Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, Placer County Air Pollution Control District, El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, and Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 095-0006a; FRL-5454-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California

State Implementation Plan Revision, Placer County Air Pollution Control

District, El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District, Ventura

County Air Pollution Control District, Yolo-Solano Air Quality

Management District, and Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the

California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions concern rules

from the following districts: Placer County Air Pollution Control

District (PLCAPCD), El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District

(EDCAPCD), Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VTCAPCD),

Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD), and Mojave Desert

Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD). This approval action will

incorporate these rules into the federally approved SIP. The intended

effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of volatile

organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the

Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). The revised rules

control VOC emissions from automotive refinishing, solvent cleaning and

degreasing, wood coating and graphic arts operations. Thus, EPA is

finalizing the approval of these revisions into the California SIP

under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on SIP submittal, SIPs

for national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards and

plan requirements for nonattainment areas.

DATES: This action is effective on July 1, 1996, unless adverse or

critical comments are received by May 30, 1996. If the effective date

is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's evaluation report for

each rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office

during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted

[[Page 18963]]

rule revisions are available for inspection at the following locations:

Rulemaking Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105

Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M''

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460

California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812-2815

Placer County Air Pollution Control District, 11464 B Avenue,

Auburn, CA 95603

El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District, 2850 Fairlane

Court, Placerville, CA 95667

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 669 County Square

Drive, Ventura, CA 93003

Yolo Solano Air Quality Management District, 1947 Galileo Court,

Suite 103, Davis, CA 95616

Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, 15428 Civic Drive,

Suite 200, Victorville, CA 92392-2383

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel A. Meer, Chief Rulemaking

Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901,

Telephone: (415) 744-1185

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Applicability

The rules being approved into the California SIP include: PLCAPCD's

Rule 216, Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, and Rule

236, Wood Products Coating Operations; EDCAPCD's Rule 225, Organic

Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, Rule 230, Motor Vehicle and

Mobile Equipment Coating Operations and Rule 235, Surface Preparation

and Cleanup; VTCAPCD's Rule 74.18 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment

Coating Operations and Rule 74.30, Wood Products Coatings; YSAQMD's

Rule 2.13, Organic Solvents and Rule 2.26, Motor Vehicle and Mobile

Equipment Coating Operations; MDAQMD's Rule 1104, Organic Solvent

Degreasing Operations, Rule 1114, Wood Products Coating Operations and

Rule 1117, Graphic Arts. These rules were submitted by the California

Air Resources Board (CARB) to EPA on July 13, 1994 (Rules 74.30 and

1117), November 30, 1994 (Rules 225, 230, 1104, and 2.13), February 24,

1995 (Rule 74.18 and 2.26), March 31, 1995 (Rule 1114), May 24, 1995

(Rule 236) and October 13, 1995 (Rules 216 and 235).

Background

On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment

areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977

(1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included Ventura County, part of

the Southeast Desert Air Basin, and the Sacramento Metro area, which

includes portions of Placer, Yolo, and El Dorado County. See 43 FR

8964, 40 CFR 81.305. On May 26, 1988, EPA notified the Governor of

California, pursuant to section 110(a)(2)(H) of the 1977 Act, that the

PLCAPCD, EDCAPCD, VTCAPCD, YSAQMD and the MDAQMD portions of the

California SIP were inadequate to attain and maintain the ozone

standard and requested that deficiencies in the existing SIP be

corrected (EPA's SIP-Call). On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act

Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399,

codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. In amended section 182 of the CAA,

Congress statutorily adopted the requirements that nonattainment areas

both fix their deficient reasonably available control technology (RACT)

rules for ozone and submit RACT rules for other stationary sources of

VOCs (the RACT fix-up and catch-up requirements). Congress established

a deadline of May 15, 1991 for States to submit corrections to

deficient rules and a deadline of November 15, 1992 for States to

submit rules for other VOC source categories.

Section 182 applies to areas designated as nonattainment prior to

enactment of the amendments and classified as marginal or above as of

the date of enactment. It requires such areas to adopt and correct RACT

rules pursuant to pre-amended section 172 (b) as interpreted in pre-

amendment guidance.1 EPA's SIP-Call used that guidance to indicate

the necessary corrections for specific nonattainment areas. Ventura

County, a portion of the Southeast Desert Air Basin, the Sacramento

Metro area, which includes portions of Placer, Yolo and El Dorado

County are classified as severe;2 therefore, these areas were

subject to the RACT fix-up and catch-up requirements and the deadlines

cited above.3

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ Among other things, the pre-amendment guidance consists of

those portions of the proposed post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide

policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987); ``Issues

Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,

Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register

Notice'' (Blue Book) (notice of availability was published in the

Federal Register on May 25, 1988); and the existing control

technique guidelines (CTGs).

\2\ Ventura County and a portion of the Southeast Desert Air

Basin retained their designation of nonattainment and were

classified by operation of law pursuant to sections 107(d) and

181(a) upon the date of enactment of the CAA. See 55 FR 56694

(November 6, 1991). The Sacramento Metro Area was reclassified from

serious to severe on June 1, 1995. See 60 FR 20237 (April 25, 1995)

\3\ California did not make the required SIP submittal for

Mojave Desert AQMD's Rule 1104, Graphic Arts, by November 15, 1992.

On January 15, 1993, the EPA made a finding of failure to make a

submittal pursuant to section 179(a)(1), which started an 18 month

sanction clock. The rule being acted on in this direct final rule

was submitted in response to the EPA finding of failure to submit.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The State of California submitted many revised RACT rules for

incorporation into its SIP on July 13, 1994, November 30, 1994,

February 24, 1995, March 31, 1995, May 24, 1995, and October 13, 1995,

including the rules being acted on in this document. This document

addresses EPA's direct-final action for PLCAPCD's Rule 216, Organic

Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, and 236, Wood Products

Coating Operations; EDCAPCD's Rules 225, Organic Solvent Cleaning and

Degreasing Operations, 230, Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating

Operations, and 235, Surface Preparation and Cleanup; VTCAPCD's Rules

74.18 Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, and 74.30,

Wood Products Coatings; YSAQMD's Rules 2.13, Organic Solvents, and

2.26, Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations; MDAQMD's

Rules 1104, Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations, 1114, Wood Products

Coating Operations and 1117, Graphic Arts. These submitted rules were

found to be complete on July 22, 1994 (1117), September 12, 1994

(74.30), January 3, 1995 (1104), January 30, 1995 (2.13, 225, and 230),

March 10, 1995 (74.18, 2.26,), May 2, 1995 (1114), July 24, 1995 (236),

and November 28, 1995 (216, 235) pursuant to EPA's completeness

criteria that are set forth in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V 4 and are

being finalized for approval into the SIP.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ EPA adopted the completeness criteria on February 16, 1990

(55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA,

revised the criteria on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VTCAPCD's Rule 74.18, EDCAPCD's Rule 230, and YSAQMD's Rule 2.26

control emissions of VOCs from refinishing of motor vehicles and mobile

equipment, YSAQMD's Rule 2.13 controls emissions of VOCs from the usage

of organic solvents, EDCAPCD's Rule 235 controls emissions of VOCs from

surface preparation and cleanup using organic solvents, EDAPCD's Rule

225, PLCAPCD's Rule 216 and MDAQMD's Rule 1104 control emissions of

VOCs from organic solvent degreasing operations, PLCAPCD's Rule 236,

MDAQMD's Rule 1114 and VTCAPCD's Rule 74.30 control emissions of VOCs

from coating of wood products and MDAQMD's Rule 1117

[[Page 18964]]

controls emissions of VOCs from graphic arts operations. VOCs

contribute to the production of ground level ozone and smog. These

rules were originally adopted by the respective districts as part of

their effort to achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standard

(NAAQS) for ozone and in response to EPA's SIP-Call and the section

182(a)(2)(A) CAA requirement. The following is EPA's evaluation and

final action for these rules.

EPA Evaluation and Action

In determining the approvability of a VOC rule, EPA must evaluate

the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA

regulations, as found in section 110 and part D of the CAA and 40 CFR

part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of

Implementation Plans). The EPA interpretation of these requirements,

which forms the basis for today's action, appears in the various EPA

policy guidance documents listed in footnote 1. Among those provisions

is the requirement that a VOC rule must, at a minimum, provide for the

implementation of RACT for stationary sources of VOC emissions. This

requirement was carried forth from the pre-amended Act.

For the purpose of assisting state and local agencies in developing

RACT rules, EPA prepared a series of Control Technique Guideline (CTG)

documents. The CTGs are based on the underlying requirements of the Act

and specify the presumptive norms for what is RACT for specific source

categories. Under the CAA, Congress ratified EPA's use of these

documents, as well as other Agency policy, for requiring States to

``fix-up'' their RACT rules. See section 182(a)(2)(A). The CTG

applicable to EDCAPCD's Rule 225, PLCAPCD's Rule 216 and MDAQMD's Rule

1104 is entitled, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions From Solvent

Metal Cleaning. EPA-450/2-77-022, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, November 1977, and the

CTG applicable to MDAQMD's Rule 1117 is entitled, Control of Volatile

Organic Emissions from Stationary Sources--Volume VIII: Graphic Arts--

Rotogravure and Flexography, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Office of Air Quality And Standards, December 1978, EPA-450/2-78-033.

MDAQMD's Rule 1114 and VTCAPCD's Rule 74.30 limit emissions from a

source category for which EPA has published a draft CTG entitled,

Control Techniques Guideline Document; Wood Furniture Finishing and

Cleaning Operation, see 60 FR 46595, September 7, 1995, which was used

as guidance in the evaluation. VTCAPCD's Rule 74.18, EDCAPCD's Rules

230 and 235, and YSAQMD's Rule 2.26, and 2.13 are applicable to source

categories for which EPA has not published a CTG. Accordingly, these

rules were evaluated against the interpretation of EPA policy found in

the Blue Book, referred to in Footnote 1 and against other EPA policy

including the EPA Region 9/CARB document entitled: Guidance Document

for correcting VOC rule deficiencies, (April 1991). In general, these

guidance documents have been set forth to ensure that VOC rules are

fully enforceable and strengthen or maintain the SIP.

PLCAPCD's submitted Rule 216, Organic Solvent Cleaning and

Degreasing Operations, includes the following significant changes from

the current SIP:

Updated format of rule to be consistent with other

district rules, and to enhance clarity,

Expanded section 200, to include definitions of exempt

compounds, VOCs, leaks, wipe cleaning, stationary source and lip

exhaust,

Regrouped requirements and standards to enhance clarity

and enforceability of the rule,

Revised section 500, to cite test methods that have been

approved by the EPA.

PLCAPCD's submitted Rule 236, Wood Products Coating Operations, is

a new rule containing the following significant provisions:

Limits VOC emissions from coating and surface preparation

of wood products including furniture, cabinets and custom replica

furniture, but exempts application of coatings to wooden musical

instruments, and exempts facilities using less than 20 gallons of

coatings per year,

The rule applies only to facilities located in the

Sacramento Valley Air Basin portion of Placer County.

EDCAPCD'S submitted Rule 225, Organic Solvent Cleaning and

Degreasing Operations, includes the following significant changes from

the current SIP:

Corrected the deficiencies noted in EPA's SIP call of

September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34500)

Incorporates the provisions of the RACT/BARCT

determination developed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

EDCAPCD's submitted Rule 230, Automotive Refinishing Operations, is

a new rule containing the following significant provisions:

Limits the VOC contents of numerous coatings and solvents

utilized in the automotive refinishing industry,

Implements the provisions of RACT/BARCT developed by the

California Air Resources Board,

Requires the use of high efficiency transfer equipment for

the application of all coatings, such as High Volume Low Pressure

(HVLP), electrostatic or other coating application methods having a

transfer efficiency of 65% or greater,

Requires add-on abatement equipment when non-compliant

coatings are being used,

Specifies testmethods for analysis of samples,

determination of emissions, transfer efficiency, capture efficiency,

metallic particle content in metallic coatings and acid concentration

in pretreatment wash primer,

Defines recordkeeping requirements.

EDCAPCD's submitted Rule 235, Surface Preparation and Cleanup is a

new rule containing the following significant provisions:

Limits the emissions of VOCs from solvent cleaning

operations in production, repair, maintenance or servicing of parts,

products, tools, machinery, equipment, or general work areas,

Exempts facilities using less than 10 gallons of solvents

in any one calendar year, provided that the daily use does not exceed

one liter,

Defines cleaning devices and methods to be used when

performing solvent cleaning,

Defines recordkeeping requirements and test methods.

VTCAPCD's Rule 74.18, Motor Vehicles and Mobile Equipment Coatings

Operations, includes the following significant changes from the current

SIP:

Sets the standard for pretreatment wash primer at 780

grams of VOC per liter, and limits the use of this coating to 10% of

all undercoats used, averaged over one month,

Deletes the category of precoat,

Changes the implementation date of the primer sealer VOC

standard to January 1, 1997,

Changes the implementation date of the multistage topcoat

VOC limit to January 1, 1996,

Limits the use of specialty coatings to no more than 5% of

total coating usage.

VTCAPCD's Rule 74.30, Wood Products Coatings, is a new rule

containing the following significant provisions:

Limits the VOC content of coatings applied to wood

products,

Establishes two categories of wood coating operations: new

wood products and refinishing wood products,

[[Page 18965]]

Allows add-on control equipment as an alternative to using

low VOC coatings,

Requires operators of wood coating facilities to use

coating application methods yielding at least 65% transfer efficiency,

Defines the test methods to be used and specifies

recordkeeping provisions.

YSAQMD's Rule 2.13, Organic Solvents, includes the following

changes from the current SIP:

Reformatting of the entire rule,

Added section 101, Purpose

Added section 102, Applicability

Deleted the sections concerning asphalt paving and graphic

arts. These sources are now covered in Rule 2.28 and 2.29 respectively,

Added section 502, test methods.

YSAQMD's Rule 2.26, Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating

Operations, is a new rule containing the following significant

provisions:

Limits the VOC content of coatings applied to group I and

group II vehicles,

Specifies the application method to be used to achieve a

transfer efficiency of 65% or greater,

Limits the VOC contents of surface preparation and clean-

up solvents,

Limits use of specialty coatings to no more than 5% of all

coatings applied, on a monthly basis,

Limits use of precoat to no more than 25%, by volume, of

the amount of primer surfacer used,

Includes a prohibition of specification and sale clause,

Defines test methods to be used and specifies records to

be kept.

MDAQMD's Rule 1104, Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations, is a new

rule containing the following significant provisions:

Limits emissions of VOCs from wipe cleaning and degreasing

operations using organic solvents,

Applies to any facility engaged in wipe cleaning, cold

solvent cleaning (degreasing) operations for metal/non metal parts/

products or electronic circuit boards, which utilize organic solvents,

Defines equipment requirements for remote reservoir

cleaners, cold solvent degreasers, conveyorized cold solvent

degreasers, batch loaded vapor degreasers, and conveyorized vapor

degreasers,

Defines operating requirements for all degreasers in

general, and batch loaded, conveyorized degreasers, and remote

reservoir degreasers specifically,

Provides recordkeeping requirements and specifies test

methods.

MDAQMD's Rule 1114, Wood Products Coating Operations, is a new rule

containing the following significant provisions:

Limits emissions of VOCs from the coating operations of

wood products,

Provides limits of VOC content for topcoats, fillers

stains, inks, mold-seal, multi-colored and pigmented coatings, sealers,

strippers and adhesives.

Defines application methods to be used when applying

coatings to achieve a transfer efficiency of 65% or more,

Defines the VOC limits of clean-up and equipment cleaning

solvents,

Allows the use of add-on control devices to comply with

the rule,

Exempts facilities using less than one gallon of coating

material in any one day, or have maximum actual emissions of 3 lbs of

VOCs per day and not more than 200 lbs of VOCs per calendar year,

Specifies test methods to be used and records to be kept.

MDAQMD's Rule 1117, Graphic Arts, is a new rule containing the

following significant provisions:

Applies to rotogravure and flexographic printing sources,

but exempts facilities that emit less than 2500 pounds of VOC per

month,

Requires sources to maintain daily records of coatings,

inks, and adhesives used by the facility. If an emission control system

is used, the facility must continuously monitor its operating

parameters,

Limits VOC content of inks, coatings, and adhesives to 300

grams per liter of coating as applied,

Defines capture and control efficiency requirements of 75%

by weight for publication rotogravure, of 65% by weight for packaging

rotogravure, and of 60% by weight for flexographic printing,

Defines test methods to be used and records to be kept.

EPA has evaluated the submitted rules and has determined that they

are consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy.

Therefore, PLCAPCD's Rules 216, Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing

Operations, and 236, Wood Products Coating Operations, EDCAPCD's Rules

225, Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, 230, Motor

Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, and 235, Surface

Preparation and Cleanup, VTCAPCD's Rules 74.18, Motor Vehicle and

Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, and 74.30, Wood Products Coating,

YSAQMD's Rules 2.13, Organic Solvents, and 2.26, Motor Vehicles and

Mobile Equipment Coating Operations, and MDAQMD's Rules 1104, Organic

Solvent Degreasing Operations, 1114, Wood Products Coating, and 1114,

Graphic Arts, are being approved under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as

meeting the requirements of section 110(a) and part D.

Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or

allowing or establishing a precedent for any future implementation

plan. Each request for revision to the state implementation plan shall

be considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and

environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and

regulatory requirements.

EPA is publishing this document without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal

Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision

should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be

effective July 1, 1996, unless, by May 30, 1996, adverse or critical

comments are received.

If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn

before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will

withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be

addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a

proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on

this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should

do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is

advised that this action will be effective July 1, 1996.

Regulatory Process

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA

must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of

any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.

Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a

significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small

entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises and

government entities with jurisdiction over population of less than

50,000.

SIP approvals under sections 110 and 301(a) and subchapter I, Part

D of the CAA do not create any new requirements, but simply approve

requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the

Federal SIP-approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify

that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities

affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-state relationship

under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would

[[Page 18966]]

constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state

action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such

grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.

Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a)(2).

Unfunded Mandates

Under Sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform

Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22,

1995, EPA must undertake various actions in association with proposed

or final rules that include a Federal mandate that may result in

estimated costs of $100 million or more to the private sector or to

State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.

Through submission of this state implementation plan or plan

revision, the State and any affected local or tribal governments have

elected to adopt the program provided for under Part D of the Clean Air

Act. These rules may bind State, local, and tribal governments to

perform certain actions and also require the private sector to perform

certain duties. The rules being [proposed for approval/approved] by

this action will impose no new requirements because affected sources

are already subject to these regulations under State law. Therefore, no

additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments or to the

private sector result from this action. EPA has also determined that

this [proposed or final] action does not include a mandate that may

result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to State, local, or

tribal governments in the aggregate or to the private sector.

This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature

by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the

Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a

July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for

Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has

exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation

Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the

Federal Register on July 1, 1982.

Dated: March 26, 1996.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator.

Subpart F of part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal

Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Subpart F--California

2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(198)(i)(E)(2)

and (i)(J)(2), (207)(i)(B)(4), (i)(C)(4) and (i)(D)(2),(215)(i)(B)(3)

and (i)(D)(1), (216)(i)(A)(4), (220)(i)(B)(2) and (225)(i)(B)(5) and

(i)(C)(2) to read as follows:

Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(198) * * *

(i) * * *

(E) * * *

(2) Rule 1117 adopted June 22, 1994.

* * * * *

(J) * * *

(2) Rule 74.30 adopted May 17, 1994.

* * * * *

(207) * * *

(i) * * *

(B) * * *

(4) Rules 225 and 230 adopted September 27, 1994.

(C) * * *

(4) Rule 2.13 adopted May 25, 1994.

(D) * * *

(2) Rule 1104 adopted September 28, 1994.

* * * * *

(215) * * *

(i) * * *

(B) * * *

(3) Rule 74.18 adopted December 13, 1994.

* * * * *

(D) * * *

(1) Rule 2.26 adopted November 9, 1994.

* * * * *

(216) * * *

(i) * * *

(A) * * *

(4) Rule 1114 adopted February 22, 1995.

* * * * *

(220) * * *

(i) * * *

(B) * * *

(2) Rule 236 adopted on February 9, 1995.

* * * * *

(225) * * *

(i) * * *

(B) * * *

(5) Rule 216 adopted on June 8, 1995.

(C) * * *

(2) Rule 235 adopted on June 27, 1995.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 96-10563 Filed 4-29-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-W