Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Petition for Review

Federal RegisterFeb 5, 1996

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5417-2]

Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Petition for Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as

amended (``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement

agreement in the following cases: National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc.

versus U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 94-1323 (D.C. Cir.).

This petition for review was filed under Sec. 307(b) of the Act, 42

U.S.C. 7607(b), contesting various aspects of the regulations issued by

EPA on December 15, 1993 for reformulated and conventional gasoline.

For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication

of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to

the proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as

parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the

Department of Justice may withhold or withdraw consent to the proposed

agreement if the comments disclose facts or circumstances that indicate

that such agreement is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or

inconsistent with the requirements of the Act.

A copy of the proposed settlement agreement is available from

Phyllis J. Cochran, Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of

General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street,

SW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should be

sent to Susmita Dubey, Esq. at the above address and must be submitted

on or before March 6, 1996.

Dated: January 30, 1996.

Scott Fulton,

Principal Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 96-2352 Filed 2-2-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.