Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services; Proposed Priorities

Federal RegisterNov 7, 1995

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes priorities for eight programs

administered by the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative

Services (OSERS) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

The Secretary may use these priorities in Fiscal Year 1996 and

subsequent years. The Secretary takes this action to focus Federal

assistance on identified needs to improve outcomes for children with

disabilities. The proposed priorities are intended to ensure wide and

effective use of program funds.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 8, 1996 for the

Research in Education of Individuals with Disabilities Program;

February 5, 1996 for the Special Studies Program; and December 7, 1996

for all remaining programs.

ADDRESSES: All comments concerning proposed priorities under the

Research in Education of Individuals with Disabilities Program, the

Special Studies Program, and Program for Children and Youth with

Serious Emotional Disturbance, should be addressed to: Linda Glidewell,

U.S. Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3524,

Switzer Building, Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. All comments concerning

proposed priorities under the Early Education Program for Children with

Disabilities; the Educational Media Research, Production, Distribution,

and Training Program; the Postsecondary Education Program for

Individuals with Disabilities; the Program for Children with Severe

Disabilities; and the Secondary and Transitional Services for Youth

with Disabilities Program should be addressed to Joseph Clair, U.S.

Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4622,

Switzer Building, Washington D.C. 20202-2644.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The name, address, and telephone

number of the person at the Department to contact for information on

each specific proposed priority is listed under that priority.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice contains thirteen proposed

priorities under eight programs authorized by the Individuals with

Disabilities Education Act, as follows: Research in Education of

Individuals with Disabilities Program (one proposed priority); Early

Education Program for Children with Disabilities (four proposed

priorities); Educational Media Research, Production, Distribution, and

Training Program (one proposed priority); Postsecondary Education

Program for Individuals with Disabilities (one proposed priority);

Program for Children with Severe Disabilities (one proposed priority);

Secondary and Transitional Services for Youth with Disabilities Program

(two proposed priorities); Special Studies Program (two proposed

priorities); and Program for Children and Youth with Serious Emotional

Disturbance (one proposed priority). The purpose of each program is

stated separately under the title of that program.

These proposed priorities would support the National Education

Goals by improving understanding of how to enable children and youth

with disabilities to reach higher levels of academic achievement.

The Secretary will announce the final priorities in a notice in the

Federal Register. The final priorities will be determined by responses

to this notice, available funds, and other considerations of the

Department. Funding of particular projects depends on the availability

of funds, the content of the final priorities, and the quality of the

applications received. Further, priorities could be affected by

enactment of legislation reauthorizing these programs. The publication

of these proposed priorities does not preclude the Secretary from

proposing additional priorities, nor does it limit the Secretary to

funding only these priorities, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking

requirements.

Note: This notice of proposed priorities does not solicit

applications. Notices inviting applications under these competitions

will be published in the Federal Register concurrent with or

following publication of the notices of final priorities.

Research in Education of Individuals With Disabilities Program

Purpose of Program: To advance and improve the knowledge base and

improve the practice of professionals, parents, and others providing

early intervention, special education, and related services--including

professionals in regular education environments--to provide children

with disabilities effective instruction and enable these children to

learn successfully.

Priority

Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the Secretary proposes to give an

absolute preference to applications that meet the following priority.

The Secretary proposes to fund under these competitions only

applications that meet this absolute priority:

Proposed Absolute Priority--Initial Career Awards

Background: There is need to enable individuals in the initial

phases of their careers to initiate and develop promising lines of

research that would improve early intervention services for infants and

toddlers, and special education for children and youth with

disabilities. Support for research activities among individuals in the

initial phases of their careers is intended to develop the capacity of

the special education research community. This priority would address

the additional need to provide support for a broad range of field-

initiated research projects--focusing on the special education and

related services for children and youth with disabilities and early

intervention for infants and toddlers--consistent with the purpose of

the program as described in 34 CFR 324.1.

Priority: The Secretary proposes to establish an absolute priority

for the purpose of awarding grants to eligible applicants for the

support of individuals in the initial phases of their careers to

initiate and develop promising lines of research consistent with the

purposes of the program. For purposes of this priority, the initial

phase of an individuals career is considered to be the first three

years after completing a doctoral program and graduating (e.g., for

fiscal year 1996 awards, projects may support individuals who completed

a doctoral program and graduated no earlier than the 1991-92 academic

year).

Projects must--

(a) Pursue a line of inquiry that reflects a programmatic strand of

research emanating either from theory or a conceptual framework. The

line of research must be evidenced by a series of related questions

that establish directions for designing future studies extending beyond

the support of this award. The project is not intended to represent all

inquiry related to the particular theory or conceptual framework;

rather, it is expected to initiate a new line or advance an existing

one;

(b) Include, in its design and conduct, sustained involvement with

nationally recognized experts having substantive or methodological

knowledge and

[[Page 56193]]

expertise relevant to the proposed research. Experts do not have to be

at the same institution or agency at which the project is located, but

the interaction must be sufficient to develop the capacity of the

researcher to effectively pursue the research into mid-career

activities. At least 50 percent of the researcher's time must be

devoted to the project;

(c) Prepare its procedures, findings, and conclusions in a manner

that informs other interested researchers and is useful for advancing

professional practice or improving programs and services to infants,

toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities and their families; and

(d) Disseminate project procedures, findings, and conclusions to

appropriate research institutes and technical assistance providers.

A project must include in the budget funds to attend the two-day

Research Project Directors' meeting to be held in Washington, D.C. each

year of the project.

For Further Information Contact: Doris Andres, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3526, Switzer Building,

Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-8125. FAX: (202) 205-

8105. Internet: Doris__A[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8953.

Early Education Program for Children With Disabilities Program

Purpose of Program: To support activities that are designed (a) to

address the special needs of children with disabilities, birth through

age eight, and their families; and (b) to assist State and local

entities in expanding and improving programs and services for these

children and their families.

Priorities

Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the Secretary proposes to give an

absolute preference to applications that meet any one of the following

priorities. The Secretary proposes to fund under these competitions

only applications that meet any one of these absolute priorities:

Proposed Absolute Priority 1--National Early Childhood Technical

Assistance Center

Background: This proposed priority would support a national early

childhood technical assistance center that will provide technical

assistance to all States, outlying areas and the Bureau of Indian

Affairs, in order to (1) assist each entity in implementing

comprehensive and quality early intervention services under Part H for

children ages birth through two and their families, and educational and

related services for young children with disabilities (ages three

through five) including minority children and children with limited

English proficiency, and (2) help entities respond to needs identified

through their self-assessment and State monitoring activities. The

center will also provide technical assistance to early childhood

projects funded by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP)

under the IDEA. Utilizing State technical assistance systems, national

organizations and their State divisions, other technical assistance and

clearinghouse projects, the center will provide mechanisms to link

professionals who are involved in producing new knowledge and products

with program administrators and service providers.

Priority: The Secretary proposes to establish an absolute priority

to support a national early childhood technical assistance center. The

center must:

(a) Provide technical assistance to all States, outlying areas, and

the Bureau of Indian Affairs as they implement early intervention

services under Part H, and educational and related services for young

children with disabilities. At a minimum, the center must (1) conduct

annual needs assessments; (2) develop technical assistance agreements

for each entity; (3) provide technical assistance, training, and on-

going consultation based on the technical assistance agreements; (4)

conduct annual meetings for Part H clients and for Section 619 clients;

and (5) assist States in coordinating early intervention services and

preschool services with IDEA school-age programs.

(b) Provide technical assistance to all early childhood projects

funded by OSEP. At a minimum, the center must (1) conduct annual needs

assessments; (2) develop technical assistance agreements for each

project; (3) provide technical assistance, training, and on-going

consultation based on the technical assistance agreements; and (4)

conduct an annual meeting for directors of early childhood

discretionary projects funded by OSEP;

(c) Establish an advisory group of persons with complementary

expertise in the content and provision of technical assistance, e.g.,

State issues, project issues, family issues, parenting, evaluation, and

needs of underrepresented children and families; to advise the center

on its technical assistance activities;

(d) Link entities and OSEP-funded early childhood projects with

national experts knowledgeable about best practice for young children

with disabilities and their families, including children and families

from cultural and linguistic minority groups;

(e) Develop informational exchanges between the center and State

technical assistance systems; and among States with technical

assistance systems;

(f) Develop an information system, current in content and

technological accessibility, that contains data and materials to meet

the technical assistance needs of the center's clients;

(g) Conduct at least two national forums that identify persistent

problems, propose solutions, and respond to emerging issues and trends

in early intervention and preschool;

(h) Facilitate exchanges of information among federal and State

programs regarding funding and policy practices and implications for

young children with disabilities and their families;

(i) Provide logistical and technical support to the Federal

Interagency Coordinating Council;

(j) Compile and disseminate information about (1) early childhood

projects funded by OSERS, (2) effective practices for early

intervention and preschool programs, (3) major State activities related

to implementing Section 619--Preschool Grants Program, (4) major State

activities related to implementing the Infant and Toddler Program--Part

H program, and (5) successful linkage activities and practices;

(k) Coordinate with other technical assistance networks to sponsor

a forum that addresses model practices for national and State technical

assistance provision;

(l) Evaluate the impact of the center's technical assistance system

and its components relative to (1) the assessed needs of States,

jurisdictions and early childhood projects; and (2) the national needs

of young children with disabilities and their families.

The Secretary anticipates funding one cooperative agreement for a

project period of up to 60 months subject to the requirements of 34 CFR

75.253(a) for continuation awards. In determining whether to continue

the center for the fourth and fifth years of the project period, in

addition to applying the requirements of 34 CFR 75.253(a), the

Secretary will consider the recommendation of a review team consisting

of three experts selected by the Secretary. The services of the review

team, including a two-day visit to the center, are to be performed

during the

[[Page 56194]]

last half of the center's second year and must be included in that

year's evaluation required under 34 CFR 75.590. Funds to cover the

costs of the review team must be included in the center's budget for

year two. These costs are estimated to be approximately $4000.

The Secretary particularly encourages applicants for this

cooperative agreement to incorporate technologically innovative

approaches in all aspects of center activities, to improve their

efficiency and impact.

Selection Criteria for Evaluating Applications. The Secretary

proposes to use the following criteria to evaluate an application under

the national early childhood technical assistance center competition.

The maximum score for all the criteria is 100 points.

(a) Plan of operation. (10 points)

(1) The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality

of the plan of operation for the project.

(2) The Secretary considers--

(i) The extent to which the management plan will ensure proper and

efficient administration of the project;

(ii) The quality of the activities proposed to accomplish the goals

and objectives;

(iii) The adequacy of proposed timelines for accomplishing those

activities; and

(iv) Effectiveness in the ways in which the applicant plans to use

the resources and personnel to accomplish the goals and objectives.

(3) How the applicant will ensure that project participants who are

otherwise eligible to participate are selected without regard to race,

color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.

(b) Quality of key personnel. (15 points)

(1) The Secretary reviews each application to determine the

qualifications of the key personnel the applicant plans to use.

(2) The Assistant Secretary considers--

(i) The qualifications of the project director and project

coordinator (if one is used);

(ii) The qualifications of each of the other key project personnel;

(iii) The time that each person referred to in paragraphs (b)(2)(i)

and (ii) of this section will commit to the project; and

(iv) How the applicant will ensure that personnel are selected for

employment without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, age,

or disability.

(3) To determine personnel qualifications under (b)(2)(i) and (ii)

of this section, the Secretary considers--

(i) Experience and training in fields related to the objectives of

the project; and

(ii) Any other qualifications that pertain to the quality of the

project.

(c) Budget and cost effectiveness. (5 points)

(1) The Secretary reviews each application to determine if the

project has an adequate budget.

(2) The Secretary considers the extent to which--

(i) The budget for the project is adequate to support project

activities; and

(ii) Costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives of the

project.

(d) Evaluation plan. (10 points)

(1) The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality

of the evaluation plan for the project.

(2) The Secretary considers--

(i) The extent to which the applicant's methods of evaluation are

appropriate to the project; and

(ii) To the degree possible, the extent to which the applicant's

methods of evaluation are objective and produce data that are

quantifiable.

(e) Adequacy of resources. (10 points)

(1) The Secretary reviews each application to determine adequacy of

resources allocated to the project.

(2) The Secretary considers the adequacy of the facilities and the

equipment and supplies that the applicant plans to use.

(f) Evidence of need. (10 points)

(1) The Secretary reviews each application to assess whether the

need for the proposed technical assistance has been adequately

justified.

(2) The Secretary determines the extent to which the application--

(i) Describes the technical assistance needs to be addressed by the

project;

(ii) Describes how the applicant identified those needs;

(iii) Describes how those needs will be met by the project; and

(iv) Describes the benefits to be gained by meeting those needs.

(g) Project design. (40 points)

(1) The Secretary reviews each application to evaluate the quality

of the proposed technical assistance project design.

(2) The Secretary determines the extent to which--

(i) The technical assistance objectives are designed to meet the

identified needs and are clearly defined, measurable, and achievable;

(ii) The content of the proposed technical assistance is

appropriate for all clients.

(3) The Secretary determines the extent to which each application

provides for--

(i) Use of current research findings and information on model

practices in providing the technical assistance.

(ii) Methods for linking all clients in need of technical

assistance;

(iii) Innovative procedures for disseminating information and

imparting skills to all clients; and

(iv) Innovative procedures for collaborating and coordinating with

other entities that are involved with broader technical assistance

efforts.

For Further Information Contact: Peggy Cvach, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4609, Switzer Building,

Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-9807. FAX: (202) 205-

8971. Internet: Peggy__C[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Proposed Absolute Priority 2--Model Demonstration Projects for Young

Children With Disabilities

Background: This priority supports projects that develop,

implement, evaluate, and disseminate new or improved approaches for

serving young children with disabilities (infants, toddlers, and

children ages birth through eight) and their families, including

minority children and children with limited English proficiency.

Projects supported under this priority are expected to be major

contributors of models or components of models for service providers

and for outreach projects funded under the Individuals with

Disabilities Education Act.

The Secretary anticipates funding projects for a project period of

up to 60 months. Projects supported for an initial three-year period

may be eligible for an additional two years of funding to field test

the viability of their models at other site locations. In determining

whether to continue funding for the fourth and fifth years of the

project period, the Secretary, in addition to applying the requirements

of 34 CFR 75.253(a), considers the recommendation of a review team

consisting of three experts selected by the Secretary. The services of

the review team, including a two-day site visit, are to be performed

during a project's third year and may be included in that year's annual

evaluation. The three-plus-two-year funding period is expected to

determine whether models yielding positive results at an original site

can be successfully replicated at other locations.

Priority: A model demonstration project must--

[[Page 56195]]

(a) Develop and implement programs that address a service problem

or issue in the most natural or least restrictive environment;

(b) Develop and implement programs with specific components or

strategies that are based on theory, research, or evaluation data;

(c) Produce detailed procedures and materials that enable others to

replicate the model as implemented at the original site; and,

(d) Evaluate the model at the original model development site and--

if approved for funding beyond the initial three years of the project

period--at other sites to determine whether the model can be adopted by

other sites and yield similar positive results. In its evaluation, a

project must use multiple outcome measures to determine the

effectiveness of the model and its components or strategies, including

measures of multiple, functional child and family outcomes, other

indicators of the effects of the model, and cost data associated with

implementing the model.

In determining whether to continue a project for the fourth and

fifth years of the project period, in addition to considering factors

in 34 CFR 75.253(a), the Secretary considers the following:

(a) The degree to which the model developed by the project is, or

would be by the end of year three, viable and replicable by other

agencies, and provides state-of-the-art interventions.

(b) The extent to which dissemination of the model would meet a

significant or unique service need in other geographic locations.

(c) Compelling, quantifiable evidence of the effectiveness of the

model as implemented at the original development site.

(d) Availability of funding for the model from sources other than

discretionary grants under the Individuals with Disabilities Education

Act to support the operation of the model at the original development

site during years four and five.

(e) Evidence of the commitment of other agencies not affiliated

with the original project to adopt its model and participate in

evaluation of the model during years four and five of the project

period.

(f) The extent to which the project has sound plans for aiding in

replication and for evaluating its model at replication sites during

years four and five of the project period.

A project that applies for funding for the fourth and fifth years

must set aside in its budget for the third year funds to cover costs

associated with the services to be performed by the review team

appointed by the Secretary to evaluate the project in the third year.

These funds are estimated to be approximately $4,000.

For Further Information Contact: Patricia Wright, U.S. Department

of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4623, Switzer

Building, Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-9377. Fax:

(202) 205-8971. Internet: Patricia__W[email protected]. Individuals who use

a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Proposed Absolute Priority 3--Outreach Projects for Young Children With

Disabilities

Background: This priority supports projects that assist educational

and other agencies in implementing proven models, components of models,

and other exemplary practices, to improve services for young children

with disabilities (infants, toddlers, and children ages birth through

eight) and their families, including minority children and children

with limited English proficiency. To accomplish this goal, State

agencies and local service agencies need information about and

assistance in accessing the range of available, successful practices,

curricula, and products.

The models, components of models, or exemplary practices selected

for outreach need not have been developed through the Early Childhood

Education Program under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

(IDEA), or by the applicant.

To increase the impact of outreach activities, projects are

encouraged to select sites in multiple States. The Department of

Education funds an Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center under

IDEA to assist outreach projects in addressing the needs of States.

This Center will help projects match their resources to identified

States' needs for years two and three. Therefore, the plan of operation

for projects planning to conduct outreach activities in multiple States

should include plans concerning specific sites and activities for the

initial year only.

Priority: An outreach project must--

(a) Disseminate information about and assist in replicating proven

models, components of models, or exemplary practices that provide or

improve services for young children with disabilities and their

families in the most natural or least restrictive environment;

(b) Coordinate its dissemination and replication activities with

the lead agency for Part H of the IDEA for early intervention services

or the State educational agency for special education, as well as with

technical assistance, information, and personnel development networks

within the State;

(c) Involve families in the design, implementation, and evaluation

of project activities;

(d) Ensure interagency coordination if multiple agencies are

involved in the provision of services;

(e) Ensure that the model, components of models, or exemplary

practices are consistent with Part B and Part H of IDEA, are state-of-

the-art, match the needs of the proposed sites, and have evaluation

data supporting their effectiveness;

(f) Include public awareness, product development and

dissemination, training, and technical assistance activities, and

written plans for site development;

(g) Describe criteria for selecting implementation sites and, for

potential users, the expected costs, needed personnel, staff training,

equipment, and sequence of implementation activities; and

(h) Evaluate the outreach activities to determine their

effectiveness. The evaluation must include the types and numbers of

sites where outreach activities are conducted, number of persons

trained, types of follow-up activities, number of children and families

served at the site where models were adopted or adapted, child progress

and family satisfaction, and changes in the model or practice made by

sites.

For Further Information Contact: Lee Coleman, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4615, Switzer Building,

Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-8166. FAX: (202) 205-

8971. Internet: Lee__C[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Proposed Absolute Priority 4--Early Childhood Research Institutes

Background: The purpose of this priority is to support three early

childhood research institutes, each of which will carry out research,

development, evaluation and dissemination activities to improve early

intervention and preschool services for children with disabilities and

their families. One award will be made in each of the following three

areas:

(1) Early Childhood Research Institute on Culturally and

Linguistically Competent Services. This institute's program of research

will focus on creating a resource bank of validated,

[[Page 56196]]

culturally and linguistically appropriate materials and documented

strategies (including child find and child instructional materials,

personnel training manuals, family services materials) that can be used

by service providers to work effectively with infants, toddlers, and

preschool age children with disabilities and their families who have

special needs because of their cultural or linguistic backgrounds. In

addition to developing and field testing new materials and documented

strategies to fill gaps, the institute will collect and catalog already

existing materials, conduct reviews and field testing of selected

materials, and broadly disseminate information about how to access

materials collected or created by the institute.

(2) Early Childhood Research Institute on Increasing Learning

Opportunities for Children through Families. The purpose of this

institute is to identify, develop and evaluate strategies that will

increase the number and intensity of planned learning activities that

parents, and other caregivers can implement in structured and

unstructured settings for infants, toddlers, and preschool age children

with disabilities to prepare these children to enter school ready to

learn, including those who are members of racial minority groups and

individuals with limited English proficiency. These strategies (such as

incidental teaching, use of educational games and toys, technology

applications, evening and weekend activities) must be designed in a way

that will complement services that are specified on Individualized

Family Service Plans and Individual Education Programs and promote

further skill acquisition, generalization and child growth and

development. The institute will conduct a series of investigations to

determine the effects and costs of various strategies that are

developed in each of the following areas of child development:

cognitive development, communication development, physical development,

and social and emotional development. The institute's dissemination

efforts will include the preparation of manuals for professionals,

parents, and other caregivers that describe (1) procedures to determine

additional learning opportunities for individual children, and (2) how

to implement the strategies in a variety of settings and in a manner

that complements other early intervention and preschool services.

(3) Early Childhood Research Institute on Program Performance

Measures. The purpose of this institute is to develop, evaluate, and

disseminate a program performance measurement system for early

intervention, preschool, and primary-grade programs serving children

with disabilities (birth through eight years) and their families. The

performance measurement system will consist of child and family

outcomes for different child ages within the early childhood age range

as well as indicators and sources of data corresponding to each

outcome. These child and family outcomes, indicators, and sources of

data must be useful for tracking the progress of a broad range of

children and families with different disabilities and characteristics

and for measuring the impact and effectiveness of early childhood

programs. For the performance measurement system to be useful at

federal, State, and local levels, it will include child and family

outcomes of a general nature (i.e., outcomes appropriate for tracking

the progress of all young children with disabilities and their

families, including those who are members of cultural, linguistic, or

racial minority groups) as well as sets of more specific outcomes. Each

of the sets of more specific outcomes should correspond with a

particular subgroup of children and families (e.g., children who are

visually-impaired; families with incomes below the poverty level) that

have characteristics unique to that subgroup, and that are

appropriately separated from other subgroups for more precise and

relevant measurement purposes.

In carrying out the developmental work, which will include

consensus development activities based on input from a variety of

professionals and parents, the institute will build upon other relevant

efforts, including the work of the National Center on Educational

Outcomes and the National Goals Panel on School Readiness. Once the

initial developmental work is complete, the institute will conduct

research activities to determine the feasibility, usefulness and

appropriateness of the outcomes, indicators, and data sources in a

variety of programs serving young children with disabilities and their

families. The results of the research will include a system for

measuring child and family attainment of outcomes, indicators of

outcomes that are written in operational terms, and instruments and

other data sources for each outcome. The measurement system must be

designed in a manner that captures partial attainment or progress

toward attainment of each outcome, and a method of using the results of

the measurement system for program improvement.

Priority: Each institute considered for funding under this priority

must--

(a) Conduct a program of research and development that addresses

one of the issues identified above;

(b) Identify specific strategies and procedures that will be

investigated;

(c) Carry out the research within a conceptual framework, based on

previous research or theory, that provides a basis for the strategies

and procedures to be studied, the research methods and instrumentation

that will be used, and the specific target populations and settings

that will be studied;

(d) Collect, analyze, and report a variety of data, including (1)

information on the settings, the service providers, the children and

families targeted by the institute (e.g., age, disability, level of

functioning and membership in a special population, if appropriate),

(2) outcome data from multiple measures for the children and families

who are the focus of the strategies and procedures; and (3)

implementation data from the service providers, administrators and

others involved in the research;

(e) Conduct the research with a broad range of children with

disabilities and their families who are receiving early intervention

and preschool services in typical service delivery settings;

(f) Conduct the research using methodological procedures that are

designed to produce unambiguous findings regarding the effects of the

strategies and procedures, as well as any findings on interaction

effects between particular strategies and particular characteristics of

participants or settings. These findings will be obtained through

appropriate sample selection and adequate sample size to permit use of

the findings in policy analyses;

(g) Design research activities that lead to improved services for

children with disabilities and their families;

(h) Develop and field test products that can be used for training

and technical assistance activities with policy makers, administrators,

school board members, parents, and service providers that are likely to

facilitate the implementation of the institute's findings and products

in a variety of early intervention and preschool settings;

(i) Coordinate the research activities with other relevant efforts

sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education, including other research

institutes, technical assistance entities, and information

clearinghouses;

(j) Provide training and research opportunities for a limited

number of graduate students.

The Secretary anticipates funding three cooperative agreements with

a

[[Page 56197]]

project period of up to 60 months subject to the requirements of 34 CFR

75.253(a) for continuation awards. In determining whether to continue

an institute for the fourth and fifth years of the project period, the

Secretary, in addition to applying the requirements of 34 CFR

75.253(a), will consider the following:

(1) The recommendation of a review team consisting of three experts

selected by the Secretary. The services of the review team, including a

two-day visit to the Institute, are to be performed during the last

half of the Institute's second year and must be included in that year's

evaluation required under 34 CFR 75.590. In its budget for the second

year, the Institute must set aside funds to cover the costs of the

review team. These funds are estimated to be approximately $4,000; (2)

the timeliness and effectiveness with which all requirements of the

negotiated cooperative agreement have been or are being met by the

Institute; and (3) the degree to which the Institute's research designs

and methodological procedures demonstrate the potential for producing

significant new knowledge and products.

For Further Information Contact: Patricia Wright, U.S. Department

of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 4623, Switzer

Building, Washington, DC 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-9377. FAX:

(202) 205-8971. Internet: Patricia__W[email protected]. Individuals who use

a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,

82, 85, and 86; and (b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part

309.

Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of

higher education only.

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1423.

Educational Media Research, Production, Distribution, and Training

Program

Purpose of Program: To promote the general welfare of deaf and hard

of hearing individuals and individuals with visual impairments, and to

promote the educational advancement of individuals with disabilities.

Priority

Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the Secretary proposes to give an

absolute preference to applications that meet the following priority.

The Secretary proposes to fund under this competition only applications

that meet this absolute priority:

Proposed Absolute Priority--Closed-Captioned Television Programs

Background: This priority supports cooperative agreements to

provide closed-captioning of television programs in a variety of areas:

(1) National news and public information programs; (2) movies, mini-

series, special programs, and other programs broadcast during prime-

time; (3) children's programs; and (4) syndicated television programs.

National News and Public Information. This activity will continue

and expand closed-captioned national news, public information programs,

and emergency programming, so that persons with hearing impairments can

have access to up-to-date national morning, evening, and weekend news,

as well as information concerning current events and other significant

public information. In making awards the Secretary will consider the

extent to which programs on each major national commercial and public

broadcast network continue to be captioned. For news and public

information programs that have previously been captioned, funds

provided under this category may be used to support no more than one-

half of the captioning costs. Funds provided under this category also

may be used to support the captioning of emergency programming.

Movies, Mini-Series, and Special Programs. This activity will

continue and expand the closed-captioning of movies, mini-series, and

special programs available on major national broadcast networks or

basic cable networks. In making awards the Secretary will consider the

extent to which prime-time movies and other programs on each major

national commercial broadcast network continue to be closed-captioned.

Funds provided under this category may be used to support no more than

one-half of the captioning costs for movies, mini-series, and special

programs.

Children's Programs. This activity will provide closed-captioning

of children's programs shown on national commercial and public

broadcast networks, as well as syndicated and basic cable programs

shown nationally, so that children who are deaf or hard of hearing will

have access to popular children's programs. In making awards the

Secretary will consider the extent to which children's programs on each

major national commercial and public broadcast network, syndicated, and

basic cable children's programs continue to be captioned.

Syndicated Television Programming. This activity will provide

closed-captioning of syndicated television programs, thereby making a

variety of programs available at different times, depending on local

distribution. Syndicated programming includes both evergreen

programming (popular previously-broadcast programs or series), and new

programs distributed for showing on individual stations. In making

awards, the Secretary considers the anticipated shelf-life and the

range of distribution of the captioned programs possible without

further costs to the project beyond the initial captioning costs, as

well as the extent to which programs currently captioned may continue

to be captioned.

Priority: Under this competition, the Secretary intends to make one

or more awards in each of the four areas of activity identified above.

Each application may address only one of the areas of activity.

Projects must--

(a) Include procedures and criteria for selecting programs for

captioning that take into account the preference of consumers for

particular programs, the diversity of programming available, and the

contribution of programs to the general educational, and cultural

experiences of individuals with hearing impairments;

(b) Provide a flexible plan to assure closed-captioning of

television programs without interruption, while accommodating last-

minute program substitutions and new programs;

(c) Identify the total number of hours and the projected cost per

hour for each of the programs to be captioned;

(d) Identify for each proposed program to be captioned the source

of private or other public support and the projected dollar amount of

that support;

(e) Identify the methods of captioning to be used for each

program--indicating whether captioning is provided in real-time, live

display, offline, or reformatted--and the projected cost per hour for

each method used;

(f) For national news and public information, provide and maintain

back-up systems that will ensure successful, timely captioning service,

despite national or regional emergency situations;

(g) Demonstrate the willingness of each major network or providers

of syndicated programs included in the project to permit captioning of

their programs;

(h) Implement procedures for monitoring the extent to which full

and accurate captioning is provided and use this information to make

refinements in captioning operations; and

[[Page 56198]]

(i) Identify the anticipated shelf-life, and the range of

distribution of the programs captioned without further costs to the

project beyond the initial captioning costs. (Syndicated programs

only).

For Further Information Contact: Ernest Hairston, U.S. Department

of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4629, Switzer

Building, Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-9172. FAX:

(202) 205-8971. Internet: Ernest__H[email protected]. Individuals who use

a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,

82, 85, and 86; and (b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR

parts 330, 331, and 332.

Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of

higher education only.

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1451, 1452.

Postsecondary Education Programs for Individuals With Disabilities

Program

Purpose of Program: To provide assistance for the development,

operation, and dissemination of specially designed model programs of

postsecondary, vocational, technical, continuing, or adult education

for individuals with disabilities.

Priority

Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the Secretary proposes to give an

absolute preference to applications that meet the following priority.

The Secretary proposes to fund under this competition only applications

that meet this absolute priority:

Proposed Absolute Priority--Model Demonstration Projects to Improve the

Delivery and Outcomes of Postsecondary Education for Individuals With

Disabilities

Background: This priority supports projects that develop,

implement, evaluate, and disseminate new or improved approaches for

serving the needs of students with disabilities in postsecondary

settings. Projects supported under this priority are expected to be

major contributors of models or components of models for service

providers in the field and for outreach projects funded under the

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act.

Although institutions of higher education have implemented measures

to accommodate students with disabilities since the 1970's,

longitudinal and follow-up studies of students exiting from secondary

schools consistently show that proportionately fewer students with

disabilities receive any type of postsecondary education than students

without disabilities. Further, those students with disabilities who do

attend postsecondary institutions are significantly less likely to

complete their studies or to be employed following their postsecondary

experience. To change these outcomes, a number of specific barriers

must be addressed, including the following:

Improving student potential for successful postsecondary

experiences. Some students with disabilities and their families may be

unaware of the range of available postsecondary opportunities. Other

students may be aware of these options but may not be prepared to

benefit from postsecondary education. To increase the number of

students with disabilities entering and successfully completing

postsecondary education, there is a need to develop strategies for

outreach activities to inform secondary special education teachers and

counselors in secondary schools about the range of postsecondary

opportunities available and how to work with students and families to

understand and access these opportunities. Further, there is a need to

develop or adapt programs such as Upward Bound and Talent Search that

assist potential candidates to access postsecondary education.

Accommodating diverse learning styles in a range of academic

settings. As the number and range of students with disabilities

entering postsecondary institutions increase, there will be a

continuing need for an institution's administration to accommodate or

modify instructional strategies and classroom environments to promote

improved participation and performance for these students. Thus,

postsecondary institutions will have to work with individual faculty

members and staff to implement the accommodations needed by particular

students. This is likely to require institutional strategies (1) to

understand state-of-the-art practice in accommodating the full range of

students with disabilities in traditional and emerging learning

environments, and (2) to provide training on an on-going, as well as

student-specific, basis to faculty or staff.

Transferring of student accommodations to the employment setting.

Students with disabilities who require classroom accommodations and

adaptations to improve academic performance may require similar types

of accommodations or adaptations on the job. In addition, specific jobs

or professions may need additional accommodations or adaptations to

successfully employ particular students with disabilities. Thus, there

is a need to develop strategies for helping students, placement

specialists, and employers determine the accommodations or adaptations

that would be required for professions or employment settings of

interest to the student, and for transferring or arranging for those

accommodations. This is likely to require cooperative efforts among

representatives of the services responsible for successful vocational

placements for people with disabilities.

These collaborative efforts must include extensive involvement of

representatives from an institution's program that provides support

services to students with disabilities, the institution's career

placement office, the State vocational rehabilitation (VR) agency (for

VR-sponsored students), and business and industry.

Priority: A model demonstration project must--

(a) Develop and implement programs that address at least one of the

three specific service issues described in the background of this

proposed priority;

(b) Develop and implement programs with specific components or

strategies that are based on theory, research, or evaluation data;

(c) Produce detailed procedures and materials that enable others to

replicate the model as implemented in the original site; and,

(d) Evaluate the model by using multiple outcome measures to

determine the effectiveness of the model and its components or

strategies, including measures of multiple, functional student

outcomes, other indicators of the effects of the model, and cost data

associated with implementing the model.

For Further Information Contact: Michael Ward, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4624, Switzer B

Building, Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-8163. FAX:

(202) 205-8971. Internet: Michael__W[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,

82, 85, and 86; and (b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part

338.

[[Page 56199]]

Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of

higher education only.

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1424a.

Program for Children With Severe Disabilities

Purpose of Program: To provide Federal assistance to address the

special needs of infants, toddlers, children, and youth with severe

disabilities--including children with deaf-blindness--and their

families.

Priority

Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the Secretary proposes to give an

absolute preference to applications that meet the following priority.

The Secretary proposes to fund under this competition only applications

that meet this absolute priority:

Proposed Absolute Priority--Outreach Projects: Serving Children With

Severe Disabilities in General Education and Community Settings

Background: This priority supports projects that assist educational

and other agencies in implementing proven models, components of models,

and exemplary practices to improve services for children and youth with

severe disabilities and their families. State and local education

agencies are engaged in systemic educational reform efforts emphasizing

development of teaching and learning standards, student assessment,

mobilizing community and parental support, technology, and school to

work initiatives for all students. To support these efforts, State

agencies and local service agencies need information on successful

practices, curricula, and products that have proven effective in

including students with severe disabilities in social and academic

settings and activities.

The models, components of models, or exemplary practices selected

for outreach activities need not have been developed through the

Program for Children with Severe Disabilities under the Individuals

with Disabilities Education Act, or by the applicant.

The practices to be implemented during the outreach activities may

focus on, but are not limited to, transition from school to adult life,

behavior management, coordination of services, or strategies that

facilitate the inclusion of children with severe disabilities into

their neighborhood schools and local communities. To increase their

visibility and to enhance the impact of outreach activities, projects

are encouraged to establish adoption sites in multiple States.

Priority: An outreach project must--

(a) Disseminate information about and assist in replicating proven

models, components of models, or exemplary practices that provide or

improve services for children with severe disabilities and their

families in general education and community settings;

(b) Coordinate its dissemination and replication activities with

the lead agency for Part H of the IDEA for early intervention services

or the State educational agency for special education, as well as

technical assistance, information, and personnel development networks

within the State;

(c) Involve children, as appropriate, and their families in the

design, implementation, and evaluation of project activities;

(d) Ensure interagency coordination if multiple agencies are

involved in the provision of services;

(e) Ensure that the models, components of models, or exemplary

practices are consistent with Parts B and H of the IDEA, are state-of-

the-art, match the needs of the proposed sites, and have evaluation

data supporting their effectiveness;

(f) Include public awareness, product development and

dissemination, training, and technical assistance activities, and

written plans for site development;

(g) Describe criteria for selecting implementation sites and, for

potential users, the expected costs, needed personnel, staff training,

equipment, and the sequence of implementation activities;

(h) Evaluate the outreach activities to determine their

effectiveness. The evaluation must include the types and numbers of

sites where outreach activities are conducted, number of persons

trained, types of follow-up activities, number of children and families

served at the site where models or practices were adopted or adapted,

child progress and family satisfaction, and changes in the model or

practices made by sites.

For Further Information Contact: Anne Smith, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4621, Switzer Building,

Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-8888. Fax: (202) 205-

8971. Internet: Anne__S[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,

82, 85, and 86; and (b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part

315.

Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of

higher education only.

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1424.

Secondary Education and Transitional Services for Youth With

Disabilities Program

Purpose of Program: To (1) assist youth with disabilities in the

transition from secondary school to postsecondary environments, such as

competitive or supported employment, and (2) ensure that secondary

special education and transitional services result in competitive or

supported employment for youth with disabilities.

Priorities

Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the Secretary proposes to give an

absolute preference to applications that meet any one of the following

priorities. The Secretary proposes to fund under these competitions

only applications that meet any one of these absolute priorities:

Proposed Absolute Priority 1--Outreach Projects for Services for Youth

With Disabilities

Background: This priority supports projects that assist educational

and other agencies in implementing proven models, components of models,

or other exemplary practices to improve secondary education and

transitional services for youth with disabilities in areas such as

continuing education, self-determination, vocational education and

training, supported competitive employment, leisure and recreation, and

independent living.

Data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS)

indicated that secondary education students with disabilities averaged

70% of their time in regular education settings. The study also

suggests that 38% of students with disabilities drop out before their

completion, with repeated course failure a strong predictor of dropping

out. Many of these students were in regular education classes without

the help of academic support services (e.g., tutors, study skills and

test-taking preparation classes, learning labs). The provision of these

services and enrollment in vocational training courses had significant

``holding power'' for those students who had the potential for dropping

out. The NLTS also found that youth who belonged to school or community

groups did better in school, were less likely to drop out, and

experienced a higher probability of entering postsecondary education.

Thus, there is a critical need for secondary schools to accommodate or

modify

[[Page 56200]]

instructional strategies and classroom environments to promote improved

participation and performance of students with disabilities.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires

that a statement of needed transition services be included in the

individualized education program (IEP) for each student beginning no

later than age 16, and at a younger age, if determined appropriate, and

that the services be updated on an annual basis (20 U.S.C.

1401(A)(20)(D)). To effectively meet this requirement, State agencies

and local service agencies need information on successful practices,

curricula, and products.

The models, components of models, or exemplary practices selected

for outreach need not have been developed through the Secondary and

Transitional Services Program under the IDEA, or by the applicant. To

increase the impact of outreach activities, projects are encouraged to

select sites in multiple regions or States.

Priority: An outreach project must--

(a) Disseminate information about and assist in replicating proven

models, components of models, or exemplary practices that provide or

improve secondary and transitional services for students with

disabilities in community-based settings or the least restrictive

environment, as appropriate;

(b) Coordinate its dissemination and replication activities with

relevant State and local educational agencies, consumer organizations,

administrative entities established in the service delivery area under

the Job Training Partnership Act, and, if appropriate, other systems

for transitional services for youth with disabilities as well as with

technical assistance, information, and personnel development networks

within the State;

(c) Involve students and adults with disabilities in the design,

implementation, and evaluation of project activities;

(d) Ensure coordination with schools, vocational rehabilitation

agencies, adult service providers, and potential employers, if

appropriate;

(e) Ensure that the model, components of models, or exemplary

practices are consistent with Part B of the IDEA, are state-of-the-art,

match the needs of proposed sites, and have evaluation data supporting

their effectiveness;

(f) Include public awareness, product development and

dissemination, training, and technical assistance activities, and

written plans for site development;

(g) Describe criteria for selecting implementation sites and, for

potential users, the expected costs, needed personnel, staff training,

equipment, and the sequence of implementation activities;

(h) Evaluate the outreach activities to determine their

effectiveness. The evaluation must include the types and numbers of

sites where outreach activities are conducted, number of persons

trained, types of follow-up activities, number of youth and families

served at the site where models were adopted or adapted, youth progress

and satisfaction, and changes in the model or practice made by sites.

For Further Information Contact: Michael Ward, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4624, Switzer Building,

Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-8163. Fax: (202) 205-

8971. Internet: Michael__W[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Proposed Absolute Priority 2--Model Demonstration Projects to Improve

the Delivery and Outcomes of Secondary Education Services for Students

With Disabilities

Background: This priority supports projects that develop,

implement, evaluate, and disseminate new or improved approaches for

serving the needs of students with disabilities in secondary school

settings. Projects must coordinate their activities with State and

local partnerships developed under the School-to-Work Opportunities Act

to prepare all students for high-skill, high-wage jobs or further

education and training. In particular, the school-based learning

activities must be tied to occupational skills standards and

challenging academic standards. Projects supported under this priority

are expected to be major contributors of models or components of models

for secondary school services providers in the field and for outreach

projects funded under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS)

indicated that secondary education students with disabilities averaged

70% of their time in regular education settings. The study also

suggests that 38% of students with disabilities drop out before their

completion, with repeated course failure a strong predictor of dropping

out. Many of these students were in regular education classes without

the help of academic support services (e.g., tutors, study skills and

test-taking preparation classes, learning labs). The provision of these

services and enrollment in vocational training courses had significant

``holding power'' for those students who had the potential for dropping

out. The NLTS also found that youth who belonged to school or community

groups did better in school, were less likely to drop out, and

experienced a higher probability of entering postsecondary education.

Thus, there is a critical need for secondary schools to accommodate or

modify instructional strategies and classroom environments to promote

improved participation and performance for students with disabilities.

In order to meet the needs of students with disabilities in

secondary settings, a number of service issues need to be addressed:

(a) Providing counseling, tutoring, assistive technology and other

support strategies to prevent course failure among students with

disabilities; (b) restructuring academic and/or vocational course

offerings (e.g., content, instructional procedures, and sequencing) to

accommodate students with disabilities with diverse learning needs and

styles; (c) revising academic courses in a manner that directly

complements skills taught in vocational education programs and in other

courses; and (d) developing extracurricular activities for students

with disabilities that promote the retention and generalization of

academic and vocational skills in a variety of settings.

In order to implement the accommodations needed by particular

students, it is important that strategies be developed in coordination

with individual teachers and related services personnel. These linkages

are likely to result from institutional strategies that (1) are based

on an understanding of state-of-the-art practice in accommodating the

full range of students with disabilities in traditional and emerging

learning environments, and (2) provide training on an on-going, as well

as student-specific, basis to teachers and other personnel.

Priority: A model demonstration project must--

(1) Develop and implement programs that address at least one of the

specific service issues described in the background of this proposed

priority;

(2) Develop and implement programs with specific components or

strategies that are based on theory, research, or evaluation data;

(3) Produce detailed procedures and materials that would enable

others to replicate the model as implemented in the original site; and,

[[Page 56201]]

(4) Evaluate the model by using multiple outcome measures to

determine the effectiveness of the model and its components or

strategies, including measures of multiple, functional student and

family outcomes, other indicators of the effects of the model, and cost

data associated with implementing the model.

For Further Information Contact: Michael Ward, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 4624, Switzer Building,

Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-8163. Fax: (202) 205-

8971. Internet: Michael__W[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8169.

Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,

82, 85, and 86; and (b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part

326.

Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of

higher education only.

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1425.

Special Studies Program

Purpose of Program: To support studies to evaluate the impact of

the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), including

efforts to provide a free appropriate public education to children and

youth with disabilities, and early intervention services to infants and

toddlers with disabilities.

Priorities

Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the Secretary proposes to give an

absolute preference to applications that meet any one of the following

priorities. The Secretary proposes to fund under these competitions

only applications that meet any one of these absolute priorities:

Proposed Absolute Priority 1--Testing the Use of An Instrument to

Measure Student Progress

Background: The Office of Special Education Programs funded the

development and testing of the PASS (Performance Assessment for Self-

Sufficiency) system to respond to the needs of local, State, and

federal agencies for information on the post-school services required

by students with disabilities as they make the transition to adult

service delivery systems. The field test of PASS indicated that the

system also had great potential for use in measuring student outcomes.

The findings from the field test on the utility of the PASS system

indicate that PASS may be useful for a wide range of purposes

including:

Developing a systematic method of estimating the post-

school needs of exiting students with disabilities.

Developing a transition planning tool that would be used

to develop and monitor individualized education/transition plans (IEPs/

ITPs), to track student progress, and to be used for follow-up purposes

after exiting school.

Documenting outcomes, identifying programs and curriculum

needs, and for evaluating programs.

Improving interagency coordination and teamwork.

Providing a common database for use at local, State and

national levels.

The results of the field test lead the Office of Special Education

Programs to conclude that deployment of the PASS at this time is

premature and an investigation of the feasibility and utility of the

PASS system as a tool for transition planning, and for measuring

student outcomes, is in order.

The PASS System. The PASS system has two main components: The PASS

Instrument, and the PASS Expert System. The PASS instrument obtains

teachers' assessments of four major competency areas related to

functional performance skills demanded by adult life. First, teachers

complete the PASS instrument which provides ratings of students for a

broad array of functional performance indicators in four general

domains: Daily Living, Personal and Social Development, Employment, and

Educational Performance. The specific skills and behaviors targeted on

the PASS instrument are ones that are typically required for adult life

and that have service implications. For example, very low performance

ratings on several specific indicators--such as ``moves self about in

immediate neighborhood (E.G., walking, bicycling), ``uses public

transportation if available (e.g., bus, taxi), ``uses maps and bus

schedules when appropriate'', etc.--suggest differing needs for

assistance with mobility and transportation aspects of daily living.

The PASS also provides information about the student's training,

education, and employment, as well as major problem behaviors. No

special assessment is required: teachers complete the PASS based on

what they already know about the student from direct observation or

input from colleagues who work with the student. The instrument was

developed in collaboration with well-known transition experts, and

involved considerable interaction with State and local administrators

and practitioners in both special education and adult services. It has

been produced in a machine-scanable format.

The second component is the PASS expert system which is a micro-

computer-based program that converts the PASS data into projected

service estimates for individuals and groups based on data from the

PASS questionnaire. The prototype expert system, which incorporates the

knowledge and expertise of more than 30 special education and adult

services practitioners across the country, was field tested in over 100

school districts in 10 States to test the feasibility of administrative

procedures for collecting PASS data from schools and to guide

refinement of the PASS instrument and expert system prototype.

The American Institutes for Research (AIR) developed the

rudimentary prototype PASS system and tested its administrative

feasibility. AIR developed the following deliverables, which are

available from the Office of Special Education Programs: Evaluation of

the Utility of the PASS System; Technical Documentation for the PASS

Expert System; Technical Manual for the PASS Instrument; USER Guide to

the PASS Expert System; Report on the Administrative Feasibility of the

PASS System; Technical Documentation for the PASS Expert System;

Recommendations and Rationales for Revisions to the PASS Instrument and

Instructions.

Priority: The Assistant Secretary proposes to establish an absolute

priority for a project, through a cooperative agreement, to assist the

Office of Special Education Programs in evaluating the feasibility and

utility of the PASS system: (a) As a tool for transition planning,

across all disability categories and levels of severity; and (b) as a

tool for measuring student outcomes, across all disability categories

and levels of severity. Additionally, the project will validate the

expert system's decision rules.

The project must:

(a) Develop the conceptual framework for the study;

(b) Establish a Stakeholder group that will advise the project on

the study design;

(c) Develop data collection methods and instruments;

(d) Develop methods of data analysis;

(e) Carryout a field test;

(f) Provide guidance and support to States participating in the

field test;

(g) Analyze the results of the field test and prepare a final

report on the findings of the study; and

(h) Budget for two trips to Washington, D.C. each year. One trip to

meet with the OSEP Project Officer and

[[Page 56202]]

one trip to attend the annual Project Director's Meeting.

For Further Information Contact: Susan Sanchez, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3524, Switzer Building,

Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-8998. FAX: (202) 205-

8105. Internet: Susan__S[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-2641.

Proposed Absolute Priority 2--State-Federal Administrative Information

Exchange

Background: Information for decisionmaking and policy development

to ensure appropriate and effective education and early intervention

for all infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities is

critically important. State and Federal decision-makers responsible for

the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

(IDEA) must have access to valid statistics, research findings, and

policy options, as well as current information on trends in providing

of special education and related services.

The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) within the U.S.

Department of Education has the responsibility for Federal

administration of the IDEA. State Education Agencies (SEAs), or other

designated State agencies under Part H of the Act, oversee the

administration of the Act at State and local levels. This project will

facilitate the access and analysis of administrative and policy

information to and from the States and help other jurisdictions, and to

ensure the flow of communication between the Federal Government and

administrators of IDEA at State and local levels.

Priority: The Secretary proposes to establish a priority to

facilitate communication between the U.S. Department of Education and

State and local administrators of IDEA, and to synthesize national

program information that will improve the management, administration,

delivery and effectiveness of programs and services provided under the

Act. The cooperative agreement funded under this priority will provide

a mechanism and resources to the Department for analyzing policies and

emerging issues that are of significant national concern.

The project must--

(1) Identify national and State program improvement information

that is needed to obtain better results in education and providing

early intervention services for infants, toddlers, children, and youth

with disabilities;

(2) Organize, synthesize, interpret, integrate, and facilitate

dissemination of information needed for program improvement;

(3) Analyze emerging policy or program issues regarding the

administration of special education, early intervention, and related

services at the Federal, State and local levels;

(4) Facilitate the use of information at Federal, State and local

levels for program improvement for infants, toddlers, children, and

youth with disabilities.

The project must organize, coordinate, and maintain a data base

of laws, policies, and regulations that govern special education

within the States and other jurisdictions; communicate, on a regular

basis, with State educational agencies to identify emerging policy

issues; obtain, analyze and synthesize information relative to the

emerging issues; and convene experts, special education

administrators, and others to review, plan, and provide leadership

in recommending multi-level actions that respond to the emerging

issues. The project must communicate regularly with the Office of

Special Education Programs to ensure the continuing flow and

development of information that may be required at the Federal level

to facilitate the improvement and efficiency of administration of

the IDEA by the U.S. Department of Education.

Upon request of the OSEP project officer, the project should meet

with other funded projects of OSEP for purposes of cross-project

collaboration and information exchange. The project must also budget

for two trips annually to Washington, D.C. for: (1) A two-day Research

Project Directors' meeting; and (2) another meeting to meet and

collaborate with the OSEP project officer.

For Further Information Contact: Jane C. Williams, U.S. Department

of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3529, Switzer

Building, Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-9039. FAX:

(202) 205-8105. Internet: Jane__W[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8953.

Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,

82, 85, and 86; and (b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part

327.

Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of

higher education only.

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1418.

Program for Children and Youth With Serious Emotional Disturbance

Purpose of Program: To support projects designed to improve special

education and related services to children and youth with serious

emotional disturbance. Types of projects that may be supported under

the program include, but are not limited to, research, development, and

demonstration projects. Funds may also be used to develop and

demonstrate approaches to assist and prevent children with emotional

and behavioral problems from developing serious emotional disturbance.

Priority

Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) the Secretary proposes to give an

absolute preference to applications that meet the following priority.

The Secretary proposes to fund under these competitions only

applications that meet this absolute priority:

Proposed Absolute Priority--Developing Effective Secondary School-Based

Practices for Youth With Serious Emotional Disturbance

Background: Recent nationwide research on secondary school

experiences and post-school outcomes for students with disabilities

finds that youth with serious emotional disturbance (SED) are at

particularly high risk for school failure and for poor post-school

outcomes. While the majority of secondary age students with SED attend

regular high schools, most of these students receive special education

and related services outside the regular classroom for a substantial

part, or all, of their school day. SED students attending regular

secondary schools tend, as a group: to display erratic school

attendance patterns; to achieve low levels of academic success despite

generally normal-and-above ability levels; to be minimally involved in

the social milieu of their schools; and to drop out of school at

alarming rates. Fifty percent drop out of school, most by the tenth

grade.

Poor adjustment and behavioral concerns are common during and

beyond high school among these students. Data from the National

Longitudinal Transition Study show that only one in ten students with

serious emotional disturbance have behavior management plans. They tend

to be under- or un-employed, are rarely involved in post-secondary

education, and are at high risk for engaging in activities and

behaviors outside the bounds of the law.

While fairly substantial recent and current efforts are focusing on

[[Page 56203]]

improving results for younger students with SED, little attention is

being directed toward their secondary-age counterparts. This priority

is intended to address this critical need.

Priority: The Secretary proposes to establish an absolute priority

for projects to develop, implement, test the efficacy of, and

disseminate practices for improving academic, vocational, personal,

social, and behavioral results for students with SED in regular high

schools, including consideration of the most appropriate and least

restrictive placements.

Under this priority, projects must--

(1) Develop practices with sound conceptual bases that are designed

to improve critical academic, vocational, personal, social, and

behavioral outcomes for SED students;

(2) Apply rigorous research standards in testing the efficacy of

practices developed;

(3) Develop products that include clear, comprehensive descriptions

of tested practices, test site contexts, and target student

characteristics, and disseminate these products to appropriate research

institutes, clearinghouses, and technical assistance providers.

A project must budget for two trips annually to Washington, D.C.

for: (1) A two-day Research Project Directors' meeting; and (2) another

meeting to meet and collaborate with the OSEP project officer and with

other relevant OSEP funded projects.

For Further Information Contact: Helen Thornton, U.S. Department of

Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3520, Switzer Building,

Washington, D.C. 20202-2641. Telephone: (202) 205-5910. Fax: (202) 205-

8105. Internet: Helen__T[email protected]. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD number:

(202) 205-8953.

Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81,

82, 85, and 86; and (b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part

328.

Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of

higher education only.

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1423.

Intergovernmental Review

Except for the Research in Education of Individuals with

Disabilities Program (84.023) and the Special Studies Program (84.159),

all other programs included in this notice are subject to the

requirements of Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR

Part 79. The objective of the Executive order is to foster an

intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism by relying

on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination

and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.

In accordance with the order, this document is intended to provide

early notification of the Department's specific plans and actions for

this program.

Invitation to Comment

Interested persons are invited to submit comments and

recommendations regarding these proposed priorities.

All comments submitted in response to this notice will be available

for public inspection, during and after the comment period, in Room

3524, 300 C Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., between the hours of 8:30

a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday of each week except Federal

holidays.

Dated: September 14, 1995.

Howard R. Moses,

Acting Assistant for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers: Research in

Education of Individuals with Disabilities Program, 84.023; Early

Education Program for Children with Disabilities, 84.024; Media

Research, Production, Distribution, and Training Program, 84.026;

Postsecondary Education Program for Individuals with Disabilities

Program, 84.078; Program for Children with Severe Disabilities,

84.086; Secondary Education and Transitional Services Program for

Youth with Disabilities, 84.158; Special Studies Program, 84.159;

and Program for Children and Youth with Serious Emotional

Disturbance, 84.237)

[FR Doc. 95-27508 Filed 11-6-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.