Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Federal RegisterFeb 10, 1995
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-4720-2]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared January 9, 1995 through
January 13, 1995 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP),
under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the
National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of
EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at
(202) 260-5076.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 10, 1994 (59
FR 16807).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-NPS-E64015-TN
Rating EC2, Obed Wild and Scenic River, General Management Plan and
Development Concept Plan, Implementation, Morgan and Cumberland
Counties, TN.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about adverse effects
from cumulative impacts from trail expansions and the potential
impairment of the free-flowing condition and resource value of the OBED
WSR. EPA encouraged a basin-wide regional comprehensive water resources
plan be conducted concurrently with the OBED designation.
ERP No. D-NRC-A09822-00
Rating EC2, 10 CFR Part 20: Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for Decommissioning of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities (NUREG-
1496), Implementation, Generic EIS.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with the level of
detail in the proposed rule regarding the scope of material covered,
assurance requirement, public participation requirements and ground
water protection.
ERP No. DS-AFS-L65208-AK
Rating EC2, Shamrock Timber Sales, Timber Harvesting and Road
Construction, Updated Information, Stikine Area, Kupreanof Island,
Tongass National Forest, Implementation, AK.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with this draft
supplemental EIS based on EPA's previous review and the additional
information provided. EPA encouraged increased use of alternative
silviculture techniques and additional information on cumulative
effects and monitoring. [[Page 7964]]
ERP No. DS-NRC-E06008-TN
Rating EC2, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 and 2, Updated
Information, Related to the Operations, Approval for Application for a
Facility Operating License and NPDES Permit, Rhea County, TN.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding low level
waste disposal pollution prevention and noise. Additional information
on these issues was requested.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-BLM-A60116-00
Rangeland Reform 1994 Program, Implementation, Land Acquisition and
Permits Approval.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns over the Forest
Service's reluctance to implement national standards and guidelines
(S&Gs), inadequate information on how to include state and private
lands, lack of detail on monitoring and instituting adaptive
management, the use of range betterment funds and the need for a
specific S&G to fully evaluate air quality consequences. However, the
final EIS was responsive to many of EPA's comments made on the draft
EIS.
ERP No. F-DOE-E09800-SC
F-Canyon Plutonium Solutions Stabilization Project, Implementation,
Savannah River Site, Aiken and Barnwell Counties, SC.
Summary: EPA's issues were addressed except in the F-Canyon area
where EPA expects minimal impacts.
Dated: February 7, 1995.
Richard E. Sanderson,
Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 95-3389 Filed 2-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.