SIP Chapter 2, regarding

delegatable authorities and asbestos law revisions, and revisions to

air pollution control rules, regarding general provisions; ambient air

quality standards; new source performance standards (NSPS); and

national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPs). The

submittal also addressed the following issues which were reviewed

separately: Revisions to the Title V permit to operate program;

revisions to the Acid Rain program; and emission standards for

hazardous air pollutants for source categories (MACT standards).

In addition, EPA is providing notice that it granted delegation of

authority to Colorado on February 15, 1996 to implement and enforce

several NSPS adopted by the State.

DATES: This final rule is effective on December 9, 1996 unless comments

are received in writing on or before November 7, 1996. If the effective

date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal

Register. The Delegation of Authority for the State of Colorado became

effective on February 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the State's submittal and other information are

available for inspection during normal business hours at the following

locations: Air Program, Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII,

999 18th Street, suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2405; North Dakota

State Department of Health and Consolidated Laboratories, Environmental

Health Section, 1200 Missouri Avenue, Bismarck, North Dakota, 58502-

5520; and The Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, 401 M

Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Platt, Environmental Protection

Agency, Region VIII, (303) 312-6449.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Analysis of North Dakota's Submission

The State submitted various revisions to its air pollution control

rules with a letter to EPA dated December 21, 1994. These revisions

were necessary to make the rules consistent with Federal requirements.

A. Procedural Background

The Act requires States to observe certain procedural requirements

in developing implementation plans and plan revisions for submission to

EPA. Section 110(a)(2) of the Act provides that each implementation

plan submitted by a State must be adopted after reasonable notice and

public hearing. Section 110(l) of the Act similarly provides that each

revision to an implementation plan submitted by a State under the Act

must be adopted by such State after reasonable notice and public

hearing.

EPA also must determine whether a submittal is complete and

therefore warrants further EPA review and action [see section 110(k)(1)

and 57 FR 13565]. EPA's completeness criteria for SIP submittals are

set out at 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. EPA attempts to make

completeness determinations within 60 days of receiving a submission.

However, a submittal is deemed complete by operation of law if a

completeness determination is not made by EPA six months after receipt

of the submission.

To entertain public comment, the State of North Dakota, after

providing adequate notice, held public hearings on May 24, and May 25,

1994 to address the respective revisions to the SIP and Air Pollution

Control Rules. Following the public hearings, the North Dakota State

Health Council adopted the respective rule revisions.

The Governor of North Dakota submitted revisions to the SIP with a

letter dated December 21, 1994. The SIP revisions were reviewed by EPA

to determine completeness in accordance with the completeness criteria

set out at 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The submittal was found to be

complete and a letter dated February 13, 1995 was forwarded to the

Governor indicating the completeness of the submittal and the next

steps to be taken in the review process.

B. December 21, 1994 Revisions

The December 21, 1994 submittal addressed revisions to Chapter 2 of

the SIP, regarding delegatable authorities and asbestos law revisions,

and the following chapters of the North Dakota Air Pollution Control

Rules: 33-15-01 General Provisions; 33-15-02 Ambient Air Quality

Standards; 33-15-12 Standards of Performance for New Stationary

Sources; and 33-15-13 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.

The December 21, 1994 submittal also addressed North Dakota Air

Pollution Control Rules involving the Title V permit to operate

program, the Acid Rain program, and emission standards for hazardous

air pollutants for source categories (MACT standards). However, in a

February 2, 1995 letter from Dana Mount, North Dakota Division of

Environmental Engineering, to Douglas Skie, EPA, the State indicated

that these programs were not intended to be reviewed through the SIP

process. Accordingly, EPA reviewed these revisions separately from the

rule revisions being considered in this document.

1. Asbestos Law Revisions

The 1993 North Dakota State Legislature made several revisions to

the North Dakota Century Code provisions pertaining to asbestos

regulation. These revisions were made to update the law to be

consistent with the Federal Clean Air Act. Clarifications were made to

the definition of ``asbestos worker'' and to the asbestos worker

licensing and certification requirements. In addition, a new subsection

was added to address requirements that the Department provide any

procedural rules necessary to develop, implement, and enforce air

pollution control programs, the authority and responsibility for which

have been delegated to the State by EPA. These revisions are consistent

with Federal requirements and, therefore, are approvable.

2. North Dakota Air Pollution Control Rules, Chapter 33-15-01 General

Provisions

Revisions were made to section 33-15-01-17, Enforcement, and a new

section 33-15-01-18, Compliance Certifications, was added. The change

to section 33-15-01-17 allows the North Dakota State Department of

Health and Consolidated Laboratories (``the Department'') to use

monitoring data as credible evidence that noncompliance of a source

exits. Section 33-15-01-18 allows the source to use monitoring data to

certify that the source is in compliance with the applicable emission

limits. These revisions are consistent with Federal requirements and,

therefore, are approvable.

[[Page 52866]]

These revisions also address EPA's nationwide SIP call regarding

the new enhanced monitoring and compliance certification requirements

of the amended Act. On October 22, 1993, EPA announced in the Federal

Register that SIP calls pursuant to section 110(k)(5) of the Act would

be issued in order to implement the enhanced monitoring requirements of

section 114(a)(3) of the Act and the periodic monitoring requirements

for operating permits under sections 502(b)(2) and 504 of the Act (see

58 FR 54677). This SIP call was required because existing SIPs could

have been interpreted to limit the types of testing or monitoring data

to be used for determining compliance and establishing violations.

EPA believes that the State has adequately satisfied the

requirements of the SIP call. The revision to section 33-15-01-17

provides that information from monitoring methods approved in a

federally enforceable operating permit or in the SIP, as well as from

any other federally enforceable monitoring and testing methods

(including those in 40 CFR Parts 50, 51, 60, 61, and 75), may be used

by the State as credible evidence to determine compliance. By allowing

compliance certifications to be made with approved enhanced monitoring

protocols or other approved monitoring methods, the new section 33-15-

01-18 has the practical effect of making the SIP more flexible and

inclusive since it does not preclude the use of enhanced monitoring.

Therefore, EPA is approving these revisions to Chapter 33-15-01

regarding enhanced monitoring and compliance certifications.

3. Chapter 33-15-02 Ambient Air Quality Standards

Revisions to this chapter consist of deleting the one-hour ambient

air quality standard for nitrogen dioxide. The State received a request

for this revision from the North Dakota Lignite Council. The State

indicated that the standard was originally written in terms that

allowed exceedances one percent of the time in any three-month period,

which proved to be a very cumbersome standard to track and required

extensive time by staff to perform dispersion modelling to ensure

compliance. The State opted to delete the one-hour standard and retain

the Federal annual standard of 100 g/m3, in response to

the need to develop a more manageable standard, the request by industry

that the one-hour standard be deleted, and EPA's 1993 findings that no

changes in the Federal standard were contemplated. This revision is

consistent with Federal requirements and, therefore, is approvable.

4. Chapter 33-15-12, Standards of Performance for New Stationary

Sources; Chapter 33-15-13, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants

The revisions to Chapters 33-15-12 and 33-15-13 incorporate by

reference the Federal NSPS in 40 CFR part 60 and the Federal NESHAPs in

40 CFR part 61, as in effect on May 1, 1994, with the exception of 40

CFR part 61, subparts B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W (i.e., radionuclides).

The revisions to Chapter 33-15-12 include the addition, by reference,

of Subpart RRR--Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Compound

Emissions by Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI)

Reactor Processes. EPA reviewed the State's revised NSPS and NESHAPs

regulations and determined that they are consistent with the Federal

regulations and, therefore, are approvable.

II. Notice of Delegation of Authority to Colorado

On November 17, 1995, the State of Colorado submitted revisions to

its NSPS regulations in Part A of Colorado Regulation No. 6. The

submittal included the addition of the Federal NSPS in 40 CFR part 60,

subparts Dc, Ea, Kb, AAa, BBB, DDD, NNN, QQQ, RRR, SSS, TTT, UUU, and

VVV. Pursuant to such submittal, on February 15, 1996, delegation was

given with the following letter:

Honorable Roy Romer, Governor of Colorado, 136 State Capitol,

Denver, Colorado 80203-1792.

Dear Governor Romer: On November 17, 1995, you requested delegation

of authority for revisions to the New Source Performance Standards

(NSPS) in Part A of Colorado's Regulation No. 6. These revisions

brought the State's NSPS up to date with the Federal NSPS in effect

as of October 11, 1994, with the exception of Subparts AAA (new

residential wood heaters) and III (volatile organic compound

emissions from the synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry

air oxidation unit processes) which the State has not adopted.

Subsequent to states adopting NSPS regulations, the EPA

delegates the authority for the implementation and enforcement of

those NSPS, so long as the State's regulations are equivalent to the

Federal regulations. EPA, therefore, is acting on the delegation of

authority to Colorado for implementation and enforcement of thirteen

NSPS.

EPA has reviewed the pertinent statutes and regulations of the

State of Colorado and has determined that they provide an adequate

and effective procedure for the implementation and enforcement of

the NSPS, including the source applicability dates, by the State of

Colorado. Therefore, pursuant to Section 111(c) of the Clean Air Act

(Act), as amended, and 40 CFR Part 60, EPA hereby delegates its

authority for the implementation and enforcement of the NSPS to the

State of Colorado as follows:

(A) Responsibility for all sources located, or to be located, in

the State of Colorado subject to the standards of performance for

new stationary sources promulgated in 40 CFR Part 60. The categories

of new stationary sources covered by this delegation are as follows:

small industrial-commercial-institutional steam generating units

(Subpart Dc), municipal waste combustors (Subpart Ea), volatile

organic liquid storage vessels (including petroleum liquid storage

vessels) for which construction, reconstruction, or modification

commenced after July 23, 1984 (Subpart Kb), steel plants: electric

arc furnaces and argon-oxygen decarburization vessels constructed

after August 7, 1983 (Subpart AAa), rubber tire manufacturing

industry (Subpart BBB), volatile organic compound emissions from the

polymer manufacturing industry (Subpart DDD), volatile organic

compound emissions from synthetic organic chemical manufacturing

industry distillation operations (Subpart NNN), volatile organic

compound emissions from petroleum refinery wastewater systems

(Subpart QQQ), volatile organic compound emissions from synthetic

organic chemical manufacturing industry reactor processes (Subpart

RRR), magnetic tape coating facilities (Subpart SSS), industrial

surface coating: surface coating of plastic parts for business

machines (Subpart TTT), calciners and dryers in mineral industries

(Subpart UUU), and polymeric coating of supporting substrates

facilities (Subpart VVV).

(B) Not all authorities of NSPS can be delegated to states under

Section 111(c) of the Act, as amended. The EPA Administrator retains

authority to implement those sections of the NSPS that require: (1)

approving equivalency determinations and alternative test methods,

(2) decision making to ensure national consistency, and (3) EPA

rulemaking to implement. Therefore, of the NSPS of 40 CFR Part 60

being delegated in this letter, the following sections are not

delegated to the State of Colorado:

(i) 40 CFR 60.48c(a)(4), pertaining to small industrial-

commercial-institutional steam generating units (Subpart Dc);

(ii) 40 CFR 60.111b(f)(4), 60.114b, 60.116b(e)(3)(iii),

60.116b(e)(3)(iv), and 60.116b(f)(2)(iii), pertaining to volatile

organic liquid storage vessels (including petroleum liquid storage

vessels) for which construction, reconstruction, or modification

commenced after July 23, 1984, (Subpart Kb);

(iii) 40 CFR 60.543(c)(2)(ii)(B), pertaining to the rubber tire

manufacturing industry (Subpart BBB);

(iv) 40 CFR 60.562-2(c), pertaining to volatile organic compound

emissions from the polymer manufacturing industry (Subpart DDD);

(v) 40 CFR 60.663(e), pertaining to volatile organic compound

emissions from synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry

distillation operations (Subpart NNN);

(vi) 40 CFR 60.694, pertaining to volatile organic compound

emissions from petroleum refinery wastewater systems (Subpart QQQ);

(vii) 40 CFR 60.703(e), pertaining to volatile organic compound

emissions from

[[Page 52867]]

synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry reactor processes

(Subpart RRR);

(viii) 40 CFR 60.711(a)(16), 60.713(b)(1)(i), 60.713(b)(1)(ii),

60.713(b)(5)(i), 60.713(d), 60.715(a), and 60.716, pertaining to

magnetic tape coating facilities (Subpart SSS);

(ix) 40 CFR 60.723(b)(1), 60.723(b)(2)(i)(C), 60.723(b)(2)(iv),

60.724(e), and 60.725(b), pertaining to industrial surface coating

of plastic parts for business machines (Subpart TTT); and

(x) 40 CFR 60.743(a)(3)(v) (A) and (B), 60.743(e), 60.745(a),

and 60.746, pertaining to polymeric coating of supporting substrates

facilities (Subpart VVV).

(C) As 40 CFR Part 60 is updated, Colorado should revise its

regulations accordingly and in a timely manner.

This delegation is based upon and is a continuation of the same

conditions as those stated in EPA's original delegation letter of

August 27, 1975, except that condition 3, relating to Federal

facilities, has been voided by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.

It is also important to note that EPA retains concurrent enforcement

authority as stated in condition 2. In addition, if at any time

there is a conflict between a State and Federal NSPS regulation, the

Federal regulation must be applied if it is more stringent than that

of the State, as stated in condition 10. A copy of this letter was

published in the notices section of the Federal Register on October

31, 1975 (40 FR 50748), along with an associated rulemaking

notifying the public that certain reports and applications required

from operators of new or modified sources shall be submitted to the

State of Colorado (40 FR 50718). Copies of the Federal Register are

enclosed for your convenience.

Since this delegation is effective immediately, there is no need

for the State to notify the EPA of its acceptance. Unless we receive

written notice of objections from you within ten days of the date on

which you receive this letter, the State of Colorado will be deemed

to have accepted all the terms of this delegation. An information

notice will be published in the Federal Register in the near future

informing the public of this delegation, in which this letter will

appear in its entirety.

If you have any questions on this matter, please call me, or

have your staff contact Richard Long, Director of our Air Program,

at 312-6005.

Sincerely,

Patricia Hull,

Acting Regional Administrator.

III. Final Action

EPA is approving North Dakota's SIP revision, as submitted by the

Governor with a letter December 21, 1994. This submittal addressed

revisions to SIP Chapter 2, regarding Delegatable Authorities and

Asbestos Law Revisions, and revisions to the following North Dakota Air

Pollution Control Rules: 33-15-01 General Provisions; 33-15-02 Ambient

Air Quality Standards; 33-15-12 Standards of Performance for New

Stationary Sources; and 33-15-13 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants. This approval provides the State with the authority for

implementation and enforcement of all Federal NSPS and NESHAPs (except

40 CFR part 61, subparts B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W, pertaining to

radionuclides) promulgated as of May 1, 1994. However, the State's NSPS

and NESHAP authorities do not include those authorities which cannot be

delegated to the states, as defined in 40 CFR parts 60 and 61. The

update of the 40 CFR part 60 table of NSPS delegations reflects these

December 1994 North Dakota revisions as well as North Dakota revisions

to the NSPS delegations that were approved in the Federal Register on

August 21, 1995 (60 FR 43396) and South Dakota revisions to the NSPS

delegations that were approved in the Federal Register on September 6,

1995 (60 FR 46225).

The December 21, 1994 submittal also included revisions to chapters

33-15-14, 33-15-21, 33-15-22, regarding the Title V permit to operate

program, Acid Rain program, and MACT standards. These issues were

reviewed separately from this document.

EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal

Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision

should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be

effective December 9, 1996 unless, by November 7, 1996, adverse or

critical comments are received.

If EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn before

the effective date by publishing a subsequent notice that will withdraw

the final action. All public comments received will be addressed in a

subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule.

EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any

parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this

time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this

action will be effective on December 9, 1996.

Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or

allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for

revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to a SIP shall be

considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and

environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and

regulatory requirements.

IV. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature

by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the

Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a

July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for

Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has

exempted this regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600, et seq., EPA

must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of

any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.

Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit

enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations

of less than 50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the

Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but simply approve

requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the

Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify

that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities

affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship

under the Act, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would

constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state

action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning

SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246,

256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

C. Unfunded Mandates

Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA

must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or

final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated

costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to

the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA

must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative

that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with

statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan

for

[[Page 52868]]

informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly

or uniquely impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not

include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100

million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action proposes to

approve pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes

not new Federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to

State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result

from this action.

D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office

Under 5 U.S.C. section 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report

containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the

General Accounting Office prior to publication of this rule in today's

Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5

U.S.C. section 804(2).

E. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for

judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court

of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 9, 1996. Filing a

petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule

does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such

rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings

to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, and Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

40 CFR Part 60

Air pollution control, Aluminum, Ammonium sulfate plants,

Beverages, Carbon monoxide, Cement industry, Coal, Copper, Dry

cleaners, Electric power plants, Fertilizers, Fluoride, Gasoline, Glass

and glass products, Grains, Graphic arts industry, Household

appliances, Insulation, Intergovernmental relations, Iron, Lead, Lime,

Metallic and nonmetallic mineral processing plants, Metals, Motor

vehicles, Natural gas, Nitric acid plants, Nitrogen dioxide, Paper and

paper products industry, Particulate matter, Paving and roofing

materials, Petroleum, Phosphate, Plastics materials and synthetics,

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sewage disposal, Steel,

Sulfur oxides, Tires, Urethane, Vinyl, Waste treatment and disposal,

Wool, and Zinc.

Dated: September 13, 1996.

Patricia D. Hull,

Acting Regional Administrator.

Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended

as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Subpart JJ--North Dakota

2. Section 52.1820 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(28) to read

as follows:

Sec. 52.1820 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(28) The Governor of North Dakota submitted revisions to the North

Dakota State Implementation Plan and Air Pollution Control Rules with a

letter dated December 21, 1994. The submittal addressed revisions to

SIP Chapter 2, regarding delegatable authorities and asbestos law

revisions, and to air pollution control rules regarding general

provisions; ambient air quality standards; new source performance

standards (NSPS); and national emission standards for hazardous air

pollutants (NESHAPs).

(i) Incorporation by reference.

(A) Revisions to the following sections of the North Dakota Century

Code: 23-25-01; 23-25-03; and 23-25-03.1, effective August 1, 1993.

(B) Revisions to the Air Pollution Control Rules as follows:

General Provisions 33-15-01-17 and 33-15-01-18; Ambient Air Quality

Standards 33-15-02-05 and 33-15-02 Table 1; Standards of Performance

for New Stationary Sources 33-15-12; and Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants 33-15-13, effective December 1, 1994.

PART 60--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, 7411, 7414, 7416, and 7601 as amended

by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. 101-549, 104 Stat.

2399 (November 15, 1990; 402, 409, 415 of the Clean Air Act as

amended, 104 Stat. 2399, unless otherwise noted).

Subpart A--General Provisions

2. Section 60.4(c) is amended by revising the table to read as

follows:

Sec. 60.4 Address.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

Delegation Status of New Source Performance Standards

[(NSPS) for Region VIII]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subpart CO MT\1\ ND\1\ SD\1\ UT\1\ WY

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A--General Provisions......................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

D--Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generators......... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Da--Electric Utility Steam Generators......... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Db--Industrial-Commercial--Institutional Steam

Generators................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Dc--Industrial-Commercial--Institutional Steam

Generators................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

E--Incinerators............................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Ea--Municipal Waste Combustors................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

F--Portland Cement Plants..................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

G--Nitric Acid Plants......................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

H--Sulfuric Acid Plants....................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

I--Asphalt Concrete Plants.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

J--Petroleum Refineries....................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

[[Page 52869]]

K--Petroleum Storage Vessels (after 6/11/73 &

prior to 5/19/78)........................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Ka--Petroleum Storage Vessels (after 5/18/78 &

prior to 7/23/84)........................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Kb--Petroleum Storage Vessels (after 7/23/84). (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

L--Secondary Lead Smelters.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

M--Secondary Brass & Bronze Production Plants. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

N--Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process

Furnaces (after 6/11/73)..................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Na--Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen

Process Furnaces (after 1/20/83)............. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

O--Sewage Treatment Plants.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

P--Primary Copper Smelters.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Q--Primary Zinc Smelters...................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

R--Primary Lead Smelters...................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

S--Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants.......... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

T--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Wet Process

Phosphoric Plants............................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

U--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry:

Superphosphoric Acid Plants.................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

V--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Diammonium

Phosphate Plants............................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

W--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Triple

Superphosphate Plants........................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

X--Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Granular

Triple Superphosphate Storage Facilities..... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Y--Coal Preparation Plants.................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

Z--Ferroalloy Production Facilities........... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

AA--Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces (10/21/

74-8/17/83).................................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

AAa--Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces and

Argon-Oxygen Decarburization Vessels (after 8/

7/83)........................................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

BB--Kraft Pulp Mills.......................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

CC--Glass Manufacturing Plants................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

DD--Grain Elevator............................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

EE--Surface Coating of Metal Furniture........ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

GG--Stationary Gas Turbines................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

HH--Lime Manufacturing Plants................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

KK--Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants.... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

LL--Metallic Mineral Processing Plants........ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

MM--Automobile & Light Duty Truck Surface

Coating Operations........................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

NN--Phosphate Rock Plants..................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

PP--Ammonium Sulfate Manufacturing............ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

QQ--Graphic Arts Industry: Publication

Rotogravure Printing......................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

RR--Pressure Sensitive Tape & Label Surface

Coating...................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

SS--Industrial Surface Coating: Large

Applications................................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

TT--Metal Coil Surface Coating................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

UU--Asphalt Processing & Asphalt Roofing

Manufacture.................................. (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

VV--Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing:

Equipment Leaks of VOC....................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

WW--Beverage Can Surface Coating Industry..... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)

XX--Bulk Gasoline Terminals................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

AAA--Residential Wood Heaters (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

BBB--Rubber Tires............................. (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)

DDD--VOC Emissions from Polymer Manufacturing

Industry..................................... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)

FFF--Flexible Vinyl & Urethane Coating &

Printing..................................... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)

GGG--Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum

Refineries................................... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)

HHH--Synthetic Fiber Production............... (*) (*) (*) ......... (*) (*)

III--VOC Emissions from the Synthetic Organic

Chemical Manufacturing Industry Air Oxidation

Unit Processes............................... (*) (*) (*) (*)

JJJ--Petroleum Dry Cleaners................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

KKK--Equipment Leaks of VOC from Onshore

Natural Gas Processing Plants................ (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

LLL--Onshore Natural Gas Processing: SO2

Emissions.................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

NNN--VOC Emissions from the Synthetic Organic

Chemical Manufacturing Industry Distillation

Operations................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

OOO--Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants.... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

PPP--Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing

Plants....................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

QQQ--VOC Emissions from Petroleum Refinery

Wastewater Systems........................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

RRR--VOC Emissions from Synthetic Organic

Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI)

Reactor Processes............................ (*) (*) (*)

SSS--Magnetic Tape Industry................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

TTT--Plastic Parts for Business Machine

Coatings..................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

UUU--Calciners and Dryers in Mineral

Industries................................... (*) (*) (*)

[[Page 52870]]

VVV--Polymeric Coating of Supporting

Substrates................................... (*) (*) (*) (*) (*)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(*) Indicates approval of state regulation.

\1\ Indicates approval of New Source Performance Standards as part of the State Implementation Plan (SIP).

[FR Doc. 96-25469 Filed 10-7-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P