Administration for Native Americans: Availability of Financial Assistance
Federal RegisterAug 27, 1996
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
SUMMARY: The Administration for Native Americans (ANA) announces the
anticipated availability of fiscal year 1997 funds in four competitive
areas:
(1) Governance and social and economic development;
(2) Governance and social and economic development for Alaska
Native entities;
(3) Environmental regulatory enhancement; and
(4) Native American languages preservation and enhancement.
Financial assistance provided by ANA in support of projects in
these four areas is intended to promote the goal of self-sufficiency
for Native Americans.
APPLICATION KIT: Application kits, containing the necessary forms and
instructions to apply for a grant under this program announcement, may
be obtained from: Department of Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and Families, Administration for Native
Americans, Room 348F, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence
Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20201-0001, Attention: 93612-971,
Telephone: (202) 690-7776.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction and Purpose
The purpose of this program announcement is to announce the
anticipated availability of fiscal year 1997 funds, authorized under
the Native American Programs Act (Act), as amended, to promote the goal
of social and economic self-sufficiency for American Indians, Alaska
Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Native American Pacific Islanders in
four competitive areas.
In order to streamline the application process for eligible
applicants under four competitive areas, ANA is issuing a single
program announcement for fiscal year 1997 funds. Therefore, information
regarding ANA's mission, policy, goals, application requirements,
review criteria and closing dates for each competitive area is included
in this comprehensive announcement.
The Administration for Native Americans promotes the goal of self-
sufficiency in Native American communities primarily through Social and
Economic Development Strategies (SEDS) projects. The Native American
Programs Act also authorizes ANA to establish two additional programs
for (1) environmental regulatory enhancement, and (2) Native American
languages preservation and enhancement.
Funding authorization is provided under sections [803(a), 803(d)
and 803C of the Native American Programs Act of 1974, as amended
(Public Law 93-644, 88 Stat. 2324, 42 U.S.C. 2991b).]
The Indian Environmental Regulatory Enhancement Act of 1990 (Public
Law 101-408) authorizes financial assistance for projects to address
environmental regulatory concerns (Section 803(d) of the Native
American Programs Act of 1974, as amended).
The Native American Languages Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-524)
authorizes financial assistance for projects to promote the survival
and continuing vitality of Native American languages (Section 803C of
the Native American Programs Act of 1974, as amended).
This program announcement is being issued in anticipation of the
appropriation of funds for fiscal year 1997 and the availability of
funds for the four competitive areas is contingent upon sufficient
final appropriations. Proposed projects will be reviewed on a
competitive basis against the specific evaluation criteria presented
under each competitive area in this announcement.
Eligible applicants may compete for and receive a grant award in
each of the three competitive areas (An Alaska Native entity may not
submit an application under both Competitive Areas 1 and 2 for the same
closing date.) However, ANA continues its policy that an applicant may
only submit one application per competitive area.
This program announcement consists of three parts.
Part I--ANA Policy and Goals
Provides general information about ANA's policies and goals for
the four competitive areas.
Part II--ANA Competitive Areas
Describes the four competitive areas under which ANA is
requesting applications:
Governance, Social and Economic Development (SEDS);
Governance, Social and Economic Development (SEDS) for
Alaska Native entities;
Environmental Regulatory Enhancement; and
Native American Languages Preservation and Enhancement.
Each competitive area includes the following sections which
provide area-specific information to be used to develop an
application for ANA funds:
A--Purpose and Availability of Funds;
B--Background;
C--Proposed Projects to be Funded;
D--Eligible Applicants;
E--Grantee Share of the Project;
F--Review Criteria;
G--Application Due Date(s); and
H--Contacts to Obtain Further Information
Part III--General Application Information and Guidance
Provides important information and guidance that applies to all
four competitive areas and that must be taken into account in
developing an application for any of the four areas.
Part I--ANA Policy and Goals
The mission of the Administration for Native Americans (ANA) is to
promote the goal of social and economic self-sufficiency for American
Indians, Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and other Native American
Pacific Islanders.
The Administration for Native Americans believes that a Native
American community is self-sufficient when it can generate and control
the resources necessary to meet its social and economic goals, and the
needs of its members.
The Administration for Native Americans also believes that the
responsibility for achieving self-sufficiency resides with the
governing bodies of Indian tribes, Alaska Native villages, and in the
leadership of Native American groups. A community's progress toward
self-sufficiency is based on its efforts to plan, organize, and direct
resources in a comprehensive manner which is consistent with its
established long-range goals.
The Administration for Native Americans' policy is based on three
interrelated goals:
1. Governance: To assist tribal and Alaska Native village
governments, Native American institutions, and local leadership to
exercise local control and decision-making over their resources.
2. Economic Development: To foster the development of stable,
diversified local economies and economic activities which will provide
jobs and promote economic well-being.
3. Social Development: To support local access to, control of, and
coordination of services and programs which safeguard the health, well-
being and culture of people, provide support
[[Page 44123]]
services and training so people can work, and which are essential to a
thriving and self-sufficient community.
The Administration for Native Americans assists eligible applicants
for the four competitive areas to undertake one to three year
development projects that are part of long-range comprehensive plans to
move toward governance, social, and/or economic self-sufficiency.
For each type of project, applicants must describe a concrete
locally-determined strategy to carry out a proposed project with
fundable objectives and activities.
Local long-range planning must consider the maximum use of all
available resources, how the resources will be directed to development
opportunities, and present a strategy for overcoming the local issues
that hinder movement toward self-sufficiency in the community.
Under each competitive area, ANA will only accept one application
which serves or impacts a reservation, Tribe, or Native American
community.
An application from a federally recognized Tribe, Alaska Native
Village or Native American organization must be from the governing body
of the Tribe or organization. ANA will not accept applications from
tribal components which are tribally-authorized divisions of a larger
tribe, unless the application includes a Tribal resolution which
clearly demonstrates the Tribe's support of the project and the Tribe's
understanding that the other applicant's project supplants the Tribe's
authority to submit an application under that specific competitive area
for the duration of the approved grant period.
Note: If a Tribe or Alaska Native village chooses not to submit
an application under a specific competitive area, it may support
another applicant's project (e.g., a tribal organization) which
serves or impacts the reservation. In this case, the applicant must
include a Tribal resolution which clearly demonstrates the Tribe's
support of the project and the Tribe's understanding that the other
applicant's project supplants the Tribe's authority to submit an
application under that specific competitive area for the duration of
the approved grant period.
Part II--ANA Competitive Areas
The four competitive areas under this Part describe ANA's funding
authorities, priorities, special initiatives, requirements, and review
criteria. However, most of the requirements are standard for all
applications to be submitted under this program announcement. The
standard requirements necessary for each application, as well as
standard ANA program guidance and technical guidance are described in
Part III of this announcement.
An applicant may submit a separate application under any of the
competitive areas described in this Part, as long as the applicant
meets the eligibility requirements that are listed separately under
each area. Applications for SEDS grants from Alaska Native entities may
be submitted under either Competitive Area 1 or Competitive Area 2. An
Alaska Native entity may not submit an application under both
Competitive Areas 1 and 2 for the same closing date.
ANA Competitive Area 1. Social and Economic Development Strategies
(SEDS) Projects
A. Purpose and Availability of Funds
The purpose of this competitive area is to announce the anticipated
availability of fiscal year 1997 financial assistance to promote the
goal of social and economic self-sufficiency for American Indians,
Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Native American Pacific Islanders
through locally developed social and economic development strategies
(SEDS).
Approximately $14 million of financial assistance is anticipated to
be available under this priority area for governance, social and
economic development projects. In fiscal year 1997, ANA anticipates
awarding approximately 120 competitive grants ranging from $30,000 to
$1,000,000 under this competitive area.
B. Background
To achieve its goals, ANA supports tribal and village governments,
and Native American organizations, in their efforts to develop and
implement community-based, long-term governance, social and economic
development strategies (SEDS). These strategies must promote the goal
of self-sufficiency in local communities.
The SEDS approach is based on ANA's program goals and incorporates
two fundamental principles:
1. The local community and its leadership are responsible for
determining goals, setting priorities, and planning and implementing
programs aimed at achieving those goals. The local community is in the
best position to apply its own cultural, political, and socio-economic
values to its long-term strategies and programs.
2. Governance and social and economic development are interrelated.
In order to move toward self-sufficiency, development in one area
should be balanced with development in the others. Consequently,
comprehensive development strategies should address all aspects of the
governmental, economic, and social infrastructures needed to promote
self-sufficient communities.
ANA's SEDS policy is based on the use of the following definitions:
``Governmental infrastructure'' includes the
constitutional, legal, and administrative development requisite for
independent governance.
``Economic infrastructure'' includes the physical,
commercial, industrial and/or agricultural components necessary for a
functioning local economy which supports the life-style embraced by the
Native American community.
``Social infrastructure'' includes those components
through which health, economic well-being and culture are maintained
within the community and that support governance and economic goals.
These definitions should be kept in mind as a local social and
economic development strategy is developed as part of a grant
application.
A community's movement toward self-sufficiency could be jeopardized
if a careful balance between governmental, economic and social
development is not maintained. For example, expansion of social
services, without providing opportunities for employment and economic
development, could lead to dependency on social services.
Conversely, inadequate support services and training could
seriously impede productivity and local economic development.
Additionally, the necessary infrastructures must be developed or
expanded at the community level to support social and economic
development and growth. In designing their social and economic
development strategies, ANA encourages an applicant to use or leverage
all available human, natural, financial, and physical resources.
In discussing their community-based, long-range goals, and the
objectives for the proposed projects, ANA recommends that non-Federally
recognized and off-reservation groups include a description of what
constitutes their specific community.
ANA encourages the development and maintenance of comprehensive
strategic plans which are an integral part of attaining and supporting
the balance necessary for successful activities that lead to self-
sufficiency.
C. Proposed Projects to be Funded
This section provides descriptions of activities which are
consistent with the SEDS philosophy. Proposed activities should be
tailored to reflect the
[[Page 44124]]
governance, social and economic development needs of the local
community and should be consistent and supportive of the proposed
project objectives.
The types of projects which ANA may fund include, but are not
limited to, the following:
Governance
Improvements in the governmental, judicial and/or
administrative infrastructures of tribal and village governments (such
as strengthening or streamlining management procedures or the
development of tribal court systems);
Increasing the ability of tribes, villages, and Native
American groups and organizations to plan, develop, and administer a
comprehensive program to support community social and economic self-
sufficiency (including strategic planning);
Increasing awareness of and exercising the legal rights
and benefits to which Native Americans are entitled, either by virtue
of treaties, the Federal trust relationship, legislative authority,
executive orders, administrative and court decisions, or as citizens of
a particular state, territory, or of the United States.
Status clarification activities for Native groups seeking
Federal or State tribal recognition, such as performing research or any
other function necessary to submit a petition for Federal
acknowledgement or in response to any obvious deficiencies cited by the
Bureau of Acknowledgement and Research (BAR), Department of the
Interior, in a petition from a Native group seeking Federal
recognition; and
Development of and/or amendments to tribal constitutions,
court procedures and functions, by-laws or codes, and council or
executive branch duties and functions.
Economic Development
Development of a community economic infrastructure that
will result in businesses, jobs, and an economic support structure.
Establishment or expansion of businesses and jobs in areas
such as tourism, specialty agriculture, light and/or heavy
manufacturing, construction, housing and fisheries or aquaculture;
Stabilizing and diversifying a Native community's economic
base through business development ventures;
Creation of microenterprises or private sector
development;
Establishment or expansion of businesses and jobs that
utilize Indian tax incentives passed in the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1993; and
Social Development
Enhancing tribal capabilities to design or administer
programs aimed at strengthening the social environment desired by the
local community;
Developing local and intertribal models related to
comprehensive planning and delivery of services;
Developing programs or activities to preserve and enhance
tribal heritage and culture; and
Establishing programs which involve extended families or
tribal societies in activities that strengthen cultural identity and
promote community development or self-esteem.
D. Eligible Applicants
Current ANA SEDS grantees whose project period terminates in fiscal
year 1997 (October 1, 1996-September 30, 1997) are eligible to apply
for a grant award under this program announcement. (The Project Period
is noted in Block 9 of the ``Financial Assistance Award'' document).
Additionally, provided they are not current ANA SEDS grantees, the
following organizations are eligible to apply under this competitive
area:
Federally recognized Indian Tribes;
Consortia of Indian Tribes;
Incorporated non-federally recognized Tribes;
Incorporated nonprofit multi-purpose community-based
Indian organizations;
Urban Indian Centers;
National or regional incorporated nonprofit Native
American organizations with Native American community-specific
objectives;
Alaska Native villages as defined in the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) and/or nonprofit village consortia;
Incorporated nonprofit Alaska Native multi-purpose
community-based organizations;
Nonprofit Alaska Native Regional Corporations/Associations
in Alaska with village specific projects;
Nonprofit Native organizations in Alaska with village
specific projects;
Public and nonprofit private agencies serving Native
Hawaiians;
Public and nonprofit private agencies serving native
peoples from Guam, American Samoa, Palau, or the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands. (The populations served may be located on
these islands or in the United States); and
Tribally Controlled Community Colleges, Tribally
Controlled Post-Secondary Vocational Institutions, and colleges and
universities located in Hawaii, Guam, American Samoa, Palau, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands which serve Native
American Pacific Islanders.
Proof of an applicant's nonprofit status, such as an IRS
determination of nonprofit status under IRS Code 501(c)(3), must be
included in the application.
If the applicant, other than a tribe or an Alaska Native Village
government, is proposing a project benefiting Native Americans or
Native Alaskans, or both, it must provide assurance that its duly
elected or appointed board of directors is representative of the
community to be served. An organization can conclusively establish that
it meets this requirement through a signed statement or resolution
stating that its duly elected or appointed board of directors are
either Native Americans or Native Alaskans or a copy of the
organizational charter or by-laws that clearly states that the
organization has a board drawn from members of those groups.
Note: Under each competitive area, ANA will only accept one
application which serves or impacts a reservation, Tribe, or Native
American community. If a Tribe or Alaska Native village chooses not
to submit an application under a specific competitive area, it may
support another applicant's project (e.g., a tribal organization)
which serves or impacts the reservation.
In this case, the applicant must include a Tribal resolution which
clearly demonstrates the Tribe's support of the project and the Tribe's
understanding that the other applicant's project supplants the Tribe's
authority to submit an application under that specific competitive area
for the duration of the approved grant period.
E. Grantee Share of the Project
Grantees must provide at least 20 percent of the total approved
cost of the project. (The total approved cost of the project is the sum
of the ACF share and the non-Federal share.) The non-Federal share may
be met by cash or in-kind contributions; although applicants are
encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions.
Therefore, a project requesting $300,000 in Federal funds must include
a match of at least $75,000 (20% total project cost).
As per 45 CFR Part 74.2, In-Kind contributions is defined as ``the
value of non-cash contributions provided by non-Federal third parties.
Third party-in kind contributions may be in the form of real property,
equipment, supplies and other expendable property, and the value of
goods and services directly benefiting and specifically identifiable to
the project or program.''
[[Page 44125]]
In addition it may include other Federal funding sources where its
legislation or regulations authorizes using specific types of funds for
a match and provided the source relates to the ANA project, as follows:
Indian Child Welfare funds, through the Department of the
Interior;
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance funds,
through the Department of the Interior and the Department of Health and
Human Services; and
Community Development Block Grant funds, through the
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
An itemized budget detailing the applicant's non-Federal share, and
its source, must be included in an application.
If an applicant plans to charge indirect costs in its ANA
application, a current copy of its Indirect Cost Agreement must be
included in the application.
A request for a waiver of the non-Federal share requirement may be
submitted in accordance with 45 CFR 1336.50(b)(3) of the Native
American Program Regulations.
Note: Applications originating from American Samoa, Guam, Palau,
or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands are covered
under Section 501(d) of Public Law 95-134, as amended (48 U.S.C.
1469a) under which HHS waives any requirement for local matching
funds under $200,000 (including in-kind contributions).
F. Review Criteria
A proposed project should reflect the purposes of ANA's SEDS policy
and program goals (described in the Background section of this
competitive area), include a social and economic development strategy
which reflects the needs and specific circumstances of the local
community, and address the specific developmental steps that the tribe
or Native American community is undertaking toward self-sufficiency.
The evaluation criteria are closely related to each other and are
considered as a whole in judging the overall quality of an application.
Points are awarded only to applications which are responsive to this
competitive area and these criteria. Proposed projects will be reviewed
on a competitive basis using the following evaluation criteria:
(1) Long-Range Goals and Available Resources. (15 points)
(a) The application describes the long-range goals and strategy,
including:
How specific social, governance and economic long-range
community goals relate to the proposed project and strategy;
How the community intends to achieve these goals;
The relationship between the long-range goals and the
applicant's comprehensive community social and economic development
plan. (Inclusion of the community's entire development plan is not
necessary); and
A clearly delineated social and economic development
strategy (SEDS).
The application documents the type of involvement and support of
the community in the planning process and implementation of the
proposed project. A Tribe may meet this requirement by submitting a
resolution stating that community involvement has occurred in the
project planning. All other eligible applicants may meet this
requirement by providing documentation of community support/
involvement. The type of community you serve will determine the type of
documentation necessary.
For example, a tribal organization may submit resolutions
supporting the project proposal from each of its members tribes, as
well as a resolution from the applicant organization. Other examples of
documentation include: community surveys; minutes of community
meetings; questionnaires; tribal presentations; and/or discussion/
position papers.
Applications from National Indian and Native organizations must
clearly demonstrate a need for the project, explain how the project was
originated, state who the intended beneficiaries will be, and describe
how the recipients will actually benefit from the project. National
Indian and Native organizations should define their membership and
describe how the organization operates.
(b) Available resources (other than ANA and the non-Federal share)
which will assist, and be coordinated with the project are described.
These resources should be documented by letters or documents of
commitment of resources, not merely letters of support.
``Letters of support'' merely express another
organization's endorsement of a proposed project. Support letters are
not binding commitment letters or do not factually establish the
authenticity of other resources.
``Letters and other documents of commitment'' are binding
when they specifically state the nature, the amount, and conditions
under which another agency or organization will support a project
funded with ANA funds.
For example, a letter from another Federal agency or foundation
pledging a commitment of $200,000 in construction funding to complement
proposed ANA funded pre-construction activity is evidence of a firm
funding commitment. These resources may be human, natural or financial,
and may include other Federal and non-Federal resources. (Applicant
statements that additional funding will be sought from other specific
sources are not considered a binding commitment of outside resources.)
Note: Applicants from the Native American Pacific Islands are
not required to provide a 20% match for the non-Federal share if it
is under $200,000 and may not have points reduced for this policy.
They are, however, expected to coordinate non-ANA resources for the
proposed project, as are all ANA applicants.
(2) Organizational Capabilities and Qualifications. (10 points)
(a) The management and administrative structure of the applicant is
explained. Evidence of the applicant's ability to manage a project of
the proposed scope is demonstrated. The application clearly shows the
successful management of projects of similar scope by the organization,
and/or by the individuals designated to manage the project.
(b) Position descriptions and/or resumes of key personnel,
including those of consultants, are presented. The position
descriptions and/or resumes relate specifically to the staff proposed
in the Approach Page and in the proposed Budget of the application.
Position descriptions very clearly describe each position and its
duties and clearly relate to the personnel staffing required to achieve
the project objectives. Resumes demonstrate that the proposed staff are
qualified to carry out the project activities. Either the position
descriptions or the resumes contain the qualifications and/or
specialized skills necessary for overall quality management of the
project. Resumes must be included if individuals have been identified
for positions in the application.
Note: Applicants are strongly encouraged to give preference to
Native Americans in hiring staff and subcontracting services under
an approved ANA grant.
(3) Project Objectives, Approach and Activities. (45 points)
The application proposes specific project Objective Work Plans with
activities related to each specific objective.
The Objective Work Plan(s) in the application includes project
objectives and activities for each budget period proposed and
demonstrates that each of the objectives and its activities:
Is measurable and/or quantifiable in terms of results or
outcomes;
Supports the community's social and economic development
strategy;
Clearly relates to the community's long-range goals;
[[Page 44126]]
Can be accomplished with the available or expected
resources during the proposed project period;
Indicates when the objective, and major activities under
each objective, will be accomplished;
Specifies who will conduct the activities under each
objective; and
Supports a project that will be completed, self-
sustaining, or financed by other than ANA funds at the end of the
project period.
(4) Results or Benefits Expected. (20 points)
Completion of the proposed objectives will result in specific,
measurable results. The application shows how the expected results will
help the community meet its long-range goals. The specific information
provided in the narrative and objective work plans on expected results
or benefits for each objective is the standard upon which its
achievement can be evaluated at the end of each budget year.
(5) Budget. (10 points)
A detailed and fully explained budget is provided for each budget
period requested which:
Justifies each line item, with a well-written
justification, in the budget categories in Section B of the Budget
Information of the application, including the applicant's non-Federal
share and its source;
Includes and justifies sufficient cost and other necessary
details to facilitate the determination of cost allowability and the
relevance of these costs to the proposed project; and
Requests funds which are appropriate and necessary for the
scope of the proposed project.
For business development projects, the proposal demonstrates that
the expected return on the funds used to develop the project provides a
reasonable operating income and return within a future specified time
frame.
Note: (Applicants from the Native American Pacific Islands are
exempt from the $200,000 non-Federal share requirement).
G. Application Due Date
The closing dates for submission of applications under this
competitive area are: October 25, 1996, February 14, 1997, and May 23,
1997.
H. For Further Information Contact
Sharon McCully (202) 690-5780, Department of Health and Human
Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration for
Native Americans, 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 348-F,
Washington, D.C. 20201-0001
Competitive Area 2. Alaska-Specific Social and Economic Development
Strategies (SEDS) Projects
A. Purpose and Availability of Funds
The purpose of this competitive area is to announce the anticipated
availability of fiscal year 1997 funds for Alaska Native social and
economic development projects. Approximately $1.5 million of financial
assistance is anticipated to be available under this competitive area
for Alaska Native governance, social and economic development projects.
ANA plans to award approximately 15-18 grants under this
competitive area. For individual village projects, the funding level
for a budget period of 12 months will be up to $100,000; for regional
nonprofit and village consortia, the funding level for a budget period
of 12 months will be up to $150,000, commensurate with approved multi-
village objectives.
B. Background
Based on the three ANA goals described in Part I, ANA implemented a
special Alaska social and economic development initiative in fiscal
year 1984. This special effort was designed to provide financial
assistance at the village level or for village-specific projects aimed
at improving a village's governance capabilities and for social and
economic development.
This competitive area continues to implement this special
initiative. ANA believes both the nonprofit and for-profit corporations
in Alaska can play an important supportive role in assisting individual
villages to develop and implement their own locally determined
strategies which capitalize on opportunities afforded to Alaska Natives
under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), Public Law 92-
203.
The Administration for Native Americans does not fund objectives or
activities for the core administration of an organization. However, ANA
will consider funding core administrative capacity building projects at
the village government level if the village does not have governing
systems in place.
C. Proposed Projects to be Funded
Examples of the types of projects that ANA may fund include, but
are not limited to, projects that will:
Governance
Initiate demonstration programs at the regional level to
allow Native people to become involved in developing strategies to
maintain and develop their economic subsistence base;
Assist villages in developing land use capabilities and
skills in the areas of land and natural resource management and
protection, resource assessment and conducting environmental impact
studies;
Assist village consortia in the development of tribal
constitutions, ordinances, codes and tribal court systems;
Develop agreements between the State and villages that
transfer programs jurisdictions, and /or control to Native entities;
Strengthen village government control of land management,
including land protection, through coordination of land use planning
with village corporations and cities, if appropriate;
Assist in status clarification activities;
Initiate village level mergers between village councils,
village corporations and others to coordinate programs and services
which safeguard the health, well being and culture of a community and
its people;
Strengthen local governance capabilities through the
development of village consortia and regional IRAs (Indian
Reorganization Act councils organized under the Indian Reorganization
Act, 25 U.S.C. 473a);
Assist villages in preparing and coordinating plans for
the development and/or improvement of water and sewer systems within
the village boundaries;
Assist villages in establishing initiatives through which
youth may participate in the governance of the community and be trained
to assume leadership roles in village governments; and
Consider strategies and plans to protect against, monitor,
and assist when catastrophic events occur, such as oil spills or
earthquakes.
Economic Development
Assist villages in developing businesses and industries
which: 1) use local materials; 2) create jobs for Alaska Natives; 3)
are capable of high productivity at a small scale of operation; and 4)
complement traditional and necessary seasonal activities;
Substantially increase and strengthen efforts to establish
and improve the village and regional infrastructure and the
capabilities to develop and manage resources in a highly competitive
cash-economy system;
Assist villages, or consortia of villages, in developing
subsistence compatible industries that will retain local dollars in
villages;
[[Page 44127]]
Assist in the establishment or expansion of new native-
owned businesses; and
Assist villages in labor export; i.e., people leaving the
local communities for seasonal work and returning to their communities.
Social Development
Assist in developing training and education programs for
local jobs in education, government, and health-related fields; and
work with these agencies to encourage job replacement of non-Natives by
trained Natives;
Develop local models related to comprehensive planning and
delivery of social services;
Develop new service programs, initially established with
ANA funds, which will be funded for continued operation (after the ANA
grant terminates) by local communities or the private sector;
Develop or coordinate with State-funded projects,
activities designed to decrease the incidence of child abuse and
neglect, fetal alcohol syndrome, and/or suicides;
Assist in obtaining licenses to provide housing or related
services from State or local governments; and
Develop businesses to provide relief for caretakers
needing respite from human service-related care work.
D. Eligible Applicants
Current ANA SEDS grantees in Alaska whose project period terminates
in fiscal year 1997 (October 1, 1996-September 30, 1997) are eligible
to apply for a grant award under this program announcement. (The
Project Period is noted in Block 9 of the ``Financial Assistance
Award'' document).
Additionally, provided they are not current ANA SEDS grantees, the
following organizations are eligible to apply under this competitive
area:
Federally recognized Indian Tribes in Alaska;
Alaska Native villages as defined in the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) and/or nonprofit village consortia;
Incorporated nonprofit Alaska Native multi-purpose
community-based organizations;
Nonprofit Alaska Native Regional Corporations/Associations
in Alaska with village specific projects; and
Nonprofit Native organizations in Alaska with village
specific projects.
Proof of an applicant's nonprofit status, such as an IRS
determination of nonprofit status under IRS Code 501(c)(3), must be
included in the application.
If the applicant, other than a tribe or an Alaska Native Village
government, is proposing a project benefiting Native Americans or
Native Alaskans, or both, it must provide assurance that its duly
elected or appointed board of directors is representative of the
community to be served. An organization can conclusively establish that
it meets this requirement through a signed statement or resolution
stating that its duly elected or appointed board of directors are
either Native Americans or Native Alaskans or a copy of the
organizational charter or by-laws that clearly states that the
organization has a board drawn from members of those groups.
Although for-profit regional corporations established under ANCSA
are not eligible applicants, individual villages and Indian communities
are encouraged to use the for-profit corporations as subcontractors and
to collaborate with them in joint-venture projects for promoting social
and economic self-sufficiency. ANA encourages the for-profit
corporations to assist the villages in developing applications and to
participate as subcontractors in a project.
Note: Under each competitive area, ANA will only accept one
application which serves or impacts a reservation, Tribe, or Native
American community. If a Tribe or Alaska Native village chooses not
to submit an application under a specific competitive area, it may
support another applicant's project (e.g., a tribal organization)
which serves or impacts the reservation.
In this case, the applicant must include a Tribal resolution which
clearly demonstrates the Tribe's support of the project and the Tribe's
understanding that the other applicant's project supplants the Tribe's
authority to submit an application under that specific competitive area
for the duration of the approved grant period.
E. Grantee Share of the Project
Grantees must provide at least 20 percent of the total approved
cost of the project. The total approved cost of the project is the sum
of the ACF share and the non-Federal share. The non-Federal share may
be met by cash or in-kind contributions, although applicants are
encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions.
Therefore, a project requesting $100,000 in Federal funds must include
a match of at least $25,000 (20% total project cost).
As per 45 CFR Part 74.2, In-Kind contributions is defined as ``the
value of non-cash contributions provided by non-Federal third parties.
Third party-in-kind contributions may be in the form of real property,
equipment, supplies and other expendable property, and the value of
goods and services directly benefiting and specifically identifiable to
the project or program.''
In addition it may include other Federal funding sources where its
legislation or regulations authorizes using specific types of funds for
a match and provided the source relates to the ANA project, as follows:
Indian Child Welfare funds, through the Department of
Interior;
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance funds,
through the Department of Interior and the Department of Health and
Human Services; and
Community Development Block Grant funds, through the
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
An itemized budget detailing the applicant's non-Federal share, and
its source, must be included in an application.
If an applicant plans to charge indirect costs in its ANA
application, a current copy of its Indirect Cost Agreement must be
included in the application.
A request for a waiver of the non-Federal share requirement may be
submitted in accordance with 45 CFR 1336.50(b)(3) of the Native
American Program Regulations.
F. Review Criteria
A proposed project should reflect the purposes of ANA's SEDS policy
and goals (described in the Background section of this competitive area
and in the Background section of Competitive Area 1), include a social
and economic development strategy which reflects the needs and specific
circumstances of the local community, and address the specific
developmental steps that the tribe or Native American community is
undertaking toward self-sufficiency.
The evaluation criteria are closely related to each other and are
considered as a whole in judging the overall quality of an application.
Points are awarded only to applications which are responsive to this
competitive area and these criteria. Proposed projects will be reviewed
on a competitive basis using the following evaluation criteria:
(1) Long-Range Goals and Available Resources. (15 points)
(a) The application describes the long-range goals and strategy,
including:
How specific social, governance and economic long-range
community goals relate to the proposed project and strategy;
How the community intends to achieve these goals;
The relationship between the long-range goals and the
applicant's
[[Page 44128]]
comprehensive community social and economic development plan.
(Inclusion of the community's entire development plan is not
necessary); and
A clearly delineated social and economic development
strategy (SEDS).
The application documents the type of involvement and support of
the community in the planning process and implementation of the
proposed project. A Tribe may meet this requirement by submitting a
resolution stating that community involvement has occurred in the
project planning. All other eligible applicants may meet this
requirement by providing documentation of community support/
involvement. The type of community you serve will determine the type of
documentation necessary.
For example, a tribal organization may submit resolutions
supporting the project proposal from each of its members tribes, as
well as a resolution from the applicant organization. Other examples of
documentation include: community surveys; minutes of community
meetings; questionnaires; tribal presentations; and/or discussion/
position papers.
Applications from National Indian and Native organizations must
clearly demonstrate a need for the project, explain how the project was
originated, state who the intended beneficiaries will be, and describe
how the recipients will actually benefit from the project. National
Indian and Native organizations should describe their membership and
define how the organization operates.
(b) Available resources (other than ANA and the non-Federal share)
which will assist, and be coordinated with the project are described.
These resources should be documented by letters or documents of
commitment of resources, not merely letters of support.
``Letters of support'' merely express another
organization's endorsement of a proposed project. Support letters are
not binding commitment letters or do not factually establish the
authenticity of other resources.
``Letters and other documents of commitment'' are binding
when they specifically state the nature, the amount, and conditions
under which another agency or organization will support a project
funded with ANA funds.
For example, a letter from another Federal agency or foundation
pledging a commitment of $200,000 in construction funding to complement
proposed ANA funded pre-construction activity is evidence of a firm
funding commitment. These resources may be human, natural or financial,
and may include other Federal and non-Federal resources. (Applicant
statements that additional funding will be sought from other specific
sources are not considered a binding commitment of outside resources.)
(2) Organizational Capabilities and Qualifications. (10 points)
(a) The management and administrative structure of the applicant is
explained. Evidence of the applicant's ability to manage a project of
the proposed scope is demonstrated. The application clearly shows the
successful management of projects of similar scope by the organization,
and/or by the individuals designated to manage the project.
(b) Position descriptions and/or resumes of key personnel,
including those of consultants, are presented. The position
descriptions and/or resumes relate specifically to the staff proposed
in the Approach Page and in the proposed Budget of the application.
Position descriptions very clearly describe each position and its
duties and clearly relate to the personnel staffing required to achieve
the project objectives. Resumes demonstrate that the proposed staff are
qualified to carry out the project activities. Either the position
descriptions or the resumes contain the qualifications and/or
specialized skills necessary for overall quality management of the
project. Resumes must be included if individuals have been identified
for positions in the application.
Note: Applicants are strongly encouraged to give preference to
Native Americans in hiring staff and subcontracting services under
an approved ANA grant.
(3) Project Objectives, Approach and Activities. (45 points)
The application proposes specific project objective work plans with
activities related to each specific objective. The objective work
plan(s) in the application includes project objectives and activities
for each budget period proposed and demonstrates that each of the
objectives and its activities:
Is measurable and/or quantifiable in terms of results or
outcomes;
Supports the community's social and economic development
strategy;
Clearly relates to the community's long-range goals;
Can be accomplished with the available or expected
resources during the proposed project period;
Indicates when the objective, and major activities under
each objective, will be accomplished;
Specifies who will conduct the activities under each
objective; and
Supports a project that will be completed, self-
sustaining, or financed by other than ANA funds at the end of the
project period.
(4) Results or Benefits Expected. (20 points)
Completion of the proposed objectives will result in specific,
measurable results. The application shows how the expected results will
help the community meet its long-range goals. The specific information
provided in the narrative and objective work plans on expected results
or benefits for each objective is the standard upon which its
achievement can be evaluated at the end of each budget year.
(5) Budget. (10 points)
A detailed and fully explained budget is provided for each budget
period requested which:
Justifies each line item, with a well-written
justification, in the budget categories in Section B of the Budget
Information of the application, including the applicant's non-Federal
share and its source;
Includes and justifies sufficient cost and other necessary
details to facilitate the determination of cost allowability and the
relevance of these costs to the proposed project; and
Requests funds which are appropriate and necessary for the
scope of the proposed project.
For business development projects, the proposal demonstrates that
the expected return on the funds used to develop the project provides a
reasonable operating income and return within a future specified time
frame.
G. Application Due Date
The closing date for submission of applications under this
competitive area is: May 23, 1997.
H. For Further Information Contact
Sharon McCully (202) 690-5780, Department of Health and Human
Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration for
Native Americans, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 348-F, Washington,
DC 20201-0001
Competitive Area 3. Indian Environmental Regulatory Enhancement
Projects
A. Purpose and Availability of Funds
The purpose of this competitive area is to announce the anticipated
availability of fiscal year 1997 funds for environmental regulatory
enhancement projects. Approximately $3 million of financial assistance
is anticipated to be available under this announcement for
environmental regulatory enhancement projects. ANA expects to award
approximately 35 grants under this
[[Page 44129]]
competitive area. The funding level for a budget period of 12 months
will be up to $250,000.
B. Background
Despite an increasing environmental responsibility and growing
awareness of environmental issues on Indian lands, there has been a
lack of resources available to tribes to develop tribal environmental
programs that are responsive to tribal needs. In many cases, this lack
of resources has resulted in a delay in action on the part of the
tribes.
Some of the critical issues identified by tribes before
Congressional committees include:
the need for assistance to train professional staff to
monitor and enforce tribal environmental programs;
the lack of adequate data for tribes to develop
environmental statutes and establish environmental quality standards;
and
the lack of resources to conduct studies to identify
sources of pollution and the ability to determine the impact on
existing environmental quality.
As a result, Congress enacted the Indian Environmental Regulatory
Enhancement Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-408) to strengthen tribal
governments through building capacity within the tribes in order to
identify, plan, develop, and implement environmental programs in a
manner that is consistent with tribal culture. ANA is to support these
activities on a government-to-government basis in a way that recognizes
tribal sovereignty and is consistent with tribal culture.
The Administration for Native Americans believes that
responsibility for achieving environmental regulatory enhancement rests
with the governing bodies of Indian tribes, Alaska Native villages, and
with the leadership of Native American groups.
``Environmental regulatory enhancement'' includes (but is not
limited to) the planning, development, and application of laws,
training, monitoring, and enforcement procedures, tribal courts,
environmental laboratories and other facilities, and associated
regulatory activities to strengthen the tribal government's capacity to
enhance the quality of reservation life as measured by the reduction of
pollutants in the air, water, soil, food and materials encountered by
inhabitants of tribes and villages.
Progress toward the goal of environmental regulatory enhancement
would include the strengthening of tribal environmental laws, providing
for the training and education of those employees responsible for
ensuring compliance with and enforcement of these laws, and the
development of programs to conduct compliance and enforcement
functions.
Other functions leading toward enhancing local regulatory capacity
include, but are not limited to:
Environmental assessments;
Development and use of environmental laboratories; and
Development of court systems for enforcement of tribal and
Federal environmental laws.
Ultimate success in this program will be realized when the
applicant's desired level of environmental quality is acquired and
maintained.
C. Proposed Projects to be Funded
Financial assistance provided by ANA is available for developmental
projects designed to assist tribes in advancing their capacity and
capability to plan for and:
Develop or enhance the tribal environmental regulatory
infrastructure required to support a tribal environmental program, and
to regulate and enforce environmental activities on Indian lands
pursuant to Federal and Indian law;
Develop regulations, ordinances and laws to protect the
environment;
Develop the technical and program capacity to carry out a
comprehensive tribal environmental program and perform essential
environmental program functions;
Promote environmental training and education of tribal
employees;
Develop technical and program capability to meet tribal
and Federal regulatory requirements;
Develop technical and program capability to monitor
compliance and enforcement of tribal environmental regulations,
ordinances, and laws; and
Ensure the tribal court system enforcement requirements
are developed in concert with and support the tribe's comprehensive
environmental program.
D. Eligible Applicants
The following organizations are eligible to apply under this
competitive area:
Federally recognized Indian tribes;
Incorporated non-federally recognized Indian tribes;
Alaska Native villages as defined in the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) and/or nonprofit village consortia;
Nonprofit Alaska Native Regional Corporations/Associations
with village specific projects; and
Other tribal or village organizations or consortia of
Indian tribes.
The following organizations are not eligible to apply:
Urban Indian Centers;
Incorporated nonprofit multi-purpose community-based
Indian organizations;
Public and nonprofit private agencies serving: Native
Hawaiians, peoples from Guam, American Samoa, Palau, or the
Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands;
Incorporated nonprofit Alaska Native multi-purpose
community based organizations; and
National or regional incorporated nonprofit Native
American organizations with Native American community-specific
objectives.
Proof of an applicant's nonprofit status, such as an IRS
determination of nonprofit status under IRS Code 501(c)(3), must be
included in the application.
If the applicant, other than a tribe or an Alaska Native Village
government, is proposing a project benefiting Native Americans or
Native Alaskans, or both, it must provide assurance that its duly
elected or appointed board of directors is representative of the
community to be served. An organization can conclusively establish that
it meets this requirement through a signed statement or resolution
stating that its duly elected or appointed board of directors are
either Native Americans or Native Alaskans or a copy of the
organizational charter or by-laws that clearly states that the
organization has a board drawn from members of those groups.
Note: Under each competitive area, ANA will only accept one
application which serves or impacts a reservation, Tribe or Native
American community. If a Tribe or Alaska native village chooses not
to submit an application under a specific competitive area, it may
support another applicant's project (e.g., a tribal organization)
which serves or impacts the reservation.
In this case, the applicant must include a Tribal resolution which
clearly demonstrates the Tribe's support of the project and the Tribe's
understanding that the other applicant's project supplants the Tribe's
authority to submit an application under that specific competitive area
for the duration of the approved grant period.
E. Grantee Share of the Project
Grantees must provide at least 20 percent of the total approved
cost of the project. The total approved cost of the project is the sum
of the ACF share and the non-Federal share. The non-Federal share may
be met by cash or in-kind contributions; although applicants are
encouraged to meet their match requirement through cash contributions.
[[Page 44130]]
Therefore, a project requesting $250,000 in Federal funds must include
a match of at least $62,500 (20% of total project cost).
As per 45 CFR Part 74.2, In-Kind contributions is defined as ``the
value of non-cash contributions provided by non-Federal third parties.
Third party-in kind contributions may be in the form of real property,
equipment, supplies and other expendable property, and the value of
goods and services directly benefiting and specifically identifiable to
the project or program.''
In addition it may include other Federal funding sources where its
legislation or regulations authorizes using specific types of funds for
a match and provided the source relates to the ANA project, as follows:
Indian Child Welfare funds, through the Department of
Interior;
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance funds,
through the Department of Interior and the Department of Health and
Human Services; and
Community Development Block Grant funds, through the
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
An itemized budget detailing the applicant's non-Federal share, and
its source, must be included in an application.
If an applicant plans to charge indirect costs in its ANA
application, a current copy of its Indirect Cost Agreement must be
included in the application.
A request for a waiver of the non-Federal share requirement may be
submitted in accordance with 45 CFR 1336.50(b)(3) of the Native
American Program Regulations.
F. Review Criteria
A proposed project should reflect the environmental regulatory
purposes stated and described in the Background section of this
competitive area. The evaluation criteria are closely related to each
other and are considered as a whole in judging the overall quality of
an application. Points are awarded only to applications which are
responsive to this competitive area and these criteria. Proposed
projects will be reviewed on a competitive basis using the following
evaluation criteria:
(1) Long-Range Goals and Available Resources. (15 points)
(a) The application describes the long-range goals and strategy,
including:
how specific environmental regulatory enhancement long-
range goal(s) relate to the proposed project and strategy;
how the community intends to achieve these goals;
the applicant's specific environmental regulatory needs;
and
a clearly delineated strategy to improve the capability of
the governing body of a tribe to regulate environmental quality through
enhancing local capacity to perform necessary regulatory functions.
The application documents the type of involvement and support of
the community in the planning process and implementation of the
proposed project. A Tribe may meet this requirement by submitting a
resolution stating that community involvement has occurred in the
project planning. All other eligible applicants may meet this
requirement by providing documentation of community support/
involvement. The type of community you serve will determine the type of
documentation necessary.
For example, a tribal organization may submit resolutions
supporting the project proposal from each of its member tribes, as well
as a resolution from the applicant organization. Other examples of
documentation include: community surveys; minutes of community
meetings; questionnaires; tribal presentations; and/or discussion/
position papers.
(b) Available resources (other than ANA and the non-Federal share)
which will assist, and be coordinated with the project are described.
These resources should be documented by letters or documents of
commitment of resources, not merely letters of support.
``Letters of support'' merely express another
organization's endorsement of a proposed project. Support letters are
not binding commitment letters or do not factually establish the
authenticity of other resources.
``Letters and other documents of commitment'' are binding
when they specifically state the nature, the amount, and conditions
under which another agency or organization will support a project
funded with ANA funds.
For example, a letter from another Federal agency or foundation
pledging a commitment of $200,000 in construction funding to complement
proposed ANA funded pre-construction activity is evidence of a firm
funding commitment. These resources may be human, natural or financial,
and may include other Federal and non-Federal resources. (Applicant
statements that additional funding will be sought from other specific
sources are not considered a binding commitment of outside resources.)
(2) Organizational Capabilities and Qualifications. (15 points)
(a) The management and administrative structure of the applicant is
described and explained. Evidence of the applicant's ability to manage
a project of the scope proposed is well documented. The application
clearly shows the successful management of projects of similar scope by
the organization, and/or by the individuals designated to manage or
consult on the project. The tribe itself may not have experience to
meet this requirement but the proposed staff and consultants should
have the required qualifications and experience. The application should
clearly describe any previous or current activities of the applicant
organization or proposed staff and/or consultants in support of
environmental regulatory enhancement.
(b) Position descriptions and/or resumes of key personnel,
including those of consultants, are presented. The position
descriptions and/or resumes relate specifically to the staff proposed
in the Approach Page and in the proposed Budget of the application.
Position descriptions very clearly describe each position and its
duties and clearly relate to the personnel staffing required to achieve
the project objectives. Resumes indicate that the proposed staff are
qualified to carry out the project activities. Either the position
descriptions or the resumes contain the qualifications and/or
specialized skills necessary for overall quality management of the
project. Resumes must be included if individuals have been identified
for positions in the application.
Note: Applicants are strongly encouraged to give preference to
Native Americans in hiring staff and subcontracting services under
an approved ANA grant.
(3) Project Objectives, Approach and Activities. (40 points)
The application proposes specific project objective work plans with
activities related to each specific objective. The objective work
plan(s) in the application includes project objectives and activities
for each budget period proposed and demonstrates that each of the
objectives and its activities:
Is measurable and/or quantifiable in terms of results or
outcomes;
Supports the community's strategy for environmental
regulatory enhancement;
Clearly relates to the community's long-range
environmental goals;
Can be accomplished with the available or expected
resources during the proposed project period;
Indicates when the objective, and major activities under
each objective, will be accomplished;
Specifies who will conduct the activities under each
objective; and
[[Page 44131]]
Supports a project that will be completed, self-
sustaining, or financed by other than ANA funds at the end of the
project period.
(4) Results or Benefits Expected. (20 points)
Completion of the proposed objectives will result in specific,
measurable results. The application shows how the expected results will
help the community meet its long-range environmental goals. The
specific information provided in the narrative and objective work plans
on expected results or benefits for each objective is the standard upon
which its achievement can be evaluated at the end of each budget year.
(5) Budget. (10 points)
A detailed and fully explained budget is provided for each budget
period requested which:
Justifies each line item, with a well-written
justification, in the budget categories in Section B of the Budget
Information of the application, including the applicant's non-Federal
share and its source;
Includes and justifies sufficient cost and other necessary
details to facilitate the determination of cost allowability and the
relevance of these costs to the proposed project; and
Requests funds which are appropriate and necessary for the
scope of the proposed project.
G. Application Due Date
The closing date for submission of applications under this
competitive area is March 7, 1997.
H. For Further Information Contact
Sharon McCully (202) 690-5780, Department of Health and Human
Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration for
Native Americans, 200 Independence Ave., S.W., Room 348-F, Washington,
D.C. 20201-0001
Competitive Area 4. Native American Languages Preservation and
Enhancement Projects
A. Purpose and Availability of Funds
The purpose of this competitive area is to announce the anticipated
availability of fiscal year 1997 funds for projects which assist Native
Americans to assure the survival and continuing vitality of their
languages. Approximately $1 million of financial assistance is
anticipated to be available under this competitive area.
For Category I, Planning Grants, the funding level for a budget
period of 12 months will be up to $50,000. For Category II, Design and/
or Implementation Grants, the funding level for a budget period of 12
months will be up to $125,000.
B. Background
The Congress has recognized that the history of past policies of
the United States toward Indian and other Native American languages has
resulted in a dramatic decrease in the number of Native American
languages that have survived over the past five hundred years.
Consequently, the Native American Languages Act was enacted in 1990
(Title I, Public Law 101-477) to address this decline.
This Act invested the United States government with the
responsibility to work together with Native Americans to ensure the
survival of cultures and languages unique to Native America. This law
declares that it is the policy of the United States to ``preserve,
protect, and promote the rights and freedom of Native Americans to use,
practice, and develop Native American languages.'' The Congress made a
significant first step in passing this legislation in 1990, but it
served only as a declaration of policy. No program initiatives were
proposed, nor were funds authorized to begin a significant program to
carry out this policy.
In 1992, Congressional testimony highlighted that of the several
hundred Native American languages that once existed, only about 155
languages are still spoken or remembered today. However, only 20 are
spoken by persons of all ages, 30 are spoken by adults of all ages,
about 60 are spoken by middle-aged adults, and 45 are spoken only by
the most elderly.
In response to this testimony, the Congress passed the Native
American Languages Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-524) to assist Indian
tribes, Alaska villages, and Native American groups to assure the
survival and continuing vitality of their languages. Passage of this
law is an important second step to support the survival and
continuation of Native American languages. It provides a basic building
block foundation upon which Tribal nations can rebuild economic
strength and maintain rich cultural diversity.
The Federal government recognizes that substantial loss of Native
American languages has occurred over the past several hundred years.
The nature and magnitude of the status of Native American languages
will become better defined as language assessments are made.
The Administration for Native Americans (ANA) believes that
responsibility for achieving language(s) project results rests with the
governing bodies of Indian tribes, Alaska Native villages, and in the
leadership of Native American groups. The local community and its
leadership are responsible for determining its own goals, setting
priorities, and planning and implementing programs which support the
community's long-range language goals.
Preserving a language and ensuring its continuation is generally
one of the first steps taken toward strengthening a group's identity.
Therefore, projects proposed under this program announcement will
contribute to the balanced development in a native community and can
significantly contribute to its path toward self-sufficiency.
Under this competitive area eligible applicants will have the
opportunity to develop their own language plans, increase their
technical capabilities, and have access to financial and technical
resources in order to assess, plan, develop and implement programs to
address the survival and continuing vitality of their languages. ANA
recognizes that potential applicants may have various levels of
specialized knowledge and capabilities to address their specific
language concerns. This competitive area is designed to take into
account these special needs and circumstances.
``Language preservation'' is the maintenance of a language so that
it will not decline into non-use.
``Language vitality'' is the active use of a language in a wide
range of domains of human life.
``Language replication'' is defined as the application of a
language program model developed in one community to other
linguistically similar communities.
``Language survival'' is defined as the maintenance and
continuation of language from one generation to another in a wide range
of aspects of community life.
C. Proposed Projects to be Funded
There are two types of projects applicants may apply for:
Category I--``Planning Grants''--for projects up to 12
months, the funding level will be up to $50,000 or,
Category II--``Design and/or Implementation Grants''--for
projects up to 36 months, the funding level for a budget period of 12
months will be up to $125,000.
Category I--Planning Grants
The purpose of a Planning Grant is to conduct an assessment and to
develop the plan needed to describe the current status of the
language(s) to be addressed
[[Page 44132]]
and to establish community long-range language goal(s) to ensure its
survival.
Project activities may include, but are not limited to:
To collect data, organize it, and determine and describe
current language status through a ``formal'' method (e.g., work
performed by a linguist, and/or a language survey conducted by
community members) or an ``informal'' method (e.g., a community
consensus of the language status based on elders, tribal scholars, and/
or other community members);
To establish the community's long-range language goals;
and
To get the necessary training and technical assistance to
administer the project and achieve the project goal(s).
Category II--Design and/or Implementation Grants
The purpose of providing an option for a Design and/or an
Implementation Grant is:
Option One: So tribes or communities can design and/or implement a
language program to achieve the community's long-range language
goal(s); and
Option Two: To accommodate where the Tribe or community is in their
long-term language(s) goals continuum.
Applicants under Category II must be able to document that:
(a) Language information has been collected and analyzed, and that
it is current (compiled within 36 months prior to the grant
application);
(b) The community has established long-range language goals; and
(c) Community representatives are adequately trained so that the
proposed project goals can be achieved.
Category II applications may include purchasing specialized
equipment (including audio and video recording equipment, computers,
and software) necessary to achieve the project objectives. The
applicant must fully justify the need for this equipment and explain
how it will be used to achieve the project objectives.
The types of projects and activities ANA can fund under Category II
include, but are not limited to:
Establishment and support of a community Native American
language project to bring older and younger Native Americans together
to facilitate and encourage the teaching of Native American languages
skills from one generation to another;
Establishment of a project to train Native Americans to
teach Native American languages to others or to enable them to serve as
interpreters or translators of such languages;
Development, printing, and dissemination of materials to
be used for the teaching and enhancement of Native American languages;
Establishment or support of a project to train Native
Americans to produce or participate in television or radio programs to
be broadcast in Native American languages; and
Compilation, transcription, and analysis of oral testimony
to record and preserve Native American languages.
Policy
It is ANA's policy that funds will not be awarded for projects
addressing dead languages.
Requirement
The Institute of American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts
Development has been established by the Act, or an alternative
repository as determined by the Commissioner, shall be the repository
for copies of products from Native American languages grants funded
under this program announcement. At the end of the project period,
products or project models of Native American languages grants funded
by this program announcement should be sent to the designated
repository. Specific information about the repository is in the ANA
application kit.
Federally recognized Indian Tribes are not required to comply with
this requirement.
D. Eligible Applicants
The following organizations are eligible to apply for funding under
this competitive area:
Federally recognized Indian Tribes;
Consortia of Indian Tribes;
Incorporated non-Federally recognized Tribes;
Incorporated nonprofit multi-purpose community-based
Indian organizations;
Urban Indian Centers;
National or regional incorporated nonprofit Native
American organizations with Native American community-specific
objectives;
Alaska Native villages as defined in the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) and/or nonprofit village consortia;
Incorporated nonprofit Alaska Native multi-purpose
community-based organizations;
Nonprofit Alaska Native Regional Corporations/Associations
in Alaska with village specific projects;
Nonprofit Native organizations in Alaska with village
specific projects;
Public and nonprofit private agencies serving Native
Hawaiians;
Public and nonprofit private agencies serving native
peoples from Guam, American Samoa, Palau, or the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands. (The populations served may be located on
these islands or in the United States); and
Tribally Controlled Community Colleges, Tribally
Controlled Post-Secondary Vocational Institutions, and colleges and
universities located in Hawaii, Guam, American Samoa, Palau, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands which serve Native
American Pacific Islanders.
Participating Organizations
If a tribal organization, or other eligible applicant, decides that
the objectives of its proposed Native American language project would
be accomplished more effectively through a partnership arrangement with
a tribal school, college, or university, the applicant shall identify
such school, college, or university as a participating organization in
its application. Under a partnership agreement, the applicant will be
responsible for the fiscal, administrative and programmatic management
of the grant.
Proof of an applicant's nonprofit status, such as an IRS
determination of nonprofit status under IRS Code 501(c)(3), must be
included in the application.
If the applicant, other than a tribe or an Alaska Native Village
government, is proposing a project benefiting Native Americans or
Native Alaskans, or both, it must provide assurance that its duly
elected or appointed board of directors is representative of the
community to be served. An organization can conclusively establish that
it meets this requirement through a signed statement or resolution
stating that its duly elected or appointed board of directors are
either Native Americans or Native Alaskans or a copy of the
organizational charter or by-laws that clearly states that the
organization has a board drawn from members of those groups.
Under each competitive area, ANA will only accept one application
which serves or impacts a reservation, Tribe or Native American
community. If a Tribe or Alaska Native village chooses not to submit an
application under a specific competitive area, it may support another
applicant's project (e.g., a tribal organization) which serves or
impacts the reservation.
In this case, the applicant must include a Tribal resolution which
clearly demonstrates the Tribe's support of the project and the Tribe's
understanding that the other applicant's project supplants the Tribe's
authority to submit an application under that
[[Page 44133]]
specific competitive area for the duration of the approved grant
period.
E. Grantee Share of the Project
Grantees must provide at least 20 percent of the total approved
cost of the project. The total approved cost of the project is the sum
of the ACF share and the non-Federal share. The non-Federal share may
be met by cash or in-kind contributions; although applicants are
encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions.
Therefore, a project requesting $125,000 in Federal funds must include
a match of at least $31,250 (20% total project cost).
As per 45 CFR part 74.2, In-Kind contributions is defined as ``the
value of non-cash contributions provided by non-Federal third parties.
Third party-in kind contributions may be in the form of real property,
equipment, supplies and other expendable property, and the value of
goods and services directly benefiting and specifically identifiable to
the project or program.''
In addition the non-Federal share may include certain funds
distributed to a tribe, including interest, by the Federal government:
Funds from the satisfaction of a claim made under Federal
law;
Funds collected and administered on behalf of such tribe
or its constituent members; or
Funds for general tribal administration or tribal
development under a formula or subject to a tribal budgeting priority
system, such as, but not limited to, funds involved in the settlement
of land or other judgment claims, severance or other royalty payments,
or payments under the Indian Self-Determination Act (25 U.S.C. 450f et
seq.) or tribal budget priority system.
A complete itemized budget must also detail the applicant's non-
Federal share, and its source.
If an applicant plans to charge indirect costs in its ANA
application, a current copy of its Indirect Cost Agreement must be
included in the application.
A request for a waiver of the non-Federal share requirement may be
submitted in accordance with 45 CFR 1336.50(b)(3) of the Native
American Program Regulations.
Applications submitted as a partnership arrangement with a school,
college, or university, may use contributions from the ``partner''
organization(s) to meet the non-Federal share, as appropriate.
Applications originating from American Samoa, Guam, Palau, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands are covered under section
501(d) of Public Law 95-134, as amended (48 U.S.C. 1469a) under which
HHS waives any requirement for local matching funds under $200,000
(including in-kind contributions).
F. Review Criteria
The proposed project should address the Native American languages
purposes stated and described in the Background (Section B) of this
competitive area.
Planning grant applications may not have all the information
requested about their current language status, since obtaining this
data may be part of the planning grant application being submitted.
The evaluation criteria below are closely inter-related. They are
considered as a whole in judging the overall quality of an application.
Points are awarded only to applications which respond to this
competitive area and to these criteria. Proposed projects will be
reviewed on a competitive basis using the following evaluation
criteria:
(1) The Current Status of Native American Language(s) is Described
and Description(s) of Existing Programs/Projects (if any) Which Support
the Language(s) are Included. (10 points)
(a) The application fully describes the current status of the
Native American language(s) in the community. (``Current status'' is
defined as data compiled within the previous 36 months.) Applicants
applying for Category I--Planning grants can meet their current
language status by providing a detailed description of any
circumstances or barriers which have prevented the collection of
community language data.
The description of ``current status'' minimally includes the
following information:
(1) Number of speakers of the language(s);
(2) Age of speakers;
(3) Gender of speakers;
(4) Level(s) of fluency;
(5) Number of first language speakers (the Native language is the
first language acquired);
(6) Number of second language speakers (the Native language is the
second language acquired);
(7) Where the language is used (specific uses such as: home, court
system, religious ceremonies, church, multimedia, school, governance
activities and other, as appropriate to applicant);
(8) Source of data; (formal and/or informal); and
(9) Rate of language loss or gain.
The application has clearly described the current status of the
Native American language(s) to be addressed by the project.
Note: Planning Grant applicants may not have all the information
requested about their current language status, since obtaining this
data may be part of the planning grant application being reviewed.
Applicants applying for Category I--Planning Grants can meet this
requirement by explaining their current language status and
providing a detailed description of any circumstances or barriers
which have prevented the collection of community language data.
(b) The application fully describes existing community language or
language training programs and projects, if any, that support the
Native American language to be addressed by the proposed project.
Existing programs and projects may be ``formal'' (e.g., work
performed by a linguist, and/or a language survey conducted by
community members) or ``informal'' (e.g., a community consensus of the
language status based on elders, tribal scholars, and/or other
community members).
The description should answer the following:
(1) Has applicant had a community language or language training
program within the last 36 months?
(2) Has applicant had a community language or language training
program within the last 10 years?
Applicants that answer ``no'' to either question (1) or (2) should
provide a detailed explanation of what barriers or circumstances
prevented the establishment or implementation of a community language
program.
Applicants that answer ``yes'' to either questions (1) or (2)
should describe recent language program(s), including:
(1) Program goal(s);
(2) Number of program participants;
(3) Number of speakers;
(4) Age range of participants (e.g., 0-5; 6-10; 11-18;, etc.);
(5) Number of language teachers;
(6) Criteria used to acknowledge competency of language teachers;
(7) Resources available, if any, to the applicant (e.g., valid
grammars, dictionaries, and/or orthographics or describe other suitable
resources); and
(8) What has been achieved.
(2) Long-Range Goals and Available Resources. (25 points)
(a) The application describes the proposed project's long-range
goal(s) and strategy, including:
how the specific Native American(s) long range community
goal(s) relate to the proposed project;
how the goals fit within the context of the applicant's
current language status; and
a clearly delineated strategy to assist in assuring the
survival and
[[Page 44134]]
continued vitality of the Native American language(s) addressed in the
community.
(b) The application explains how the community or tribal government
(where one exists) intends to achieve these goals.
The application documents the type of involvement and support of
the community in the planning process and implementation of the
proposed project. A Tribe may meet this requirement by submitting a
resolution stating that community involvement has occurred in the
project planning. All other eligible applicants may meet this
requirement by providing documentation of community support/
involvement. The type of community served will determine the type of
documentation necessary.
For example, a tribal organization may submit resolutions
supporting the project proposal from each of its member's tribes, as
well as a resolution from the applicant organization. Other examples of
documentation include: community surveys; minutes of community
meetings; questionnaires; tribal presentations; and/or discussion/
position papers.
Applications from National Indian and Native organizations must
clearly demonstrate a need for the project, explain how the project was
originated, state who the intended beneficiaries will be, and describe
how the recipients will actually benefit from the project. National
Indian and Native organizations should describe their membership and
define how the organization operates.
(c) Available resources (other than ANA and the non-Federal share)
which will assist and be coordinated with the project are described.
These resources should be documented by letters or documents of
commitment of resources, and not ``letters of support.''
``Letters of support'' merely express another
organization's endorsement of a proposed project. Support letters are
not binding commitment letters or documents that factually establish
the authenticity of other resources.
``Letters and other documents of commitment'' are binding
and specifically state the nature, amount and conditions under which
another agency or organization will support a project funded with ANA
funds. These resources may be human, natural or financial, and may
include other Federal and non-Federal resources.
Applicant statements that additional funding will be sought from
other specific sources are not considered a binding commitment of
outside resources.
If the applicant proposes to enter into a partnership arrangement
with a school, college, or university, documentation of this commitment
must be included in the application.
Note: Applicants from the Native American Pacific Islands are
not required to provide a 20% match for the non-Federal share if it
is under $200,000 and may not have points reduced for this policy.
They are, however, expected to coordinate non-ANA resources for the
proposed project, as are all ANA applicants.
(3) Project Objectives, Approach and Activities. (25 points)
The proposed objectives in the Objective Work Plan(s) relate to the
competitive area goal to ensure the survival and continuing vitality of
Native American language(s). More specifically, together they will
achieve the Tribe or community's language goals for the proposed
project. If the project is for more than one year, the application
includes Objective Work Plans for each year (budget period) proposed.
Each Objective Work Plan proposed clearly describes:
The Tribal government's, or community's active involvement
in the continuing participation of Native American language speakers;
Measurable or quantifiable results or outcomes;
How they relate to the community's long-range language
goals;
How the project can be accomplished with the available or
expected resources during the project period;
How the main activities will be accomplished;
Who specifically will conduct the activities under each
objective;
For Category I projects, what the next steps may be after
the Planning project is completed; and
For Category II projects, how the project will be
completed, become self-sustaining, or be financed by other than ANA
funds at the end of the project period.
(4) Evaluation Plan. (15 points)
A section of the application includes an ``Evaluation Plan'' with a
baseline to measure project outcomes, including, but not limited to,
describing effective language growth in the community (e.g., an
increase of Native American language use). This plan will be the basis
for evaluating the community's progress in achieving its language goals
and objectives.
(5) Sharing Plan and Plan to Preserve Project Products (10 points).
A section of the application includes two plans:
(a) A Sharing Plan that identifies how the project's methodology,
research data, outcomes or other products can be shared and used or
modified, by other tribes or communities. If this is not feasible or
culturally appropriate, provide the reasons. The goal is to provide
opportunities to ensure the survival and continuing vitality of Native
American languages.
(b) A Plan to Preserve Project Products describes how the products
of the project will be preserved through archival or other culturally
appropriate methods, for the benefit of future generations.
(6) Organizational Capabilities/Qualifications and Budget. (15
points)
(a) The management and administrative structure of the applicant is
explained. Evidence of the applicant's ability to manage a project of
the proposed scope is well defined. The application clearly
demonstrates the successful management of projects of similar scope by
the organization and/or by the individuals designated to manage the
project.
(b) Position descriptions and/or resumes of key personnel,
including those of consultants, are presented. The position
descriptions and/or resumes relate specifically to the staff proposed
in the Approach Page and in the proposed Budget of the application.
Position descriptions very clearly describe the position and its duties
and clearly relate to the personnel staffing required to achieve the
project objectives. Resumes demonstrate that the proposed staff are
qualified to carry out the project activities. Either the position
descriptions or the resumes contain the qualifications, and/or
specialized skills, necessary for overall quality management of the
project. Resumes must be included if individuals have been identified
for positions in the application.
Note: Applicants are strongly encouraged to give preference to
Native Americans in hiring staff and subcontracting services under
an approved ANA grant.
(c) A detailed and fully explained budget is provided for each
budget period requested which:
Justifies each line item, with a well-written
justification, in the budget categories in Section B of the Budget
Information of the application, including the applicant's non-Federal
share and its source;
Includes and justifies sufficient cost and other necessary
details to facilitate the determination of cost allowability and the
relevance of these costs to the proposed project; and
Requests funds which are appropriate and necessary for the
scope of the proposed project.
[[Page 44135]]
Note: (Applicants from the Native American Pacific Islands are
exempt from the $200,000 non-Federal share requirement).
G. Application Due Date
The closing date for submission of applications under this
competitive area is March 21, 1997.
H. For Further Information Contact
Deborah Yatsko, (202) 690-7843, Department of Health and Human
Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration for
Native Americans, 200 Independence Ave., S.W., Room 348-F, Washington,
D.C. 20201-0001.
Part III--General Application Information and Guidance
A. Definitions
Funding areas in this program announcement are based on the
following definitions:
A ``multi-purpose community-based Native American
organization'' is an association and/or corporation whose charter
specifies that the community designates the Board of Directors and/or
officers of the organization through an elective procedure and that the
organization functions in several different areas of concern to the
members of the local Native American community. These areas are
specified in the by-laws and/or policies adopted by the organization.
They may include, but need not be limited to, economic, artistic,
cultural, and recreational activities, and the delivery of human
services such as health care, day care, counseling, education, and
training.
A ``multi-year project'' is a project on a single theme
that requires more than 12 months to complete and affords the applicant
an opportunity to develop and address more complex and in-depth
strategies than can be completed in one year. A multi-year project
cannot be a series of unrelated objectives with activities presented in
chronological order over a two or three year period.
``Budget Period'' is the interval of time (usually 12
months) into which the project period is divided for budgetary and
funding purposes.
``Core administration'' is funding for staff salaries for
those functions which support the organization as a whole, or for
purposes unrelated to the actual management or implementation of work
conducted under an ANA approved project.
``Environmental regulatory enhancement'' includes (but is
not limited to) the planning, development, and application of laws,
training, monitoring, and enforcement procedures, tribal courts,
environmental laboratories and other facilities, and associated
regulatory activities to strengthen the tribal government's capacity to
enhance the quality of reservation life as measured by the reduction of
pollutants in the air, water, soil, food and materials encountered by
inhabitants of tribes and villages.
``Language preservation'' is the maintenance of a language
so that it will not decline into non-use.
``Language vitality'' is the active use of a language in a
wide range of domains of human life.
``Language replication'' is the application of a language
program model developed in one community to other linguistically
similar communities.
``Language survival'' is the maintenance and continuation
of language from one generation to another in a wide range of aspects
of community life.
B. General Considerations
Non-ANA resources should be leveraged to strengthen and broaden the
impact of the proposed project in the community. Project designs should
explain how those parts of projects which ANA does not fund will be
financed through other sources. For example, ANA does not fund
construction. Applicants must show the relationship of non-ANA funded
activities to those objectives and activities that are funded with ANA
grant funds.
Costs of fundraising, including financial campaigns, endowment
drives, solicitation of gifts and bequests, and similar expenses
incurred solely to raise capital or obtain contributions are
unallowable under a grant award. However, even though these costs are
unallowable for purposes of computing charges to Federal awards, they
must be treated as direct costs for purposes of determining indirect
cost rates and be allocated their share of the organization's indirect
costs if they represent activities which (1) include the salaries of
personnel, (2) occupy space, and (3) benefit from the organization's
indirect costs.
All projects funded by ANA must be completed, or self-sustaining or
supported with other than ANA funds at the end of the project period.
``Completed'' means that the project ANA funded is finished, and the
desired result(s) have been attained. ``Self-sustaining'' means that a
project will continue without outside resources. ``Supported by other
than ANA funds'' means that the project will continue beyond the ANA
project period, but will be supported by funds other than ANA's.
C. Activities That Cannot be Funded by ANA
The Administration for Native Americans does not fund projects that
operate indefinitely or require ANA funding on a recurring basis. The
Administration for Native Americans does not fund objectives or
activities for the core administration of an organization. ``Core
administration'' is funding for staff salaries for those functions
which support the organization as a whole, or for purposes unrelated to
the actual management or implementation of work conducted under an ANA
approved project.
Under Competitive Area 2, ANA will consider funding core
administrative capacity building projects at the village government
level if the village does not have governing systems in place.
However, functions and activities that are clearly project related
are eligible for grant funding. For example, the management and
administrative functions necessary to carry out an ANA approved project
are not considered ``core administration'' and are, therefore, eligible
costs. Additionally, ANA will fund the salaries of approved staff for
time actually and reasonably spent to implement a funded ANA project.
Projects or activities that generally will not meet the purposes of
this announcement are discussed further in Part III, Section H, General
Guidance to Applicants, below.
D. Multi-Year Projects
Applicants may apply for projects of up to three years. A multi-
year project is a project on a single theme that requires more than 12
months to complete and affords the applicant an opportunity to develop
and address more complex and in-depth strategies than can be completed
in one year. Applicants are encouraged to develop multi-year projects.
A multi-year project cannot be a series of unrelated objectives with
activities presented in chronological order over a two or three year
period.
Awards, on a competitive basis, will be for a one-year budget
period, although project periods may be for three years. Applications
for continuation grants funded under these awards beyond the one-year
budget period, but within the three-year project period, will be
entertained in subsequent years on a non-competitive basis, subject to
the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the grantee and
determination that
[[Page 44136]]
continued funding would be in the best interest of the Government.
Therefore, this program announcement does not apply to current ANA
grantees with multi-year projects that apply for continuation funding
for their second or third year budget periods.
E. Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs
This program is not covered by Executive Order 12372 or 45 C.F.R.
Part 100.
F. The Application Process
1. Availability of Application Forms
In order to be considered for a grant under this program
announcement, an application must be submitted on the forms supplied
and in the manner prescribed by ANA. The application kits containing
the necessary forms and instructions may be obtained from: Department
of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families,
Administration for Native Americans, Room 348F, Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20201-0001,
Attention: 93612-971, Telephone: (202) 690-7776.
2. Application Submission
One signed original, and two copies, of the grant application,
including all attachments, must be mailed on or before the specific
closing date of each ANA competitive area to: Department of Health and
Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Division of
Discretionary Grants, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Mail Stop 6C-462,
Washington, D.C. 20447, Attention: William J. McCarron, ANA No. 93612-
971.
Hand delivered applications are accepted during the normal working
hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, on or prior to
the established closing date at: Administration for Children and
Families, Division of Discretionary Grants, Aerospace Center, ACF Mail
Room, Second Floor Loading Dock, 901 D Street, S.W., Washington, D.C.
20024.
The application (Form 424) must be signed by an individual
authorized (1) to act for the applicant tribe or organization, and (2)
to assume the applicant's obligations under the terms and conditions of
the grant award, including Native American Program statutory and
regulatory requirements.
Each tribe, Native American organization, or other eligible
applicant may compete and receive a grant award in each of the three
competitive areas under this announcement. The Administration for
Native Americans will accept only one application per competitive area
from any one applicant. Alaska Native entities may submit a SEDS
application under either competitive area 1 or 2, but not under both.
If an eligible applicant sends in two applications for the same
competitive area, the one with the earlier postmark will be accepted
for review unless the applicant withdraws the earlier application.
3. Application Consideration
The ANA Commissioner determines the final action to be taken on
each grant application received under this program announcement.
The following points should be taken into consideration by all
applicants:
Incomplete applications and applications that do not
conform to this announcement will not be accepted for review.
Applicants will be notified in writing of any such determination by
ANA.
Complete applications that conform to all the requirements
of this program announcement are subjected to a competitive review and
evaluation process (discussed in section G below). Independent review
panels consisting of reviewers familiar with (1) American Indian Tribes
and Native American communities and organizations, (2) environmental
issues, and (3) Native American languages, as appropriate, evaluates
each application using the published criteria in each funding
competitive area. As a result of the review, a numerical score will be
assigned to each application.
The Commissioner's funding decision is based on the review
panel's analysis of the application, recommendation and comments of ANA
staff, State and Federal agencies having contract and grant performance
related information, and other interested parties.
The Commissioner makes grant awards consistent with the
purpose of the Act, all relevant statutory and regulatory requirements,
this program announcement, and the availability of funds.
After the Commissioner has made decisions on all
applications, unsuccessful applicants are notified in writing within
approximately 120 days of the closing date. The notification will be
accompanied by a critique including recommendations for improving the
application. Successful applicants are notified through an official
Financial Assistance Award (FAA) document. ANA staff cannot respond to
requests for information regarding funding decisions prior to the
official notification to the applicants. The FAA will state the amount
of Federal funds awarded, the purpose of the grant, the terms and
conditions of the grant award, the effective date of the award, the
project period, the budget period, and the amount of the non-ACF
matching share requirement.
G. The Review Process
1. Initial Application Review
Applications submitted by the closing date and verified by the
postmark under this program announcement will undergo a pre-review to
determine that:
The applicant is eligible in accordance with the Eligible
Applicants Section of this announcement; and
The application narrative, forms and materials submitted
are adequate to allow the review panel to undertake an in depth
evaluation. (All required materials and forms are listed in the Grant
Application Checklist in the Application Kit).
2. Competitive Review of Accepted Applications
Applications which pass the pre-review will be evaluated and rated
by an independent review panel on the basis of the specific evaluation
criteria listed in Part II. These criteria are used to evaluate the
quality of a proposed project, and to determine the likelihood of its
success.
3. Determination of Ineligibility
Applicants who are initially rejected from competitive evaluation
because of ineligibility, may appeal an ANA decision of applicant
ineligibility. Likewise, applicants may also appeal an ANA decision
that an applicant's proposed activities are ineligible for funding
consideration. The appeals process is stated in the final rule
published in the Federal Register on August 19, 1996 (61 FR 42817).
H. General Guidance to Applicants
The following information is provided to assist applicants in
developing a competitive application.
1. Program Guidance
The Administration for Native Americans funds projects
that demonstrate the strongest prospects for addressing the stated
purposes of this program announcement. Projects will not be funded on
the basis of need alone.
In discussing the goals, strategy, and problems being
addressed in the application, include sufficient background and/or
history of the community concerning these issues and/or progress to
date, as well as the
[[Page 44137]]
size of the population to be served. This material will assist the
reviewers in determining the appropriateness and potential benefits of
the proposed project.
In the discussion of community-based, long-range goals,
non-Federally recognized and off-reservation groups are encouraged to
include a description of what constitutes their specific ``community.''
Applicants must document the community's support for the
proposed project and explain the role of the community in the planning
process and implementation of the proposed project. For tribes, a
current signed resolution from the governing body of the tribe
supporting the project proposal stating that there has been community
involvement in the planning of this project will suffice as evidence of
community support/involvement. For all other eligible applicants, the
type of community you serve will determine the type of documentation
necessary. For example, a tribal organization may submit resolutions
supporting the project proposal from each of its members tribes, as
well as a resolution from the applicant organization. Other examples of
documentation include: community surveys; minutes of community
meetings; questionnaires; tribal presentations; and/or discussion/
position papers.
Applications from National Indian and Native American
organizations must demonstrate a need for the project, explain how the
project was originated, state who the intended beneficiaries will be,
and describe how the recipients will actually benefit from the project.
An application should describe a clear relationship
between the proposed project, the social and economic development
strategy, or environmental or language goals, as appropriate, and the
community's long-range goals or plan.
The project application, including the Objective Work
Plans, must clearly identify in measurable terms the expected results,
benefits or outcomes of the proposed project, and the positive or
continuing impact that the project will have on the community.
Supporting documentation, including letters of support, if
available, or other testimonies from concerned interests other than the
applicant should be included to demonstrate support for the feasibility
of the project and the commitment of other resources to the proposed
project.
In the ANA Project Narrative, Section A of the application
package, ``Resources Available to the Proposed Project,'' the applicant
should describe any specific financial circumstances which may impact
on the project, such as any monetary or land settlements made to the
applicant, and any restrictions on the use of those settlements. When
the applicant appears to have other resources to support the proposed
project and chooses not to use them, the applicant should explain why
it is seeking ANA funds and not utilizing these resources for the
project.
Reviewers of applications for ANA indicate they are better
able to evaluate whether the feasibility has been addressed and the
practicality of a proposed economic development project, or a new
business, if the applicant includes a business plan that clearly
describes its feasibility and the approach for the implementation and
marketing of the business. (ANA has included sample business plans in
the application kit). It is strongly recommended that an applicant use
these materials as guides in developing a proposal for an economic
development project or business that is part of the application.
Applications which were disapproved under a previous
closing date and revised for resubmission should make reference to the
changes in their current application which are based on ANA panel
review comments.
Technical Guidance
It is strongly suggested that the applicant follow the
Supplemental Guide included in the ANA application kit to develop an
application. The Guide provides practical information and helpful
suggestions, and is an aid to help applicants prepare ANA applications.
Applicants are encouraged to have someone other than the
author apply the evaluation criteria in the program announcement and
score the application prior to its submission, in order to gain a
better sense of the application's quality and potential competitiveness
in the ANA review process.
For purposes of developing an application, applicants
should plan for a project start date approximately 120 days after the
closing date under which the application is submitted.
The Administration for Native Americans will not fund
essentially identical projects serving the same constituency.
If a project could be supported by other Federal funding
sources, the applicant should fully explain its reasons for not
pursuing other Federal funds for the project.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to submit proposals
addressing environmental regulatory enhancement and Native American
languages preservation and enhancement under the issue-specific
competitive areas described in this announcement.
For purposes of this announcement, ANA is using the Bureau
of Indian Affairs' list of Federally recognized Indian tribes which
includes nonprofit Alaska Native community entities or tribal governing
bodies (IRA or traditional councils). Other Federally recognized Indian
tribes which are not included on this list (e.g., those Tribes which
have been recently recognized or restored by the United States
Congress) are also eligible to apply for ANA funds.
The Administration for Native Americans will accept only
one application, per competitive area, from any one applicant. If an
eligible applicant sends in two applications for the same competitive
area, the one with the earlier postmark will be accepted for review
unless the applicant withdraws the earlier application.
An application from a federally recognized Tribe, Alaska
Native Village or Native American organization must be from the
governing body of the Tribe or organization. ANA will not accept
applications from tribal components which are tribally-authorized
divisions of a larger tribe, unless the application includes a Tribal
resolution which clearly demonstrates the Tribe's support of the
project and the Tribe's understanding that the other applicant's
project supplants the Tribe's authority to submit an application under
that specific competitive area for the duration of the approved grant
period.
Under each competitive area, ANA will only accept one
application which serves or impacts a reservation, Tribe, or Native
American community. If a Tribe, or Alaska Native village chooses not to
submit an application under a specific competitive area, it may support
another applicant's project (e.g., a tribal organization) which serves
or impacts the reservation. In this case, the applicant must include a
Tribal resolution which clearly demonstrates the Tribe's support of the
project and the Tribe's understanding that the other applicant's
project supplants the Tribe's authority to submit an application under
that specific competitive area for the duration of the approved grant
period.
The application's Form 424 must be signed by the
applicant's representative authorized to act with full authority on
behalf of the applicant.
The Administration for Native Americans recommends that
the pages of the application be numbered sequentially and that a table
of contents
[[Page 44138]]
be provided. Simple tabbing of the sections of the application is also
helpful to the reviewers.
An application with an original signature and two
additional copies are required.
The Cover Page (included in the Kit) should be the first
page of an application, followed by the one-page abstract.
The Approach page (Section B of the ANA Program Narrative)
for each Objective Work Plan proposed should be of sufficient detail to
become a monthly staff guide for project responsibilities if the
applicant is funded.
The applicant should specify the entire project period
length on the first page of the Form 424, Block 13, not the length of
the first budget period. Should the application's contents propose one
length of project period and the Form 424 specify a conflicting length
of project period, ANA will consider the project period specified on
the Form 424 as governing.
Line 15a of the Form 424 must specify the Federal funds
requested for the first Budget Period, not the entire project period.
If a profit-making venture is being proposed, profits must
be reinvested in the business in order to decrease or eliminate ANA's
future participation. Such revenue must be reported as general program
income. A decision will be made at the time of grant award regarding
appropriate use of program income. (See 45 CFR part 74 and part 92.)
Applicants may propose a 17 month project period. However,
the project period for the first year of a multi-year project may only
be 12 months.
Applicants proposing multi-year projects must fully
describe each year's project objectives and activities. Separate
Objective Work Plans (OWPs) must be presented for each project year and
a separate itemized budget of the Federal and non-Federal costs of the
project for each budget period must be included.
Applicants for multi-year projects must justify the entire
time-frame of the project (i.e., why the project needs funding for more
than one year) and clearly describe the results to be achieved for each
objective by the end of each budget period of the total project period.
The Administration for Native Americans will critically
evaluate applications in which the acquisition of equipment is a major
component of the Federal share of the budget. ``Equipment is tangible,
non-expendable personal property having a useful life of more than one
year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit.'' During
negotiation, such expenditures may be deleted from the budget of an
otherwise approved application, if not fully justified by the applicant
and not deemed appropriate to the needs of the project by ANA.
Applicants are encouraged to request a legibly dated
receipt from a commercial carrier or U.S. Postal Service as proof of
timely mailing.
3. Projects or Activities That Generally Will Not Meet the Purposes of
This Announcement
Projects in which a grantee would provide training and/or
technical assistance (T/TA) to other tribes or Native American
organizations which are otherwise eligible to apply to ANA (``third
party T/TA''). However, the purchase of T/TA by a grantee for its own
use or for its members' use (as in the case of a consortium), where T/
TA is necessary to carry out project objectives, is acceptable. In
addition, T/TA is an allowable activity for environmental regulatory
enhancement projects submitted under Competitive Area 3, and Native
American languages projects submitted under Competitive Area 4.
Projects that request funds for feasibility studies,
business plans, marketing plans or written materials, such as manuals,
that are not an essential part of the applicant's long-range
development plan. As an objective of a larger project, business plans
are allowable. However, ANA is not interested in funding ``wish lists''
of business possibilities. ANA expects written evidence of the solid
investment of time and consideration on the part of the applicant with
regard to the development of business plans. Business plans should be
developed based on market analysis and feasibility studies regarding
the potential success to the business prior to the submission of the
application.
The support of on-going social service delivery programs
or the expansion, or continuation, of existing social service delivery
programs.
Core administration functions, or other activities, which
essentially support only the applicant's on-going administrative
functions. However, under Competitive Area 2, ANA will consider funding
core administrative capacity building projects at the village
government level if the village does not have governing systems in
place.
Project goals which are not responsive to one or more of
the funding competitive areas.
Proposals from consortia of tribes that are not specific
with regard to support from, and roles of, member tribes. ANA expects
an application from a consortium to have goals and objectives that will
create positive impacts and outcomes in the communities of its members.
Proposals from consortia of tribes should have individual objectives
which are related to the larger goal of the proposed project. Project
objectives may be tailored to each consortia member, but within the
context of a common goal for the consortia. In situations where both a
consortia of tribes and the tribes who belong to the consortia receive
ANA funding, ANA expects that consortia groups will not seek funding
that duplicates activities being conducted by their member tribes.
Projects that will not be completed, self-sustaining, or
supported by other than ANA funds, at the end of the project period.
ANA will not fund the purchase of real estate (see 45 CFR
1336.50 (e)) or construction (see ACF Grants Administration Manual
Sec. 3.12).
ANA will not fund investment capital for purchase or
takeover of an existing business, for purchase or acquisition of a
franchise, or for purchase of stock or other similar investment
instruments.
Renovation or alteration unless it is essential for the
project. Renovation or alteration costs may not exceed the lesser of
$150,000 or 25 percent of the total direct costs approved for the
entire budget period.
Projects originated and designed by consultants who
provide a major role for themselves in the proposed project and are not
members of the applicant organization, tribe or village.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13, the
Department is required to submit to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval any reporting and record keeping
requirements in regulations including program announcements. This
program announcement does not contain information collection
requirements beyond those approved for ANA grant applications under the
Program Narrative Statement by OMB.
J. Receipt of Applications
Applications must either be hand delivered or mailed to the address
in Section F, The Application Process: Application Submission. The
Administration for Native Americans will not accept applications
submitted
[[Page 44139]]
via facsimile (FAX) equipment. Videotapes and cassette tapes may not be
included as part of a grant application for panel review.
1. Deadlines
Applications mailed through the U.S. Postal Service or a commercial
delivery service shall be considered as meeting an announced closing
date if they are either:
Received on or before the deadline date at the address
specified in Section F2, Application Submission; or
Sent on, or before, the deadline date and received in time
for the ANA independent review. (Applicants are cautioned to request a
legibly dated receipt from a commercial carrier or U.S. Postal Service
or a legible postmark date from the U.S. Postal Service. Private
metered postmarks shall not be acceptable as proof of timely mailing.)
No additional material will be accepted, or added to an
application, unless it is postmarked by the deadline date.
2. Late applications
Applications which do not meet the criteria in the above paragraph
of this section are considered late applications and will be returned
to the applicant. The Administration for Children and Families shall
notify each late applicant that its application will not be considered
in the current competition.
3. Extension of Deadlines
The Administration for Children and Families may extend the
deadline for all applicants because of acts of God such as floods,
hurricanes, etc., or when there is a widespread disruption of the
mails. However, if ACF does not extend the deadline for all applicants,
it may not waive or extend the deadline for any applicant.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.612
Native American Programs; 93.581 Improving the Capability of Indian
Tribal Governments to Regulate Environmental Quality; and 93.587
Promoting the Survival and Continuing Vitality of Native American
Languages.)
Dated: August 21, 1996.
Gary N. Kimble,
Commissioner, Administration for Native Americans.
[FR Doc. 96-21712 Filed 8-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.